Revised Synopsis_250513.pdf

N62742-25-R-0003 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTS AT VARIOUS

LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING

SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD

FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN.

THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in one (1) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for architectural projects at various locations under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Pacific.

These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $249,000,000.00. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000.00. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is October 2025.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 541310 – Architectural Services, with a small business size standard of $12,500,000.00. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications in accordance with the selection criteria.

Design and engineering services for architectural projects expected to be performed under this contract include, but are not limited to, the execution and delivery of Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation (DD Form 1391), Functional Analysis Concept Development (FACD)/Design Charrettes; Final Design construction documents; technical surveys and reports including site engineering investigation, topographic survey, geotechnical investigation, hazardous material survey, munitions of explosive concern (MEC) survey, Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis (CSRA), and others; construction cost estimates; Comprehensive Interior Design (CID) including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E); Collateral Equipment (CEQ) Buy Packages; and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS). PCAS consists of technical consultation during construction, including, but not limited to, review of construction submittals, response to RFIs, site visits, and other miscellaneous services. Architectural projects (also referred to herein as base development facility projects) include, but are not limited to, multi-unit dwelling/lodging complex (BEQ, BOQ, apartment, condominium, hotel, motel, dormitory), administration (office, headquarters), industrial (operations, manufacturing, maintenance, warehouse), education (school, training), retail (shopping, exchange, commissary), and community support facilities (dining facility with commercial kitchen, community/recreation center, auditorium/theater, church).

Interested firms are advised to ensure System of Award Management (SAM) registration is current at the time of offer submission and at the time of contract award. For instructions on registering with SAM, see the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov/.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that provide design or engineering services for a project under this contract cannot provide design or engineering services for the same project under a separate construction contract. The prime firm and subconsultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or to provide complete information under each criterion, may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. The following selection criteria are listed in descending order of importance:

(1) Firm’s Specialized Experience

(2) Key Personnel Professional Qualifications and Specialized Experience

(3) Past Performance

(4) Quality Control

(5) Program Management and Capacity

(6) Sustainable Design

(7) Firm Location

(8) Commitment to Small Business

(9) Volume of Work

Criterion 1 – Firm’s Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in the design of new base development facility projects, including specified design and engineering services.

Firm’s specialized experience in new base development facility projects shall include ALL of the following three (3) facility types:

(1) Administration (office, headquarters)

(2) Industrial (operations, manufacturing, maintenance, warehouse)

(3) Community Support (multi-unit dwelling/lodging complexes, BEQs, BOQs, apartments, condominiums, hotels, motels, dormitories, schools for education and/or training, retail shopping centers, exchanges, commissaries, dining facilities with commercial kitchens, recreation centers, auditoriums, theaters and churches)

New base development facility projects shall be approximately $20 million or more in construction value per project. Design of new base development facility projects shall have been completed no earlier than past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this notice.

Repair and alteration projects shall not be considered in the evaluation; only new construction projects shall qualify.

A project with multiple functions shall be considered as one base development facility project, based upon its Primary Function. For example, a commercial retail shopping complex, which also includes an administration area, shall be identified by its Primary Function; i.e., “Retail” and shall be accordingly considered as one project. Specify the Primary Function (base development facility type) for each relevant project submitted as part of the project description.

Firm’s specialized experience in specified design and engineering services shall include execution of:

(1) DD1391 or similar project programming document

(2) FACD/design charrettes

(3) Final Design construction documents

Final Design construction documents shall include Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Final Design plans and specifications and/or Final Design plans and specifications prepared by the Design-Build (DB) contractor’s Designer-of-Record. DB Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation documents shall not be considered Final Design construction documents.

Collectively, base development facility projects submitted shall demonstrate experience in ALL specified design and engineering services. Specified design and engineering services for new base development facility projects do not have to be all included within a single project scope.

Firms may be evaluated as more favorable under Selection Criterion (1) by demonstrating the following:

More variety in the types of base development facility projects Base development facility projects within Hawaii, Guam, Tinian, Diego Garcia, Australia, Japan, Korea, Papua New Guinea and other Pacific Ocean areas Base development facility projects that contain several of the specified design and engineering services may be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only one of these services.

Criterion 1 Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section F. Submit a maximum of five (5) projects which best demonstrate the firm’s relevant specialized experience in the design of new base development facility projects AND the specified design and engineering services, described above. If more than five (5) projects are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first five (5) projects listed in Part I, Section F and disregard any other project information.

All projects provided in the SF330 must have been completed by the actual office/branch/regional office proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation.

To enable verification, firms should include the Unique Entity Identifier number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, Block 25, “Firm Name”. Do not use abbreviations or nicknames. In Block 21, include (1) project title, contract number, or project identification number, and (2) location. Block 22 shall include (3) the date design and engineering services and construction completed. Block 23a shall include (4) project owner. Block 23b shall include (5) point-of-contact name and e-mail address. Block 23c shall include (6) the point-of-contact phone number. Block 24 shall include (7) the project description; (8) the Primary Function; (9) contract performance period; (10) original construction contract award amount; (11) final construction contract amount; and (12) a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as described above.

The submission shall include a discussion of who executed the project as pertinent to demonstrating specialized experience. For projects performed as a subcontractor, a joint venture or a limited liability company (LLC) involving different partners or member companies, specifically indicate the percentage of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

If the firm is a joint venture or an LLC, projects performed by the joint venture or LLC should be submitted. However, if there are no relevant projects performed by the joint venture or LLC, projects may be submitted for either joint venture partner or LLC member company, not to exceed a total of five (5) relevant projects.

A subcontractor's or sub-consultant's specialized experience on a design-bid-build project will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the joint venture partner(s)/LLC member company.

For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract.

All information for Selection Criterion (1) shall be submitted in the SF 330, Part I, Section F.

The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part I, Section F in evaluation of Selection Criterion (1).

Criterion 2 – Key Personnel Professional Qualifications and Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I Sections E & G):

Firm’s key personnel will be evaluated for professional qualifications, and specialized experience and technical competence to accomplish the tasks required under this contact.

(a) Professional Qualifications: Professional qualifications of key personnel proposed for three (3) design teams.

Criterion (2)(a) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section G. Identify key personnel for three (3) design teams proposed for the design of new base development facility projects. See Selection Criteria (1) for description of base development facility projects. Key personnel for each team shall be limited to the following:

Principal-in-Charge of the prime A-E firm Project Manager or Project Architect Civil Project Engineer Structural Project Engineer Mechanical Project Engineer Electrical Project Engineer Fire Protection Project Engineer Cost Estimator

If more than three (3) design teams are submitted, the Government will only evaluate the first (3) design teams and will disregard any design teams submitted after the first (3) design teams.

SF330, Part I, Section E. Submit professional qualifications for these key personnel, including active U.S. professional registration (include State and discipline), number of years of professional experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. For Cost Estimator, indicate years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. Professional registration for Cost Estimator is not required. Professional qualifications of other than the key personnel shall not be submitted, and if submitted, shall not be considered in the evaluation.

(b) Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Key personnel specialized experience and technical competence in the design of new base development facility projects, including specified design and engineering services (see Selection Criterion (1) for description). Repair and alteration projects shall not be considered in the evaluation;

only new construction projects shall qualify.

Key personnel may be evaluated as more favorable under Selection Criterion (2) by demonstrating the following:

More variety in the types of base development facility projects Base development facility projects within Hawaii, Guam, Tinian, Diego Garcia, Australia, Japan, Korea, Papua New Guinea and other Pacific Ocean areas

Base development facility projects that contain several of the specified design and engineering services may be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only one of these services.

Criterion (2)(b) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Specialized experience and technical competence shall be limited to the Project Managers or Project Architects on the three (3) proposed design teams. Relevant project information for other key personnel on these teams is not required and if submitted, will not be considered in the evaluation. For key personnel other than the Project Managers or Project Architects, complete Blocks 12 through 18; and leave Block 19, Relevant Projects, blank.

Complete Section E in its entirety for each Project Manager or Project Architect. Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant projects for each Project Manager or Project Architect, demonstrating specialized experience and technical competence in the design of new base development facilities, including specified design and engineering services. If more than five (5) projects for each Project Manager or Project Architect are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first five (5) projects listed in Part I, Section E and disregard any other project information.

Each project shall include project title and location, Primary Function [see Section Criterion (1) for description of Primary Function], date professional services and construction completed, point-of-contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance, contract award amount, construction price, and the role and work performed by the Project Manager or Project Architect demonstrating relevance to specialized experience. Experience in a role other than Project Manager or Project Architect for project submitted will not qualify as specialized experience and technical competence. If project description does not clearly define the work performed by the Project Manager or Project Architect (including specialized design and engineering services) or if a project does not include the requested data, that project may be evaluated as less favorable or less qualified.

Criterion 3 – Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance on relevant projects with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, stakeholder/customer satisfaction, and small business utilization. Evaluation of past performance will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Selection Criterion (1) relevant projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government.

Criterion 3 Submission Requirements:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) or AE Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the SF330 for each project included in Criterion (1). If there is not a completed CPARS or ACASS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ - Attachment A) for each project included in Criterion (1). PPQs will not be accepted from the designer on a design-build project or from a prime contractor for work performed by a subcontractor. PPQs shall be completed and signed by the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for construction contract administration. The Offeror shall provide completed PPQs in the proposal. Offeror’s may submit PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations as long as complete, required information is included.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion (1). Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) 8.5” x 11”, 1” margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 4 – Quality Control (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the processes and procedures of their proposed internal design quality control programs that ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their subconsultants/subcontractors.

Criterion 4 Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Describe the design quality control organization structure that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F, or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract, including checking documents for errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and quality;

tracking and incorporating review comments; and implementing the latest criteria and lessons learned.

4. Describe how the prime AE will ensure quality consistently across the entire team, and how quality of subcontractor’s work is assured.

5. Describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate the level of effectiveness.

6. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program, and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

7. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

Criterion 5 – Program Management and Capacity (SF330 , Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on their ability to plan for and manage work under the contract and their capacity to accomplish multiple large projects concurrently within the required timeframe.

Selection Criterion 5 Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part 1, Section H.

1. Provide an organizational chart for the three (3) design teams proposed per Selection Criterion (2). Identify composition for these three (3) teams, including design firms prime AE, subcontractors/subconsultants of major design disciplines (architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, cost estimates), other required design and engineering services and design personnel.

2. Discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization.

Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

Address how the firm's organizational construct is most efficient and effective in the execution of work. For all key personnel identified in Selection Criterion (2), explain their roles and responsibilities in the proposed organization. If the same key personnel is proposed for more than one (1) design team, provide explanation substantiating such designation and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently.

3. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project teams (including subconsultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

Criterion 6 —Sustainable Design (SF330, Part I, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integral design approach and designing in accordance with recognized sustainability rating systems such as Green Globe, LEED, etc.

Submission Requirements:

Identify examples indicating design team (including consultants) experience and concepts employed, certification awarded, and accredited professionals proposed for this contract. For projects certified, submit a copy of the certificate (certificates are not included toward the overall page count).

Criterion 7 – Firm Location (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily Hawaii and Guam.

Criterion 7 Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Indicate the location of the office(s) that will be performing the work including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members/subconsultants, and include description(s) of staffing and functions for each office.

Describe the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract.

Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support.

Criterion 8 – Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which they have identified and committed to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone SB), Veteran- Owned Small Business (VOSB), and Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement. In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Large Businesses shall submit “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for contracts associated with each project cited under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT, they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports were not applicable to the Section F projects, large businesses shall submit other documentation, which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for the contracts. Small Businesses shall also submit documentation, which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify, commit to and demonstrate in the plan to meet the following goals:

Small Business – 50% HUBZone – 3% Veteran-Owned Small Business – 1% Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business – 1% Small Disadvantaged Business – 5% Women-Owned Small Business – 9%

If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFAR 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses;

however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, VOSB, and SDVOSB if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541310, Architectural Services, size standard $12.5 million.

The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment (B)) shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

All firms shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience, in the format provided in Attachment C, Small Business Subcontracting Record.

All firms shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment D, Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

Submission requirements:

1. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the firm will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

2. Include supplemental narratives (shall not exceed five single-sided pages) to address other elements of the firm’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

3. The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition (i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the contract value. Firms are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment D consistent with efficient contract performance. Firms shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources. If the firm is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.

Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.

Criterion 9 – Volume of Work

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System. Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified AE firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD AE contracts.

Selection Criterion (89) Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this selection criterion.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF- 330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one-sided, at least 11 point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 200 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Part II, shall be submitted for each firm identified in Part I, Section C. Please include your Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330.

**In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b), contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Firms who are offering as a limited liability company (LLC) should include with their submission a copy of the operating agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement or operating agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture or LLC shall include with their submission a copy of the joint venture or operating agreement along with a detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

The structure and decision making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

Identify by name and title the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents)

A list of partners/parties, to include company name, UEI and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, Email address, and phone number and facsimile number.

Architect-engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit one (1) Original and three (3) paper copies of the SF-330 and one (1) CD to:

For SF330s sent via United States Postal Services (USPS):

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific Code CON31 (N62742-25-R-0003), Attn: WO 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100

JBPHH, HI 96860-3134

For SF330s sent via courier service or hand-delivered:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific Code CON31 (N62742-25-R-0003), Attn: WO 4256 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

AE firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit an SF- 330 package that addresses each requirement within the selection criteria. The SF-330 package submitted in response to this announcement must include (1) original and three (3) paper copies, and one (1) CD of the completed SF330.

Firms responding to this announcement by 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) on 03 June 2025 will be considered. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The main point of contact is Wanda Okemura, Contract Specialist, at wanda.l.okemura.civ@us.navy.mil. The alternate point of contact is Erik S. Torngren, Contracting Officer, at erik.s.torngren.civ@us.navy.mil.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to wanda.l.okemura.civ@us.navy.mil and erik.s.torngren.civ@us.navy.mil no later than fifteen (15) days of the closing date. Questions submitted after this date may not be addressed by the Government due to time constraints.