N6247024R0050 Synopsis Revised 8-6.pdf

N62470-24-R-0050 INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) ARCHITECT-

ENGINEER (AE) SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS LOCATED PRIMARILY IN THE MID-

ATLANTIC REGION OF THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES (CONUS) IN SUPPORT OF THE

SHIPYARD INFRASTRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM (SIOP) AND OTHER PROGRAMS

AT LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS

COMMAND (NAVFAC), ATLANTIC

Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A

STANDARD FORM SF-330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED

HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

Attachments: (a) Past Performance Questionnaire

(b) Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template

(c) LRA Commercial Vehicle Inspection Procedures

(d) SECNAV FORM 5512/1

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for projects that are Waterfront Facilities located throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Area of Operations but may also include work worldwide. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 U.S.C. Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term must not exceed $150,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000. Firm fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is March 2025.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330, Engineering Services. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study N62470-24-R-0050 conducted by NAVFAC Atlantic included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit this procurement on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition. The NAVFAC Atlantic small business office concurs with this decision.

The type of design and engineering services expected to be performed under this contract are primarily specific to the geology and construction methods of the Mid-Atlantic region and include, but are not limited to, the execution and delivery of Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation (DD Form 1391); 1391 Charrettes; Design Charrettes, Design-Build (DB) Request for Proposal (RFP);

Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Design contract documents; technical surveys and reports including concept and engineering studies, engineering modeling, site engineering investigations, topographic surveys, geotechnical investigations, hazardous material surveys, munitions of explosive concern (MEC) surveys, hydrographic surveys, and other surveys; construction cost estimates; Collateral Equipment (CEQ) Buy Packages; Comprehensive Interior Design (CID) including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E); Post Construction Award Services (PCAS), program management services, and criteria development and updates (United Facilities Criteria (UFC) and United Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) updates/consultation) for facilities located primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region of the CONUS. While not being evaluated on projects located outside of the region of interest, the contractor may also, on occasion, be tasked to provide services described herein to any NAVFAC

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS IN SUPPORT OF SIOP AND OTHER PROGRAMS AT LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC ATLANTIC

Command, any DOD activity, or other Federal agency activities in any geographic location worldwide.

All contractors are advised that a Unique Entity Identifier is required prior to award. Contract must complete the registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database by selecting “Entity Information”. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Web site (https://www.sam.gov) Entity Information section.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF-330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions or provide complete information may affect the Firm’s evaluation or disqualify the Firm from further consideration. Evaluation Criteria 1 through 3 are considered most important and are equal among themselves; Criteria 4 through 8 are of slightly less importance and are equal among themselves; and Criterion 9 is of the least importance and will be used as a tiebreaker among technically equal firms.

Specific selection criteria include:

1. Specialized Experience

2. Professional Qualifications

3. Past Performance

4. Quality Control

5. Program Management and Capacity

6. Sustainable Design

7. Commitment to Small Business

8. Firm Location

9. Volume of Work

Criterion (1) - Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in:

A. Execution of DD1391 or similar project programming documents B. Facilitating DD1391/design charrettes C. Development of DB Request for Proposal solicitation documentation D. Development of DBB design contract documents E. Waterfront and Shipyard engineering studies.

Relevant projects include new construction, repair or alteration of waterfront facilities such as dry docks, piers, wharves, and buildings that may include industrial facilities, maintenance and/or repair facilities, warehouses, buildings, and infrastructure. New construction projects shall be $75 million or more in construction value per project and completed within the past 10 years immediately preceding

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS the date of issuance of this notice. Repair/alteration projects shall be $20 million or more in construction value per project and completed within the past 10 years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice.

Firms may be considered more favorable by demonstrating the following:

Submission of more variety in the types of facilities completed to demonstrate recent specialized experience.

Projects located within the Mid-Atlantic region of the CONUS, particularly at any private or Navy-owned shipyard, with a preference toward Navy-owned shipyards.

Submission of large multi-discipline projects with construction value greater than $75 million.

Submission requirements: Provide a maximum of six (6) projects with the design completed within the past 10 years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrates the specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. For this Criterion, a complete design is one for which design drawings and specifications have been signed and sealed by the Registered Architect(s) and Professional Engineer(s). Sufficient information to determine the date of design completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. Each project example must not exceed two single-sided pages.

Within the maximum of six (6) relevant design projects, as defined above, firms shall demonstrate experience with design services of the following:

Two (2) designs minimum shall be for waterfront facilities (drydocks, piers, or wharves).

One (1) design minimum shall be for an industrial or major maintenance facility.

One (1) design minimum shall be for new construction of a type of facility listed above.

One (1) design minimum shall be for a full renovation project of a type of facility listed above that includes demolition.

One (1) design project for which the firm provided PCAS for the full performance period of a project’s construction. The project must have been designed by the firm and contain at least one of the similar types of facilities.

Firms must explicitly identify which project(s) satisfy this requirement. If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

The following information for each submitted project must be included for consideration:

Date of project design completion (Month and Year) – Section F Item 22. Professional Services

Project identified as constructed or not constructed. If construction was completed on or before the date of issuance of this notice, then provide date of construction completion (Month and Year); otherwise, state Construction Not Completed – Section F Item 22.

Construction (if applicable).

Project construction value (US dollars).

Project facility(s) size (SF or SM).

Project facility(s) respective primary function type.

Project facility(s) identified as new construction or renovation design.

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS

Design and PCAS projects must state if Design Bid Build (DBB) or Design Build (DB) procurement. Note: DBB will be considered more favorably.

Sufficient and concise information to determine the relevancy of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. If multiple function types exist in one project (i.e. multiple buildings), provide information identifying cost and size for each primary function type.

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract.

Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the Unique Entity Identifier number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name”. Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted;

however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, submit projects for each joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of four (4) projects for each partner and not to exceed a total of six (6) projects overall. Firms failing to provide projects from all joint venture partners will be considered to have not met the requirements of the criterion.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects.

Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or standalone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 1.

Criterion 2 - Professional Qualifications (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects as outlined in the SF330, Part 1, Section G. Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are Project Manager, Quality Control Manger, Architect, Civil Engineer, Landscape Architect, Structural

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS

Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Telecommunications Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Cost Engineer (Certified Cost Professional or equivalent), Interior Designer (practicing certified or registered), Fire Protection Engineer, and Environmental Engineer. All Engineers and Architects must be licensed in their respective disciplines. The Fire Protection Engineer must be a registered professional engineer who has passed the fire protection engineering written examination administered by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) and has relevant fire protection engineering experience. Other disciplines such as Planning and Scheduler Professional (PSP or equal) and Value Engineer (CVS or equivalent) are desired but not necessarily required.

Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one page each, single sided and should indicate: active U.S. professional registration (including registration/certification number), certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines, number of years of experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. Cite recent (within the past ten (10) years) project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract. Include any sustainable professional accreditation such as (but not limited to) LEED AP, Green Globes Professional, etc. Do not use other company titles such as “Type I Engineer” where the discipline and role are unidentifiable.

Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF-330, Part 1, Section G.

Criterion 3- Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction.

Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight.

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs must be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Atlantic, Code ACQ35, Attn: Ms. Stephanie Wray via email at stephanie.l.wray2.civ@us.navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 4- Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements:

Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract including checking documents for errors, omissions, completeness, inconsistencies, and quality; tracking and incorporating review comments; and implementing the latest criteria and lessons learned. Describe how the prime AE will ensure quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractor’s work is assured.

4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

Criterion 5- Program Management and Capacity (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, including the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time.

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS

1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

3. Primary Design Teams: Provide a list of key personnel for three (3) design teams consisting of different team members for each of the following roles: Project Manager (PM), Architect, Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Fire Protection Engineer, and Interior Designer (practicing registered or certified). For each team member, indicate by project number if they were a key member of any projects provided in Criterion 1 Section F. Provide resumes for these individuals in Criterion 2 Section E.

4. Specialized Project Management Experience: Provide a list of key Project Management personnel with specialized experience and technical competence in relevant projects that involved the execution of DD1391 or similar project programming documents, 1391/Design Charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, DBB design contract documents, and structural engineering studies.

More favorable consideration may be given for:

PM experience in (A), (B), and (C) of Criterion 1 PM professional qualifications and past performance of the prime or lead contractor’s key personnel vice subcontractor(s)’s key personnel Submission of more variety in specialized experience, and more variety of types of facilities.

Projects listed for Specialized Project Management Experience must meet the qualifications of Criterion 1 Specialized Experience and may be the same or different than the projects submitted under Section F. List no more than three projects for each of the three Project Managers. Each project listed for Specialized Project Management Experience shall include project title and location, year “professional services” (not including PCAS) completed, details of specialized experience, customer point-of-contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance, contract award amount, estimated construction cost and the role and experience the PM had in performing the project. Experience in a role other than PM for project submittal will not qualify as specialized experience and technical competence. If a project description does not clearly define the work performed by the PM (including the specialized design and engineering service) or if a project does not provide the requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers, that project may be evaluated less favorably or as not qualified.

Criterion 6 —Sustainable Design (SF330, Part I, Section H)

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS

Firms will be evaluated in terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integral design approach and designing in accordance with recognized sustainability rating systems such as Green Globe, LEED, etc.

Submission Requirements: Identify examples indicating design team (including consultants) experience and concepts employed, certification awarded, and accredited professionals proposed for this contract. For projects certified, submit a copy of the certificate (certificates are not included toward the overall page count).

Criterion 7 —Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which they have identified and committed to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement.

In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. In support of (A) Large Businesses (LBs) shall submit three (3) “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of comparable size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT they will not be considered.

The MOST RECENT reporting period is 31 March 2024 therefore, any ISR submitted that is not FINAL must be from the 31 March 2024 reporting period to be considered. Failure to provide three

(3) ISRs that comply with the requirements will result in a NOT MET for this criterion, unless ISRs for similar contracts of comparable size are not available. If ISRs for similar contracts of comparable size are not available, LBs shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of comparable size. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide a detailed explanation for each unmet goal.

In support of (A) Small Businesses (SBs) shall submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of comparable size.

In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command goals for FY2024 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals:

FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028

SB 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00%

HubZone 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%

SDB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

WOSB 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00%

SDVOSB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS

If a LB firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Subpart 19.7 and DFARS Subpart 219.7 will be required and incorporated into the contract award.

subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from SBs; however, in support of (B), SBs shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541330, Engineering Services, with a size standard $25,500,000.

The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment (B)) shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plan utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

Criterion 8—Firm Location (SF330, Part I, Section H)

Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily within 100 miles of Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, Virginia.

1. Indicate location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members.

2. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract. Address the ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support.

Criterion 9—Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD A&E contracts.

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF-330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11-point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed seventy-eight (78) single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the Firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart counts as one page and may be one single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11-point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Please include your Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330.

**In accordance with FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering. Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof may result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement will result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation. Joint Venture Firms shall not include Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC) in its name.

Architect-Engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit three (3) hard copies of the SF-330 and one (1) CD to Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Atlantic, Code: CON35 Attn: Stephanie Wray, 6506 Hampton Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23508. Firms responding to this announcement by 2:00 PM Norfolk, VA local time, 14 August 2024 will be considered. THIS IS

NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The Government will not be held responsible for delays of any commercial carrier. The points of contact are either Stephanie Wray, Contract Specialist, at stephanie.l.wray2.civ@us.navy.il or 757-322-8172 or Rebecca Douglas, Contracting Officer, at rebecca.v.douglas.civ@us.navy.mil or 757-322-4704.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected following LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA (Attachment C). The Commercial Vehicle Inspection location for vehicles coming to NAVFAC Atlantic on the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) is located at Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads at the Meredith Street gate off Terminal Boulevard.

N62470-24-R-0050 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION OF CONUS

DBIDS passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Building #CD9 Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0700-1530 Monday through Friday (Closed on Federal holidays)

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA. All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have or meet the requirements for a permanent DBIDS, CAC, Military or Military dependent ID badge who visit LRA or any installation in the Mid-Atlantic Region must complete and submit the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 (Attachment D) to NAVFAC LANT Security a minimum of 17 days prior to the proposed date of visit in order to allow security personnel ample time to process and submit requests.

Visitors must transmit the completed SECNAV FORM 5512/1 form which contains Privacy Act/PII data to NAVFAC Atlantic Security via the new (August 2019) DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) website found at the following link:

https://safe.apps.mil

Please forward the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 via DoD SAFE website to all three of the NAVFAC LANT security personnel listed below:

Robert Hernandez/ Email: robert.hernandez3@navy.mil Iris Gholston/ Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil Steven K. Anderson/ Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors can contact the NAVFAC Atlantic Security department at (757) 322-8116/8044/8115 if they have questions or need assistance.

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to Stephanie Wray, stephanie.l.wray2.civ@us.navy.mil.