18RJQ26_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of the amendment is to extend the closing date, correct formatting and errors in 52.212-1 and 52.212-2 Addendums, answ er vendor questions and revise PS . The title of the Statement of Work has been updated as w ell as paragraph 3.1. Attachment 1, Performance Specification PS17JXQR152_DOS-CQS and Attachment 2, Performance Specification PS17JXQR152_DOS-CM have been updated to remove reference to SOP/16/JXQ/460.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 34

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Feb-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0016418RJQ26

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-Feb-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Feb-2018

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

K. ALCORN (812-854-6019)

BLDG 3373

300 HWY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0016418RJQ26

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION 4.0 - CLAUSES & OTHER FULL TEXT INFORMATION

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 1.0 - SCHEDULE/INSPECTION & ACCEPTANCE/DELIVERY

The required response date/time has changed from 06-Mar-2018 12:00 PM to 20-Mar-2018 02:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

RESPONSE TO VENDOR QUESTIONS

CQS response questions

52.212-1, Addendum 2 and 52.212-2, Addendum 3 have been updated to resolve all questions regarding the instructions to offerors and evaluation of proposals.

All attachments were posted on February 2, 2018 to fbo.gov under file 18RJQ26_sol_att.zip

Where should the delivery data referenced in Addendum 2.0, be cross referenced on the matrix.

The offeror shall address the capability to meet delivery schedule in the response to paragraph

3.1 of the statement of work.

Regarding the 60 day extension for color change:

The offerors were notified a minimum of four times about the requirement of the CQS being non-black well in advance of the request for proposals. A draft copy of the specification was released with two RFIs; one on Oct 13, 2016, and another on Dec 07, 2016. Additionally, in-depth discussions were held with the potential offerors during SHOT Show in January of 2017 and again during the SHOT Show in January of 2018, where the requirement for non-black color was a topic of discussion.

Please define the Essential Functions and Failure Definitions for the CQS.

Please provide specific section or area of the RFP that is in question, so the Government can provide the best response.

Will the Govt be using the Class I, II, and III failure definitions or will they score them as Non- Essential Function Failures (NEFF), Essential Function Failure – Operator Correctible (EFFOC), and Essential Function Failure – Non-Operator Correctible (EFFNOC)?

Please provide specific section or area of the RFP that is in question, so the Government can provide the best response.

Does the Govt provide Scoring Criteria for Test Peculiar failures (Test Equipment induced Failures) or Training failures (not following operating procedures).

Please provide specific section or area of the RFP that is in question, so the Government can provide the best response.

Will the Govt provide a copy of the Failure Definition Scoring Criteria (FDSC)?

Please provide specific section or area of the RFP that is in question, so the Government can provide the best response.

Para 3.5 – Is this optical centerline of the viewing window or when the reticle is centered in its horizontal and vertical travel?

--Paragraph 3.5 Optical Centerline. Regarding this specification only, the optical centerline refers to the optical centerline of the viewing window.

Para 3.21 – The optical centerline of the optic may not be parallel to the bore.

--Paragraph 3.21 Zero Adjustment Range. Regarding this specification only, the reticle will be centered in the window of the sight before measuring the zero adjustment range.

Para 3.22 - Adjuster Tracking We question if this is specification is written correctly for a red dot sight, not a rifle scope. We utilize a aspherical (curved) lens which may cause the adjustments to appear to move in a parabolic fashion. The aspherical lens is the key component that provides the superior optical performance. We could modify our product to meet this requirement, but it would reduce optical performance.

--The specification is written as intended.

Para 3.50 – Two thresholds are listed. One states no malfunction or degradation of performance up to 35,000 ft. and the other states up to 25,000 ft. Both are listed as (T) while 50,000 ft. is listed as the objective.

--Correct. One threshold is following exposure and one threshold is during exposure.

Para 3.50 – Please define what constitutes a failure under the definitions of “malfunction, damage, or degradation.” These terms appear vague and open to interpretation.

--Anything that results in the sight failing to meet a threshold in the performance specification.

Para 3.51 - The MIL-STDs listed state what the CQS will be exposed to, but again the terms “malfunction, damage, or degradation” are unclear. Please define.

--Anything that results in the sight failing to meet a threshold in the performance specification.

Para 3.59 – MIL-STD 810G (Change 1) States “ Tailoring is essential. Select methods, procedures and parameter levels based on the tailoring process described in Part One, paragraph 4.2.2, and Annex C.” How are the test methods tailored to a Close Quarter Sight? What are the durations for the test methods described in 514.7? Will the optic be attached to the weapon during vibration testing? Will the optic be packaged when carried as cargo in Categories 7, 8, 9 and 10?

The government will tailor test procedures to best accomplish the test purpose (see MIL-STD- 810G Ch1, Annex A, paragraph 2.1), and to be as realistic as possible (see Annexes B-E).

Refer to METHOD 514.7, ANNEX C, for possible configurations, variation, orientations, and durations of the vibration testing.

Please review the conflict between 3.7.1.1 and 3.7.1.2. Our question is how can you issue a FRACUS when you have not repaired the unit? Both 3.7.1.1 and 3.7.1.2 should have the same time frame of 30 days?

--No conflict;

3.7.1.1 addresses the contractor has 14 calendar days to evaluate and report to the Government in accordance with CDRL A007.

3.7.1.2 addresses the if the analysis (from 3.7.1.1) shows that a failed unit cannot be repaired and returned in 30 calendar days then it will be replaced.

Cut away products and models will contain contractor proprietary intellectual property. Please define the Intellectual Property Protections that the Government will provide to the contractor for the following CDRL’s:

3.10.3 Non-Functional Units, Cutaways, and Subassemblies:

3.10.3.1 Non-Functional Units:

3.10.3.2 Transparent Housing Units:

3.10.3.3 Cutaway Models: T

3.10.3. 4. Subassemblies:

--Refer to CDRL A018, bullet on Data Rights.

ATT_1_PS17JXWR152_DOS-CQS_Performance Specification, Section 3.9 Clarity and Resolution.

Could the Government please identify whether the following requirement is Threshold (T) or Objective (O):

“A person with 20/20 (corrected if necessary) unaided vision using the CQS shall be able to resolve a USAF 1951 bar target (100% contrast) or four bar equivalent of 1.72 cycles/milliradian (mrad).”

--This is a Threshold.

The solicitation does not specifically state whether the offeror is REQUIRED to submit bid samples and proposal data for BOTH the MAS-D CQS & the MAS-D CM. Can the supplier submit its bid only for the MAS-D CQS?

--The solicitation states “and/or”. Yes the supplier can submit a bid for only the CQS.

If the offeror chooses to submit a proposal and bid samples only for the PS17JXQR152 MAS-D CQS with an offer & pricing to procure an existing COTS Magnifier if awarded the contract, would that supplier receive an unfavorable evaluation?

-- Failure to submit product samples will be considered an incomplete proposal.

Per CQS compliance 3.14, suggests a requirement for a wireless capability. Can the Government confirm that the offeror will still be compliant and meet threshold if the product does not contain wireless device?

--Correct. Wireless is only an objective, non-wireless is considered compliant.

Does the Government require a spiral path to incorporate a wireless capability?

--Not at this time.

The thermal drift spec SOP/16/JXQR/460 doesn’t seem to be included, nor can be found on the provided website for gov’t docs. Can the Government provide a thermal drift/thermal analysis specification (O) or (T).

--Refer to ATT_1_PS17JXQR152_DOS-CQS_Performance_Specification, paragraph 3.16 Thermal Stability for Thresholds and Objectives.

ATT_1_PS17JXQR152_DOS-CQS is being revised to remove reference to this Government Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). This is a Government interal SOP and will not be provided.

The following have been modified:

STATEMENT OF WORK

NSWC CRANE

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR

MINIATURE AIMING SYSTEMS – DAY OPTIC (MAS-D)

CLOSE QUARTERS SIGHT (CQS) AND

CLIP-ON MAGNIFIER (CM)

N00164-18-R-JQ26

5 February 2018

CRANE DIVISION

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.

1.0 Scope: The Statement of Work (SOW) sets forth the requirements for the procurement, manufacturing, program management support, Configuration Management (CM), warranty repair, technical documentation, and training for the Miniature Aiming Systems – Day Optics (MAS-D) Squad – Close Quarters Sight (CQS) and Clip-On Magnifier (CM) for the Close Quarter Sight (CQS), hereafter referred to as CQS.

1.1 Background

The mission of United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) MAS-D is to provide Special Operations Forces (SOF) with weapon sights and optics optimized in their configuration for individual, squad and precision small arms that will improve situational awareness, decrease engagement times, and increase Probability of Hit P(h) commensurate to the effective range of the weapon and its munitions. Intended for use with Compact Rifles and Assault Rifles in 0-

300m rapid engagements, the CQS incorporates an illuminated shape and/or dot imposed on a WFOV lens to increase the speed of target acquisition. The CQS will include or merge a magnified ancillary optic to enhance target acquisition while maneuvering in open terrain before or after close quarter engagements.

2.0 Applicable Documents:

2.1 Department of Defense Specifications, Standards, and Handbooks

PS/17/JXQR/151 Performance Specification for Miniature Aiming Systems – Day Optic Sight (MAS-D) Clip-On Magnifier (CM) for the Close Quarter Sight (CQS)

PS/17/JXQR/152 Performance Specification for Miniature Aiming Systems –

Day Optic Sight (MAS-D) Close Quarter Sight (CQS)

MIL-PRF-63033C Performance Specification Manuals, Technical:

Demilitarization of Surplus Military Items, Preparation of, 18 May 2009

MIL-STD-130N(1) Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, 16 Nov

2.2 Availability of DOD Documents

Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents may be viewed or downloaded from the ASSIST database at http://quicksearch.dla.mil/.

2.3 Non-Government Standards and Other Publications

ASQ/ANSI/ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems– Requirements, 21 Oct 2015

ANSI/EIA-649-B Configuration Management Standard, Apr 2011

2.4 Availability of Non-Government Standards and Other Publications

Non-Government Publications are available from the American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, 4th floor, New York, NY 10036, or at http://webstore.ansi.org/default.aspx

2.5 Order of Precedence

In the event of a conflict between the text of this document and the references cited herein, the text of this document shall take precedence. Nothing in this document shall supersede applicable Federal, State, or Local Laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

3.0 Requirements:

3.1 General

The Contractor shall provide CQS Systems in accordance with (IAW) this SOW and the performance requirements contained in the Performance Specification reference identified in paragraph 2.1 referred herein as Performance Specification. The Contractor shall be responsible for all requirements set forth in this Statement of Work.

Split awards for line itesm 0001 and 0002, and their corresponding options may be made.

3.2 Quality

3.2.1 Quality Program: The Contractor shall have a quality system that ensures conformance to contractual requirements and meets the requirements of ASQ/ANSI/ISO 9001:2015, or an equivalent quality system model. (Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A001, Quality Assurance Program Plan)

3.2.2 Quality Conformance Inspections and Tests: The Contractor shall ensure each CQS undergoes Contractor acceptance testing conducted in accordance with the Government approved Acceptance Test Plan (ATP). The Contractor shall inspect and verify all equipment at source. The Contractor shall only deliver items to the Government that have successfully passed the Contractor’s Acceptance Testing Plan (ATP). (CDRL A002, Acceptance Test Plan)

In addition to the Acceptance Test Plan, the Contractor shall submit all Test Procedures for Government review and approval. (CDRL A003, Test Procedure)

3.2.3 Quality Conformance Inspection and Test Results: The Contractor shall provide inspection and test results for CQS systems produced for this contract. (CDRL A004, Acceptance Test Report (ATR))

3.3 Program Support

3.3.1 Program Management: The Contractor shall develop and execute a plan to manage the CQS Program. The Contractor shall be responsible for overall CQS performance and shall define and maintain appropriate subcontract and associated contract relationships to support all contract requirements. The Contractor shall designate a Point of Contact responsible for substantive communication with the Government.

3.3.2 Post Award Conference: A Post Award Conference shall be held within 30 calendar days after contract award. An exact date and location for the post-award conference shall be mutually agreed upon after contract signing. The conference will specifically discuss all sections of the contract in detail with emphasis on programmatic points of interest. The conference may include contracting officers, program managers, and essential personnel from both parties. The Contractor shall take the meeting minutes and provide a copy to the Government within 7 calendar days after the conclusion of the conference. (CDRL A005, Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes)

3.3.3 Program Review: The Contractor shall be responsible for attending program reviews on dates and locations mutually agreed upon with the Government. Program reviews shall convene as mutually agreed between the Contractor and the Government, but not more frequently than quarterly. A maximum of four program reviews will be held per year, with three at the Contractor’s facility and one at NSWC Crane. These reviews shall serve as a forum to resolve issues and exchange information in support of testing, production, repair, logistics support, and delivery of the CQS. Contractor performance discussions shall include but not be limited to:

schedule, technical performance, risk elements and assumptions, work around plans, anticipated problems, and program status. The Contractor shall ensure that appropriate personnel are available for conferences and reviews to address and resolve agenda items. The Contractor shall take the meeting minutes and provide a copy to the Government within 7 calendar days after the conclusion of each review. (CDRL A005, Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes)

3.3.4 Monthly Status and Progress Reports: The Contractor shall provide monthly progress reports identifying the status of delivery orders, warranty repairs, data deliverables, failure analysis and corrective actions, engineering change proposals, requests for variance, programmatic issues, technical issues, significant meetings, upcoming events, and milestones.

The Contractor shall participate in monthly telephone conferences to review the monthly status and progress reports, with exact dates and times mutually agreed upon with the Government.

(CDRL A006, Contractor's Progress, Status and Management Report)

3.3.5 Production Readiness Review: A Production Readiness Review (PRR) shall be held within 30 calendar days after contract award. An exact date and location for the PRR shall be mutually agreed upon after contract signing. The PRR shall evaluate manufacturing readiness, quality management, and requirements compliance. The PRR may be combined with the Post Award Conference. The Contractor shall take the meeting minutes and provide a copy to the Government within 7 calendar days after the conclusion of the conference. (CDRL A005, Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes)

3.3.6 Full Rate Production Decision Review: A Full Rate Production Decision Review (FRPDR) shall be held upon the completion of Developmental Testing and Operational Testing, and prior to the release for full rate production. An exact date and location for the FRPDR shall be mutually agreed upon. The FRPDR shall evaluate manufacturing readiness, quality management, Performance Specification requirements compliance, and product support activities. The Contractor shall take the meeting minutes and provide a copy to the Government within 7 calendar days after the conclusion of the conference. (CDRL A005, Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes)

3.4 Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability

3.4.1 Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS): The Contractor shall establish a failure analysis and corrective action system for equipment and process reliability that includes requirements for reporting, analyzing, and correcting system failures. The Contractor shall analyze the cause of each failure that occurs during Government acceptance testing of new production systems and systems returned to the Contractor for repair. The

Contractor shall identify pattern failures. The Contractor shall analyze these failures and implement corrective action to prevent or reduce the probability of failure recurrence. The Contractor shall submit a report detailing the investigation and analysis of the failure, as well as the corrective actions to be implemented. (CDRL A007, Failure Summary and Analysis Report)

3.4.2 Performance: The Contractor shall notify the Government immediately after identification of any and all performance related data that would both positively and negatively impact the performance, schedule, reliability, maintainability, availability, supportability, cost, or safety of the CQS. The Government reserves the right to test, validate, verify, or certify any and all of the CQS performance parameters to verify compliance with the Performance Specification and this

SOW.

3.5 Safety

The system safety requirements are to be performed throughout the life cycle of the system, along with new development, upgrades, modifications, resolution of deficiencies, or technology development. When properly applied, these requirements shall ensure the identification and understanding of all known hazards and their associated risks; and mishap risk eliminated or reduced to acceptable levels. The objective of system safety is to achieve acceptable mishap risk through a systematic approach of hazard analysis, risk assessment, and risk management.

3.5.1 System Hazards: The Contractor shall provide a system hazard analysis in a System Safety Hazard Analysis Report (SSHAR). The SSHAR shall identify hazards present during system use, maintenance, storage, transportation, and disposal. The SSHAR shall include a risk assessment and risk management recommendations for each identified hazard. The Contractor shall provide all necessary information and support to assist the Government in obtaining Naval Ordnance Safety and Security Activity (NOSSA) approval if required. (CDRL A008, System Safety Hazard Analysis Report (SSHAR))

3.5.2 Environmental and Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT): The Contractor shall have an established Environmental and HAZMAT program to ensure the system design, development, manufacturing, testing, evaluation, operations, and maintenance comply with federal, state, and local environmental laws, regulations, shipping regulations, policies, treaties, and agreements.

The Contractor shall identify the type, quantity, and potential hazards for all HAZMAT contained in the CQS system in the SSHAR. The Contractor shall provide Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for all HAZMAT identified. (CDRL A008, System Safety Hazard Analysis Report

(SSHAR))

3.5.3 HAZMAT Removal: If the CQS contains HAZMAT, the Contractor shall provide a manual IAW MIL-PRF-63033C detailing the processes and hazards associated with removing the HAZMAT from the CQS prior to demilitarization and disposal. (CDRL A009, Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Manuals and Associated Supplemental Data)

3.6 Configuration Management

The Contractor shall implement a Configuration Management (CM) Control system using ANSI/EIA-649-B as a guideline. The CM Program shall be in place for the life of the contract.

The Contractor’s CM Program shall provide configuration identification, configuration control, and configuration status accounting of all new and/or modified hardware, firmware, software, and documentation IAW ANSI/EIA-649-B. The Program shall address the Contractor’s procedures for CM, configuration review, and preparation, review, and processing of configuration changes.

The CQS initial product baseline shall be established at the time of contract award, with any follow on modifications to be completed through the Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) process. The Contractor shall support interchangeability and interoperability to the replaceable part level. All baselines shall be documented in the Contractor’s Configuration Management database. (CDRL A010, Product Base Line Index (PBLI))

3.6.1 Configuration Management Plan: The Contractor shall provide the Government with a CM Plan that describes the Contractor’s Configuration Management program. (CDRL A011, Supplier's Configuration Management Plan)

3.6.2 Configuration Status Accounting: The Contractor shall maintain Configuration Status Accounting (CSA) information in a Configuration Management database. The CM database shall include the as-built configuration, part number, serial number, revision levels, Acceptance Test Date, Software Revision, and all Class I ECPs incorporated for each system as delivered. The Government reserves the right to review the Contractors CM database upon request and the Contractor shall provide delivery of the electronic CM database at the conclusion of this contract. The Government will utilize the Contractor’s CM database as the single tracking system for configured hardware and software items for the CQS. (CDRL A012, Configuration Status Accounting (CSA) Information)

3.6.3 Engineering Change Proposal: The Contractor shall implement and control changes to the Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Process for Contractor and Government recommended and Government approved changes per ANSI/EIA-649-B. The Contractor should notify the Government if the ECP is of a nature that, without implementation, will adversely affect systems performance, personnel safety, or impact delivery schedules as part of the submission.

3.6.3.1 Class I Engineering Change Proposal: The Contractor shall submit changes that may affect the form, fit, function, cost or safety of a configuration item as a Class I ECP. The Contractor shall submit Class I ECPs for Government review and approval. The Contractor shall obtain Government written concurrence prior to the release of the Class I change.

Implementation prior to Government approval is at the risk of the Contractor. (CDRL A013, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP))

3.6.3.2 Class II Engineering Change Proposal: For an ECP that does not fall under the Class I ECP criteria, the Contractor shall submit a Class II ECP for review. The Government review of Class II changes will consist of a concurrence or non-concurrence with the classification category and content. The Government reserves the right to require a proposed Class II ECP to be resubmitted as a Class I ECP if it is determined to affect form, fit, function, cost or safety. The

Contractor shall obtain Government written concurrence prior to the release of the Class II change. Implementation prior to Government concurrence is at the risk of the Contractor. (CDRL A013, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP))

3.6.4 Request for Variance: The Contractor shall submit any temporary departure from the product baseline or performance specification for a specified serial number, range of serial numbers, or period of time as a Request for Variance (RFV). RFVs shall be submitted for Government review and acceptance. Implementation prior to Government approval is at the risk of the Contractor. (CDRL A014, Request for Variance (RFV))

3.7 Repair

3.7.1 Warranty Repair: All CQS systems returned for repair under the warranty provisions of this contract shall be subject to failure analysis by the Contractor at the Contractor’s expense.

The Contractor shall be responsible for having sufficient quantity of spares and replacement parts on hand to perform warranty repair. The Contractor shall be required to replace all damaged markings, identifications, and labels when the markings, identifications, or labels become unreadable IAW MIL-STD-130N(1) and the performance specification. All failures returned to the OEM for repair will have a Return Material Authorization (RMA) number assigned by the Contractor.

3.7.1.1 Warranty Failure Analysis: The Contractor shall perform failure analysis and submit a Failure Summary and Analysis Report within 14 calendar days after receipt of failed CQS.

(CDRL A007, Failure Summary and Analysis Report)

3.7.1.2 Warranty Repair Turn-Around Time: The Contractor shall provide a new CQS system if the failed system cannot be repaired and returned to the Government within 30 calendar days after receipt of item.

3.7.1.3 Warranty Repair to Specification Standards: CQS systems repaired or replaced under warranty shall meet the contractual product baseline. All repaired or replaced systems shall be tested IAW the same tests used for initial acceptance. New replacement assets shall have the same warranty as all other new assets. Repaired systems shall have a warranty of one (1) year from Government receipt of the repaired system, or the balance of the original warranty period, whichever is longer.

3.7.3 Repair Verification Testing: All repaired CQS systems shall be tested IAW the same tests used for initial acceptance with the same acceptance period.

3.8 Technical Data

3.8.1 Operators/Maintenance Technical Manual and Quick Reference Guide: The Contractor shall provide an Operator’s and Maintenance Manual for the CQS systems procured under this contract. The Operator’s and Maintenance Manual at a minimum shall include Introduction, Preparation for Use and Installation, Principles of Operation, Maintenance and Servicing Instructions (preventive and corrective), Preparation for Shipment, Parts List, Operational and

Maintenance Illustrations, Safety Precautions (Warnings, Cautions, and Notes), and information on the functionality of the CQS, its components and accessories, system operation from turn-on to system shut down including adjustments, and operator checks, and services. The Operator’s and Maintenance Manual shall be no larger than 4 ½ inches width x 5 ½ inches height. In addition to the Operators and Maintenance Manual, the Contractor shall provide a Quick Reference Guide. The Quick Reference Guide shall contain basic adjustment and operating procedures required to use the CQS in the field. The Government will provide publication numbers within 30 calendar days after CDRL submission. The Contractor shall provide an Operator’s and Maintenance Manual and Quick Reference Guide with each delivered CQS.

(CDRL A009, Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Manuals and Associated Supplemental Data)

3.8.2 Drawings and Associated Lists: The Contractor shall provide a top-level system drawing for the CQS. The Contractor shall provide a drawing for each Lowest Replaceable Unit (LRU) that can be removed and replaced. The top-level drawings for the CQS system and LRUs will be used for the purpose of Nomenclature and National Stock Number (NSN) assignments to support the life cycle management of the system, including maintenance and repairs. The latest revision of drawings shall be submitted to the Government throughout the life of the contract. The CQS and its LRU’s will have a unique NSN, which will be provided to the Contractor, unless NSN’s have already been assigned. (CDRL A015, Technical Data Package)

3.8.3 Documentation Updates: The Contractor shall ensure the technical data and documentation reflects the approved product baseline for the life of the contract.

3.9 Supply Support

3.9.1 Proposed Spare Parts List (PSPL): The Contractor shall employ the concept of concurrent release of spare parts orders with identical parts as installments on the production unit. The Contractor shall provide a PSPL of all CQS parts that can be removed and replaced. The PSPL shall be delivered in a top-down breakdown format and shall include repairable, replacement parts, and long lead time items from the LRU to the piece part level. Each item on the PSPL that is repairable /replaceable shall be priced and available for ordering. Failure by the Contractor to specify spare part determinations on the PSPL for individual items does not preclude the Government from requiring the Contractor to furnish and deliver the item and quantity of each item of spare and repair parts selected and approved by the Government to make up the provisioning parts. The PSPL shall contain the part number, nomenclature, CAGE, ordering quantity, part specific technical information to be used for National Stock Number (NSN) cataloging, and unit price. (CDRL A016, Proposed Spare Parts List; A017, Engineering Data for Provisioning (EDFP))

3.9.2 Shipping Documentation: The Contractor shall furnish documentation for each shipment of new items that clearly identifies the contract number, delivery order number, WAWF shipment number, contract line item number, NSN, part number, and quantity shipped. Warranty return shipment documentation shall reference the RMA under which the item was returned, NSN, part number, and quantity shipped. The Contractor shall include a serial number listing in ascending numerical order with all shipments. For all new item shipments, a serial listing in Microsoft Excel format shall be attached to the Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) receiving report.

3.9.3 Shipment Tracking: The Contractor shall ship all CQS systems via traceable means, and shall provide tracking information to the Government upon request.

3.9.4 Signed Receipts: The Contractor shall provide a signed copy of the shipping document to the Government within 2 business days of receipt of returned CQS systems.

3.9.5 Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation: The Contractor shall establish/maintain procedures for packaging, handling, storage, preservation, and shipping to protect the quality of products and prevent damage, loss, deterioration, degradation, or substitution of products. The Contractor shall also ensure when the CQS is in its shipping container, it shall withstand, without physical damage or degradation of performance, commercial modes of transportation.

3.9.6 Labeling and Marking: Each delivered CQS system shall have individual markings for each non-GFE subsystem that contains both the 2D UID barcode and human readable text in accordance with MIL-STD-130N(1) and the Performance Specification.

3.10 Training

3.10.1 New Equipment Training (NET) Curriculum and Materials: The Contractor shall provide a NET package to support Operator and Maintainer training as described in paragraphs 3.10.1.1 and 3.10.1.2. The Contractor shall grant the Government the authority to reproduce, update, or change the data contained in the NET Curriculum and Materials. (CDRL A018, Training Materials)

3.10.1.1 Operator NET Course Curriculum: The Operator NET Course Curriculum shall be comprised of all actions that the equipment user is required to perform to mount, operate, and maintain the HRS in the field. Operating functions shall include actions required to power the sight on and off, change batteries, zero, and perform other adjustments. Specific Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP) shall not be included.

3.10.1.2 Operator NET Training Video: The Contractor shall provide a NET Video demonstrating all actions that the equipment user is required to perform to mount, operate, and maintain the HRS in the field. Operating functions shall include actions required to power the sight on and off, change batteries, zero, and perform other adjustments. Specific Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP) shall not be included. The video shall not exceed one hour in length.

3.10.1.3 Maintainer NET Course Curriculum: The Maintainer NET Course Curriculum shall be comprised of preventative maintenance, troubleshooting, LRU removal and replacement, adjustment, and performance verification procedures to be conducted at operator, intermediate, and depot level maintenance facilities.

3.10.2 Institutional Training: The Contractor shall provide Operator and Maintainer NET to Government technical representatives at a government facility within the continental United

States. Training shall be for a maximum of 12 personnel. It is anticipated that training is to be conducted up to 1 time for each contracted year.

3.10.3 Non-Functional Units, Cutaways, and Subassemblies: The Contractor shall offer non-functional units, cutaway models, and subassemblies as training aids.

3.10.3.1 Non-Functional Units: The Contractor shall provide non-functional units which are representative of a functional deliverable unit on the exterior, to include functional knobs/buttons, without internal electronic components.

3.10.3.2 Transparent Housing Units: The Contractor shall provide non-functional units which are representative of a functional deliverable unit for internal electronics and exterior functions, but have a see through housing.

3.10.3.3 Cutaway Models: The Contractor shall provide non-functional units which are representative of a functional deliverable unit for internal electronics and exterior functions. One unit shall be cut along the “x” axis of the unit. One unit shall be cut along the “y” axis of the unit. Units shall have a clear epoxy coating applied to the dissected area to allow the unit to remain intact.

3.10.3. 4. Subassemblies: The Contractor shall provide sub-assemblies of production representative units.

4.0 Contract Item Data Deliverables

Exhibit "A" - Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL):

CDRL # CDRL TITLE DID#

A001 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM PLAN DI-QCIC-81794 NOT 1

A002 ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN DI-QCIC-80553A

A003 TEST PROCEDURE DI-NDTI-80603A

A004 ACCEPTANCE TEST REPORT (ATR) DI-QCIC-81891 NOT 1

A005 REPORT, RECORD OF MEETING/MINUTES DI-ADMN-81505

A006 CONTRACTOR’S PROGRESS, STATUS AND MANAGEMENT REPORT DI-MGMT-80227

A007 FAILURE SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS REPORT DI-SESS-80255A

A008 SYSTEM SAFETY HAZARD ANALYSIS (SSHAR) DI-SAFT-80101C

A009 COMMERCIAL OFF-THE-SHELF (COTS) MANUALS AND ASSOCIATED

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

DI-TMSS-80527C NOT 1

A010 PRODUCT BASELINE INDEX (PBLI) DI-CMAN-81218

A011 SUPPLIER’S CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PLAN DI-SESS-80858C

A012 CONFIGURATION STATUS ACCOUNTING (CSA) INFORMATION DI-SESS-81253C

A013 ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSAL (ECP) DI-SESS-80639D

A014 REQUEST FOR VARIANCE (RFV) DI-SESS-80640D

A015 TECHNICAL DATA PACKAGE DI-SESS-80776A

A016 PROPOSED SPARE PARTS LIST DI-PSSS -80134B

A017 ENGINEERING DATA FOR PROVISIONING (EDFP) DI-SESS-81874

A018 TRAINING MATERIALS DI-ILSS-80872 NOT 1

5.0 Special Conditions

The Contractor shall comply with all International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) controls and procedures for the handling, transfer, and storage of ITAR technology and information.

SECTION 4.0 - CLAUSES & OTHER FULL TEXT INFORMATION

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A CDRLs A001-A018 18 16-OCT-2017 Attachment 1 Past Performance Matrix 3 02-JAN-2018 Attachment 2 Past Performance

Questionaire

2 02-JAN-2018

Attachment 3 MAS-D Specification 15 08-JAN-2018 Attachment 4 Clip-on Magnifier

Specification

12 08-JAN-2018

Attachment 5 CM Compliance Matrix 1 08-JAN-2018 Attachment 6 Compliance Matrix MAS-

D

1 08-JAN-2018

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A CDRLs A001-A018 18 16-OCT-2017 Attachment 1 PS17JXQR152_DOS-

CQS_Performance_Specif ication_Dec_201

16-FEB-2018

Attachment 2 PS17JXQR151_DOS- CM_Performance_Specifi cation_Dec_2017

16-FEB-2018

Attachment 3 Compliance Matrix MAS- D

1 08-JAN-2018

Attachment 4 CM Compliance Matrix 1 08-JAN-2018 Attachment 5 Past Performance Matrix 3 02-JAN-2018 Attachment 6 Past Performance

Questionaire

2 02-JAN-2018

SECTION 5.0 - INSTRUCTIONS & PROVISIONS

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS—ADDENDUM 52.212-1

1.0 General Information

This provision specifies the organization, format and content of an offeror's technical and price proposals to be submitted in response to this solicitation for evaluation by the Government. The purpose of the instructions contained in this provision is to provide for uniform submission of all offerors' proposals. Uniformity is expected to facilitate Government efficiency and accuracy in the technical and price evaluation and source selection process.

The contents of the offeror's proposal shall be organized to conform to the requirements specified herein.

Requirements for the contents of each of the submitted written technical proposals are identified below. The order of presentation in the offeror's submitted written proposal shall correspond to the order of the Factors and Subfactors discussed below. The content requirements described below address major topics of concern to the Government.

Failure to respond to any of these topics will be consider a "deficiency". Any additional text provided must be relevant and demonstrate capabilities beneficial to the overall requirements described in this solicitation. Each written proposal must be separate and contain sufficient information to permit a detailed evaluation. Previously submitted data, if any, will not be used in the evaluation of your response to this solicitation.

Offerors' technical and price proposal shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of this provision.

Clarity and conciseness of the material presented may have a bearing upon proposal evaluation. While only relevant material should be included, the material must be complete. Any offeror's experience, capability, knowledge and understanding not specifically described in the submitted proposal will not be assumed to exist by the Government during evaluation.

Full, accurate and complete information shall be set forth in the submissions to facilitate a thorough and timely evaluation by the Government. This will be an acquisition effort utilizing a best value approach. The Offeror(s) product samples and proposals will be evaluated to ensure that their system complies with the criteria listed in the solicitation.

Offerors are cautioned that the Government reserves the right to make award based on initial offers without discussions with offerors. Therefore, it is imperative that the information provided in the offeror's response to the solicitation be complete and accurate and that the prices proposed be the offeror’s best terms. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, if considered necessary by the contracting officer, discussions may be conducted with those offerors determined to be in the competitive range.

THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PROPOSAL THAT DOES NOT

COMPLY WITH THESE PROPOSAL PREPARATION/SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS.

PROPOSALS SHALL NOT CONTAIN CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.

1.1 Restriction of Disclosure/Proprietary Information

If the offeror wishes to restrict the disclosure or use of its proposal, a proper legend must be included on materials provider. Individual subcontractor/vendor proprietary information may be submitted via separate binders/CDs. The information contained in these binders/CDs must be referenced (by binder title, page and section number as appropriate) within the main proposal where the information would have been included if it were not subcontractor/vendor proprietary. The information in these separate binders/CDs is subject to all other requirements of the RFP and must be well-marked to clearly indicate any special handling instructions.

1.2 Questions

It is the offeror's responsibility to bring to the attention of the Contracting Officer at the earliest possible time, but prior to the closing date, any ambiguities, discrepancies, inconsistencies, or conflicts between the SOW and other solicitation documents attached hereto or incorporated by reference. All questions shall be submitted to kyle.alcorn@navy.mil and teresa.brough@navy.mil within _14_ calendar days before the closing date of the solicitation.

1.3 Classification

This requirement is being solicited on a full and open competitive basis and the North American Industry

Classification (NAICS) code applicable to the requirements contained within this solicitation is 333314. The North American Industry Classification (NAIC) code 333314 is applicable to the requirements contained within this solicitation. The size standard for NAICS 333314 can be found at www.sba.gov.

1.4 Start Date

In order to allow for procurement lead time and a fair and equal evaluation of all proposals submitted under this competitive procurement, all proposals shall be based on a contract award date of September 2018. This date is only an estimate of the anticipated contract award date and will be used for the purpose of proposal evaluation only.

A definitive award date will be incorporated into the Contract document.

1.5 World Wide Web Solicitation Information

Some solicitations available posted on the WWW FedBizOpps site may not include all documents of the solicitation package. Drawings and Contract Data Requirement Lists (CDRLs) are examples of documents that may not be included due to technical issues. Under those circumstances, a notice will be provided with each solicitation package listing documents not available on WWW. Hard copies of the documents may be obtained by contacting the solicitation Point of Contact (POC) listed in the solicitation document.

Any amendments to the subject solicitation will be posted to the FedBizOpps http://www.fbo.gov . The complete solicitation package, including all amendments, should be received and reviewed prior to submitting a response. It is the responsibility of the offeror to obtain all amendments and/or other applicable documents prior to submission of the offer. Under these circumstances, offerors are reminded to include acknowledgement of acceptance of these amendments in their offer.

1.6 Use of Navy Support Contractors

Government support contractors may assist the Source Selection Organization with administrative support only. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the Cost/Price Analysis Team (CPAT) will be composed of Government employees only. However, the following Government support contractors may assist with administrative support.

Design To Deliver (D2D) Mayvin

The Navy has both hardware and information exclusion clauses as well as proprietary data protection clauses in Navy contracts with the above listed firms. Offeror shall provide written notification to the PCO no later than ten

(10) days after issuance of the RFP if Offeror does not consent to the use of any firm listed above in the proposal evaluation process. Otherwise, submission of a proposal will be considered consent to use support contractors.

1.7 Proposal Preparation Certification

In the event that any portion of the proposal is written by anyone who is not a bona fide employee of the firm submitting the proposal, a certificate to this effect shall be furnished which must be signed by an authorized official of the Offeror and shall indicate the person’s name, employment capacity, firm name, relationship of that firm to the Offeror, and which portion of the proposal was written by that person. This certificate requirement applies to both the prime and any subcontractors. The certification shall be provided in Volume I.

2.0 General

Award will be made under Solicitation No. N00164-18-R-JQ26 based on a best value source selection process. Proposals must be submitted by the solicitation closing date and time specified on the cover page of this solicitation, block (9). Offerors must comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal; proposals that do not comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal may render the Offeror ineligible for award.

2.1 Proposal General Guidance

Offerors should assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offerors' proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to consider other information as part of the evaluation of the past performance factor. The Contractor should not presume that data previously submitted, or presumed to be known (e.g., data or services previously submitted or performed for the Government), will be considered as part of the evaluation if it is not submitted in the proposal. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. Failure to conform to requirements of this solicitation may form the basis for rejection of the proposal.

General statements such as “the Offeror understands the method for performing the efforts (or any portion thereof) and can or will comply with the requirements of the solicitation” will not be considered sufficient.

Generic statements such as "straight forward engineering techniques" and the "highest quality control procedures” will not be considered to be sufficient to demonstrate the proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

The Offeror’s proposal must contain a precise description of all terms and conditions of the services and supplies offered and must address all topics described below. The information provided in the proposal shall appear in the same order as outlined herein.

2.2 Mailed or Commercial Delivery of Proposals.

Mailed or commercially delivered hard or soft copy proposals shall be sent to the address listed below and are due by the date and time in Block 8 on Page 1 of the solicitation.

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

KYLE ALCORN (3373)

BLDG 41 SE CENTRAL RECEIVING

300 HWY 361

CRANE, IN 47522-5001

TEL:812-854-6019

The contractor shall provide tracking information for all hard copy proposals and product samples submitted to kyle.alcorn@navy.mil and teresa.brough@navy.mil prior to the closing date/time in order to ensure proper handling of proposals.

Hand delivered proposals will not be accepted. All offers must be mailed via USPS or by overnight courier. If using an overnight courier, it is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the courier service has access to NSWC…