A18 - ADCS Tablet - RFP N6449823R4015 00002.pdf
PDF 788 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advanced Damage Control System Tablet Hardware Equipment Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6449823R4015
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A18 - ADCS Tablet - RFP N6449823R4015 00003.pdf | ||
| Ruggedized Tablet Requirements_4APR2022.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A18 - ADCS Tablet - RFP N6449823R4015 - Conformed.pdf | ||
| A18 - ADCS Tablet - RFP N6449823R4015 00001.pdf | ||
| A18 - ADCS Tablet - RFP N6449823R4015 - Final.pdf | ||
| A18 - ADCS Tablet - RFP N6449823R4015 - Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1. Include Questions and Answers in Section A. The closing date of 28 April 2023 remains unchanged.
3.
26-
X
1) Will the Naval Warfare Center allow for IP65 in rugged tablets instead of IP66 to allow for more vendors to respond offering more product choices for U.S. Navy?
IP65 is minimum requirement, anything greater will be evaluated more favorably.
2) Will the Naval Warfare Center allow for rugged tablets with MIL-810H and MIL-461G, but not certified for MIL-S-901D and MIL-S-167?
Minimum specs must be MIL-S-901D and MIL-S-167, provide copy of test report.
3) It calls for a 16:9 ratio, this would imply that a 1920x1080 resolution is acceptable. The called out resolution of 1920x1200 is a 16:10 ratio and not commonly found in the commercial tablet market. The two lines are conflicting and I was hoping for clarification?
16:9 ratio is the correct aspect ratio with 1920x1080 resolution.
4) The spec asks for a 12”-14” screen. Is 11.6” acceptable?
Not acceptable
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .