Attach_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 43 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Builder Instructor, Administrative and Financial Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0024418R0036
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N0024418R0036_Amendment_0001.doc | DOC document | |
| N0024418R0036_RFP.doc | DOC document | |
| Attach_4_past_performance_data_sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| Attach_6_Sample_Cost_Proposal.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Company Name:
1. Reference Point of Contact Information:
Name:
City/State:
Telephone #:
Email:
2. Contract/Project Information:
Contract/Project Name:
Date of Contract:
Approx. Value of Services:
3. Services Received:
Briefly Describe Services Received:
4. Rate Services Received Please rate services received by entering and “X” in the applicable rating block below. Definitions for ratings are listed at the bottom of this form:
| Substantial Confidence |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Limited Confidence |
| Neutral Confidence |
| No Confidence |
Quality of product or service—compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical expertise.
Timeliness-compliance with contract timeliness requirements for providing the services.
Customer Service—courteous interactions, satisfaction of end users with contractor’s service, initiative and proactive suggestions, approaches and improvements
Overall satisfaction of performance/service, if applicable
5. Please Provide Written Comments To Explain Your Ratings (Use Additional Sheets If Necessary):
6. Rater:
Signature Printed Name & Title Date
Return completed form to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Contracts Code 250
Nancy Landeros 805-982-2189 nancy.landero@navy.mil
DEFINITIONS
| Rating |
| Description |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral Confidence |
| No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. |
| Limited Confidence |
| Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
File details come from the government source that posted it.