14RJN04_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The reason for this amendment is to address a change in requirements and to provide answ ers to technical questions. See pages 2-3 for details. The closing date of this solicitation remains 02 DEC 2013, 3:00 PM local time.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Nov-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00164-14-R-JN04

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Oct-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Nov-2013

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

K. FRENTZ (812-854-5928)

BLDG 3422

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00164-14-R-JN04

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

NOTE: Line items 0009, 0010 and 0011 are hereby deleted from this solicitation. These items are no longer required by the Government.

TECHNICAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS:

The following questions have been submitted to the Government regarding the NSWC CCA Motherboard Sample.

The Government response follows each question.

Question 1: LED Concerns

LN1371SG-(TR)

LED GREEN S TYPE LOW CUR SMD T/R

Part has been obsoleted by manufacturer with no direct replacement.

LN1471SY-(TR)

LED AMBER S TYPE LOW CUR SMD T/R

Part has been obsoleted by manufacturer with no direct replacement.

Answer: For the LEDs that follow, we understand they are obsolete. However, there are enough available on the open market to complete the sample board. Please use the specified part. If there is a problem finding sources, please let us know and we can give some options.

***The following are acceptable substitutions 4816P-T02-223 to 4816P-T02-223LF 4816P-T02-103 to 4816P-T02-103LF 4816P-T01-103 to 4816P-T01-103LF 4816P-T01-562 to 4816P-T01-562LF MAX3485EESA to MAX3485EESA+

Question 2: Bareboard Concerns

Copper Layer A/W Issues

a. Top and bottom copper layers as well as in2, in3 and in4 have pads located at all non plated hole locations. The diameter is larger than the drill, to avoid leaving exposed copper in hole walls, may we remove all pads at non plated hole locations? If this is not acceptable please indicate exposed copper is acceptable.

Answer: Removing pads at non plated hole locations is acceptable.

b. Our manufacturing minimum for plated hole to copper is .008", layers POWER, GROUND and IN1 has this space down to .0064" plated hole to copper. May we pull the copper pour (verified to not affect form fit or function, or netlist)? This edit will improve yields and long term reliability.

N00164-14-R-JN04

Answer: Changing the spacing from .0064" to .008" is fine as long as you do not affect form, fit, function or netlist.

c. Stackup: Concerned that the stack up with 3 plane layers together then 3 signal layers together will result in excessive warpage. Would it be permissible to try to balance these some, alternating signal and plane? If not may we waive warp call out (note 9) on Drawing?

Answer: Stackup change is fine as long as TOP and BOTTOM are unaffected.

d. Drawing Issues: some dimensional discrepancies in board dimensions. Lower left hole to edge, the supplied outline measures 0.20" hole to lower edge which works with the overall dimension. DWG sheet 1 shows 0.19" and fabrication layer included in gerber data shows .188" both of which do not work with the 4.25" over all dimension. May we redline the drawings to match supplied data (0.20") to match supplied data?

Answer: The critical dimension is that the holes be 3.880 +/-tolerance apart. If the board was exactly 4.25 it would put the center of holes .185 from the side instead of .19 (rounded in CAD).

e. Netlist Problem: No cad netlist was included, will it be acceptable to test using gerber extracted netlist?

Answer: Gerber Extracted Netlist is acceptable.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.