SECTION_J_Att_E_-_QASP.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Explosion Effects, Risk Assessment, and Protective Construction Support for Explosives Safety.
Solicitation number
N3943018R2031
Issued by

About this file

SECTION_J_Att_E_-_QASP.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SECTION_J_Att_C_-_Sched_of_FFP_rates_revised2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3943018R2031_AMD_0003.pdf PDF
N3943018R2031_AMD_0002.pdf PDF
SECTION_J_Att_C_-_Sched_of_FFP_rates_revised.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3943018R2031_AMD_0001.pdf PDF
SECTION_J_Att_D_-_RFI_Form.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Quality Assessment Surveillance Plan (QASP)

1. Purpose

This Quality Assessment Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a structure for evaluation of contractor performance on the Explosion Effects, Risk Assessment, and Protective Construction Support for Explosives Safety contract. This QASP is a living document and may be modified without modifying the contract. A copy of this QASP will be provided to the contractor.

2. Roles and Responsibilities

The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) will evaluate contractor performance. In the event of unsatisfactory outcomes or performance, the COR will notify the Contracting Officer and Contractor.

3. Assessment Frequency and Methodology Assessment, Criteria, and Approach

Table 1 – Performance Assessment Form below lists contract objectives, tasks, performance expectations, and evaluation criteria and may be used for recording ratings and notes. The COR is responsible for all evaluation. All metrics are qualitative (not numeric). Incentives consist of feedback (praise or constructive criticism), and the CPARS evaluation. At least every three months, the COR will compare contractor performance with the expectations and document to file the contractor’s performance in each table category. Unless unsatisfactory performance is noted, no action needs be taken until the annual CPARS evaluation.

CPARS Reporting

This contract meets the mandatory evaluation dollar threshold and will be evaluated at least annually using the web based Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). No separate report will be prepared; however, in the event of unsatisfactory performance, notification will be given as soon as the unsatisfactory performance is noted.

Table 1 – Performance Assessment Form

Primary Task
Sub-Tasks
Standard
Acceptable Quality

Level Assessment Level

How it will be inspected
Performance Rating: (Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Poor, Unsatisfactory)
Risk Assessment Program Support
Risk-based analyses and development of explosives safety guidance
Analyses are technically competent and explosives safety guidance is well thought out and rationale
Risk-based analyses pass peer review and explosives safety guidance is considered
COR shall review submittal upon receipt of documentation
Documentation shall be assessed for technical validity, compliance with accepted practices, and clarity
Preparation of technical documents and development of briefings
Documents are technically accurate and clearly convey message and/or concepts
Technical documents pass peer review and briefings convey message
COR shall review submittal upon receipt of documentation
Documentation shall be assessed for technical validity, compliance with accepted practices, and clarity
DDESB Science Panel Support
Development of blast effects & consequence models
Proposed models are technically valid and represent the state-of-the-art
Proposed models pass peer review
COR shall review submittal upon receipt of documentation
Documentation shall be assessed for technical validity, compliance with accepted practices, and clarity
Testing support (development of test plans, execution, data analysis, etc)
Support is conducive to successful conduct of test and production of testing report and associated analyses
Testing support was conducive to a successful test environment
COR shall review submittal upon receipt of documentation and test summary
Documentation shall be assessed for technical validity, compliance with accepted practices, and clarity
DoD Protective Construction Support
Conduct design and analysis per UFC 3-340-02 or other applicable criteria
Engineering analysis is technically correct and in accordance with regulatory criteria
Analysis and calculations pass technical review
COR shall review submittal upon receipt of documentation
Documentation shall be assessed for technical validity, compliance with accepted practices, and clarity
Reduced QD assessment and structural analysis
Analyses are technically competent and explosives safety assessment is analytically supported
Technical analysis and assessment passes engineering review
COR shall review submittal upon receipt of documentation and test summary
Documentation shall be assessed for technical validity, compliance with accepted practices, and clarity

File details come from the government source that posted it.