PLA QUESTIONNAIRE PUMPHOUSE CL 052124.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Project Labor Agreement for Replacement of Intermediate Pumphouse and Reservoirs at Naval Air Weapons Station (NAWS) China Lake, Ridgecrest, California
Solicitation number
N62473-21-D-1402-PTOX021
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document is a Request for Information (RFI) Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity to replace an intermediate pumphouse and two reservoirs at the Naval Air Weapons Station in China Lake, California. The contract is anticipated to be a $50M-$100M Design-Build project with a 910-calendar day period of performance. The government is seeking industry feedback on the potential use of a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) for this construction project. The questionnaire asks respondents to provide details on their entity type, availability of specialized contractors, union/non-union labor, interest in the project, experience with PLAs, wage rate comparisons, potential cost impacts of PLAs, and timing considerations for PLA negotiations. The government will use the responses to determine if a PLA is appropriate to advance economy, efficiency, and labor-management stability for this federal procurement.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Current Project Details (Template) Questionnaire for Request for Information for N62473-21-D-1402 PTO X021 – REPLACE IMMEDIATE PUMPHOUSE AND RESEVOIRS AT NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION, CHINA LAKE, CALIFORNIA

Questions
Responses

1) Are you responding as a representative of a government entity, union, contractor (union or non-union) and/or qualified small business?

2) Would the work involve specialized construction that is available from only a limited number of contractors or subcontractors? Explain in detail.

3) What is your understanding of the availability of union labor and non-union labor in this area for this type of project? Are you otherwise aware of national, regional, or local interest in participating in this project by union or non-union contractors? Explain in detail.

4) As a qualified contractor for a project of this type, would you be interested in participating in this project?

Would the requirement of a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) under this project impact your interest in any way? Explain in detail.

5) Are you aware of PLAs having been used on other similar construction projects in the area and/or nearby areas? Explain in detail.

6) How do union wage rates compare to prevailing wage rates for this type of project and in this area, i.e. prevailing wages rates under the Construction Wage Rates Requirements statute (formerly known as the Davis-Bacon Act)? Explain in detail.

7) Are there any ways in which the requirement of a PLA might increase costs on a project of this type in this area? Explain in detail.

8) What are the price impacts of allowing post-award PLAs versus PLAs with proposals?

9) How will you price for the PLA costs in your offer prior to finalization during post-award?

10) What type of relief will post-award PLAs provide, if any?

11) How much time is needed post-award to negotiate and submit a finalized PLA? What is the impact to the period of performance or contract completion date if post-award PLAs are allowed? Take into consideration whether the project is DB or DBB and whether PLAs can be finalized concurrently with design and/or after award but prior to mobilization.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .