14RJQ26_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This amendment is hereby issued to amend clause 52.212-1 Addendum 3 proposal submitting instructions, electronic submission of proposals are not allow ed.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Apr-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00164-14-R-JQ26

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Apr-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Apr-2014

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

J. SWABY (812-854-5993)

BLDG. 3291

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00164-14-R-JQ26

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION 4.0 - CLAUSES & OTHER FULL TEXT INFORMATION

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 5.0 - INSTRUCTIONS & PROVISIONS

The following have been modified:

NOTE: The provision at 52.212-1 has been tailored (See Addendum 3).

ADDENDUM 3 52.212-1 TAILORING

A copy of the offeror's warranty shall be submitted with the initial offer.

WORLD WIDE WEB SOLICITATION INFORMATION

Some solicitations available posted on the WWW site may not include all documents of the solicitation package.

Drawings and Contract Data Requirement Lists (CDRLs) are examples of documents that may not be included due to technical issues. Under those circumstances, a notice will be provided with each solicitation package listing documents not available on WWW. Hard copies of the documents may be obtained by contacting the solicitation Point of Contact (POC) listed in the solicitation document.

Any amendments to the subject solicitation will be posted to the NSWC Crane Division WWW Page (http://www.crane.navy.mil/acquisition/synopcom.htm) beneath the applicable solicitation. The complete solicitation package, including all amendments, should be received and reviewed prior to submitting a response. It is the responsibility of the offeror to obtain all amendments and/or other applicable documents prior to submission of the offer. Under these circumstances, offerors are reminded to include acknowledgement of acceptance of these amendments in their offer.

Offerors are NOT AUTHORIZED to submit proposals via FACSIMILE.

The contractor’s proposal shall include the following:

Required Submittal Volume Number Technical Compliance Matrix/Capability Information (Performance Specification and Statement of Work)

Volume I

Completed Solicitation including pricing

Volume II

Past Performance Summaries & Matrix (Min 3, Max 5 references) Volume III (5 page limit for summary) (1 page limit for matrix)

General Information:

a) Offerors shall submit a list of names and telephone numbers of persons authorized to conduct negotiations.

b) Proposals shall not contain classified information.

c) Delivery& Submission Method:

1) Mailed or Commercial Delivery of Proposals. Mailed or commercially delivered proposals (hard and soft copy) shall be sent to the address in Block 7 of SF1449, Page 1 of the Solicitation and are due by the date and time in block nine (9) on page one (1) of the solicitation. Please notify the Contract Specialist at jeannie.swaby@navy.mil if a hard copy is being sent and provide a copy of the shipping label.

2) Offerors are NOT AUTHORIZED to submit proposals via Electronic Delivery.

3) A soft copy of the proposal must be provided on CD-ROMs/DVDs, read-only memory along with a hard copy proposal submission. Microsoft Office, word, presentation and spreadsheet products are preferred. Changes, as a result of negotiations, will be conformed on CD-ROMs/DVDs and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the left margin.

4) NSWC Crane will NOT accept facsimile proposals or proposals submitted via NECO.

d) Proposal Format. Format of the proposal volumes shall be as follows:

1) Text size shall be no smaller than what is equivalent to Microsoft Word, Times New Roman, 10 point, uncompressed font.

2) Pages shall be single sided, one and one half spaced, with a minimum of one inch margins on all sides.

Pages shall be dated and numbered sequentially by volume. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, “original” or copy number, solicitation identification, and the offeror's name.

3) Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with an explanation for each.

4) Elaborate format, color representations, and bindings are not desirable. Three-ring binders are preferred. The pages in the binders shall be easily removed and replaced to facilitate page changes.

Any pages that are changed (as the result of negotiations) should be of a different color (as specified by the Contracting Officer) and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page and/or circling if changing data in a chart. The offeror shall indicate the new date on revised pages.

5) Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used when necessary to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11 by 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume and count as one page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and schematics; not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs, and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 8 point, Times New Roman.

I. Technical

a) Offerors shall provide one (1) written proposal. As part of the written proposal offerors shall complete a matrix with lists all written Government requirements in the Statement of Work and Performance Specification. The Matrix should have the following four (4) recommended headings: STATEMENT OF

WORK/PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION PARAGRAPH NUMBER, DESCRIPTION, MEETS

REQUIREMENTS (Y/N), and NOTES. Under the notes column, the offeror is encouraged to reference attachement and/or the page number of technical proposal which elaborates on how the offeror is meeting the requirement.

b) The Technical Capability Information shall be submitted as Volume I, and shall be no more than 50 pages.

1. The technical capability information shall not contain any pricing or classified information.

2. Identify any “exceptions” to the TDP and Statement of Work and state precisely how the offered supplies/services differ from the TDP. Please Note the Government reserves the right to award on initial offor without discussions.

3. Electronic or hard copy of the following technical capability/compliance information in response to the requirements described in the solicitation in such detail to allow the Government to evaluate the proposal. This shall include:

Offeror shall describe system characteristics and performance with respect to the requirements specified in the Performance Specification. Provide documentation to demonstrate that the system meets each and every requirement specified in the Performance Specification.

Offeror shall describe its ability to comply with the Statement of Work requirements. The offeror shall include, at a minimum, high level descriptions of how the Offeror’s proposal will meet the Statement of Work requirements.

The offeror shall address all facets of proposed delivery order management and administration.

Describe the extent to which your company has identified and committed to provide for participation by small, small and disadvantaged businesses (SDB), woman owned businesses (WOB), historically black colleges and universities, or other minority institutions for the performance of this effort. The Offeror shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate that the tasks assigned the selected small and/or SDB and WOB subcontractors are meaningful in the sense that they will be performing functions important to the overall success of the program and also broaden the subcontractor's technical capability. The Offeror shall describe their management approach for enhancing small, SDB and WOB subcontractor's technical capability. Of special interest is the amount and type of work to be performed by the subcontractors. The Offeror shall explain the reasons for and advantages of selecting particular subcontractors. Performance shall be separate from subcontracting plans to be submitted by large businesses pursuant to FAR 52.219- 9, but must incorporate the goals stressed herein, if applicable.

Conformance to the requirements outlined in the SOW/Spec/Drawings/TDP.

c) Each technical proposal shall enable Government evaluating personnel to make a thorough evaluation and arrive at a sound determination as to whether or not the proposal will meet the requirements of the government. Each technical proposal shall be specific, detailed, and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate that the prospective contractor has a thorough knowledge and understanding of the requirements and has valid and practical solutions to technical problems. Statements that paraphrase the specifications/Statement of Work or attest that "standard procedures will be employed” are inadequate to demonstrate how the proposal complies with the requirements of the specification/Statement of Work.

II. Solicitation/Pricing

a) Offerors shall submit completed signed solicitation packages, with all representations and certifications executed, and with prices in Section 1.0.

b) Offerors shall submit prices for items listed in Section “1.0”. The prices shall include all shipping and be proposed f.o.b. destination. The prices are to be provided as separate unit prices for each line item listed.

III. Past Performance

a) The Past Performance portion of the proposal shall be submitted as Volume III, and shall be a maximum of five (5) pages for the narrative summary and 1 page for the matrix.

b) The offeror shall provide a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) past performance references.

The offeror shall contact past performance references directly and request that they complete and submit the CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET in CNIN- K-0001 below to the address in Block 9 of SF 1449, Page 1 of the Solicitation or to jeannie.swaby@navy.mil in accordance with the timeline set forth in Block 8 of SF 1449, Page 1 of the Solicitation. The completed questionnaires shall be sent directly from the reference POC to the contract specialist, Jeannie Swaby. Under no circumstances shall the questionnaires be returned to the offerors. Any information provided by the offeror’s references is subject to verification/validation by the Government during the evaluation process. In the event references are not received by the close of the solicitation, the Government may make contact and follow up with the listed references from the Contractor Performance Data Matrix.

c) Offeror shall provide a one (1) page Contractor Performance Data Matrix identifying the following information for each of the Past Performance Questionnaire sent out:

1) Organization/Customer

2) Brief Description

3) Contract Number

4) Telephone & E-mail of Organization/Customer Point of Contact (POC)

The offeror’s matrix shall contain a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) references to contracts that are recent and relevant to this requirement. Proposals must prove PPQs have been sent to each POC; Failure to send the PPQ to each POC will be considered a proposal deficiency and may result in exclusion of the offeror’s proposal from consideration for award. The offeror shall exert its best efforts to ensure that at least two POCs per relevant contract submit a completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the Government.

d) Up to five (5) one page summaries of each contract reference identified in the past performance summary matrix may be submitted. Offerors should include a discussion of any significant achievements and explain any Past Performance problems that it considers relevant to the proposed efforts. Offerors should also discuss past and present efforts to identify and manage program risk.

e) Delivery of Same or Similar XRBS Systems. The offeror shall describe in terms of years and extent of experience its past performance in providing the same or similar XRBS Systems as set forth in the solicitation. Explain how the offeror’s past performance in providing the maintenance and repair of XRBS Systems and components set forth in the solicitation minimizes the Government’s risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

f) For the purposes of this solicitation, current contracts are defined as those on which performance occurred during the last three (3) years. In determining relevancy, the offeror should consider the type and value of the contract, and the type of requirement compared to this solicited requirement. The offeror should also consider the level or amount of effort. Only past performance dealing with manufacture, test, inspection, packaging and delivery of X-Ray Baggage Scanner Systems will be considered relevant.

The offeror must detail (if using the “related technology” as a reference) how the “related technology” is applicable to the solicited effort. Should the offeror not explain how the related technology is applicable, the reference may not be considered relevant. If an offeror has no current or relevant past performance information, they should so state that in this volume.

g) Describe how you have resolved corporate/customer differences and/or contract problems/disputes for the past three years. Cite specific examples. Explain past performance in satisfactorily resolving any performance problems that arose during performance of a delivery order.

h) Each offeror shall submit present and past performance information for itself on projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity. The Offerors may choose to submit present and past performance information for major proposed subcontractors, team members, and/or joint venture partners that have experience in projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity with its proposal. The total number of past performance references for each offeror shall not exceed five (including any references submitted by subcontractors, team members and/or joint ventures). This volume shall provide a list of current and relevant contracts on which the offeror has performed in the format requested in the Proposal Requirements portion of this document. This information, as well as other information the Government may obtain elsewhere via Government databases (CPARs, PPIRs etc.) and other government agencies (DCMA, DCAA etc.), will be used to evaluate the offeror's past performance. The Government reserves the right to solicit feedback beyond what is identified in the questionnaire. NO CLASSIFIED PAST PERFORMANCE SUPPLEMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED. The offeror may submit performance on classified programs as long as that information can be verified. If the offeror intends to submit in this manner the information that is classified (customer, contract number, etc.) should be marked “reserved” and the description/write up of the work performed shall remain unclassified. If the offeror cannot describe what work was accomplished in an unclassified manner they cannot submit that program for evaluation. Offerors are notified that the Government will use the data provided in this volume that is determined to be current and relevant to the effort at hand and data obtained from other sources in the development of performance risk assessments.

EXCEPTIONS

Offerors are not encouraged to take exceptions to this solicitation, however, any exceptions taken to the specifications, statement of work, performance work statement or terms and conditions of this solicitation shall be explained in detail and set forth in a cover letter as well as in the cost proposal. Offerors are to detail the particular section, clause paragraph and page to which they are taking exception. The Government reserves the right to award on initial offers without discussions and exceptions to the written technical requirements may result in an offeror’s proposal being found technically unacceptable.

Other:

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET – In addition to responding to the above Past performance Factor and Subfactors, the contractor shall complete SEPARATELY the Contractor performance Data Sheet in the solicitation for each reference being submitted. Failure to submit the completed form shall be considered certification (by signature on the proposal) that the contractor has no past performance for like or similar items for the Government to evaluate.

Offeror’s shall submit their best offer initially, as the Government reserves the right to award on initial offers. The Government plans to award one contract as a result of this solicitation.

CNIN-K-0001 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE DATA

The offeror shall demonstrate past performance through completion of the "Contractor Performance Data Sheet".

The Contractor Performance Data Sheet shall be completed in its entirety. Additionally, offerors are urged to submit brief and concise responses, within the confines of the space allotted. Failure to submit the completed Contractor Performance Data Sheet (along with the proposal) shall be considered certification (by signature on the proposal) that the contractor has no past performance for like or similar items for the Government to evaluate.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET

NOTE: THE INFORMATION PROVIDED MAY BE USED TO EVALUATE THE OFFEROR'S PAST

PERFORMANCE IN MEETING COSTS/PRICE, TECHNICAL, AND DELIVERY OBJECTIVES. POINTS OF

CONTACT PROVIDED, MAY BE CONTACTED TO CONFIRM INFORMATION PROVIDED AND TO

GATHER INFORMATION ON TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE, QUALITY, LIFE CYCLE COST AND/OR

RELIABILITY. THE RESULTS MAY BE USED IN THE OVERALL COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF

THE OFFEROR (S) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION M OF THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Please list performance data on a minimum of three and a maximum of five contracts for like or similar items, either completed or ongoing, under which performance has taken place within the last three years. Contracts with the federal government are preferred, but you may also list contracts with state and local governments or contracts with commercial customers. In determining which contracts to submit, please refer to FAR 15. 305(a)(2)(I), which states in pertinent part that “[p]ast performance information is one indicator of an offeror's ability to perform the contract successfully. The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance shall be considered in making the award decision…”. The Government reserves the right to not consider any information submitted exceeding the five-contract limitation.

Contractor Name: RFP #:

Address: POC: (Person who can verify data)

Telephone:

Division: FAX:

CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number: Date Completed:

Contract Type: Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Specify) Item Description:

Contract Quantity/Length of Service:

Customer Name: Customer POC: (Person who can verify data) Address: Telephone:

FAX:

QUALITY

NOTE: An explanation must accompany all answers with an asterisk(*).

Was consideration or a monetary withhold for non-conforming supplies/services or late deliveries assessed against this contract?

YES* NO (Explanation)

Was/is any part of this contract terminated for default and/or litigation?

YES* NO (Explanation)

Was any warranty work completed on delivered items?

YES* NO (Explanation)

Did you receive any quality awards in the past three years?

YES* NO (List Awards)

TIMELINESS

Were all items (including products, services, reports, etc.) delivered within the original contract schedule?

YES NO * (Explanation)

COST FOR COST TYPE CONTRACTS:

Was the original contract estimated cost met?

YES NO* (Explanation)

If the estimated cost was not met, what was the positive/negative percentage of change?

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

Describe any corrective action(s) initiated to solve any of the above-described problems/deficiencies on this contract. Discuss the success of the corrective action(s) taken.

(End of Summary of Changes)