N6247024R0061 Synopsis Revision02.pdf

N62470-24-R-0061 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF NAVY AND MARINE

CORPS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WORK PREDOMINANTLY

LOCATED IN CONUS-EAST COAST (The geographic area covered by this contract primarily encompasses the United States East Coast, Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia and the adjacent waters of the Atlantic Ocean, Including the Caribbean). HOWEVER, TASKS ASSOCIATED

WITH THIS CONTRACT MAY BE ASSIGNED ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD

FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN.

THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

Attachments: (a) Past Performance Questionnaire

(b) Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template

(c) LRA Commercial Vehicle Inspection Procedures

(d) SECNAV FORM 5512/1

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for preparation of Navy and Marine Corps Planning and Engineering Services for projects located primarily in the Continental United States (CONUS) East Coast, the adjacent waters of the Atlantic Ocean, including the Caribbean and Europe, Africa and Southwest Asia, but may also include work worldwide. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $95,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000.

There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is June 2025.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330, Engineering Services. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm for this contract to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study (Sources Sought Number: N62470-24-R-0061) conducted by NAVFAC Atlantic included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit this procurement on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition. The NAVFAC Atlantic small business office concurs with this decision.

The primary types of services expected to be performed under this contract include, but are not limited to:

(a) PLANS: Global Shore Infrastructure Plans (GSIPs), Installation Development Plans (IDPs), Installation Climate Resilience Plans (ICRPs), Area Development Plans (ADPs), Regional

Integration Plans (RIPs); Functional Plans; Maintenance and Sustainment Plans; Integrated Product Support Plans; Encroachment Action Plans (EAPs); Family Housing and Bachelor Quarters Comprehensive Neighborhood Plans (CNPs); Activity Overview Plans;

Installation Appearance Plans (IAPs - formerly Base Exterior Architecture Plans (BEAPs)), Installation Optimization and Modernization Plans.

(b) PROJECT PLANNING DOCUMENTS: The preparation of Military Construction (MILCON) and Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) Special Project Planning Documentation (DD Form 1391 project documentation) using the Government’s project development software. Preparation of: Construction Cost Estimates, Preliminary and Parametric Cost Estimates, Siting-Land Use Studies/Analyses; Special Site Approvals (EMR, Ordnance, Airfield, etc.); Economic Analyses (EAs) using the latest version of the Government’s ECONPACK software; Asset Evaluations (AEs); Basic Facility Requirements (BFRs) Documentation; Facilities Planning Documents (FPDs) using the Government’s web-based iNFADS program; Preliminary Hazard Analyses (PHAs);

Preliminary Hazard Lists (PHLs), Sustainable Design Studies based on US Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) concepts and scoring procedures.

(c) STUDIES: Concept Studies; Special Planning Studies, Business Case Analysis Studies, Traffic/Parking/Movement (Pedestrian & Vehicular) Studies; Facilities Planning Studies, Feasibility Studies, Analysis of Alternatives, Safety Studies, Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ); Range Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (RAICUZ) studies; site studies; facilities life cycle studies; Activity Planning and Management Models (APMMs), Electronic Land Use/Planning tools/studies.

(d) Integrated Product Support (IPS) and Integrated Logistics Systems (ILS) studies, to include surveys, facility management plans, requirements and criteria generation, and logistics element manager support.

In addition, Contractor should comply with the References listed on page 13 and all other relevant guidance regarding CUI.

The secondary types of services expected to be performed under this contract include, but are not limited to:

(a) INSTALLATION GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION & SERVICES (IGI&S): Navy Installation Geospatial Information and Services (IGI&S) vector data assets, which are stored and maintained in an ESRI Spatial Data Engine (SDE) enterprise geodatabase environment. The data and GIS applications used to manage it are accessed remotely allowing Navy IGI&S data and applications to be shared universally via data and application servers across the corporate enterprise rather than residing on a desktop or LAN shared drive.

The Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment (SDSFIE) is the Department of Defense (DoD) family of spatial standards and models that supports common implementation and maximizes interoperability for installation, environment, and civil work missions. The Navy IGI&S program employs an approved registered adaption of the DoD SDSFIE; registered as the Navy Data Model (NDM). The NDM schema defines the set of features, attribution, and metadata for enterprise geospatial data collected by or on behalf of the Navy.

The Navy IGI&S Data Collection Guidance (DCG) defines the standard for geospatial data collection and extraction methodology under the Navy IGI&S Program. The Navy IGI&S DCG is a complement to the NDM. The NDM defines what data to collect, and the DCG defines how to collect it.

Geospatial data shall be compliant with the OSD approved Navy Data Model (NDM) and compatible with ESRI ArcGIS software. Geospatial data must be exported directly from Navy GIS G-AVD Maintenance and Analysis (M&A) NDM environment on a project-by-project (task order) basis, and pursuant to a Navy IGI&S Data Release Agreement.

The government may provide required geospatial data to the A/E as an exported ESRI File Geodatabase or via access to Navy GIS hosted system such as GRX or M&A.

Access to the Navy GIS requires that each user hold a valid Navy-issued CAC. The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) shall serve as the single government point-of-contact for issuance of CACs. All geospatial data deliverables shall comply with the NDM, DCG data specifications, and Navy IGI&S Standards and Specifications for Vector GIS Deliverables.

All GIS data deliverables must conform to the following Navy IGI&S technical specifications found in the Navy IGI&S Standards and Specifications for Vector GIS Deliverables document and feature-level DCG prior to acceptance:

- Vector Data Delivery Methods

- Database format and software version

- Vector Data Standard

- Spatial Reference

- Feature Class geometry

- Horizontal and Vertical Spatial Accuracy

- Geometric Topology Rules

- Feature Attributes

- Data Authority and Duplication Protocols

- Metadata standards

- Symbology

(b) Development and update of Navy, Marine Corps, Army and Air Force facility planning criteria, standards and associated documents.

(c) EVENTS: Visioning and Scenario workshops/Planning, Functional Analysis Concept Development (FACD) sessions (design charrettes), facilitated charrettes.

(d) Documentation related to the above planning services, including charrettes, presentations, briefing materials and reports.

(e) Minor Design efforts to include, but not limited to, preparation of Request for Proposals (RFPs) to support Design/Build construction contracts.

(f) Customer Concept Designs (CCDs) to support preparing better estimates.

(g) Three-dimensional virtual environment (3DVE) modeling.

Interested firms are advised to ensure registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is current at time of offer and must remain valid through award of a contract. If SAM registration lapses during the solicitation and evaluation period, the offer will no longer be eligible for award. For instructions on registering with SAM, see the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or may disqualify the firm from further consideration. Evaluation Criteria 1 through 3 are considered the most important and equal among themselves; Criteria 4 and 5 are slightly less important and equal between themselves; Criteria 6 is of lesser importance; and Criteria 7 is of the least importance and will be used as a tiebreaker among technically equal firms.

Specific selection criteria include:

1. Specialized Experience

2. Professional Qualifications

3. Program Management, Capacity, and Firm Location

4. Past Performance

5. Quality Control

6. Commitment to Small Business

7. Volume of Work

Criterion 1- Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in:

1. Global or Multi-Regional Planning (such as GSIPs, Integrated Products Support Plans and Functional Plans)

a. Global or multi-regional planning is defined as infrastructure planning that is strategic in nature, crosses regions and performs analysis that provides actionable recommendations, develops courses of action, or prioritizes identified infrastructure capability gaps, that influence decision making across multiple regions. Repetitious planning actions, such as Basic Facility Requirements or Asset Evaluations, performed in two or more regions under a single task order in which each planning action is separate, and only affects the individual installation or region where the planning action is proposed, will not qualify as global and multi-regional planning.

2. Regional Planning (Such as Regional Integration Plans (RIPs))

a. Regional Planning is defined as infrastructure planning that is strategic in nature, crosses installations within a single region. Regional planning also performs analysis that leads to actionable recommendations, develops courses of action, or prioritizes identified infrastructure capability gaps that influence decision making across multiple installations across a single region.

Repetitious planning actions, such as Basic Facility Requirements or asset Evaluations, performed at two or more installation sunder a single task order in which each planning action is separate, and only affects the individual installation where the planning action is proposed, will not qualify as regional planning.

3. Installation Planning (such as IDPs, ICRPs, ADPs, AICUZ, Encroachment Action Plans, Traffic/Parking Movement Studies, and Siting/Land Use Studies),

4. Business Case Analysis Studies,

5. 1391 Project Planning Documentation,

6. Shore Facility Planning System (Asset Evaluations/Basic Facility Requirements/

Facility Planning Documents).

Firms may be considered more favorably by demonstrating the following:

1. Specialized experience within the primary geographic area of this contract, the Continental United States (CONUS) East Coast, the adjacent waters of the Atlantic Ocean, including the Caribbean and Europe, Africa, and U.S. Central Command and may be evaluated more favorably commensurate with the extent of their experience in the various locations covered in the primary geographic area.

2. Experience on projects self-performed by the Joint Venture as a whole may be viewed more favorable than projects submitted by individual partner(s).

3. Experience on projects performed under Federal contracts may be considered more favorably, with experience under DoD contracts being viewed more favorably than experience with other Federal agencies.

4. Experience with similar requirements performed in accordance with latest NAVFAC policies, programs, or systems.

Submission requirements: Provide a maximum of eight (8) projects completed within the past five (5) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Sufficient information to determine the date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. If more than the maximum number of projects is submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

Sufficient and concise information to determine the relevancy of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered.

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract.

Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the Unique Entity Identifier along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name.” Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project may be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted; however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects must be submitted for each joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of eight (8) projects. Firms failing to provide at least one project from each joint venture partner will be considered to have not met the requirements of the criterion.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects.

Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project unless there are stand-alone CLINs provided in the base IDIQ contract for work that was completed. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers may result in a firm being excluded from evaluation or considered less qualified.

All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 1.

Criterion 2- Professional Qualifications (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G. Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are Project Manager, Architect, Engineer, Planner, Waterfront Specialist, Aviation Specialist, Range Planner, Industrial Engineer, CADD Specialist, GIS Specialist, Cost Engineer, and Economist. Engineers and Architects must be licensed in their respective disciplines. Sustainability Specialist, Environmental disciplines, Transportation Planner, Mechanical Engineer, Civil Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Landscape Architect, and Interior Design are desired but not necessarily required.

Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one page each and should indicate: professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent (within the past five (5) years) project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract, and specifically indicate the person’s proposed role in this contract as follows:

(a) For the projects outlined in Criterion 1, demonstrate experience in the following:

1) Technical disciplines (such as planning, engineering, cost estimating, etc.)

2) Project Management including work plans and oversight

3) Preparing studies and analyses

(b) For all other contracts, including Federal and DoD contracts, demonstrate experience in the following:

1) Program and task order level management and administration

2) Quality control management and administration

Firms should not use other company titles such as “Type I Engineer” where the discipline and role are unidentifiable. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Criterion 3-Program Management, Capacity, and Location (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time, on the locations of their office(s) that will be performing the work under this contract, and demonstrated knowledge of the primary geographic areas in which projects could be located.

Submission Requirements:

1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable. Teams with a demonstrated history of working together may be considered more favorably.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

3. Provide the location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the primary geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily the Continental United States (CONUS) East Coast, the adjacent waters of the Atlantic Ocean, including the Caribbean and Europe, Africa and Southwest Asia. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas in which projects could be located.

Criterion 4-Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for projects submitted under Criterion 1 which may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government (including contacts with points of contact in other criteria). NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight.

Submission Requirements:

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form (Attachment (A)) as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Atlantic, Code CON22, Attn: Stacy Harper-Mitchell via email at stacy.l.harper-mitchell.civ@us.navy.mil and copy to Kathleen Delashmitt via email at kathleen.a.delashmitt.civ@us.navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 5-Quality Control (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements:

Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract to include processes for shore infrastructure plans (global, regional, and installation specific); business case analyses; DD1391 project documentation; and Shore Facility Planning System products.

4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

Criterion 6 —Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which they have identified and committed to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business

(WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran- Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement.

In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Large Businesses (LBs) shall submit three “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of comparable size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT they will not be considered. The MOST RECENT reporting period is 30 September 2024; therefore, any ISR submitted that is not FINAL must be from the 30 September 2024 reporting period to be considered. Failure to provide three (3) ISRs that comply with the requirements will result in a NOT MET for this criterion, unless ISRs for similar contracts of comparable size are not available. If ISRs for similar contracts of comparable size are not available, LBs shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of comparable size. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation for each unmet goal.

Small Businesses (SBs) shall submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of comparable size.

In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command goals for FY2025 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals:

FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029

SB 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00%

HubZone 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%

SDVOSB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

SDB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

WOSB 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00%

If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFARS Subpart 219.7 will be required and incorporated into the contract award. The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template shall be used by LBs to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses; however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541330, Engineering Services, with a size standard $25,500,000.

Criterion 7—Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD A&E contracts.

Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF- 330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11-point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 60 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11-point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables).

Please include your Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330.

**In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration (e.g., provide state registration number). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration. Firms that submit SF-330s that are not in compliance with DFARS 236.602-70, Restriction on award of overseas architect-engineer contracts to foreign firms, may be eliminated from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation. Joint Venture Firms are discouraged from using “Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command” or “NAVFAC” in its joint venture name.

Architect-engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit three (3) hard copies of the SF-330 and one (1) Compact Disc (CD) to Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Code CON22, Attn: Stacy Harper-Mitchell, 6506 Hampton Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23508. Firms responding to this announcement by 2:00 PM Norfolk, VA local time, 22 January 2025 will be considered. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR

PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The Government will not accept responsibility for delays of any commercial carrier. The points of contact are either Stacy Harper-Mitchell, Contract Specialist, at stacy.l.harper-mitchell.civ@us.navy.mil or 757-322- 4667 or Kathleen Delashmitt, Contracting Officer, at kathleen.a.delashmitt.civ@us.navy.mil or 757-322-8332.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge or DBIDS badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA (Attachment C). The Commercial Vehicle Inspection location for vehicles coming to NAVFAC Atlantic on the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) is located at Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads at the Meredith Street gate off of Terminal Boulevard.

DBIDS passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Building #CD9 Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0700-1530 on Monday through Friday (Closed on Federal holidays)

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA. All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have or meet the requirements for a permanent DBIDS, CAC, Military or Military dependent ID badge who visit LRA or any installation in the Mid-Atlantic Region must complete and submit the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 (Attachment D) to NAVFAC LANT Security a minimum of 17 days prior to the proposed date of visit in order to allow security personnel ample time to process and submit requests.

Visitors must transmit the completed SECNAV FORM 5512/1 form which contains Privacy Act / PII data to NAVFAC Atlantic Security via the new (August 2019) DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) website found at the following link:

https://safe.apps.mil/

Please forward the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 via the DoD SAFE website to all of the NAVFAC LANT security personnel listed below:

Robert Hernandez / Email: robert.hernandez3@navy.mil Steven K. Anderson / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors can contact the NAVFAC Atlantic Security department at (757) 322-8116/8044/8115 if they have questions or need assistance.

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to Stacy Harper-Mitchell at stacy.l.harper-mitchell.civ@us.navy.mil and Kathleen Delashmitt at kathleen.a.delashmitt.civ@us.navy.mil.

References:

1. (CUI) DON SYSCOMs Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) Guide, dtd 4 Mar 2022

2. CNSS Directive 505 Supply Chain Risk Management

3. DoDD 3000.16, Vendor Threat Mitigation

4. DoDD 8000.01 Management of the Department of Defense Information Enterprise (DoD

IE)

5. DoDI 5200.44, Protection of Mission Critical Functions to Achieve Trusted Systems and

Networks

6. DoDI 5200.48 Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

7. DoDI 8010.01 DoD Information Network (DoDIN) Transport

8. DoDI 8100.02 Use of Commercial Wireless Devices

9. DoDI 8330.01 Interoperability of IT, including National Security Systems (NSS)

10. DoDI 8500.01 Cybersecurity

11. DoDI 8510.01, RMF for DoD Systems

12. DoDI 8551.01 Ports Protocols Service Management

13. DoDI 8582.01, Security of Non-DoD Information Systems Processing Unclassified

Nonpublic DoD Information

14. SECNAVINST 2400.1B, Electromagnetic Spectrum Policy and Management

15. SECNAVINST 3501.1D, Critical Infrastructure Protection Program

16. SECNAVINST 4855.20A, Counterfeit Materiel Prevention ASN RD&A, June 2017, Counterfeit Materiel Process Guidebook

17. SECNAVINST 5230.14 Information Technology (IT) Portfolio Management

18. SECNAVINST 5230.15 IT Policy for fielding Commercial Off the Shelf Software

19. SECNAVINST 5239.20A, DON Cyberspace IT and Cybersecurity Workforce

Management and Qualification

20. SECNAVINST 5239.3C DON Cybersecurity Policy

21. SECNAVINST 5400.15D, DON Research and Development, Acquisition, Associated

Life-Cycle Management, and Sustainment Responsibilities and Accountability

22. SECNAVINST 5510.30C DON Personnel Security Program

23. SECNAVINST 5510.36B Navy Information Security Program

24. (CUI) SECNAV Memo, 28 Sep 2018, Implementation of Enhanced Security Controls on

Select Defense Industrial Base Partner Networks

25. OPNAVINST 2060.8B, Base Telecommunications Services

26. OPNAVINST 5239.1D, U.S. Navy Cybersecurity Program

27. OPNAVINST 5530.14E, Navy Physical Security and Law Enforcement Program. Page

2-10, Restricted Areas