Amendment_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

DESIGN BUILD P-791, SMALL ARMS TESTING AND EVALUATION CENTER (SATEC) RANGE EXPANSION JEB LITTLE CREEK-FORT STORY, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA

Please see continuation page

Phase 1 proposal due date of February 21, 2018 remains unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Feb-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008518R1101

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Jan-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Feb-2018

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

HAMPTON ROADS IPT

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008518R1101

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 02

This amendment is being issued to provide the following:

Revise Estimated Cost of Construction from $20,003,000 to $21.8M Revise design experience Responses to PPIs

Proposal due date of February 21 , 2018 at 2:00pm remains unchanged.

Section SF30 Block 14 Continuation Page, Section 00100- Bidding Schedule/ Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

E. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Factor 2 – Experience has changed from

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(3) Design Experience

Submit a minimum of two (2) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: A project totaling 20,000 square feet or more.

Scope/Complexity: Design of new construction of a multi-story concrete structure(s) or facility(ies).

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be must have been completed within seven (7) years prior to the date of proposal submission.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction, specialized experience, or design experience; submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction, specialized experience, design experience. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined for design experience..

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor as the Designer of Record in order to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction, specialized experience, and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction, two projects for specialized experience, and five projects for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience, two (2) for Specialized Experience, and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may receive a higher rating than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may receive a higher rating than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate using blast-rated concrete may receive a higher rating

Relevant projects that demonstrate construction of an urban tactical training facility with multiple buildings for live firing range may receive a higher rating.

To the following

(3) Design Experience

Submit a minimum of two (2) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: A project totaling 20,000 square feet or more.

Scope/Complexity: Design of new construction of a multi-story concrete structure(s) or facility(ies).

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be must have been completed within seven (7) years prior to the date of proposal submission. For design- build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within seven (7) years prior to the date of proposal submission. The design completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C).

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction, specialized experience, or design experience; submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction, specialized experience, design experience. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined for design experience..

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor as the Designer of Record in order to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction, specialized experience, and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction, two projects for specialized experience, and five projects for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience, two (2) for Specialized Experience, and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may receive a higher rating than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may receive a higher rating than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate using blast-rated concrete may receive a higher rating

Relevant projects that demonstrate construction of an urban tactical training facility with multiple buildings for live firing range may receive a higher rating

PPI Responses are below:

PPI #

(AQ)

Reference Question

(AQ)

Government Response

(AQ/PM/DM/DOR)

Page/Dwg

(AQ)

Section (AQ) Paragraph (AQ)

1 11 of 65 N/A N/A

Factor 2 – Experience, (2) Specialized Experience – Set Design/Installation requires that projects submitted shall have been completed within seven (7) years. Given the distinctive size/scope/complexity of this required specialized experience, would the Government please consider extending the range from seven (7) to ten (10) years?

Bid per RFP

3 10 Factor 2-

Experience

(i) (1) Construction

Experience

Will the Government consider as relevant a 2-story CMU structure with a hardened veneer?

Bid per RFP

4 10 Factor 2-

Experience

(i) (1) Construction Experience

Will the Government accept Renovation projects if they meet the size, scope and complexity requirements?

5 13-14 of 65

Section 00100, E.

Evaluation Factors for Award, Factor

3: Past Performance

If the Offeror has a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ-0) on file previously completed by the Client that matches all fields of the required Attachment D, may this be submitted in lieu of requesting a new PPQ specific to this solicitation?

Bid per RFP, see page 3 of Attachment D

6 13-14 of 65

Section 00100, E.

Evaluation Factors for Award, Factor

3: Past Performance

Factor 3 - Past Performance requests inclusion of CPARS evaluations.

Please confirm: If the Offeror was both the Prime Contractor and Designer of Record on a project (and was not issued a separate AE CPARS/ACASS evaluating the DOR effort), may the same CPARS/CCASS be provided for both Construction and Design Experience – or – is it preferred that a PPQ evaluating solely Design performance be provided?

Bid per RFP

7 7 of 65

Section 00100, E.

Evaluation Factors for Award, 3.

Basis of

Evaluation and Submittal

Requirements for Each Factor, (a)

Price: (1) Solicitation Submittal

Requirements

N/A

Please confirm that the items listed under (a) Price, (1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements, which includes (i) – (vi), the Executed SF1442, Completed Price Proposal Form, SAM Reps & Certs, Bid Bond, VETS-4212 Registration, and the Responsibility Determination Information items are to be submitted in the Price Proposal required in Phase Two, not in the Phase One submission.

If any of these items should be included in the Phase One submission, please advise.

1 of the solicitation.

8 11 of 65

Section 00100, Factor 2 -

Experience, (2) Specialized Experience

N/A

Factor 2 – Experience, (2) Specialized Experience requests submittal of projects for the Offeror. Is it intended or acceptable for 1 of the 2 Specialized Experience projects to be presented for the Primary Design Firm? Please clarify.

11 of the solicitation.

9 12 of 65

Section 00100, Factor 2 -

Experience, (3) Design Experience

N/A

Factor 2 – Experience, (3) Design Experience states that projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within seven (7) years prior to the date of proposal submission. Please clarify completion for projects submitted for the Primary Design Firm. For design-build projects, may the design portion of the contract have been completed within seven (7) years? Standard NAVFAC definition of 100% Complete for design projects is 100% plans and specifications signed off by an Architect-Engineer and ready for construction with final cost estimate.

See Amendment 0002

10 11 Specialized

Experience-Set Design/Installation

Size/Scope/Complexity

Can the government please verify if they are requiring a computer operated environment inside of a building for the 3D training or is the government requiring an outside environment similar to an Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT).

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required performance has changed from DESIGN-BUILD P-791 SMALL ARMS TESTING AND EVALUATION CENTER (SATEC) RANGE EXPANSION, JEB LITTLE CREEK – FORT STORY, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIATHIS RFP IS FOR PHASE I FACTORS 1-3 ONLY. OFFERORS WHO ARE SELECTED

FOR PHASE II WILL BE NOTIFIED.COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS: FULL AND OPEN

COMPETITIONPROCUREMENT METHOD: CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATIONSOURCE SELECTION

PROCESS: BEST VALUE TRADE-OFF, TWO-PHASETYPE OF CONTRACT: FIRM FIXED

PRICEMAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION: $10,000,000 - $25,000,000ESTIMATED COST OF

CONSTRUCTION: $20,003,000NAICS CODE: 236220; SIZE STANDARD: 36.5M; FEDERAL SUPPLY CODE:

YIAZALL PRE PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPI's) MUST BE MADE IN WRITING AND EMAILED TO barbara.williamson-g@navy.mil NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE.All Requests for Proposal documents and Amendments will be posted to the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website at https://www.neco.navy.mil. Potential Offerors will not be contacted regarding any changes posted. to DESIGN-BUILD P-791 SMALL ARMS TESTING AND EVALUATION CENTER (SATEC) RANGE EXPANSION, JEB LITTLE CREEK – FORT STORY, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIATHIS RFP IS

FOR PHASE I FACTORS 1-3 ONLY. OFFERORS WHO ARE SELECTED FOR PHASE II WILL BE

NOTIFIED.COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITIONPROCUREMENT

METHOD: CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATIONSOURCE SELECTION PROCESS: BEST VALUE TRADE-

OFF, TWO-PHASETYPE OF CONTRACT: FIRM FIXED PRICEMAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION:

$10,000,000 - $25,000,000ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $21.8MNAICS CODE: 236220; SIZE STANDARD: 36.5M; FEDERAL SUPPLY CODE: YIAZALL PRE PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPI's) MUST BE MADE IN WRITING AND EMAILED TO barbara.williamson-g@navy.mil NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE.All Requests for Proposal documents and Amendments will be posted to the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website at https://www.neco.navy.mil. Potential Offerors will not be contacted regarding any changes posted..

(End of Summary of Changes)