Amend_02_-_6813830.pdf

6714 Netherlands Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 • T: 910-686-9114 • F: 910-686-9666 • www.ecslimited.com ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Texas, LLP

January 5, 2015

Mr. John Ozmore DJG, Inc.

499 McLaws Circle Williamsburg, VA 23185

Reference: Report of Limited Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey MCAS Cherry Point – Building 4279

Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 22-21995

Dear Mr. Ozmore:

In accordance with ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) proposal number 22-19150 dated and authorized on December 4, 2014, ECS is pleased to submit this report of our asbestos and lead paint survey at the referenced site. This report includes a description of our understanding of the project background information, a description of the scope of work performed, including our findings, conclusions and comments.

PROJECT INFORMATION

The subject site is Building 4279 at the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point located in Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina. Building 4279 is a single story Television Production Center consisting of approximately 12,500 square feet. The building was reportedly constructed in 1990 and is slated for renovations. ECS was requested to conduct an asbestos and lead-based paint survey of the building. The project understanding is based on correspondence between Mr. John Ozmore with DJG, Inc. and Mr. Braxton Dawson with ECS.

PROCEDURE/METHODOLOGY

On December 15, 2014, ECS representative Mr. Braxton Dawson, (NC Accredited Asbestos Inspector No. 12830 and NC Accredited Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor No. 120251) visited the site to conduct the asbestos and lead paint survey. The weather conditions at the time of the site visits were approximately 55 degrees Fahrenheit and sunny.

Limited Asbestos Survey

ECS was requested to perform an asbestos survey of the subject property to identify (asbestos containing materials) ACMs which could be disturbed during demolition or renovation activities.

The EPA defines an ACM as a material containing greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos.

The National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires the identification of both friable materials (materials which can be pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry) and non-friable materials (materials which pose a hazard when sawn, sanded, drilled or pulverized) likely to become friable during demolition and/or renovation activities. NESHAP requires that the identified ACM be removed prior to initiating activities likely to disturb the ACM.

The survey consisted of observing the accessible areas of the site for the presence of suspect materials which may contain asbestos. Homogeneous materials (materials that were observed to

Report of Limited Asbestos and Lead Paint Survey MCAS Cherry Point – Building 4279 Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina ECS Project 22-21995 be similar based on material type, color, texture, etc.) were identified in various functional spaces during the survey.

In order to determine if the suspect materials observed during the visual survey contained asbestos, representative bulk samples were collected and placed in sealed plastic bags. EPA regulations require that multiple samples of each homogeneous area be collected for laboratory analysis. The samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical Inc. (EMSL) in Morrisville, North Carolina for analysis using the EPA recommended method of Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining (Method No. EPA 600/M4-020-82, Dec. 1982). EMSL participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). Their NVLAP accreditation number is 200671-0.

Limited Lead-Based Paint Survey The purpose of the lead inspection is to identify the general location of lead-based paint surfaces. This process consists of screening various painted surfaces based on color, substrate, phase of construction, etc. for the presence of lead-based paint. The role of the lead inspector is to determine and then report the presence of lead-based paint surfaces.

The lead-based paint inspection methodology follows general guidelines published by the EPA and OSHA. This process consists of screening painted surfaces (i.e. walls, ceilings, windows, window frames, doors, etc.) for lead-based paint. The lead-based paint inspection includes obtaining readings using a calibrated RMD LPA-1 XRF Lead-Based Paint Analyzer assigned to ECS. A reading was taken at each test location as listed in Attachment A. The State of North Carolina (State) defines lead-based paint as having “a lead content of 1.0 mg/cm2 of painted surface or greater than 0.5% lead.”

RESULTS

Limited Asbestos Survey

Some of the samples collected are considered multi-layered. These samples were comprised of more than one material, and each one is analyzed separately as per NESHAP requirements. If a sample of a material from a homogeneous area is found to be positive, then that material is considered positive, regardless of the results of the other samples of that material, within that area. Asbestos was not detected in the samples collected during ECS’s site visit. The data summary table (Attachment A) and asbestos figures (Attachment B) summarize the samples collected during ECS’ site visit. The bulk laboratory analysis results and chain of custody are included in Attachment D.

Limited Lead-Based Paint Survey

The data summary table (Attachment A) and lead figures (Attachment B) summarize the surfaces analyzed during ECS’ site visit. Site photographs are included in Attachment C.

Concentrations of lead in excess of or equal to EPA and State levels (1.0 mg/cm2) were detected on the following components:

Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina ECS Project 22-21995

The ceramic glazing on the white janitorial sink in the janitorial closet contains lead-based paint.

The ceramic glazing on the white sinks in the men’s and women’s heads contain lead-based paint. ECS observed one sink in each bathroom.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of analytical testing, asbestos was not detected in the samples obtained by ECS. In general, concentrations of lead in excess of or equal to EPA and State levels were detected on ceramic glazed sinks located in the male and female heads and the janitorial closet.

ECS recommends the following in regards to the building components containing lead-based paint being affected by the renovations:

1. Renovations to the materials should be done so that as little dust as possible is released.

2. Remove and replace if possible lead-containing components as identified by this report.

Additionally, the components may be covered with another substrate (wallboard, for example) to enclose the lead-based paint and reduce hazards.

3. Only qualified lead-based paint abatement contractors should perform lead-based paint abatement activities.

4. The following traditional methods of paint removal are unsafe if applied to old paint containing lead because these methods are known to poison children, occupants, and workers:

Open-flame burning or torching.

Machine sanding or grinding without a HEPA vacuum exhaust tool.

Uncontained hydro-blasting or high pressure washing.

Abrasive blasting or sand blasting.

Heat guns operating above 1,100 °F

If the lead-based paint containing materials are removed, they should be removed intact and shall be disposed of in the appropriate landfill, provided landfill waste profile requirements are complied with. Disposal must comply with the land disposal restriction notification requirements of 40 CFR 258.

This report summarizes our evaluation of the conditions observed at the site. The findings prepared by ECS are based upon testing performed in the buildings. ACM and lead-based paint may exist (undetected) in other areas due to their inaccessibility or due to the limited nature of our testing. Our recommendations are based on the guidelines presented in EPA, North Carolina, and OSHA asbestos and lead regulations. Please note that this document is not a specification for asbestos or lead removal. It does not contain means and methods for abatement. If you are planning an asbestos or lead abatement project, please contact ECS to discuss the requirements.

Use of this document without the express written consent of ECS is at the sole risk of the user and or/abatement contractor.

Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina ECS Project 22-21995

ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our asbestos and lead paint services for this project.

If you have questions or need additional information, please contact us at (910) 686-9114.

Respectfully, ECS CAROLINAS, LLP

Braxton B. Dawson Amy Conchas, REM Environmental Staff Scientist Environmental Principal

Attachments: A. Summary Tables B. Figures C. Photographs D. Laboratory Bulk Asbestos Analysis & Chain of Custody

Sample No. Material Description Sample Location Friable / Non- Friable Results

HA1-1 2'x4' Fissured Ceiling Tile Photo Lab Friable ND HA1-2 2'x4' Fissured Ceiling Tile Corridor Friable ND

HA2-1A Tan Cove Base Corridor Non-Friable ND HA2-2A Tan Cove Base Corridor Non-Friable ND HA2-1B Cove Base Mastic Corridor Non-Friable ND HA2-2B Cove Base Mastic Corridor Non-Friable ND HA3-1A Tan Floor Tile Lobby Non-Friable ND HA3-2A Tan Floor Tile Supply Non-Friable ND HA3-1B Floor Tile Mastic Lobby Non-Friable ND HA3-2B Floor Tile Mastic Supply Non-Friable ND HA4-1 12" Acoustical Wall Panels Studio Friable ND HA4-2 12" Acoustical Wall Panels Studio Friable ND HA5-1 Acoustical Wall Panel Mastic Studio Non-Friable ND HA5-2 Acoustical Wall Panel Mastic Studio Non-Friable ND

HA6-1A Stair Tread Studio Corridor Non-Friable ND HA6-2A Stair Tread Studio Corridor Non-Friable ND HA6-1B Stair Tread Mastic Studio Corridor Non-Friable ND HA6-2B Stair Tread Mastic Studio Corridor Non-Friable ND HA7-1 Drywall & Joint Compound (composite) Photo Lab Non-Friable ND HA7-2 Drywall & Joint Compound (composite) Conference Room Non-Friable ND HA7-3 Drywall & Joint Compound (composite) Changing Room Non-Friable ND HA8-1 Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI) Storage Non-Friable ND HA8-2 Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI) Mechanical Room Non-Friable ND HA8-3 Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI) Storage Non-Friable ND

ND = Not Detected Positive Stop = Not Analyzed Bold = Asbestos-Containing Material

TABLE 1

Summary of Asbestos Data

Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey MCAS Cherry Point - Building 4279

Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina

Number Location Component Substrate Color Result (mg/cm2)

1 Calibration N/A N/A N/A 1.0 2 Calibration N/A N/A N/A 1.0 3 Calibration N/A N/A N/A 1.0 4 Calibration N/A N/A N/A -0.2 5 Calibration N/A N/A N/A -0.1 6 Calibration N/A N/A N/A -0.2 7 Vestibule Door Frame Metal Black -0.2 8 Vestibule Door Metal Black -0.3 9 Vestibule Window Frame Metal Black -0.2

10 Vestibule Door Frame Metal Black -0.3 11 Vestibule Wall Concrete White -0.2 12 Lobby Door Frame Metal Blue -0.2 13 Lobby Upper Wall Concrete White -0.2 14 Lobby Lower Wall Concrete White -0.3 15 Photo Lab Door Frame Metal Blue -0.2 16 Photo Lab Wall Concrete White -0.2 17 Photo Lab Wall Drywall White -0.2 18 Changing Room Door Frame Metal Blue -0.2 19 Changing Room Wall Concrete White -0.2 20 Changing Room Wall Concrete White -0.1 21 Finishing Door Frame Metal Blue -0.2 22 Finishing Wall Concrete White -0.2 23 Finishing Wall Concrete White -0.2 24 Finishing Door Frame Metal Blue -0.1 25 Corridor Door Frame Metal Blue -0.3 26 Corridor Upper Wall Concrete White -0.2 27 Corridor Lower Wall Concrete White -0.2 28 Supply Door Frame Metal White -0.2 29 Supply Upper Wall Concrete White 0.0 30 Supply Lower Wall Concrete White -0.2 31 Video Door Frame Metal White -0.2 32 Video Upper Wall Concrete White -0.3 33 Video Lower Wall Concrete White -0.2 34 Conference Wall Drywall White -0.4 35 Conference Wall Drywall White -0.4 36 Conference Wall Drywall White -0.2 37 Conference Door Frame Metal Blue -0.1 38 Conference Door Frame Metal Blue -0.4 39 Conference Window Frame Metal Blue -0.4 40 Male Head Floor Tile Ceramic White -0.2 41 Male Head Wall Tile Ceramic White -0.1 42 Male Head Door Frame Metal Blue -0.1 43 Male Head Wall Drywall White -0.3 44 Male Head Ceiling Drywall White -0.2 45 Male Head Sink Ceramic White >9.9 46 Female Head Wall Tile Metal White -0.1 47 Female Head Door Frame Metal White -0.2 48 Female Head Wall Drywall White -0.3 49 Female Head Ceiling Metal White -0.2 50 Female Head Floor Tile Ceramic White -0.2 51 Female Head Sink Ceramic White >9.9 52 Janitorial Closet Floor tile Ceramic White -0.1 53 Janitorial Closet Wall Concrete White -0.4 54 Janitorial Closet Janitorial Sink Ceramic White >9.9 55 Corridor Door Frame Metal Black -0.2 56 Corridor Upper Wall Concrete White -0.2 57 Corridor Lower Wall Concrete White -0.2 58 Studio Wall Concrete White 0.1 59 Studio Wall Concrete White -0.1 60 Studio Door Frame Metal Blue 0.0

TABLE 2

Summary of XRF Lead Data

Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey MCAS Cherry Point - Building 4279

Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina

Number Location Component Substrate Color Result (mg/cm2)

TABLE 2

Summary of XRF Lead Data

Limited Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey MCAS Cherry Point - Building 4279

Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina

61 Studio Door Frame Metal Blue -0.1 62 Studio Window Frame Metal Blue -0.1 63 Storage Door Frame Metal Beige -0.2 64 Storage Upper Wall Concrete Beige -0.2 65 Storage Lower Wall Concrete White -0.1 66 Control Room Door Frame Drywall Green -0.1 67 Control Room Upper Wall Drywall Green -0.1 68 Control Room Lower Wall Metal Green 0.0 69 Studio Corridor Access Ladder Metal Brown -0.2 70 Studio Corridor Wall Concrete White 0.1 71 Print Office Wall Concrete White -0.1 72 Mechanical Room Door Frame Metal Brown -0.2 73 Mechanical Room Door Metal Brown 0.1 74 Calibrate N/A N/A N/A 1.0 75 Calibrate N/A N/A N/A 0.9 76 Calibrate N/A N/A N/A 1.0 77 Calibrate N/A N/A N/A -0.2 78 Calibrate N/A N/A N/A -0.1 79 Calibrate N/A N/A N/A -0.2

Bold = Lead-Based Paint

SO

U

R C

E

D

JG

, I N

C

N O

T

TO

S C

AL

E

A

SB

ES

TO

S

SA

M

PL

E

LO

C A

TI

O

N S

M C

AS

C

H

ER

R Y

PO

IN

T -B

U

IL

D

IN

G

H

AV

EL

O

C K, C R

AV

EN

C O

U N

TY

, N

O R

TH

C

AR

O

LI

N

A

EC

S

PR

O

JE

C T

N O

. 2 2-

H A1

-1

H A3

-1

H A1

-2

H A2

-1

H A3

-2

H A2

-2

H A6

-1

H A6

-2

H A8

-1

H A4

-1

H A4

-2

H A7

-2

H A7

-1

H A8

-2 Sa m pl e

Lo ca tio n

Sa m pl e

Po si tiv e

H A8

-3

H A7

-3

H A5

-2

H A5

-1

N eg at iv e

R ea di ng

Po si tiv e

R ea di ng

SO

U

R C

E

D

JG

, I N

C

N O

T

TO

S C

AL

E

LE

A

D -B

A

SE

D P

A

IN

T

LO

C A

TI

O

N S

M C

AS

C

H

ER

R Y

PO

IN

T -B

U

IL

D

IN

G

H

AV

EL

O

C K, C R

AV

EN

C O

U N

TY

, N

O R

TH

C

AR

O

LI

N

A

EC

S

PR

O

JE

C T

N O

. 2 2-

14 15

21 22

41 42

44 45

49 50

64 65

72 73

Limited Asbestos and Lead Paint Survey

Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 22-21995

Photograph No. 1 – View of the exterior of Building 4279.

Photograph No. 2 – View of the interior of Building 4279.

Limited Asbestos and Lead Paint Survey

Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 22-21995

Photograph No. 3 – View of the ceramic glazed sink in the janitor’s closet.

Photograph No. 4 – View of the typical ceramic glazed sink in the bathrooms.

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

2500 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 600, Morrisville, NC 27560 Phone/Fax: (919) 465-3900 / (919) 465-3950 http://www.EMSL.com raleighlab@emsl.com

291407702 CustomerID: ECS62 CustomerPO: 21995 ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Braxton Dawson ECS Carolinas, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive Wilmington, NC 28405

Received: 12/18/14 10:00 AM

Cherry Point, Building 4279

Fax: (910) 686-9666 Phone: (910) 686-9114

Project:

12/19/2014Analysis Date:

Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

HA1-1

291407702-0001

2'X4' Fissured Ceiling Tile

Tan/Beige None Detected Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose40% Min. Wool20%

Perlite20% Non-fibrous (other)20%

HA1-2

291407702-0002

2'X4' Fissured Ceiling Tile

White/Beige None Detected Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose40% Min. Wool20%

Perlite20% Non-fibrous (other)20%

HA2-1-Cove Base

291407702-0003

Tan Covebase & Mastic

Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

HA2-1-Mastic

291407702-0003A

Tan Covebase & Mastic

Tan None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose3% Non-fibrous (other)97%

HA2-2-Cove Base

291407702-0004

Tan Covebase & Mastic

Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

HA2-2-Mastic

291407702-0004A

Tan Covebase & Mastic

Tan None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose5% Non-fibrous (other)95%

HA3-1-Floor Tile

291407702-0005

Tan Floor Tile & Mastic

Beige None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose3% Non-fibrous (other)97%

HA3-1-Mastic

291407702-0005A

Tan Floor Tile & Mastic

Black None Detected Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose10% Non-fibrous (other)90%

1Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 12/19/2014 5:36:38 PM

Essie Spencer, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Morrisville, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200671-0, VA 3333 000278, WVA LT000296

Initial report from 12/19/2014 17:36:38

Essie Spencer (24)

Phone/Fax: (919) 465-3900 / (919) 465-3950 http://www.EMSL.com raleighlab@emsl.com

291407702 CustomerID: ECS62 CustomerPO: 21995 ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Braxton Dawson ECS Carolinas, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive Wilmington, NC 28405

Received: 12/18/14 10:00 AM

Cherry Point, Building 4279

Fax: (910) 686-9666 Phone: (910) 686-9114

Project:

12/19/2014Analysis Date:

Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

HA3-2-Floor Tile

291407702-0006

Tan Floor Tile & Mastic

Beige None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose2% Non-fibrous (other)98%

HA3-2-Mastic

291407702-0006A

Tan Floor Tile & Mastic

Black None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose8% Non-fibrous (other)92%

HA4-1

291407702-0007

12" Acoustical Wall Panels

Tan/White None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose40% Min. Wool20%

Perlite20% Non-fibrous (other)20%

HA4-2

291407702-0008

12" Acoustical Wall Panels

White/Beige None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose40% Min. Wool20%

Perlite20% Non-fibrous (other)20%

HA5-1

291407702-0009

Acoustical Wall Panels Mastic

Brown/White None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose4% Wollastonite2%

Non-fibrous (other)94%

HA5-2

291407702-0010

Acoustical Wall Panels Mastic

Brown/White None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose5% Wollastonite2%

Non-fibrous (other)93%

HA6-1-Stair Tread

291407702-0011

Brown Stair Tread & Mastic

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

HA6-1-Mastic

291407702-0011A

Brown Stair Tread & Mastic

Tan None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose3% Wollastonite2%

Non-fibrous (other)95%

2Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 12/19/2014 5:36:38 PM

Essie Spencer, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Morrisville, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200671-0, VA 3333 000278, WVA LT000296

Phone/Fax: (919) 465-3900 / (919) 465-3950 http://www.EMSL.com raleighlab@emsl.com

291407702 CustomerID: ECS62 CustomerPO: 21995 ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Braxton Dawson ECS Carolinas, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive Wilmington, NC 28405

Received: 12/18/14 10:00 AM

Cherry Point, Building 4279

Fax: (910) 686-9666 Phone: (910) 686-9114

Project:

12/19/2014Analysis Date:

Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

HA6-2-Stair Tread

291407702-0012

Brown Stair Tread & Mastic

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

HA6-2-Mastic

291407702-0012A

Brown Stair Tread & Mastic

Tan None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose2% Wollastonite2%

Non-fibrous (other)96%

HA7-1

291407702-0013

Drywall & Joint Compound (Composite)

Brown/Tan/White None Detected

This is a composite result of drywall, jt. compound, and tape, Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose20% Glass3% Wollastonite2%

Non-fibrous (other)75%

HA7-2

291407702-0014

Drywall & Joint Compound (Composite)

Brown/White None Detected

This is a composite result of drywall, jt. compound, and tape, Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose15% Wollastonite2% Glass5%

Non-fibrous (other)78%

HA7-3

291407702-0015

Drywall & Joint Compound (Composite)

Brown/Tan/White None Detected

This is a composite result of drywall, jt. compound, and tape, Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose20% Glass5% Wollastonite2%

Non-fibrous (other)73%

HA8-1

291407702-0016

TSI Brown/Tan None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose5% Glass25%

Non-fibrous (other)70%

HA8-2

291407702-0017

TSI Brown/White None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose15% Glass65%

Non-fibrous (other)20%

3Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 12/19/2014 5:36:38 PM

Essie Spencer, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Morrisville, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200671-0, VA 3333 000278, WVA LT000296

Phone/Fax: (919) 465-3900 / (919) 465-3950 http://www.EMSL.com raleighlab@emsl.com

291407702 CustomerID: ECS62 CustomerPO: 21995 ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Braxton Dawson ECS Carolinas, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive Wilmington, NC 28405

Received: 12/18/14 10:00 AM

Cherry Point, Building 4279

Fax: (910) 686-9666 Phone: (910) 686-9114

Project:

12/19/2014Analysis Date:

Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

HA8-3

291407702-0018

TSI Brown/White None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous

Cellulose10% Glass60%

Non-fibrous (other)30%

4THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 12/19/2014 5:36:38 PM

Essie Spencer, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Morrisville, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200671-0, VA 3333 000278, WVA LT000296

OrderID: 291407702

Repairs & Improvements Building 4279 Work Order #6876330 MCAS, Cherry Point, NC

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22

DESIGN, PROCUREMENT, AND INSTALLATION OF FURNITURE, FIXTURES, AND EQUIPMENT

02/15

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)

UFC 3-120-10 (2006; Change 1, 2007) Interior Design

1.2 SUBMITTALS

Government approval is required for submittals with a "G" designation;

submittals not having a "G" designation are for Contractor Quality Control approval. 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

SD-01 Submittals

Contractor's Interior Designer's Qualifications; G, ID

FF&E Schedule and Schedule Updates; G, ID

FF&E Concept Presentation Submittal / Over The Shoulder Review; G, ID

Best Value Determination Pricing Solicitation / Over The Shoulder Reivew; G, ID

Best Value Determination Recommendation FF&E; G, ID

Best Value Determination Recommendation A/V; G, ID

Preliminary (Pre-Final) FF&E Package; G, ID

Final FF&E Package; G, ID

Audio Visual Package; G, EE

Recommended Vendor FF&E Mock-Ups; G, ID

Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment Design Data; G, ID

1.3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Furnishings, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E) includes, but is not limited to items such as; systems and modular furniture, desks, workstations, seating, storage, filing, visual display items, accessories, artwork, training and conference furniture, soft window treatments, shop equipment, dorm and quarters furnishings and other miscellaneous items to support facility functions. Weapon racks, drying cages, and lockers are not typically considered FF&E. FF&E and A/V (if applicable) must be fully

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22 Page 1 integrated with the building systems and finishes. FF&E may also include specialty items for which the customer activity will be responsible for specifying.

The design and documentation of the FF&E and A/V (if applicable) must be funded as Interior Design Services and included in the Base Bid. The purchase and installation of the FF&E Package and A/V Package must be funded separately as the FF&E and A/V Planned Modifications. The Government FF&E estimates on the SECTION 00 22 13.00 20 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS to OFFERORS (Bid Schedule/Price Proposal Form) for the FF&E Planned Modification is $329,249.12 and does NOT include the Contractor's Handling and Administration Rate (HAR). This Government FF&E estimate must not be altered by Contractors during the bid process.

All FF&E items are subject to the Buy American Act or Trade Agreement Act, unless they are considered COTS (Consumer Off The Shelf) items.

1.4 INTERIOR DESIGN SERVICES OPTION

1.4.1 Contractor's Interior Designer's Qualifications

Per UFC 3-120-10, The Prime Contractor must provide the services of an Interior Designer with the following qualifications. The Prime Contractor's Interior Designer, must be certified by the National Council for Interior Design Qualification (NCIDQ), must have attained certification, registration or licensure and must have experience as the primary interior designer on projects of similar type, size, scope and complexity. Experience writing non-proprietary, technical performance criteria for competitive furniture bids and experience analyzing competitive furniture bid proposals, is required and must be clearly indicated in resume. The Prime Contractor's Interior Designer, Design Firm owners, and any Specialists must NOT have any affiliation or partnership with any furniture, fixture, or equipment products, any furniture dealership or manufacturers. Provide a detailed resume, client references and documentation of the Prime Contractor's Interior Designer's qualifications and significant interior design experience to the NAVFAC Interior Designer PRIOR to the Kick-off/Partnering Meeting. The Government will approve/disapprove the Prime Contractor's Interior Designer based on the provided documentation and past performance.

1.4.2 Concept FF&E package

A basic concept FF&E package, prepared by the A/E's Interior Designer, indicating the salient characteristics of all required FF&E and A/V items, will be provided to the Prime Contractor. The Prime Contractor's Interior Designer must further develop and revise this concept package, as required, to prepare/provide a final, best valued FF&E package, in accordance with the requirements in this document. The Prime Contractor must provide the Contractor's Interior Designer a complete set of the construction drawings (CAD files) prior to commencement of work on the project.

1.4.3 FF&E Schedule and Schedule Updates

For all projects, including fast track projects and renovations, the Prime Contractor is responsible for sufficiently scheduling all FF&E meetings and deliverables early enough to:

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22 Page 2

a. Obtain the required government approvals

b. Meet all FF&E ordering and installation lead times

c. Complete the FF&E installation by the contract completion date

All submittal due dates for the FF&E and A/V must be noted in the FF&E Schedule and reflected in the Prime Contractor's construction schedule. A proposed FF&E schedule for all FF&E Services and Deliverables must be provided to the Construction Manager, NAVFAC Interior Designer and Contracting Officer seven business days after the Interior Design Orientation Meeting. An FF&E Schedule Guideline template is available from the NAVFAC Interior Designer, for your use in developing a schedule.

Schedule updates must be submitted as the construction schedule is revised.

The Final FF&E package must be submitted four months prior to the funding deadline (to be determined by funding source) and approved no later than nine months prior to the Contract Completion Date.

1.4.4 FF&E and CEQ (Collateral Equipment) Services

The Contractor's Interior Designer and Equipment Specialists are responsible for developing equipment packages for FF&E and other specialty equipment, i.e. shop equipment, kitchen equipment, fitness equipment, laboratory equipment, medical equipment, high density storage, etc., required in the project. The Contractor must obtain the services of equipment specialists to provide design services and assist the Interior Designer with the development of non-proprietary performance criteria for the specialty equipment. Specialty equipment may require coordination with the Prime Contractor and subcontractors for connection of power, data, communications, waterlines, gases, etc. and calibration, testing and training prior to facility turnover and operation. The Equipment Specialist(s) must provide coordination of all necessary steps to provide a completely functional and operational facility.

The Prime Contractor's Interior Designer and Equipment Specialist(s) are required to meet with the Activity to discuss the function of each area, validate all FF&E, CEQ and specialty equipment requirements, make any necessary changes and additions to the Concept FF&E package and recommend any adjustments/revisions to the interior building finishes and building infrastructure. The FF&E/CEQ effort includes the design, selection, specification, color coordination, procurement documentation and installation coordination of the equipment items necessary to meet the functional, operational, sustainability, and aesthetic needs of the facility. The FF&E/CEQ packages must be fully integrated with the design, construction, and schedule of all building finishes and all building systems (HVAC, Plumbing, Fire Protection, Communications, Electrical, Data, Architecture, etc.)

All electrical, data and communications outlets, switches, fire extinguishers, thermostats, sprinkler heads, etc. must be accommodated and be fully accessible once equipment is installed. ABA clearances must be accommodated. The Contractor's Interior Designer must work with the Prime Contractor and the electrical and telecommunication subcontractors to coordinate all infrastructure with the Recommended vendors. Dimensioned locations on plans and elevations for Multi-user Telecommunications Outlet Assemblies (MUTOAs), junction boxes, wall outlets and floor boxes, must be determined and provided by Contractor's Interior Designer, based on the

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22 Page 3 sizes, layouts and configurations of the equipment items to be provided.

See Section 1.5.9 Subsection g. If infrastructure planned for the building, such as power/data/communications requirements, must be revised to support the FF&E package, those revisions and coordination are the responsibility of the Contractor's Interior Designer and the Prime Contractor.

The FF&E plans must take into consideration any/all Collateral Equipment (CEQ) to include specialty equipment, existing and future Government-Furnished, Government Installed (GFGI) equipment and Government-Furnished, Contractor-Installed Equipment (GFCI). These items may include, but are not limited to: multi-function devices, printers, shredders, safes, vending machines, etc.

a. The Contractor's Interior Designer is responsible for incorporating new and existing CEQ into the FF&E plans.

b. The Activity will supply the Contractor's Interior Designer with a complete list of all existing and new CEQ, to include sizes, utility requirements, weight, etc., to be relocated or used in the new facility.

The Contractor's Interior Designer is responsible for incorporating this equipment into the FF&E plan.

These are minimum requirements and the Prime Contractor must be prepared to provide any/all additional meetings and submittals that may be necessary to support the Interior Design effort and FF&E coordination.

The Contractor's Interior Designer and equipment specialists are responsible for developing competitive and biddable Request for Proposal packages, with comprehensive, non-proprietary, technical performance criteria, as directed by the NAVFAC Interior Designer. Equipment must be biddable by at least three providers and the technical performance criteria must be based on product available through NAVSUP Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA's), GSA schedules, and other Federal contracts, in compliance with priorities found in FAR Part 8.404, when possible. If NAVSUP BPA/GSA vendors do not have access to the required equipment, research to find appropriate specialty equipment vendors may be required.

Utilization of NAVFAC-provided templates is required for all Best Value Determination efforts and deliverables. The utilization of the current NAVSUP BPA list is required for BVD Analysis Request for Pricing. The current NAVSUP BPA (vendor) list and NAVFAC standard templates are available at:

http://www.wbdg.org/ffc/navy-navfac/collateral-equipment

MIDLANT specific templates will be provided by the NAVFAC Interior Designer.

1.4.4.1 Audio Visual (A/V) Services

When A/V equipment is required, a Certified Technology Specialist-Design (CTS-D) whose certification is ANSI accredited is required for the design and preparation of A/V packages. The Equipment Specialist(s) must provide separate Best Value Determinations (BVDs) for all categories of specialty equipment, if required by NAVFAC. If NAVSUP BPA/GSA vendors do not have access to the required equipment, research to find appropriate specialty equipment vendors may be required. The final equipment packages must be in accordance with the general interior design requirements in UFC

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22 Page 4

3-120-10, and as required for all areas as determined during the client FF&E and A/V programming.

The A/V package must be prepared by the Contractor's ID and A/V Certified Technology Specialist-Design (CTS-D) as a separate package. If an A/V or specialty equipment package is required, the design, procurement, and installation of the package must comply with all of the same requirements as those defined for the FF&E package in this specification section.

Additionally, A/V floor plans and elevations must be provided, indicating equipment locations and A/V riser diagrams for all A/V systems, and to coordinate equipment locations and power requirements with power plans and FF&E locations. The A/V and specialty packages must be fully integrated into the design, construction, and schedule of all building finishes and all building systems (HVAC, Plumbing, Fire Protection, Communications, Electrical, Data, Architecture, etc.) All outlets, switches, thermostats, fire extinguishers, etc. must be fully accessible once all equipment is installed. All sprinkler heads, fire extinguishers, ABA clearances, etc.

must be accommodated.

1.5 FF&E MEETINGS, PRESENTATIONS AND SUBMITTALS

The Prime Contractor's Interior Designer and the NAVFAC Interior Designer must attend all meetings, site visits and walk-throughs, as required, obtain end-user and NAVFAC approvals and provide a complete and functional FF&E package. No mock-ups will be required for this project. All meetings must be coordinated with advance notice to the NAVFAC Interior Designer, so that schedule and travel can be coordinated.

Each submittal must demonstrate thorough interaction with the Activity's functional requirements and complete coordination with the facility design and the Structural Interior Design (SID).

1.5.1 Interior Design Orientation Meeting

This meeting shall occur at NAVFAC MIDLANT, located in Norfolk, VA within 7 days of Pre-Construction/Kick-Off meeting, unless Contractor's Interior Designer approval is pending. The NAVFAC Interior Designer will review the following with the Prime Contractor and the Contractor's Interior Designer: Schedule Development, Concept FF&E package, Best Value Determination (BVD) NAVFAC templates and process, Number of Best Value Determinations required, and Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPAs), GSA or other mandatory sources to consider. A proposed preliminary schedule for the FF&E Meetings and Submitals must be submitted to the NAVFAC Interior Designer within 7 business days of this meeting. A final decision on the number of Best Value Determinations required may be dependent on the Prime Contractor's construction schedule and phasing.A minimum of three BVD's will be required for this project.

1.5.2 FF&E Concept Presentation Submittal and "Over the Shoulder" Review

Prior to the FF&E Concept Presentation to the Activity/End User, the Contractor's Interior Designer must present the FF&E Concept to the NAVFAC Interior Designer. If the Contractor's Interior Designer is remotely located, they can submit one hard copy of the presentation to the NAVFAC Interior Designer and schedule a follow-up discussion to review the presentation. If the Contractor's Interior Designer is local to the

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22 Page 5

Norfolk, VA area, a meeting is required. The submittal can be presented in a "loose" format or binder (no presentation boards required) for NAVFAC approval prior to the Activity presentation. Catalog cut sheets and visuals from various manufacturers for each major FF&E item must be provided, along with cut sheets depicting commonly available options. Cut sheets should be clearly labeled with the item numbers used in the Concept FF&E package and FF&E plans. Information on durability and availability of finishes should be readily available for discussion. Fabric and finishes should not be discussed, except in terms of durability. The "over-the-shoulder" review meeting will be held at NAVFAC, located in Norfolk, VA or via conference call.

1.5.3 FF&E Concept Presentation to the Activity

After implementing all feedback from the NAVFAC FF&E Concept Presentation, the Prime Contractor's Interior Designer must present the NAVFAC approved Preliminary (Pre-final) FF&E package to the Activity, at a location determined by the Prime Contractor's ID and NAVFAC ID, for feedback and approval. This meeting must include a walk-through of the Activity's existing facility(s) or similar facility. During this meeting, a detailed, functional review of the entire project must occur, with the proposed FF&E presentation to follow, to ensure that all current FF&E requirements have been captured. The presentation must include catalog cut sheets and visuals from various manufacturers for each major FF&E item, along with cut sheets depicting commonly available options. Cut sheets should be clearly labeled with the item numbers used in the FF&E plans. FF&E Presentation boards are not required. Minutes of this meeting with photos of the approved FF&E concept must be submitted to the NAVFAC Interior Designer within 7 business days.

1.5.4 Best Value Determination(BVD)Pricing Solicitation "Over the Shoulder Review"

After implementing all feedback from the FF&E Concept Presentation to the Activity, the Prime Contractor's Interior Designer will prepare a pricing solicitation package, using the provided NAVFAC templates, for use in soliciting FF&E pricing and determining a best value vendor. The Prime Contractor's Interior Designer must submit one electronic copy of the BVD Analysis Request for Pricing Cover Letter (live WORD document), one printed hard copy, in binder format, of the entire pricing solicitation package, and one book-marked, pdf format, electronic copy of the entire pricing solicitation package to the NAVFAC Interior Designer for an "over-the-shoulder" review. This submittal should be in the final, edited format that will be sent to the NAVSUP BPA vendor list. If the Prime Contractor intends to attach an example of their subcontract agreement to the package, a copy of the subcontract agreement must be included in this submittal. This submittal must be approved by NAVFAC prior to requesting pricing.

BVD Pricing Solicitation must include the following;

a. BVD Analysis Request for Pricing cover letter:

The NAVFAC Cover Letter template must be used and highlighted areas must be edited, as required for the specific project. The electronic version of this submittal must include a "live" WORD document of the letter with all revisions indicated by "tracked changes". Information to clarify the scope can be added to the

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22 Page 6

NAVFAC template provided; but no information should be deleted from the template without discussion with the NAVFAC Interior Designer.

(1) The Contractor's Interior Designer must coordinate a proposed FF&E "hold pricing" timeframe, up to 12 months, with the Prime Contractor, based on the construction schedule. The "hold pricing" timeframe must be requested in the BVD Analysis Request for Pricing cover letter. If a known price increase is expected, and vendor pricing cannot be held for the "hold pricing" timeframe requested, then the proposed vendor pricing must reflect the anticipated price increase(s). All anticipated price increases during the "pricing hold" period must be funded in the FF&E planned modification. Manufacturer's documentation on the GSA price increase(s) and effective dates must be provided to NAVFAC.

b. BVD Analysis Request for Pricing Spreadsheet/Questionnaire:

Item numbers must be updated to reflect all required FF&E items and tagged to coordinate with updated FF&E Plans. Spreadsheet info must include: Item Tag #, Basic Item Name/Brief Description, Basis of Design Manufacturer Name/Series/Product #, and a representative photo. Clear references to the applicable performance criteria should be provided below each item description.

c. Performance Criteria:

Non-proprietary, technical, performance criteria must be created for each FF&E item, or each item category, to establish minimum acceptable FF&E requirements. Adequate level of detail must be provided so that comparable and competitive pricing can be obtained from at least three NAVSUP BPA vendors. Criteria must clearly reference the applicable FF&E item tags on the BVD Analysis Request for Pricing Spreadsheet and FF&E plans.

(1) Project Specific Workstation/Desk Typicals:

Typicals for each item are required to include: a description, dimensioned plans with power, data and grommet locations, detailed elevations and isometric views, as necessary to communicate the desired layout. Typicals must clearly reference the applicable FF&E item tags on the BVD Analysis Request for Pricing Spreadsheet and FF&E plans.

d. Updated FF&E Plans:

FF&E Plans must be transferred to the Contractor's Interior Designer's title block with a legend coded to the updated FF&E item numbers used on the BVD Analysis Request for Pricing Spreadsheet. All Collateral equipment (CEQ), to include Audio Visual equipment, Government Furnished, Government Installed (GFGI) equipment such as printers and vending machines and Government Furnished, Contractor Installed (GFCI) equipment, must be indicated on drawings for coordination purposes.

e. Vendor Mock-Up Requirements:

Requirements, expectations and proposed schedule(s) for mock-ups should be outlined in the BVD Pricing Solicitation. If there is not adequate time in the schedule for mock-ups, the recommended vendor should be prepared to provide detailed 3-D renderings, prior to placing orders, to insure that the Activity is comfortable with the work station/desk design and layout.

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22 Page 7

1.5.5 BVD Analysis FF&E Mock-Up

No mock-ups will be required for this project.

1.5.6 BVD Vendor Recommendation and "Over the Shoulder Review"

The Prime Contractor's Interior Designer must submit one hard copy and one book-marked PDF copy of this submittal to the NAVFAC Interior Designer.

Book-marked PDF copies must also be sent to the NAVFAC Construction Manager, the NAVFAC Contracting Officer, IDD/Base Property for Marine Corps Projects.

The Prime Contractor's Interior Designer must schedule an "Over the Shoulder" review conference call to review the results of the BPA Pricing Solicitation and discuss the best value vendor recommendation. The NAVFAC Contracting Officer must provide verbal approval of the NAVSUP BPA vendor recommendation during this call. If clarifications, updates or revisions are required, documentation must be revised and resubmitted. This submittal should include the following:

a. Binder Cover Page/Spine Identification (Project name, Project #, Location, Submittal date, Submittal title)

b. BVD Analysis Request for Pricing Spreadsheets/Questionnaires, as submitted by the three highest rated NAVSUP BPA vendors.

c. Documentation showing that all required NAVSUP BPA sources, including UNICOR, in the appropriate SIN category were contacted (copy of the email solicitation).

d. Bid Response from UNICOR, if received.

e. Completed BVD Analysis Pricing Evaluation Spreadsheet, comparing ALL vendor pricing and responses in a side-by-side format. This spreadsheet must highlight proposed items that do not meet the required performance criteria, indicate specific proposal shortcomings, indicate the recommended BPA vendor, and highlight key factors supporting the best value NAVSUP BPA vendor recommendation. Open Market items and items that do not comply with the Buy America Act or Trade Agreement Act, must be indicated.

f. Back-up information submitted by each bidder. (cut sheets/highlighted pricing sheets/technical specifications, pricing, dealer and manufactuere qualificaitoins for each product showing that product meets all requirements). Provide in cd format and include in the binder for the NAVFAC Interior Designer.

g. A comprehensive written statement outlining the evaluation of each vendor's proposal and the key factors supporting the best value NAVSUP BPA vendor recommendation.

1.5.7 Vendor Recommendation Letter and De-Briefs

Following the approval of the NAVSUP BPA vendor recommendation, the Contractor's Interior Designer must send out notification to the NAVSUP BPA

SECTION 01 30 01.00 22 Page 8 vendors who submitted pricing proposals and provide de-briefs to vendors, if requested. Templates for these notification letters and guidance for a standard de-brief will be provided by the NAVFAC Interior Designer.

1.5.8 Recommended Vendor FF&E Mock-Up

No mock-ups will be required for this project.

1.5.9 Preliminary FF&E Submittal

Once the best value vendor recommendation has been made, the Prime Contractor's Interior Designer must work in conjunction with the recommended vendor to develop the FF&E package that will be procured for the project. This package must be presented to the Activity and NAVFAC in loose format at a meeting to occur at NAVFAC, located in Cherry Point, NC.

Recommended FF&E finish and fabric samples for all major FF&E items should also be presented with large samples of the building interior finishes available for reference.