18-2466,_Amendment_No._0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES, OAHU, HAWAII

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-Dec-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247818R2466

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Dec-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Dec-2017

CODE

NAVFAC HAWAII

SERVICES ACQUISITION DIVISION (PRJ233)

400 MARSHALL ROAD

JBPHH HI 96860-3139

N62478 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247818R2466

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES (REVISED)

SECTION C

Annex 1502000 - Replace Page 6 with the attached Page 6 (Amendment No. 0001).

SECTION J

Table of Contents - Replace Page J-0200000-TOC, Page 1 with the attached Page 1 (Amendment No.

0001).

Attachment J-0200000-03 - Replace Page 2 with the attached Page 2 (Amendment No. 0001).

SECTION L

Insert Attachment L-1, Pages 1 and 2 (Amendment No. 0001).

Insert Attachment L-2, Page 1 (Amendment No. 0001).

Insert Attachment L-3, Pages 1 through 4 (Amendment No. 0001).

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

5252.215-9300, CONTENT OF PROPOSALS (MAR 2002)

a. General submittal requirements. Submit two sets of the price and non-price proposals as indicated below:

(1) One compact diskette (CD).

The complete price and non-price proposals, separated into two folders, entitled “Price Proposal” and “Non-price Proposal.” The non-price proposal shall not contain any cost/pricing information.

(2) One hard copy.

(a) Standard Form 33 with an original signature.

(b) Copy of the complete price and non-price proposals, printed from the CD. The Government will use the hard copy only if the CD is corrupt or unreadable.

b. Price Proposal. The price proposal shall include the following:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(a) Standard Form 33;

(1) Ensure Blocks 15 through 17 of the SF33 are completed as follows:

(a) Individuals doing business as a firm - Signed by that individual, and the signature shall be followed by the individual's typed, stamped, or printed name and the words, "an individual doing business as _________" [insert name of firm].

(b) Partnerships - Signed in the partnership name.

(c) Corporations - Signed in the corporate name, followed by the word "by" and the signature and title of the person authorized to sign.

(d) Joint Ventures - Signed by each participant in the joint venture in the manner prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (c) above for each type of participant.

(e) Limited Liability Corporation (LLC) – Signed in the LLC name, followed by the word “by” and the signature of the member authorized to sign.

(2) If the offeror delegates this authority to an individual or position, the offeror must submit a Delegation of Authority letter signed by someone authorized to delegate, along with a corporate statement (e.g., by-laws, corporate resolution) showing that the delegator is authorized to delegate this authority to the person signing the form.

(b) Acknowledgment of all amendments issued for this RFP;

(c) One compact diskette (CD) containing Section B Prices and Attachments J-0200000-12 through J-0200000-16, using the “Offeror Pricing Schedules” Microsoft Office Excel (excel) file. Offerors shall not use their own forms or alter the excel file document. Do not convert the excel file to an Adobe Acrobat file. Submit as an excel file completing the excel file as follows and DO NOT SUBMIT A HARD COPY OF THE EXCEL

FILE.

(1) Complete only the last columns on the excel file entitled, “OFFEROR PROPOSED UNIT PRICE.” Limit unit prices to two decimal places. The “Unit Price” column will fill in automatically and will round to two decimal places. The “Total” column will fill in automatically, rounded to two decimal places, by multiplying the quantity by the unit price.

(2) Section B Prices. The Amounts for each Contract Line Item No. will be filled in automatically from Attachments J-0200000-12 through J-0200000-16.

(d) Contractor Information;

(e) Section K, Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors;

(f) DFARS 252.204-7007, Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications, which requires the offeror to complete the annual representations and certifications electronically via the sam.gov website at https://www.sam.gov. Ensure you also complete the DFARS provisions;

(g) Evidence of submission of VETS-4212 Report, entitled “Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (VETS-4212 Report),” as required by FAR 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans. (If not applicable, provide statement that Offeror has not had contracts subject to this requirement.);

(h) CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate);

(i) Joint Venture Agreement (if submitting proposal as a joint venture); and

(j) Most current balance sheet for a full year, which provides evidence of working capital sufficient to cover two months of the Recurring Work amount for Contract Line Item No. 0001. Lines of credit may also be submitted. Balance sheets for subcontractors will not be considered.

c. Non-price Proposal. The non-price proposal shall include the following:

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) Submit Attachment L-1, “Corporate Experience List.” Include all maintenance and repair of fire protection and alarm systems (Fire Protection Systems, Automatic Sprinkler Systems, Foam Extinguishing Systems, FM-200 Fire Suppression Systems, Kitchen Fire Suppression Systems), service call work (emergency, urgent and routine service calls), and preventive maintenance for all fire protection and fire alarm system contracts and subcontracts for your firm, which were completed no more than seven years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation, or are currently in progress, and valued at $200,000 or more per year. The dollar value is based on the amount for standalone projects or multiple projects that collectively equate to $200,000 or more per year and were on-going concurrently. Contracts listed may include those entered into with Federal, State, or local governmental agencies, as well as contracts with commercial entities. Submit a separate list for each subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement.

(2) If the evaluation of your Corporate Experience List (your firm's and your subcontractors') does not result in an Acceptable rating for Corporate Experience, the Government will consider the experience of your (your firm’s and your subcontractors’) Project Manager and Quality Manager. Submit Attachment L-2, “Key Personnel Experience List.” Include your Project Manager’s and Quality Manager’s relevant management experience for projects for maintenance and repair of fire protection and alarm systems (Fire Protection Systems, Automatic Sprinkler Systems, Foam Extinguishing Systems, FM-200 Fire Suppression Systems, Kitchen Fire Suppression Systems), service call work (emergency, urgent and routine service calls), and preventive maintenance for all fire protection and fire alarm system contracts and subcontracts), which were completed no more than seven years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation, or are currently in progress, and valued at $200,000 or more per year. The dollar value is based on the amount for standalone projects or multiple projects that collectively equate to $200,000 or more per year and were on-going concurrently. The Project Manager and Quality Manager shall each have at least three years of relevant management experience. You must submit the “Key Personnel Experience List” for both the Project Manager and Quality Manager. If you submit the list for only one position, it will not be considered.

(2) Factor 2, Safety

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (January 2015-December 2017). This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror shall submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or equivalent rate for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and provide an explanation. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends must be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (January 2015-December 2017). If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and provide an explanation. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA, DART, and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.

The offeror shall describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contractor shall describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(3) Factor 3, Licenses and Certifications

Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall provide evidence of current NICET Level III licensing and certification(s) per Section C, 1502000, Spec Item 2.2.1, for each employee who will perform testing, inspection, and maintenance services.

(4) Factor 4, Past Performance

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Offeror shall submit the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience).

AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

(2) IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Offeror shall ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment L-3), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Ms. S. Sekiguchi, via email at sandy.sekiguchi@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

(3) Offerors may also include performance recognition documents such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition if they were received within the last seven years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation.

(4) In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

(5) While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

d. Each offeror shall address and submit, as a minimum, ALL items required by the paragraphs above.

Failure to include a portion of any required item may render the proposal ineligible for award.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

a. The major evaluation criteria are Price and Non-price.

b. The distinction between Corporate Experience and Past Performance is Corporate Experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of value, scope, and complexity. Past Performance relates to how well a contractor has performed.

c. Price Proposal.

Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(1) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(2) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(3) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(4) Comparison of market survey results.

d. Non-price Proposal.

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s relevant corporate experience on maintenance and repair of fire protection and alarm systems (Fire Protection Systems, Automatic Sprinkler Systems, Foam Extinguishing Systems, FM-200 Fire Suppression Systems, Kitchen Fire Suppression Systems), service call work (emergency, urgent and routine service calls), and preventive maintenance for all fire protection and fire alarm system contracts and subcontracts utilizing the “Corporate Experience List,” and Program Manager and Quality Manager relevant experience, to assess an offeror’s qualifications to manage and complete the requirements of the solicitation. The Government will consider Project Manager and Quality Manager experience (using the attachment entitled, “Key Personnel Experience List”) if its evaluation of the Corporate Experience List does not result in an Acceptable rating for Corporate Experience. The Government will consider Corporate Experience and Key Personnel Experience of subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the acquisition.

(a) A contract or subcontract will be considered relevant if

(1) it was similar in scope to the subject solicitation (i.e., maintenance and repair of fire protection and alarm systems (Fire Protection Systems, Automatic Sprinkler Systems, Foam Extinguishing Systems, FM-200 Fire Suppression Systems, Kitchen Fire Suppression Systems), service call work (emergency, urgent and routine service calls), and preventive maintenance for all fire protection and fire alarm system contracts and subcontracts), and

(2) it was completed no more than seven years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation, or is currently in progress, and

(3) it was valued at $200,000 or more per year. The dollar value is based on the amount for standalone projects or multiple projects that collectively equate to $200,000 or more per year and were on-going concurrently.

(b) The experience of your firm’s and your subcontractors’ firm’s Project Manager and Quality Manager will be considered relevant if

(1) The Project Manager and Quality Manager each have at least three years of relevant management experience for projects:

(i) Similar in scope to the subject solicitation (i.e., maintenance and repair of fire protection and alarm systems (Fire Protection Systems, Automatic Sprinkler Systems, Foam Extinguishing Systems, FM-200 Fire Suppression Systems, Kitchen Fire Suppression Systems), service call work (emergency, urgent and routine service calls), and preventive maintenance for all fire protection and fire alarm system contracts and subcontracts), and

(ii) Completed no more than seven years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation, or are currently in progress, and

(iii) Valued at $200,000 or more per year. The dollar value is based on the amount for standalone projects or multiple projects that collectively equate to $200,000 or more per year and were on-going concurrently.

(2) You submit the “Key Personnel Experience List” for both the Project Manager and Quality Manager. If you submit the list for only one position, it will not be considered.

(2) Factor 2, Safety

Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total

Recordable Case (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): The Offeror shall submit EMR for the three previous complete calendar years (January 2015-December 2017). If no EMR exists, the offeror shall submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. If the offeror has no EMR or equivalent rate for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and provide an explanation. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends must be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(b) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: The Offeror shall submit their OSHA DART and TRC rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, for the three previous complete calendar years (January 2015-December 2017). If the Offeror is unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, the Offeror must affirmatively state so, and provide an explanation. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends must be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(c) Technical Approach to Safety: The Offeror shall describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. The Offeror shall also describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(d) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety that the Government may review include, but are not limited to, OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

(3) Factor 3, Licenses and Certifications

Basis of Evaluation: The Offeror provided evidence of current NICET Level III licensing and certification(s) per Section C, 1502000, Spec Item 2.2.1, for each employee who will perform testing, inspection, and maintenance services.

(4) Factor 4, Past Performance

Basis of Evaluation: The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained for any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.);

- Tasks that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand; and

- A respect for stewardship of Government funds

(End of Summary of Changes)

1502000 – Facility Investment Spec Item

Title Performance Objective

Related Information Performance Standard

3 Recurring Work The Contractor shall maintain, repair, and alter facilities, installed equipment and systems to ensure they are fully functional and in normal working condition.

The Contractor shall develop, implement, and execute a Service Order, Maintenance Program, Inspection, Testing, and Certification Program, to maintain and repair facilities, equipment and systems in accordance with UFC 3-601- 02.

The Contractor shall maintain all maintenance, repair, and alteration data and warranty records in the technical library in accordance with Annex 2.

The Contractor shall provide all necessary test instruments, equipment, and tools required to perform maintenance and repair.

Site maps are provided in J- 1502000-01.

For an overall list of the Facilities and Equipment, see J- 1502000-14 Facilities and Equipment Summary Table.

The current facility inventory for FI is provided in:

J-1502000-02, J-1502000-05, J-1502000-08, J-1502000-10 and J-1502000-11. Frequencies annotated on inventories are provided for historical information only. Frequencies for maintenance, inspection and testing should be performed in accordance with UFC 3-601- 02.

Reference/as-built drawings for fire protection and alarm systems for Fleet Logistics Center are available upon request for information only.

The Government makes no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of these drawings. All changes to

Facilities, equipment and systems are in normal working condition and function properly in accordance with specified standards.

14-18-2466 1502000, Page 6 of 17 (Amendment No. 0001)

SECTION J

DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT

NUMBER

ATTACHMENT TITLE

J-0200000-01 Definitions and Acronyms J-0200000-02 Wage Determinations J-0200000-03 References and Technical Documents J-0200000-04 Sample Invoice Form J-0200000-05 NAVFAC Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) J-0200000-06 Service Provider Information J-0200000-07 Asset Specification J-0200000-08 Characteristic Meter Reading Information J-0200000-09 NAVFAC Maximo Data Reporting J-0200000-10 Security Requirements Applicable For The Fleet Logistics Center, Pearl Harbor Fuel Complex J-0200000-11 Reserved J-0200000-12 Exhibit Line Item Numbers, Base Period J-0200000-13 Exhibit Line Item Numbers, Option Period One J-0200000-14 Exhibit Line Item Numbers, Option Period Two J-0200000-15 Exhibit Line Item Numbers, Option Period Three J-0200000-16 Exhibit Line Item Numbers, Option Period Four J-0200000-17 Special/Secure Access Locations J-1502000-01 Site Maps J-1502000-02 Fleet Logistics Center Description of Fire Protection and Alarm Systems J-1502000-03 Reserved J-1502000-04 Fleet Logistics Center Inspection, Testing and Preventive Maintenance Schedule J-1502000-05 MCBH Fire Alarm Systems J-1502000-06 MCBH Locations of Obsolete Fire Alarm Systems J-1502000-07 MCBH Fire Alarm Daily Status Log J-1502000-08 MCBH Fire Sprinkler Systems J-1502000-09 MCBH Inspection, Testing & Maintenance Form J-1502000-10 Testing & Inspecting MATOC 3 & 4 Flight Simulator J-1502000-11 Kitchen Fire Suppression Systems & Equipment J-1502000-12 Testing & Inspecting Kitchen Fire Suppression System J-1502000-13 Historical Service Order Workload J-1502000-14 Facilities and Equipment Summary Table

J – 0200000-TOC, Page 1 (Amendment No. 0001)

NEMA WC5

1973 (R1987)(Rev. 1-13) Thermoplastic-Insulated Wire and Cable for Transmission and Distribution of Electrical Energy

NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA)

NFPA 11 Low Expansion Foam Extinguishing Systems NFPA 16 Deluge Foam-Water Sprinkler System and Foam-Water Spray System NFPA 17 Dry Chemical Extinguishing Systems NFPA 17A Wet Chemical Extinguishing Systems NFPA 20 Centrifugal Fire Pumps NFPA 25 Inspection, Testing and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems NFPA 70 National Electrical Code NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm Code NFPA 96 Ventilation Control & Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations NFPA 101 Life Safety Code NFPA 241 Safeguarding Construction, Alteration and Demolition Operations NFPA 2001 Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing System

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

NAVFACINST 11013.40A NAVFAC Partnering System NAVFAC MO-200 Facilities Engineering Electrical Exterior Facilities NAVFAC FM&S Metrics Facility Management and Sustainment (FM&S) Terms of Art Metrics

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVY OPERATIONS

OPNAVINST 11320.23G Navy Fire and Emergency Services Program

PUBLIC LAW

P.L. 91-596 Occupational Safety and Health Act

UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES (UL)

UL FPED 2005 Fire Protection Equipment Directory

UL 300

Fire Testing of Fire Extinguishing Systems for Protection of Commercial Cooking Equipment

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA

UFC 3-600-01 Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities UFC 3-601-02 Operations and Maintenance: Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Fire

Protection Systems

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)

EM 385-1-1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements

MISCELLANEOUS

Drawings/Manuals C-17 Flight Simulator Facility Drawings and Design Specifications Drawings/Manuals Red Hill Fire Protection and Ventilation Systems (FLC P-1551) Fleet Industrial Support Center (FISC) O&M Manuals, Vols. I - VIII

Operation and Maintenance Manuals for Fire Protection Systems, Oct 2004

R.S. Means Means Repair and Remodeling Cost Data

J-0200000-03 Page 2 of 2 (Amendment No. 0001)

RFP No. N62478-18-R-2466 ATTACHMENT L-1

CORPORATE EXPERIENCE LIST

14-18-2466 Attachment L-1 - Corporate Experience List

1 (Amendment No. 0001)

Prime Contractor's or Subcontractor's name:

Percentage of work this subcontractor will perform:

Provide the following information for each contract/subcontract your firm performed. Also provide the following information for each subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement.

1 2 3 4 Contract No.

Title of Contract:

Name of Contracting Activity Contract Type (e.g., FFP, IDQ, Cost reimbursement) Contract Price below (Include contract value only for the portion of work YOUR company performed that is similar to the work required under this solicitation.)

Estimated or Actual Completion Date Base Year Term (From _____ To _____) Firm-Fixed Price Amount Indefinite Quantity Amount Maximum Total Amount Actually Ordered Option 1 Term (From _____ To _____) Firm-Fixed Price Amount Indefinite Quantity Amount Maximum Total Amount Actually Ordered Option 2 Term (From _____ To _____) Firm-Fixed Price Amount Indefinite Quantity Amount Maximum Total Amount Actually Ordered

RFP No. N62478-18-R-2466 ATTACHMENT L-1

CORPORATE EXPERIENCE LIST

14-18-2466 Attachment L-1 - Corporate Experience List

2 (Amendment No. 0001)

Prime Contractor's or Subcontractor's name:

Option 3 Term (From _____ To _____) Firm-Fixed Price Amount Indefinite Quantity Amount Maximum Total Amount Actually Ordered Option 4 Term (From _____ To _____) Firm-Fixed Price Amount Indefinite Quantity Amount Maximum Total Amount Actually Ordered Total contract amount. (Note: This amount should equal the total for base plus all option years above.)

Description of work performed

Contracting Officer's Name Contracting Officer's Phone No.

Contracting Officer's e-mail address Administrative Contracting Officer's Name Administrative Contracting Officer's Phone No.

Administrative Contracting Officer's e-mail address

RFP No. N62478-18-R-2466 ATTACHMENT L-2

KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE LIST

14-18-2466 Attachment L-2, Key Personnel Experience List

1 (Amendment No. 0001)

Work Experience:

Company Name Position Held Contract No. Title of Contract Description of Work Annual Contract

Value

(Complete this column only if position held did not apply to entire contract.)

Identify the type of services and percentage of contract value individual was responsible for

Timeframe in this position (i.e., 10/1/03 - 9/30/04)

Total amount of time employed in this position

Example:

ABC Co. Project Manager N62742-15-D-9999

Maintenance and Repair of Fire Protection and Alarm Systems, Ft. Shafter, Oahu, HI

Performed maintenance and repair on fixed fire alarm systems and equipment, automatic sprinkler systems, foam extinguishing systems, and FM-200 fire extinguishing systems. $ 1,000,000.00

Repairs of Fire Protection Systems, 25% of annual contract value or $250,000.00 3/1/15 - 12/31/15 9 months

Key Personnel's Name:

Proposed position if awarded this contract:

Provide the following information for each key personnel (i.e., Project Manager and Quality Manager) your firm proposes for this contract.

Attachment L-3, Page 1 (Amendment No. 0001)

ATTACHMENT L-3

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT

RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

Attachment L-3, Page 2 (Amendment No. 0001)

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Attachment L-3, Page 3 (Amendment No. 0001)

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

Attachment L-3, Page 4 (Amendment No. 0001)

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):