P090_SOLICITATION.pdf

P090 DB CO-GENERATION PLANT NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY (NRL), WASHINGTON, DC

COMPETITION REQURIEMENTS: FULL AND OPEN

SOURCE SELECTION PROCEDURES: BEST VALUE SOURCE SELECTION (BVSS), TRADEOFFS, TWO STEP DESIGN-BUILD

PROCEDUREMENT METHOD: CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATIONS

TYPE OF CONTRACT: FIRM FIXED PRICE

NAICS Code is 221112, FOSSIL/FUEL ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION

THE DESIGN BUILD BUDGET IS $16,000,000.

THE PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT FOR THIS PROJECT IS CYNTHIA CROWDER AT CYNDI.CROWDER@NAVY.MIL.

ALL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS WILL BE POSTED TO THE NAVY ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ONLINE (NECO) WEBSITE AT HTTPS://WWW.NECO.NAVY.MIL AND FEDERAL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES (FBO) AT HTTPS://WW.FBO.GOV.

POTENTIAL OFFERORS WILLNOT BE CONTACTED REGARDING ANY CHANGES POSTED.

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR PHASE I. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PHASE II.

CYNTHIA Y. CROWDER 202-685-3157

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

12-Apr-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________930 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________3 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________13 May 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All of fers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: (202) 685-3192 TEL: FAX:

N4008018R9328 49

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specified below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008018R9328

Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements

INFORMATION TO OFFERORS

1. This will be a two (2) phase procurement process. During this phase, the Government will select a maximum of five (5) most qualified Offerors to compete in Phase II. The continuation of Phase II instructions will be issued only to Offerors selected to compete in Phase II.

2. The Offeror shall submit three (3) separately bound copies of its Phase one proposal addressing Phase one Evaluation Factors 1, 2, 3 and 4 as prescribed in “The Evaluation Factors for Award” section of this solicitation. All proposal text documents shall be formatted on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with one inch margins using 11 point, times new roman font, on numbered pages and outlined in alpha-numeric format. Follow all instructions as stated in the Solicitation Submittal Requirements for each factor.

3. All proposals and copies shall be packaged in a sealed box. Please include, with proposals, one cover letter indicating your Point of Contact, mailing address, e-mail address, and phone number for this offering.

4. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT:

The primary points of contacts for this project is Cynthia Crowder cyndi.crowder@navy.mil and Pat Martin, patricia.d.martin@navy.mil.

5. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI):

CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE ENTIRE SOLICITATION

PACKAGE BEFORE SUBMITTING QUESTIONS. ALL INQUIRIES MUST BE

SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN COB 3 May 2019. All inquiries must be submitted in writing WORD FORMAT, and emailed to Cynthia Crowder at Cyndi.crowder@navy.mil and Pat Martin at patricia.d.martin@navy.mil on the RFI Form/, See Attachment B.

RFI CUT-OFF DATE IS 3 May 2019

6. PROPOSAL DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS:

Proposals may be sent via express mail carriers or hand-carried to the following address:

NAVFAC Washington Attn: Cynthia Crowder 1314 Harwood Street SE, Bldg. 212, First Floor Mail Room Washington Navy Yard Washington, DC 20374

All Phase one proposals must be received no later than 13 May 2019 at 2:00 PM

EST.

Facsimile copies will not be accepted

INSTRUCTIONS FOR HAND DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS:

The current security condition at the Washington Navy Yard requires escorts for entry to the base by individuals not possessing a U.S. Government DoD Common Access Card (CAC) identification card. Individuals without a DoD CAC will not be permitted to enter the Navy Yard. NAVFAC Washington will NOT be able to provide escorts for Navy Yard entry of hand delivered proposals. NAVFAC Washington will NOT receive hand delivered proposals at the Base Pass Office or any location other than that identified for receipt in the solicitation.

The Government considers use of a courier service, such as FedEx or UPS, as hand delivery of proposals and the responsibility for timely delivery resides with the offeror.

Offerors are notified that the entry point for proposals submitted through the U.S. Postal Service is at Joint Base Anacosta-Bolling and NOT at the Washington Navy Yard.

Proposals must be received by NAVFAC Washington at the Navy Yard by the due date and delivery time from the Joint Base Anacosta-Bolling to the Navy Yard cannot be predicted nor guaranteed.

Offerors should take this into consideration when determining delivery method.

Technical and Price proposals shall be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes marked in the bottom right corner “Solicitation N40080-18-R-9328, DO NOT OPEN.”

Please note offerors have the option to deliver the PRICE SCHEDULE via the Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE) website at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE/Welcome.aspx. Instructions on how to use SAFE can be found on this website. ONLY THE PRICE SCHEDULE AND SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN is allowed to be delivered via this website. Other information submitted via this website WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Submissions via this method are subject to the same proposals due date and time as listed above.

All proposals must be received prior to the due date and time. Any proposals submitted after the time set for receipt will be stamped with the date and hour of receipt and held unopened until after award. The file shall be documented in accordance with FAR 15.208(h).

7. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT:

There will be one Government scheduled site visit:

DATE: TBD

TIME: TBD

LOCATION: TBD

8. PROJECT INFORMATION:

Project Title: P090, DB, CO-GENERATION PLANT, NAVAL RESEARCH

LABORATORY, WASHINGTON, DC

Project Description: P090, DB, is a construction project for a co-generation plant with a combined heat and power (CHP) system to generate electricity and steam at the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, D.C. Project includes equipment pads for combustion turbine, steam generator, and other equipment that must be installed outside. Provide approximately 74 square meters (20'x40', 800 SF) pre-cast concrete equipment enclosure for electrical switchgear and storage. Equipment pads must be reinforced concrete mat foundations and slab-on-grade construction. The combustion turbine must be capable of producing 4,500 kW while producing 13,000 pounds of steam per hour from the heat contained in the waste heat of the exhaust of the combustion turbine.

Site preparation includes above ground site demolition and relocations, underground site demolition and utility relocations, excavation, grading preparation for construction and paving.

Mechanical systems will include water, sewer; Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and steam.

This project will provide Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features and comply with AT/FP regulations, and physical security mitigation in accordance with DoD Minimum Anti-Terrorism Standards for Buildings.

Commencement of Work: Work under this contract shall commence 15 days after award. Site access will not be available until notice to proceed is issued by the Contracting Officer. Once notice to proceed is issued, the Contractor will have 930 calendar days to complete the project.

NAICS Code: 221112 Liquidated Damages: $7,950.00 Per Calendar Day

9. The following milestones are established for this procurement:

Issue Solicitation: 12 April 2019 RFI Cut-off Date for Phase I: 03 May 2019 Proposal Due Date/Time for Phase I: 13 May 2019 by 2:00 PM Local Time Issue Solicitation for Phase II: TBD Contract Award: TBD

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A – Project Data sheet Attachment B – Request for Information (RFI) Attachment C – Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Attachment D, E, F – Small Business Utilization Forms

10. EVALUATION CRITERIA

BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value – the proposal most adventageous to the Government, cost/price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR

15.306 (a)) whose proposals have been determined to be within the competitive range.

If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are significantly more important than price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Phase I: The solicitation requires the evaluation of the following non-cost/price factors and sub-factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach (Acceptable or Unacceptable) Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance Factor 4 – Safety

Phase II: The solicitation requires the evaluation of the following non-cost, price and sub-factors:

Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization

PRICE

PHASE I EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1 – Technical Approach:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement.

Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two

(2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror.

This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. Offeror’s that are rated unacceptable will be found ineligible to proceed to phase II.

Factor 2 – Experience:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as size, scope, and complexity as follows:

Size: Co-generation of 4,500 kW-hr per hour (minimum) of electricity and 13,000 lbs. of steam per hour (minimum) AND greater than or equal to $10M in final project cost.

Scope: New construction of a co-generation plant for combined heating and power, consisting of a minimum of one Combustion Turbine Generator (CTG), coupled with a Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG).

Complexity: New construction of a co-generation plant as indicated in the Scope above. In addition, the projects submitted must collectively demonstrate experience with:

• Design-build delivery method; and

• Fuel gas compressor package to boost natural gas supply

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed (contract completion date/CCD) within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. In addition, such entity must be named in narrative and organizational chart submitted under factor 1.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as size, scope, and complexity as follows:

Size: Co-generation of 4,500 kW-hr per hour (minimum) of electricity and 13,000 lbs. of steam per hour (minimum) AND greater than or equal to $10M in final project cost.

Scope: New construction of a co-generation plant for combined heating and power, consisting of a minimum of one Combustion Turbine Generator (CTG), coupled with a Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG)

Complexity: New construction of a co-generation plant as indicated in the Scope above. In addition, the projects submitted must collectively demonstrate experience with:

• Design-build delivery method; and,

• Fuel gas compressor package to boost natural gas supply

Design projects submitted shall have construction completed (contract completion date/CCD) within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods).

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. Per factor 1, such entity must be named in narrative and organizational chart submitted under factor 1.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design-subcontractor.

Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant aggregate experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. A minimum of three (3) projects for construction, and three (3) projects for design must be submitted, but the Government will only review a maximum of five projects for construction and a maximum of five for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Proposals may be strengthened if submitted projects possess:

(A) For Construction Experience:

1. Erosion and sediment control/storm water management permitting with the

District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment (DC DOEE).

2. Multiple (2 or more) design-build project experience.

3. Demonstrate that the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together.

4. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features and demonstrated compliance with AT/FP regulations, and physical security mitigation in accordance with DoD Minimum Anti-Terrorism Standards for Buildings.

5. Experience integrating co-generation plants into existing steam generation plants.

6. Experience with installing underground electrical mains in high density developed areas.

7. Experience with Low Impact Development (LID).

(B) For Design Experience:

1. Erosion and sediment control/storm water management permitting with the

District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment (DC DOEE).

2. Multiple (2 or more) design-build project experience.

3. Demonstrate that the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together.

4. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features and demonstrated compliance with AT/FP regulations, and physical security mitigation in accordance with DoD Minimum Anti-Terrorism Standards for Buildings.

5. Experience integrating co-generation plants into existing steam generation plants.

6. Experience with installing underground electrical mains in high density developed areas.

7. Experience with Low Impact Development (LID).

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed AE Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment C) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information.

However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact,Cynthia Crowder, Contracting Officer cyndi.crowder@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance awards or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other recent and relevant projects currently documented in known sources. For the purposes of evaluating past performance under this factor a relevant and recent project is defined as Design-build, new construction, greater than or equal to $10,000,000 and completed within the past 7 years of the issuance of this RFP.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

Factor 4 – Safety:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR); include three previous calendar years’ worth of data (2016, 2017, 2018). This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If there is no EMR premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the element.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) rates.

Submit three previous calendar years’ worth of data (2016, 2017, 2018). If the OSHA DART rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data negatively should be addressed as part of this element.

(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) rates. Submit three previous calendar years’ worth of data (2016, 2017, 2018). If the OSHA TRC rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data negatively should be addressed as part of this element.

(4) Technical Approach for Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Fully describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work, and the offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, and selecting all tiers of subcontractors. Also describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

Note: For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Safety narratives for joint ventures may be up to four pages in length.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its sub-contractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s Experience Modification Rates (EMR) will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk EMR Rate Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1

Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Rate

Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

Data trends will also be considered.

PHASE II: Evaluation Factors

Factor 5 – Technical Solution

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

- Exterior façade describing how the proposed construction integrates with the surrounding area and existing base facilities design or architectural theme.

- Site layout indicating size and orientation of the cogeneration equipment and support equipment, prefabricated building, roadways, parking (include ingress and egress), emergency vehicle access, and ATFP standoff distances to scale.

Also include in the narrative a description of the general concept proposed to meet low impact development (LID).

- How the cogeneration system components will be installed, integrated, and commissioned.

- How the electrical feeder for the cogeneration plant will be installed and connected to the existing substation switchgear.

- How the existing utility relocations on site will be performed.

- How the cybersecurity requirements will be met for the cogeneration system controls and components.

- Manufacturers published data for proposed Combustion Turbine Generator

(CTG) and Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG). CTG data must include make and model, power output, heat rate, and exhaust output. HRSG data must include make and model, and capacity. Published data is not counted in the sheet count limitations. Do not combine with other sheets.

- The Offeror should express whether they intend to comply with the solicitation requirements. Offeror shall use the site plans provided as a basis for their concept, per the RFP (Part 6). Clearly list any proposed deviations to the RFP if required as part of your strategy to complete the design and construction of the facility within funds available for construction. Any changes and improvements to the RFP shall specifically identify the impact to the overall project, such as SF changes to spaces, exterior façade, changes in pedestrian and vehicular access, changes in site features, etc. Proposed features that exceed requirements will be evaluated for compliance with MILCON rules.

Narrative shall not exceed three (3) double-sided pages (or six (6) single-sided pages).

Up to three (3) conceptual drawings may be provided to supplement the narrative (i.e., floor plan, exterior elevation, and site plan).

(c) The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

FACTOR 6 – SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

This Factor assesses both the historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns as subcontractors and proposed small business participation and commitment strategies.

a. Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

1. Achievements: All offerors shall provide a narrative (limited to two pages) to describe their achievements in supporting the Government’s policy to provide maximum practicable opportunities for small business (SB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and women-owned small business (WOSB) concerns to participate as subcontractors consistent with efficient contract performance.

In support of narrative submissions:

a. All offerors shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor in the format provided in Attachment Small Business Subcontracting Record.

b. Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall also provide copies of the most current individual subcontracting reports (ISRs) associated with each project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor if a small business subcontracting plan was required by the contract. If such projects were completed under specific task orders, provide ISRs for the overall contract. For cited projects with state and local government agencies, provide similar subcontracting performance reports if required by the contracts. When not specifically addressed in the ISR or similar report, offerors shall provide explanations for all instances of failures to meet dollar or percentage goals in individual subcontracting plans.

The Government reserves the right to consider achievement information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources. A relevant and recent project is defined as a Design-build, new construction, greater than or equal to $10M, completed within the past 7 years of the issuance of this RFP. Offerors utilizing achievements information of team members or key subcontractors shall clearly demonstrate how these companies will have meaningful involvement in the management of the subcontracting program for this acquisition. If not, such achievement information will not be considered under this factor. If the offeror is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities. Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.

Small Business Participation and Commitment: All offerors shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy on the Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy Form/ Attachment E. This should include all data elements.

a. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the offeror will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

b. Include supplemental narratives (limited to five pages) to address other elements of the offeror’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

c. The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition (i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the contract value. Offerors are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in the Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy consistent with efficient contract performance. Offerors shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award. All offerors shall submit the above requested information on the Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy form/Attachment E.

(d) Basis of Evaluation:

Offerors will be evaluated on the extent to which their proposals and other performance information available to the Government demonstrate a history of successfully supporting Government policies concerning utilization of small business concerns as subcontractors including, when applicable, achievements against established small business subcontracting plan goals. Offerors will also be evaluated on the levels of small business participation proposed and the degree of commitment to use named sources. The anticipated benefits of proposed initiatives and tools to enhance small business participation and capabilities will be considered. The Government will assess proposal realism and the likelihood of success in achieving the small business objectives of this acquisition.

Forms to be used for Offeror submission of Small Business Utilization Factor information are:

Attachment (D) - Small Business Subcontracting Record

Price

The price proposals shall be submitted separate from technical proposals. The offeror shall submit (1) original, marked “Original”, and (1) copy, marked “copy”, in a separate three ring binder (1&/1/2 inch. minimum) with the following:

• SF1442, signed with all amendments acknowledged

• Price Schedule

• Bid Guarantee in accordance with Provision NFAS 5252.228-9302-Bid

Guarantee

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime

Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address.

Price will be submitted on the Price Schedule included in the solicitation that includes completion of all contract line items (CLINS).

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 00100 or equivalent solicitation provision of the solicitation.

of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the

RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1

P090 CO-GENERATION PLANT, NRL

FFP

Basis of bid for Itme 0001 shall be all labor, management, supervision, toolds, materials and provisions for the entire work in accordance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) FOB: Destination

NET AMT

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 70 00 - Conditions of the Contract

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government SEP 2006 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures MAY 2014 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or

Improper Activity

MAY 2014

52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity MAY 2014 52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

OCT 2010

52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct OCT 2015 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-2 Alt II Security Requirements (Aug 1996) - Alternate II APR 1984 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-5 Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business) OCT 2014 52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

OCT 2018

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-17 Ownership or Control of Offeror JUL 2016 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.207-3 Right of First Refusal of Employment MAY 2006 52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic

Corporations--Representation

NOV 2015

52.209-5 Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters OCT 2015

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

OCT 2015

52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters

OCT 2018

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

52.210-1 Market Research APR 2011 52.211-12 Liquidated Damages--Construction SEP 2000 52.211-13 Time Extensions SEP 2000 52.211-14 Notice Of Priority Rating For National Defense, Emergency

Preparedness, and Energy Program Use

APR 2008

52.211-15 Defense Priority And Allocation Requirements APR 2008 52.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantity APR 1984 52.215-2 Audit and Records--Negotiation OCT 2010 52.215-8 Order of Precedence--Uniform Contract Format OCT 1997 52.217-4 Evaluation Of Options Exercised At The Time Of Contract

Award

JUN 1988

52.217-8 Option To Extend Services NOV 1999 52.219-4 Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small

Business Concerns

OCT 2014

52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns OCT 2018 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan AUG 2018 52.219-28 Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation JUL 2013 52.222-1 Notice To The Government Of Labor Disputes FEB 1997 52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-4 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards - Overtime

Compensation

MAY 2018

52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the Work

MAY 2014

52.222-6 Construction Wage Rate Requirements AUG 2018 52.222-7 Withholding of Funds MAY 2014 52.222-8 Payrolls and Basic Records AUG 2018 52.222-9 Apprentices and Trainees JUL 2005 52.222-10 Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements FEB 1988 52.222-12 Contract Termination-Debarment MAY 2014 52.222-13 Compliance With Construction Wage Rate Requirements and

Related Regulations

MAY 2014

52.222-14 Disputes Concerning Labor Standards FEB 1988 52.222-15 Certification of Eligibility MAY 2014 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities APR 2015 52.222-22 Previous Contracts And Compliance Reports FEB 1999 52.222-23 Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to Ensure

Equal Employment Opportunity for Construction

FEB 1999

52.222-26 Equal Opportunity SEP 2016 52.222-27 Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for

Construction

APR 2015

52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans OCT 2015 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities JUL 2014 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans FEB 2016 52.222-40 Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor

Relations Act

DEC 2010

52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons JAN 2019 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification OCT 2015 52.222-55 Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 DEC 2015

52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving

AUG 2011

52.223-19 Compliance with Environmental Management Systems MAY 2011 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.225-25 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain

Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-- Representation and Certifications.

AUG 2018

52.227-1 Authorization and Consent DEC 2007 52.227-2 Notice And Assistance Regarding Patent And Copyright

Infringement

DEC 2007

52.227-4 Patent Indemnity-Construction Contracts DEC 2007 52.227-14 Rights in Data--General MAY 2014 52.227-17 Rights In Data-Special Works DEC 2007 52.227-23 Rights to Proposal Data (Technical) JUN 1987 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee SEP 1996 52.228-2 Additional Bond Security OCT 1997 52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.228-11 Pledges Of Assets AUG 2018 52.228-12 Prospective Subcontractor Requests for Bonds MAY 2014 52.228-14 Irrevocable Letter of Credit NOV 2014 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds--Construction OCT 2010 52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013 52.232-5 Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts MAY 2014 52.232-17 Interest MAY 2014 52.232-18 Availability Of Funds APR 1984 52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims MAY 2014 52.232-27 Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts JAN 2017 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award

Management

OCT 2018

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014 52.233-1 Alt I Disputes (May 2014) -…