N6247025R0010 Synopsis Petrolem Oils Lubricant (POL) Mgmt.pdf

Revised JAN 2026

N6247025R0010

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT ENGINEER SERVICES FOR PETROLEUM, OILS AND LUBRICANTS

(POL) MANAGEMENT, WASTE/ HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT, TOXIC

SUBSTANCES CONTROL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR NAVY, MARINE CORPS, AND OTHER DOW

INSTALLATIONS, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A

STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS

CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD.

This procurement is for a single Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for petroleum, oil and lubricant management for Navy, Marine Corps and other DOW installations and federal agencies, but may also include work worldwide. The general geographic area of the anticipated contract is primarily Naval District Washington (NDW), Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic (CNRMA), Commander, Navy Region Southeast (CNRSE), Commander, Navy Region Europe Africa Central (CNREURAFCENT). These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised).

The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $140,000,000.00. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term is $10,000. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is December 2026.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330. The size standard for this code is $25.5 million. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study, Sources Sought Number: N62470-25-R-0010 conducted by NAVFAC Atlantic included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit this procurement on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition.

The NAVFAC Atlantic small business office concurs with this decision.

The intent of this contract is to provide comprehensive Architectural-Engineering (A-E) services to various Navy and other Department of War (DOW) installations / organizations world-wide in order to meet statutory compliance requirements for all applicable Final Governing Standards (FGS), DOW, Federal, State, local, and installation specific environmental laws, regulations, and guidance pertaining to the major work categories listed below. This support includes preparation of studies, plans, specifications, design documents, reports, cost estimates and all associated engineering work including but not limited to work in the following major categories:

Primary Tasks:

- Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) and Assets Compliance

- Oil Spill Preparedness and Planning Compliance

- Waste/Hazardous Material Management Compliance

Miscellaneous Tasking:

- PCB/Radon/Lead Based Paint (LBP) and Asbestos Management

- Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and Clean Water Act Compliance

- Laboratory Work

- Pesticide Management

- Environmental Condition of Property Programs

- Sustainability Work

- Air Quality and Clean Air Act (CAA) Compliance

- Environmental Management System (EMS) and Compliance Auditing Support

Work may include minor incidental system modifications and calibrations at various facilities associated with individual task order work in order to assure compliance and allow for certification and/or testing. Examples of such minor incidental system modifications may include installing a high point vent in a fuel pipe to allow for leak testing, installing a temporary blind flange in a fuel pipe to allow for leak testing a system, repairing an air filter door and replacing an air filter to allow for air emission certification of an incinerator, minor repair of an existing Back-Flow Prevention (BFP) device to allow for proper operation and certification, or other similar modifications.

The primary tasks anticipated under this contract are:

(1) Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) and Assets Compliance - The completion of PST inventories, notification forms, and management plans; certified tank inspections; third party professional engineering certification for new tank installations, tank closures and major repairs; integrity evaluations of petroleum pipelines including inspections and intelligent pigging; installation of monitoring wells, soil and groundwater sampling and analysis, completion of site checks at suspected leaking PST sites (including disposal of petroleum contaminated soil from boring and well installations) and development of corrective action plan; training of tank custodians on operations, inspections, and maintenance of PSTs and supporting equipment including automated PST inventory control and tank/line leak detection systems. Also, may include tank removal closure plan development; tank/pipe leak tightness testing; petroleum system cathodic protection testing; release detection equipment testing/certification; spill bucket testing; pipe interstitial integrity testing; pipe sump interstitial integrity testing; overfill prevention equipment testing; PST integrity testing; and PST level gauge calibration. Generate, review, amend, and certify Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plans, Pipeline Integrity Management Plans (PIMP), Operation, Maintenance, Environmental, and Safety Plans (OMES); and conduct prepare and provide oil handling personnel training.

The preparation of detailed construction planning engineering documents including budget estimates and DD Form 1391’s may also be required for petroleum facility upgrade projects required in order to meet environmental regulations, such as to correct deficiencies noted in an installation SPCC plan or to correct UST system deficiencies. Additionally, construction design Request for Proposal (RFP) package development for both design-bid-build and design-build type construction projects may be required, along with associated support such as post construction award services consultation.

(2) Oil Spill Preparedness and Planning Compliance - Preparation/modification of plans and manuals such as Facility Response Plans (FRP); Oil and Hazardous Substance (OHS) Spill Contingency Plans; OHS Spill Response Plans; Integrated Contingency Response Plans (ICP);

designing, conducting, and evaluating drills and exercises to meet the National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) Guidelines; designing, conducting, and evaluating joint Navy On-Scene Coordinator (NOSC) Program/Emergency Management Program all risk/all hazard exercises; conducting NOSC and other Spill Response Training; design of OHS Spill Contingency Plan facilities; and also may include NOSC Plan Updates and Natural Resources Damage Assessment pre-incident plans.

(3) Waste/ Hazardous Material Management Compliance –The Waste Management Program including the preparation or revision of documents, plans, and reports in support of the Navy and Marine Corp’s Hazardous Waste (HW), Solid Waste (SW), Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB), Regulated Medical Waste (RMW), Pollution Prevention (P2), Emergency Planning and Community Right To Know Act (EPCRA), Hazardous Material (HM), Waste Material Potentially Posing an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH); Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Programs. Environmental documentation includes management, minimization, characterization, documentation, disposition, contingency, evaluation, elimination, closure and decontamination plans and studies; site investigations and evaluations;

P2 Plans and opportunity assessments; HW Management Plans; EPCRA toxic release inventory (TRI) Form R Reports; Non TRI EPCRA Reporting; and permit applications. The work required may include site surveys; document reviews; soil, water, sediment, gaseous sampling and analysis; soil gas surveys; monitoring well installations and well testing; aerial and/or on-site photography; groundwater modeling and geophysical contamination migration; risk assessments and air modeling; and designs and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS) for environmental restorations.

(4) Miscellaneous tasking to support other environmental compliance technical requirements (laboratory work, pesticide management, environmental condition of property programs, sustainability work, Environmental Management System (EMS) and compliance auditing support), and other technical media (water; air; radon; or asbestos) that may be incidental to petroleum storage tank and assets compliance, oil spill preparedness and planning compliance, and/or waste/hazardous material management compliance such as follow on studies; GIS mapping; computer aided design and drafting (CADD) drawing production; database development and/or management; pilot studies; audits; surveys; inventories; monitoring;

inspections; production of reports, work plans, and safety plans; development of specialized environmental compliance training; and other AE services as specified by contract task order.

Collection and management of Other Environmental Liabilities (OEL) data as well as engineering studies and other environmental compliance support for the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) environmental program may also be required.

Interested firms are advised to ensure System of Award Management (SAM) registration is current at time of offer submission and at time of award. To be eligible for award, your firm(s) must be registered in the SAM database. For instructions on registering with SAM, see the SAM website at https://sam.gov/.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. Evaluation Criteria (1) and (2) are considered most important and equal between themselves; Criteria (3) through (6) are slightly less important and equal among themselves; Criteria (7) has the least importance and Criterion (8) will be used as a tiebreaker among technically equal firms. Specific selection criteria include:

1. Specialized Experience

2. Professional Qualifications

3. Past Performance

4. Quality Control

5. Program Management and Capacity

6. Firm Location

7. Commitment to Small Business

8. Volume of Work

Criterion 1- Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in:

1. Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) and Assets Compliance

2. Oil Spill Preparedness and Planning Compliance https://sam.gov/

3. Waste/Hazardous Material Management Compliance

Submission requirements: Provide a maximum of five (5) projects completed, meaning the projected was finished, within the past five (5) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Sufficient information to determine the date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

At least three (3) of the five (5) projects submitted must be in the principal geographic area of this contract. NOTE: Although Navy Regions are used to identify the principal geographic area, experience submitted under this criterion does not necessarily have to have taken place at Navy installations; rather, experience at any site(s) located in the same geographic region(s) can be used to meet this requirement. Offerors demonstrating experience performing work in accordance with DOW/Navy policy and guidance may be considered more favorably.

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract.

Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the Unique Entity Identifier number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name.” Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted; however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects may be submitted for either joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of five (5) projects. At least one project shall be submitted from each joint venture partner. The combined experience must still meet the requirement that at least three (3) projects demonstrate experience in providing services covering the principal geographic area of this contract. Firms failing to provide projects from all joint venture partners will be considered to have not met the requirements of the criterion.

Projects submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F shall be completed projects. Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 1.

Criterion 2- Professional Qualifications (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects as outlined in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are program managers, quality control personnel, task order managers, and project managers.

Submission Requirements:

Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract in the SF330, Part I, Section E. Resumes are limited to one page each and should indicate: professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines, include professional registration of the engineering and surveying staff;

cite recent project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Criterion 3- Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight.

Submission Requirements:

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Code CON 21, Attn: Nicole Smith via email at nicole.smith100.civ@ua.navy.mil, prior to the response date.

Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 4- Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements:

Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract, technical accuracy and assurance of overall coordination of plans and specifications, and engineering, and environmental and design services.

4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

Criterion 5- Program Management and Capacity (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract and the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time.

Submission Requirements:

1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

Criterion 6—Firm Location (SF330, Part I, Section H)

Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily Naval District Washington (NDW), Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic (CNRMA), Commander, Navy Region Southeast (CNRSE), Commander, Navy Region Europe Africa Central (CNREURAFCENT), Submission Requirements:

1. Indicate location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members.

2. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract.

Criterion 7—Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which they have identified and committed to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran- Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on factors: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement.

In support of evaluation factor (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. In support of evaluation factor(A), Large Businesses (LBs) shall submit three (3) “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of comparable size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above. If ISRs are not final or most recent they will not be considered. The most recent reporting period is 30 September 2025;

therefore, any ISR submitted that is not final must be from the 30 September 2025 reporting period to be considered. Failure to provide three (3) ISRs that comply with the requirements will result in a NOT MET for this criterion, unless ISRs for similar contracts of comparable size are not available. If ISRs for similar contracts of comparable size are not available, LBs shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of comparable size. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation.

In support of evaluation factor (A), Small Businesses (SBs) shall also submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of comparable size.

In support of evaluation factor (B), LBs shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command goals for FY2026 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals:

FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030

SB 40% 40% 40% 40% 40%

HUBZone 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%

SDVOSB 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%

SBD 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%

WOSB 9% 9% 9% 9% 9%

If a LB firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.109, FAR 19.206, FAR 19.302, DFARS 219.109, DFARS 219.206, and DFARS

219.302 will be required and incorporated into the contract award. The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template Attachment (B) shall be used by LBs to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from SBs; however, in support of (B), SBs shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to LB, SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541330, Engineering Services, size standard $25.5million.

Criterion 8—Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOW Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOW within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOW A&E contracts.

Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF-330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11-point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 75 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Please include your Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the

SF-330.

**In accordance with the FAR 36.202-3(d), contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

Offerors shall submit one (1) electronic copy of their response to this Synopsis via the PIEE Solicitation Module.

Submission, modification, revision and withdrawal of responses shall be via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module at https://piee.eb.mil. Responses received after the due date and time will not be considered or evaluated. The Government will not be responsible for any failure of receipt of the response or any failure of the Offeror to verify receipt of the response. The electronic copies of the responses shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Word 2016, PDF, MS Excel 2016 and MS PowerPoint 2016, as applicable. Please note that any submissions by any other method in place of the PIEE Solicitation Module WILL NOT be accepted and will not be evaluated. To submit your response on the PIEE Solicitation Portal, Offerors will first need to register for the PIEE ‘Proposal Manager’ role. For step-by-step instructions, see The PIEE Vendor Registration Guide Attachment (C) or “Vendor Access Instructions” at:

https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/sitepages/solicitation-module.

Responses received by the Government by 2:00PM ET on 04 May 2026 will be considered.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The point of contact is Nicole Smith Contract Specialist, at nicole.smith100.civ@us.navy.mil.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to Nicole Smith, Contract Specialist at nicole.smith100.civ@us.navy.mil.

Questions will be accepted until 2:00PM Eastern Time 13 April 2026.

https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/sitepages/solicitation-module