N62473-18-R-2295_AMENDMENT_0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SECTIONS A, L, AND M OF THE SOLICITATION ARE AMENDED. SEE PAGE 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 15

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Nov-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247318R2295

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Sep-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Nov-2018

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTS CORE

CODE: FOCAS

1220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-5190

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247318R2295

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The following have been modified:

SECTION A

A.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE

PART I – SCHEDULE

X A SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

X B SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICE/COST

X C DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

X D PACKAGING AND MARKETING

X E INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

X F DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

X G CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

X H SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

PART II – CONTRACT CLAUSES

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

PART III – LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER

ATTACHMENTS

J ATTACHMENTS AND EXHIBITS

PART IV – REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

X K REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER

STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

X L INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO

OFFERORS

X M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A.2 TYPE OF CONTRACT

This is a Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. Refer to FAR Clause

52.216-1, Type of Contract (APR 1984) in Section L. The performance period will be for a two-year base period and one three-year option period. One contract will be awarded. The anticipated base performance period will be from August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2021.

Anticipated option period will be:

August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2024

A.3 SET-ASIDE DETERMINATION

In accordance with FAR Subpart 19.8, it has been determined that competition for this procurement will be limited to HUBZone small business participants, with the assigned NAICS code of 236220, Commerical and Institutional Construction, with a size standard of $36.5 million.

A.4 STANDARD EXECUTION PROCEDURES

NAVFAC SW CI ACQ Core, FOCAS Team is the procuring office and is responsible for all contractual matters related to the basic contract. Individual task orders will be issued and administered by Contracting Officers at FEAD Camp Pendleton.

A.5 SUMMARY OF SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS

The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions

(except for clarifications, as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, your initial offer should contain your best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition, among the most highly rated proposals. Information regarding the source selection process, content of proposals, evaluation of proposals, and best value source selection evaluation criteria to be used is located in Sections L and M.

A.6 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT

No Pre-Proposal meeting is scheduled at this time. If the Government decides to hold a pre-proposal meeting, an amendment will be issued to the RFP with meeting details.

A.7 DUE DATE FOR TECHNICAL AND PRICE PROPOSALS

It is requested that all questions be received by 12:00 PM (PDT) on NOVEMBER 25, 2018, as time may not permit responses to questions received after this.

Proposals are due by 2:00 PM local time (PST) on DECEMBER 10, 2018. Refer to

Section A.9, for proposal delivery address. The Offeror agrees to hold its offer firm for 90 days from the date specified for receipt of proposals. See Section L, Proposal Submission

Requirements for more information.

A.8 DATABASE REGISTRATION

a. System for Award Management (SAM): In accordance with FAR Class

Deviation - 2012-O0015 and DFARS 204.1104, and FAR Clause 52.204-7 SYSTEM FOR

AWARD MANAGEMENT (OCT 2016) apply to this acquisition. See full text of clause in

Section L.

All contractors must be registered in the SAM database prior to the award of a contract, basic agreement, basic ordering agreement, or blanket purchase agreement, in order to be eligible to receive an award. SAM is the primary registrant database for the U.S. Federal

Government. SAM combines federal procurement systems and the Catalog of Federal

Domestic Assistance into one new system. SAM includes the functionality from the following systems:

* Central Contractor Registry (CCR)

* Federal Agency Registration (FedReg)

* Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA)

* Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)

SAM collects, validates, stores, and disseminates data in support of agency acquisition missions, including Federal agency contract and assistance awards. On-line registration instructions can be accessed from the SAM home page at: www.sam.gov.

b. VETS-4212: legislatively mandated under 38 U.S. Code, Sections 4211 and

42121 and codified at 41 CFR Parts 61-250 and 61-300, and FAR Subpart 22.13, Equal

Opportunity for Veterans, the Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS) has issued regulations and reporting requirements under The Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment

Assistance Act (VEVRAA) which requires Federal contractors and subcontractors to annually submit the Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report VETS-4212 (“VETS-4212

Report”). VETS has a legislative requirement to collect, and make available to OFCCP, reported data contained on the VETS-4212 and/or VETS-4212A reports for compliance enforcement. On-line registration instructions can be accessed from the VETS-100 home page at: http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm.

c. Executive Compensation: In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.14, Reporting

Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards, and the Federal Funding

Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Pub. L. No. 109-282), as amended by section

6202 of the Government Funding Transparency Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-252), all Offerors are required to report subcontract award data and the total compensation of the five most highly compensated executives of the contractor and subcontractor. Refer to FAR Clause

52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (OCT

2015) in Section I. On-line registration and instructions can be accessed from the Federal

Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) homepage at: https://www.fsrs.gov/.

A.9 TECHNICAL/CONTRACTUAL INQUIRIES

Technical/contractual inquiries shall be directed to the Contract Specialist, BRAD

CRAWFORD, at the address listed in SF 1442, block #7, or by telephone at (619) 532-3671, or by e-mail at bradley.crawford@navy.mil. Inquiries not received at least ten (10) days prior to closing date for receipt of proposals may not be considered timely and may not receive a response.

A.10 POINTS OF CONTACT

The NAVFAC Capital Improvements (CI) Acquisition Core FOCAS Team is the procuring office for this basic contract and is responsible for all contractual matters related to the basic contract. Mailing address (US Postal Service, FedEx, or UPS delivery):

NAVFAC SW CI ACQ Core Primary POC: Brad Crawford

Code FOCAS Phone: 619-532-3671

1220 Pacific Highway, Bldg 127

San Diego, CA 92132-5190 Email: bradley.crawford@navy.mil http://www.sam.gov/ http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm mailto:bradley.crawford@navy.mil

PROPOSALS MUST BE DELIVERED VIA FEDEX, UPS, ETC.

GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL WILL NOT SIGN FOR HAND DELIVERED PROPOSALS.

A.11 CONTINUING RESOLUTION

Offerors are advised that funding may not become available. If funds are not available, no award will be made as a result of this solicitation. Offerors will not be reimbursed for any effort or proposal costs resulting from this solicitation.

A.12 POST-AWARD LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING CERTIFICATION

In accordance with the provisions of FAR 52.219-14 LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING

(JAN 2017), 13 CFR 124.510, and 13 CFR 125.6, all 8(a) Contractors must agree that:

(1) In the case of a contract for services (except construction), the concern will perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract incurred for personnel with its own employees;

(2) In the case of a contract for supplies or products (other than procurement from a non-manufacturer in such supplies or products), the concern will perform at least

50 percent of the cost of manufacturing the supplies or products (not including the costs of materials);

(3) In the case of a contract for general construction, the concern will perform at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract with its own employees (not including the costs of materials);

(4) In the case of a contract for construction by specialty trade contractors, the concern will perform at least 25 percent of the cost of the contract with its own employees (not including the costs of materials).

In the performance of this contract, the Contractor must certify at the end of each six month period with a written determination that the Contractor will ultimately comply with the requirements listed above. The Contractor shall utilize Exhibit J Post Award Limitations on Subcontracting Report form unless otherwise instructed by the Contracting Officer.

End of Section A

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. Inquiries

Inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted electronically using the Request for

Information (RFI) form provided as an attachment. The Point of Contact (POC) for inquiries is Brad

Crawford at 619-532-3671 or e-mail at Bradley.crawford@navy.mil. The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt date.

2. Proposal Submittal Requirements

Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be formatted as follows and furnished in the number of copies stated herein. A cover letter shall accompany the proposal.

The cover letter shall include—

(a) The solicitation number;

(b) The name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers, and email address of the Offeror;

(c) The DUNS Number, CAGE Code, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) of the Offeror;

(d) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

(e) Names, titles, phone and facsimile numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the

Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation and;

(f) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

Proposals shall be submitted in three ring binders or bound, with tabs or separators. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to. Proposals shall be submitted on 8.5” X 11” paper, utilizing both sides of the paper.

The format for the proposal is as follows:

Cover Letter

First two pages of SF1442 - with blocks 14 through 20c completed

Exhibit E, Financial Questionnaire (Original in sealed envelope from financial institution in original proposal folder only)

Exhibit F, Surety Form

Completed VETS-4212 and/or VETS-4212A Report Submission Confirmation (or Statement of Non-applicability)

Tab 5 – “Price”:

Price (In sealed envelope in original proposal folder only). The envelope shall contain the following original documents:

SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) with Blocks 14 through 20c completed;

Completed Section B Pre-priced and Non-pre-priced coefficients;

Bid Guarantee (in the contract minimum guarantee of $5,000);

Copies of pages or screen shots from most recent 2018 R. S. Means Facilities Construction Cost Data software used to provide pricing;

Completed Exhibit K Coefficient Breakdown Form with Profit Language; and

Completed Exhibit M PTO 0001 Worksheet.

NOTE: If Section B shows multiple sites with different Pre-priced and Non-pre-priced coefficients, a separate

Exhibit K must be submitted for proposed coefficients for each site UNLESS the Offeror is proposing one (1) Pre-priced Coefficient and one (1) Non-pre-priced Coefficient to cover all sites.

Tabs 1 - 3 “Exhibits A - C”:

- Factor 1, Ability to Manage Multiple Simultaneous Projects (Exhibit A) mailto:Bradley.crawford@navy.mil

- Factor 2, Experience (Exhibit B)

- Factor 3, Past Performance (Exhibit C or completed CCASS/CPARS Evaluations)

(Evaluations should immediately follow the project shown on Exhibit B to which they pertain)

Tab 4 - “Exhibit D”:

- Factor 4, Safety (Exhibit D)

Representations and Certifications, Financial Questionnaires, and Surety Forms will not be rated. However, they will be considered in assessing the Offeror’s responsibility.

Offerors are asked to submit only the information/exhibits required. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures, CDs, or other pre-printed materials.

A total of one (1) original and ONE (1) hard copy of the complete proposal in response to this RFP must be received by this office no later than the date and time stated in Block 13 of the SF1442. Offerors should address all evaluation factors and shall submit the proposal to the following address:

NAVFAC SW CI ACQ Core

FOCAS Team

Attention: Brad Crawford

1220 Pacific Highway, Building 127

San Diego, CA 92132

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL WILL NOT SIGN FOR HAND DELIVERED PROPOSALS.

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

It is an Offeror's responsibility to deliver its proposal to the proper place at the proper time, which includes allowing a reasonable amount of time for the delivery of the proposal. (See FAR 15.208(a)).

Proposals that are received after the stated date and time in Block 13 of the SF1442 will not be considered.

Offerors shall ensure that proposals are mailed or sent by courier in a timely manner to be delivered to the

NAVFAC Southwest facility no later than the date and time stated in Block 13 of the SF1442.

3. Pre-Proposal Conference

(a) A pre-proposal conference and site visit will not be conducted at this time.

(b) A list of Frequently-Asked-Questions (FAQ) with appropriate responses is provided as an attachment to the

RFP. All firms are encouraged to review the FAQ. The FAQ should be viewed prior to submitting any questions regarding the RFP.

(c) Failure of a prospective Offeror to submit any questions will be construed to mean that the Offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation.

(d) All prospective Offerors are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing. Amendments will be posted on the website at https://www.neco.navy.mil. However, if an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of any such amendment as described in Contract Clause “Amendment to Solicitations” of this section shall be applicable.

4. Financial Questionnaire https://www.neco.navy.mil/

Offerors shall submit the Financial Questionnaire to their financial institution and request the financial institution complete the questionnaire with regard to the Offeror’s firm. Upon completion of the questionnaire, the financial institution should place the completed questionnaire in a sealed envelope showing the return address of the financial institution and forward it to the Offeror so that the Offeror can include the questionnaire (in the sealed envelope) with the Offeror’s proposal.

If the Offeror is a joint venture, information should be submitted for the joint venture. If there is no information for the joint venture, information should be submitted for each joint venture partner.

5. Surety Form

Offerors shall submit the Surety Form to report their surety bonding information, verifying aggregate bonding capacity, current available bonding, as well as single project limit. Ensure the name of the Offeror’s surety, including the name and phone number of the Offeror’s agent within the surety, is shown on the form.

If the Offeror is a joint venture, one Surety Form shall be submitted for the joint venture, not the individual partners.

6. System for Award Management

The System for Award Management (SAM) is combining federal procurement systems and the Catalog of Federal

Domestic Assistance into one new system. This consolidation includes the functionality from the following systems:

* Central Contractor Registry (CCR)

* Federal Agency Registration (Fedreg)

* Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA)

* Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)

Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to award of a DoD contract. In order to participate on this solicitation, contractors must also complete electronic representations and certifications.

For more information and to complete the electronic Reps & Certs, see the SAM website at http://www.sam.gov. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor not registered in SAM. Remember to review the NAICS codes listed in your SAM record and make sure that you have listed the NAICS code for this procurement.

7. Federal Contractor Program

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.1303, any contractor or subcontractor with a contract of $100,000 or more with the Federal Government must take affirmative action to hire and promote qualified targeted veterans which includes, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam-era, recently separated veterans, and any other veterans who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized.

If subject to the reporting requirements, companies must file an annual VETS-4212 and/or VETS-4212A Report, which shows the number of targeted veterans in their work force by job category, hiring location, and number of new hires, including targeted veterans hired during the reporting period and the maximum number and minimum number of employees of such contractor during the period covered by the report. Instructions, information, and follow-up assistance is provided at VETS-4212 Internet site at http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm or employers may contact the VETS-4212 customer support at (866) 237-0275 or e-mail at mailto:VETS4212-customersupport@dol.gov.

Upon the successful submission of a VETS-4212 and/or VETS-4212A report(s), federal contractors will receive an email confirmation of receipt notification for their records. Offerors shall include a copy of their confirmation notification email in their proposal as verification of submission for the current reporting period. DO NOT

SUBMIT A COPY OF THE REPORT ITSELF. If this requirement is not applicable to your firm, provide a statement that your firm does not have any contracts subject to this requirement.

http://www.sam.gov/ http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm mailto:VETS4212-customersupport@dol.gov mailto:VETS4212-customersupport@dol.gov

A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor that has not submitted a required annual form VETS-4212, Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (VETS-4212 and/or VETS-4212A Report) if subject to the reporting requirements of 38 U.S.C. 4212(d) for that fiscal year.

8. Incurred Expenses

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

9. No Alternate or Multiple Proposals

Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposals will be considered in the evaluation.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION M

BASIS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Ability to Manage Multiple Simultaneous Projects

Factor 2 – Experience

Factor 3 – Past Performance

Factor 4 – Safety

Factor 5 – Price - Based on Proposed Task Order 0001 (Exhibit M)

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors:

Factor 1 (Ability to Manage Multiple Simultaneous Projects) will be rated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable for Factor 1, they will not be eligible for award. Factors 2 through 4 and price will be considered. The technical factors (2 and 4) are of equal importance to each other, respectively, and, when combined, are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 3, Past Performance). The combined non-price factors are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high, or low, as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Definitions:

DEFICIENCY: A material failure of a proposal to meet a solicitation requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

WEAKNESS: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

SIGNIFICANT WEAKNESS: A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

STRENGTH: An aspect of a proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

PAST PERFORMANCE: Relates to how well an Offeror and Offeror's Team has performed; e.g., the quality of work accomplished, schedule compliance, customer satisfaction.

EXPERIENCE: Pertains to work performed by an Offeror and Offeror's Team, within the prescribed timeframe, which is the same or similar to the work that may be ordered under this contract in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Experience is distinct from past performance (how well an Offeror has performed).

PROJECT: A design-build or design-bid-build construction activity or task, with a single starting point and a single ending point.

COMBINED PROJECT(S): Projects with multiple starting and ending points, performed under separate task orders, delivery orders, or multiple contracts combined in a single description. No credit will be given for work performed under MACC/IDIQ contracts in the aggregate or for multiple projects completed under more than one task/delivery order.

RENOVATION, REPAIR, ALTERATION PROJECT TYPES: Refers to projects where the work modifies existing facilities.

NEW CONSTRUCTION: Refers to creating entirely new facilities (or new expansions/ additions to existing facilities where a new structure and foundation are provided as part of the expansion/addition).

100% COMPLETE: The facility is completely constructed and ready for the intended use.

OFFEROR: Refers to the Contractor submitting the proposal as Offeror, including joint ventures, whose name and address appears in Block 14 of Standard Form (SF) 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award). In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between the Offeror's name and address cited on the SF 1442 and any other part of the proposal, the

SF 1442 is the conclusive document in determining the Offeror who is submitting the proposal.

JOINT VENTURE (JV): A legal business entity formed between two or more companies (parties) to undertake the performance activities of a contract together. This does not include other arrangements such as "teaming agreement" or "strategic alliance," which are not recognized as bona fide joint ventures for the purposes of this solicitation.

FIVE-YEAR PERIOD: The prescribed timeframe for this solicitation that refers to the period of time for which projects may be submitted for experience or past performance. The five-year period is calculated by counting back five years from the initial RFP issuance date.

DESIGN-BID-BUILD: Refers to the traditional delivery method where design and construction are sequential and contracted for separately, with two separate contracts and contractors; one for an A-E contract and one for a construction contract.

SELF-PERFORM: Refers to performing relevant, major construction trade work in-house without subcontractors.

This does not include project administration or management functions (such as quality control or safety program) and miscellaneous work (such as housekeeping or cleanup). Relevant, major construction trade work is that which is the same or similar to the work that may be ordered under this contract.

PAGE: Refers to one printed side of a piece of paper. (For example, 5 pieces of paper printed on both sides would result in 10 pages of narrative.)

FACTOR 1: ABILITY TO MANAGE MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS PROJECTS

a. Proposal Submission Requirements:

The current composition and proposed staffing of the firm to manage multiple simultaneous projects will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information under Tab “1”:

(1) Using Exhibit “A” (Current Composition and Proposed Staffing), provide a narrative describing the current

Offeror composition and the proposed staffing if awarded the single contract. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). On a separate sheet, include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

(2) In addition to the narrative, and if applicable, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or approved mentor-protégé agreement (MPA).

b. Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s current composition and proposed staffing will be used as a means to evaluate the

Offeror’s likely ability to manage multiple simultaneous projects. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or

Unacceptable basis.

FACTOR 2: EXPERIENCE (See definition)

Submit Exhibit “B” (Construction Experience Project Data Sheet) under Tab “2.”

Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrate your experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to projects that may be ordered under this contract. For purposes of this evaluation, relevant projects are further defined as commercial and institutional construction projects and associated related work within the construction cost range of $2,000 to $1,000,000.

In addition, the Offeror shall meet the following minimum requirements:

At least two (2) relevant construction projects shall have a construction cost of $500,000 or more. This refers to the total contract cost if the work was performed by the Offeror as prime contractor, and the subcontract cost if the work was performed by the Offeror as a subcontractor.

At least one project demonstrating self-performed construction experience.

Exhibit “B” must clearly address how the project meets the above requirements.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be 100% complete (see definition) within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit “B”) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (how the project meets the requirements listed above).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the

Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for the Joint

Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies

(name and address is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract.

Regarding any such submitted project, if the Offeror fails to demonstrate the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm’s meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, the project will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated.

The Offeror may not utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor.

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s Team’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects (5) for construction. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

Offerors who submit relevant projects that demonstrate experience self-performing major construction trade work on two (2) or more relevant construction projects may receive a higher rating than those who do not demonstrate self-performance (see definition).

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

Submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Exhibit “C”) and CCASS/ACASS/CPARS evaluations under Tab “2” immediately following each of the project data sheets to which they pertain. Submit any other past performance information under Tab “3.”

If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) or Contractor Performance Assessment

Rating System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in

Factor 2 for construction experience. If there is not a completed CCASS, ACASS, or CPARS evaluation, submit a

Past Performance Questionnaire (Exhibit “C”) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction

Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other

RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact Brad Crawford at bradley.crawford@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The

Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the recent, relevant projects submitted under Factor 2

– Experience. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance

Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee

Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s and design firms’ performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

With respect to relevancy, past performance of greater relevancy will have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive a Neutral Confidence rating.

FACTOR 4: SAFETY

Submit Exhibit “D” (Safety Data Sheet / Safety Narrative) under Tab “4.” Individual blocks on this form may be expanded.

For a partnership or joint venture, EMR, DART, and TRC rates are required for each entity that is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR) – Submit data for three previous calendar years’ (2015, 2016, 2017).

This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the Offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends shall be addressed as part of the element.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case

(TRC) Rates - Submit data for three previous calendar years’ (2015, 2016, 2017). If an Offeror cannot submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively shall be addressed as part of this element.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety – Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The

Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. The

Offeror shall describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps, including a description of your “Good

Catch” Program. A “Good Catch” Program is defined as a program that recognizes and rewards employees for reporting unsafe and/or unhealthful situations and acts to create a climate of trust and safety. The program should also have procedures in place to address deficiencies and unsafe situations immediately and to document those actions accordingly. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to one-double sided page or two single-sided pages.

Note: For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements above are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The safety factor evaluation will collectively consider the following three submittal requirements:

EMR – The Government will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

OSHA DART and TRC rates – The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

Technical Approach to Safety –The Government will evaluate the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project as well as the degree to which the Offeror’s safety management system will ensure safety compliance of self-performed and subcontracted work, including innovative methods to monitor safe work practices. The

Government will also evaluate the Offeror’s methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps including its “Good Catch” Program.

While the Government may elect to use other sources of information in evaluating safety to include, but not limited to OSHA, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management

System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

FACTOR 5: PRICE – Based on Proposed Task Order 0001 (Exhibit M)

The Offeror (see definition) shall complete and submit (in a sealed envelope) the following in the order shown below under Tab “5” of the original proposal only.

SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with blocks 14 through 20c completed;

-priced and Non-pre-priced coefficients;

in the contract minimum guarantee amount of $5,000);

used to provide pricing; and

Completed Exhibit K Coefficient Breakdown Form with Profit Language

NOTE: If Section B shows multiple sites with different pre-priced and non-pre-priced coefficients, a separate Exhibit K must be submitted for proposed coefficients for each site UNLESS the offeror is proposing one (1) Pre-priced and one (1) Non-pre-priced coefficient to cover all sites.

With regard to price as shown on the SF 1442, the only Contract Line Item that Offerors are to complete is Line

Item 0002 of Section B SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES for Proposed Task Order 0001.

Failure to submit a Bid Bond conforming to the requirements of the solicitation may result in an Offeror's proposal being rejected as unacceptable.

The price proposal for Proposed Task Order 0001 will be evaluated to determine the reasonableness and completeness of the Offeror’s proposal. The following techniques will be used to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

- Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation.

- Comparison of proposed prices with the independent Government estimate.

In addition, one or more of the following techniques may also be utilized:

- Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

- Comparison of proposed prices with resources proposed.

(End of Summary of Changes)