Amendment_0002_Q855_SF30.pdf

ACQR4771931

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Q-855, BASIC TRAINING COMMAND FOR NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND AT NAVAL

AMPHIBIOUS BASE, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA

The purpose of this Amendment is to provide responses to RFIs.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Nov-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247317R0823

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-Nov-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Nov-2017

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

COASTAL IPT CODE ROPMA

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO

2730 MCKEAN ST BLDG 291

SAN DIEGO CA 92136

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247317R0823

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

AMENDMENT 0002:

Subject: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL N62473-17-R-0823, DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT

Q-855, BASIC TRAINING COMMAND FOR NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND AT NAVAL

AMPHIBIOUS BASE, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA

Date: November 27, 2017

A. The information below is provided in response to the Request for Information:

Contractor RFI #4: RFP Part 1 Section 00210, Factor 3 – Past Performance, Evaluation Factors, Pages 15-16 of 52: If the Offeror has a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ-0) on file previously completed by the Client that matches all fields of the required Exhibit F may this be submitted in lieu of requesting a new PPQ specific to this solicitation?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, a previously completed PPQ may be submitted in lieu of requesting a new PPQ specific to this solicitation.

Contractor RFI #5: RFP Part 1 Section 00210, Factor 3 – Past Performance, Evaluation Factors, Pages 15-16 of 52: Factor 3 - Past Performance requests inclusion of CPARS evaluations. Please confirm: If the Offeror was both the Prime Contractor and Designer of Record on a project (and was not issued a separate AE CPARS/ACASS evaluating the DOR effort), may the same CPARS/CCASS be provided for both Construction and Design Experience – or – is it preferred that a PPQ evaluating solely Design performance be provided?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The same CCASS or ACASS may be provided only if the CCASS or ACASS addresses both the Construction and Design Experience of the project. Otherwise, the Offeror must provide completed PPQ in the proposal for projects that do not have a completed CCASS or ACASS.

Contractor RFI #6: RFP 4. PHASE I Basis of Evaluation/Submission Requirements/Criteria Description, Factor 3

– Past Performance: (a), Pages 15 & 16 of 52 of pdf: Paragraph (a) of Factor 3 – Past Performance, directs offerors to request past performance questionnaires from customers regarding the offeror’s (design and construction) performance on the projects featured in Factor 2 - Experience. In recent years, many federal agencies have allowed offerors to submit copies of completed PPQs that have been previously submitted with other proposals. This approach has proven to be much more convenient to customers because it streamlines the evaluation process, simplifies the logistics of sending PPQs, and reduces the number of times offerors need to impose on their customers to fill out PPQs. We respectfully request that the government adopt this well-established and effective approach to providing customer past performance evaluation. Please confirm that it is acceptable to submit federal PPQs (e.g., DoD PPQ-0 format) previously submitted in other proposals.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: See Government response to RFI #4.

Contractor RFI #7: 4. PHASE I Basis of Evaluation/Submission Requirements/Criteria Description, Factor 3 – Past Performance: (a), Pages 15 & 16 of 52 of pdf: In a government design-build project where the prime construction contractor holds the design-build contract, government clients are frequently unwilling to fill out PPQs

N6247317R0823 for the contractor’s AE design-partner, since there is no direct contractual relationship between that government client and the AE firm. Please clarify if a PPQ, filled out by the design-build contractor, is an acceptable evaluation for the AE partner’s design past performance, since the contractor is a client of that AE firm.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No, PPQs filled out by the design-build contractor shall not be accepted. Also, see Government response to RFI #5.

Contractor RFI #8: 4. PHASE I Basis of Evaluation/Submission Requirements/Criteria Description, Factor 3 – Past Performance: (a), Pages 15 & 16 of 52 of pdf: Since an ACASS or design firm CPAR is not available for government design-build contracts, please confirm if it is acceptable for a design-build prime contractor (as the Offeror) to submit the design-build prime contractor’s CPAR or CCASS evaluation as evidence of past performance of the design partner, if the design partner of the featured project is the same as the proposed design partner.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: See Government response to RFI #5.

NOTE: ALL OTHER PARAGRAPHS, PROVISIONS, AND CONDITIONS TO RFP N62473-17-R-0823

REMAIN UNCHANGED. THE OFFEROR MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF ALL AMENDMENTS

ON THE OFFER SCHEDULE.

(End of Summary of Changes)