J-13 Past Performance Questionnaire Rev. 2.docx
DOCX document 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- USNS JOHN LEWIS PSA Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N3220523R4212
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor. The questionnaire is being sent by the Military Sealift Command to a reference provided by a contractor bidding on an upcoming contract. The questionnaire asks the reference to provide ratings and comments on the contractor's past performance in areas such as technical quality, schedule, management, and small business subcontracting. It also asks if the reference would hire the contractor for future work. Responses are requested by February 24, 2023.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Military Sealift Command for a Post Shakedown Availability for the USNS JOHN LEWIS. The work will begin on or about September 1, 2023 and take approximately 165 days. The vessel will undergo availability work at the contractor's facility.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ATTACHMENT J-13
TO: EMAIL:
PHONE:
INFORMATION REQUEST
Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract.
___________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under contract number ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (24 February 2023 at 1700 hours, 5:00 PM Eastern) to Doug Jones and Chris Johns at jeffrey.d.jones156.civ@us.navy.mil and christopher.m.johns6.civ@us.navy.mil . Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.
| Thank you, |
| Doug Jones |
| Contracting Officer |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation. ______________________
2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| FACTOR |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
TECHNICAL (QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE)
SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS
MANAGEMENT OR BUSINESS RELATIONS
SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING
OTHER (AS APPLICABLE)
3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.
Signed: __________________________________ Title: ____________________________________ Organization: _____________________________
DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .