N00253-17-R-0001-0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purposes of this amendment are to answ er vendor questions and revise the solicitation accordingly, to incorporate Attachment 18, Contract Security Requirements, and to extend the closing date and time to 2:00 pm Pacific time on 07 November 2017.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 36

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 30-Oct-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00253-17-R-0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-Sep-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

30-Oct-2017

CODE

NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER

ATTN: GINA.MELOY@NAVY.MIL

610 DOWELL STREET, BLDG 206A

KEYPORT WA 98345

N00253 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00253-17-R-0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

AMENDMENT 0002 VENDOR Q&A

Question 1: The total quantity of the ADC MK 3s to be procured (from FBO) is 396 or ~99/option year. The first two stepladder quantities for ADC MK 3s reflect non-economical production quantities. We propose deleting the quantity 1 - 25 stepladder, and changing the quantity 26 - 50 stepladder to 35 - 50.

Answer 1: The first stepladder bracket is changed to 12 – 25. The other four (4) ADC MK 3 stepladder brackets remain as is.

Question 2: The total quantity of the ADC MK 4s to be procured (from FBO) is 156 or ~39/option year. The first three stepladder quantities for ADC MK 4s reflect non-economical production quantities. We propose deleting the quantity 1 - 12 stepladder, the quantity 13 - 24 stepladder, and the quantity 25 - 36 stepladder, and changing the quantity 37 - 48 stepladder to 35 - 48.

Answer 2: The first stepladder bracket is eliminated, and the second stepladder bracket is changed to 12 – 24. The other three (3) ADC MK 4 stepladder brackets remain as is.

Question 3: We request that NAVSEA Clause HQ C-2-0062 WAIVER OF FIRST ARTICLE REQUIREMENTS (NAVSEA)(SEP 1990) be included in the solicitation.

Answer 3: NAVSEA Clause HQ C-2-0062 WAIVER OF FIRST ARTICLE REQUIREMENTS (NAVSEA)(SEP 1990) has been added to the solicitation in section C.

Question 4: The RFP does not state whether the staffing plan is subject to the technical proposal page limitation. We request that the staffing plan not be subject to the technical proposal page limitation, and allow it to be provided as an appendix, like the Software Development Plan, with no page limitation.

Answer 4: The staffing plan submission requirement is removed from the solicitation sections L and M.

In section L, paragraph 2.2.2 Subfactor 2: Management Approach:

“The Offeror shall submit its staffing plan. The Offeror shall identify all assumptions related to the allocation of labor mixes associated with the SOW and the overall labor mixes proposed for the Engineering Services CLINs.

The labor hours and labor mix provided in the "Staffing Plan" submitted in Attachment 12, Labor Hour Breakdown, shall match exactly the labor hours and labor mix provided in Attachment 13, Cost Summary.”

is changed to:

“The Offeror shall identify all assumptions related to the allocation of labor mixes associated with the SOW and the overall labor mixes proposed for the Engineering Services CLINs. The labor hours and labor mix provided in Attachment 12, Labor Hour Breakdown, shall match exactly the labor hours and labor mix provided in Attachment 13, Cost Summary.”

In section M, paragraph Sub Factor 2: Management Approach:

“The staffing plan will be evaluated for detail and relevance and whether it clearly addresses all requirements and assumptions related to the allocation of labor mixes. The plan will be evaluated to ensure it matches the hours and labor mix in Attachment 12, Labor Hour Breakdown.”

is changed to:

“The Offeror shall identify all assumptions related to the allocation of labor mixes associated with the SOW and the overall labor mixes proposed for the Engineering Services CLINs. The labor hours and labor mix provided in Attachment 12, Labor Hour Breakdown, shall match exactly the labor hours and labor mix provided in Attachment 13, Cost Summary.” Attachment 12, Labor Hour Breakdown is not subject to the page limitation.

Question 5: Which volume should include the Make-Or-Buy Program? We recommend it be included in Volume IV, Cost Proposal.

Answer 5: The Make-or-Buy Program submission requirement is added to section L, paragraph 2.2.1.1, item (h).

In section L, paragraph 2.2.1.1, Manufacturing Plan, item (h) has been added, as follows:

(h) Provide a Make-or-Buy Program in accordance with NAVSEA clause HQ L-2-0004. The Make-or-Buy Program is not subject to the page limitation. The Make-or-Buy Program shall not include any specific cost information.

Costs may be discussed in relative terms only.

Question 6: Section L, Factor 3, Past Performance, paragraph 2 requires that Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) and Summary Subcontracting Reports (SSRs) be submitted as part of Volume II, Past Performance. As these reports contain cost information, we recommend that they be deleted from Volume II, Past Performance, and included in Volume III, Small Business Participation.

Answer 6: The source selection submittal and evaluation requirements in NAVSEA solicitations must follow the format mandated by the Department of Defense Source Selection Guide, and therefore cannot be modified.

In section L, paragraph 1.2.3, Proposal Submission:

“No cost or pricing information shall be included in the Offeror's forwarding letter or in any part of its submitted volumes, except for Volume III - Small Business Participation and Volume IV – Cost Proposal.”

is changed to:

“No cost or pricing information shall be included in the Offeror's forwarding letter or in any part of Volume I - Technical/Management Proposal.”

Question 7: The Past Performance Questionnaire states "List all subcontractors proposed that meet the definition of major subcontractor." Please provide the government's definition of major subcontractor.

Answer 7: The definition of a major subcontractor for the Past Performance Questionnaire is a subcontractor who performed $2,000,000 of work or more per year for the subject project.

In section L, paragraph 3 Volume II – Factor 3: Past Performance, sub-paragraph 1:

“A list of up to five (5) relevant contracts for the Offeror, and up to two (2) relevant contracts for each major subcontractor, that represent similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the efforts described herein. The contracts identified must have been underway for at least six (6) months or longer; and if completed, must have been completed within the past three (3) years. Include the below information about each contract. This information may be provided using Attachment 14, Past Performance Questionnaire.”

is changed to:

“A list of up to five (5) relevant contracts for the Offeror, and up to two (2) relevant contracts for each major subcontractor, that represent similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the efforts described herein. A major subcontractor is defined as a subcontractor that performed $2,000,000 or more per year for the subject project. The contracts identified must have been underway for at least six (6) months or longer; and if completed, must have been completed within the past three (3) years. Include the below information about each contract. This information may be provided using Attachment 14, Past Performance Questionnaire.”

Question 8: CLINs 2006, 3006 & 4006 require Launch Tube Production, in accordance with Drawing No. 6658880 Rev C. The SOW section 3.1.3 Stainless Steel Launch Tube, page 6 states the Contractor shall provide raw launch tubes for Fleet Readiness Center South West (FRC-SW). The stainless steel launch tubes shall be constructed and finished to meet the requirements of NAVSEA drawing 53711-6658881. Drawing 6658880 Rev C is for finished launch tubes, Drawing 6658881 Rev C is for raw launch tubes.

Answer 8: CLINs 2006, 3006 & 4006 should state that Launch Tube Production is to be in accordance with Drawing 6658881 Rev C for raw launch tubes. The CLIN descriptions are revised accordingly.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 1001

The stepladder pricing structure has changed from:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

1001 1001 1.00 25.00

26.00 50.00

51.00 75.00

76.00 100.00

101.00 124.00

To:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

1001 1001 12.00 25.00

26.00 50.00

51.00 75.00

76.00 100.00

101.00 124.00

CLIN 1002

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

1002 1002 13.00 24.00

25.00 36.00

37.00 48.00

49.00 59.00

To:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

1002 1002 12.00 24.00

25.00 36.00

37.00 48.00

49.00 59.00

CLIN 2001

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

2001 2001 1.00 25.00

26.00 50.00

51.00 75.00

76.00 100.00

101.00 124.00

To:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

2001 2001 12.00 25.00

26.00 50.00

51.00 75.00

CLIN 2002

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

2002 2002 13.00 24.00

25.00 36.00

37.00 48.00

49.00 59.00

To:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

2002 2002 12.00 24.00

25.00 36.00

CLIN 2006

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Launch Tube Production, in accordance with Drawing No. 6658880 Rev C, the Statement of Work, and all associated drawings and specifications.

To:

Launch Tube Production, in accordance with Drawing No. 6658881 Rev C, the Statement of Work, and all

CLIN 3001

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

3001 3001 1.00 25.00

26.00 50.00

51.00 75.00

76.00 100.00

101.00 124.00

To:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

3001 3001 12.00 25.00

26.00 50.00

51.00 75.00

CLIN 3002

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

3002 3002 13.00 24.00

25.00 36.00

37.00 48.00

49.00 59.00

To:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

3002 3002 12.00 24.00

25.00 36.00

CLIN 3006

CLIN 4001

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

4001 4001 1.00 25.00

26.00 50.00

51.00 75.00

76.00 100.00

101.00 124.00

To:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

4001 4001 12.00 25.00

26.00 50.00

51.00 75.00

CLIN 4002

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

4002 4002 13.00 24.00

25.00 36.00

37.00 48.00

49.00 59.00

To:

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

4002 4002 12.00 24.00

25.00 36.00

CLIN 4006

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been added by full text:

HQ C-2-0062 WAIVER OF FIRST ARTICLE REQUIREMENTS (NAVSEA) (SEP 1990)

If the First Article is waived by the Government, the Contractor shall deliver supplies that are identical or substantially identical to those previously accepted by the Government under the following contract(s):

(Offeror to fill in contract number(s), as applicable. See Section M)

The Offeror shall propose which portions of First Article Testing should be waived, and provide supporting rationale.

This information may be provided as an addendum to the Technical Proposal, and is not subject to the page limitation.

(End of Text)

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

HQ J-2-0002 STANDARD LANGUAGE FOR CONTRACTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this contract:

As Provided on www.fbo.gov:

Exhibit A: Contract Data Requirements List, DD Form 142, Data Item Numbers A001 through A019 Exhibit B: Contract Data Requirements List, DD Form 142, Data Item Numbers B001 through B017 Exhibit C: Contract Data Requirements List, DD Form 142, Data Item Numbers C001 through C003 Attachment 1: Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254 Attachment 7: TDP Option Selection Worksheet Rev 1, Attachment 1 to CDRL A005 Attachment 8: Government Furnished Information, NAVSEA Form 4340/2 Attachment 9: Consolidated Government Furnished Property Attachment Version 1.0 Attachment 12: Labor Hour Breakdown Attachment 13: Cost Summary

Attachment 14: Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 15: Contractor’s Small Business Participation Commitment Document Attachment 16: Clause Applicability Matrix Attachment 18: Contract Security Requirements

As Provided on www.fbo.gov, accessible to JCP Certified Vendors Only:

Attachment 2: ADC MK 3 Security Classification Guidelines, 05-108.3 Attachment 3: PMS 415 Configuration Management Plan, PMS415-CMP-08-030 Rev F Attachment 4: PMS415-UDWS-IUID-10-069, Item Unique Identification (IUID) Implementation Plan Attachment 6: PMS 415 Program Protection Plan Version 1.0 Supporting Lifecyle Phase: Operations & Support Attachment 10: ADC MK 4 Security Classification Guidelines, 05-101.3 Attachment 11: Statement of Work (SOW)

Classified Documents available by emailing a request to the Government POC listed in this RFP :

Attachment 5: Prime Item Performance Specification for Launcher Assemblies, PMS415-LA-004-PIPS Rev D

May be obtained by emailing a request to gina.meloy@navy.mil. The request must include the company name;

facility security officer name, email address, and phone number; and the CAGE code and mailing address of the facility at which the classified document will be handled. The document will not be provided to anyone without the requisite security clearance (see Attachment 1, Contract Security Classification Specification, DD form 254).

Available online:

Attachment 17: Operations Security Guide for Defense Contractors Available online at: http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/WarfareCenters/NUWCKeyport/Resources.aspx Click on OPSEC Guide for Defense Contractors on the right-hand side.

(End of Text)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. GENERAL

The Government intends to award a contract that results from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal is the most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in Section M of the solicitation. The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government’s interest.

Exchanges with Offerors after receipt of a proposal do not constitute a rejection or counteroffer by the Government.

The Offeror shall submit all information required by this RFP. Proposals that do not comply may be considered nonresponsive and may render the Offeror ineligible for award. The Offeror’s proposal shall be based on the requirements contained in this RFP (including those documents, exhibits, and other attachments to the RFP identified in Section J).

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract upon initial proposals. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms in relation to the evaluation criteria. However, in accordance with the clause FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisition, the Government may contact all or a limited number of Offerors with questions concerning their responses.

Offerors are hereby notified that a competitive range of the most highly rated Offerors may be established for the purposes of efficiency.

The solicitation will be announced on FEDBIZOPPS and will be made available only through the internet at:

https://www.fbo.gov

Offerors are hereby notified that from time to time, the Government may post additional information to the web site relating to this solicitation (e.g. responses to questions, amendments, etc.). It is the Offeror’s responsibility to check the web site for any such information.

It is the Offeror's responsibility to bring to the attention of the Contracting Officer at the earliest possible time, but prior to the closing date, any ambiguities, discrepancies, inconsistencies, or conflicts between the Statement of Work (SOW) and other solicitation documents attached hereto or incorporated by reference. All questions shall be submitted via email to gina.meloy@navy.mil. Only questions transmitted electronically will receive a response.

Offerors are requested to submit written questions within fifteen (15) days after release of the RFP in order to allow the Navy adequate time to prepare and issue responses to all Offerors prior to the date and time set for receipt of proposals. While questions may be submitted up to the time of solicitation closing, the Contracting Officer cannot guarantee those late-submitted questions will be thoroughly answered in advance of closing. It is the Government's intention that questions and responses will be provided via an amendment to the solicitation. Information provided with each question shall include the document name, document date, specific page, paragraph, clause or other definitive citation requiring clarification.

1.1. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

The Factors and Sub Factors for this solicitation are as follows:

Factor 1: Technical

Sub Factor 1: Performance Specification Compliance Sub Factor 2: Corollary Performance Requirement Compliance

Factor 2: Management

Sub Factor 1: Manufacturing Sub Factor 2: Management Approach

Factor 3: Past Performance

Factor 4: Small Business Participation

Factor 5: Evaluated Cost / Price

The solicitation response will be contained in four (4) separate volumes:

Volume I: Technical/Management Volume II: Past Performance Volume III: Small Business Participation Volume IV: Cost Proposal

For each volume, the number of copies required and the page limit are shown in the table below. If a discrepancy exists between the original paper copy of the proposal and the electronic file, the paper copy will take precedence.

All data submitted shall be unclassified.

TABLE 01: COPIES / PAGE LIMITATIONS

Volume/Title Page Limit Original (Paper) Additional Paper Copies

CD-ROM

I. Technical/Management Approach

100 1 4 2

II. Past Performance None 1 2 2 III. Small Business Participation

None 1 2 2

IV. Cost/Price None 1 2 2

1.2. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMISSION

The Offeror must comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposals. Proposals that do not comply may be considered nonresponsive and may render the Offeror ineligible for award. In order to maximize efficiency and minimize the effort involved in the proposal evaluation process, the Offeror shall submit its proposal in accordance with the format presented below.

The cover page for each volume (Technical / Management, Past Performance, Small Business Participation, and Cost Proposal) shall contain:

Volume Number and Title (e.g., Volume I – Technical) Solicitation Number (Request For Proposal (RFP) Number) Company Name, Address, telephone and facsimile numbers, and email address of the Offeror.

DUNS Number and CAGE Code of the Offeror Copy Number

The Technical / Management, Past Performance, Small Business Participation, and Cost volumes shall include the following information, which is not included in the page limit:

No. Description i Title Page ii Table Of Contents iii List Of Figures iv List Of Tables v List Of Appendices vi Glossary Of Abbreviations And Acronyms

The Offeror shall submit the volumes in both paper format and as electronic files. Instructions for paper and electronic files are in Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.2.

Duplicated information within a given factor may be included in full once and by reference thereafter, as long as there is a clear reference to the duplicated information. If the duplicated information is for different evaluation factors, it must be included in full text individually under each factor.

1.2.1. PAPER FORMAT

Each volume shall be bound separately and shall not exceed the page limitation cited. Each volume of the proposal shall be bound in a three ring binder to permit removal of sections, with each major part tabbed. The Offeror’s company name shall appear at the top of each page in the header section. Legibility, clarity, and compliance with the requirements of the solicitation are essential. Failure to provide the requested information may adversely affect the Government’s evaluation of the Offeror. The page count shall include all material with printed matter and figures unless otherwise noted herein.

The material in the Technical / Management Approach, Past Performance, Small Business Participation, and Cost Proposal Volumes of the Offeror’s proposal shall be typed or printed in a font no smaller than size 12 Times New Roman on standard 8-1/2 by 11 inch paper. Text line spacing shall be 1.5 lines. One-inch margins on each side, including top and bottom are required. Text within tables, diagrams, pictorial charts, or graphic material may use Times New Roman 8-point font. Fold out pages may be used for diagrams, charts or graphic material only and may not exceed 11 inches by 17 inches. Fold out pages will be counted as two pages. Unless otherwise specified, fold out pages may only include narrative sufficient to describe the diagram, chart or graphic material. Every paragraph, figure, and table shall be numbered. Proposal material shall be presented on double-sided pages only and in a single column on each page. Each double-sided page counts as 2 pages.

A date corresponding to the date of the initial proposal shall be placed on each page of the proposal in the footer section. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions or correspondence (if required) shall contain revision numbers and dates.

The page count shall include all material with printed matter and figures except (i) title pages, (ii) table of contents,

(iii) lists of figures, (iv) list of tables, (v) list of appendices, (vi) glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, , (vii) Offeror’s cross-referenced matrix to Annex I, (viii) Past Performance Volume, (ix) Small Business Participation Volume, and (x) Cost Proposal Volume.

1.2.2. ELECTRONIC FILES

The electronic files shall be uncompressed and shall be submitted on Compact Disc (CD); text shall be prepared using Microsoft® Word ™ compatible applications; and spreadsheets, worksheets, or workbooks shall be prepared using Microsoft® Excel ™ compatible applications. Electronic files shall only consist of the following extensions:

….doc and/or ….docx for Microsoft® Word 2010™ files, ….xls and/or ….xlsx for Microsoft® Excel 2010™ files ….ppt and/or ….pptx for Microsoft® PowerPoint 2010™ files ….mpp for Microsoft® Project 2007™ files

Electronic files shall be labeled by: a) Contractor Name and b) Title of the document being attached (Example: ABC Inc. – Volume I Technical Proposal Approach, ABC Inc. – Volume V Cost Proposal, etc.). Refer to volume information for specific volumes and titles.

Graphics, tables, photographs, and other data beyond the capability of Microsoft® Word™, Microsoft® PowerPoint™, Microsoft® Excel™, or Microsoft® Project™ may be submitted in Adobe Acrobat version 9.0 format. The information shall be submitted as one (1) volume per CD. Refer to Table 1 for quantities. Each disk shall be labeled as follows:

Solicitation Number: N00253-17-R-0001

Volume #

Offeror Company Name, City, State Offeror POC Offeror POC Phone # Date of Submission

Appropriate Security Classification markings and handling instructions shall be used for all proposals submitted.

Note that electronic files shall be unclassified.

Two complete sets of CDs shall be provided, one marked “MASTER” and the other marked “BACKUP.” The Offeror shall not embed sound or video files into the electronic files. The Offeror shall ensure CDs are virus free.

1.2.3. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

Proposal submission shall be as follows:

All copies of all proposal volumes shall be submitted to the following address at or before the date and time in Block 9 of the Standard Form (SF) 33.

All offers shall be marked as follows:

Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Keyport ATTN: Gina Meloy 610 Dowell Street Keyport WA, 98345

RFP #: N00253-17-R-0001

DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM

Proposals shall not be submitted via fax or email.

No cost or pricing information shall be included in the Offeror's forwarding letter or in any part of Volume I - Technical/Management Proposal. Forwarding letters are merely instruments for transmitting the submitted proposals; they are not part of the page count and will not be evaluated.

Although legible, neat, orderly, and comprehensive proposal(s) are required, elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective explanation are not desired. Elaborate artwork, expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired.

The proposal shall contain all of the pertinent information in sufficient detail to permit evaluation. The proposal shall be detailed and complete so as to clearly demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough comprehension of all technical, management and other requirements. If an Offeror fails to comply with content requirements, its proposal may be downgraded for failure to follow instructions.

Offerors hand carrying proposals shall call Gina Meloy at (360) 315-0433 at least 48 hours prior to arriving at the Naval Undersea Warfare Center in Keyport, Washington to make arrangements. Offerors should wait at the Keyport Pass and ID building (610 Dowell Street, Keyport WA 98345, Monday through Friday 0600 – 1600 PST) to meet the escort. Packages should not be sealed, as they are subject to inspection.

Additional electronic copies of Volume IV – Cost Proposal of the Offeror’s Proposal shall also be submitted in parallel to the Offeror’s cognizant DCAA office and Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). Subcontractor Cost information may be contained within Volume IV - Cost Proposal, OR, Subcontractor data may be submitted prior to the date and time set forth in Block 9 of the SF 33 directly to the Procurement Contracting Officer clearly marked with Prime Contractor’s name. In any event, an additional set of Subcontractor’s data shall be submitted directly to its respective cognizant DCAA office.

1.3. SOLICITATION PACKAGE PROPOSAL CONTENT

(a) The offer shall consist of and must include the following:

Standard Form 33, “Solicitation, Offer and Award,” with blocks 12 through 18 completed by the Offeror.

Block 12 shall be filled in with a minimum of 270 days to allow for sufficient time to evaluate proposals.

The Offeror must fill in all areas of the RFP listed as Offeror fill-ins and provide any other information or data required by the solicitation. In Section B, all data costs shall be included as specified in Section V of the Cost Proposal.

RFP Section K, “Representation, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors,” completed by the Offeror. Identify if the information is in System for Award Management (SAM) on line or provide if not already in SAM. Refer to Section K for the complete list of items to provide.

Volumes I through IV in accordance with the requirements identified herein. See Section 1.1 in Section L for the number of copies to submit.

(b) Proposals shall demonstrate an understanding of the requirements and the proposed method of completing the Statement of Work. Technical and management information shall be prepared in such a manner as to enable source selection personnel to make a thorough and complete evaluation and arrive at a sound determination as to whether or not the solutions proposed and described will satisfy the requirements of the Government. To facilitate the evaluation, the Proposal shall be sufficiently detailed and complete to clearly demonstrate that the prospective Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and the technical and management problems inherent therein, and has a valid, practical solution for each contemplated problem. It should also contain sufficient detail to indicate the proposed means for complying with all applicable specifications. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands and can or will comply with all specifications, statements paraphrasing the specifications or parts thereof, and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used,” etc., will be considered insufficient and potentially deficient.

(c) The Proposal shall outline the proposed requirements as interpreted by each Offeror, the technical and management approach to the requirement, any interpretations or deviations to the Statement of Work, and any other topics deemed pertinent. The Offeror shall comply with all solicitation requirements, terms, and conditions and shall provide a statement to that effect. Any exceptions shall be identified to the Government prior to receipt of the Offeror’s proposal. Failure to comply with all solicitation requirements may result in the Offeror being considered ineligible for award.

2. VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL / MANAGEMENT APPROACH

Volume I shall consist of the following:

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL

FACTOR 2: MANAGEMENT

No Cost or price information shall be included in any of the above sections.

2.1. FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL

The required content of this volume is identified below, to be organized in the same order as the appropriate subparagraphs discussed below, with information specific to SOW references clearly identified. The Offeror may, however, expand on or include text in addition to the required contents, provided it is relevant and demonstrates a capability that is beneficial for performance of the resultant contract and does not exceed the page number limitation set for the technical volume.

2.1.1. SUBFACTOR 1: PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION COMPLIANCE

This section shall be substantially specific, detailed, and complete to clearly demonstrate the Offeror's understanding of, and the ability to meet, the requirements of the solicitation, SOW, PIPS, and various exhibits. Use of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) hardware is encouraged.

The Offeror shall demonstrate how the proposed device satisfies the Performance Requirements and complies with the requirements of the PIPS. Include a compliance matrix to demonstrate understanding of every requirement in the PIPS. Provide functional descriptions, diagrams, drawings, flow charts, acoustical performance data, computer predictions, and any other data required to clearly define product compliance, to address the following:

2.1.1.1. Acoustic Requirements

Describe how the device will comply with the Acoustic Requirements of the PIPS. Describe the methodology to ensure the following requirements are met: Frequency, Acoustic Directivity Pattern, Acoustic Endurance, Discrete Acoustic Source Level and Acoustic Band Level for the Signal Modes.

2.1.1.2. Operational Requirements

Describe how the device will comply with the Operational Requirements of the PIPS. Describe the methodology to ensure the following requirements are met: Hover System, Acoustic Operating Depth, Operational Attitude, and Ascent & Descent Rate.

Describe how the ADC will interface with the CSA system, launch tube, and gas generator, including both physical and electrical interfaces.

2.1.1.3. Launch Requirements

Describe how the device will comply with the Launch Requirements of the PIPS. Describe the methodology to ensure the following requirements are met: Depth, Speed, Stresses, Acceleration, Compressive Impact, Bending Moments and Shear Standby Condition and Activation.

2.1.1.4. Launch Trajectory Requirements

Describe the Launch Trajectory analysis used to ensure the device complies with the Launch Trajectory requirements and the Trajectory Test Methods of the PIPS.

2.1.1.5. Scuttle Requirements

Describe how the device will comply with the Scuttle Requirements of the PIPS. Describe the methodology to ensure the Hardware and Software Scuttle requirements are met with analytical results and/or measured data to support the claims of predicted performance. Include a narrative on how the device will not be recoverable, or if recovered, will be useless for analysis after operation. Specifically include the methods used for sanitization of all Critical Program Information as defined by DoD Instruction 5200.39.

2.1.1.6. Energy Source Requirements

Describe how the device will comply with the Energy Source Requirements of the PIPS. Describe the anticipated Energy Source Requirements of the proposed devices with analytical results and/or measured data to support the claims of predicted performance.

2.1.1.7. Test Plan

Describe the Offeror’s planned test program, necessary to meet the requirements of the RFP, SOW, and PIPS, including all first article and factory acceptance tests.

(a) Provide a matrix of tests and procedures to be performed and their applicable requirement.

(b) Provide a time schedule showing the sequence of tests regardless if tests are performed serially or in parallel.

(c) Describe the methods for: recording/archiving/securing (if classified) test data, analyzing test data, resolving/correcting failures, re-testing, and contingency plans.

(d) Describe the methods of testing at each level (e.g. subassembly and assembly).

(e) Reliance on Quality Assurance statistical techniques in manufacturing to reduce the need for tests to be performed.

2.1.2. SUBFACTOR 2: COROLLARY PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE

Describe how the device will comply with the requirements of the SOW and the PIPS in the following areas:

2.1.2.1. Reliability

Describe how the dormant reliability meets the requirements of the SOW and the PIPS. Describe the reliability program to be implemented by the Offeror in order to maintain high system reliability throughout the manufacturing process. Clearly specify any enhancements or features of the proposed device which exceed the Dormant Reliability/Shelf Life requirement of the ADC MK 3 and ADC MK 4.

2.1.2.2. Integrated Logistics

Describe how the Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) program will be developed in accordance with the SOW for the products used in the ADC MK 3 and ADC MK 4. Describe how all hardware and software products, including all NDI/COTS, modified NDI/COTS, and newly developed items delivered under this contract will be fully supportable throughout their life cycle. The Offeror shall also provide a detailed explanation to their approach for obsolescence management.

2.1.2.3. Safety Requirements

Describe how the device will comply with the Safety Requirements of the SOW and the PIPS. Describe the methodology to ensure Personnel, Hardware, Software, and Explosive safety requirements are met.

2.1.2.4. Configuration Management

Describe how compliance with all of the Configuration Management requirements in the SOW will be met, to include, the Offeror’s published internal Configuration Management procedures, subcontractor Configuration Management control, schedule of Configuration Management audits and events, baseline management and control, and engineering documentation. In addition, discuss in detail the Configuration Management procedures by which control of all device interfaces will be managed.

2.1.2.5. Software Development Plan

If the Offeror’s design requires software development, include a Software Development Plan (SDP) that describes the Offeror’s software development practices and is in accordance with the content defined in the SOW. The SDP shall not be subject to the technical proposal page limitation of the solicitation.

Describe why the Offeror’s specific approach is appropriate for the device to be procured and how its proposed processes are equivalent to those articulated by Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) capability Level 2.

The SDP rationale is subject to the technical proposal page limitation of the solicitation and shall not exceed 3 pages.

2.1.2.6. Performance Enhancements

The Government will consider performance enhancements proposed by the Offeror in determining best value.

Offerors may submit a description of proposed enhancements to the device that increase reliability, capability or shelf life, while conforming to the requirements of the SOW and the PIPS.

2.2. FACTOR 2: MANAGEMENT

2.2.1. SUBFACTOR 1: MANUFACTURING

The Offeror shall present a clear and complete picture of precisely how the Offeror intends to manufacture the device for which it has submitted an offer. Total capability must be demonstrated, whether that capability resides with the prospective Offeror who would ultimately be the prime, a team member, or subcontractor. The Offeror shall identify which capabilities will be completed by the prime, a team member, or subcontractor. Additionally, the Offeror shall demonstrate compliance with the SOW and the PIPS.

2.2.1.1. Manufacturing Plan

The Offeror may present the Manufacturing Plan in its own format as long as it meets the requirements of this solicitation and addresses, at a minimum, the following elements:

(a) Control of classified information; including software, firmware and other classified data.

(b) Description of how technical information, including drawings will be converted into work instructions, how the accuracy of this information will be validated and maintained current, and the methods which will be used to incorporate feedback from the shop floor.

(c) Gantt chart showing internal milestones and events including preparation of procedures, procurement of long lead and subcontracted items, and fabrication/assembly required to meet the contract schedule. The chart must identify all tasks, each task’s duration, critical sub-paths, the most-critical path, and slack time included for mitigating schedule slippage.

(d) Describe the manufacturing, life cycle maintenance, packaging, handling, storage and transportation, or disposal processes in reference to pollution prevention and safety and health goals.

(e) Describe how environmental compliance will be maximized. Identify procedures and standards that have been, or will be, established to identify, evaluate, eliminate or control the use of hazardous waste or Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS). Identify any pollution prevention goals.

(f) Tabulation of the components or services that will be subcontracted which are considered to be the most critical to the proposed effort. Indicate which of these components or services, if any, are on or affect the most-critical path, and discuss what monitoring, controls or alternative efforts will be taken to ensure that on-time delivery to the Navy will be maintained. The table shall include, for each component or service, in calendar days after contract award the planned order date, vendor lead time, Offeror’s in-plant need date, and available slack time.

(g) Describe the planned allocation of resources in sufficient detail to demonstrate the capacity of the Offeror and their subcontractors to perform the work proposed under this requirement. Identify other programs that may compete for the Offeror's equipment and facility resources.

(h) Provide a Make-or-Buy Program in accordance with NAVSEA clause HQ L-2-0004. The Make-or-Buy

Program is not subject to the page limitation.

2.2.1.2. Quality Assurance Plan

Include a summary of the Offeror’s Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program Plan considered necessary for the performance of the planned contract. Quality Assurance may be integrated into the Manufacturing Plan but the relevant sections must be clearly referenced here (i.e. page number(s), section number(s), paragraph(s), etc.).

Discuss, at a minimum, the following Quality Assurance issues:

(a) Product Assurance Provisions: Provide a full description of the Offeror’s existing Quality Assurance Program, and how it complies with the requirements of the SOW in demonstrating system quality and conformance with the PIPS. Cite evidence of recent audits/surveys that were conducted and certified by Defense Contract Administrative Service (DCAS) to verify the Offeror's device meets these requirements and that processes and procedures are in place to fulfill the requirements specified in the SOW. Include plans for implementation of a defect reduction program (in-house and at major subcontractors (subcontractors proposed to perform at least $2,000,000 or more per year for this requirement (hereinafter all such firms are referred to as “major subcontractors”)) with specific details on failure analysis and corrective actions. In addition, discuss how this program will focus on prevention rather than downstream detection.

(b) Plans and methodology to meet Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) requirements including parts upgrade screening of selected non-standard electronic parts and re-screening of MIL-STD parts.

(c) Plans to test for and control the presence of Electrostatic Discharge (ESD), as well as employee ESD knowledge and experience, which might or might not include a training program.

(d) Ability to maintain parts tolerances within specified limits. Receiving inspection requirements for outsourced parts.

(e) Application of statistical techniques in manufacturing to reduce the need for redundant testing and rework to be performed.

(f) A description of the approach that will be used to inspect and track all manufactured and outsourced parts.

(g) A description of the Offeror’s Quality Assurance (QA) system's critical control points, and its means for determining minimum yield values for each critical point as required by the SOW. Critical quality control points may include multi-layer boards, hybrids, modules, trays, system burn-in, and/or end items (final inspection and test). The critical quality control points must be applicable to the manufacture of the device, based on the design.

(h) Describe the Offeror’s incoming inspection procedures to detect counterfeit electronic components.

(i) Statistical Quality Control Techniques. Describe how the Offeror’s use of statistical techniques complies with the SOW. Describe the Offeror’s internal organization and provide details of this technical approach/man-loading/risk assessment and predictions for assuring a controlled manufacturing process. Describe each manufacturing process element, in terms of the measurement and acceptable variance, and address the rationale for selecting the stated parameters.

Technical/Schedule/Cost Risks should also be noted. Reference other portions of the proposal that strengthen or validate the Offeror’s statistical technique approach.

2.2.1.3. Facilities

The Offeror shall describe the facilities (both hardware and software) and special equipment required to fabricate and deliver the proposed device. The facilities description shall be in sufficient detail to allow evaluation of the Offeror's ability to meet performance, fabrication, and test requirements based upon the proposed program schedule.

Identify any acoustic and hydrodynamic facilities, both external and internal, including test sites and platforms, and model shop and prototype fabrication facilities including transducer fabrication. Include a description of special test instrumentation with a statement concerning the in-house calibration program applicable to the standard laboratory measurement instruments to be used.

The Offeror shall identify any arrangements to use facilities from other sources to include vendors, subcontractors, or Government activities with unique test facilities. Identify any equipment and/or facilities, which must be procured for performance of this contract. The Offeror must indicate which facilities are company owned/leased and which are subcontractor owned/leased. Identify the square footage and location of proposed facilities shown on layout diagram(s). In addition, provide the status of safety, explosive, and environmental certifications for these facilities necessary to manufacture the proposed device.

The Government reserves the right for Government technical evaluation personnel to visit manufacturing facilities.

Accordingly, a point of contact should be provided to facilitate visits. This shall include the address to forward security clearance information.

2.2.2. SUBFACTOR 2: MANAGEMENT APPROACH

The narrative associated with the below sections must be sufficiently complete as to clearly demonstrate that the Offeror understands the overall management approach and resource aspects of the ADC MK 3 and ADC MK 4 equipment and how the Offeror proposes to comply with the requirements of the RFP. If teaming or joint venture is applicable, the Offeror shall expand the organizational description requested to illustrate the working levels of internal and external interfaces among subcontractors and team members.

The Offeror shall discuss the technical, cost and schedule risks associated with the program. This discussion shall include the relative degree of risk, proposed approach to mitigate or eliminate each risk area and the effects of such approaches to the program outcome in terms of performance, reliability, cost and schedule. This discussion shall describe how this risk assessment will be documented and updated to keep the risk assessment current through all major stages of the program. The Offeror shall describe their approach to tracking progress against milestones and cost performance in this section.

The Offeror shall describe their devices and procedures that will ensure management of and accountability for Government-Furnished Property (GFP) and Government-Furnished Information (GFI).

The Offeror shall describe their use of production data to successfully manage the program. At a minimum the Offeror shall describe:

(a) Types of data collected

(b) Length of time that data has been collected

(c) Examples of actions taken as a result of data results or trends

(d) Organizations/personnel with responsibility to review production data

(e) Any changes in data type collected during the execution of the program and reason for change

The Offeror shall provide an organizational chart with a list of the contacts for the management and engineering team.

The Government has identified the following “key” personnel: Program Manager, Chief Engineer, Lead Electrical Engineer, Lead Mechanical Engineer, Lead Logistician, Senior Countermeasure Technician, Quality Assurance Manager, and Production Manager. The Offeror shall identify any additional “key” personnel necessary for execution of its performance approach and the unique knowledge of requirements or skills that factored into the assignment of those personnel. The Offeror shall provide resumes for all "key" personnel. The resumes will not count against the maximum page limitation for this factor. For personnel not under the Offeror’s employ, the resume should indicate “pending” and shall be signed by the individual represented by the resume.

Resumes for these key personnel shall be in Offeror’s format, not to exceed two pages in length, and, at a minimum, include the following information:

i. Name

ii. Job Title & Labor Category

iii. Present Position & Company

iv. Time in Present Position

v. Total Years of Experience

vi. Security Clearance

vii. Percent of Time Assigned to applicable RFP CLINs for this effort

viii. Experience/Work History (include prior assignments)

ix. Professional Memberships and Affiliations

x. Patents and Publications

xi. Awards Received

Include an attestation that states, “We attest to the accuracy of the information contained herein, and that an agreement has been reached regarding salary, position and work commitment to this project:” The attestation must be signed and dated by both the employee and a company official.

The Offeror shall identify all assumptions related to the allocation of labor mixes associated with the SOW and the overall labor mixes proposed for the Engineering Services CLINs.