USS ROSS_QA 5.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 38 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0002422R4422
About this file
This document provides bidder questions and answers related to solicitation N00024-22-R-4422 for the USS ROSS (DDG 71) Extended Dry-Docking Selected Restricted Availability (EDSRA). The Naval Sea Systems Command seeks to award a single contract for maintenance, modernization, and repair work on the USS ROSS, with an estimated period of performance from July 2022 through November 2023. Key details include that the availability will take place on the East Coast of the United States over approximately 16 months. Interested offerors must register in SAM.gov and PIEE to receive solicitation documents and submit proposals electronically. The document addresses bidder questions on technical specifications, references, pricing terms and contract provisions. The Navy anticipates making award by July 2022.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N00024-22-R-4422-0009 Conformed.pdf | ||
| USS ROSS_QA 8.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N00024-22-R-4422-0009.pdf | ||
| N00024-22-R-4422-0008.pdf | ||
| USS ROSS_QA 7.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N00024-22-R-4422-0008 Conformed.pdf | ||
| N00024-22-R-4422-0007 Conformed.pdf | ||
| N00024-22-R-4422-0007.pdf | ||
| USS ROSS_QA 6.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N00024-22-R-4422-0006.pdf | ||
| N00024-22-R-4422-0006 CONFORMED.pdf | ||
| N00024-22-R-4422-0005.pdf | ||
| N00024-22-R-4422-0005 CONFORMED.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PPI FORM
| USS ROSS (DDG 71) FY23 EDSRA N00024-22-R-4422 |
| Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form |
| MASTER TRACKER |
| Master # | Contractor | Question # | Date of Request: | Section | Work Items/CSWT # | Para. # | Page #: | Attach. # | Contractor Question | Government Response | |
| 15 | 2/1/22 | Soliciation | Solicitation includes an estimated award date of “in or before 29 July 2022” on page 172 of 188. | ||||||||
| Please confirm that USS ROSS will be awarded well in advance of the start date and closer to the goal of A-120. | Per Amendment 0002 the Start of Availability date is 07 Nov 2022. | ||||||||||
| 23 | 2/2/22 | 980-00-002 | 3.6 | Para 3.6 requires transportation services to and from LOGREP. Please provide an address for this location. | The PHD Logistics Representative (LOG REP) will deliver the 4 pallets near the staging area for the successful offeror's fork lift offload and then the successful offeror will crane onto the ship, with reverse actions for the 4 pallets of offloaded material from the ship by the successful offeror to be reloaded on a flatbed truck with the successful offeror's forklift. | ||||||
| 25 | 2/2/22 | 992-11-002 | ALL | The requirements of this item are already covered in para 3.3 of 992-11-008. Recommend deleting this item. | 992-11-002 was deleted as recommended errata 3. | ||||||
| 39 | 2/1/22 | RFP | The estimated date of award is listed a July 29, 2022 but the start date of the work is July 25, 2022. Please provide correct estimated date of award. | Per Amendment 0002 the Start of Availability date is 07 Nov 2022. | |||||||
| 40 | 2/7/22 | RFP | Section I, FAR 52.217-7, page 157 of 188 | In the table defining the Latest Option Exercise Dates, some CLINs are listed twice (ex. 0006, 0009-0013, etc.) and others are not identified at all (ex. 0040, 0043, etc.). Please clarify and update. | Revised per Amendment 0005. | ||||||
| 111 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Please confirm the cognizant RMC that will perform as ACO for this solicitation should it become a contract. | This is a coast wide solicitation the cognizant RMC will be identified upon award. | ||||||
| 112 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Please provide the release language that will be issued for each bilateral modification to the contemplated contract post award. | Bilateral modifications will be executed post-award on a case-by-case basis using release language satisfactory to the contracting officer. | ||||||
| 113 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Please confirm the RMC selected as ACO assisted in drafting this soliciation and responses to the questions and answers. | This is a coast wide solicitation the cognizant RMC will be identified upon award. | ||||||
| 114 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference page 67, |
"NOTE A: LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION –SHIP REPAIR
5. If, in the opinion of the Contractor, any effort directed in the Growth Management Request Form (GMR) calls for effort outside the scope of the contract, the Contractor shall notify the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) in writing within two (2) working days after the receipt of any such direction. In the event of a cost dispute, the ACO may unilaterally authorize hours and material against LOE work. The Contractor shall not proceed with the work directed by the GMR unless and until the Contractor is notified by the ACO to proceed with the directed work. The Contractor is required to proceed with the directed work as directed by the ACO. Thereafter, any remaining disagreement shall be addressed in accordance with FAR 52.233-1(Alt. 1) ‘Disputes.’ Additionally, if the cost of performing the disputed direction exceeds $100,000, the Contractor is required to comply with FAR 52.243-6 ‘Change Order Accounting.’"
| The above appears to be the first reference to GMR and there is no declaraitve statement that a GMR is required for all efforts. Please state when a GMR is required. | The Growth Management Request Form (GMR) is appropriate for growth work identified by the Contracting Officer as within scope. | ||||
| 115 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference page 73, |
"NOTE E: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS
3. The Contractor shall report proposed growth work through the normal CFR process and submit a Class F estimate as part of its CFR submission. If the Contracting Officer determines the proposed work is within-scope growth and accepts the CFR as written, all estimates $17,500, or less, will be authorized through bilateral execution of GMR. In the event the scope is disputed or the Class F estimate submitted is greater than $17,500, the ACO, with coordination from the Project Manager, shall use best efforts to determine if the proposed growth is $25,000 or less, and document the agreed to technical scope of work. The Government may also independently identify growth work. The Contracting Officer shall direct commencement of all growth work. Directed growth will be followed by documentation to appropriately reflect specification changes."
Please define Class F as the reference does not appear in the Form 33.
Please identify how the number $17,500 was arrived at inclusive of all historical references and the specific distinctions between SDVG and GMR usage.
| Please provide the contractual authority allowing bilateral execution of a GMR vs contract modification. | See Revised Note E | ||||
| 116 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Please confirm the following text from refernce page 69, Section B para. 6 will be included in its entirety without edit to the resulting awarded contract. |
6. For growth and new work contract changes involving subcontractors, subcontractor quotes will be treated as Other Direct Costs (ODCs) and will be subject to the contract material burden rate shown in paragraph (7) below. Subcontractor quotes must be competitively acquired and submitted with the contractor’s COPA in response to RCCs, GMRs and RTRs issued by the Contracting Officer. At no time will the proposed total to be performed by the prime contractor combined with subcontractor quote, material quote, and applicable burdens be allowed to cost more than it would have, had the prime contractor directly provided all material and labor. The proposed total pricing restriction addressed in the preceding sentence does not apply in any case where the work is required to be performed by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Government directed subcontractors, and/or Government authorized vendors. RCCs and RTRs that are subcontracted for material only (no associated labor required within the RCC) shall not be subject to the Material Burden Rate. Any material burden rate applied to new work shall be approved by the ACO, upon receipt of supporting documentation in accordance with FAR 15.404-3, Subcontract Pricing Considerations.
| The Government intends for offerors to propose in accordance with the solicitation as written in accordance with the latest amendment issued. The Government reserves the right to amend the solicitation as appropriate. | ||||||
| 117 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Does the contracting officer as of the date of the response to this question have a reasonable expectation, based on market research or other assessment, that two or more responsible offerors, competing independently, will submit priced offers in response to the solicitation 's expressed requirement. | The Government cannot provide this information, this information is Source Selection Sensitive. | |
| 119 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference page 70, Section B, Para. 9. "9. In the event of an extension due to excusable delay to the delivery date for the USS ROSS (DDG 71) FY22 EDSRA, the Contractor’s fully burdened ship repair labor rate shall be escalated by 0.29 % commencing 3 months after the Attachment J-3 “Contract Complete” date. Following the “Contract Complete” date identified in Attachment J-3 (Milestones), this rate shall be escalated quarterly through the 24th month, if necessary, and shall be used to negotiate all growth and new work. Note, in the event of an excusable delay, this escalation rate shall be applied only to growth and new work not previously identified in Attachment J-4 (Pricing Worksheet). The material burden rate shall not increase. | ||
| Please clearly state that accepting the referenced clause in its current form is a condition of award or is not a condition of award. If yes, please provide reasoning inclusive of FAR references supporting position. | Yes, acceptance of the clause in entirety is a condition of award. | |||||
| 120 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference page 70, "NOTE C: Option item to which the option clause FAR 52.217-7 (NAVSEA Variation II) applies and which is to be supplied only if and to the extent said option is exercised. |
52.217-7 (NAVSEA Variation II)."
| Please explain specifically which option item is being refered to here. | Note C refers to all option items. | ||||
| 122 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference, page 72, |
"NOTE E: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS
2. The amount included in this Contract for the growth described above shall be equal to a maximum quantity of:
a. 450 occurrences for growth work computed at a firm fixed price of $6,986 per occurrence, as associated with CLINS 0040 – 0083 for the USS ROSS (DDG 71) FY22 (EDSRA).
Please identify the reasoning inclusive of sources that the contracting officer has identified 450 occurences for this avail.
Please identify the computations inclusive of source material, historical references, and avails that the government has reviwed to identify $6,986 as a reasonable FFP for both the Contractor and the Government.
| This is based on historical data, however, the historical data cannot be provided, as it is proprietary/business sensitive. | ||||
| 125 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference page 73-74, |
"NOTE F: AVAILABILITY SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE
3. The growth work described above, if required, shall be tasked during the contract period of performance, as may be modified, on the following schedule phasing:
• No more than 50% of the hours or material following the 50% schedule point of the availability (as measured in days between the “Availability Start” and “Contract Complete” milestones in Attachment J-3), adjusted for delay to delivery date.
• No more than 25% of the hours or material following the 75% schedule point of the availability (as measured in days between the “Availability Start” and “Contract Complete” milestones in Attachment J-3), adjusted for delay to delivery date.
| Please confirm that for purposes of calculating the above percentages under the resultant award that the Availability Start and Contract Complete milestone dates will remain fixed dates as proposed in the Attachment J-3 at the time of the award. | As cited in Note F, the date may be adjusted for delay as determined by the Contracting Officer. | ||||
| 126 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference page 80, |
"Section C - Descriptions and Specifications SCOPE OF WORK 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, "1.12.2 GOVERNMENT REVIEW AND RESPONSE TO CFR: The Maintenance Team will review the CFR. If the CFR is inadequate or incomplete, it will be rejected with time continuing to accrue (relative to five (5) working day requirement). As appropriate, the Government and contractor will need to meet, conduct ship checks and/or discuss the recommendation for corrective action further to determine the full scope of work required prior to final approval of the CFR. Accuracy of CFR submissions may be evaluated in CPARS and utilized for past performance ratings on future requirements. Additionally, deductions may be assessed in accordance with Attachment J-5, QASP."
Please confirm the authority for determining if a CFR is inadeuate or incomplete.
Please confirm the required number of calendar or business days the government has to determine if a CFR is inadequate or incomplete.
| The Government has the authority to determine if a CFR is inadequate or incomplete. The Government will respond within a reasonable time. | ||||
| 127 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Refernce page 82, |
"4. COST, SCHEDULE AND FINANCIAL DATA
1. USS ROSS (DDG 71) FY22 EDSRA must be delivered, mission-ready, no later than the “Contract Complete – Mission Ready Vessel Delivered to Fleet” (“Contract Complete”) date included in Attachment J-3."
Please confirm the government does not mean to imply that the contractor is required to meet Mission Ready requirements in addition to the items, materials, and services identified in the proposed contract between the parties.
| Performance of the SOW and specification package, in accordance with contract requirements, is expected to result in the contractor delivering a mission ready ship. | |||||
| 128 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference Paragraph 6.9 of the Solicitation STANDARD FORM 33 pg 87 of the Scope states that C-217-H005 does not apply to CLINs: 0040 – 0083. Please explain why the government does not believe this clause applies to the referenced CLINs that include growth CLINS. Please confirm that now other growth CLIN(s) will be added to the contract post award. | The LOE2C CLINs are considered part of the scope of the contract. Any additional growth and all new work will be subject to negotiation prior to being added to the contract |
| 129 | 2/17/22 | RFP | Solicitation | Reference page 67, |
"NOTE A: LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION –SHIP REPAIR
1. The Contractor agrees to provide the level of effort to completion (LOE to Completion) in the performance of growth CLINs in the execution of the USS ROSS (DDG 71) EDSRA:
a. 101,981 direct labor hours (labor hours) and $3,925,923 ($TBD fully burdened) materials to complete expected, within scope growth work on the USS ROSS (DDG 71) EDSRA work package under CLINS 0040 – 0083."
Please confirm the government the government at time of this solicitation has secured all funding necessary to complete the vessel.
Please confirm the government will fully fund all contractual milestones and the 101,981 labor hours and the $2,925,923 at the time of award.
| Option CLINs are identified as such in the solicitation. | ||||||
| 134 | 2/21/22 | Solicitation | With the issuance of Amendment 2 and the availability moving to the right by 4 months, the Contractor asks the Government to extend the bid date to April 22nd. Our Subcontractors and vendors have been working towards the old availability dates and need time to adjust. This extension is also required since we have been missing several drawings for 456-90-001 and the 4720 for all the Shipalts. The Government just responded to the Contractors to request the missing references through a DoD Safe. | Per Amendment 0005, the proposal due date has been extended to 12 April 2022. | ||
| 135 | 2/21/22 | 514-23-001 | 3.9 | Paragraph 3.9 calls out 009-09 for cleaning the refrigeration piping. Is the piping to be cleaned just the repaired piping on the PPO suction line or is the intent to clean the entire #3 A/C plant? | Please price the work item as written: 3.9 Accomplish the requirements of 009-09 of 2.1 for the process control procedure to flush and clean the refrigerant piping system. | |
| 136 | 2/21/22 | Attachment J-1 | 551-50-001 | 3.3.1, 3.3.1.1 | The Contractor received a quote from the Manufacturer here in Norfolk. His quote to us is priced to accomplish all work here in the Norfolk area, and not in Benicia, Ca. as indicated in 3.3.1.1. | For Work Item 551-50-001, the address was given of the OEM in para 3.3.1.1 as the address of the Manufacture. The overhaul doesn’t have to be done in California provided the requirements of para 3.5 are met. This work has to be accomplished IAW paragraph 3.5. |
| 137 | 2/21/22 | Attachment J-1 | 551-50-001 | 3.9 | The Manufacturer of the compressor has indicated on his quote that the Test Memo listed in para 2.7 is outdated and they recommend that an optest be accomplished IAW a more updated test memo that applies to DDG 64-78 and approved by MARMC. | The Government removed 2.7 as a reference and added S9550-bz-trs-010 and s9550-bz-trs-020 as a reference via Errata 5. Paragraph 3.9 has been edited to read; Accomplish testing IAW ref (S9550-bz-trs-010) Para 8-3.2 and 8-3.3. Perform 4 hour loaded test. Maintain pressure for entire 4 hours. References S9550-bz-trs-010 and s9550-bz-trs-020 are restricted and can be requested from the technical library. |
| 138 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference N00024-22-R-4422-0001, page 2 of 9 |
"NOTE E: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS
1. To make administration of small dollar value growth more efficient and less costly, both parties (Government and Contractor) agree to a pre-priced value for individual growth items with an estimated price of $25,000 or less. The Contract will include a firm fixed price for growth valued at $25,000.00 or less. Zero-dollar changes and administrative contract changes (for example, drawing revision change where no additional work is required) shall not be executed using the Small Dollar Value Growth procedures, but will follow the change process.
2. The amount included in this Contract for the growth described above shall be equal to a maximum quantity of:
a. 450 occurrences for growth work computed at a firm fixed price of $6,986 per occurrence, as associated with CLINS 0040 – 0083 for the USS ROSS (DDG 71) FY22 (EDSRA)."
| Please identify if the Government's intent to have the successful offeror receive less than its costs on 1 or more Small Dollar Value Growth items under this clause by preventing the offerror from receiving profit in excess of its cost for a SDVG occurrence that costs the offeror more than $6,986. | Please see updated Note E language. | |||
| 139 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference N00024-22-R-4422-0001, page 2 of 9 |
"NOTE E: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS
1. To make administration of small dollar value growth more efficient and less costly, both parties (Government and Contractor) agree to a pre-priced value for individual growth items with an estimated price of $25,000 or less. The Contract will include a firm fixed price for growth valued at $25,000.00 or less. Zero-dollar changes and administrative contract changes (for example, drawing revision change where no additional work is required) shall not be executed using the Small Dollar Value Growth procedures, but will follow the change process.
2. The amount included in this Contract for the growth described above shall be equal to a maximum quantity of:
a. 450 occurrences for growth work computed at a firm fixed price of $6,986 per occurrence, as associated with CLINS 0040 – 0083 for the USS ROSS (DDG 71) FY22 (EDSRA)."
| Please confirm acceptance of the referenced Note E in its entirety is a condition of award by answering Yes or No to this question. If the Government is unable to answer Yes or No, Offer will understand the Government is implying that acceptance to the referenced clause in its entirety is a condition of award. | Yes - In accordance with Section L.C.1. Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award. | |||
| 140 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference N00024-22-R-4422-0001, page 2 of 9 |
"NOTE E: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS
1. To make administration of small dollar value growth more efficient and less costly, both parties (Government and Contractor) agree to a pre-priced value for individual growth items with an estimated price of $25,000 or less. The Contract will include a firm fixed price for growth valued at $25,000.00 or less. Zero-dollar changes and administrative contract changes (for example, drawing revision change where no additional work is required) shall not be executed using the Small Dollar Value Growth procedures, but will follow the change process.
2. The amount included in this Contract for the growth described above shall be equal to a maximum quantity of:
a. 450 occurrences for growth work computed at a firm fixed price of $6,986 per occurrence, as associated with CLINS 0040 – 0083 for the USS ROSS (DDG 71) FY22 (EDSRA)."
Please provide all calculations utilized to derive the price of $6,986 and justifications under the FAR or DFAR that the government has used to determine the price is fair and reasonable for the Offerror.
| Please provide the Government's justification under the FAR that requires a contractor waive its right to receiving profit for a SDVG item under a Firm Fixed Price CLIN on a Firm Fixed Price LOE contract. | This is based on historical data, however, the historical data cannot be provided, as it is proprietary/business sensitive. | |||
| 141 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference N00024-22-R-4422-0001, page 2 of 9 |
"NOTE E: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS
4. The Contractor shall report proposed growth work through the normal CFR process in accordance with Contract terms. The Government may also independently identify growth work. No later than 24 hours after the final approval of the CFR, the Waterfront Circuit Team shall use best efforts to determine if the proposed growth is $25,000 or less, and document the agreed to technical scope of work. The Contracting Officer shall direct the commencement of all growth work. Directed growth will be followed by documentation to appropriately reflect specification changes."
Please provide the specific time requirement identifying the amount of time the government has to review the CFR and determine Final Approval and what happens contractually if that time requirement is not met.
| Contractor does not see NMD currently has a status of Final Approval. Please confirm the cognizant government personnel will be required to record a status of Final Approval in NMD. Recommend utilizing the status of "answered" to start the "No later than 24 hours" requirement, if the government is unable to confirm the status of Final Approval is already in NMD for CFRs. | The Government will review within a reasonable time as determined by the Government. | |||
| 144 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference Page 67 of 189. |
2. The total LOE to Completion for the performance of the above growth CLINs shall be comprised of labor hours and the associated material required to support the expected, within scope growth. The mix of labor hours and material may be adjusted. Adjustments to the labor hour and material mix will be documented via weekly Technical Direction Letter (TDL) and subsequently unilaterally adjusted via contract modification. The Government reserves the right to reconcile the weekly TDLs via unilateral modification at the Administrative Contracting Officer’s (ACO) discretion.
Please confirm the Technical Direction Letter is required to be mutually agreed to by the parties.
Please identify the timeframe the government is required to include the adjustments via contract modification after the TDL.
Please confirm the government does not intend for the TDLs to replacing fully funded contract modifications. Non-concur, TDLs are not required to be mutually agreed to by the parties.
The Government reserves the right to reconcile the weekly TDLs via unilateral modification at the Administrative Contracting Officer’s (ACO) discretion.
The LOE2C CLINs are fully funded either at contract award or at option exercise 145 2/22/22 Solicitation Reference Page 67 of 189
3. LOE to completion obligations specified above shall only include effort performed in direct support of this contract and shall not include time and effort expended on such things as (local travel to and from an employee's usual work location), uncompensated effort while on travel status, truncated lunch periods, work (actual or inferred) at an employee's residence or other non-work locations.
| Please confirm this clauses recognizes the government is required to order growth work under the limits identified in NOTE A: LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION –SHIP REPAIR, 1. | The Government does not understand this question as written, please clarify or restate this question. | |||
| 147 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference Page 67 of 189 |
6. The labor hours and material requirements listed in Section B, Note A, paragraph 1 above are part of this contract. Prime contractor efforts shall be deducted from the labor hours allocated. Subcontractor efforts and materials shall be deducted from the materials allocated. The balance of labor hours and materials remaining in the LOE to Completion CLINs will be recouped by the Government via final contract modification at the end of the availability.
Please confirm that the Reference to Note A in this clause refers to the limits in Note A, 1. to avoid a potential conflict in the contract.
| Please confirm that the statement "Prime contractor efforts shall be deducted from the labor hours allocated. Subcontractor efforts and, materials shall be deducted from the materials allocated." means the government will deduct labor hours and materials from the contractual limits identified in NOTE A: LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION –SHIP REPAIR, 1. and issue a bilateral modification should the order limits be exceeded by the government. | The Government does not understand this question as written, please clarify or restate this question. | |||
| 148 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference Page 67 of 189 |
7. Only authorized direct production labor hours shall be deducted from the LOE to Completion direct labor hour ceiling set forth in Section B, Note A, paragraph 1 above. Per Note B paragraph 2 below, all non-production labor shall be included in the Contractor’s fully burdened labor rate. Non-production hours shall not be included in pricing submitted in support of growth issued under the LOE to Completion CLINs. Additionally, Contractor LOE to Completion pricing shall not include any allowance for technical representatives or for any other Government directed source unless specifically directed by the Contracting Officer.
| Please confirm that the government is referring to limits as identified in NOTE A: LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION –SHIP REPAIR, 1. | The Government does not understand this question as written, please clarify or restate this question. | |||
| 149 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | 8. Only authorized material dollars shall be deducted from LOE to Completion material reservation set forth in |
Reference Page 68 of 189
Section B, Note A, paragraph 1 above. This material reservation consists of the total cost of materials and subcontractor efforts proposed. All subcontractor quotes shall be included in the Change Order Price Analysis (COPA) as per Section C, paragraph 1.13. Material dollars may include freight or duties if specifically itemized on the invoice for the material. The Contractor shall not be allowed to add material handling charges, overhead (including G&A), or profit into the settled cost of materials deducted from the material reservation.
| Please confirm the government means that the material $ limits identified in NOTE A: LEVEL OF EFFORT TO COMPLETION –SHIP REPAIR, 1. are not also being referred to as "material reservation" to avoid potentially conflicting language in the solicitation and potentially conflicting language in the resulting award. | Section B Note A refers to LOETC CLINs only. | |||
| 150 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference Page 68 of 189 |
9. The information received in the consolidated final report required by Section C paragraph 6.6 will be used by the ACO in the issuance of one contract modification based on the information received in the final report identified in Section C below, which will be a final settlement for all LOE to Completion labor hours and material dollars. Once the number of labor hours and materials for directed work has been settled, neither party shall be entitled to an adjustment because the expended labor hours and materials differ from the settled price. This shall not preclude an adjustment otherwise permitted by law and regulation; e.g. fraud, product substitution, defective workmanship or materials. Each directed work shall receive approval by the SUPERVISOR and the ACO. (“SUPERVISOR” as defined in NAVSEA Standard Item (NSI) 009-01, paragraph 4.3, refers to the local Government activity responsible for the execution and contract administration of Navy maintenance and modernization work.)
Please provide the reason behind adding the following language, "Once the number of labor hours and materials for directed work has been settled, neither party shall be entitled to an adjustment because the expended labor hours and materials differ from the settled price. This shall not preclude an adjustment otherwise permitted by law and regulation; e.g. fraud, product substitution, defective workmanship or materials." and the definition of "settled" being used.
| Does settled in this context mean after contractual bi-lateral modification or is there a different definition of settled being used here. If yes please provide the definition of settled being utilized. | Hours and material negotiated and bilaterally agreed upon under LOETC are considered settled. Any bilateral agreement reached for LOETC hours and material is considered settlement. The Contracting Officer may unilaterally direct hours and material if necessary to support execution as referenced in Note A, paragraph 5. Unilateral direction from the Contracting Officer is also considered settlement. If the contractor disagrees, the disagreement shall be addressed in accordance with FAR 52.233-1(Alt. 1) ‘Disputes.’ | ||||
| 151 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Please provide the definition of the term settled and include it as a defined term in the solicitation. | See previous response | |
| 153 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference Page 70 |
7. The contract fixed fully burdened ship repair labor rate and material burden rate are shown below. These fixed rates shall be used for negotiating growth and new work during the availability and up to three (3) months after the Attachment J-3 ‘Contract Complete’ date:
Please confirm that there is no FAR or DFAR mandated limit on the price for the fully burdened ship repair labor rate.
Please confirm that there is no FAR or DFAR mandated limit on the material burder rate%
Please confirm acceptance of the referenced clause in its entirety is a condition of award by answering Yes or No to this question. If the Government is unable to answer Yes or No, Offer will understand the Government is implying that acceptance to the referenced clause in its entirety is a condition of award. Per FAR 15.404-1(a)(1), the Contracting Officer has to determine the fully burdened ship repair labor rate and the material burder rate% are fair and reasonable.
Acceptance of a clause in its entirety is a condition of award.
154 2/22/22 Solicitation Reference Page 175 of 189 C. Alteration of Solicitation
1. Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.
Please confirm if the Offeror takes an exception to a clause in its entirety or part of a clause in Offeror's cover letter and does not alter a solicitation document the offeror will be excluded from award.
| Yes, acceptance of the clauses in entirety is a condition of award. | |||
| 155 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference Government Response: |
"In accordance with Section L. III.C, Alteration of Solicitation, “1. Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.” An offeror is required to accept what is stated in the solicitation and sign the SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged."
Please confirm an Offeror is or is not require to accept a clause in its entiriety as a condition of award.
If the Government is unable to answer Yes or No, Offer will understand the Government is implying that acceptance to the referenced clause in its entirety is a condition of award.
| Yes offeror is required to accept a clause in its entirety as a condition of award. | |||
| 156 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Reference J4 (USS ROSS) Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook |
Does the government agree that New Work is not part of the anticipated award of the base contract?
Please provide the reasoning behind the government's statement "Proposed New Work (For Evaluation Purposes only)".
| Government requests clarification of contractor's intent for this question | |||
| 157 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Refernce Page 72 |
NOTE E
NOTE E: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS
1. To make administration of small dollar value growth more efficient and less costly, both parties (Government and Contractor) agree to a pre-priced value for individual growth items with an estimated price of $25,000 or less. The Contract will include a firm fixed price for growth valued at $25,000.00 or less. Zero-dollar changes and administrative contract changes (for example, drawing revision change where no additional work is required) shall not be executed using the Small Dollar Value Growth procedures, but will follow the change process.
| Please identify the estimated cost savings to both Government and Contractor individually as implied by the statement "To make administration of small dollar value growth more efficient and less costly, both parties (Government and Contractor) agree to a pre-priced value for individual growth items with an estimated price of $25,000 or less." | The purpose of SDVG is to facilitate efficient execution of growth under $25,000. | ||||||
| 162 | 2/22/22 | Solicitation | Rquesting a one week extension to the ship check cut-off date. This would require extension to 3/5/22. | Per Amendment 0004, the ship check has been extended to 18 March 2022. | |||
| 164 | 2/24/22 | Attachment J-2 | 456-90-001 | This Package came out for bid on January 28th. After a month and several requests made for the missing references on 456-90-001, the contractor still has not received the missing references. Without this information, the contractor cannot price this item. | Missing reference(s) will be available upon request from SEA 02. Requests for missing reference(s) shall be directed to Mike Hammersley, Contracting Officer and Danielle Bences, Contract Specialist at james.m.hammersley.civ@us.navy.mil and danielle.m.bences.civ@us.navy.mil | ||
| 165 | 2/24/22 | Attachment J-2 | 4720's | This Package came out for bid on January 28th. After a month and several requests made for the 4720 for all the kitted material for the many shipalts in the package, the contractor still has not received this vital information. The contractor has no idea what the kitted material consists of. Without this document, the contractor cannot provide the Government with accurate pricing. The Contractor again requests an extension be granted until April 29th. | Per Amendment 0005, the proposal due date has been extended to 12 April 2022. | ||
| 168 | 2/28/22 | RFP | Solicitation | The Small Dollar Value Growth (SDVG) on the USS ROSS EDSRA is $6,986 per change (450 @ $6,986 for total of $3,143,700). Recent avails have had the SDVG at $7,397 (DONALD COOK DSRA 307 @ $7,397), $8,063 (PINCKNEY DMP 451 @ $8,063), $8,174 (COLE ISRA 46 @ $8,174). What is the SDVG difference between these availabilities? Can the equation used be provided to Industry? | SDVG Values are based upon historical data. Calculations, historical information, and detailed references used cannot be shared outside of the Government as this information is business sensitive. | ||
| 170 | 3/1/22 | 311-33-001 Errata 2 | 2.2 - 2.9 | Please provide the following references that were added to the work item via Amendment 3, Errata 2: 2.2, S9311-C6-MMO-A30/Volume 3, Rev 3, Ship Service Gas Turbine Generator SSGTG Model AG9140 with FADC LOCOP Controls |
2.3, S9311-C6-MMO-A40/Volume 4, Rev 4, Ship Service Gas Turbine Generator SSGTG Model AG9140 with FADC LOCOP Controls 2.4, S9311-C6-MMO-A50/Volume 5, Rev 2, AG9140 Ship Service Gas Turbine Generator (SSGTG) with FADC LOCOP Controls 2.5, 259-6595726 Rev W, Fab & Instl of SS Gtrb Uptake & Air Intakes Generator Rm & Abv 2.6, 23059006 Exhaust System Assembly 2.7, 23036069 Rev D, Expansion Joint 2.8, 23036070 Rev B, Gasket, Exhaust 2.9, 259-7401967 Rev B, ShipAlt DDG-51-TY64, 215 Gas Turbine Uptake Bolting Flg Mod & Ml
| Missing reference(s) will be available upon request from SEA 02. Requests for missing reference(s) shall be directed to Mike Hammersley, Contracting Officer and Danielle Bences, Contract Specialist at james.m.hammersley.civ@us.navy.mil and danielle.m.bences.civ@us.navy.mil | |||||
| 177 | 3/1/22 | 466-11-001 Errata 2 | 2.7 | Please provide the following references that were added to the work item via Amendment 3, Errata 2: 2.6, 450-6595776 Rev K, Fab of Elek Arr and Det Radar RF XMSN Lines AN/SPY-ID (AN/SPS-64) and AN/SPS-67 | Missing reference(s) will be available upon request from SEA 02. Requests for missing reference(s) shall be directed to Mike Hammersley, Contracting Officer and Danielle Bences, Contract Specialist at james.m.hammersley.civ@us.navy.mil and danielle.m.bences.civ@us.navy.mil |
| 182 | 3/1/22 | 523-11-001 Addendum 1 | 2.2 - 2.4 | Please provide all references listed in paragraphs 2.2. - 2.4 of added work item 523-11-001. | Missing reference(s) will be available upon request from SEA 02. Requests for missing reference(s) shall be directed to Mike Hammersley, Contracting Officer and Danielle Bences, Contract Specialist at james.m.hammersley.civ@us.navy.mil and danielle.m.bences.civ@us.navy.mil |
| 183 | 3/1/22 | 523-11-002 Addendum 1 | 2.2 - 2.4 | Please provide all references listed in paragraphs 2.2. - 2.4 of added work item 523-11-002. | Missing reference(s) will be available upon request from SEA 02. Requests for missing reference(s) shall be directed to Mike Hammersley, Contracting Officer and Danielle Bences, Contract Specialist at james.m.hammersley.civ@us.navy.mil and danielle.m.bences.civ@us.navy.mil |
| 184 | 3/1/22 | 555-13-001 Addendum 1 | 2.2 - 2.10 | Please provide all references listed in paragraphs 2.2. - 2.4 of added work item 555-13-001. | Missing reference(s) will be available upon request from SEA 02. Requests for missing reference(s) shall be directed to Mike Hammersley, Contracting Officer and Danielle Bences, Contract Specialist at james.m.hammersley.civ@us.navy.mil and danielle.m.bences.civ@us.navy.mil |
| 185 | 3/1/22 | 651-90-001 | Drawing 8877640 material list states for | Disregard this partial question. Full question and answer available as #189. | |
| 188 | 3/1/22 | 456-90-001 | 3.1, 3.2.9.6, 3.18, Attch C | Are the temp array covers in 3.2.9.6 already fabricated from previous shipalts or is the fabrication to be included with requirements onf 2.2 - 2.5? | No, this being the first time installed on this coast KTR tasked with fabrication of 4 covers in work item 456-90-001 per para. 3.2.9.6 per Att C . |
| 189 | 3/1/22 | 651-90-001 | Drawing 8877640 material listing references A0001 for the Cable Assembly which shows sealtite conduit; however, there is not any material specs for the conduit. Please provide. | Sealtite is trade name for flexible, liquid-tight conduit. See special note S3 and General note 7. | |
| 191 | 3/2/22 | Amendment 003 | Amendment 0003 was received on 3/1/22. |
Included with Amendment 0003 was Errata 1, which modified 27 work items. The RLAR references (26) have not been received and coupled with many outstanding answers to questions and other issues including Period of Performance changes we cannot complete our proposal by the current due date. Please extend the due date so we (and our subcontractors) can incorporate all these late changes in an orderly manner. We still await answers on over 50 questions so this will extend eventually anyway.
| Per Amendment 0005 the proposal due date has been extended to 12 April 2022. | |||
| 202 | 3/3/22 | Attachment J-3 | The J-3 attachment includes a milestone for 20% Docking reports locked in on 2/9/2023 (cell B8) as well as a Dry dock reports milestone that is calculated based upon the offeror's docking duration (cell B6). These give two different dates for the same drydock report requirement. Will the Government delete the redundant Drydock milestone listed in row 8 of the J-3? |
| Agree, the J-3 provided via Amendment 0005 has deleted row 8 of J-3 on the ""Exec Milestones"" tab |
| 203 | 3/3/22 | Solicitation | Section L, Volume II, Non-Price Factor 3 Past Performance instructions state, “the Offeror shall demonstrate through submission of its Attachment S-9 (Past Performance Questionnaire) its performance on efforts of similar size, scope, and complexity.” The provided Attachment S-9 template requires completion by a Government Evaluator (Sections B and C). In the event the project is included in the CPARS, please clarify if Sections B and C of the Attachment S-9 are to be left blank, or to be completed by the Offeror. | Please see revised Section L language provided via Amendment 0004. | ||
| 204 | 3/4/22 | 321-80-001 | 3.1 | Paragraph 3.1 states to accomplish requirements of 2.2 - 2.4 using 2.5 for guidance. Paragraph 2.2 and 2.5 identify more than the listed 125 ea quantity called out in paragraph 1.3.1 without specific designation of which tubes and assemblies are to be replaced. Contractor requests clarification of designated stuffing tubes to be replace either by amending the work item. At a minimum, specs should include location, size and whether the tube is bent or straight or provide guidance for estimating purposes. | Contractor to bid 125 total stuffing tube assemblies i.e. pipes, connections, and flexible conduit in type C size and plan on at least a 10 degree bend on all 125. | |
| 205 | 3/4/22 | Attachment J-1 | 463-90-001. | Para 3.1 - 3.1.5, 3.8 | Para 3.1 - 3.1.5 states AIT will be responsible for all electrical rip out and installation requirements. Then para 3.3. states to accomplish 2.2 - 2.5. Ref. 2.4 is the electrical drawing. Please confirm the Contractor is NOT responsible for Ref. 2.4 or para 3.8 | Work Item 460-90-001 in Para 3.4 and 3.8 are the contractors responsibility to remove and install the equipment with the exception of the cables. The AIT will be disconnecting and connecting the equipment. |
| 206 | 3/4/22 | 508-11-001 | 3.1 | There are no provisions for including any staging or other services in this item. Please confirm that all areas designated by the SUPERVISOR will not require any staging or additional support for the repairs in para 3.2 and that a RCC will be issued to add these services if required. | Contractor to comply with OSHA Standards and VSRA Standards requiring work that is 4 ft form the floor to have staging. | |
| 207 | 3/4/22 | 508-12-001 | 3.1 | There are no provisions for including any staging or other services in this item. Please confirm that all areas designated by the SUPERVISOR will not require any staging or additional support for the repairs in para 3.2 and that a RCC will be issued to add these services if required. | Contractor to comply with OSHA Standards and VSRA Standards requiring work that is 4 ft form the floor to have staging. | |
| 208 | 3/7/22 | 259-10-001 | 3.5 - 3.5.1 and 3.6 - 3.6.8 | Para 3.5 states to accomplish repairs to EACH BLISS CAP. Para 3.5.1 requires replacement of 80 sqft of deck and 30 sqft of BLISS Cap. Is this quantity for each location or a total for all locations? Are the quantities for para 3.6.1 - 3.6.8 for each location or a total for all locations? | Work items were changed in E3 to read: |
3.5.1 Remove existing and install new 20 square feet of deck and 10 square feet of bulwark located in 1.2.1. The quantities listed in 3.6.1 – 3.6.8 are for each location.
209 3/7/22 259-10-002 3.5 - 3.5.1 and 3.6 - 3.6.8 Para 3.5 states to accomplish repairs to EACH BLISS CAP. Para 3.5.1 requires replacement of 80 sqft of deck and 30 sqft of BLISS Cap. Is this quantity for each location or a total for all locations? Are the quantities for para 3.6.1 - 3.6.8 for each location or a total for all locations? Work items were changed in E3 to read:
3.5.1 Remove existing and install new 20 square feet of deck and 10 square feet of bulwark located in 1.2.1. The quantities listed in 3.6.1 – 3.6.8 are for each location.
| 210 | 3/7/22 | Attachment J-1 | 472-00-001 | 2.4, 5.3 | Para 5.3 states "Kitted Material" provided in the 4720 listed in 2.4. The 4720 does not show this shipalt on the document. Please provide the GFM list for this item. | Reference 2.3 is a Controlled Drawing. The pertinent portions for the equipment being worked are sheet 5 of 21 Tiles R,S,T sheet 11 of 21 Tiles AP,AR,AS and sheet 12 of 21 Tiles AU,AW,AX. The GFM kit is 36 sheets of Type 3R PCMS tiles. REV Q that is listed as the DWG in reference 2.3 will be changed to REV S per the tech code instructions. |
| 211 | 3/10/22 | Solicitation | Contractor downloaded available Amendment 0004 late yesterday (3/9/22). This amendment references Erratas 3 and 4 which HAVE NOT been received. We are extremely disappointed that an extension of the bid date has not been granted after multiple reasonable requests, especially now that we have more new information to incorporate into our proposal. This will require input from our subcontractors, many of which are small businesses with limited resources. All of this takes time and effort to provide our best proposal to the Government. |
Please extend the due date for proposals to at least April 26, 2022 in order to allow receipt, review, preparation and incorporation of new information. This is still almost 7 months before the planned arrival date.
| The proposal due date has been extended to 12 April 2022 via Amendment 0005 | ||||||
| 212 | 3/10/22 | Section L | In light of the work item changes in Errata #3 and Errata #4, on top of the changes received last week in Errata #2, we request an extension of the proposal due date to Tuesday, April 12. These changes are delaying subcontractors, especially specialty subcontractors, from providing their quotes in time to support the current proposal due date. | The proposal due date has been extended to 12 April 2022 via Amendment 0005 | ||
| 214 | 3/10/22 | Attachment J-1 | 251-32-001 & 231-32-003 | The Government's response to #104 & 105 does NOT completely answer the question. Please confirm the contractor is to strip the spaces of all insulation in order to accomplish inspection, repairs and preservation. | Please refer to the referenced DWG referenced in the work item for any applicable insulation and/or interferences based on work location in the work item and or references in the work item. |
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .