Amendment_0003_Q855_SF30.pdf
PDF 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6247317R0823
About this file
Amendment_0003_Q855_SF30.pdf
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_0002_Q855_SF30.pdf | ||
| Website Link | — | |
| Website Link | — | |
| Amendment_0001_Q855_SF30.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ACQR4771931
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Q-855, BASIC TRAINING COMMAND FOR NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND AT NAVAL
AMPHIBIOUS BASE, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA
The purpose of this Amendment is to provide responses to RFIs.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 3
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 01-Dec-2017
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247317R0823
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
08-Nov-2017
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
01-Dec-2017
CODE
NAVFAC SOUTHWEST
COASTAL IPT CODE ROPMA
NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO
2730 MCKEAN ST BLDG 291
SAN DIEGO CA 92136
N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N6247317R0823
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0003
AMENDMENT 0003:
Subject: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL N62473-17-R-0823, DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Q-855, BASIC TRAINING COMMAND FOR NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND AT NAVAL
AMPHIBIOUS BASE, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA
Date: December 1, 2017
A. The information below is provided in response to the Request for Information:
Contractor RFI #9: The Proposal Submission Requirements for Factor 1 require Offerors to submit a “technical approach narrative” and Organization Chart, not to exceed 2 pages (combined). The RFP also includes Exhibit “A”
- Offeror Team Composition and Management, but there is no mention of this Exhibit in the Submission requirements for Factor 1 (or any other Factor). Exhibit “A” also states a 2-page limit. Is Exhibit “A” required?
Under which Factor shall it be submitted? For the page limits, is the requirement for a 1-page narrative, plus a 1-page Organization Chart, plus the 2-page Exhibit “A”?
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Attachments A (Offeror Team Composition and Management), C (Surety Form), D (Construction Experience Project Data Sheet), E (Design Experience Project Data Sheet), G (Safety Data Sheet), and K (Financial Questionnaire) are all mandatory. Attachment B (Offeror’s Team Consent Form for the Release of Past and Present Performance Information to the Prime Contractor) is requested if applicable, see the information provided on the top of Attachment B.
The Offeror shall utilize Attachment A (Offeror Team Composition Management) to provide the submission requirements for Factor 1 – Technical Approach. As stated in Factor 1, the technical approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart.
Contractor RFI #10: The Proposal Submission Requirements for Factor 1 require Offerors to submit a “technical approach narrative” and Organization Chart, not to exceed 2 pages (combined). In addition to the narrative, Factor 1 requires Offerors to “submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team”. The RFP also includes Attachment B - Offeror’s Team Consent Form, but there is no mention of this Attachment in the Submission requirements for Factor 1 (or any other Factor). Is Attachment B required? Is Attachment B required instead of, or in addition to the signed agreement? Under which Factor shall it be submitted? If part of Factor 1, please confirm that Attachment B does not count against the 2-page limit.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Attachment B (Offeror’s Team Consent Form for the Release of Past and Present Performance Information to the Prime Contractor) is requested if applicable. As the stated in the Offeror’s Team Consent Form, past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s consent. Because a prime contractor is considered a private party, the Government requires the consent of the subcontractor/teaming partner before disclosing past and present performance information to the prime contractor during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government in evaluating past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that a consent form be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in Factor 1 of the Offeror’s proposal.
N6247317R0823
The form is to be completed by the entity that is providing consent to the prime contractor. Use the form (one per entity) to provide consent to allow the Government to discuss the entity’s past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.
Submit Attachment B (if applicable) with Attachment A (Offeror Team Composition and Management) under Factor 1 – Technical Approach. Attachment B is NOT included in the page limitation set for technical approach narrative.
Contractor RFI #11: The Proposal Submission Requirements for Factor 2 Experience, (2) Design Experience, Page 16 of 60 states: “The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor.” Both Factor 1 and Factor 2 reference a requirement to submit “a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment”. However, neither Factor 1 nor Factor 2 identifies which parties are required to submit the supporting agreement. If an Offeror is utilizing a “Design Subcontractor” comprised of two individual Design Firms, what is required to satisfy the submission requirements? It is not clear what entities should be a party to the referenced “joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, etc.” Should the submitted agreement be a single agreement between the two individual Design firms?
Should the submitted agreement be between the “Teamed Design Entity” (i.e., the Joint Venture Design Subcontractor) and the two individual Design Firms? Should the submitted agreement be between each individual Design Firm (not the “Design Subcontractor” entity which is comprised of the two individual design firms) and the Offeror (Contractor), meaning we would submit (2) separate agreements? Should the submitted agreement be between the Joint Venture Design Subcontractor and the Offeror (Contractor)?
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Offerors proposing multiple design firms shall submit a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each design subcontractor identified in Factor 1 – Technical Approach.
Contractor RFI #12: RFP 00210 Basis of Award, Paragraph 4. Phase I Basis of Evaluation/Submission Requirements/Criteria Description, Page 13: Factor 1 – Technical Approach states that there will be a two page narrative to address composition and management of the firms proposed. We are assuming that this information will be on the Exhibit A, Offeror Team Composition and Management, even though the Factor 1 in the RFP does not ask for the Exhibit. Please confirm that this information is to be inserted into the Exhibit A form.
Also, if this information will be inserted into the Exhibit A form, an org chart would have to be so small that it would be unreadable. Please consider removing the Org Chart from the page limitation.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: See Government response to RFI #9.
NOTE: ALL OTHER PARAGRAPHS, PROVISIONS, AND CONDITIONS TO RFP N62473-17-R-0823
REMAIN UNCHANGED. THE OFFEROR MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF ALL AMENDMENTS
ON THE OFFER SCHEDULE.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it.