PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc

DOC document 657 KB Posted

Attached to
SRDRS Support Vessel (Pacific)
Solicitation number
N00033-14-R-2006
Issued by

About this file

Attachment B

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SRDRS_14R2006_Amend_0003.pdf PDF
14R2006_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Questions_1_through_2.pdf PDF
14-R-2006_Amend_0001.pdf PDF
PAST_PERFORMANCE_DATA_SHEET.doc DOC document
SRDRS_PACIFIC_RFP.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment B

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO:

FACSIMILE:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION to Taylor Reeves. Information can also be sent via facsimile to the attention of Taylor Reeves at 202-685-5225. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you, C. Taylor Reeves

Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Taylor Reeves

Military Sealift Command

914 Charles Morris Ct.

Bldg 157, Room 215

Washington Navy Yard, D.C. 20398

From:

(Name and Address of Organization)

(Point of Contact Name)

(Facsimile/Phone Number)

(E-mail Address)

To (Point of Contact Name)

Taylor Reeves (Facsimile Number)

202-685-5922 (E-mail Address) charles.t.reeves1@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD:

DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1.

Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

MSC V1.1 (23 July 2013)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .