J-13_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS LARAMIE (T-AO 203) FY19 ROH
Solicitation number
N3220518R4007
Issued by

About this file

J-13 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
J-2_Category_A_Items_Rev_D.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220518R4007-0004.docx DOCX document
J-2_Category_A_Items_Rev_C.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220518R4007-0003.docx DOCX document
J-2_Category_A_Items_Rev_B.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0002.docx DOCX document
18R4007_RFC_001_RESPONSE_WI_609_RESCUE_BOAT.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_011_WI_504_Response.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_012.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_006_RESPONSE_WI_504_Distiller_Dwgs.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_005_RESPONSE_WI_304_Control_Cabinet.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_003_RESPONSE_WI_102_UHP.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_008_RESPONSE_WI_201_ENGINE_COMPONENTS.doc DOC document
N3220518R4007_Amendment_001.pdf PDF
18R4007_RFC_002_Resp_WI_511_OWS.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_007_RESPONSE_WI_908_Stern_Tube_Seal.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_009_RESPONSE_WI_906_Sea_Valves.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_010_RESPONSE__WI_911_Cathodic_Protection.doc DOC document
18R4007_RFC_004_RESPONSE_WI_111_REACH_RODS.doc DOC document
JA_N10418R4007_USNS_LARAMIE_ROH_2019_rev_B.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0015.pdf PDF
J-10_Interport_Differential.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-004.pdf PDF
2019_INDEX_ROH.doc DOC document
J-8_RFC.doc DOC document
J-3_CAT_B.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL,_SWI-0024.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0014.pdf PDF
J-15_Non-Mariner_Maintenance_Contractor_Vetting_Sheet_(Rev_8_(v4)_20_Sep_2017).pdf PDF
J-14_Technical_NDA.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0023.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0011.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0019.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0021.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0022.pdf PDF
18R4007_Solicitation.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-005.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0017.pdf PDF
J-9_Disclsr_Lobbying_Activities_SF-LLL.doc DOC document
CDRL,_SWI-0018.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0012.pdf PDF
J-7_MSC_Ship_Repair_Facility_Survey.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0016.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-0020.pdf PDF
J-4_LARAMIE_2019_ROH.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-2_Category_A_Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-11_Dry_Dock_Evaluation_Form.docx DOCX document
CDRL,_SWI-006.pdf PDF
CDRL,_SWI-001.pdf PDF
J_-_12_Past_Performance_Data.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors) e.) Cost Controls (Cost Contracts Only)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION to Steven S. Blair. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention Steven S. Blair at steven.s.blair1@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Steven S. Blair
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Steven S. Blair

Bldg SP-64 471 East C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Steven S. Blair
(Facsimile Number)(757) 341-2281
(E-mail Address)steven.s.blair1@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it.