Amendment 0003.pdf

POLS22

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to revise Factors 2 and 4.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Jul-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247322R1201

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

21-Apr-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Jul-2022

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING NAVY

CODE: DCNAV

750 PACIFIC HIGHWAY

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-0001

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247322R1201

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

AMENDMENT 0003 DATED 28 JULY 2022

Contract: N62473-22-R-1201 RFP Issue Date: 21 April 2022 Subject: INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY MULTIPLE AWARD

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION,

AND REPAIR OF NATURAL GAS AND PETROLEUM, OILS, AND

LUBRICANTS (POL) FUEL SYSTEMS PROJECTS AT VARIOUS

GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA,

NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO

1. The purpose of this Amendment is to revise Evaluation Factors 2 and 4 of the RFP. If these changes require a revision/addition to your proposal, submit a revised proposal no later than the due date specified on the SF1442. If there are no revisions received, your current proposal will be used for evaluation purposes.

a) Revise the BASIS OF AWARD AND EVALUATION FACTORS as follows:

Delete the following from FACTOR 2: EXPERIENCE, paragraph a. Proposal Submission Requirements:

FACTOR 2: EXPERIENCE (See definition)

a. Proposal Submission Requirements:

Submit Exhibit “B” (Construction/Design Experience Project Data Sheet) under Tab “2.”

(1) Construction Experience:

The Offeror shall submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects that best demonstrate self-performed (see definition) experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to projects that may be ordered under this contract.

For purposes of this evaluation, relevant projects are further defined as new construction, renovation, and/or repair of natural gas and POL fuels systems projects with a construction cost of $500,000 or more.

Examples of relevant construction projects are predominantly design-build or secondarily design-bid-build for new construction, renovation, or repair of natural gas and POL fuels systems. Projects may include, but are not limited to: Repairs, renovation, or construction of fuel storage and distribution systems, cathodic protection systems, spill containment systems, and all ancillary natural gas and POL support facilities and structures to include emergency backup power systems, fire protection systems, and control systems for such facilities and structures.

Additional minimum submission requirements:

- Submit at least one (1) self-performed relevant construction project with a construction cost of $3,000,000 or more. This refers to the total contract cost if the work was performed by the Offeror as prime contractor, and the subcontract cost if the work was performed by the Offeror as a subcontractor.

- Submit at least one (1) self-performed relevant construction project that was performed by the Offeror as a prime contractor.

- Submit at least one (1) self-performed relevant construction project demonstrating the Offeror’s experience with design-build (see definition) construction of a natural gas and/or POL fuels systems project.

- Within the submitted projects, the Offeror shall demonstrate self-performed (see definition) construction experience for each of the following items:

• At least one relevant project must demonstrate self-performed construction experience with natural gas pipeline construction.

• At least one relevant project must demonstrate self-performed construction experience with POL fuels pipeline construction.

• At least one relevant project must demonstrate self-performed construction of marine diesel or aviation fuel pipelines.

Note: A single project may satisfy more than one of the above minimum requirements.

Exhibit “B” must clearly address how the project meets the above requirements.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be 100% complete (see definition) within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

Projects which are not 100% complete as of the date of issuance of this RFP shall not be considered.

A project is defined as a construction project with a single starting point and a single ending point, performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit “B”) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded;

however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (how the project meets the requirements listed above). In addition, the description shall also address any sustainable features (see definition) for the project, including specific descriptions of those features.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, relevant projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture member. In accordance with 13 C.F.R. 125.8(e), if the joint venture is an SBA approved Mentor- Protégé joint venture, the partners of the joint venture in aggregate must demonstrate the relevant project experience necessary to perform the contract. With the exception of an SBA approved Mentor-Protégé joint venture, Joint Venture Offerors who fail to submit relevant experience for all Joint Venture members will be assigned a deficiency and will be rated Unacceptable. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name and address is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract.

Regarding any such submitted project, if the Offeror fails to demonstrate the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm’s meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, the project will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated.

The Offeror may NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor unless the following applies:

Applicable to Small Business Offerors only:

If a Small Business Offeror cannot independently demonstrate its own experience, the Small Business Offeror may utilize the experience of a first-tier Small Business subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement in order to demonstrate relevant construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Government will consider the submitted relevant experience of each first-tier Small Business subcontractor as the experience of the Small Business Offeror, provided that:

1) The Small Business Offeror submits a supporting partnership or teaming agreement for each first-tier Small Business subcontractor; and

2) The Small Business Offeror provides an explanation of the meaningful involvement that each first-tier Small Business subcontractor will have in performance of this contract.

Regarding any such submitted project(s), if the Small Business Offeror fails to include a supporting partnership or teaming agreement and/or fails to demonstrate the first-tier Small Business subcontractor’s meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, the project(s) will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated. Small Business Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

B) Delete FACTOR 4: SAFETY, paragraph a. Proposal Submission Requirements and replace with the following:

FACTOR 4: SAFETY

a. Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit Exhibit “E” (Safety Data Sheet/ Safety Narrative) under Tab “4”. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded.

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below.

For a partnership, or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each business entity who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one (1) safety narrative is required. Offerors who fail to submit DART rates and TCR for each business entity who is part of the partnership/joint venture will be assigned a deficiency and will be rated Unacceptable.

For a Small Business Offeror who is utilizing the construction experience of a first-tier Small Business subcontractor under Factor 2 (Experience), the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for the Small Business Offeror and for each first-tier Small Business subcontractor; however, only one (1) safety narrative is required. Small Business Offerors who fail to submit DART rates and TCR for the Small Business Offeror and each first-tier Small Business subcontractor (if applicable) will be assigned a deficiency and will be rated Unacceptable.

Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART rates and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors, except as noted above for Small Business Offerors utilizing first-tier Small Business subcontractor experience.

(1) DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’[2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. An acceptable/detailed explanation is required for any calendar year (CY) for which an Offeror has a moderate or higher risk that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

(a) DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

(b) Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

(2) TCR: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’[2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. An acceptable/detailed explanation is required for any calendar year (CY) for which an Offeror has a moderate or higher risk that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

(a) TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

(b) Calculation of TCR: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

(a) Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

(b) Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

(c) Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance and accountability for the adherence to the safety requirements of the contract, for the subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

(d) The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

(4) The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

b. Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any positive or negative rates and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(1) DART Rate: The board will evaluate rates over the last five (5) years considering changes that take it from one (1) risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative rates occurring at or above moderate risk levels require the Offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

(a) Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

(b) Low Risk and/or Very Low Risk for four (4) or more years within the specified five (5) Calendar Years would indicate a strength.

(c) Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk or higher to Low Risk or Very Low Risk would indicate a strength.

(d) An increasing DART rate trend, could be considered a weakness (i.e. Moderate Risk or better to High Risk or Extremely High Risk) unless an acceptable explanation is provided for any trends that rise at or above Moderate.

(e) High Risk and/or Extremely High Risk for four (4) or more years within the specified five

(5) Calendar Years (CY) could be considered a significant weakness.

(f) This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate

Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0

Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

(2) TCR: The board will evaluate rates over the last five (5) years considering changes that take it from one (1) risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative rates occurring above moderate risk levels require the Offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

(a) Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

(b) Low Risk and/or Very Low Risk for four (4) or more years within the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY) would indicate a strength.

(c) Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

(d) An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk (EHR)) unless an acceptable explanation is provided for any trends that rise at or above Moderate.

(e) High Risk and/or Extremely High Risk for four (4) or more years within the specified five

(5) Calendar Years (CY) could be considered a significant weakness.

(f) This chart correlates the TCR to the level of risk:

Risk TCR

Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 6.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

(3) The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the Offeror:

(a) Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

(b) Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in its selection process.

(c) Describes a logical management plan of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance and accountability for the adherence to the safety requirements of the contract, for subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

(d) The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

(4) The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

NOTE: ALL OTHER PARAGRAPHS, PROVISIONS, AND CONDITIONS TO RFP N62473-22-R-1201

REMAIN UNCHANGED. THE OFFEROR MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF ALL

AMENDMENTS ON THE SF 1442.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 24-May-2022 02:00 PM to 28-Aug-2022 02:00 PM.

(End of Summary of Changes)