Design Build QA.pdf
PDF 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Design and Build Construction Contract
- Solicitation number
- N00178-25-Q-4227
About this file
This document is a Sources Sought Questions and Answers document for a Navy contract (NSWCDD Design Build, solicitation N00178-25-Q-4227) with several key details. The contract is intended for an 8(a) entity, with an estimated total value between $80-90 million. The requirement involves a design-build Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, likely for the Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD). Regarding personnel requirements, a Secret security clearance is mandatory. Bonding requirements will be determined per task order, though a bonding letter is acceptable with capability statements. The government noted that the "Element E – Bidding CDRLs – Design to Build IDIQ" attachment was initially difficult to access in SAM but can be viewed by saving and reopening the file.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Will proposed personnel be required to hold an existing Secret or Top- Secret security clearance, or is base access clearance sufficient to meet the mandatory requirements? Secret
Sources Sought- NSWCDD Design Build (N00178-25-Q-4227) Question and Answers Questions Answers
What is the anticipated dollar value of the overall capacity of the contract for the base and option years?
Is this requirement intended for an entity-owned 8(a) firm, such as firms owned by Indian tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, Native Hawaiian Organizations, or Community Development Corporations?
“Element E – Bidding CDRLs – Design to Build IDIQ” attachment is corrupt in SAM and will not open, please provide.
At this time, we do not have a set project schedule, however the Government is estimating the value of this requirement to be between $80 and $90M.
In accordance with the posting, yes the intention is to award to an 8(a) entity.
Overall bonding requirements will be per task order (IAW the PWS), however a bonding letter would be acceptable with the capbability statements.
After testing the link, it was determined that if you view from SAM page it will not open properly, however if you save it and then open it, it can be viewed.
What are the bonding requirements, and shall the contractor submit a bonding letter for proof of capability with the sources sought response?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .