NSA Annapolis Energy RFP Appendix B.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N40080RFP10985
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that is part of the proposal process for a Department of the Navy contract opportunity regarding the development of renewable energy generation at the former Naval Academy Dairy Farm in Annapolis, Maryland. The questionnaire requests the contractor's client to provide an assessment of the contractor's past performance, including their ability to meet requirements, complete projects in a timely manner, and deliver quality work. The client is asked to rate the contractor's performance on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory across several criteria. The completed questionnaire must be submitted directly to the contractor's point of contact on company letterhead by the specified deadline. This Past Performance Questionnaire is Appendix B to the overall Request for Proposals (RFP) for the renewable energy generation project at the former Dairy Farm, which is a Department of the Navy contract opportunity with Solicitation Number N40080RFP10985.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the Department of the Navy, Real Estate Business Line. As part of our proposal, we have listed you (Client) as a reference on our performance (Offeror/Contractor). Your input is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to:
OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR Info:
Company:
Name & Title:
Phone:
Email:
Questionnaire is due to Offeror/Contractor POC no later than ___________________________, 2024. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the POC on company letterhead.
Thank you.
ALL INFO BELOW THIS LINE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CLIENT.
CLIENT Info
PRIMARY CONTACT:
Company:
Name & Title:
(Please only list persons who are available to be contacted by the Department of the Navy.)
Phone:
E-Mail:
ALTERNATE CONTACT:
Company:
Name & Title:
(Please only list persons who are available to be contacted by the Department of the Navy.)
Phone:
E-Mail:
Contact Info of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Company:
Name & Title:
(Please only list persons who are available to be contacted by the Department of the Navy.)
Phone:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number:
2. Contract Value:
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items/services provided:
5. Has Contractor fulfilled its obligations under the contract provisions?
6. Would you work with the Contractor again if you had another project?
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Comments, if any.
Questions 2. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to complete the project in a timely manner? Did the Contractor provide and meet a project timeline?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Question 3. Quality of Project
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of project (including design, build, delivery etc) and the overall quality of the project?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Question 4. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
RFP N40080-24-RP-00062/LO-10985
APPENDIX B
RFP N40080-24-RP-00062/LO-10985
APPENDIX B
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .