J_-_13__PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS ARCTIC Mid-Term Availability Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N32205-18-R-4256
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

J-13

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USNS ARCTIC Mid-Term Availability, newest first.
File Type Posted
J_-_3_B_Items_Amended_Rev_3.xls XLS spreadsheet
J_-_2_Amended_Rev_3.xls XLS spreadsheet
N3220518R4256_AMEND_0004.docx DOCX document
0115_B_Steel_Renewal_Amend_3.doc DOC document
N3220518R4256_AMEND_0003.docx DOCX document
J_-_3_Category_B_Items_ARCTIC.xls XLS spreadsheet
N3220518R4256_0002.docx DOCX document
Work_Item_604_MSFSC_SWIRRR_002.docx DOCX document
Work_Item_604_S9086-TX-STM-010_7_0.pdf PDF
Ref_29198-MAETS-USNS_ARCTIC-DWG.pdf PDF
Arctic_N32205-18-R-4256_MTA_Index_Amendment_1_(003).docx DOCX document
0021_A_CLEAN_AND_GAS_FREE_TANKS_VOIDS_AND_COFFERDAMS_REV_OCT_2012__Amend_1.doc DOC document
0107_A_7-105-0-JJ_TANK_TOP_GAUGING_AND_STEEL_REPLACEMENT.docx DOCX document
0113_A_REPLACE_SOUNDING_TUBE_DECK_SOCKET_COVERS_Amend_1.doc DOC document
Ref_6359953_D.pdf PDF
0103_ABS_TANK_INSPECTION_AND_TESTING_REV-Amend_1.doc DOC document
01005_A_Station_Six_Anti_Slack_Device_Repair_Support-Amend_1.doc DOC document
Ref_085-8385180__ARCTIC_GA_REV_-.pdf PDF
REVISED_J_-_2_Category_A_Items_ARCTIC.xls XLS spreadsheet
0507_A_SSDG_TURBOCHARGER_OVERHAUL_Amend_1.docx DOCX document
REVISED_J_-_3_Category_B_Items_ARCTIC.xls XLS spreadsheet
Ref_29198-MAETS-USNS_ARCTIC.pdf PDF
0508_A_SSDG_GOVERNOR_OVERHAUL_Amend_1.docx DOCX document
0114_B_Weatherdeck_Drain_Piping_Repair_Amend_1.doc DOC document
N32205-18-R-4256_Amend_0001.docx DOCX document
01003_A_Saddle_Winch_and_Saddle_Foundation_Refurbishment-Arctic_1.doc DOC document
Q_AND_A_Responses___3.docx DOCX document
0003_A_APPROACH_BERTH_AND_MOORING_REQUIREMENTS_REV_08Nov17.docx DOCX document
0011_A__GENERAL_SERVICES_FOR_SHIP_T_AOE_REV_FEB_14_ARCTIC_1.doc DOC document
0101_A_REPLACE_AFT_HOUSE_03_LEVEL_OVERHEAD_STEEL_(ABS)_ARCTIC_1.doc DOC document
Q_AND_A_Responses_2.docx DOCX document
0102_A_REPLACE_DECK_MACHINERY_SHOP_OVERHEAD_STEEL_(ABS)_ARCTIC_1.doc DOC document
Q_AND_A_Responses_1.docx DOCX document
0112_A_CHT_TANKS_STEEL_REPLACEMENT_REV-ARCTIC_1.doc DOC document
0103_ABS_TANK_INSPECTION_AND_TESTING_REV-ARCTIC_2.doc DOC document
0504_A_PORT_AND_STBD_RHIB_DAVIT_INSPECTION_REV-ARCTIC_1.docx DOCX document
0003_A_APPROACH_BERTH_AND_MOORING_REQUIREMENTS_REV_08Nov17.docx DOCX document
J_-_2_Category_A_Items_ARCTIC_Corrected.xls XLS spreadsheet
J_-_2_Category_A_Items_ARCTIC.xls XLS spreadsheet
J_-_10_Interport_Differential_-_Arctic_Nov_MTA_2018.docx DOCX document
J_-_8_Request_for_Spec_Clarification.doc DOC document
J_-_3_Category_B_Items_ARCTIC.xls XLS spreadsheet
N3220518R4256_USNS_ARCTIC_MTA_SOLICITATION.docx DOCX document
J_-_12_Past_Performance_Data.doc DOC document
J_-_14_Technical_Data_Non-Disclosure.docx DOCX document
JA_N32205-18-R-4256__11_July_2018_Redacted.pdf PDF
J_-_9_Disclosure_of_Lobbying_Activities_SF-LLL.doc DOC document
J_-_14_Technical_Data_Non-Disclosure.docx DOCX document
SYNOPSIS_N32205-18-R-4256_USNS_ARCTIC.docx DOCX document
SOURCES_SOUGHT_FOR_SHIP_REPAIR_ARCTIC_MTA.doc DOC document
Show all 50

USNS ARCTIC Mid-Term Availability has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-15

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION 2:00 PM 28 August 2018 to Ed Ruhling. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Ed Ruhling at edward.ruhling@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Ed Ruhling
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Ed Ruhling

Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Ed Ruhling
(Facsimile Number)(757) 443-0733
(E-mail Address)edward.ruhling@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it.