23R4017 Kombewa Kenya Amend 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N3319123R4017 D-B Upgrade Water System, Kombew a CRC, Kenya

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 11-Sep-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N3319123R4017

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Aug-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11-Sep-2023

CODE

NAVFAC EUROPE AFRICA CENTRAL

VIALE PORTO CAPODICHINO

NAPOLI 80144

N33191 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N3319123R4017

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

Subject solicitation is amended to respond to Pre-Proposal Inquiries.

Inquiry 001

During the site visit we noted there is a borehole. There is no information concerning the borehole functionality, pumping rate, water quality test etc.

Question: Should the offeror only be concerned with what is currently produced in terms of water volume or potential boreholes to meet demand is also part of consideration?

Response to Inquiry 001

Per the RFP, the Contractor must provide at least 24,000 L of elevated storage. No additional boreholes are anticipated with this project.

Inquiry 002

Distribution pipes from the well to the underground water storage facility pass through a tarmac road.

Question: Are the existing details on the materials used, i.e., sleeve type and size? What were the protection measures at the drainage crossings? Were there concrete covers/encasement to protect the pipes from being washed away by storm water?

Question: If information is not provided or currently available, should the offeror recommend further investigation e.g., /test pit etc. to determine existing condition to determine new installation?

Response to Inquiry 002

There is no available information on the sleeve type and size. If the Contractor's designer deems necessary, pipe crossings under the drainage ditch may require protection to prevent being washed away.

Inquiry 003

We noted the Scope of Work for the underground storage facility only has exterior face-lift recommended.

Question: Is there details on the conditional of the interior storage surface and if there is a potential leakage in the near future requiring coating to mitigate leaks?

Response to Inquiry 003 The Contractor will be required to inspect the existing underground storage facility including the interior and provide recommendations on future repair.

Inquiry 004

N3319123R4017

During our site visit, we observed the area provided for the proposed water tower construction is very defined/small.

The construction will involve removal of the nearby pavement slabs and replacing them after completion.

Question: Was this considered to be part of the scope of work, or a new site will be considered to avoid additional restoration work?

Response to Inquiry 004

If necessary, the Contractor should consider the temporary removal and replacement of items in order to install the water tower at the proposed location. During the design phase of the project, the Contractor and their designer can recommend adjusting the location to reduce impacts to the site; however, this is subject to approval.

Inquiry 005

During our site visit we noted that currently all the pipes are surface run.

Question: Should the contractor consider the best installation methodology on running the pipes in the structures, protected, and not exposed?

Response to Inquiry 005

Yes, the Contractor should consider the best installation method given local standard practices as defined in the

RFP.

Inquiry 006

Information on approved dump sites is required. Cutting off waste materials involves demolition/excavation and dumping away from site.

Question: Is there a dump site recommended and hauling distance for cost estimating?

Response to Inquiry 006

The Contractor is responsible for finding an acceptable dump site.

(End of Summary of Changes)