AMENDMENT 0002 - PAVING IDIQ.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SOLICITATION: N40080-21-R-7608 - INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) FOR PAVING FOR FACILITIES WITHIN THE NAVFAC

WASHINGTON AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY

PLEASE SEE SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-May-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008021R7608

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

21-Apr-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-May-2021

CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYS COMMAND

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008021R7608

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

As an amendment to the solicitation, the following is hereby incorporated:

1. Provide RFI Responses

2. Attachments

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. RFI RESPONSES:

1. Solicitation Page 9 – “Responsibility Determination”: The information required in this section is not listed in the solicitation submittal requirements for the price and technical factors. Is this information required? If so, which factor should this be included with?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, Responsibility Determination is required. Please submit Responsibility Determination with Volume 2. Please refer to Page 9 of the Solicatition under Volume 2 , Responsibility Determination.

2. Solicitation Page 11 – “Surety Form”: Is there a minimum single award, aggregate bonding capacity, and remaining bonding capacity required?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The following has been removed from page 11 of the SF1442 and is no longer required, “The Offeror shall submit the Surety Form to report their surety bonding information, verifying aggregate bonding capacity, current available bonding, as well as single project limit. Ensure the name of the Offeror’s surety, including the name and phone number of the Offeror’s agent within the surety, is on the form. If the Offeror is a joint venture, the Offeror shall submit one Surety Form for the joint venture, not the individual joint venture members.” The surety form attachment has also been removed and is no longer required.

3. There are no specifications included in the solicitation. Will specifications be issued?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: See Specifications posted on 6 May 2021 to Beta.Sam.

4. Is all unit cost pricing included in the ELINS proposed as “Normal Working Hours”?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, unit cost pricing is proposed as “Normal Working Hours”.

5. In addition to the time spent at the various pass offices for standard base access, there are some facilities that require much more stringent security checks and access paperwork. Should this cost be accounted for in the unit cost for each ELIN?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, the cost should be accounted for in the unit costs for each ELIN.

6. Are there any sites or facilities that only allow US Citizens?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Refer to paragraph 1.2, Security Requirements of section 01 14 00 for citizenship requirements for different installations.

7. DOEE requires an engineered erosion & sediment control plan for any project disturbing 50SF or more. Will this be treated as a non pre-priced item if required for the project?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: If required for a DOEE project, an engineered erosion & sediment control plan will be treated as a non pre-priced item.

8. There are no requirements for Quality Control or SSHO listed in the solicitation. Please provide requirements for Superintendent, QC, and SSHO as they pertain to individual task orders and/or ordering offices. Will dual hatting or triple hatting be permitted?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Refer to paragraph 1.7.1.1.1 Additional Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) Requirements and Duties in section 01 35 26. The SSHO may also serve as the Quality Control Manager. Triple hatting will not be permitted.

9. Please confirm that the cost for development and submission of dig permits, outage requests, traffic control plans, APP, QCP, AHAs, material submittals shall be included as overhead in the unit cost of the ELINs provided.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The cost for development of pre-construction submittals shall be included as overhead in the unit cost of the ELIN items.

10. What percentage of task orders for the IDIQ are performed outside of “normal working hours”?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Historically, about 15% to 25% of the work corresponding to task orders under the Paving IDIQ is performed during off-hours.

11. Can you please provide a list of Naval Facilities and locations that would be included under this contract?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:

Naval Facilities and locations:

PWD PAX River PWD Quantico

JBAB

PWD Washington PWD SP/Indian Head PWD SP/Dahlgren PWD Bethesda PWD Annapolis Joint Base Andrews

12. Please provide historical percentages of the work performed at each of the ordering office locations.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:

Historical percentages by location are:

PWD PAX River 29% PWD Quantico 24%

JBAB 21%

PWD Washington 8% PWD SP/Indian Head 6% PWD SP/Dahlgren 4% PWD Bethesda 4% PWD Annapolis 2% Joint Base Andrews 2%

13. ELIN 0013 & 0014 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 01

16.17. This section was not included in the issued specification package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The referenced Specification Section should read 32 01 16.71 (COLD MILLING ASPHALT PAVING) not 32 01 16.17. Section 32 01 16.71 was included in the issued specifications package.

14. ELIN 0029 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 11 16.16 and Specification 32 11 24. Neither of these sections were included in the issued specification package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Referenced Specification Section 32 11 16.16 was renumbered to 32 11 20. Section 32 11 20 was included in the issued specification package. This section was amended to include base course for rigid pavements. Section 32 11 24 was renumbered to 32 11 23. Section 32 11 23 was included in the issued specification package.

15. ELIN 0032 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 92 13.

This section was not included in the issued specification package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The referenced Specification Section should read 32 92 19 (SEEDING) not 32 92 13. Section 32 92 19 was included in the issued specifications package.

16. ELIN 0042 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 13 11.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Referenced Specification Section 32 13 11 was renumbered to 32 13 14.13. Section 32 13 14.13 was included in the issued specification package.

17. ELIN 0049 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 10 00.

This section was not included in the issued specification package

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Referenced Specification Section 32 10 00 was renumbered to 32 11 26. Section 32 11 26 was included in the issued specification package.

18. ELIN 0050 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 12 10.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Referenced Specification Section 32 12 10 was renumbered to 32 12 13. Section 32 12 13 was included in the issued specification package.

19. ELIN 0054 & 0055 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 01

13. This section was not included in the issued specification package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Referenced Specification Section 32 01 13 was renumbered to 32 12 36.13. Section 32 12 36.13 was included in the issued specification package. The scope of ELIN 0054 is covered under Section 32 12 36.13 and the scope of ELIN 0055 is covered under Section 32 01 17.61, also included in the issued specification package.

20. ELIN 0058 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 01 17.62.

This section is for a paving fabric interlayer and does not include the work described in the description.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The scope of ELIN 0058 applies to Specification Section 32 01

17.62. Note that Section 32 01 17.62 cross-references Section 32 01 17.61 on sealing of asphalt cracks.

21. ELIN 0059 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 01 17. This section was not included in the issued specification package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Referenced Specification Section 32 01 17 was renumbered to 32 01 16.70. Section 32 01 16.70 was included in the issued specification package.

22. ELIN 0082, 0083, 0084, 0085, 0086, & 0095 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 32 17 23.00 20. These sections were not included in the issued specification package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Referenced Specification Section 32 17 23.00 20 was renumbered to 32 17 23. Section 32 17 23 was included in the issued specification package.

23. ELIN 0139 description directs the contractor to follow Specification Section 02 25 31.00

23 & 02 25 31.01 23. Neither of these sections were included in the issued specification package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Specification Section 33 01 30.16 replaces referenced sections 02 25 31.00 23 & 02 25 31.01 23.

24. Specification Section 32 13 14.13, Section 2.11.5 Paver-Finisher requires the use of a paver-finisher consisting of a heavy-duty, self-propelled machine designed specifically for paving and finishing high quality pavement, with a minimum weight of 2,200 pounds per foot of lane width, and powered by an engine having a minimum 6.0 horsepower per foot per lane width. Will hand placement with a power screed be acceptable?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Acceptability of hand placement with power screeds will be evaluated per task order basis.

25. Specification Section 32 13 13.06 and Section 32 13 14.13, Section 2.1.3.2 and 2.3.1.2 respectfully, Alkali Silica Reactivity is calling for the testing of the fine and coarse aggregate separately, using ASTM C1260. Reject individual aggregates with test results that indicate an expansion greater than 0.08 percent after 28 days of immersion in 1N NaOH solution, or perform additional testing as follows: utilize the proposed low alkali Portland cement, blended cement, and SCM, or Lithium Nitrate in combination with each individual aggregate. If only SCMs are being evaluated, with or without SCMs are being evaluated, test an expansion greater than 0.08.

The local sand deposit can have problems achieving this requirement.

Concerning ASR and testing of the aggregates, evaluate the fine and coarse aggregate separately, using ASTM C1260. Reject individual aggregates with test results that indicate an expansion of greater than 0.08 percent after 28 days of immersion in 1N NaOH solution. If only SCMs are being evaluated, test in accordance with ASTM C1567. If Lithium Nitrate is being evaluated, with or without SCMs, test in accordance with COE CRD-D 662. Determine the quantity that meets all the requirements of these specifications and that lowers the expansion equal to or less than 0.08 percent after 28 days of immersion in a 1N NaOH solution. Base the mixture proportioning on the highest percentage of SCM required to mitigate ASR-reactivity.

The local sand used in the cement mix has a problem meeting the 0.08 requirement. This material has been shown to exceed the 0.1 percent requirement in ASTM C1260. Can the ASR value be changed to match the requirements in Specification Section 03 30 00, Section 2.5.2.1 Alkali-Aggregate Reaction?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The maximum ASR expansion allowed for aggregates for concrete paving, covered under Section 32 13 13.06 and Section 32 13 14.13, will remain at 0.08% at 28 days. Concrete structural elements under Section 03 30 00 are typically not exposed to the elements the same way a concrete pavement is; hence the lower requirement.

2. Attachments:

- Revised 32 11 20

(End of Summary of Changes)