N00039-18-R-0060-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to make the revisions identif ied in the follow ing pages. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Apr-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00039-18-R-0060

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Mar-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Apr-2018

CODE

COMMANDER, SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE

SYSTEMS COMMAND

02 CONTRACTS

4301 PACIFIC HIGHWAY

SAN DIEGO CA 92110-3127

N00039 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00039-18-R-0060

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

SECTION J

EXHIBIT/ATTACHMENT

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION

Exhibit A DD 1423, Dated 11 APR 2018

Attachment 1A Incentive Fee Plan, Dated 24 OCT 2017

Attachment 1B Final Fee or Profit Determination Formula, Dated 09 NOV 2017

Attachment 2 Personnel Qualifications, Dated 06 NOV 2017

Attachment 3 Statement of Work, Dated 11 APR 2018

Attachment 4 DD Form 254, Dated 24 MAY 2017

Attachment 5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan, Dated 29 MAR 2018

Attachment 6 Proposed Ceiling Distribution (to be deleted at award)

Attachment 7 Reference Information Sheet (to be deleted at award)

Attachment 8 Small Business Participation Data (to be deleted at award)

Attachment 9 Past Performance Questionnaire (to be deleted at award)

Attachment 10 Proposal Checklist (to be deleted at award)

Attachment 11 Proposal Ratings Guide (to be deleted at award)

Attachment 12 Gate Review Matrix (to be deleted at award)

Attachment 13 CENTCOM Clauses Afghanistan

Attachment 14 Price Risk Model (to be deleted at award)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

L-317 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS (COMPLEX) (JUL 1999)

(a) Proposals shall be submitted within the page limitations set forth in the following table prior to the proposal due date:

Volume Section Submission Requirements Page Limitation Evaluation

Factor

Volume I –

Written

Capability

Information

Section A No more than ten (10) Reference

Information Sheets (RIS)

(Attachment 7) -

L317(b)(3)(A)(i)

RIS (ATT 7) – maximum 10 pages

Minimum Gate

Requirement –

M307(c)(2)

Up to 2 supporting pages per RIS

– L317(b)(3)(A)(i)

RIS Supporting Pages – maximum 20 pages total, 2 pages maximum per RIS

Gate Review Matrix (Attachment

12) – L317(b)(3)(A)(i)

Matrix – Not counted

Signed cover sheet(s) from letter(s) of commitment. –

L317(b)(3)(A)(i)

Letter of Commitment Cover

Sheet – Not counted.

Section B No more than ten (10) Reference

Information Sheets (RIS)

(Attachment 7) (Using same RIS from Volume I, Section A)

RIS (ATT 7) – maximum 10 pages

Factor 2 –

M307(d)(2)(ii)

Up to 2 supporting pages per RIS

(Using same supporting pages from Volume I, Section A)

RIS Supporting Pages – maximum 20 pages total, 2 pages maximum per RIS

Up to 10 Past Performance

Questionnaires (Attachment 9), one per RIS, L317(b)(3)(ii)

Past Performance

Questionnaires – maximum of

10 pages

Section C Small Business Participation Data

(Attachment 8)

None Minimum Gate

Requirement –

M307(c)(3)

Factor 3 –

M307(d)(3) Signed cover sheet(s) from letter(s) of commitment, L317(b)(3)(iii)

Volume II –

Cost

Related

Information

Section A Ceiling Distribution Proposal

(Attachment 6)- L317(b)(3)(B)(i)

& L317(b)(3)(D)(v)

None None (M-307 (c)

Merits of the offer)

Section B Accounting Systems Information

– L317(b)(3)(B)(ii)

None None (M-307 (c)

Merits of the offer)

Volume III

– Offeror

Information

Section A Contract Forms- RFP page 1

(SF33), with blocks 12-18 completed and acknowledgment of any amendments.

None None (M-307 (c)

Merits of the offer)

Section B Reps and Certs- L317(b)(3)(C) None None

RFP Section K (Responsibility)

Section C Unconditional Assent to RFP

Terms and Conditions-

L317(b)(3)(C)

None None (M-307 (c)

Merits of the offer)

Section D Information from L-343 and

Small Business Subcontracting

Plan- L317(b)(3)(C) and FAR

Clause 52.219-9 Alt 2

None None

(Responsibility)

Section E Response to Provision 252.227-

7017 Data Assertions List -

L317(b)(3)(C)

None None (M-307 (c)

Merits of the offer)

Section F OCI Disclosure Information-

L317(b)(3)(C)

None None

(Responsibility)

Section G Cross-reference list for offeror’s labor categories and position descriptions compared to

Government labor categories-

RFP Section C, Clause 5252.237-

None None (M-307 (c)

Merits of the offer)

Section H Corporate Information-

L317(b)(3)(C)

None None

(Responsibility)

Proposals shall be prepared and submitted as follows:

(1) VOLUME I, Written Capability Information:

Page Limitations: As specified in L-317(b)(3)(A).

The proposal cover page, table of contents pages, and separation pages between Sections will not be counted toward the page limitation. Any pages exceeding the limitations identified in L-317(b)(3)(A) will not be evaluated. Only the required documentation for Sections A, B, and C shall be submitted. The cover page shall list the proposal validity period. The Government requires a validity period extending to at least 270 calendar days after the closing date of the RFP.

Section A – Relevant Organizational Experience (Corresponding Evaluation Factor - Minimum Gate

Requirement)

Section B – Organizational Past Performance (As specified in Provision L-325)(Corresponding

Evaluation Factor - FACTOR 2)

Section C – Extent of Participation of Small Business (Corresponding Evaluation Factor - Minimum

Gate Requirement and FACTOR 3)

(2) VOLUME II, Cost Related Information:

Page Limitation: None for each section.

Section A – Ceiling Distribution Proposal (Attachment 6)

Section B – Accounting System Information

(3) VOLUME III, Offeror Information:

Page Limitation: None for each section.

Section A – Contract Forms

– SF 33 (with blocks 12-18 completed)

– Acknowledge all material amendments (if any amendments are subsequently issued)

Section B – Representation and Certifications – RFP Section K and a statement confirming that the

Contractor’s Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) is current.

Section C – Unconditional Assent to RFP Terms and Conditions

Section D – L-343 Contractor Responsibility and Small Business Subcontracting Plan (if applicable, may be submitted as a .pdf)

Section E – Response to Provision 252.227-7017

Section F – OCI Disclosure Information

Section G – As specified in 5252.237-9600, Offerors shall provide its normally used nomenclature for each labor category identified in Attachment 2, together with a copy of the offeror’s own position description for each labor category

Section H – Corporate Information - A copy of the offeror’s:

(a) Most current purchasing system review;

(b) Most current estimating system review;

(c) Most current property system approval;

(d) Name and address of DSS office;

(e) DUNS Number, Tax Identification Number, and Cage Code

Offerors that successfully pass the minimum gate requirements and receive an oral presentation notification shall submit a proposal in accordance with the following table by the proposal due date specified in the notification.

Evaluation Factor Section Page Limitation

Factor 1 - Technical and Management

Capability –

M307(d)(1)

Orals See time limits in L-317(b)(3)(D)(iii)

Written Maximum of 2 pages per question, 6 pages maximum total; L-317(b)(3)(E)

(4) TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY (Corresponding Evaluation Factor - FACTOR 1):

Page Limitation: As specified in L-317(b)(3)(E)

Offerors shall be required to demonstrate Technical and Management Capability both orally and in writing. This evaluation will involve an oral presentation as described in Paragraph (b)(3)(D) and a written submission as described in Paragraph (b)(3)(E) of this provision. The written submission will be incorporated into the contract.

(b) Format, Organization, and Content

(1) Format

(A) Each volume must contain sufficient information to permit a detailed evaluation. Data previously submitted, if any, will not be used in the evaluation of your response to this Request for Proposal. Previously submitted data shall not therefore be included in your proposal “by reference.”

(B) All pages shall be prepared using Times New Roman 12-point font, with the exception of tables, charts, graphs, and spreadsheets which shall be prepared using no smaller than Times New Roman 9-point font.

Additionally, all pages shall be prepared using single spacing, single-sided, 8 ½” x11”sized paper. For charts only, fold-outs using 11” X 17” sized paper are allowed and shall be counted as one page. Offerors should assume the

Government evaluators will be reviewing all submittals in a black and white format; therefore, offerors are responsible for ensuring the legibility of all tables, charts, etc., when printed/copied using black and white printers/copiers.

(C) No cost or pricing information shall be included in the technical proposal. Offers which do not present sufficient information to permit complete technical evaluation by the Government may be rejected. If proposal submissions contain assumptions and exceptions, the Government reserves the right to reject the proposal at its discretion.

(D) Proprietary data contained in the proposal shall be specifically identified.

(2) Organization

(A) The proposal shall be organized into the volumes, sections, and page limitations specified in L-

317(b)(3)(A).

(B) Pages shall be numbered consecutively within each section, showing volume, section, and page.

As an example, page 19 of Section B of Volume I would be numbered I-B-19.

(3) Content

(A) VOLUME I, WRITTEN CAPABILITY INFORMATION

(i) ) Section A, Relevant Organizational Experience: A maximum of thirty (30) pages are allowed for this section, however, the number of total pages allowed are determined by the number of Reference

Information Sheets submitted by the offeror. Offerors shall complete a separate Reference Information Sheet (RFP attachment 7) for each referenced contract identifying organizational experience similar to the requirements delineated in the SOW for the key areas of the SOW listed below. Where the contract reference is for a task order(s) under an IDIQ contract, offerors shall identify only the experience for the value of the task order(s) that are relevant to this procurement based on the key SOW areas listed below. Therefore, while offerors may identify multiple task orders under an IDIQ contract as one reference, offerors shall only claim the value of the entire IDIQ contract if all of the task orders issued under the IDIQ contract are relevant to this procurement based on the key SOW areas listed below. Offerors claiming multiple task orders under an IDIQ contract as one reference shall also provide a separate sheet (which will not count toward the page limitation) identifying the task order numbers and values for each task order. In accordance with the instructions provided in Block 15 of the Reference Information Sheet (Attachment 7), additional pages (one side of a printed page is one page) may be submitted as follows:

A maximum of two (2) additional pages to address shore installation experience.

No more than ten (10) total Reference Information Sheets may be submitted per proposal. Including additional pages, a total of thirty (30) pages may be submitted. The same contract may be used to address more than one key area of the SOW; however, offerors shall not provide a consolidated response for multiple key areas of the SOW and shall clearly format their proposal to separate the discussion for each key area of the SOW identified below. In evaluating the capability of each offeror for each key area of the SOW, the Government will consider only the text designated in that section for that particular key area of the SOW. Offerors shall address each of the key areas of the

SOW. The key areas of the SOW are listed below in descending order based on the anticipated amount of work to be performed under the prospective contract:

KEY AREAS OF THE SOW

(A) Experience in SOW Para 3.4 *

(B) Experience in SOW Para 3.3 *

(C) Experience in SOW Para 3.5 *

*SOW Paragraph reference is inclusive of all subparagraphs.

Offerors shall complete RFP Attachment 12 “Gate Review Matrix” to summarize the cumulative value of all referenced contracts/task orders. Only one Matrix shall be completed per offeror. The number of pages submitted shall correspond to the number of referenced contracts and/or task orders. The matrix will not count against the page limitation for this volume. No additional information shall be included in the Gate Review Matrix. Any edits of the document excluding the addition of rows for additional referenced contracts and/or task orders will not be evaluated.

Each prime contractor shall also submit the cover sheet from each letter of commitment with each proposed subcontractor. Each letter of commitment shall detail the teaming agreement between the prime contractor and each proposed subcontractor submitted as a reference, but only the signed cover sheet is required. The cover sheet(s) shall be signed by both parties, and shall provide the subcontract amount, the type of contract and the period of performance. The cover sheet(s) will not count against the page limitations for this volume.

If work other than shore C4ISR installation or other like shore electronic systems installation was also accomplished under the referenced contract, offerors shall not include the “other than” installation work in the dollar totals or claim it as relevant experience. The Government will validate the claims of installation work where determined to be necessary.

(ii) Section B, Organizational Past Performance: Past performance information shall be submitted in accordance with Provision L-325. The Government will evaluate the RFP Attachment 7, Reference

Information Sheet/past performance data for work performed after January 30, 2012, provided by offerors, and obtained from other sources against the criteria listed in Section M.

(iii) Section C, Extent of Participation of Small Business: All Prime offerors (Large AND

Small businesses) shall submit a completed RFP Attachment 8, Small Business Participation Data. Offerors will be evaluated on the extent of participation of small businesses in terms of the total acquisition value of this contract.

(See Provision M-307 for the minimum required ratio of Direct Labor to ODCs as it relates to the Minimum Gate criteria.) Small business primes are to include their own planned effort. In addition to RFP Attachment 8, each prime contractor (whether a small or large business) shall submit the cover sheet from each letter of commitment with each proposed small business subcontractor. The cover sheet(s) shall be signed by both parties, and shall provide the subcontract amount, and the amount of the subcontract allocated to Direct Labor Hours and ODCs.

Each letter of commitment shall detail the teaming agreement between the prime contractor and each proposed small business subcontractor, but only the signed cover sheet is required. The small business subcontracting plan, which is only required from large businesses, is a separate requirement and is in addition to the information required to evaluate this factor.

(B) VOLUME II, COST RELATED INFORMATION

(i) Section A, Ceiling Distribution Proposal: Offerors shall submit a completed RFP

Attachment 6, Ceiling Distribution Proposal. Attachment 6 shall be used by the offeror to annotate the distribution of ceiling amongst the prime and all subcontractors.

(ii) Section B, Accounting Systems Information: In order to be issued a cost-reimbursement contract, as required by FAR 16.301-3, contractors must have an accounting system adequate for determining costs applicable to the contract. Offerors are required to provide the report(s) for the prime and any subcontractors that will utilize CPFF, FPIF, CPIF, or Cost-reimbursement pricing showing the Government’s determination of the offeror’s accounting system adequacy. For subcontractors that prefer to submit accounting system information directly to the Government (rather than to the prime), information may be submitted to Sharla van Bramer at sharla.vanbramer@navy.mil by the closing date and time specified in block 9 of page 1 of this solicitation. If unavailable, other information pertinent to accounting system adequacy may be submitted. All subcontractors with an accounting system that has not been deemed adequate by the Government shall be proposed as a FFP proposal.

Any prime and/or subcontractors that will utilize CPFF, FPIF, CPIF, or Cost-reimbursement pricing, where the accounting system has not been deemed adequate by the Government for accumulating cost type contracts, may be considered only in the event the Government determines that discussions are in the Government's best interest and only for those offerors determined to be in the competitive range. At such time, should discussions be required, offerors will be afforded the opportunity to comply with existing instructions or be eliminated from further consideration.

mailto:sharla.vanbramer@navy.mil

(C) VOLUME III, OFFEROR INFORMATION

This volume provides for all other miscellaneous contractual items delineated above in this provision under L-

317(a)(3). Offers must communicate the offeror’s unconditional agreement to the terms and conditions in this RFP, including any attachments and documents incorporated by reference. The Government’s acceptance of an offer creates a binding contract between the Government and the offeror. Failure or refusal to assent to any of the terms and conditions of this RFP, the imposition of additional conditions, or any material omission may constitute a deficiency which may render an offer unacceptable, and which may only be corrected through discussions (see FAR

15.306(d)).

The Government intends to award a contract without discussions as permitted by FAR 15.306(a) and 52.215-1.

Therefore, offerors are advised against submitting an offer which takes exception to any term or condition of this

RFP or imposes any additional condition or omits any required information, without first consulting the Contracting

Officer. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions and to permit offerors to revise their proposals if it is in the Government’s interests to do so.

Organization Conflict of Interest (OCI) Disclosure: Any contract resulting from this solicitation will provide for a full spectrum of C4ISR installation services for all Shore C4ISR and supporting systems, current and future, under the cognizance of SPAWAR as provided in the Statement of Work (Attachment 3). Performing this effort may result in a potential Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) as defined by FAR 2.101 and FAR 9.5. The term

"contractor" means the contractor, its subsidiaries and affiliates, joint ventures involving the contractor, any entity with which the contractor may hereafter merge or affiliate, and any other successor of the contractor. Contactor support services for the Global Installation Contract (GIC) are provided under various SPAWAR task orders and contracts. “Support Services” are services provided to support and assist a program office or staff code with their acquisition responsibilities, including but not limited to, program management support services, preparing program budget submissions, business financial reporting or accounting services, data collection and reporting, general administration, performance and earned value monitoring; or advisory and assistance services including but not limited to consultant services, requirements analysis and planning, contract management, systems engineering and technical direction, logistics management, information technology management, test and evaluation, production and installation management. Companies providing contractor support services are involved in the development of or have access to information concerning installation requirements and related documentation for GIC, including procurement or other contractor sensitive information which could create an OCI or perceived OCI that cannot be mitigated. Due to the potential for OCIs created, companies providing related installation support services will not be permitted to participate as a team member on the GIC. Such participation could result in the exclusion of the company’s proposal, or the proposal of their prime contractor teammate, from task order competition.

The Contracting Officer has the sole authority to determine whether an organizational conflict of interest exists and whether it can be avoided or mitigated. It is the Government's policy to avoid, neutralize, or mitigate potential conflicts as early in the acquisition process as possible. All OCIs must be resolved (avoided, neutralized or mitigated) prior to award.

(i) ALL OFFERORS SHALL SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING, REGARDLESS OF POTENTIAL OCI

DETERMINATION: Offerors shall identify and describe any contractual support they or any affiliate, joint venture or subcontractor under this solicitation are presently providing to PEO C41, SPAWAR, SPAWAR Systems Center

(SSC) Atlantic, SSC Pacific, or any other activity, where that support relates to C4I installation support services.

The offeror shall include: (1) the name of the contractor, joint venture, affiliate, or subcontractor; (2) the contracting agency; (3) contract number; (4) a short description of the work; and (5) whether the offeror believes that the support results in an OCI. Offerors shall specifically address why they believes no OCI exists (if applicable).

(ii) Offerors shall provide an OCI Disclosure Analysis to address the following, as applicable:

(1) Whether by virtue of the contracts listed in response to section (a), the contractor has had access to non-public information that may provide an unfair advantage in competing for some or all of the proposed effort; or whether by virtue of the contracts listed in response to section (a), the contractor was in a position to set the ground rules for this solicitation, and thereby affect the competition.

(2) Whether by virtue of the contracts listed in response to section (a), the contractor will be in a situation of evaluating its own services if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation. Offeror shall specifically address the situation where impaired objectivity arises because of the relationship between work previously awarded to the contract and work arising under this solicitation.

(3) How the contractor will identify and avoid actual or potential OCIs during performance.

(D) TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY, ORAL PRESENTATION

(i) Schedule and Location for presentations. Oral presentations will be scheduled with offerors as soon as possible after the closing date for receipt of proposals. At a minimum, the offerors will be given two (2) weeks’ notice of the date for their presentations. The order in which offerors will make their presentations will be determined by a lottery performed by the Contracting Officer. Once notified of their scheduled presentation date and time, offerors shall complete their oral presentations on the scheduled date and time. Requests from offerors to reschedule their presentations will generally not be considered. Oral Presentations may be rescheduled as determined necessary at the sole discretion of the Contracting Officer. Offerors will make their oral presentations in person in the greater San Diego area at the location identified by the Government in the notification letter.

(ii) Content and Purpose of Oral presentation. At the date and time scheduled for the oral presentation, offerors will be provided written questions. The questions will address both general and specific facets of shore installations. Offerors shall be prepared to address questions related to technical and management aspects such as quality and cost controls, management of personnel and schedules, retention, attrition, and the execution of installations. The questions and offeror responses are intended to provide the Government a thorough understanding of the depth and breadth of the offeror’s technical and management capability applicable to the installation services being procured under this solicitation. Offerors shall present information that clearly demonstrates its knowledge and understanding of the technical requirements of the solicitation’s Statement of Work (SOW), as well as the technical issues, problems, challenges and possible solutions associated with the envisioned work.

(iii) Time allotted for Oral Presentations. Each oral presentation is expected to last no more than approximately six (6) six hours. Offerors will have three (3) uninterrupted hours to conduct a preparation session for their oral presentation. Offerors will be provided a maximum of ten (10) minutes to introduce their presentation team members (name, position, and company affiliation). This introduction will not be evaluated by the Government, and will take place prior to the oral presentation. Offerors will then be provided an uninterrupted two (2) hours in which to conduct their oral presentation. Following the oral presentation, the Government will hold a fifteen (15) minute Government-only caucus. After the caucus, the Government reserves the right to hold a clarification period of up to thirty (30) minutes, or if no clarifications are required, the Government will conclude the oral presentation.

Time allotted for Oral Presentations

Offeror Preparation Session for Oral Presentation 180 minutes

Offeror Introduction of the Oral Presentation Team 10 minutes

Oral Presentation 120 minutes

Government-only Caucus 15 minutes

Clarification Period (only if required) 30 minutes

NOTE: Offerors are responsible for their own timekeeping for their presentation. The Government will not consider any material presented beyond the time limits stated in the table above.

(iv) Media. The Government will provide note cards, pens, permanent markers and blank flipchart paper for the offeror’s presentation team to use during the preparation session and the presentations.

Presentation teams will not be allowed to bring notes, references or other presentation materials for use during the preparation session or the presentation. The Government will not accept for evaluation any documentation produced either prior to or after the offeror’s presentation team’s preparation session, regardless of whether it is referenced during the presentation. The Government will not provide any computer hardware and/or software, nor will the offeror be permitted to bring any computer hardware and/or software. The presentation team will not be allowed to use any communication devices or any other outside equipment/materials at any time during the offeror’s preparation session or the presentation. Audio and/or video recordings of the presentation will be conducted by the

Government for documentation, evaluation, and record keeping purposes. At the close of the Oral Presentation, the offeror shall provide the Contracting Officer all flipcharts and/or notes used during the Oral Presentation. Offerors will not be permitted to make copies, electronic or paper, of any presentation material generated during the presentation.

(v) Offeror’s presentation team. A maximum of seven (7) personnel representing each prime/subcontractor team may participate in developing the oral presentation. Only the two (2) key personnel specified in the offeror’s proposal will be authorized to brief the Government team. Each of the seven (7) personnel participating in the oral presentation shall be proposed as one (1) Full Time Equivalent (FTE) committed to this contract, and specifically named in Attachment 6. Offerors shall provide a summary of the Oral Presentation team including each participant’s full name, labor category proposed, company, and percent committed to this contract as proposed. Summaries shall be provided to the Contracting Officer in accordance with direction provided at the time offerors are notified of their scheduled Oral Presentation. One (1) additional person may attend and participate in the ten (10) minute introductory period prior to the oral presentation; however, the additional person will not be permitted to participate in any part of the oral presentation or preparation session. The additional person need not be

100 percent committed. Personnel shall not attend more than one oral presentation or preparation session for oral presentations resulting from this solicitation.

(vi) Exchanges with Offerors. No questions will be permitted during Oral Presentations. The

Government will not inform offerors regarding any strengths, weaknesses, or deficiencies identified at any time during or at the conclusion of Oral Presentations. Following completion of the Oral Presentation, the Government may seek clarification from the offeror on any points addressed. All such exchanges between the offeror and the

Government shall be solely for clarification purposes, and offerors will not be permitted to change their responses or revise their presentations. Oral Presentations and exchanges shall not constitute discussions within the meaning of

FAR 15.306(d), nor obligate the Government to conduct discussions, or entertain any revisions to an offer.

(E) TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY, WRITTEN

(i) The content of the written portion the Technical and Management Capability Factor will be communicated in the invitation for the oral presentation. The questions shall address the relevant experience of Key

Personnel with regard to performing the tasks of the SOW, and questions similar to the ones described in Section L for oral presentations. Upon receipt of the invitation, offerors will have seven (7) calendar days to respond to three

(3) questions and submit the written answers electronically. Offerors will be allowed a maximum of two (2) pages to respond to each question, for a total written submission of six (6) pages.

(ii) Offerors shall not submit a response to the written portion of the Technical and

Management Capability Factor until instructed to do so, as requested by the invitation to participate in an oral presentation. Offerors’ proposals determined not to meet the Minimum Gate requirements as described in Provision

M-307 will not receive an invitation to participate in oral presentations and will not receive the questions for the written portion of the Technical and Management Capability Factor.

(End of provision)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M-307 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD (BEST VALUE) (DEC 1999)--ALTERNATE I

(JAN 2004)

(a) The Government intends to make a contract award to each and all qualifying offerors. “Qualifying offeror” is defined as an offeror that is determined to be a responsible source, submits a technically acceptable proposal that conforms to the requirements of the solicitation, and the contracting officer has no reason to believe would be likely to offer other than fair and reasonable pricing. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

(b) The Government intends to competitively award multiple Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts utilizing the process of evaluation and evaluation criteria described herein. In accordance with Class

Deviation 2018-O0006, which implements Section 825 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for

Fiscal Year 2017, the Government will not evaluate cost or price for the IDIQ contract. Cost or price to the

Government will be considered in conjunction with the issuance of a task or delivery order under any contract awarded hereunder.

(c) Merits of the Offer: The Government will determine the merits of each offer on the basis of acceptability. The acceptability determination will be made prior to evaluation of the evaluation factors. Proposals determined to be unacceptable will not be further evaluated.

(1) The Government will determine the acceptability of each offer, on a pass or fail basis, by evaluating the consistency of the offeror’s proposal with the terms and conditions of the RFP. Additionally, the offeror shall meet the “Minimum Gate” requirements for “Relevant Organizational Experience” and “Extent of Participation of Small

Business” listed below in order to be determined acceptable. An offer will be determined to be acceptable when it meets the requirements for “Relevant Organizational Experience” and “Extent of Participation of Small Business” and manifests the offeror’s agreement, without exception or imposition of additional conditions, to the terms and conditions of the RFP, including all attachments and documents incorporated by reference. An offeror’s failure or refusal to consent to any of the terms and conditions of the RFP, imposition of additional conditions, or any material omission may constitute a deficiency which may render the offer unacceptable. An offeror’s failure or refusal to meet the requirements for “Relevant Organizational Experience” or “Extent of Participation of Small Business” may constitute a deficiency which may render the offer unacceptable. If an offer is determined unacceptable, the proposal will not be further evaluated. The Government reserves the right to enter discussions at any time during the evaluation. However, if at any point in the evaluation the “Minimum Gate” requirement is determined to be “not met” (to include discussions as prescribed in Provision L-317(b)(3)(C)), offerors will be notified timely, and the proposal will be removed from further consideration; no further evaluation will be performed. Any proposal determined to have an unmitigated organizational conflict of interest (OCI) pertaining to the prime or any of the proposed subcontractors may be removed from further consideration for award at any point during the evaluation.

(2) MINIMUM GATE REQUIREMENT: RELEVANT ORGANIZATIONAL EXPERIENCE

This acceptability criteria is an evaluation of the offeror’s organizational experience relevant to the kinds of challenges in size and scope under the contract contemplated by this RFP. This evaluation will consider whether the offeror’s proposal meets the minimum requirements for relevant organizational experience listed below. “Offerors” are considered to be inclusive of the prime and all subcontractors that are submitted in the “offer” or proposal.

Offerors must meet all of the following minimum requirements in order to be determined acceptable:

(i) Offerors shall demonstrate relevant organizational experience in performing on-site work in all three of the below key SOW areas. The key SOW areas are listed in descending order based on the anticipated amount of work to be performed under the prospective contract:

(A) Experience in SOW Para 3.4 (inclusive of all subparagraphs)

(B) Experience in SOW Para 3.3 (inclusive of all subparagraphs)

(C) Experience in SOW Para 3.5 (inclusive of all subparagraphs)

Program Office Support Services experience for the work under the key areas of the SOW will not be considered acceptable, and will not count towards the cumulative value of installation experience.

(ii) Offerors shall demonstrate relevant organizational experience in the form of shore C4ISR or other like shore electronic systems installation experience

(iii) Offerors’ provided relevant organizational experience must take place after January 30, 2012.

(iv) Offerors shall demonstrate a current cumulative value of prime and subcontractor relevant organizational experience for shore installation work that is equal to or exceeds the following:

(A) $95 million of shore installation work

Subcontractors may be used for the purposes of meeting the relevant organizational experience thresholds specified above only where the offeror proposes a subcontractor for this contract at a value equal to or greater than the referenced relevant organizational experience value for that same subcontractor in Attachment 6 and the proposed cover sheet(s) of the letters of commitment.

(3) MINIMUM GATE REQUIREMENT: EXTENT OF PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

(i) This acceptability criteria is an evaluation of the proposed participation of small business concerns

(whether as a prime or subcontractor) in terms of the total acquisition value. For purposes of acceptability, the extent of participation of small business shall be at least ten (10) percent of the total acquisition value. Of the proposed ten (10) percent, at least five (5) percent of the total acquisition value shall be attributable to direct labor hours. Acceptability of an offer will be evaluated by reviewing information provided under RFP Attachment 8 and the proposed cover sheet(s) of the letters of commitment. ALL prime contractors (both large and small business) are required to complete RFP Attachment 8.

(ii) It should be noted that Evaluation Factor 3 as detailed below is a separate review of the Extent of

Participation of Small Business. This acceptability requirement is a minimum requirement for further consideration of the proposal. The completed RFP Attachment 8 submittal will be used to evaluate both this acceptability determination and Evaluation Factor 3.

(iii) If at any time prior to award the proposed ceiling distribution amounts or a proposed subcontractor ceiling distribution amount is determined to be calculated incorrectly, such that an offeror is determined to have not met the Minimum Gate requirement for Extent of Participation of Small Business, the offer may be excluded from further consideration. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the offeror to ensure calculations for meeting the Minimum Gate requirement are correct prior to submitting the offer. For the purposes of acceptability, it is incumbent upon the offeror to validate each subcontractor’s small business size determination and identify the

NAICS code for which the subcontractor is identifying as a small business.

(iv) The proposal for this acceptability criteria will be evaluated for consistency with the proposed

Small Business Subcontracting Plan (for large businesses only). A conflict or disparity in the amount of total dollars subcontracted between the proposal for this acceptability criteria and the proposed Small Business

Subcontracting Plan may result in exclusion from further consideration for award.

(d) The evaluation factors listed below are in descending order of importance.

Factor 1: Technical and Management Capability

Factor 2: Organizational Past Performance

Factor 3: Extent of Participation of Small Business

Factor (1) is significantly more important than Factor (2). Factor (2) is more important than Factor (3).

Under each evaluation factor, specified individual evaluation sub-factors are weighted equally.

(1) FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY

This evaluation factor involves a written submission and an oral presentation. For this factor, all of the questions for both the written and oral portions are equally weighted subfactors. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror demonstrates the breadth and depth of its technical and management capability relative to its Key

Personnel, staffing, tasking, processing, executing, reporting and managing consolidated task orders for shore-based installations of C4ISR or other like shore electronic systems installations. The Government will also evaluate the offeror’s relevant experience, qualifications, and knowledge with regard to the requirements of the Statement of

Work. Ratings will be provided in accordance with Attachment 11, Proposal Ratings Guide.

(2) FACTOR 2: ORGANIZATIONAL PAST PERFORMANCE

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past performance information submitted, or otherwise obtained, in accordance with Provision L-325. The Government will evaluate the Reference Information Sheet/performance data provided by offerors for work performed after January 30, 2012. The Government reserves the right to use past performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the offeror. The past performance evaluation will result in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation will consider each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the requirements of this solicitation. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance. The second is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through this source selection. The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance. This quality assessment will be made on the basis of CPARS or Past Performance Questionnaires

(PPQs) submitted with the proposal, though in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2), the Government may consider past performance information from any other appropriate source, such as the Past Performance Information

Retrieval System (PPIRS) or customer questionnaires. In accordance with Attachment 11, each experience considered will receive a performance confidence assessment rating based on the evaluated recency, relevancy and quality. At the factor level, one performance confidence assessment rating will be assigned for each offeror based on the aggregate of the individual experience performance confidence assessment ratings. If the offeror’s past performance information is unavailable or the offeror has no record of relevant Past Performance, the offeror’s past performance is unknown and will be assigned a performance confidence rating of “neutral.”

(3) FACTOR 3: EXTENT OF PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

This factor will assess the extent to which offerors commit to small business performance (whether as a prime or subcontractor) in terms of the total acquisition value. For this FACTOR only, small businesses identifying as more than one socioeconomic category may be counted to meet more than one of the minimum proposed percentages for socioeconomic purposes. Offerors shall not be permitted to use small businesses more than once for the Extent of

Participation of Small Business “Minimum Gate Requirement”.

Information provided under RFP Attachment 8 will be evaluated in accordance with Attachment 11. ALL prime contractors (both large and small business) are required to complete RFP Attachment 8.

(e) Evaluation of an offeror’s proposal shall be based on the information presented in the proposal and information available to the contracting office from sources deemed appropriate. Sources typically considered include the

Defense Contract Audit Agency, Defense Contract Management Agency offices, other contracts with same firms for similar items or services, and known commercial sources. Proposals which are unrealistic in terms of technical or schedule commitments, may be deemed to be reflective of an inherent lack of technical competence or indicative of a failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the proposed work, which may be grounds for rejection of the proposal. If the proposed contract requires the delivery of data, the quality of organization and writing reflected in the proposal will be considered to be an indication of the quality of organization and writing which would be prevalent in the proposed deliverable data. Subjective judgment on the part of the Government evaluators is implicit in the entire process.

(End of provision)

(End of Alternate I)

(End of Summary of Changes)