Synopsis 22R0001 Revision 1_211025.pdf

N62742-22-R-0001 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTS AT VARIOUS

LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING

SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD

FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN.

THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in one (1) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for architectural projects at various locations under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Pacific.

These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $50,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is May 2022.

This proposed contract is being solicited as a 100% small business set-aside. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 541310 – Architectural Services, with a small business size standard of $8,000,000. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications in accordance with the selection criteria.

Design and engineering services for architectural projects expected to be performed under this contract include, but are not limited to, the execution and delivery of Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation (DD Form 1391), Functional Analysis Concept Development (FACD)/Design Charrettes; Final Design construction documents; technical surveys and reports including site engineering investigation, topographic survey, geotechnical investigation, hazardous material survey, munitions of explosive concern (MEC) survey, Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis (CSRA), and others; construction cost estimates; Comprehensive Interior Design (CID) including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E); Collateral Equipment (CEQ) Buy Packages; and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS). PCAS consists of technical consultation during construction, including, but not limited to, review of construction submittals, response to RFIs, site visits, and other miscellaneous services. Architectural projects consists of new base development facility projects, including bachelor enlisted quarters/bachelor officer quarters, headquarters building, administration/office building, operations facility, manufacturing facility, maintenance facility, warehouse, school, training facility, retail/commercial facility, dining facility with commercial kitchen, community/recreation center, auditorium/theater, and church.

All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website at https://www.sam.gov.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that provide design or engineering services for a project under this contract cannot provide design or engineering services for the same project under a separate construction contract. The prime firm and subconsultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications.

The contract will require that the selected AE firm have e-mail and internet access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for AE services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering. Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or to provide complete information under each criterion, may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. The following selection criteria are listed in descending order of importance:

(1) Firm’s Specialized Experience

(2) Key Personnel Professional Qualifications, and Specialized Experience and Technical

Competence

(3) Past Performance

(4) Quality Control Program

(5) Program Management and Capacity

(6) Sustainable Design

(7) Firm Location

(8) Volume of Work

SELECTION CRITERION (1): FIRM’S SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in the design of new base development facility projects, including specified design and engineering services. Repair and alteration projects shall not be considered in the evaluation; only new construction projects shall qualify. New base development facility projects shall be approximately $20 million or more in construction value per project. Construction of new base development facility projects shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this notice.

Relevant base development facility projects shall include new bachelor enlisted quarters/bachelor officer quarters, headquarters building, administration/office building, operations facility, manufacturing facility, maintenance facility, warehouse, school, training facility, retail/commercial facility, dining facility with commercial kitchen, community/recreation center, auditorium/theater, and church.

A project with multiple functions shall be considered as one base development facility project, based upon its Primary Function. For example, a commercial retail shopping complex, which also includes an administration area, shall be identified by its Primary Function; i.e., “Retail/Commercial Facility” and shall be accordingly considered as one project. Specify the Primary Function (base development facility type) for each relevant project submitted as part of the project description.

Firm’s specialized experience in specified design and engineering services shall include execution of:

(1) DD1391 or similar project programming document

(2) FACD/design charrettes

(3) Final Design construction documents

Collectively, base development facility projects submitted shall demonstrate experience in ALL specified design and engineering services. Specified design and engineering services for new base development facility projects do not have to be all included within a single project scope.

Final Design construction documents shall include Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Final Design plans and specifications and/or Final Design plans and specifications prepared by the Design-Build (DB) contractor’s Designer-of-Record. DB Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation documents shall not be considered Final Design construction documents.

Firms may be evaluated as more favorable under Selection Criterion (1) by demonstrating the following:

More variety in the types of base development facility projects Base development facility projects in tropical environments similar to Guam and Hawaii

(subject to high winds and high humidity/corrosion)

Base development facility projects that contain several of the specified design and engineering services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only one of these services.

Selection Criterion (1) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section F. Submit a maximum of seven (7) relevant projects, approximately $20 million or more in construction value per project, construction completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this notice, which best demonstrate the firm’s recent specialized experience in the design of new base development facility projects AND the specified design and engineering services, described above. If more than seven (7) projects are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first seven (7) projects listed in Part I, Section F and disregard any other project information.

All projects provided in the SF330 must have been completed by the actual office/branch/regional office proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation.

To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, Block 25, “Firm Name”. Do not use abbreviations or nicknames. In Block 21, include (1) project title, contract number, or project identification number, and (2) location. Block 22 shall include (3) the date design and engineering services and construction completed. Block 23a shall include (4) project owner. Block 23b shall include (5) point-of-contact name and e-mail address. Block 23c shall include (6) the point-of-contact phone number.

Block 24 shall include (7) the project description; (8) the Primary Function; (9) contract performance period; (10) original construction contract award amount; (11) final construction contract amount; and (12) a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as described above.

The submission shall include a discussion of who executed the project as pertinent to demonstrating specialized experience. For projects performed as a subcontractor, a joint venture or a limited liability company (LLC) involving different partners or member companies, specifically indicate the percentage of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

If the firm is a joint venture or an LLC, projects performed by the joint venture or LLC should be submitted. However, if there are no relevant projects performed by the joint venture or LLC, projects may be submitted for either joint venture partner or LLC member company, not to exceed a total of seven (7) relevant projects.

A subcontractor's or sub-consultant's specialized experience on a design-bid-build project will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the joint venture partner(s).

For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract.

All information for Selection Criterion (1) shall be submitted in the SF 330, Part I, Section F.

The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part I, Section F in evaluation of Selection Criterion (1).

SELECTION CRITERION (2): KEY PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL

QUALIFICATIONS, AND SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL

COMPETENCE

Firm’s key personnel will be evaluated for professional qualifications, and specialized experience and technical competence to accomplish the tasks required under this contact.

(a) Professional Qualifications: Professional qualifications of key personnel proposed for two (2) design teams.

Selection Criterion (2)(a) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Identify key personnel for two (2) design teams proposed for the design of new base development facility projects. See Selection Criteria (1) for description of base development facility projects. Key personnel for each team shall be limited to the following:

Principal-in-Charge of the prime A-E firm Project Manager or Project Architect Civil Project Engineer Structural Project Engineer Mechanical Project Engineer Electrical Project Engineer Fire Protection Project Engineer Cost Estimator

If more than two (2) design teams are submitted, the Government will only evaluate the first two

(2) design teams and will disregard any design teams submitted after the first two (2) design teams.

SF330, Part I, Section E. Submit professional qualifications for these key personnel, including active U.S. professional registration (include State/Territory and discipline), number of years of professional experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. For Cost Estimator, indicate years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. Professional registration for Cost Estimator is not required. Professional qualifications of personnel of the design teams other than the key personnel (e.g., Architect, Structural Engineer, Civil Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Fire Protection Engineer, Environmental Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Topographic Surveyor, etc.) shall not be submitted, and if submitted, shall not be considered in the evaluation.

(b) Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Key personnel specialized experience and technical competence in the design of new base development facility projects, including specified design and engineering services. New base development facility projects shall be approximately $20 million or more in construction value per project. Construction of new base development facility projects shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this notice.

Relevant base development facility projects shall include Relevant base development facility projects shall include new bachelor enlisted quarters/bachelor officer quarters, headquarters building, administration/office building, operations facility, manufacturing facility, maintenance facility, warehouse, school, training facility, retail/commercial facility, dining facility with commercial kitchen, community/recreation center, auditorium/theater, and church. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. Repair and alteration projects shall not be considered in the evaluation; only new construction projects shall qualify. Specified design and engineering services shall include execution of (1) DD1391 or similar project programming document, (2) FACD/design charrettes, and (3) Final Design construction documents. Final Design construction documents shall include Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Final Design plans and specifications and/or Final Design plans and specifications prepared by the Design-Build (DB) contractor’s Designer-of-Record.

DB Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation documents shall not be considered Final Design construction documents. Collectively, base development facility projects submitted shall demonstrate experience in ALL specified design and engineering services. Specified design and engineering services for new base development facility projects do not have to be all included within a single project scope; however, base development facility projects that contain several of these services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only one of these services. Base development facility projects designed and constructed in tropical environments similar to Guam and Hawaii (subject to high winds and corrosion) will be considered more favorably.

Selection Criterion (2)(b) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Specialized experience and technical competence shall be limited to the Project Managers or Project Architects on the two (2) proposed design teams. Relevant project information for other key personnel on these teams is not required and if submitted, will not be considered in the evaluation. For key personnel other than the Project Managers or Project Architects, complete Blocks 12 through 18; and leave Block 19, Relevant Projects, blank.

Complete Section E for each Project Manager or Project Architect, providing all requested information. Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant projects for each Project Manager or Project Architect, demonstrating specialized experience and technical competence in relevant projects.

If more than five (5) projects for each Project Manager or Project Architect are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first five (5) projects listed in Part I, Section E and disregard any other project information.

Each project shall include project title and location, Primary Function [see Section Criterion (1) for description of Primary Function], year professional services and construction completed, point-of-contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance, contract award amount, estimated construction cost, and the role and work performed by the Project Manager or Project Architect demonstrating relevance to specialized experience. Experience in a role other than Project Manager or Project Architect for project submitted will not qualify as specialized experience and technical competence. If project description does not clearly define the work performed by the Project Manager or Project Architect (including specialized design and engineering services) or if a project does not include the requested data, that project may be evaluated as less favorable or less qualified.

SELECTION CRITERION (3): PAST PERFORMANCE

Firms will be evaluated on past performance on relevant projects with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, stakeholder/customer satisfaction, and small business utilization. Evaluation of past performance will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Selection Criterion (1) relevant projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government. [Note: Past performance information for relevant projects listed under Selection Criterion (1) may be given greater weight.]

Selection Criterion (3) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section H. For each relevant project submitted in response to Selection Criterion (1), Firm’s Specialized Experience, submit a DD2631, Performance Evaluation (Architect- Engineer) or Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) Architect-Engineer evaluation.

If a DD2631 or CPAR is not available, submit a NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), included with this announcement as Attachment A, with the SF330.

Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Do not submit a PPQ when a completed DD2631 or CPAR is available. NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a Design-Build project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. If work was performed as a subcontractor for a project under Selection Criterion (1), provide a completed Past Performance Questionnaire.

NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire previously completed for other announcements/RFPs may also be submitted.

The information provided in the SF330 may provide the major portion of the information used in the Government’s evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided in the SF330 and may use other sources to assess past performance information such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and inquiries with previous customers/owners. PPIRS will be evaluated for the firm that will perform the work and search will be based upon the CAGE/DUNS number provided for the firm.

If the AE received any less than Satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners for projects submitted under Selection Criterion (1), it is incumbent upon the AE to provide an explanation of the rating, problems encountered, the corrective actions taken on the project, and what will be done to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts.

Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single sided pages) in total, and will be counted as part of the maximum number of pages allowed for Part I.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

SELECTION CRITERION (4): QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

Firms will be evaluated on the processes and procedures of their proposed internal design quality control programs that ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their subconsultants/subcontractors.

Selection Criterion (4) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Describe the design quality control organization structure that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F, or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract, including checking documents for errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and quality;

tracking and incorporating review comments; and implementing the latest criteria and lessons learned.

4. Describe how the prime AE will ensure quality consistently across the entire team, and how quality of subcontractor’s work is assured.

5. Describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate the level of effectiveness.

6. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program, and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

7. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

SELECTION CRITERION (5): PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND CAPACITY

Firms will be evaluated on their ability to plan for and manage work under the contract and their capacity to accomplish multiple large projects concurrently within the required timeframe.

Selection Criterion (5) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part 1, Section H.

1. Provide an organizational chart for the two (2) design teams proposed per Selection Criterion (2). Identify composition for these two (2) teams, including design firms [prime AE, subcontractors/subconsultants of major design disciplines (architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, cost estimates), other required design and engineering services] and design personnel [key personnel per Selection Criterion (2) and other major roles of major design disciplines].

2. Discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization.

Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

Address how the firm's organizational construct is most efficient and effective in the execution of work. For all key personnel identified in Selection Criterion (2), explain their roles and responsibilities in the proposed organization. If the same key personnel is proposed for more than one (1) design team, provide explanation substantiating such designation and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently.

3. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project teams (including subconsultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

SELECTION CRITERION (6): SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

Firms will be evaluated on their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integrated design approach and in designing in accordance with sustainable design rating systems leading to third party certification.

SELECTION CRITERION (6) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Provide a maximum of three (3) projects that have attained or been submitted for sustainable design third party certification (LEED, Green Globes, Guiding Principles Compliance, Guiding Principles Assessment, or other equivalent certification). For projects not yet certified, identify the date the project was submitted. For all projects, identify the team’s major contributions (design elements, features, equipment, etc.) in attainment of the certification. If more than three projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first three projects and disregard any other project information after the first three projects. Certified projects will be evaluated as more favorable in comparison to projects that are not yet certified. Discuss key sustainable design personnel experience and qualifications.

SELECTION CRITERION (7): FIRM LOCATION

Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily Hawaii and Guam.

SELECTION CRITERION (7) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Indicate the location of the office(s) within Hawaii and Guam that will be performing the work including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members/subconsultants, and include description(s) of staffing and functions for each office.

Describe the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract.

Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support.

SELECTION CRITERION (8): VOLUME OF WORK

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System. Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified AE firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD AE contracts.

Selection Criterion (8) Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this selection criterion.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

AE firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 330 package, AE Qualifications, which addresses each requirement within the selection criteria. The printed format shall be in an 8-1/2 x 11 paper format, bound in a 3-ring binder, typed with a minimum 11-point font size or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables), and one-sided. Part I shall not exceed 200 single–sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. Except for the Organization Chart, sheets larger than 8-1/2” X 11” including fold-out sheets will not be accepted. Part II, shall be submitted for each firm identified in Part I, Section C. Please include your DUNS and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered.

In addition to the information provided in the SF330, provide the CAGE and DUNS number for each member of the proposed team. Joint Ventures (JV), Limited Liability Partnerships (LLP), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), and Limited Companies (LTD) shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

a. A copy of the JV, LLP, LLC, or LTD agreement. Failure to include the applicable agreement with the SF330 may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate -

(1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

(2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

(3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

(4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents).

c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, email address, phone number and facsimile number.

AE firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit an SF- 330 package that addresses each requirement within the selection criteria. The SF-330 package submitted in response to this announcement must include (1) original and three (3) paper copies, and one (1) CD of the completed SF330.

The delivery addresses for SF 330s are as follows:

(1) For SF 330s sent via Mail:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Attn: Jamie Ikeda, Contract Specialist, CON31 (N62742-22-R-0001) 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100

JBPHH, HI 96860-3134

Phone Number: (808) 474-5719 E-mail Address: jamie.ikeda@navy.mil

(2) For SF 330s sent via courier service or hand-delivered:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Attn: Jamie Ikeda, Contract Specialist, CON31 (N62742-22-R-0001) 4256 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296 Phone Number: (808) 474-5719 E-mail Address: jamie.ikeda@navy.mil

Notifications will be sent via email to the email address identified in Part I, Section B, Block 8.

Firms responding to this announcement shall submit an SF-330 package by 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) on 8 November 2021. Late responses will be handled in accordance with

FAR 52.215-1. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

The main point of contact is Jamie Ikeda, Contract Specialist, at jamie.ikeda@navy.mil. The alternative point of contact is Erik Torngren, Contracting Officer, at erik.torngren@navy.mil.

All questions should be submitted in writing to include solicitation number and forwarded via e-mail to jamie.ikeda@navy.mil, no later than 15 days of the closing date. Questions submitted after this date may not be addressed by the Government due to time constraints.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

All potential offerors are advised to check the SAM web site https://www.sam.gov for information pertaining to this announcement. It is the offerors responsibility to check the SAM website periodically for any modifications to the announcement.

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.