Responses_to_Bidder_Questions_USS_Tortuga_(LSD-46)_SSRA_1-51__2.pdf

ITEM NO: 123-16-003

TITLE: Ballast Tank; repair

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO: 3 of 3

ITEM NO: 123-16-005

TITLE: Ballast Tank; repair

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO: 4-7 of 7

ITEM NO: J-1 Tortuga Work Spec Package

TITLE: Work Item index

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 123-21-004

TITLE: Accessible Void Repair

PARA. NO: 4.1

PAGE NO: 3 of 4

ITEM NO: 123-21-006

TITLE: Non-Floodable Void; repair

PARA. NO: 3.4, 4.1

PAGE NO 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 150-11-003

TITLE: Deck Repair; accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.7, 3.8, 3.9

PAGE NO: 2 of 3

ITEM NO: 262-90-001

TITLE: SCD 71079K, Main Propulsion Diesel

Engine (MPDE) Standby LO Pump (SLOP);

removal only

PARA. NO: 3.3, 3.3.1

PAGE NO: 2 of 2

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 5:

Paragraph 3.4 calls out 009-32, Table 4, Line 20 for the space listed in

1.2.1. Per Note 4.1, repairs in this work item are to be accomplished in conjunction with work item 123-21-002. Therefore, location 1.2.1 is also being preserved in 123-21-002 as location 1.2.7. Please clarify if the

Government is requesting two preservation cycles or if the preservation will be removed from one of the two work items.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Paragraph 3.4 has been deleted from

Work Item 123-21-006 via ERRATA Package #1. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel

Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 1:

This work item spec shows that there should be a total of three pages, but only pages one and two were provided. Although it appears that the work item spec is complete please confirm if this is a page numbering issue or if another page needs to be provided.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: There are only 2 pages to the Work

Spec, what was provided in the solicitation package is a complete Work

Spec.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 2:

This work item spec shows that there should be a total of seven pages, but only pages one through three were provided. Although it appears that the work item spec is complete please confirm if this is a page numbering issue or if other pages need to be provided.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: There are only 3 pages to the Work

Spec, what was provided in the solicitation package is a complete Work

Spec.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 3:

In attachment J-1 Tortuga Work Spec Package, the list of work items that runs from pages 4 through 6 includes a total of 119 work items. This list includes 14 work items that are not in Section C, nor were provided in the

Work Spec Package. Please either confirm that these 14 work items are not part of the solicitation or make appropriate changes to Section C and make the additional work item specs available.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The 14 Work Specs are not part of the

Work Spec package. These items are Cancelled and are NOT part of the solicitation package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work Item 123-21-007 was cancelled and removed from the Package prior to solicitation and will not be added at a later date. Yes, Note 4.1 was removed from the Work Item via ERRATA Package #1. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 4:

Note 4.1 states to work this item in conjunction with work item 123-21-

007. Work Item 123-21-007 is not in the package and the voids listed in 1.2 cannot be found in other work items. Will 123-21-007 be added at a later date or should Note 4.1 be removed?

REQUEST FOR SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATION

Attachment J-9

New Government Responses are indicated in BOLD.

DATE OF REQUEST: 19 April 2016 SOLICITATION NO: N50054-16-R-0005

TITLE: USS TORTUGA (LSD-46) Special Selected Restricted Availability (SSRA) MARMC POC: Trenel Armstrong

MARMC PHONE: 757-778-1720

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 7:

Paragraph 3.3.1 states to Ship the equipment to ensure arrival at the repair facility within 30 days after availability start date. For Bidding purposes where will the equipment be shipped?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The equipment will be turned over to the on-site Government Property Administrator.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 6:

Paragraphs 3.7 and 3.8 seem to be referencing different preservation methods for the same area. Also, paragraph 3.9 references preservation for new and disturbed, but there doesn't appear to be a direction on preservation of the underside of the new deck plates installed in 3.4.1 and 3.4.2. Please clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Preservation on the underside of the new deck plates are covered in Paragraph 3.9 via ERRATA Package #1.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

ITEM NO: 612-11-003

TITLE: Lifeline Assembly; replace

PARA. NO: 3.4

PAGE NO: 2 of 4

ITEM NO: 612-11-003

TITLE: Lifeline Assembly; replace

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 2 of 4

ITEM NO: 612-11-004

TITLE: Lifeline Stanchion; repair

PARA. NO: 3.5

PAGE NO: 2 of 2

ITEM NO: 612-11-005

TITLE: Lifeline Assembly; replace

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 612-11-006

TITLE: Lifeline Assembly; replace

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 612-11-007

TITLE: Lifeline Assembly; replace

PARA. NO: 3.2

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 612-11-008

TITLE: Lifeline Assembly; replace

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 3

ITEM NO: 644-80-003

TITLE: Troop Sanitary Space Habitability

Removal Project (HTRP-R9668);

accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.1.7, 3.2

PAGE NO: 2 of 3

ITEM NO: Solicitations

TITLE: Sources Sought

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: J-2

TITLE: Work Items

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: J-8

TITLE: labor and material burden worksheet

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 9:

This paragraph calls out to accomplish an SP-3 of stanchions, staples, and toggle pins. Will the Government consider replacing the toggle pins because any restriction in movement of a toggle pin usually is in the joint, an area that in inaccessible?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The LMA shall submit a CFR

(Condition Found Report) report for any material or equipment that does not function or needs to be replaced. PM will consider repair or replacement on a case by case basis.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 8:

Paragraph 3.4 calls out 009-32 Table 2, Line 8 for each stanchion and staple located in 1.2. This process is for non-skid. Is it the Government's intent to preserve the stanchions and staples with non-skid or will the Government change the coating system to a freeboard system keeping the SP-11 as the surface prep?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Para 3.4 has been revised via ERRATA

Package #1 to reflect 009-32, Table 2, Line 4, Columns A, B, C and G.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 17: This contractor did not receive the work specification pacakge until till after 3:00 PM on 3/2 other contractors received these files 2 days earlier puttinh this contractorat a timing disadvantage to the other potential prime contracts. We request a 2 day extension to allo us the minimum 30 day period for bid proposal development.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The proposal will not be extended.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 10:

This paragraph states to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 Table 2, Line 8 & Table 2, Line 44, which are both non-skid lines. Will the

Government clarify if non-skid systems, or parts, are to be used on stanchions and eyehooks as written in the work items? Will the Government consider using SP-11 and the Freeboard system?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Para 3.5 has been revised via ERRATA

Package #1 to reflect 009-32, Table 2, Line 4, Columns A, B, C and G.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 11:

This paragraph states to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 Table 2, Line 8 which is a non-Skid line. Will the government clarify if non-skid systems, or parts of it, are to be used on the stanchion and staple as written in the work item? Will the Government consider using SP-11 and the

Freeboard system?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Para 3.3 has been revised via ERRATA

Package #1 to reflect 009-32, Table 2, Line 4, Columns A, B, C and G.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Para 3.3 has been revised via ERRATA

Package #1 to reflect 009-32, Table 2, Line 4, Columns A, B, C and G.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 12:

This paragraph states to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 Table 2, Line 8 which is a non-skid line. Will the government clarify if non-skid systems, or parts of it, are to be used on the stanchion and staple as written in the work item? Will the Government consider using SP-11 and the

Freeboard system?

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 13

This paragraph states to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 Table 2, Line 8 which is a non-skid line. Will the Government clarify if non-skid systems, or parts of it, are to be used on the stanchion and staple as written in the work item? Will the Government consider using SP-11 and the

Freeboard system?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Para 3.2 has been revised via ERRATA

Package #1 to reflect 009-32, Table 2, Line 4, Columns A, B, C and G.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Para 3.3 has been revised via ERRATA

Package #1 to reflect 009-32, Table 2, Line 4, Columns A, B, C and G.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 15:

Paragraph 3.1.7 & 3.2 are duplicate paragraphs. Will the government remove 3.1.7 from the work item to avoid confusion?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Paragraph 3.1.7 has been deleted from the Work Item via ERRATA Package #1. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 14:

This paragraph states to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 Table 2, Line 8, Columns B, C and G for each stanchion and staple. A surface preparation column is not called out, and the called out preservation Table and Line is a non-skid system. Will the Government clarify the surface prep and coating system to apply?

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 16: Why did the government not do a sources sought for this solicitation there wre multiple qualified small businesses with the capability to execute this work in the Norfolk Area

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Sources sought is not required; however, market research was conducted in accordance with FAR Part 10.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 18: We have not received a copy of the J-8 please provide.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Attachment J-8 is posted on

FedBizOpps.

ITEM NO: 042-00-001

TITLE: Work Package Execution Review;

accomplish

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 123-16-005

TITLE: Ballast Tank

PARA. NO: 1.3.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 7

ITEM NO: 123-21-006

TITLE: Non-Floodable Void

PARA. NO: 3.4

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: Solication

TITLE:

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 243-11-002

TITLE: Main Propulsion Shaft Locking Device

PARA. NO: 1.2

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 150-11-005

TITLE: 06 Level Bridge Wing; repair

PARA. NO: 2.5

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 167-11-001

TITLE: Manhole Cover Stud; replace

PARA. NO: 2.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 3

ITEM NO: 514-90-001

TITLE: S/A LSD41-75214.01K, Chilled Water

Distribution System; removal only

PARA. NO: 2.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 4

ITEM NO: 514-90-001

TITLE: S/A LSD41-75214.01K, Chilled Water

Distribution System; removal only

PARA. NO: 2.5

PAGE NO: 1 of 4

ITEM NO: 524-11-001

TITLE: Auxiliary Sea Water Cooling System

Piping; replace

PARA. NO: 2.2

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 526-11-001

TITLE: Deck Drain Assembly; replace

PARA. NO: 2.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 28:

Ref. 2.2, 524-6101165 Rev D, Diagram Auxiliary Seawater Cooling System was not furnished to the contractor. Will the government be providing a copy of this drawing?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, the drawing has been provided.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 29:

Ref 2.3, 803-1385789 Rev H, Fitting, Deck Drain is called out in the spec item. However, Rev "G" was furnished to the contractor.

Will the correct revision be furnished to contractor or will the spec be revised to reflect Rev "G"?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The correct Revision is G, the Work

Spec has been corrected. See ERRATA 3. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 27:

Ref. 2.5, 321-8474317, SCD-5214.01 Power System Modification Air

Conditioning Plants Chilled Water Pumps was not furnished to the contractor. Will this drawing be made available?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, the drawing has been provided.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 26:

Ref 2.3, 302-758331, Standard Rise Installation Procedure Penetration

Install was not furnished to the contractor. Will this drawing be made available?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The correct drawing number is 302-

7583331, the Work Spec has been corrected and the drawing has been provided. See ERRATA 3. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 25:

Ref 2.3 is 805-1626726 Rev F, Flush W.T. & O.T. Bolted Plate Manhole 15

Inch x 23 Inch & 15 Inch x 18 Inch. However, the drawing furnished to the contractor as 1626726 is a General Electric drawing for Tubing. ill the correct drawing be furnished to contractor?

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 24:

The copy of Ref. 2.5, S9AA0-AB-GOS-010, General Specifications for

Overhaul of Surface Ships provided to contractors is Revision 5 of this document. However, the current revision of the GSO is Rev 7.

Will the government be providing a copy of Revision 7?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, Revision 7 has been provided.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, the correct drawing has been provided.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 21: Work in paragraph 3.4 is accomplished in item 123-21-002, paragraph 3.4, consider deleting para 3.4 from item 123-

21-006

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please see GOVERNMENT

RESPONSE in Bidders Question number 5.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 19: This work item requests the SOR be provided NLT A+25 this contradicts a Category 1 std item and requires the government to provide third part and AIT schedules which we have not received will the government provide those files in MS project?

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 22: CLIN 0002, Contract Data Requirement

List, number A013.

This CDRL, Block 4. DI-FNCL-80912 (Blk 16)

This document is not applicable to Firm Fixed Price contracts.

Recommend deleting this CDRL from the solication.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: CDRL A0013 is no longer required.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 23:

Under the Location of Work paragraph, there are two locations listed. 1.2.1 is for the Port Shaft Alley (6-98-2-E) and 1.2.2 is for the Starboard Shaft

Alley (6-98-2-E). Both locations show the same numerical designation, with the starboard side probably being incorrect. Most likely, the location should be (6-98-1-E) for the Starboard Shaft Alley. Please clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The correct spaces are as follow:

1.2.1 Port Shaft Alley (6-98-2-Q)

1.2.2 Starboard Shaft Alley (6-98-1-Q)

The work Spec has been corrected. See ERRATA 3. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel

Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 20: Looks like the length of the stiffener was left out, calls for 4 each, 5" x .025". Please provide stiffener length.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The SOR (Schedule Of Record) will be provided by A-0 in accordance with NSI 009-60. There are NO

AIT ShipAlt's, therefore NO POA&M' s will be provided to the

LMA. No, the Third Party Duration Analysis will NOT be provided to the LMA. See Errata 4 for changes. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel

Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Para 1.3.3 and 3.2.2 have been corrected via ERRATA Package #2. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

ITEM NO: 624-12-002

TITLE: Metal Joiner Door; repair

PARA. NO: 2.5

PAGE NO: 3 of 9

ITEM NO: 711-11-001

TITLE: MK38 Mod 2 Gun Foundation Mod;

accomplish

PARA. NO: 2.4

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 992-11-004

TITLE: Temporary Service; provide

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 644-80-003

TITLE: Troop Sanitary Space Habitability

Removal Project (HTRP-R9668);

accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.1.6

PAGE NO: 2 of 3

ITEM NO: 641-80-001

TITLE: Officer Stateroom Habitability Removal

Project (BOFF-R9662);

accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.1.6

PAGE NO: 2 of 3

ITEM NO: 643-80-002

TITLE: Crew Living Habitability Removal

Project (BENL-R9665);

PARA. NO: 3.1.5

PAGE NO: 2 of 2

ITEM NO: 643-80-003

TITLE: CPO Living Habitability Removal

Project (BCPO-R9663);

PARA. NO: 3.1.5

PAGE NO: 2 of 2

ITEM NO: 643-80-004

TITLE: Troop Living Habitability Removal

Project (BTRM-R9667);

PARA. NO: 3.1.5

PAGE NO: 2 of 2

ITEM NO: 643-80-005

TITLE: Berthing Habitability Removal Project

(BENL-R9642);

PARA. NO: 3.1.5

PAGE NO: 2 of 2

ITEM NO: 644-80-001

TITLE: Officer Sanitary Space Habitability

Removal Project (HOFF-R664); accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.1.6

PAGE NO: 2 of 3

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 38: Para. States to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 3, Line 8, Columns A and B for the deck of each compartment. Is it the intention to strip all existing decking in its entirety and apply primecoat? Or is the intention to strip decking and apply primecoat only for the areas of removals?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 39: Para. States to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 3, Line 8, Columns A and B for the deck of each compartment. Is it the intention to strip all existing decking in its entirety and apply primecoat? Or is the intention to strip decking and apply primecoat only for the areas of removals?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 35: Para. States to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 3, Line 8, Columns A and B for the deck of each compartment. Is it the intention to strip all existing decking in its entirety and apply primecoat? Or is the intention to strip decking and apply primecoat only for the areas of removals?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 36: Para. States to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 3, Line 8, Columns A and B for the deck of each compartment. Is it the intention to strip all existing decking in its entirety and apply primecoat? Or is the intention to strip decking and apply primecoat only for the areas of removals?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 37: Para. States to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 3, Line 8, Columns A and B for the deck of each compartment. Is it the intention to strip all existing decking in its entirety and apply primecoat? Or is the intention to strip decking and apply primecoat only for the areas of removals?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 33: Para. States to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 3, Line 8, Columns A and B for the deck of each compartment. Is it the intention to strip all existing decking in its entirety and apply primecoat? Or is the intention to strip decking and apply primecoat only for the areas of removals?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 34: Para. States to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 3, Line 8, Columns A and B for the deck of each compartment. Is it the intention to strip all existing decking in its entirety and apply primecoat? Or is the intention to strip decking and apply primecoat only for the areas of removals?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 31:

Ref. 2.4 LAR_Repair/LSDCL/MA12576, 06 Level MK38 Gun Foundation

Drainage Issue was not furnished to the contractor.

Will this drawing be made available?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, the LAR has been provided.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 32:

This work specification does not address ventilation requirements. To prevent delay and disruption which may be caused by extreme temperatures

(i.e., summer heat in unventilated ship), will the contractor be required to provide supply and exhaust ventilation and cooled air? If so, in order to provide this service, will the contractor be allowed to cut temporary access holes and/or tie into the existing ventilation system? Will a change to this work specification be forthcoming?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The correct Revision is A. The Work

Spec has been corrected. See ERRATA 3. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 30:

Ref 2.5 805-4629248 Rev A, Door, Joiner Metal Honeycomb Core is called out in the spec item. However, it appears the copy provided is Rev "-". Will the Rev A drawing be made available or will the spec item be modified to reflect the Rev "-" provided.

ITEM NO: 644-80-002

TITLE: Crew Sanitary Space Habitability

Removal Project (HENL-R9666); accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.1.6

PAGE NO: 2 of 3

ITEM NO: 150-11-005

TITLE: 06 Level Bridge Wing

PARA. NO: 3.5

PAGE NO: 2 of 2

ITEM NO: 589-11-002

TITLE: 60 Ton Crane Repair

PARA. NO: 3.2

PAGE NO: 1 of 7

ITEM NO: 589-11-002

TITLE: 60 Ton Crane Repair

PARA. NO: 3.15

PAGE NO: 6 of 7

ITEM NO: 589-11-002

TITLE: 60 Ton Crane Repair

PARA. NO: 3.16

PAGE NO: 6 of 7

ITEM NO: 589-11-001

TITLE: 20 Ton Topside Crane Repair

PARA. NO: 3.2

PAGE NO: 1 of 7

ITEM NO: 529-11-002

TITLE: Flooding and Drainage System Ballast

Valve; repair

PARA. NO: 1.2.11, 1.3.3

PAGE NO: 1, 2 of 6

ITEM NO: 529-11-002

TITLE: Flooding and Drainage System Ballast

Valve; repair

PARA. NO: 1.2.12, 1.3.3

PAGE NO: 1, 2, of 6

ITEM NO: 992-31-001

TITLE: Cleaning and Pumping; accomplish

PARA. NO: 1.2.47

PAGE NO: 2 of 12

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 44: Paragraph 3.15 states "Solvent clean lower level machinery house floor for equipment listed in 1.3.1. Accomplish the requirements of Surface Preparation Specification SSPC-SP-1 of 2.9."

3.16 states "Accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table

2, Lines 4, for equipment listed in 1.3.1, located at 1.2.1"

Is it the intention of the item to near white metal blast the entire crane, or should paragraph 3.16 be 3.15.1 for painting IAW 009-32, tbl 2, ln 4, column C & E of the lower level machinery room floor that was prepped in

3.15? Please Clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The Work Spec has been changed via Errata 4. Paragraph 3.15 has been changed to read

"Accomplish the requirements of Surface Preparation

Specification SSPC-SP-1 of 2.9 to solvent clean the lower level machinery house deck in its entirety, for equipment listed in 1.3.1."

Paragraph 3.16 has been changed to a "V" "G" checkpoint to verify cleanliness. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 45: Paragraph 3.2, directs the contractor to remove the Boom from the crane. There is no requirement to reinstall the

Boom. Is the Boom to be reinstalled during the SSRA or deferred to the

EDSRA.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, the boom will be reinstalled.

The Work Spec has been modified via Errata 4 to include

Paragraph 3.14 which states "Install the boom removed in 3.2 to the equipment listed in 1.3, in accordance with section 6.12.4.6 of

2.2.". Furthermore, paragraph 3.12 was deleted. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and

Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 41: Paragraph 3.5, other than exterior surfaces, no location of work is Id. Please provide sq. footage or more specify location of work

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work Spec has been changed via

Errata 4 to read "Accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 2, Lines One, 2, 3, or 4, for the exterior surfaces of those repaired in 3.1.1 through 3.1.4. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel

Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 42: Paragraph 3.2, directs the contractor to remove the Boom from the crane. There is no requirement to reinstall the

Boom. Is the Boom to be reinstalled during the SSRA or deferred to the

EDSRA.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, the boom will be reinstalled.

The Work Spec has been modified via Errata 4 to include

Paragraph 3.18 which states "Install the boom removed in 3.2 to the equipment listed in 1.3, in accordance with section 6.11.4.6 of

2.2.". See Errata 4 for the addition of paragraph 3.18. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and

Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 43: Paragraph 3.15, task contractor with surface preparation of lower level machinery house floor. Is there a coating requirement for this area?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The Work Spec has been changed via Errata 4. Paragraph 3.15 has been changed to read

"Accomplish the requirements of Surface Preparation

Specification SSPC-SP-1 of 2.9 to solvent clean the lower level machinery house deck in its entirety, for equipment listed in 1.3.1.

Paragraph 3.16 has been changed to a "V" "G" checkpoint to verify cleanliness. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 40: Para. States to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 3, Line 8, Columns A and B for the deck of each compartment. Is it the intention to strip all existing decking in its entirety and apply primecoat? Or is the intention to strip decking and apply primecoat only for the areas of removals?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 46:

In Paragraph 1.3.3 the Ballast drain valve FDS-V-3-122-1 is said to be connected to ballast tank 3-122-1-W. However, a tank does not exist at this location. Using Reference 2.2 and past history it appears that this tank is located at 3-121-1-W. If this location is changed, it is likely that work item

992-31-001, para 1.2.45 also needs to change.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The valve is located in tank 3-121-1-

W, it has been corrected via Errata 5. Furthermore, it is listed in location 1.2.30 of Work Spec 992-31-001. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel

Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 47: In Paragraph 1.3.3 the Ballast drain valve FDS-V-3-122-2 is said to be connected to ballast tank 3-122-2-W.

However, a tank does not exist at this location. Using Reference 2.2 and past history it appears that this tank is located at 3-121-2-W. If this location is changed, it is likely that work item 992-31-001, para 1.2.46 also needs to change.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The valve is located in tank 3-121-2-

W, it has been corrected via Errata 5. Furthermore, it is listed in location 1.2.31 of Work Spec 992-31-001. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel

Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 48: Paragraph 1.2.47, Salt Water Ballast

Tank (3-134-3-W) cannot be found in any of the provided references. Can the government verify 3-134-3-W exists and provide information on the size and location of this tank?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

ITEM NO: 992-31-001

TITLE: Cleaning and Pumping; accomplish

PARA. NO: 1.2.80

PAGE NO: 3 of 12

ITEM NO: 514-90-001

TITLE: S/A LSD41-75214.01K, Chilled Water

Distribution System;

removal only

PARA. NO: 2.5

PAGE NO. 1

ITEM NO: 624-12-002

TITLE: Metal Joiner Door; repair

PARA. NO: 2.5

PAGE NO: 3 of 9

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 49: Paragraph 1.2.80, JP-5 Stowage Tank (6-

99-0-J) cannot be found in any of the provided references. Can the government verify (6-99-0-J) exists and provide information on the size and location of this tank?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government Response is

Forthcoming.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 50: Request Government provide reference

321-8474317.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, drawing 321-8474317 has been provided. To receive the drawing, please send an email request to

Morgan Myrick and Trenel Armstrong at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 51:

The Government's response to question 30 indicated that the correct

Revision is A and that the work spec was corrected in ERRATA 3.

However, this item does not appear to have any changes in ERRATA 3. A copy of this reference with REV A in the title was included in the files received in conjunction with Amendment 2 and ERRATA 3, however the label inside the drawing shows it still to be REV '-' vice REV A. Please either forward the correct REV A drawing or change the work spec item to reflect the REV '-' sent to the contractor.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: There is currently no revision to this drawing, therefore the Rev was removed from the Work Spec.

This has been corrected via Errata 5. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Trenel

Armstrong at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.