N4008313R3112_SOLICITATION_BOILER_TUBE_B11.pdf

ACQR3317036

Boiler Tube Replacement at Building 11 - NAICS: 238220; FSC: Z2NB

It is the intent and objective of the Government to acquire a Small Business contractor for w ork to replace boiler tubes at Building 11, Naval Station Great Lakes, Great Lakes, IL w hich includes providing all labor, transportation, supervision, materials and equipment (unless specif ied otherw ise) associated w ith replacing boiler tubes w ithin HRSG#2 at Building 11. Future w ork may include HRSG #1 & Boiler #4 in addition to any other repairs on boilers or HRSGs.

SITE VISIT: Scheduled for Wednesday, August 21, 2013 at 10am. Meet at 2625 Ray Street, Buildiing 2016 for pre-proposal conference.

Offerors MUST RSVP no later than August 13, 2013 by 12noon CST. In order to be considered for aw ard, quoters MUST attend the site visit.

See Instructions to Offerors for information.

RFIs DUE: No later than Friday, August 23, 2013 by 12:00pm CST. See Instructions to Offerors for information.

PROPOSAL DUE DATE: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 no later than 2:00pm CST. See Instructions to Offerors for information.

PATRICIA B. BORJA 847-688-5395

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

08-Aug-2013

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______14 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______30 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC MIDWEST PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

PWD GREAT LAKES FEAD/2625 RAY ST, B.2016

GREAT LAKES IL 60088

N40083

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

(hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

847-688-3689FAX:TEL: 847-688-5395 TEL: FAX:

N40083-13-R-3112 102

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

BOILER TUBE REPLACEMENT, BUILDING 11 RFP# 3317036

Great Lakes Naval Base

Revised 19 July 2011 3

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 Dollars, U.S.

HRSG #2 - BOILER TUBE REPLACEMENT

FFP

Repairs on HRSG #2 to include up to 5 tube replacements. Furnish all labor, transportation, supervision, materials and equipment (unless specified otherwise) associated with maintaining the water tubes withing HRSG #2 to include up to 5 tube replacements.

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: ACQR3317036

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0002 50,000 Dollars, U.S.

IQ FOR FUTURE REPAIRS ON HRSGs & BOILER

FFP

Furnish all labor, transportation, supervision, materials and equipment (unless specified otherwise) associated with maintaining the water tubes within HRSGs #1 & #2 and Boilers.

MAX

Revised 19 July 2011 4

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

EXHIBIT LINE ITEM

FFP

PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHEMENT A WHICH INCLUDES EXHIBITS A, B,

& C FOR LINE ITEM PRICING (ATTACHED)

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

$1,000.00 $50,000.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

Revised 19 July 2011 5

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government 0002 Destination Government Destination Government 9000 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

0001 365 dys. ADC NAVFAC MIDWEST PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

PATRICIA ANN BORJA

PWD GREAT LAKES FEAD/2625 RAY ST,

B.2016

GREAT LAKES IL 60088

(847) 688-5395 X247

N40083

0002 365 dys. ADC 50,000 (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

9000 365 dys. ADC (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 PRICE WORKSHEET 08-AUG-2013 Attachment C SAFETY 08-AUG-2013 Attachment D QUALITY CONTROL 08-AUG-2013 Attachment E HRSG TUBE SECTIONS 08-AUG-2013

Revised 19 July 2011 6

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Replace Boiler Tubes on HRSGs #1 & #2 & Boiler #4 at Building11, Naval Station Great Lakes, Illinois

1. POINT OF CONTACT

Ms. Patti Borja, Contract Specialist Phone: (847) 688‐5395 extension 247 Fax: (847) 688‐3689 Email: patti.borja@navy.mil

2. STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW): All work shall be accomplished in accordance with the attached Request for Proposal (RFP).

3. PRE‐PROPOSAL CONFERENCE & SITE VISIT

A pre‐proposal conference will be held:

DATE: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 TIME: 10:00a.m.

PLACE: Building 2016

2625 Ray Street Great Lakes, IL 60088

Following the pre‐proposal conference, a site visit to Building 11 will be conducted. Pre‐ proposal Conference & Site Visit Questions shall be directed to the above mentioned Point of Contact (patti.borja@navy.mil).

Due to restricted access to the base, offerors are required to RSVP (using the Base Access Form

– Attachment 2) to Patti Borja at patti.borja@navy.mil and cc Aaron Brncich at Aaron.Brncich@navy.mil. Please include full names of site visit attendees on the base access form (Attachment 2) no later than August 13, 2013 at 12:00 pm Central Time. Offerors must RSVP to attend the site visit. In order to be considered for award, quoters must attend the site visit.

Offerors should be properly attired for conducting a site visit in an inside environment with appropriate safety gear for inspecting proposed areas. Due to security restrictions, photographs of work areas affected by this RFP will need prior approval and no work stations or Government personnel are to be photographed at any time.

NSGLINST 5530.1 INSTALLATION ACCESS FOR CONTRACTORS AND VENDORS:

In order to access Great Lakes Naval Base, offerors shall contact the new Navy Commercial Access control System (NCACS – formally known as RAPIDGate), at info@rapidgate.com.

Revised 19 July 2011 7

Enrollment and cost information may be obtained by contacting RAPIDGATE at http://www.rapidgate.com/vendors/how‐to‐enroll, or calling 1‐877‐727‐4342. Offerors should be properly prepared for conducting a site visit, with appropriate safety gear available for inspecting the proposed work areas. Photographs of work areas are permitted so long as no other areas or Government personnel are photographed, due to security considerations.

4. SOLICITATION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFIs): Questions regarding the specifications, drawings, and solicitation documentation (Solicitation RFIs) must be submitted no later than Friday, August 23, 2013 by 12:00pm Central Standard Time. RFIs must be submitted on Attachment (3) via email to patti.borja@navy.mil.

5. PROPOSAL DUE DATE & SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS: Technical and Price Proposals are due no later than Tuesday, September 3, 2013 no later than 2:00 p.m. CST. Offerors shall provide four (04) copies of their Technical Proposal and two (02) copies of their Price Proposal, including any amendments. Electronic submission of proposals will NOT be accepted. Hard‐copy originals as required by this RFP should be mailed to:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Midwest ATTN: Ms. Patti Borja, Contract Specialist 2625 Ray Street, Building 2016 Great Lakes, IL 60088‐3147

Hand‐delivered should be brought directly to Building 2016, 2625 Ray Street, Naval Station Great Lakes, IL.

6. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: Period of Performance for this contract will be one (01) year after date of award. In accordance with FAR 52.211‐12, Liquidated Damages (LDs) in the amount of $80.00 will be assessed for every calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

7. DAVIS‐BACON ACT & DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (DoL) WAGE DETERMATION(S): In accordance with FAR 22.407 (clause 52.222‐6, Davis‐Bacon Act) Department of Labor General Decision Number IL130008 posted on 07/26/2013 for construction work. If this wage determination is updated by the Department of Labor (DoL) prior to award of this Contract, the most current wage determinations will be incorporated into the award.

8. ESTIMATED COST RANGE: The estimated cost range for this project is between $40,000 and $60,000.

9. ELECTRONIC INVOICING: This Task Order will require use of the Department of Defense (DoD) Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) system for the submission of invoices In Accordance With DFAR CLAUSE 252.232‐7006.

Revised 19 July 2011 8

10. BONDING: A bid guarantee is not required with proposals. However, Performance and Payment bonds are required after award In Accordance With (IAW) FAR 52.228‐15.

11. PROPOSAL EVALUATION: Proposal evaluation will be based on providing the best value to the government using the Low Price, Technically Acceptable Source Selection Approach (FAR 15.101‐2). Price, Non‐Price Technical Factors and Past Performance will be the considerations. See Item #12 (Evaluation Factors) for additional information on evaluation factors. All Non‐price Factors and Past Performance are equal to each other, and when combined, are approximately equal to price.

12. EVALUATION FACTORS:

a. PRICE: Offerors shall provide two (2 ) copies of their Price Proposals including any amendments and Attachment 1: Price Worksheet.

Offer Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall enter the total price for the Proposal for the

Boiler Tube Replacements at Building 11 based on the Request for Proposal for the project, Solicitation# 3317036, Statement of work, and drawings for Building 11 in accordance with the price worksheet at Attachment 1 in this Request for Proposal.

Basis of Evaluation

The Budget Amount for this project is $40,000 to $60,000. The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for Contract Line Items (CLINs) 0001 and 0002.

Proposals that provide prices greater than the Budget Amount may be rejected.

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(a) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(b) Comparison of proposed prices with the Government Estimate (GE).

(c) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

b. NON‐PRICE AND PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FACTORS

The Proposed Task Order will be awarded to the responsible Offeror offering the best value to the Government using Low‐Price, technically acceptable best value continuum. To make a determination of Best Value, the Government shall evaluate each offeror on the following criteria:

FACTOR 1 – Experience – Boiler Repair FACTOR 2 – Past Performance FACTOR 3 – Safety

Revised 19 July 2011 9

Factor 1 – Experience – Boiler Repair

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(a) Boiler Repair Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (03) to a maximum of five (5) Boiler Repair projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the solicitation. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as water tube replacement performed on superheated high‐pressure steam power boilers that operate at a minimum of 350 psig and whose output is no less than 50,000 pounds per hour of steam.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this solicitation.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract.

For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is

MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded;

however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double‐sided page (or two (2) single‐sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this solicitation (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green

Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture partners may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

Revised 19 July 2011 10

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The

Offeror must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. More weight may be given to the Offeror’s projects than to those submitted for subcontractors.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design.

Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

Factor 2: Past Performance

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 for construction experience. If a completed AE Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 for design experience. If there is not a completed CCASS or ACASS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 1 for Construction Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow‐up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Patti Borja, via email at patti.borja@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date.

Revised 19 July 2011 11

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double‐sided pages (or four (4) single‐sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. More emphasis will be placed on more relevant projects. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the

Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of

Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information

System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the

Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the SOLICITATION.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive an Unknown Confidence rating.

FACTOR 3 ‐ SAFETY

(a) Offeror’s Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each Contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

Revised 19 July 2011 12

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

For the three (3) (2010, 2011, 2012) previous complete calendar years, submit your EMR (which compares your company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums over a three (3) year period). If you have no EMR, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

For the three (3) (2010, 2011, 2012) previous complete calendar years, submit your OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, as defined by the U.S.

Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, any and innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), and other related databases.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

‐ Experience Modification Rate (EMR) ‐ OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate ‐ Offeror Technical Approach to Safety ‐ Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

The Government will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating

Revised 19 July 2011 13 circumstances that impact the rating. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART Rate to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety:

The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

13. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range (if applicable); and to award to the offeror submitting the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) proposal.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the SSA determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition range can be conducted, the SSA may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a technical and price standpoint.

3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

4. An overall non‐price factors rating must be “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in overall non‐price factors rating being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An

Revised 19 July 2011 14 overall non‐price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

Revised 19 July 2011 15

ATTACHMENT 1

PRICE WORKSHEET

SEE ELIN SCHEDULE ON ATTACHED EXCEL WORKBOOK (3 SHEETS)

Revised 19 July 2011 16

ATTACHMENT 2

NSGL BASE ACCESS APPLICATION

SECTION 1 – Sponsor Information.

LAST NAME FIRST

NAME

SPONSOR

AUTHORITY

COMMAND WORK

PHONE

HOME

PHONE

TYPE OF

ACCESS

BRNCICH AARON

SECTION 2 ‐ Visit Information

COMPANY NAME VISIT START DATE VISIT END DATE PUSPOSE OF VISIT

Unescorted Destination or

Event Location

Event or Activity Name Access Gate Time of Event

SECTION 3 – Visitor/Contractor Information

DATE FIRST

NAME

LAST NAME MI SSN DOB SEX ADDRESS DL # STATE

Revised 19 July 2011 17

ATTACHMENT 3

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Question No.

Reference (Sect/Para/

Page)

QUESTION

GOVERNMENT

RESPONSE

Gov't use - Amend #

Revised 19 July 2011 18

ATTACHMENT A

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project No. (check one) : CON #1 CON #2 CON #3 CON #4 CON #5

1. Experience for: Offeror Joint-Venture Other (Explain)

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:

Title:

Location:

4. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

5. Type of work:

New Construction Renovation Repair Alteration Other (explain):

6. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Firm-Fixed Price Cost/Time and Material Other (explain):

Complete Block 7 for Construction Projects. Complete Block 8 for Design Projects.

7. Construction Project:

Award Amount: Final Price:

Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Design-Build Design-Bid-Build Delivery/Task Order (IDIQ) Other (explain):

If Design-Build, identify the Lead Design Firm:______________________________________________

Revised 19 July 2011 19

8. Design Project:

A/E Design Fee: Total Construction Value:

Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Design-Build RFP Development Designer of Record Engineering Services Full Plans & Specs

Other (explain):

9. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, square footage, construction methods), including any sustainable features or USGBC LEED certifications. If design-build, include a description of the design-effort.

10. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this project:

11. Other Information:

Revised 19 July 2011 20

ATTACHMENT B – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

1. The NAVFAC Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

2. Offerors should submit the PPQ with their offer. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment B1), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow‐up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Patti Borja via email at patti.borja@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date.

3. Offerors should provide PPQs with their proposal as required by the RFP. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation."

Revised 19 July 2011 21

ATTACHMENT B1 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

NAVFAC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Award Amount:

Final Price:

Revised 19 July 2011 22

4. Project Description:

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed:

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND

SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE

HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER,

QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE

OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO

VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

N40083-13-R-3112

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control

E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel

E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns

E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems?

If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

SCOPE OF WORK

Bldg 11 Boiler Tube Replacement Contract Great Lakes, IL, 60088

Statement of Work – Bldg 11 Boiler Tube Replacement Contract

1. General Description:

This work includes furnishing all labor, transportation, supervision, materials and equipment (unless specified otherwise) associated with maintaining the water tubes within HRSGs #1 and #2 due to the historical trend of annual failures of 3-5 tubes per HRSG. Water tube maintenance for Boiler #4 will be required as well, but on an as needed basis since its failures are far less common. Typically there has only been one or two tube failures each year at most, if at all.

2. Location:

The work shall be performed inside and around HRSGs #1 and #2 and Boiler #4 in Building 11, located on Ziegemeier St. at Naval Station Great Lakes.

3. Time for Completion and Duration of Contract:

Immediate tube replacement work is required for HRSG #2 and possibly HRSG #1. The Contractor shall be on site and have performed hydrostatic testing on both HRSGs to determine the extent of work required as soon as possible following the award of the contract but no later than 10 calendar days.

Future tube replacement requirements will be met on an on-call basis and the Contractor shall be on site and have performed hydrostatic testing on the leaking boiler/HRSG(s) no later than 5 calendar days after notification that work is required during the term of this contract, of which said term shall be one (1) year.

In all cases, the Contractor shall begin repairs immediately following hydrostatic testing. Task/delivery orders shall be issued depending on the amount of work required in the future or if the initial repairs exceed the original expectations of the Government.

4. Examination of the Premises:

Contractor shall reference FAR Part 52.236-3, Site Investigation, and Conditions Affecting the Work.

Site visits by quoters are encouraged and can be arranged by contacting the Contracting Office.

5. Inspection and Approval:

All material and workmanship shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the Government.

6. Minimum Insurance Requirements:

The contractor shall procure and maintain during the entire period of performance under this contract the following minimum insurance coverage:

a. Comprehensive general liability: $500,000 per occurrence.

b. Automobile liability: $200,000 per person; $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury; and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage.

c. Workmen's compensation: As required by Federal and State workers' compensation and occupational disease laws.

d. Employer's liability coverage: $100,000 except in States where workers' compensation may not be written by private carriers.

e. Others as required by State law.

Before commencing work under this contract, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing that the required insurance has been obtained. The policies evidencing required insurance shall contain an endorsement to the effect that any cancellation or any material change adversely affecting the Government’s interest shall not be effective-

(1) For such period as the laws of the State in which this contract is to be performed prescribe; or

(2) Until 30 days after the insurer or the Contractor gives written notice to the Contracting Officer, whichever period is longer.

7. Submittals:

The Contractor shall submit four (4) copies of the contract submittals required before and after award of the purchase order. All submittals shall be approved by the Government Representative prior to the start of work. Contractor can submit submittals electronically via email if the type of submittal allows it. For example, floor tile samples obviously could not be sent electronically. All Material Safety Data Sheets shall be supplied to the Government Representative.

A. Required Pre-Award Submittals:

1. Boiler Inspector’s NBBI and State of Illinois Current and Valid Certificates of Authorization

2. Contractor’s NBBI “R” Current and Valid Certificate of Authorization (Boiler Repair).

3. Installation Technician’s (Welder’s) Qualifications

4. Contractor’s ASME “PP” Current and Valid Certificate (Power Piping)

B. Required Post-Award Submittals:

1. Administrative submittals

i. Insurance (see paragraph 6)

ii. Accident Prevention Plan (see safety specification)

iii. Safety Plan – See Section 13

iv. Payment Bond

v. Asbestos Abatement Plan

8. Quality Control:

Maintain quality control for and inspect all work under the contract. The DOR, as a member of the Contractor QC organization, shall remain directly involved during the construction process. For this project, the Quality Control Manager, Superintendent, and Site Safety and Health Officer may be combined.

a. Submit a QC Plan for Government review and acceptance. The QC plan shall include the following:

1) NAMES, QUALIFICATIONS and RESPONSIBILITIES: For each person in the QC organization (design and construction).

2) OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS: Outside organizations, including architectural and consulting engineering firms and a description of the services these firms will provide.

3) INITIAL SUBMITTAL REGISTER (DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION): Include submittal reviewer, estimated date of delivery, and identify which design submittals require Government approval prior to construction, and which construction submittals require DOR or Government approval prior to construction.

4) TESTING LABORATORIES: Accredited laboratories as applicable.

5) TESTING PLAN AND LOG: Tests required, referenced by specification paragraph number requiring the test, frequency, and person responsible for each test.

6) LIST OF DEFINABLE FEATURES: A Definable Feature of Work (DFOW) is a task, which is separate and distinct from other tasks, and has the same control requirements and work crews.

7) COMMUNICATION PLAN: Provide a plan for key decisions and possible problems the Contractor and Government may encounter during the design phase of the project. Communication Plan shall indicate the frequency of design meetings and what information is covered in those meetings, key design decision points tied to the Network Analysis Schedule and how the DOR plans to include the Government in those decisions, peer review procedures, interdisciplinary coordination, design review procedures, and comment resolution.

b. QC Manager Responsibilities:

1) Participate in the Post Award Kick-off, Partnering, Design Development and Coordination Meetings and Production Meetings.

2) Ensure that no construction begins before the DOR has signed and stamped the design for that segment of work, and design and construction submittals are approved as required in Attachment A and the QC Plan.

3) Immediately stop any work that does not comply with contract plans and specifications, and direct the removal and replacement of any defective work.

4) Prepare QC Reports.

5) Hold biweekly QC meetings with DOR, Superintendent and Government technical team; participation shall be suitable for the phase of work.

6) Ensure that safety inspections are performed. Attend weekly Toolbox meetings.

7) Maintain submittal log.

8) Maintain updated as-built drawings on site.

9) Maintain testing plan and log. Ensure that all testing is performed per contract.

10) Maintain deficiency log on site, noting dates deficiency identified, and date corrected.

11) Certify and sign statement on each invoice that all work to be paid under the invoice has been completed in accordance with contract requirements.

12) Perform Punch-out and Pre-final inspections, and participate in Final Inspections.

Establish list of deficiencies; correct prior to the Final inspection.

13) Ensure that all required keys, operation and maintenance manuals, warranty certificates, and the As-built drawings are submitted to the Contracting Officer.

c. Use the Three Phases of Control process for construction QC.

1) Preparatory Phase: Review all applicable documents for compliance with all applicable laws, codes, regulations, and the requirements of the contract,…