N62473-18-R-5816_Amendment_0001.pdf

ACQR8AMACC

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 8(a) SET-ASIDE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN

CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO

The purpose of this amendment is to revise the Phase One RFP. See page tw o for revisions.

The date and time for receipt of proposals is revised FROM 28 November 2017 2:00 p.m. local time TO 6 December 2017 2:00 p.m. local time.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Nov-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247318R5816

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-Oct-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Nov-2017

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTS CORE

CODE RAQ20

1220 PACIFIC HWY

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-5190

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247318R5816

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 28-Nov-2017 02:00 PM to 06-Dec-2017 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION 00100

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

1. Inquiries

Inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted electronically using the Request for Information (RFI) form provided as an attachment. The Point of Contact (POC) for inquiries is Lisa Crawford at 619-532- 1261, or e-mail at lisa.crawford@navy.mil. The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt date.

2. Proposal Submittal Requirements

Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be formatted as follows and furnished in the number of copies stated herein. A cover letter shall accompany the proposal.

The cover letter shall include—

(a) The solicitation number;

(b) The name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers, and email address of the Offeror and Lead Design

Firm(s);

(c) The DUNS Number, CAGE Code, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) of the Offeror;

(d) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

(e) Names, titles, phone and facsimile numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation and;

(f) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

In addition to the cover letter, the Offeror shall submit an Offeror’s Team Consent Form for each major subcontractor/teaming partner (e.g., team member, subcontractor (i.e., Lead Design Firm(s)), parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.) identified in the Offeror’s proposal.

Proposals shall be submitted in three ring binders or bound, with tabs or separators. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to. Proposals shall be submitted on 8.5” X 11” paper, utilizing both sides of the paper.

The format for the proposal is as follows:

Phase One:

Cover Letter lisa.crawford Highlight

Offeror’s Team Consent Form(s) First two pages of SF1442 - with blocks 14 through 20c completed Financial Questionnaire (Original in sealed envelope from financial institution in original proposal folder only) Surety Form Section 00600 – Representations and Certifications VETS-4212 Report Submission Confirmation (or Statement of Non-applicability) Tab 1 - Factor 1, Technical Approach (Exhibit “A,” Organizational Chart, and Signed Copies of Agreements or Letters of Commitment for Each Member of the Offeror’s Team) Tab 2 - Factor 2, Experience (Exhibits “B”)

- Factor 3, Past Performance (Exhibits “C” or CPARS/CCASS/ACASS evaluations) (Evaluations should immediately follow the project shown on Exhibit “B” to which they pertain)

Tab 3 - Address any adverse past performance issues, if applicable Tab 4 - Factor 4, Safety (Exhibit “D”)

THE FOLLOWING EVALUATION FACTORS ARE APPLICABLE ONLY TO THOSE OFFERORS

WHO ARE SELECTED TO PROCEED TO PHASE TWO OF THE SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS. DO

NOT SUBMIT TABS 5 THROUGH 7 IN PHASE ONE PROPOSALS.

Phase Two:

Tab 5 - Factor 5, Technical Solution (Narrative and Drawings) Tab 6 - Factor 6, Energy and Sustainable Design (Narrative) Tab 7 - Factor 7, Price (In sealed envelope in original proposal folder only) – The envelope shall contain the following original documents: SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with blocks 14 through 20c completed; Bid Bond (in the amount of 20% of the proposal price for PTO #0001 or $3,000,000, whichever is less)

Representations and Certifications, Financial Questionnaires, and Surety Forms will not be rated. However, they will be considered in assessing the Offeror’s responsibility.

Note: Offerors must complete and submit Section 00600 of the RFP as part of their proposal even if the Offeror is registered in SAM. Section 00600 of the RFP contains clauses which are not found in the electronic Reps & Certs in SAM; therefore, we require them to be completed and submitted as part of your proposal.

Offerors are asked to submit only the information/exhibits required. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures, CDs, or other pre-printed materials.

A total of one (1) original and two (2) hard copies of the complete Phase One proposal in response to this RFP must be received by this office no later than the date and time stated in Block 13 of the SF1442. Offerors should address all Phase One evaluation factors and shall submit the proposal to the following address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest Capital Improvements Contracts Core /RAQ20.LC Attention: Lisa Crawford 1220 Pacific Highway, Building 127 San Diego, CA 92132-5190

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

It is an Offeror's responsibility to deliver its proposal to the proper place at the proper time, which includes allowing a reasonable amount of time for the delivery of the proposal. (See FAR 15.208(a)). Proposals that are received after the stated date and time in Block 13 of the SF1442 will not be considered.

Offerors shall ensure that proposals are mailed or sent by courier in a timely manner to be delivered to the NAVFAC Southwest facility no later than the date and time stated in Block 13 of the SF1442.

Offerors intending to deliver the proposals in person to the facility at the address above are cautioned that this NAVFAC Southwest facility is located in downtown San Diego. An Offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of a proposal where it delays delivering its proposal until the last few minutes before the time set for receipt of proposals. It is recommended that the Offeror allows for delays in driving through downtown San Diego caused by traffic (both freeway and downtown), construction projects, train/trolley crossing, parking at the pay lots/meters near the facility, and gaining access to a secure Government facility. No parking or offloading of proposals is available at the Government facility. Proposals are to be delivered to personnel in the mailroom in Building 128, and reasonable time shall be allowed for the person in the mailroom to receive and time stamp the proposal. The stamp time is determined from the NAVFAC Southwest facility mailroom time stamp and not any other time keeping equipment that the Offeror may own. Immediately upon proposal delivery, the Offeror shall leave the Government facility. An Offeror that does not leave the premises may be requested to leave or escorted by security personnel.

3. Pre-Proposal Conference

(a) A pre-proposal conference and site visit will not be conducted at this time.

(b) A list of Frequently-Asked-Questions (FAQ) with appropriate responses is provided as an attachment to the

RFP. All firms are encouraged to review the FAQ. The FAQ should be viewed prior to submitting any questions regarding the RFP.

(c) Failure of a prospective Offeror to submit any questions will be construed to mean that the Offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation.

(d) All prospective Offerors are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing. Amendments will be posted on the website at https://www.neco.navy.mil. However, if an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of any such amendment as described in Contract Clause “Amendment to Solicitations” of this section shall be applicable.

4. Financial Questionnaire

Offerors shall submit the Financial Questionnaire to their financial institution and request the financial institution complete the questionnaire with regard to the Offeror’s firm. Upon completion of the questionnaire, the financial institution should place the completed questionnaire in a sealed envelope showing the return address of the financial institution and forward it to the Offeror so that the Offeror can include the questionnaire (in the sealed envelope) with the Offeror’s proposal.

If the Offeror is a joint venture, information should be submitted for the joint venture. If there is no information for the joint venture, information should be submitted for each joint venture partner.

5. Surety Form

Offerors shall submit the Surety Form to report their surety bonding information, verifying aggregate bonding capacity, current available bonding, as well as single project limit. Ensure the name of the Offeror’s surety, including the name and phone number of the Offeror’s agent within the surety, is shown on the form.

If the Offeror is a joint venture, one Surety Form shall be submitted for the joint venture, not the individual partners.

6. System for Award Management

The System for Award Management (SAM) is combining federal procurement systems and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance into one new system. This consolidation includes the functionality from the following systems:

* Central Contractor Registry (CCR)

* Federal Agency Registration (Fedreg)

* Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA)

* Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)

Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to award of a DoD contract. In order to participate on this solicitation, contractors must also complete electronic representations and certifications.

For more information and to complete the electronic Reps & Certs, see the SAM website at http://www.sam.gov. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor not registered in SAM. Remember to review the NAICS codes listed in your SAM record and make sure that you have listed the NAICS code for this procurement.

7. Federal Contractor Reporting

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.13, any contractor or subcontractor with a contract or subcontract with the Federal Government of $150,000 or more that was entered into on or after October 1, 2015 (or $100,000 or more that was entered prior to October 1, 2015) must take affirmative action to hire and promote qualified covered veterans which includes, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam-era, recently separated veterans, and any other veterans who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized.

If subject to the reporting requirements, companies must file an annual VETS-4212 Report, which shows the number of covered veterans in their workforce and number of new hires, including covered veterans hired during the reporting period. Instructions, information, and follow-up assistance is provided at VETS-4212 Internet site at http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm or employers may contact the VETS-4212 customer support at (866) 237- 0275 or e-mail at VETS4212-customersupport@dol.gov.

VETS-4212 Reports must be filed between August 1 and September 30 of each year following a calendar year in which a contractor or subcontractor held a covered contract or subcontract.

Upon the successful submission of a VETS-4212 report, federal contractors will receive an email confirmation of receipt notification for their records. Offerors shall include a copy of their confirmation notification email in their proposal as verification of submission for the current reporting period. DO NOT SUBMIT A COPY OF THE REPORT ITSELF. If this requirement is not applicable to your firm, provide a statement that your firm does not have any contracts subject to this requirement.

A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor that has not submitted a required annual form VETS-4212, Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (VETS-4212 Report) if subject to the reporting requirements of 38 U.S.C. 4212(d) for that fiscal year.

8. Incurred Expenses

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

9. No Alternate or Multiple Proposals

Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposals will be considered in the evaluation.

10. Mentor Protégé Agreements

Only Mentor Protégé Agreements formally approved by the SBA will be considered for this procurement. Mentor Protégé Agreements approved by other agencies will not be considered. The proposal shall contain both the Joint

Venture Agreement and the SBA letter of approval for the Mentor Protégé Agreement, showing the approval is valid as of the date of the proposal submission.

SECTION 00210

BASIS OF AWARD AND EVALUATION FACTORS

1. BASIS OF AWARD

Selection of contractor(s) will be accomplished using Source Selection Procedures on the basis of Best Value to the Government, considering price and other factors combined. Interested firms are expected to review the RFP and participate in a pre-proposal conference and site visit (if conducted), provide proposed prices for the initial project, and provide proposal information requested to evaluate their technical and past performance factors.

The Two Phase Design-Build procedures of FAR 36.3 will be used for this procurement. Phase One of the solicitation is in accordance with FAR Part 36.3. Phase One evaluation will result in a determination of the most highly qualified Offerors. These Offerors will be requested to submit a Phase Two proposal. The maximum number of Offerors that will be selected to submit a Phase Two proposal is five (5), unless the contracting officer determines that a number greater than five (5) is in the Government’s interest and is consistent with the purposes and objectives of two-phase design-build contracting. Phase Two of the solicitation shall require submission of technical and price proposals by the Offerors selected in Phase One, which will be evaluated separately in accordance with Part 15. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contract(s) without discussions.

The Government anticipates three or more multiple award construction contracts. Offerors are advised that those Offerors who are selected to proceed to Phase Two are not guaranteed receipt of a contract award. Award of the basic multiple award construction contracts will be made to those responsible Offerors whose proposals conforming to the solicitation are determined to be the most advantageous to the Government considering past performance, technical, and price factors. The Government reserves the right to award three or more contracts under this solicitation or to award only the initial project (Proposed Task Order 0001) identified in the RFP as a single-action contract. The Government reserves the right not to award the Proposed Task Order 0001. The Government reserves the right to substitute or add other design-build projects that meet the scope of the MACC.

The Government reserves the right to reject any or all basic contract offers at any time prior to award; to negotiate with any one or all Offerors; to award the contract to other than the Offeror submitting the lowest total price; and to award contracts to three or more Offerors submitting proposals determined by the Source Selection Authority to be the most advantageous to the Government.

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT IT IS DEFINITELY POSSIBLE THAT AN AWARD MAY BE MADE

WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS OR ANY CONTACT CONCERNING THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED.

Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable price and technical terms. Offerors should not assume that they would be contacted or afforded the opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposal.

Firms participating in the pre-proposal conference and site visit (if conducted) will not be compensated for their participation.

Successful Offerors will receive the following contract awards:

Best Value receives award with a minimum guarantee and the initial project, if the Government chooses to award it.

Second, third, and any additional selected contractor will each receive award with a minimum guarantee, and selection will be based on the same criteria as the first selection.

2. DEFINITIONS

2. Definitions: The following definitions are provided to assist evaluators in the evaluation of each non-price factor.

DEFICIENCY: A material failure of a proposal to meet a solicitation requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

WEAKNESS: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

SIGNIFICANT WEAKNESS: A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

STRENGTH: An aspect of a proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

ACCEPTABLE FEATURES: A proposed method or technique in the proposal that addresses solicitation requirements such that no further explanation or documentation is necessary.

PAST PERFORMANCE: Relates to how well an Offeror and Offeror’s Team has performed; e.g., the quality of work accomplished, schedule compliance, customer satisfaction.

EXPERIENCE: Pertains to work performed by an Offeror and Offeror’s Team, within the prescribed timeframe, which is the same or similar to the work that may be ordered under this contract in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Experience is distinct from past performance (how well an Offeror has performed).

SUSTAINABLE FEATURES: Features in the design, construction, and operation of facilities with the goal of conserving resources and minimizing adverse effects on the environment while enhancing occupant productivity, minimizing energy use, improving quality and durability of materials, increasing recycling and use of recycled products, waste reduction, etc. Relevant sustainable features are those that are the same or similar to those recognized by Third Party Certification entities.

PROJECT: A design-build or design-bid-build construction activity or task, with a single starting point and a single ending point.

COMBINED PROJECT(S): Projects with multiple starting and ending points, performed under separate task orders, delivery orders, or multiple contracts combined in a single description. No credit will be given for work performed under MACC/IDIQ contracts in the aggregate or for multiple projects completed under more than one task/delivery order.

RENOVATION, REPAIR, ALTERATION PROJECT TYPES: Refers to projects where the work modifies existing facilities.

NEW CONSTRUCTION: Refers to creating entirely new facilities (or new expansions/additions to existing facilities where a new structure and foundation are provided as part of the expansion/addition).

100% COMPLETE:

For construction projects: The facility is completely constructed and ready for the intended use.

For design projects: 100% plans and specifications signed off by an Architect-Engineer and ready for construction with final cost estimate. Does not include any Post Construction Award Support (PCAS).

OFFEROR: Refers to the Contractor submitting the proposal as Offeror, including joint ventures, whose name and address appears in Block 14 of Standard Form (SF) 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award). In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between the Offeror’s name and address cited on the SF 1442 and any other part of the proposal, the SF 1442 is the conclusive document in determining the Offeror who is submitting the proposal.

OFFEROR’S TEAM: Refers to the Offeror (see definition), the Offeror's outside Lead Design Firm, and/or in-house Lead Designer(s) only; does not include subcontractors or consultants.

LEAD DESIGN FIRM / DESIGN TEAM: Applies to the Offeror’s primary design firm(s) and any in-house lead designer(s).

JOINT VENTURE (JV): A legal business entity formed between two or more companies (parties) to undertake the performance activities of a contract together. This does not include other arrangements such as “teaming agreement” or “strategic alliance,” which are not recognized as bona fide joint ventures for the purposes of this solicitation.

FIVE-YEAR PERIOD: The prescribed timeframe for this solicitation that refers to the period of time for which projects may be submitted for experience or past performance. The five-year period is calculated by counting back five years from the initial RFP issuance date.

DESIGN-BUILD: Refers to combining design and construction in a single contract with one contractor. Design-build projects require design of the project by a licensed professional (i.e. engineer, architect). Projects that only require shop drawing level effort are not design-build projects.

DESIGN-BID-BUILD: Refers to the traditional delivery method where design and construction are sequential and contracted for separately, with two separate contracts and contractors; one for an A-E contract and one for a construction contract.

SELF-PERFORM: Refers to performing relevant and major construction trade work in-house without subcontractors. This does not include project administration or management functions (such as quality control or safety program) and miscellaneous work (such as housekeeping or cleanup). Relevant and major construction trade work is that which is the same or similar to the work that may be ordered under this contract.

PAGE: Refers to one printed side of a piece of paper. (For example, 5 pieces of paper printed on both sides would result in 10 pages of narrative.)

F. EVALUATION FACTORS

3. PHASE ONE

Basis of Evaluation/Submission Requirements/Criteria Description for Each Factor:

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH

a. Proposal Submission Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information under Tab “1”:

(1) Using Exhibit “A” (Offeror Team Composition and Management), provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firm(s) and primary design firm(s) for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). On a separate sheet, include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative (Exhibit A) shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages), excluding the organizational chart. The information requested in item (2) below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor-protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, design subcontractor, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.). If the Offeror is proposing as a Mentor-Protégé joint venture, the Offeror shall submit the SBA approved mentor protégé joint venture agreement with the SBA approval letter of the mentor protégé agreement (see definition) and any subsequent extensions.

b. Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

FACTOR 2: EXPERIENCE (See definition)

a. Proposal Submission Requirements:

Submit Exhibit “B” (Construction/Design Experience Project Data Sheet) under Tab “2.”

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrate your experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to projects that may be ordered under this contract.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

- Similar in size: Construction cost of $100,000 or more. Note: If your firm performed the work as a subcontractor, your subcontract shall have a minimum construction cost of $100,000.

- Similar in scope: Includes, but is not limited to, new construction, renovation, and/or repair, by design-build or design-bid-build, of commercial and institutional buildings.

In addition, the Offeror shall meet the following minimum requirements:

- At least one (1) relevant project shall demonstrate the Offeror’s experience performing primarily new construction (see definition).

- At least one (1) relevant project shall demonstrate the Offeror’s experience performing primarily renovation construction (see definition).

- At least one (1) relevant project shall demonstrate the Offeror’s experience constructing projects with a construction cost of $2,000,000 or greater.

- At least two (2) relevant projects shall demonstrate the Offeror’s experience with design-build construction (see definition).

Note: A single project may satisfy more than one of the above minimum requirements.

Exhibit “B” must clearly address how the project meets the above requirements.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be 100% complete (see definition) within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit “B”) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the lisa.crawford Highlight lisa.crawford Highlight

Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (how the project meets the requirements listed above). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name and address is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract.

Regarding any such submitted project, if the Offeror fails to demonstrate the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm’s meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, the project will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated.

The Offeror may not utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor.

(2) Design Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrate design experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to projects that may be ordered under this contract. The relevant scope of work shall have been performed by the proposed design firm(s). Failure to submit relevant projects for all proposed Lead Design Firms may result in a lower rating for this factor.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

- Similar in size: Construction cost of $100,000 or more.

- Similar in scope: Includes, but is not limited to, new construction, renovation, and/or repair, by design-build or design-bid-build, of commercial and institutional buildings.

In addition, the Offeror shall meet the following minimum requirements:

- At least one (1) relevant project shall demonstrate the design team’s experience performing primarily new construction (see definition).

- At least one (1) relevant project shall demonstrate the design team’s experience performing primarily renovation design (see definition).

- At least one (1) relevant project shall demonstrate the design team’s experience designing projects with a construction cost of $2,000,000 or greater.

- At least two (2) relevant projects shall demonstrate the design team’s experience with design-build projects (see definition).

Note: A single project may satisfy more than one of the above minimum requirements.

Exhibit “B” must clearly address how the project meets the above requirements.

Projects submitted for the design team shall be 100% complete (see definition) within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The design completion date shall reflect the date that plans and specifications were complete, signed off by an Architect-Engineer, and approved for construction, and does not include architect/engineering services during construction.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit “B”) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (how the project meets the requirements listed above). Provide a brief description and address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name and address is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

Regarding any such submitted project, if the Offeror fails to demonstrate the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm’s meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, the project will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated.

The Offeror may utilize experience of design subcontractor(s) to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor.

b. Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s Team’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects (5) for construction and five (5) for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Offerors who submit relevant design-build projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Offerors who submit relevant construction projects that demonstrate additional experience with construction projects of $2,000,000 and above beyond the one (1) required project may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate additional construction experience.

Offerors who submit relevant construction projects that demonstrate additional design-build experience beyond the two (2) required design-build project may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate additional design-build experience.

Offerors who submit relevant projects that demonstrate experience with applicable sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with applicable sustainable features.

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

a. Proposal Submission Requirements:

Submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Exhibit “C”) and CCASS/ACASS/CPARS evaluations under Tab “2” immediately following each of the project data sheets to which they pertain. Submit any other past performance information under Tab “3.”

If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) or Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed AE Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) or CPARS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CCASS, ACASS, or CPARS evaluation, submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (Exhibit “C”) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal.

Offerors may use PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs, but Offerors must include these in the proposal and shall not incorporate these by reference. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact Lisa Crawford at lisa.crawford@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

b. Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror’s Team performed on the recent, relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s and design firms’ performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

With respect to relevancy, past performance of greater relevancy will have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive a Neutral Confidence rating.

FACTOR 4: SAFETY

Submit Exhibit “D” (Safety Data Sheet / Safety Narrative) under Tab “4.” Individual blocks on this form may be expanded.

For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each entity that is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

For the three (3) previous complete calendar years (2014, 2015, and 2016), submit your EMR (which compares your company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums over a three year period). The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. If the Offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate:

For the (3) previous complete calendar years (2014, 2015, and 2016), submit your OSHA DART and TRC rates, as defined by the U. S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If an Offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART or TRC rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively should be addressed as part of this element. Lower OSHA DART and/or TRC Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety:

Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Within this description, define your Good Catch Program and safety deficiency correction procedure. The Safety narrative shall be limited to one

(1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

b. Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to:

OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

Experience Modification Rate (EMR) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case

(TRC) Rates Offeror Technical Approach to Safety Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

The Government will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate:

The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety:

The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on projects under this procurement. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement, and the degree to which safety management system(s) are being used to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The Government will also validate that the contractor has addressed the methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, near-miss mishaps and that the contractor has utilized Good Catch Program and sound method to correct safety deficiencies in a timely manner. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

4. PHASE TWO

Basis of Evaluation/Submission Requirements/Criteria Description for Each Factor:

FACTOR 5: TECHNICAL SOLUTION – Based on Proposed Task Order 0001

a. Proposal Submission Requirements:

Submit the Technical Solution narrative and drawings under Tab “5.”

Provide a narrative, not to exceed one (1) double-sided pages (or two (2) single-sided pages), describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Address the following items in the narrative:

- Description of the Basis of Design and how it meets or exceeds the project/criteria and the requirements of the RFP. The Basis of Design shall include the following as a minimum:

Site layout including a description of the building siting and user access.

Functionality of building spaces/features, circulation, and adjacencies.

Provide conceptual design drawings, not to exceed three (3) single-sided 11”x17” sheets for evaluation of the following:

- Conceptual site plan.

- Conceptual floor plan.

- Elevation plan for the primary entrance side of the facility.

b. Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

FACTOR 6: ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE DESIGN – Based on Proposed Task Order 0001

Submit Energy and Sustainable Design information under Tab “6.”

Provide the following information, which describes how the project will meet or exceed the following sustainable design contract requirements.

(1) EPAct 2005 Energy Efficiency Narrative:

Using the guidance outlined in Part 3 of the RFP, provide a detailed narrative to describe whether the proposed solution will meet or exceed the goal of a 30% energy reduction using the ASHRAE Std 90.1-2010, Appendix G, Building Performance Rating Method, excluding receptacle and process loads. Provide the proposed percent energy reduction. Provide the assumptions the Offeror will use to obtain a high-performance building, which will comply with these energy reduction goals.