N44255-13-R-8002_PPI_Log.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Waterfront Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N4425513R8002
About this file
N44255-13-R-8002 PPI Log
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Basic Contract
| Government PPI Number | PPI | Response |
| 1 | In addition to the BAVR information provided in the solicitation, the BAVR site also requires “Originating Command Security Officer Information”. Please also provide the appropriate contact information for these fields. | The Originating Command Security Officer Information section should be left blank. |
| 2 | Section 0100 describes the procedures for technical factors 1, 2, and 3 if the offeror is submitting as a Joint Venture or mentor-protegee. If our team is submitting as a prime contractor / sub-contractor relationship with a signed teaming agreement, will we be able to utilize our teaming partners past performance in our proposal? | The Government will not consider experience or past performance of a subcontractor. |
| 3 | Due to the down turn in Defense spending and with the paralleled reduction in available projects in the $7.5 million plus range, will the Navy, for the Purposes of this Proposal, reduce the Size requirement to $5 million and/or extend the range to projects completed within the last 10 years? | See Section Amendment 0001, Section 00100, Basis of Award, B. Evaluation Factors for Award(2)(b) Technical Factors, Factor 2 - Experience(1)(i) Construction Experience. |
| 4 | The Basis of Evaluation under Safety states that "Lower EMR's will be given greater weight in the evaluation" This type of evaluation does not translate to other RFP Basis of Award criteria which states that the 6 lowest price proposals determined to be technically acceptable will be selected for an IDIQ Contract. |
We would request that NAVFAC clarifies what is the technically acceptable and unacceptable criteria for each of 5 Technical Factors.
We believe that that NAVFAC is only interested in awarding contracts to contractors who continually promote, believe and execute their work with consistent safe work practices and results.
We would strongly suggest that the technically acceptable and unacceptable criteria be added for all factors but specifically Factor 4 Safety should be limited to a specific EMR and DART record such as: 2013 EMR Rate must be less than .65, The EMR rate from 2008 through 2013 must show an improving downward trend, and the average EMR Rate from 2008 through 2013 must be less than .70. 2013 DART Rate must be less than 1.00, and the average DART rate from 2008 through 2013 must be less than 1.00.
See Section Amendment 0001, Section 00100, Basis of Award, B. Evaluation Factors for Award(2)(b) Technical Factors, Factor 2 - Safety. In addition, technically acceptable and unacceptable criteria can be found in Section 00100, Basis of Award, B. Evaluation Factors for Award(2)(b) Technical Factors.
N44255-13-R-8002 PPI Log
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .