LCS_RFP_Amendment_0003.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 02:00 PM local time 20 Dec 2017

X

A

X B

X C X D

EX

X

G

F 94 - 112

113 - 130

X H 131 - 137 charles.r.fields2@navy .mil

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

UNRATED 1 137

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N00421 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 3 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and

47060 Liljencrantz Rd Blg 433 conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

CHARLES R. FIELDS 301-757-4544

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

1 - 7

8 - 15

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

16 - 42

43 - 44

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

45 - 47

48 - 51 X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 52 - 55 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 56 - 68 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS

PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS

69 - 92

PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AD-PAX

2.5.1.2 - BLDG 433

47060 LILJENCRANTZ RD

PATUXENT RIVER MD 20670 301-342-2186

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.

1300550641

5. DATE ISSUED

08 Nov 2017

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N00421-16-R-0072

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

GOVERNMENT POINT OF CONTACT

Charles R. Fields

301-757-4544

Charles.r.fields2@navy.mil

Kristen W. Ferro

301-342-0627

Kristen.ferro@navy.mil

Thomas W. Conrow

301-342-2186

Thomas.conrow@navy.mil

GENERAL INFORMATION

Notes

The NAICS code for this effort is 541330 – Engineering Services with a size standard of $38.5M.

1. Both completion and term task orders will be issued under this single award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite

Quantity (IDIQ) contract. NAVAIR clause 5252.211-9503 LEVEL OF EFFORT (COST

REIMBURSEMENT) (NAVAIR) (DEC 2012) will be included in applicable task orders.

2. This solicitation is, and the resulting contract will be, subject to the Service Contract Act (SCA) of 1965, as amended, and to FAR clause 52.222-41 SERVICE CONTRACT LABOR STANDARDS (MAY 2014), contained in Section I of this solicitation. The cost/price proposal shall demonstrate compliance with the minimum monetary wages and fringe benefits for service employees as specified in the Wage

Determinations (provided as an attachment in Section J of this solicitation). The following Wage

Determinations may be applicable for this effort:

a. WD 15-4279 (Rev.-3) revised 7/25/2017 for St. Mary’s County, Maryland

b. WD 15-4539 (Rev.-3) revised 7/25/2017 for Duval County, Florida

c. WD 15-4341 (Rev.-6) revised 7/25/2017 for Chesapeake County, Virginia

d. WD 15-4377 (Rev.-3) revised 7/25/2017 for Cumberland County, North Carolina

e. WD 15-5635 (Rev.-6) revised 8/3/2017 for San Diego County, California

f. WD 15-4531 (Rev.-4) revised 7/25/2017 for Okaloosa County, Florida

g. WD 15-5229 (Rev.-3) revised 8/3/2017 for El Paso County, Texas

h. WD 15-5539 (Rev.-5) revised 8/3/2017 for Pierce County, Washington

3. FAR clause 52.222-17 NONDISPLACEMENT OF QUALIFIED WORKERS (MAY 2014) requires successor contractors to give the right of first refusal to all qualified service employees (within the meaning of SCA) that were performing in the proposed positions under the predecessor contract. The Offeror’s proposal shall demonstrate compliance with FAR 22.12 and 52.222-17. If the offeror is proposing the incumbent workforce based on FAR 52.222-17 for SCA labor categories, the proposed employee should be identified as:

a. Current – if the Offeror is the incumbent contractor

b. Contingent – of the Offeror has a letter of intent in place with the employee

c. Prospective – if the Offeror does not know the identity of the incumbent employee

4. The Product Service Code (PSC) for this procurement is J058 – Installation of Equipment –

Communication, Detection, and Coherent Radiation Equipment.

5. This contract will have a five (5)-year ordering period.

6. The contractor will be required to have TOP SECRET facility clearance and TOP SECRET and/or

SECRET clearance for personnel identified in Section C Performance Work Statement (PWS)/Statement of

Work (SOW) paragraph 12.6 within sixty (60) days of contract award. Interim clearances are acceptable.

The contractor will not be permitted access to classified information until a final DD254 is incorporated as an attachment to the contract award.

mailto:Charles.r.fields2@navy.mil mailto:Kristen.ferro@navy.mil mailto:Thomas.conrow@navy.mil

AMENDMENTS

AMENDMENT 0001 Changes:

The changes are noted within the Questions & Answers below.

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (AS OF 13 NOVEMBER 2017):

1. Question: Can you provide a date as to when the Attachment P8 titled “Labor Categories/Hours by

Location” will be released?

Answer: The missing attachment, P8, has been posted on FBO today, 13 November 2017, along with this amendment.

2. Question: The attachment P3 is marked “Reserved”- will the Government be releasing this document?

Answer: Attachments are templated and may or may not be applicable to a particular contract.

Attachments P1-P3 are not applicable to this solicitation, and are therefore “Reserved.”

AMENDMENT 0002 Changes:

The changes are noted within the Questions & Answers below.

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (AS OF 15 NOVEMBER 2017):

3. Question: The number of FTEs identified for each FTU and on-site location in Attachment P8 does not match the number of FTEs included for each FTU and on-site location in Sections C.6.1.1.1 and C.6.1.1.2 of Amendment 0001 on pages 18 and 19. Would the Government please issue an amendment to clarify the number of FTEs to be provided per FTU and on-site location at the earliest opportunity so that delays in offeror proposal development can be avoided?

Answer: The number of FTEs in Sections C.6.1.1.1 and C.6.1.1.2, mentioned above, have been removed.

For proposal purposes, please use the number of FTEs identified in Attachment P8.

AMENDMENT 0003 Changes:

The following questions will be addressed in a forthcoming amendment.

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (AS OF 22 NOVEMBER 2017):

4. Question: Section M states a tripwire of $300K annually, but Attachment P7 contains fully burdened functional labor rates on an hourly basis that are below $156 per hour. Will the Government clarify which trip wire(s) is applicable to this solicitation?

5. Question: In rows 20-26 of attachment P8, the labor categories listed are Engineering Technician, Engineering Technician I, and Engineering Technician II. However, in Section C of the solicitation, the labor qualifications lists Engineering Technicians I, II, and III. Should the P8 labor categories match the labor categories listed in Section C?

6. Question: Can the Government confirm that on row 76 of attachment P8, the Government intends to have 3 Manager/Operations Manager Senior by year 5 of the contract?

7. Question: Can the Government confirm that on row 78 of attachment P8, the Government intends to have 1 Manager/Operations Manager Senior throughout the life of the contract?

8. Question: For NAVAIR clause 5252.209-9510 Organizational Conflicts of Interest (Services), paragraph (e), will the Government confirm that the checked paragraphs (#’s 1-6) are the applicable OCI provisions to this solicitation and the basis for the list provided in

Attachment 09 of the solicitation?

9. Question: In addition, the clause does not appear to include Advisory and Assistance Services (AAS) as a relevant conflict of interest within this solicitation. While it is understood that not all AAS activities create conflicts of interest, would the Government be willing to consider those AAS services which provide exposure to proprietary financial data (inclusive of labor rates) for competitors within the industry a relevant conflict of interest based on potential competitive advantage?

10. Question: In reviewing the solicitation, there does not appear to be any Payment Guidance Instruction

(PGI) clauses incorporated. Given the importance of these clauses and their instructions to DFAS on how to disburse the funds on the awarded contract, will the Government provide PGI clause(s) it intends to incorporate into the awarded contract?

11. Question: Section L, Part B, paragraph 1.3.3.1 states that “All goals shall be presented in both dollars and percentages in relation to the total contract value.” Given the direction outlined at the beginning of

Section L, Part B that states “Cost or pricing information shall only appear in the Price/Cost volume,” does the Government want the goals presented in dollars within Volume 1?

12. Question: Section L, Part B, paragraph 3.5.2 states “For proposal purposes, when Danger Pay has been identified in Attachment P8, the Offeror shall base Danger Pay on a travel location in Kuwait.” Since the

Department of State and Department of Defense do not have the same pay differentials for Kuwait, will the

Government clarify which department should be used for pricing purposes?

13. Question: Attachment P8 identifies SCA positions and includes hours for straight time, overtime and danger pay. These positions are identified to be located at CONUS locations. With the inclusion of danger pay, specified to be Kuwait, it implies these positions are not CONUS positions but actually OCONUS positions working extended hours. Will the Government please confirm where these SCA positions will actually be performing their duties if extended work weeks are what the Government is requesting? Please elaborate on how the government expects these positions to be performed.

14. Question: Given the width of Attachment P6 Cost Summary Format and required 1 inch margins, would the government consider increasing the page size for the Cost Summary Format to 11 x 17 inch paper with 1 inch margins?

15. Question: The Attachment P6 Cost Summary Format includes a pass-through analysis table at the bottom of each tab. This states “When analyzing pass through costs, the Government will consider prime offeror fee on subcontractor price as an element of pass through as explained in the Section H Savings

Clause of the MACs. In Section B, however, prime offeror fee on subcontractor price is a fee element rather than a cost element. Prime offeror fee on subcontractor price should be included in the fee column

(rather than the cost column) of Section B.” There is no Savings Clause in Section H and there is no MAC associated with this solicitation. Will the government remove the pass-through section of the Attachment

P6?

16. Question: The Attachment P6 Cost Summary Format has embedded algorithms related to Seaport proposals that limit fee percentage. Can these be removed since this is not a Seaport bid and considering the solicitation is only subject to the limitation set in FAR 15-404-4(c)(4)(i)?

17. Question: Attachment 6 Cost Summary Format contains columns for a Base Period plus 5 Option

Periods which is effectively six periods when there are only five periods (or years) identified in Attachment

P8. Is the offeror permitted to remove the extra period as long as care is taken to ensure integrity of formulas?

18. Question: Attachment P7 Fully Burdened Labor Rates references NAVAIR Clause 5252.232-9529

(Incurred Cost Reproting and Progress Reporting for Services) which is not incorporated into the solicitation. Will the government remove this reference?

19. Question: The instructions in Attachment P7 Fully Burdened Labor Rates contains a column for

Proposed Labor Category (column B) and another for Functional Area Labor Category (column D). Given there is not a separate set of functional names furnished by the government for the labor categories to be proposed, will the government confirm the offeror is to provide the same labor category title in columns B and D?

20. Question: Instructions in cell C10 for columns J-N of Attachment P7 references a tab titled “Functional

Labor Hrly Tripwire,” but it is absent from the workbook. Will the government provide this tab?

21. Question: Within Attachment P8 Labor Categories Hours by Location, would the government identify which FTEs will be government site and which will be contractor site?

22. Question: Attachment P8, rows 20 and 21, reference a non-leveled Engineering Technician labor category which is not defined in Section C.

Would the government update Attachment P8 with the desired level of Engineering Technician?

23. Question: The RFP issued on 8 Nov 2017 contained in Section 6.1 “Special Facilities – Field

Technical Units” with a sub-section 6.1.1.1 containing “possible FTU sites.” The table included

Government FTU location of NAS Patuxent River, Webster Field Annex St. Inigoes, MD and a Contractor

FTU at the same site. It was presumed that the Contractor FTU location was to be interpreted as “within St.

Inigoes area.” RFP Amendment 2 delets FTU table, and refers offerors to the Attachment P8. The

Attachment P8 reflects California, MD site and Webster Field, MD site. While there are no designations for

Government FTU and Contractor FTU in the P8, it is assumed Califronia, MD site is the Contractor FTU.

Is the designation of California, MD as the Contractor FTU site as a firm requirement, or is this a general location that includes other localities such as Lexington Park, MD or Great Mills, MD?

24. Question: The RFP issued on 8 Nov 2017 contained Section 6.1 “Special Facilities-Field Technical

Units: with a subsection 6.1.1.2 containing “locations where contractor may provide on-site support” and included Camp Lejeune, NC. RFP Amendment2 deleted the 6.1.1.2 table, and refers offerors to Attachment

P8. Attachment P8 does not include Camp Lejeune, NC; however, it is understood that current SCMS LCS support includes Camp Lejeune.

Will the Government confirm that Camp Lejeune is not identified as a location where the contractor may provide on-site support?

25. Question: The Government requires compliance with 52.222-17 NONDISPLACEMENT OF

QUALIFIED WORKERS and for offerors to address this requirement in the proposal.

Please advise if this requirement should be addressed in Volume III, Price/Cost.

Additionally, will the Government provide the list of names of all service employees working under this contract and its subcontracts?

How will the Government evaluate compliance with this clause in proposal?

26. Question: Both Section A and Attachment 03 include WD Schedule 2015-4539 for Duval County, FL.

Duval County is not identified as a possible work location in Section C or Attachment P8.

Will the government remove references to the Duval County WD in Section A and Amendment 03?

27. Question: Clause 5252.211-9503 LEVEL OF EFFORT (COST REIMBURSEMENT) (NAVAIR)

(DEC 2012) provides overall LOE.

Should offerors propose LOE defined in the RFP or can offerors deviate?

28. Question: The Composite Fully Burdened Rates table headers indicate Years 1 through 5 each as spanning a five year range.

Will the government update the table to clarify periods for Years 1 through 5 for estimating purposes?

29. Question: 5.2.1 states “Support the Government in the procurement of equipment and material. Support the Government in researching, analyzing, and providing recommendations via market research per Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 10 to determine sources capable of satisfying the Government’s requirements.”

Please advise if contractors are providing input for the source justifications or if contractor’s are writing source justifications?

30. Question: Page 17 states that five FTUs are to be provided by the contractor.

Would a facility provided by a subcontractor meet this requirement?

31. Question: Afghanistan is listed as a potential location whether the contractor may need to travel.

If contractors will be required to deploy to hazardous locations, will the government provide a separate

ODC CLIN for uplifts, travel and other life support required?

32. Question: This paragraph states “…the contractor shall provide all government site employees’ desk top computers to conduct daily work…” Historically, many DoD contracts that require contractors at

Government sites to have access to Government IT systems designate the cost of the computer lease/purchase to be cost-reimbursable to the contract and provide for the contractor to procure the assets from the same vendor source as the government for standardization and cost efficiencies.

Will the Government identify the cost of the required desktop computers as a cost reimbursable ODC?

33. Question: Sections C.12.1 and C.12.5 both show the labor category “Computer and Information

Research Scientist Junior” mapped to SOC code 15-1221 but that code does not correspond with an existing BLS SOC Code.

Would the government please provide updated mapping?

34. Question: Sections C.12.1 and C.12.5 both show the labor category “Computer Systems Analyst” mapped to SOC code 15-1211 but that code does not correspond with an existing BLS SOC Code.

Would the government please provide updated mapping?

35. Question: Key Personnel table identifies a quantity of 1 in the Total FTEs column for the

Manager/Operation Manager labor category. Attachment P8, Location: California, MD, identifies 1 FTE in

Year 1, increasing by .5 FTE each successive year to total 3 FTEs in Year 5.

Will the Government revise Sect 12.2 or the Attachment P8 to resolve the conflicting information?

36. Question: 5252.209-9510 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (SERVICES)

(NAVAIR)(MAR 2007) – there are blanks in this clause.

Will the Government please complete?

37. Question: If an offeror is submitting a Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan please add DFARS

252.219-7004 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Test Program).

38. Question: FAR 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper MAY

2011 - This clause is incorporated by reference in RFP Section I. Section L.2 Proposal Format does not mention requirements for recycled paper and double-sided printing.

Please confirm that FAR 52.204-4 applies and that offerors shall submit the printed, hardcopy proposal in double-sided format on recycled paper, and also update/revise Section L.2.0 to reflect the requirement.

39. Question: The solicitation includes the following attachments (also listed in Section J).

Attachment 6 SB Subcontracting Plan

Attachment 07 List of Key Personnel

Attachment 08 List of Approved Subcontractors

Attachment 09 OCI List

Please confirm that the attachments listed above are place holders for use once the contract is awarded and that there is no requirement to include with the proposal submission.

40. Question: 1.3.3 Small Business Utilization Strategy. 1.3.3.1 Small Business Utilization Strategy. The

RFP states “…All goals shall be presented in both dollars and percentages in relation to total contract value…”

Since cost-related information is normally not included within a Technical Proposal, please confirm that offerors are to include this cost information in Volume 2 Technical. If not in Volume 2, please provide instructions on where to include the information.

41. Question: 1.3.3.2 Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The RFP states “The Large Business Offeror shall provide its SB Subcontracting Plan conforming to the requirements of FAR 19.7 and DFARS 219.7 as

Annex 2, unless there is an already approved comprehensive SB Plan.”

Would the Government clarify if a large business offeror which has an already approved comprehensive

Small Business Subcontracting Plan should submit its plan as Annex 2 or if a large business offeror with an already approved comprehensive Plan should include a statement in the proposal that it has an approved

Plan and not submit its approved Plan in Annex 2.

42. Question: Section L 2.0 Proposal Format indicates the electronic copy of proposal files should be compatible with MS 2010 or the latest Adobe Acrobat reader on CD-ROM. RFP Attachment P4, Past

Performance Information Form is an Adobe Form.

Please clarify, in Section L, if the offeror’s Attachment P4 response should be submitted in Word or PDF format. If in PDF format. If PDF format, please confirm that the P4 submission is excluded from the requirement for 1 in margins and 12 point Times New Roman font. If PDF format, does the government want the Form(s) combined into a single PDF file, or submitted as individual PFD files for each reference?

When printed, the P4 form fields truncate the information entered. Can the government provide a P4 form with expandable text fields so that the entire response prints?

3.0 Proposal Content and Volumes lists the Volume 2 page limit as 10 pages.

Please confirm that each completed P4 can exceed 2 pages (not to exceed 10 pages for the entire response).

Request that the Volume 2 Past Performance page limit be modified to include 1 page so that offeror’s have space to address other Past Performance requirements – the subcontractor letter(s) of commitment and RFP

Attachment 5P.

43. Question: Page 121 states that subcontractors and team members may provide information regarding their indirect rates separately or included in the offeror’s submission.

Would the government consider revising this requirement to only apply to subcontractors with cost type subcontracts?

44. Question: The government has stated, “If the Offeror’s proposed employees are under a collective bargaining agreement, the Offeror shall provide a copy of the agreement.”

Would the government please clarify the existence of or anticipation of collective bargaining agreements associated with the award of this contract or any previously awarded contract associated with this solicitation?

If work performed under the contract includes employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement please provide the collective bargaining agreement.

45. Question: Section L Part B paragraph 3.5.2 Labor Hours states “The Government estimate is 1,012,800 hours for the entire work effort, inclusive of options,” which through the Option to Extend Services and

Option to Extend the Term of Contracts clauses in Section I, could potentially include up to a 6 month extension. The total hours in Attachment P8 is also 1,012,800, but only accounts for Years 1 – 5 and does not appear to include hours for a possible contract extension. Will the government revise the language in

Section L?

46. Question: Section L directs the offeror to base Danger Pay in Attachment 8 on a travel location in

Kuwait. The Department of State website does not list Kuwait as an eligible location for danger pay.

Would the government please clarify what offerors shall use as a basis of estimate for Danger Pay?

47. Question: Page 112 states that one container shall include “all Original Proposal volumes including the original/signed documents submitted as part of Volume 3 Cost/Price.”

Does the government require signed original signature pages?

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

B-1 COMPOSITE RATES

B-1 COMPOSITE RATES

This language is designed for use in conjunction with H-2 Issuance of Orders Using Streamlined Procedures

NAVAIR 5252.216-9540 (Variation) (May 2017). For purposes of estimating and establishing a labor cost ceiling for each task order, the following composite rates will be used by multiplying the composite rate for the labor category by the estimated hours for each labor category. These rates are estimates, and invoicing will be based on actual costs incurred. Ceiling for ODCs will be priced in accordance with the Government Estimate. Orders crossing multiple years will be estimated by the Government using the composite rates for each year in proportion to the period of performance of the order.

Labor Category (* =

Key)

Composite Fully Burdened Rates

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

07/30/2018-

07/29/2023**

07/30/2018-

07/29/2023**

07/30/2018-

07/29/2023**

07/30/2018-

07/29/2023**

07/30/2018-

07/29/2023**

General and

Operations Manager, Junior

General and

Operations Manager, Journeyman*

Manager/Operations

Manager, Senior*

First-Line

Supervisors of

Production and

Operating Workers, Journeyman

Logistician, Junior

Logistician, Logistician, Senior*

Computer Network

Support Specialist, Support Specialist, Electrical Engineer, Senior*

Program/Project

Analyst, Junior

Program/Project

Analyst, Journeyman

Computer Hardware

Engineer, Junior

Computer Hardware

Engineer, Computer Systems

Analyst, Junior

Computer Systems

Analyst, Journeyman

Computer and

Information Research

Scientist, Junior

Architects, Junior

Architects, Drafter/CAD

Operator I, SCA

Drafter/CAD

Operator II, SCA

Electronics

Technician I, SCA

Technician II, SCA

Technician III, SCA

Engineering

Technician I, SCA

Technician II, SCA

Technician III, SCA

Secretary II, SCA

Material Coordinator, SCA

Video Teleconference

Technician, SCA

Technical Writer I, Technical Writer II, Technical Instructor, Technical

Instructor/Course

Developer, SCA

Warehouse Specialist

(Warehouse Worker), Word Processor II, Word Processor III, Telecommunications

Mechanic, SCA

*Indicates Key Personnel (1 Person)

**Dates to be adjusted at contract award

B-2 NOT SEPARATELY PRICED CLIN

CLINs 0002-0005 and 0008-0011 are Not Separately Priced on the base IDIQ contract. These CLINs will be separately priced on the individual task orders dependent upon the types of funding that will be applied on the task order.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 Lot

CPFF Labor Ceiling for CLINs 0002-0005

CPFF

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) Labor Ceiling for CLINs 0002-0005 in accordance with Performance Work Statement (PWS)/Statement of Work

(SOW) Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3.

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: 1300550641

ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

O&M Funding - CPFF Tasking

CPFF Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Funding in support of PWS/SOW

Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3. Not Separately Priced from CLIN 0001

Procurement Funding - CPFF Tasking

CPFF Procurement Funding in support of PWS/SOW Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3.

Not Separately Priced from CLIN 0001

Working Capital Fund (WCF)-CPFF Tasking

CPFF WCF Funding in support of PWS/SOW Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3. Not

Separately Priced from CLIN 0001

Non-DoD Funding - CPFF Tasking

CPFF Non-Department of Defense (DoD) Funding in support of PWS/SOW

Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3. Not Separately Priced from CLIN 0001.

ITEM

NO

SUPPLIES/SERVICES AMOUNT

0006 Data in support of CLINs 0001-0011

NSP

Data in support of CLINs 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0007, 0008, 0009, 0010 & 0011

0007 Lot ODC Ceiling - CLINs 0008-0011

COST

Other Direct Costs (ODC) in support of CLIN 0001 in accordance with

PWS/SOW Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3.

Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Funding

COST

O&M Funding - ODCs. Not Separately Priced from CLIN 0007.

Procurement Funding

COST

Procurement Funding - ODCs. Not Separately Priced from CLIN 0007.

Working Capital Fund (WCF) Funding

COST

WCF Funding - ODCs. Not Separately Priced from CLIN 0007.

Non-Department of Defense (DoD) Funding

COST

Non-DoD Funding - ODCs. Not Separately Priced from CLIN 0007.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

5252.211-9503 LEVEL OF EFFORT (COST REIMBURSEMENT) (NAVAIR)(DEC 2012)

(a) The level of effort estimated to be ordered during the term of this contract is 1,012,800 man-hours of direct labor including authorized subcontract labor, if any. The contractor shall not, under any circumstances, exceed one hundred (100%) percent of the total level of effort specified in this basic contract. The estimated composition of the total man-hours of direct labor by classification is as follows:

CLIN 0001 Total

Labor Hours 1,012,800

(b) FAR Clause 52.232-20, "Limitation of Cost" applies to fully funded orders and FAR Clause 52.232-22, "Limitation of Funds" applies to incrementally funded orders. Nothing in this clause amends the rights or responsibilities of the parties hereto under either of those two clauses. In addition, the notifications required by this clause are separate and distinct from any specified in either FAR Clause 52.232-20 or FAR Clause 52.232-22.

(c) In the event that less than one hundred (100%) percent of the established level of effort of the contract/order is actually expended by the end of the performance period, the Government shall have the option of:

(1) Requiring the Contractor to continue performance, subject to the provisions of the FAR Clause 52.232-20 or

52.232-22, as applicable, until the effort expended equals 100% of the established Level of Effort; or

(2) Effecting a reduction in the fixed fee by the percentage by which the total expended man-hours is less than one hundred (100%) percent of the established Level of Effort.

(d) The contractor agrees that effort performed in fulfillment of level of effort obligations under this contract shall include only verifiable effort in direct support of the work specified. It shall not include efforts such as work performed in transit to or from an employee's usual workplace, work during lunchtime activities, or effort performed at other non-work locations.

(e) In performing the contract/order, the contractor may use any reasonable combination of hours for the labor categories in support of section C of this contract/order.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

ATTACHMENT B

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT/STATEMENT OF WORK for LIFE CYCLE SUPPORT (LCS)

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD) Special

Communications Mission Solutions (SCMS) Division, located at St. Inigoes, MD, integrates, delivers, and sustains products for Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance, and

Reconnaissance (C5ISR) systems. SCMS provides in-service engineering for C5ISR systems onboard small and large craft, commercial and militarized vehicles, transit cases, mobile communications, fixed base stations, command centers and intelligence systems. These C5ISR products are funded by a broad range of customers including Navy, Special Operations Forces (SOF), Homeland Security, and other Department of Defense (DoD) and non-DoD agencies. To sustain these products, the SCMS Division maintains subject matter expertise in a broad range of technical and programmatic disciplines associated with in-service logistical support, training, and engineering. This contract will provide required Life Cycle Support (LCS) technical expertise and deliverables needed to complete each assigned project.

1.1 SCOPE. The contractor shall provide LCS services for the in-service engineering of C5ISR systems. Systems consist of but are not limited to Radio Frequency (RF) communications systems, antenna systems, baseband audio/video data systems, signal routing/patching/monitoring, Communications and Electronic (C-E) remote control, Information Technology (IT), power/signal distribution, Audio Video (AV) and Video Telecommunication (VTC) systems (referred to as systems/subsystems throughout the remainder of this PWS/SOW). This includes legacy and current C5ISR systems and the in-service engineering support, integrated product support and C-E equipment/systems and subsystems training, and technical data and configuration management support of those systems/subsystems.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS The following documents and document sources are provided for reference. Requirements for SCMS Division in-service support to have interoperability among military, civilian, U.S., and foreign users may dictate an adherence to a wide variety of specifications and standards. Department of Defense

(DoD) systems shall adhere to the Joint Technical Architecture (JTA) 2.0 Standards. Non-DoD systems may be governed by numerous commercial, national, or international standards. The standard development organizations listed are not all inclusive and are presented only as representative sources of the technological interface details which may be required by systems supported with this contract. Likewise, the documentation listed is not all-inclusive but is representative of the types of information that may be required for efforts on this contract. Version applicable to contract is the most current at the time of task order award.

Standards, Specifications, Instructions, and Developmental Organizations:

American National Standards Institute (ANSI)

American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) Standards

Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) – International – Standards

Clinger Cohen Act

Department of Defense and/or Military, e.g. DoD-STD and MIL-STD Series

Department of Defense Product Support Manager Guidebook

Department of Defense Logistics Assessment Guidebook

Department of Defense Product Support Business Case Analysis Guidebook

United States Special Operations Command 700-2, MFP-11 Funded Asset Visibility and Accountability

Electronic Industries Association (EIA), e.g. Recommended Standards RS Series

European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI)

Federal, e.g. FED-STD, FIP Series

Federal Communications Commission

Federal Motor Vehicle and Carrier Safety Standard and Regulations

Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE)

International Standards Organization (ISO)

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTELSAT)

International Telecommunications Union (ITU), formerly the CCITT

Joint Technical Architecture (JTA) Current Version

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Television Standards Committee (NTSC)

Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. (SAE) Handbook

Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA)

International Traffic and Arms Regulations (ITAR)

Instructions and Directives:

DoD-DIRECTIVE, 5000 Series

MIL-STD-810G

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS

AND LABORATORY TESTS

MIL-STD-1472 HUMAN ENGINEERING

MIL-STD-31000A Technical Data Package

MIL-HDBK 502A Department of Defense Handbook – Product Support Analysis

MIL-HDBK-61A(SE) Configuration Management Guidance

MIL-STD-882E Department of Defense Standard Practice for Systems Safety

MIL-STD-40051-2A Department of Defense Standard Practice for Technical Manuals

DoD-STD-2106

DEVELOPMENT OF SHIPBOARD INDUSTRIAL

TEST PROCEDURES

NAVSEA S9095-AD-TRQ-

010/TSTP

Total Ship Test Program Manual

NASPAXRIVINST 5100.35 Occupational Safety and Health Program

NAWCADINST 3432.1 NAWC Operations Security Plan

OPNAVINST 3432.1 Operations Security

SECNAVINST 5000.2

Implementation of Defense Acquisition Management Policies, Procedures, Documentation and Reports

USSOCOM 70-1 Acquisition Management System Policy

3.0 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS. The contractor shall provide life cycle support services and incidental supplies as stated under paragraphs 3.1 through 3.3. The contractor organization shall include personnel with firsthand experience and knowledge in C5ISR equipment/systems and subsystems, training, technical data analysis and configuration management. Performance of this work shall be measured in accordance with the Quality Assurance

Surveillance Plan (QASP) or Contract Surveillance Plan (CSP) as appropriate to the resulting task orders. The contractor shall have a DCMA-approved property accountability system. The contractor shall designate a property accountability point of contact at each of the contractor’s facilities. Additionally the contractor shall have DCMA-approved purchasing and accounting systems. Services shall require performance at the contractor’s facilities, Government facilities, or other locations designated by the SCMS Division.

3.1 In-Service & Engineering Support (CLINs 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005). The definition of “in-service” includes both systems/subsystems that are currently in use in the field, as well as systems/subsystems in use during the initial deployment phase. The contractor shall provide services to assess and report on the operational readiness of, and investigate in-service systems/subsystems problems to provide quick fix and long-term solutions. The contractor shall provide engineering support services to analyze technical problems, correct deficiencies and provide engineering layouts and solutions for in-service systems/subsystems. The contractor shall provide assembly, assimilation, verification, and repair services necessary to support in-service systems/subsystems (NAVSEA S9095-

AD-TRQ-010/TSTP). The results of analyses, inspections, verification and associated technical data as a result of systems/subsystems In-Service & Engineering Support shall be delivered in accordance with Exhibit A (CDRLs

A001-A011, A021). The contractor shall:

o Deliver quick-reaction/quick-response support continually.

o Deliver specialized system support teams to react to complex overhaul, upgrade, and operational system/software requirements.

o Analyze in-service systems to determine faults and deliver recommendations for improvement.

o Troubleshoot in-service systems to identify faults and recommendations for repair.

o Engineer and outline systems/subsystems and components necessary for optimization or repair of in-service systems.

o Assimilate and verify systems/subsystems and components necessary in support of in-service equipment/systems and subsystems technical problems.

o Provide specialized technical system support teams to effect complex overhauls which may include repair, upgrade, maintenance, or training based on system operational requirements.

o Establish Field Technical Units (FTUs) per PWS/SOW paragraph 6.1.

3.1.1 Inspect failed parts, equipment and systems/subsystems to identify specific interfaces or operational deficiencies and repair applicable systems. Perform system/subsystem and equipment level preventive and/or corrective maintenance activities.

3.1.2 Receive, inspect, and perform Stage 1 through Stage 7 production verification (DoD-STD-2106) for equipment and materials.

3.1.3 Analyze, optimize, and make recommendations and/or report on equipment performance and maintenance data of systems/subsystems being mounted or installed into platforms such as: military or commercial ships or boats, military or commercial fixed or rotary wing aircraft, military or commercial shore-based platforms and facilities, and military or commercial vehicles.

3.1.4 Simulate the operation of components to perform systems, subsystems, equipment integration verifications, electronic modeling, simulation, and animation.

3.1.5 Validate systems/subsystems equipment performance and reliability, maintainability, and availability data to prepare and recommend new performance baselines.

3.1.6 Build and integrate modified or upgraded systems/subsystems hardware/software/firmware and user interfaces following the GPLs approved specifications, configuration layouts, Engineering Change Requests

(ECRs), craft alterations, or Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs).

3.1.7 Provide and deliver electronic reporting of all maintenance actions, repair part utilization and stock status, RAM data, and historical information for review and analysis by the COR. Enter all actions into government provided automated database.

3.1.8 Make recommendations on system/subsystem production, installation, layouts, processes, procedures and documentation.

3.1.9 Customize and deliver new performance baselines based on the data analyzed and documented. Resolve or repair any causalities or deficiencies from data and system/subsystem analysis.

3.1.10 Customize and deliver adaptive engineering solutions and/or modifications to systems/subsystems and electronic equipment to meet, urgent and non-urgent, operational requirements.

3.1.11 Draft and validate proposed system engineering modifications and/or upgrades as well as investigating emerging technologies.

3.1.12 Analyze system operational readiness, maintenance data, and validate new technology to provide recommended layout revisions or incorporation of state-of-the-art technology to enable the Government to determine cost-effectiveness and readiness.

3.1.13 Build, fabricate, and integrate equipment, interface units and test fixtures.

3.1.14 Prepare system validations to ensure correct operation, compatibility with existing subsystems and equipment, and suitability for integration into the specified systems/subsystems.

3.1.15 Arrange for special system verification, such as shock, vibration and TEMPEST on systems/subsystems in accordance with military and commercial standards as specified by the GPL.

3. 2 Integrated Product Support (IPS) & Systems (CLINs 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005). The contractor shall deliver management support for acquisition and life cycle planning for in-service and modified systems/ subsystems. The contractor shall deliver systems/subsystem training to fleet, aircraft, ground mobile personnel and in-service field users in areas designated by the GPL. Formal classroom and on-the-job training shall be performed by the contractor.

Required plans and associated reports resulting from analyses, and training documentation shall be delivered in accordance with Exhibit A (CDRLs A001, A006, & A008). The contractor shall:

o Draft recommendations on implementation of various IPS elements such as:

o System Interface o Product Support Management o Sustaining Engineering o Supply Support o Maintenance Planning and Management o Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T) o Technical Data o Support Equipment o Training and training support o Manpower and Personnel o Facilities and Infrastructure o Computer Resources

3.2.1 Customize and deliver logistics plans to ensure sustainability and continually improve product affordability throughout the systems’/subsystems’ lifecycle. This strategy shall be updated during the product’s life cycle as a result of changes in technology and requirements.

3.2.2 Review systems/subsystems program logistic policies and procedures before implementation to ensure they comply with applicable standards, directives, and instructions.

3.2.3 Analyze required readiness levels of systems/subsystems ensuring logistics factors associated with achieving required readiness levels are addressed.

3.2.4 Customize and deliver tailored supportability strategies which describes IPS requirements, tasks, and milestones to be accomplished during current and succeeding phases of the program.

3.2.5 Define, customize, and/or document appropriate maintenance plans to ensure efficient system/subsystem maintenance using maintenance planning concepts such as:

o Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM).

o Condition-Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+).

o Total Ownership Cost (TOC).

3.2.6 Deliver supportability analyses and recommend strategies to ensure cost efficient support for systems. Perform analyses such as:

o Failure Mode.

o Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA).

o Fault Tree Analysis (FTA).

o Reliability Centered Maintenance Analysis (RCMA).

o Diminishing Manufacturing Sources Material Shortages (DMSMS).

o Reliability and Maintainability (R&M).

o Level Of Repair Analysis (LORA).

o Maintenance Task Analysis.

3.2.7 Perform customization efforts that are concurrent with the system layout so that Integrated Logistics Support

(ILS) options and trade-offs can be considered before the layout is frozen, and the optimum balance of logistics support elements can be achieved.

3.2.8 Prepare and update training plans, course materials, quick reference guides, and materials for required system/subsystem training.

3.2.8.1 Deliver in-service systems/subsystems training courses: curriculums, web based training aides, and documentation for personnel based on training packages provided by the Government or commercial sources.

3.2.8.2 Define a course curriculum based on identified train the trainer and user training requirements.

3.2.8.3 Provide course material for all trainers and class participants.

3.2.8.4 Prepare a comprehensive user package to include the training plan and materials, quick reference guides, component manuals, and system warranty information.

3.2.8.5 Conduct in-house, on-site, and ad-hoc training as required to support SCMS Division user training needs.

3.2.8.6 Develop an operation and maintenance procedures for the system/subsystem. Provide support for identification of an operations and maintenance infrastructure to satisfy the organization and system operational and mission requirements.

3.2.8.7 Deliver on-the-job system/subsystem training when updating or maintaining equipment as directed by the

Government.

3.2.8.8 Prepare, maintain, and deliver training plans, incorporating data received from manufacturers or as a result of engineering upgrades and improvements.

3.2.9 Provide the user receiving system/subsystem support with final user guides, source code, manuals, drawings, equipment list, and warranty information.

3.3 Technical Data & Configuration Management (CLINs 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006). The contractor shall prepare and maintain Configuration Management Planning for systems/subsystems using SCMS Division furnished criteria and configuration control of technical data. These plans shall prescribe the policies and procedures for identifying and controlling hardware, software, and documentation for each system. Required technical data shall be delivered in accordance with Exhibit A. (CDRLs A001, A004, A007, and A011-A012). The contractor shall:

3.3.1 Deliver technical and planning analysis and track centrally managed activities related to LCS responsibilities.

3.3.2 Deliver program planning and control, cost and schedule management, quality assurance management, risk management and Contract data management documentation and support.

3.3.3 Maintain/update physical configuration records for reviews and audits.

3.3.4 Deliver engineering analysis for layout changes to implement solutions, technical improvements, and mandated system upgrades.

3.3.5 Prepare, coordinate, and review Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) and other configuration documentation for submission of recommended changes to the technical documentation.

3.3.6 Review ECPs for technical accuracy and present ECPs at change control board (CCB) meetings and related technical reviews with SCMS Division technical personnel.

3.3.7 Track ECP requests through the configuration control process, and attend configuration control board and related meetings when scheduled.

3.3.8 Draft, update, correct, maintain, prepare, revise, and deliver operation and maintenance manuals, installation guides, technical manuals, and system technical documentation.

3.3.9 Draft, update, correct, and revise engineering drawings and packages.

4.0 REPORTS. The contractor shall provide the following reports:

4.1 Technical Progress Report to be delivered in accordance with CDRL A013.

4.2 Task Order Close-Out to be delivered in accordance with CDRL A014.

4.3 Financial Progress Report to be delivered in accordance with CDRL A015.

4.4 Workforce Report to be delivered in accordance with CDRL A019.

4.5 Shipment Tracking Report to be delivered in accordance with CDRL A022.

4.6 Segregation of Costs Report to be delivered in accordance with CDRL A023.

5.0 PROCUREMENT SUPPORT.

5.1 It will be necessary for the contractor to have a material funding allocation to immediately respond to system development requirements, system failures, and system operational requirements. All incidental material purchases will be approved per H-1 Restriction on the Direct Charging of Material NAVAIR 5252.242-9515

(Variation)(October 2017) clause. (CLINs 0007, 0008, 0009, 0010, 0011).

5.2 The contractor shall provide supply procurement tracking support to gather data for equipment and hardware requirements in accordance with efforts performed in PWS/SOW 3.1-3.3 above. Required material reports and analyses shall be delivered in accordance with Exhibit A (CDRLs A021, and A022). The contractor shall not accept any products on behalf of the Government. The contractor shall:

5.2.1 Support the Government in the procurement of equipment and material. Support the Government in researching, analyzing, and providing recommendations via market research per Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR) Part 10 to determine sources capable…