The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Statement of Work **Revised 12 JULY 2018** AN/UYQ-70 Advanced Display System Sustainment
1. INTRODUCTION
This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the efforts required for the manufacture, assembly, and test of the AN/UYQ-70 Advanced Display System equipment, spares, and associated technical services. The Q-70 contract shall provide: engineering services, supportability and life cycle support, and related procurements to the Air Dominance Department of the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division (NSWC PHD), Port Hueneme, California.
NSWC PHD is a field activity of Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and is the in-service engineering agent (ISEA) for the Q-70.
2. BACKGROUND
The Q-70 was originally chartered by the FY93 Defense Appropriations Act to meet the emergent display requirements of the Theater Air Defense Program, including Advanced Combat Direction System, Cooperative Engagement Capability, and Ship Self-Defense System requirements. FY95 Congressional language broadened these requirements to include the AEGIS Combat System along with emergent requirements for combat systems requiring and advanced display and processor capability. FY96 Congressional language provided for continued product improvements and initial post-production operation and support. Congressional language in each of the years FY97-FY02 directed integration of the AN/UYQ-70(V) into Navy combat systems.
The AN/UYQ-70(V) was designated an Acquisition Category (ACAT) IVT acquisition by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition (ASN (RD&A)). Milestone III approval was granted in November 1997. With the increase in contract ceiling due to increased projected procurement the AN/UYQ-70(V) has been designated an Acquisition Category (ACAT) II based on the procurement total expenditure exceeding $660 million (10 USC 2302s, reference (o)).
The initial competitive AN/UYQ-70(V) contract was awarded in January 1994 in response to the need for a new generation of display, workstation, processor and network systems. The follow-on AN/UYQ-70(V) Production Contract, N00024-98-D-5202, was competitively awarded in July 1998.
Navy Display Systems competitive solicitation N00024-R-6312 was released on 2JAN2004. Despite efforts to foster competition - e.g., an industry briefing, a draft Request for Proposal (RFP), requests for industry comments and one-on-one meetings with potential bidders/vendors – when the solicitation closed on 1MAR2004, the Government received only one proposal. The Contracting Officer determined that proposal had been developed in a non-competitive environment and contained unacceptable assumptions. It consequently was deemed unacceptable. As a result, the solicitation was cancelled in its entirety on 15MAR2004.
A sole source contract, N00024-05-C-5132, was awarded for production of previously established AN/UYQ-70(V) configurations. A separate contract, N00024-05-C-5132, was established for two years of Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) for engineering services for development efforts. A BOA, N00024-05-G-5131, was established to provide support for AN/UYQ-70(V) variants no longer in production. A follow-on BOA (current), N63394-12-G-1240, to provide support for AN/UYQ-70(V) variants no longer in production, N00024-05-G-5131 was fully executed in 2012. The AN/UYQ-70(V) Basic Ordering Agreement, N63394-12-G-1240, was awarded in August 2012 and expired 30SEP2015. That BOA was a two-year, mix of Cost-Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) and Firm Fixed Price (FFP). That sole source Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) was awarded with an authorized sole source procurement authority of $49 Million.
N63394-16-G-0002 was awarded 25FEB2016 to support continuing the Q-70 services. The Navy must continue the requirement for continued AN/UYQ-70(V) support in order to meet shipbuilding and platform modernization requirements of record, e.g. AEGIS, Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion (ARCI), Ships Self Defense System (SSDS), and Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR). The result was issuing a new BOA in a two-year increment beginning 18 December 2015 through 17 December 2017, with a ceiling of under $10 Million.
The AN/UYQ-70 Advanced Display System (Q-70 ADS -or- Q-70 -or- ADS) is a continuously evolving family of display, processor, and network systems, designed to satisfy a wide spectrum of mission critical and mission essential applications. In conjunction with this objective, it is concurrently a Software Operating Environment built to comply with Open Architecture (OA) standards, incorporating functionally modular designs comprised of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS)/Non-Developmental Item (NDI) software and hardware components. These components integrate together using industry-accepted software and communication interface standards IAW Prime Item Development Specifications (PIDS).
This OA approach using COTS/NDI products and industry interface standards allows for reduced development time, reduced non-recurring and recurring costs and shortened procurement schedules, as well as timely technology upgrades at the component, module, and system levels which hosts and executes customer combat and weapon systems (i.e., ACDS, AWS, CEC, C2P, SGS, E-2C) application software, orders up to IT Level II to provide the required operational display, peripheral processor, and network requirements, and advanced capabilities. Additionally, it is a System Integrator Support Structure, which includes Commercial Direct Vendor Delivery (CDVD) / Performance Based Logistics (PBL), obsolescence management and Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) for the Q-70 Equipment. Q-70 equipment is installed on numerous classes of surface ships, submarines, and E-2C aircraft throughout the US Navy (USN) and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Fleet.
The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division (NSWC PHD) is the In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA) for the Q-70 and AEGIS Weapon Systems (AWS).
The Q-70 consists of the Enclosure Assembly and 3 (three) subsystems for: Processing, Storage/Extraction, and Input/ Output (I/O). The Enclosure Assembly includes power, cooling, and hotel services. The Processing Subsystem provides the computing resources to execute Navy Combat System Application programs on various platforms. The Storage/Extraction Subsystem provides the mass storage resources required for Operating System (OS) image storage, program storage, data extraction, and database management. The I/O Subsystem provides the resources required to interface the processing and storage hardware to various external elements.
Through its ability to host multiple types of software applications, the Q-70 provides the processing resources for multiple Combat/Weapons systems:
Family of Combat Systems & Networks/Display Workstation under AN/UYQ-70:
· AEGIS and SSDS Advanced Display System Consoles
· Peripheral Emulation Program Console
· Command & Decision Control Console
· Embedded Processing System Cabinets
· Secure Voice System
· Next Generation Peripheral
· SPA-25 Radar Repeater
· Acoustic Display Console
· Mission Critical Enclosure
3. SCOPE
This requirement will provide for engineering services, logistics, installation, procurement, and limited production of any additional Ordnance Alteration (ORDALT) Kits and parts required to provide Life-Cycle support for Q-70 equipment integrated into the below listed United States Navy (USN) and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programs:
PEO IWS 1.0 - AEGIS Weapon System (AWS), Sponsor – Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems
PEO IWS 2.0 - SLQ-32
PEO IWS 3.0 - Gun Weapon System (GWS) / Vertical Launch System (VLS) PEO IWS 4.0 - Foreign Military Sales PEO IWS 5.0 - Aircraft Carrier Tactical Support System (CV-TSC) PEO IWS 10.0 - Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) PEO IWS 11 - Terminal Defense System
PEO IWS 12 - NATO SEASPARROW (NSSMS)
PMS 326 - MK92 Fire Control System (FCS) NAVAIR - E-2C Surveillance Aircraft Advanced Control Indicator set (ACIS) Missile Defense Agency (MDA) - Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD)
4. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS AND STATEMENTS
4.1 Applicable Documents
The following documents form part of the SOW to the extent specified herein. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the SOW shall be considered the superseding requirement.
| 4.1.2 | Government Documents |
| Document # |
| Title |
| SL720-AA-MAN-030 |
| Navy Modernization Process Management and Operational Manual (NMP-MOM) (Latest Version) |
| MIL-STD-1662C |
| (OS) Preparation of Ordinance Alteration (ORDALT) Instructions (Latest Version) |
| NAVSEA 4130.12B |
| CM Policy and Guidance (Latest Version) |
| NAVSEA 4130.6 |
| (ORDALT) Instruction Control Procedures (Latest Version) |
| NAVSEA 4130.9 |
| Configuration Control Procedures for Preparation and Implementation of ORDALTs (Latest Version) |
| NAVSEA 4720.11C |
| Shipboard Installations and Modifications Performed by Alteration Installation Teams (Latest Version) |
| NAVSEA Technical Specification 9090.310 |
| Alterations to Ships Accomplished by Alteration Installation Team (Latest Version) |
| NAVSEAINST 4790.8 (Series) |
| Ships’ Maintenance and Material Management (3-M) (Latest Version) |
| PEOIWSINST 4130.1B) |
| Program Executive Office (PEO) for Integrated Warfare Systems (IWS) Enterprise Configuration Control Process Latest Version) |
| MIL-HDBK |
| Program Executive Office, Integrated Warfare Systems (PEO IWS) – Deputy Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command Warfare Systems Engineering Directorate (NAVSEA 05H) Technical Review Manual (TRM), 18 December 2009 |
| PEO IWS Program Plan |
| Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Plan August 2005 |
| PEOIWSINST 4130.1C |
| PEO IWS Enterprise Configuration Control Process |
| NAVSEAINST 4160.3 |
| Technical Manual Management Program (TMMP) (Latest Version) |
| NAVSEAINST 5000.8 |
| Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy 21JUL2008 |
| NAVESEAINST 4130.12B |
| Configuration Management Policy and Guidance |
| NSWCPHD INSTRUCTION 5239.4 |
| Cyberspace Information Technology And Cybersecurity Workforce Qualification Program |
| 4.1.3 | Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Defense (DoD), and DoD Services Documents |
| Document # |
| Title |
| Defense Acquisition Guidebook 4.3.3.4.7, https://dag.dau.mil |
| Production Readiness Reviews (PRR) |
| DoD 5220.22M |
| Defense Security Service (DSS) National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), 28FEB2006 |
| 4.1.4 | Military Standards (MIL-STD) |
| Document # |
| Title |
| MIL-STD-129P |
| DoD Standard Practice, Military marking for Shipment and Storage, 19 September 2007 |
| MIL-STD 130N |
| Department of Defense Standard Practice Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, 15JUN2007 |
| MIL-STD-2073-1E |
| DoD Standard Practice for Military Packing, 7JAN2011 |
| 4.1.5 | Other Military Documents |
| Document # |
| Title |
| MIL-D-23140D |
| Drawings, Installation Control, for Shipboard Electronic Equipment |
| MIL-DTL-31000C |
| Technical Data Packages, Detail Specification |
| MIL-P-24534A |
| Planned Maintenance System: Development Of Maintenance Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index Pages, and Associated Documentation |
| MIL-PRF-29612B |
| Training Data Products |
| 4.1.6 | Handbooks |
| Document # |
| Title |
| MIL-HDBK-61A |
| Configuration Management Guidance |
| MIL-HDBK-881A |
| Work Breakdown Structures For Defense Materiel Items |
| 4.1.7 | Non-Government/Commercial Standards |
| Document # |
| Title |
| ANSI/ASQC Q9001-2008 |
| Quality Systems - Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing |
| 4.1.8 | Other Documents, Drawings, and Publications listed in the table below form a part of this document to the extent specified herein: |
| Industry Documents |
| Title |
| American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ASME Y14.24-2012 |
| Types and Applications of Engineering Drawings |
| American Society for Testing of Materials (ASTM) ASTM 1166-07 |
| Standard Practice for Human Engineering Design for Marine Systems, Equipment, and Facilities |
| American Society for Testing of Materials (ASTM) ASTM F1337-10(2015) |
| Standard Practice For Human Engineering Program Requirements For Ships And Marine Systems, Equipment, And Facilities |
| IEEE/EIA 12207.0-2017 |
| Software Life Cycle Processes |
| International Organization for Standards (ISO) ISO 9001:2015 |
| Quality Management Systems – Requirements |
| S0005-AA-PRO-010/TMMP |
| NAVSEA Technical Manual Management Program |
| S0300-A7-AEG-010, 020, 030 |
| AEGIS Style Guide for Development and Publication of Combat/Weapon System Technical Manuals |
4.2 Statements
| 4.2.1 | This document is UNCLASSIFIED; however, the classification of the work to be performed may require access to secure areas and classified information up to and including SECRET, per the attached Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254. Security requirements will be identified in each individual contract vehicle. In the event a particular order requires revised, updated or additional security classification guidance, the DD Form 254 will either be revised, or a separate DD Form 254 issued for that order. |
| 4.2.2 | In accordance with SECNAV M-5510.30, the Navy Personnel Security Program Manual (Chapter 6, Section 6-6, Paragraphs 2b and 2c), Executive Order 13467 of 30JUNE2008, as well as Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12) and United States Office of Personnel Management Memorandum, Final Credentialing Standards for Issuing Personal Identity Verification Cards under HSPD-12 dated 31JUL2008, the Contractor shall ensure that all individuals performing work on behalf of the Government have a current, favorably adjudicated background investigation of the appropriate type to determine fitness to perform work on behalf of the Government as a Contractor employee, perform sensitive national Security Duties, or have access to Classified Information. A background investigation equivalent to the current Tier requirement and which is still in Scope is acceptable. |
| 4.2.3 | Contractor Employees who require access to Classified Information will be processed under the terms of the National Industrial Security Program (NISP) in alignment with the work requirements of the contract and Security Requirements on the applicable DD Form 254. Contractor employees who do not require access to classified information in performance of this contract but are assigned to sensitive national security duties, require access to sensitive information, or those that for other reasons require a fitness or trustworthiness determination shall be processed for the appropriate background investigation through the Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division (NSWC PHD) Personnel Security Office for a Non-NISP investigation. Point of contact is the Personnel Security Specialist, (805) 228-7196. |
| 4.2.4 | NSWC PHD Command Security Manager (CSM) shall be made aware of any Contractor personnel who have: an investigation with an action pending, eligibility has been administratively withdrawn or pending, withdrawal of interim clearance eligibility, eligibility of no determination made, or final denial or revocation of Security Clearance Eligibility. |
| 4.2.5 | The Contractor shall possess and maintain Cybersecurity Workforce Operating System/Computing Environment certifications required by Department of Navy (DoN). |
| 4.2.6 | Access to DoD and DoN IT Systems. Individuals who require IT-I level access to sensitive DoD and DoN IT systems require a favorably adjudicated Tier 5 investigation, and individuals who require IT-II level access to such systems require a Tier 3 investigation. All access to DoN IT systems is, at minimum, IT-II. |
| 4.2.7 | The Navy adopted Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Electronic Industries Alliance (IEEE/EIA) Standard 12207, Standard for Information Technology, in May 1998, as its basis for software development planning and acquisition. This standard defines a framework within which specific software development life cycles can be defined and provides a standard set of terminology to be used when describing these activities. This standard does not define any specific approach; it allows a wide variation of system life cycles and facilitating the customization of approaches to accommodate the needs of individual systems. The Contractor shall ensure compliance with the most recent IEEE/EIA Standard 12207. "The Contractor shall demonstrate a level of competency with established processes commensurate with Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Q Level 3." |
5. REQUIREMENTS
Services necessary to support the Q-70 User community include:
| 5.1 | General Requirements |
| 5.2 | Program Management Control |
| 5.3 | Commercial Component Obsolescence Management |
| 5.4 | Procurements |
| 5.5 | Reliability Engineering, Failure Analysis and Redesign |
| 5.6 | Test and Evaluation |
| 5.7 | Engineering Data for Provisioning, Technical Change Development, Configuration Support Services Engineering Drawings, and Technical Documentation |
| 5.8 | Operating Environment and Diagnostic Software Toolset Maintenance and Upgrades |
| 5.9 | Upgrade and Technical Refresh Kit |
| 5.10 | Equipment Refurbishment and Assembly/Component Repair |
| 5.11 | In-Service Engineering, Installations, and Field Services |
| 5.12 | System Assessment Support Services |
5.1 General Requirements
The Contractor shall manage and execute all activities under this contract, including those of any subcontractors, suppliers and sub-tier vendors.
| 5.1.1 | The Contractor shall designate a Program Manager. The Program Manager shall have complete responsibility and authority for the planning, execution, control and reporting of all aspects of the Contractor’s efforts including Subcontractor efforts. |
| 5.1.2 | The Contractor shall prepare a Contractors Progress, Status & Management Report. |
| 5.1.3 | The Contractor shall prepare a contract funds status funding report. |
| 5.1.4 | The Contractor shall prepare a closeout financial report. |
| 5.1.5 | The Contractor shall maintain a list of personnel who have completed their training as specified in Section H. |
| 5.1.6 | The Contractor shall provide a security clearance list for all personnel working on this procurement. |
| 5.1.7 | The Contractor shall prepare an Emergency Action Plan Report associated to the services performed in this SOW. Contractors storing classified documentation and classified equipment at their facilities in accordance with tasking in this requirement shall develop and maintain an EAP and provide a report. |
| 5.1.8 | The Contractor shall prepare a muster report as directed. |
| 5.1.9 | The Contractor shall prepare a HAZMAT/HAZWASTE report associated to the services performed in this SOW. |
| 5.1.10 | The Contractor shall provide trip reports in support of the services performed in this SOW. |
| 5.1.11 | The Contractor shall upload the Contractor's Funds and Man-hour Expenditure Reports in the Electronic Cost Reporting and Financial Tracking (e-CRAFT) System and submit the Contract Status Report on the day and for the same timeframe the contractor submits an invoice into the Invoicing, Receipt, Acceptance, and Property Transfer (iRAPT) system. The contractor shall submit their reports on the same day and for the same timeframe the contractor submits an invoice in iRAPT. The amounts shall be the same. e-CRAFT acceptance/rejection will be indicated by e-mail notification from e-CRAFT. Compliance with this requirement is a material requirement of this contract. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in contract termination. |
| 5.1.12 | In conjunction with the COR and Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall assign standard e-CRAFT labor categories to each existing proposed and executed labor category on the Task Order/Contract. |
| 5.1.13 | Work under this contract requires access to classified information up to and including the Secret level. The tasks at the Secret level will be performed at NSWC PHD, other government locations, and cleared contractor locations. Access to classified information is not required at the awarded contractor’s facility. Additional security classification guidance will be provided at the time of solicitation via DD Form 254. |
5.2 Program Management and Control
The Contractor shall provide program management oversight to ensure all work conducted within this contract is planned and executed in a manner that will achieve all quality, schedule and cost objectives.
| 5.2.1 | The Contractor shall provide an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS). |
| 5.2.2 | The Contractor shall provide Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) |
| 5.2.3 | Periodic Management Review (PMR). PMRs shall be conducted in person at the Contractor’s plant or via teleconferencing with the Contractor providing a summary of its current program status to include information provided in the Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Reports and any additional relevant information. |
| 5.2.4 | Quarterly Program Reviews. The Contractor shall conduct quarterly program reviews if exercised, beginning four (4) months after award of contract, to assess the Contractor’s progress and status. The Contractor shall provide, at a minimum: an overview of engineering and ORDALT development status, review of program Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) status, including disclosure of any and all known DMSMS items, the planned action to mitigate its engineering and Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) impacts, and a report on the small business utilization. The status of the Contractor’s efforts to achieve the requirements set forth in the contract will be emphasized. Vendor/subcontractor status and problems shall also be addressed; as such, vendors/subcontractors may support the review as required. In addition, a separate review may be conducted to cover a special set of circumstances or troublesome area(s), but the reviews shall be considered part of and conducted with the quarterly production review. An Action Item List shall be prepared and maintained by the Contractor during the life of this contract to enable tracing the closure of generated action items. |
| 5.2.5 | The Contractor shall create and maintain a Risk Management Plan. Contractor shall generate risk metrics in accordance with DODINST 8510.01, Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT) and reported as part of the Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report and during program reviews. |
5.2.6 The Contractor shall provide an end of contract transition plan.
5.3 Commercial Component Obsolescence Management
| 5.3.1 | The Contractor shall monitor, identify, plan for and resolve Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortage (DMSMS) and obsolescence issues. The Contractor shall provide a DMSMS obsolescence notification report and DMSMS Implementation Plan. |
| 5.3.2 | The Contractor shall provide a proposed resolution plan that may include: product upgrade, technology refresh, lifetime buys, bridge buys and/or a redesign to meet the requirements of the contract. DMSMS solutions shall be implemented in accordance with the NAVSEA 4130.12B Configuration Management Policy and Guidance. |
| 5.3.3 | The Contractor shall select products for production whose obsolescence is not less than one year past the end of production. The product lifetime equals the timeframe that the product can be purchased from the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). Any products that do not meet this criterion must be approved by the Government ISEA prior to final product selection. For the purposes of this contract, hardware, software, and/or firmware shall be considered obsolete when the item can no longer be procured from the OEM. |
| 5.3.4 | The Contractor shall provide a report of recall notices from suppliers of materials, components or products in the Q-70 equipment. |
| 5.3.5 | The Contractor shall provide a technical report of recommendations to resolve all Contractor or Government identified obsolescence issues. |
| 5.3.6 | DMSMS Forecasting Source Data. The Contractor shall perform DMSMS obsolescence surveillance. Contractor shall submit a DMSMS Health Analysis and Forecasting Bill of Materials Report for all Q-70 configurations to support production and/or changes to Q-70 systems implemented during production. |
5.4 Procurements
| 5.4.1 | The Contractor shall procure: parts, materials, life of type buys, and replacement items for parts that are going or have gone obsolete. The Government will specify requirement through Technical Instruction. |
| 5.4.2 | The Contractor shall procure equipment, piece parts, ORDALT Kits, Installation Check-Out (INCO) Spares, parts and firmware required to produce Q-70 ORDALT Kits for equipment upgrades. |
| 5.4.3 | The Contractor shall procure parts, materials and replacements for ORDALT Kit items that become obsolete. The Government will specify requirement through Technical Instruction. |
| 5.4.4 | The Contractor shall accurately document, track materials and purchased parts, provide As-Built Configuration Lists (ABCL) for all kits, and provide a material procurement plan which includes effective procedures to determine material needs, lead times, and delivery schedule. |
| 5.4.5 | The Contractor shall provide packaging, shipping and tracking of ORDALT Kits, Materials, or LRUs for delivery as specified by the Government. |
| 5.4.6 | Item Unique Identification (IUID), The Contractor shall apply DoD Item Unique Identification (IUID) markings to the Q-70 units at the unit level assemblies and associated Lowest Replaceable Units (LRUs) in accordance with the TDP and MIL-STD-130. |
| 5.4.7 | Packaging Handling, Storage and Transportation (PHS&T) The Contractor shall develop the PHS&T plan to adhere to MIL-STD-129 and MIL-STD-130 or as specified in Task Instruction. |
| 5.4.8 | The Contractor shall provide certificates of compliance and ensure International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) compliant products adhere to current procurement screening processes. |
5.5 Reliability Engineering, Failure Analysis and Redesign
| 5.5.1 | The Contractor shall provide services required to plan, implement, conduct, and support a tailored Reliability/Maintainability (R&M) program. The Contractor shall have a system for collecting and recording all failures (both critical and non-critical) which occur during all test and inspection procedures. Individual Failure Records shall include as a minimum: the failure record number, part number, name, manufacturer, date of failure, operating hours, problem description, investigation procedures, corrective action status, and corresponding Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) number when applicable. |
| 5.5.2 | The Contractor shall review field failure data from sites, shipyards and the fleet to identify problems impacting Q-70 Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) characteristics and to determine adverse trends. All failures shall be analyzed and corrective action implemented to preclude recurrence of the failure. The effectiveness of the corrective action shall be evaluated by the continued review of Failure Records. |
| 5.5.3 | The Contractor shall provide services to conduct root cause analysis and recommend corrective actions. Investigations shall be performed to establish root cause of failure and corrective action for R&M problems and failure trends and failure analysis reports shall be provided detailing root cause of failure trend. |
| 5.5.4 | The Contractor shall monitor and report all installation and testing failures as requested by Government. The Contractor shall have a system for collecting and recording all failures (both critical and non-critical) which occur during all test and installation procedures. Individual Failure Records shall include as a minimum: the failure record number, part number, name, manufacturer, date of failure, operating hours, problem description, and corrective action status. |
| 5.5.5 | The Contractor shall provide design or redesign improvement recommendations in technical reports with findings and methodology used to resolve Q-70 issues. |
| 5.5.6 | The Contractor shall provide services to test and evaluate the findings to ensure the recommended technical solution has been fully evaluated and tested in the applicable Q-70 baseline operating environment at land based test sites or aboard US or Foreign Navy Ships if explicitly directed by the Government. |
5.6 Test and Evaluation
| 5.6.1 | The Contractor shall provide services to test, evaluate, and qualify assemblies. The Contractor shall also evaluate assemblies prior to delivery of ORDALT Kits and INCO Spares or concurrent with installation at sites or aboard ships to ensure that delivered items meet all requirements for installation as specified in System Reference Document (SRD). Tests include: Functional Bench Testing, First Article Testing, Environmental Qualification Testing, Integration Testing, Software Compatibility Testing, and any necessary regression testing. The Contractor shall provide test plans and test reports as required. |
| 5.6.2 | The Contractor shall provide onsite engineering and technical support during test and evaluation events. The Contractor shall provide technical reports and trip reports. |
| 5.6.3 | The Contractor shall support Physical Configuration Audit (PCA), Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) for first ORDALT Kits and major cabinet level redesigns and as required for lower level units and assemblies. PCA and/or FCA will be conducted at the designated production site. Government will provide Test Plans and Procedures prior to PCA or FCA as specified by individual task order. |
| 5.6.4 | The Contractor shall perform testing and analysis to ensure compatibility and interoperability of Q-70 products and equipment produced under this contract with systems delivered under previous Q-70 production contracts. The Contractor shall identify discrepancies or shortfalls and provide technical report. |
5.7 Provisioning, Technical Change Development, Configuration Management Support Services and Technical Data Package (TDP) Maintenance
| 5.7.1 | The Contractor shall provide Provisioning, Technical Change Development and Configuration Support services. These services include the following: Equipment Changes and ORDALT Implementation Support, Engineering and Integrated Product Support (IPS) (i.e., Updates and maintenance to Government Documents will be specified by Technical Instruction. Documents include but are not limited to: Technical Manuals, Software Development Plan (SDP), Software Design Description (SDD), Installation and Checkout (INCO) Spares Listing, Lowest Replaceable Unit (LRU) Cross- Reference List, Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD), Supplemental Data for Provisioning (SDFP), AIT Workbook, Engineering Change Notice (ECN), Document Change Notice (DCN), Request for Deviation (RFD), ECP, TDP, TDP modeling files, preliminary and finalized drawings and updates, preliminary ORDALT Installation Instructions, as required). |
| 5.7.2 | The Contractor shall provide scheduling, production, and project management services for major upgrades, Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Refresh and Configuration Database Support. |
| 5.7.3 | The Contractor shall support LRU Classification Assessment and provide inputs and recommendations to the Risk Assessment Reports for Engineering Change Proposals that impact memory, storage, networking and processing capabilities. |
| 5.7.4 | Engineering Change Proposals. The Contractor shall prepare and submit preliminary ECPs for all proposed configuration changes including changes generated by vendors. The purpose of the preliminary ECP is to provide advance notification of a proposed change, assign a recommended ECP classification (Class I or II), and obtain Government concurrence to expend resources to fully document the proposed change. If a Class I ECP is proposed, the Contractor shall include rationale explaining why the proposed change cannot be accomplished by a Class II ECP. The Contractor shall include Life Cycle Cost (LCC) impact estimates as part of the preliminary Class I ECP. |
| 5.7.4.1 | The Contractor shall describe in all ECPs the logistics impact(s), including form/fit/function interchangeability, applicability, reliability and maintainability requirements. The Contractor shall provide all applicable provisioning support data and Supplemental Provisioning Technical Data (SPTD) for all maintenance significant items introduced and/or affected by the ECP. The Contractor shall provide updates, prepare ECPs, describe in all ECPs the impact(s) to provisioning, including form/fit/function interchangeability, applicability, reliability and maintainability requirements. |
| 5.7.4.2 | The Contractor shall generate ECPs when directed by the Government and/or following Government approval of a preliminary ECP. DD Forms 1692 and 1693 shall be used for Class I and II ECPs, respectively. An ECP shall contain the data necessary for the Government to render final Configuration Control Board (CCB) disposition. |
| 5.7.5 | Request for Deviation: The Contractor shall generate a Request for Deviation (RFD) to request approval for a temporary departure from a specific requirement(s) of the approved Q-70 baseline. DD Form 1694 shall be used for RFDs. Permanent Changes require a Specification Change Notice (SCN) to be generated. |
| 5.7.6 | Technical Data Package (TDP) Maintenance. The Contractor shall update and maintain the existing TDP provided as GFI to reflect all Q-70 products. The Contractor shall perform update and maintenance of the existing TDP in an incremental fashion as equipment changes are made. The TDP shall contain all data sufficient to provide life cycle support for all Q-70 products and changes thereto. The Contractor shall ensure all Q-70 products are included in the Q-70 TDP. |
5.8 Operating Environment and Diagnostic Software Toolset Maintenance and Upgrades
| 5.8.1 | The Contractor shall provide Operating Environment Maintenance and upgrades services to Q-70 equipment. This shall include all software, middleware, and the licenses (e.g., updates, maintenance, patches, helpdesk support, and other software or middleware products) delivered under previous contracts as part of Q-70 deliveries and necessary for basic system operations (e.g., diagnostics, Built In Test (BIT), boot loader, performance monitoring, time services, operating environment, plus the operating system kernel necessary to run the aforementioned software). All software procured or developed under this contract shall not require license renewal in order to continue uninterrupted operation. Service Agreements shall at a minimum cover a period of two years from the date of delivery. A report shall be generated to identify inventory and utilization of Software, Middleware, Firmware and Licenses. |
| 5.8.2 | The Contractor shall provide services related to the upgrade and maintenance of the Diagnostic Software Toolset. |
| 5.8.3 | The Contractor shall follow shipboard and Land Based Test Site (LBTS) Cyber security requirements as required by the contract. |
5.9 Upgrade and Technical Refresh Kits
| 5.9.1 | The Contractor shall develop, build, and upgrade technical refresh kits and provide services including harvesting, qualification, production, installation, and coordination of Integrated Product Support (IPS) product change development and product delivery as required. This shall include equipment and system technical documentation, including but not limited to Technical Manuals (TM), Engineering Change Proposals (ECP), Planned Maintenance System (PMS) including Maintenance Requirement Card (MRC) and Maintenance Index Page (MIP), data for update to Allowance Parts List (APL) and Work Packages (WP) supplied as GFI/GFM. |
| 5.9.2 | Contractor shall evaluate the Upgrade and Tech Refresh Kits for impact to the Q-70 Environmental Qualification and provide a technical recommendations report. |
| 5.9.3 | Contractor shall perform Environmental Qualification Testing (EQT) as determined by the Government and provide results in a test report. |
| 5.9.4 | Production Readiness Review (PRR). The Contractor shall identify existing and projected manufacturing problems and areas of risk and shall assess the progress in the Contractor's planning to achieve production rates required under the delivery schedule to be provided by the Government upon contract award. The Contractor shall successfully complete a PRR 30 days prior to production of ORDALT Kits, or LRUs at the Government’s discretion. |
| 5.9.5 | The Contractor shall provide kitting services and assemble ORDALT Kits. |
| 5.9.6 | The Contractor shall provide packaging, shipping and tracking of ORDALT Kits, Materials, or LRUs for delivery as specified by the Government. |
| 5.9.7 | Item Unique Identification (IUID). The Contractor shall apply DoD Item Unique Identification (IUID) markings to the Q-70 equipment at the unit level assemblies and associated Lowest Replaceable Units (LRUs) in accordance with the TDP and MIL-STD-130 or as determined by the Government. Contractor shall adhere to approved Marking Plans and update as necessary due to new design changes. |
| 5.9.8 | Packaging Handling, Storage and Transportation (PHS&T). The Contractor shall adhere to the existing Q-70 PHS&T plan in accordance with MIL-STD-129 or as determined by the Government. Contractor shall adhere to approved PHS&T Plan and update as necessary due to new design changes. |
5.10 Equipment Refurbishment and Assembly/Component Repair
| 5.10.1 | The Contractor shall provide equipment repair and refurbishment services. Refurbishment services shall be required for equipment harvested from active ships as well as Navy land based test laboratories. All equipment, parts, diagnostics, and repair services required to ensure refurbished equipment meets original operational requirements and packaging shall be included. |
| 5.10.2 | The Contractor shall provide assembly/component repair services required by the Government. Contractor shall perform an assessment and estimation for repair for items received. Assessment shall include contractor recommendation regarding repair feasibility. |
5.11 In-Service Engineering, Installations, and Field Services
| 5.11.1 | The Contractor shall provide Engineering and Field Services to include Distance Support, ORDALT AIT installation services, informal instruction to users, shipboard Fleet Technical Assistance and Supply Support for parts and technical services, all in conjunction with and in support of Government’s In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA) sustainment actions. |
| 5.11.2 | Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) and Working Groups. The Contractor shall participate in IPTs as required by the government. |
| 5.11.3 | Waterfront Support Meetings. The Contractor shall support and participate in Waterfront Reviews and related production (daily de-conflict) and weekly installation status meetings. This meeting is performed while the installation is ongoing. |
| 5.11.4 | Engineering Support Meetings. The Contractor shall support and participate in Engineering Review Boards and Review Meetings including Hardware Engineering Review Board (HERB), Local Configuration Control Board (LCCB), Enterprise Configuration Control Board (ECCB), Failure/Problem Review Boards, Fleet Issues Working Group (FIWG), Engineering Working Group (EWG) and User Working Group (UWG). |
| 5.11.5 | The Contractor shall provide ORDALT Alteration Installation Team (AIT) installation services and Supply Support for parts and technical services for the ORDALT Kits in conjunction with Naval Supply Weapon Systems Support (NAVSUP WSS) and Government in-service support actions. |
| 5.11.6 | The Contractor shall assist with Government led Pre-Installation and Checkout (PICO) and document discrepancies on all cabinet areas impacted by installation of ORDALT Kits. |
| 5.11.7 | The Contractor shall develop preliminary ORDALT instructions. Contractor shall provide Pre Installation Alteration Installation Team (AIT) Workbooks. Contractor shall support Post Installation close out and delivery of AIT Workbooks. Final acceptance of the ORDALT instructions and AIT Workbooks will be conducted by the Government. |
| 5.11.8 | The Contractor shall conduct required post installation test and identify and correct any faults generated by installation of ORDALT Kits. The Contractor shall document results and corrective actions. The Contractor shall provide post installation report. |
| 5.11.9 | The Contractor shall provide harvesting, staging and shipping services for components and associated parts removed during ORDALT installations. |
| 5.12 | System Assessment Support Services |
5.12.1 The Contractor shall provide system and equipment assessment services required throughout all Q-70 life cycle including pre-deployment Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) availabilities, individual ship training cycles, Carrier Strike Group (CSG) work-ups and throughout deployment.
| 5.12.2 | The Contractor shall assist in the following types of assessments by providing recommendations for correction or repair, replacement and groom, supporting Government effective decisions on material readiness issues as shown below and as specified in the delivery/Task Orders. This is a non-exclusive list. |
| Assessment Type |
| Purpose of Assessment |
| Pre-Availability Assessment |
| Test /Assess material condition of legacy systems/sensors: determine long lead type work candidates for upcoming availabilities |
| Pre/Post Installation and Check Out |
| Pre/Post Installation and Check Out (PICO) |
| Equipment Light Off Assessment |
| Ensure delivery to Fleet of Materially ready ship at end of CNO availabilities |
| Readiness Assessment and Verification (RAV) |
| Ensure Combat System-ready ships for pre-deployment exercises |
and work-ups
| Pre/Post-Deployment Assessment |
| To baseline Q-70 Equipment upon ship’s return from deployment and to review Combat System Master Plan (CSMP) jobs for Light Off risk mitigation |
| Integrated Product Support (IPS) Assessment |
| Identify and correct supportability deficiencies to support ship's current configuration |
| Operational and maintenance assessment |
| Provide refresher/supplemental training on operations and maintenance of Q-70 Equipment. |
| Reutilization & Harvesting |
| Conduct equipment assessments prior to removal (Shipboard and/or Land Based sites). Identify LRU/Non-LRU candidates for possible harvesting and reutilization. |
6. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY
At the Government’s discretion, the Government will make available the GFM, GFE, and GFI identified below for use by the Contractor in the performance of this contract as specified in the delivery/task order.
6.1 Government Furnished Material
At the Government’s discretion, the Government will make available GFM as required and as specified in the delivery/task order.
6.2 Government Furnished Equipment
At the Government’s discretion, the Government will make available GFE as required and as specified in the delivery/task order.
6.3 Government Furnished Information
At the Government’s discretion, the Government will make available GFI as required and as specified in the delivery/task order.
6.3.1 The Government will provide the following Government-Furnished Information (GFI) upon award.
| Document Type |
| No./Version |
| Title |
| Date |
| PIDS |
| REV J |
| Prime Item Development Specification for AN/UYQ-70 |
Appendices A-Y
07 OCT 2002
| TDP |
| Q-70 CD PACKAGE |
| AN/UYQ-70 CDs |
| 10 OCT 2006 |
7. TRAVEL
7.1 Estimated travel requirements are listed below.
Trips Per Yr
(Days) Per Trip
| Washington D.C. |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 5 |
| Honolulu, HI |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| San Diego, CA |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| Mayport, FL |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| Norfolk, VA |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| Moorestown, NJ |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| Japan (Yokosuka) |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| Mayport, FL |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| Rota, Spain/Other EU |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| VA Sites (SCSC, ATRC) |
| Base/OY1/OY2/OY3/OY4 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
8. DELIVERABLES
The Contractor shall provide deliverables as described in SOW and CDRLs. Format and delivery schedule for deliverables shall be outlined in CDRLs.
| Number |
| Name |
| SOW Paragraph Reference |
| A001 |
| Contract Personnel Roster DI-MGMT-81834A |
| Paragraph 4.2.9 |
| A002 |
| Contractor’s Progress Status & Management Report DI-MGMT-80227 |
| Paragraph 5.2.3 |
| A003 |
| Technical Report - Study / Services DI-MISC-80508B |
| Paragraphs 5.5.1, 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 5.6.1, 5.6.2, 5.6.3, 5.6.4, 5.9.1, 5.9.2, 5.9.3, 5.9.4, 5.9.5, 5.9.6 |
| A004 |
| Scientific and Technical Reports (Engineering Analysis Report) DI-MISC-80711A |
| Paragraphs 5.5.1, 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 5.6.1, 5.6.2, 5.6.3, 5.6.4, 5.9.1, 5.9.2, 5.9.3, 5.9.4, 5.9.5, 5.9.6 |
| A005 |
| Obsolescence Alert Notice (DMSMS Notification Report) DI-MGMT-81941 |
| Paragraphs 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, 5.3.6 |
| A006 |
| Contractors Progress, Status & Management Report (Procurement Report) DI-MGMT-80227 |
| Paragraph 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.4.3, 5.4.4, 5.4.5, 5.4.6, 5.4.7, 5.4.8 |
| A007 |
| Scientific and Technical Reports (Acceptance Testing Report) DI-MISC-80711A |
| Paragraphs 5.6.1, 5.6.2, 5.6.3, 5.6.4, 5.10.1, 5.10.2 |
| A008 |
| Technical Data Package (TDP) DI-SESS-80776A |
| Paragraph 5.4.6, 5.7.1, 5.9.5 |
| A009 |
| Engineering Change Proposal DI-SESS-80639D |
| Paragraph 5.4.3, 5.5.1, 5.7.1, 5.7.4, 5.7.5, 5.7.6, 5.9.1 |
| A010 |
| Ordnance Alteration (ORDALT) Instruction DI-SESS-82113 |
| Paragraph 5.2.5, 5.7.1, 5.9.2, 5.11.5, 5.11.6, 5.11.7, 5.11.8, 5.11.9 |
| A011 |
| Interactive Computer Aided Provisioning System Data File Exchange (Provisioning Technical Data) DI-ALSS-81545 |
| Paragraph 5.7.1, 5.7.4 |
| A012 |
| Engineering Data for Provisioning (EDFP) [Supplemental Data for Provisioning (SDFP)] DI-SESS-81874 |
| Paragraph 5.7.1, 5.7.4 |
| A013 |
| Inventory / Utilization Data Report (Operating Environment (OE) Maintenance and Upgrades) DI-MISC-81107A |
| Paragraph 5.8.1, 5.8.2, 5.8.3 |
| A014 |
| Planned Maintenance System (PMS) Maintenance Index Page (MIP) DI-SESS-80992A |
| Paragraph 5.9.1 |
| A015 |
| Planned Maintenance System (PMS) Maintenance Requirement Card (MRC) DI-SESS-80991A |
| Paragraph 5.9.1 |
| A016 |
| Government Furnished Equipment Repair Status Report (Equipment Refurbishment Report) DI-ILSS-80620 |
| Paragraph 5.10.1, 5.10.2 |
| A017 |
| Revisions to Existing Government Documents DI-ADMN-80925 |
| Paragraph 4.1.2 |
| A018 |
| Request for Deviation (RFD) DI-CMAN-80641B |
| Paragraph 5.7.5 |
| A019 |
| Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD), Supplemental Data for Provisioning (SDFP) DI-PSSS-81716 |
| Paragraph 5.7.1 |
| A020 |
| Technical Manuals (Development Maintenance, Updates, Revisions) DI-TMSS-81701 |
| Paragraph 5.7.6 |
| A021 |
| Technical Report - Studies/Services. Lowest Replaceable Unit (LRU) Cross- Reference List DI-MISC-80508B |
| Paragraph 5.7.3 |
| A022 |
| Installation and Checkout (INCO) Spares Listing DI-SESS-81619 |
| Paragraph 5.4.2, 5.6.1 |
| A023 |
| Software Development Plan (SDP) DI-IPSC-81427B |
| Paragraph 5.7.1 |
| A024 |
| Software Design Description (SDD) DI-IPSC-81435A |
| Paragraph 5.7.1 |
| A025 |
| Contractors Configuration Management Plan (CMP) DI-SESS-80858 |
| Paragraph 5.7.1, 5.7.2, 5.7.4, 5.7.4.2, 5.11.4 |
| A026 |
| Technical Report - Study/Services AIT Workbook DI-MISC-80508 |
| Paragraph 5.2.5, 5.7.1, 5.9.2, 5.11.5, 5.11.6, 5.11.7, 5.11.8, 5.11.9 |
9. ACRONYM LIST
| AAP |
| Approved Articles Package |
| ACIS |
| Advanced Control Indicator set |
| AIT |
| Alteration Installation Team |
| ASTM |
| American Society for Testing of Materials |
| AWD |
| Air Warfare Destroyer |
| BOA |
| Basic Ordering Agreement |
| CDRL |
| Contract Data Requirement List |
| CIDS |
| Critical Item Development Specification |
| CNO |
| Chief of Naval Operations |
| COTS |
| Commercial Off-the-Shelf |
| CSM |
| Command Security Manager |
| CSMP |
| Combat System Master Plan |
| CV-TSC |
| Aircraft Carrier Tactical Support System |
| DCN |
| Document Change Notice |
| DDG 1000 |
| Zumwalt Class Guided Missile Destroyer |
| DMSMS |
| Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortage |
| DoD |
| Department of Defense |
| DSS |
| Defense Security Service |
| ECCB |
| Enterprise Configuration Control Board |
| ECN |
| Engineering Change Notice |
| ECP |
| Engineering Change Proposal |
| EDFP |
| Engineering Data for Provisioning |
| FCA |
| Functional Configuration Audit |
| FIWG |
| Fleet Issues Working Group |
| FMS |
| Foreign Military Sales |
| GFI |
| Government-Furnished Information |
| HERB |
| Hardware Engineering Review Board |
| HMI |
| Human-Machine Interface |
| HSPD |
| Homeland Security Presidential Directive |
| IEEE/EIA |
| Electrical & Electronics Engineers/Electric Industries Alliance |
| IDIQ |
| Indefinite Quantity Indefinite Delivery |
| IPS |
| Integrated Product Support |
| ISEA |
| In-Service Engineering Agent |
| IUID |
| Item Unique Identification |
| JAMOD |
| Japanese Modernization |
| LCCB |
| Local Configuration Control Board |
| LRU |
| Lowest Replaceable Unit |
| MAPP |
| Master Acquisition Program Plan |
| MDA |
| Missile Defense Agency |
| MIL-STD |
| Military Standard |
| MIPS |
| Maritime Integrated Air and Missile Defense Planning System |
| MOSA |
| Modular Open Systems Approach |
| NAVSEA |
| Naval Sea Systems Command |
| NAVSUP WSS |
| Naval Supply Weapon Systems Support |
| NDI |
| Non-Developmental Item |
| NFCS |
| Naval Fires Control System |
| NISP |
| National Industrial Security Program |
| NSWC PHD |
| Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division |
| OACE |
| Open Architecture Computing Environment |
| ORDALT |
| Ordnance Alteration |
| PCA |
| Physical Configuration Audit |
| PEO IWS |
| Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare System |
| PICO |
| Pre/Post Installation and Check Out |
| PIDS |
| Prime Item Development Specification |
| PMS |
| Planned Maintenance System |
| PRR |
| Production Readiness Review |
| PTD |
| Provisioning Technical Documentation |
| R&M |
| Reliability and Maintainability |
| RAV |
| Readiness Assessment and Verification |
| SDFP |
| Supplemental Data for Provisioning |
| SEWIP |
| Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program |
| SOP |
| Standard Operational Procedures |
| SRD |
| System Requirements Document |
| SSDS |
| Ship Self Defense System |
| TDP |
| Technical Data Package |
| UCLASS |
| Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike |
| VLS |
| Vertical Launching System |