N39430-19-D-2110_WFI_A-E_Synopsis.pdf

AE Synopsis WFI OCONUS/CONUS

Revised JUL 2017

N39430-19-R-2110 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACTS FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR Waterfront Facilities Inspection and Assessment, OCONUS and CONUS Regions as listed below:

Region OCONUS: Region is defined as worldwide, less areas defined in the associated solicitations for Waterfront Inspection A&E services within Regions 1, 2, 3 and 4

Region One (1): Region 1 is defined as follows: Northeast, Southeast (including Key West)

Great Lakes areas, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Region Two (2): Region 2 is defined as follows: Mid-Atlantic Region- Virginia, Maryland and

Washington DC.

Region Three (3): Region 3 is defined as follows: Southwest, Hawaii and Gulf Coast areas.

Region Four (4): Region 4 is defined as follows: Northwest area (including Alaska) and all

Outlying Areas as defined by FAR Part 2, including but not exclusive of American Samoa, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Midway Island, Wake Island, Johnston Atoll, Baker

Island and the Northern Mariana Islands.

Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A

STANDARD FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED

HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in five (5) separate Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for underwater and above water inspection, material condition assessment, engineering and design services in support of

Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) and Military Construction (MILCON) projects at DoD waterfront and ocean facilities at various locations worldwide and in Regions 1 through 4. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of

Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. An A and E firm will not be excluded from any region based upon an award in any other single region. As such multiple regions may be awarded to a single firm. The A and E firm will distinguish which Region(s) it desires to be considered for in their submittal package (SF330). If the A and E firm desires to be considered for the OCONUS Region a separate SF330 shall be submitted.

Each individual IDIQ contract will be for one (1) 60- month period. The total fee for each contract term shall not exceed $15,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term is

$10,000. The minimum quantity and order value for each task order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value of $10,000. The contractor is not obligated to honor any order or a combination of orders in excess of $1,000,000 IAW FAR 52.216-19. The maximum quantity and order value for all orders issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value of $15,000,000. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for each contract.

Estimated start date is December 2019.

As the OCONUS contract will cover work worldwide, it will be competed UNRESTRICTED.

Revised JUL 2017

The proposed contracts for Regions 1 through 4 are being solicited exclusively as a 100% Total

Small Business Set-Aside. The Small Business size standard classification is North American

Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330 Engineering Services- Marine

Engineering and Naval Architecture. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study N3943018S0001/ N3943018S0002 conducted by Naval Facilities

Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center (NAVFAC EXWC) included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit the OCONUS procurement on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition and set aside Regions 1 through 4 under the

100% Small Business Set-Aside Program. The NAVFAC EXWC small business office concurs with this decision.

The type of Architect-Engineer services expected to be performed under this contract are field investigations, underwater inspections; engineering analysis of waterfront and ocean facility structural, mechanical and electrical systems and component conditions in comparison to design requirements, previous inspection reports and/or existing drawings of the facilities; review of construction plans and specifications of engineering features and related work associated with waterfront and ocean facility construction and repair; engineering calculations for structural analysis with or without previous design calculations; failure analysis and forensic engineering;

waterfront and ocean facility engineering feasibility studies; design of facility repairs;

preparation of Design/Build RFPs and Invitation For Bid contract plans and specifications;

environmental studies in support of permit applications to federal, state, and local regulatory agencies; preparation of required permit documentation; design of underwater instrument and cable arrays, associated power and data cable installation and termination, including fiber optic elements; design of underwater instrument support structures and assemblies; design of termination junction boxes and support structures; design of underwater cable installation using horizontal direction drilling technology, including the establishment of directional drilling monitoring and response criteria to minimize environmental effects of directional drilling;

documentation of findings and report preparation; cost estimation for waterfront and ocean facility rehabilitation; construction and installation schedules, development of maintenance action plans, underwater geotechnical and above water surveying.

The types of Task Order submittals may include, but not be limited to inspection and condition assessment reports, engineering alternatives analyses and basis of repair/design reports, engineering calculations, engineering plans and specifications, construction cost estimates, and technical reviews.

Additional products and services may include construction contract drawings using computer-aided design and drafting (CADD), per the A/E/C CADD Standard, and specifications produced in SPECSINTACT with Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) using the Unified

Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS); Building Information Model (BIM) modeling, Waterfront UNIFORMAT II classifications standard; contract bid analyses; post construction award services (PCAS); Title II inspection services; database design, construction and population; procedures and guidelines reports; static and dynamic structural analyses using finite

Revised JUL 2017 element computer modeling; two and three-dimensional structure modeling and rendering;

seismic vulnerability assessments, including use of finite element models and time history acceleration data for linear and/or nonlinear analyses of critical elements and development of retrofit schemes.

A waterfront facility is defined as any structure located on the waterfront, in connection with, or potentially in contact with, water or the marine environment. This would include inland structures that require underwater investigations. Waterfront facilities include, but are not limited to piers, wharves, bulkheads, quaywalls, offshore towers, dams, levees, water control structures, instrument support structures, dry docks, moorings, underwater cables, or any similar structure.

All waterfront facility assessments, including underwater inspections will be performed under direct control and supervision of registered professional engineer-divers. For each underwater assessment, one registered professional engineer-diver shall be appointed as the engineer-in-charge (EIC). That EIC shall dive at least 50% of the time, supervise the writing of the detailed inspection report, and write at least 50% of the detailed inspection reports.

The other engineers on-site may write the balance of the inspection report. The EIC shall ensure that all field inspection operations, including diving, are performed in accordance with reference

(c), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements EM 385-1-1 (November

2014). US citizenship for all on-site personnel, including the requirement to pass a Federal Law

Enforcement Agency Background Screening Process for access to Government sites is required.

This contract will set the labor fees and overhead rates for the A&E’s labor positions, and any subcontractor labor positions, for the 60- month period. All fees and rates will be negotiated at the time of issue. Multiple Task Orders may be awarded with similar delivery schedules requiring the firm to provide services with overlapping work/delivery dates.

All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Web site: https://www.sam.gov.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300, Organizational Conflicts of

Interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews will be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

Security Requirements: Work performed will be at the SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED level. The government does not anticipate the need for a security clearance, however, if clearances are subsequently required the contractor shall comply with SECNAV M5510.30, SECNAV Instruction M-5239.2, and Department of Defense (DoD) 8570.01-M. The contractor shall establish and maintain an access list of those employees working on the Contract.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms https://www.sam.gov/

Revised JUL 2017 to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. Selection criteria are listed in descending order of importance. Criteria (7) is of least importance and will be used as a tie-breaker among technically equal firms. Specific selection criteria include:

1. Specialized Experience

2. Professional Qualifications

3. Safety

4. Past Performance

5. Quality Control

6. Program Management and Capacity and Location

7. Volume of Work

Criterion 1- Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in:

1. Waterfront Inspections to include both topside and underwater

2. Structural condition assessments, including the use of destructive and non-destructive techniques

3. Static and dynamic structural analyses, including seismic vulnerability assessments and vessel/structure interaction analyses of waterfront facilities using computer aided tools

4. Geotechnical investigations related to pile and gravity based foundations

5. Testing and evaluation of structural material samples

6. Evaluation of both impressed current and sacrificial anode type cathodic protection systems on waterfront and submerged structures

7. Preparation of waterfront facilities repair cost estimates, including Form DD1391

8. Design and engineering services associated with underwater instrument and cable arrays, including the use of horizontal directional drilling

Firms may be considered more favorably by demonstrating the following:

1. Applied research and technology to perform engineering services with greater efficiency while maintaining quality.

Submission requirements:

Provide a maximum of six (6) projects completed within the past three (3) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Sufficient information to determine the date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

Revised JUL 2017

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work, either as the prime contractor or subcontractor under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the

DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm

Name” Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted;

however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects must be submitted for each joint venture partner to depict that particular experience pertinent to this solicitation, not to exceed a total of three (3) projects. Firms failing to provide projects from all joint venture partners will be considered to have not met the requirements of the criterion.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects.

Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The

Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 1.

Criterion 2- Professional Qualifications (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects as outlined in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Specific disciplines and licenses that must be included in key personnel are:

Project Manager: U.S. state licensed engineer with one of the following engineering disciplines—ocean, structural, civil, mechanical, electrical or geotechnical.

Revised JUL 2017

Senior Engineer: U.S. state licensed engineer with one of the following engineering disciplines—ocean, structural, civil, mechanical, electrical or geotechnical.

Senior Engineer Diver: U.S. state licensed engineer with one of the following engineering disciplines—ocean, structural, civil, mechanical, electrical or geotechnical. Certificate for diver training as required within the current Contract

Diving Operations section of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers EM385-1-1 manual.

Qualifications for all diving personnel proposed for this contract shall include, but not be limited to, training certifications and medical certifications as required within the current Contract

Diving Operations section of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers EM385-1-1 manual.

Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one (1) page and should indicate: professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent within the past three years’ project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract; current level of diver certification and able to accomplish such work in a safe and efficient manner; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Also, indicate in this section (Section E) the participation of key personnel in example projects noted in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Criterion 3- Safety (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Submission Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR); include three previous calendar years’ worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no

EMR exists. If there is no EMR premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the element.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total

Recordable Case (TRC) Rates; submit three previous calendar years’ worth of data. If the OSHA DART and TRC rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively should be addressed as part of this element.

Revised JUL 2017

(3) Technical Approach for Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Fully describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. Also describe any innovative methods that the

Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

Note: The narrative shall be limited to two pages. For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture;

however, only one safety narrative is required. Safety narratives for joint ventures may be up to four pages in length.

Firms will be evaluated on their safety record with Government agencies and private industry, focusing on waterfront and field operations.

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its sub-contractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors.

The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment

Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The

Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s Experience Modification Rates (EMR) will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk EMR

Very Low Risk Less than 0.6

Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8

Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0

High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1

Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1

Revised JUL 2017

Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Rate

Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0

Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99

Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99

High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0

Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate

Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49

Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49

Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49

High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99

Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

Criterion 4- Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in

Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 will be given greater weight.

Submission Requirements:

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past

Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different

Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this

Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the

Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Engineering and

Expeditionary Warfare Center, Code ACQ71, Attn: Monica Razo-Shepherd via email at monica.razo-shepherd@navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by

Revised JUL 2017 reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 5- Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements:

Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract

A narrative of the firm's quality control methods outlining specific personnel

(including their discipline/specialty) and procedures for above- water field inspections and diving operations, technical report preparation, structural assessments, analysis and design services is required for review. Of special interest are the QC processes in place that minimize the Governments effort to QA the firm's work product for errors, omissions, and quality.

4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

Criterion 6- Program Management and Capacity and Location (SF330, Part I, Section

H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish up to three (3) separate projects or task orders concurrently in the required timeframe, and the demonstrated knowledge of the primary geographic areas in which projects could be located. Capacity includes maintaining schedule for report submission while simultaneously executing field operations.

Revised JUL 2017

Submission Requirements:

1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team

(including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. Discuss specifically how surge workload would be managed to complete three (3) projects at once. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

3. Provide the location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas in which projects could be located and for each Region they wish to be considered for.

Criterion 7—Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

(DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the

Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD A&E contracts.

Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

Revised JUL 2017

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF-

330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11 point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 50 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the

Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one-page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11-point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables).

Please include your DUNS and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330.

**In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

Architect-engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit one (1) electronic copy and three (3) hard (paper) copies of the SF-330 to Naval

Facilities Engineering Command EXWC, Code ACQ71, Attn: Monica Razo-Shepherd, Naval

Base Ventura County, 1100 23rd Ave., Bldg. 1100, Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4347. Outside corner of mailing envelope shall be labeled as follows: N39430-19-R-2110. Firms responding to this announcement by 19 February 2019 no later than 1600 PST will be considered. THIS IS

NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The points of contact are either Monica Razo-Shepherd, Contract Specialist, at 805-982-5561, monica.razo-shepherd@navy.mil or Keith L. Garascia, Contracting Officer, 805-982-2515, keith.garascia@navy.mil.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Facsimile SF-330's submissions are not authorized. Site visits will not be arranged during the submittal period. Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to monica.razo-shepherd@navy.mil.