N00024-20-R-5500_Draft_2019-09-06.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until local time

A

X B

X C

D

EX

X

G

F

82 - 109

X H 110 - 119

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

1 119

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N00024 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

2 - 40

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

41 - 69 J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

70 - 71

72 - 77 K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 78 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS

PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS

79 - 80

PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N0002420R5500

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN

Number

Each

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR

FPI

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR Production - Leader Only

FOB: Destination

TARGET COST

TARGET PROFIT

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

SHARE RATIO ABOVE TARGET

SHARE RATIO BELOW TARGET

CLIN 0001 STEPLADDER PRICING

STEPLADDER PRICING

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-

6(V)1)

0001 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00 4.00

OPTION DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) Backfit

FPI

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) AMDR Backfit - Leader Only

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 0004 STEPLADDER PRICING

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-

6(V)4)

0004 1.00 1.00

OPTION Enhanced Data Rights in AN/SPY-6

FFP

Enhanced Data Rights in AN/SPY-6

NET AMT

1 Bundle

OPTION Provisioned Item Order (PIO)

FFP

Provisioned Item Order (PIO)

AN/SPY-6 Data Items

DATA for all base and option CLIN(s) (if exercised).

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)1 FAQT and dPCA AMDR

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)1 First Article Qualification Testing (FAQT) and dPCA AMDR

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)2 FAQT and dPCA EASR Rotator

AN/SPY-6(V)2 FAQT and dPCA EASR Rotator

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)3 FAQT and dPCA Fixed Face

AN/SPY-6(V)3 FAQT and dPCA EASR Fixed Face

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)4 FAQT and dPCA AMDR Backfit

AN/SPY-6(V)4 FAQT and dPCA AMDR Backfit

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION Second Source Qualification

Second Source Qualification

FFP

12 Months

Engineering and Production Support

FFP

Engineering and Production Support

OPTION AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 0020 STEPLADDER PRICING

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM

SUSTAINMENT

SEE NOTE B SEE NOTE B

OPTION AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 0021 STEPLADDER PRICING

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS

OPTION AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 0022 STEPLADDER PRICING

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC

OPTION AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 0023 STEPLADDER PRICING

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC

OPTION DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR Production

(See Section B Note A)

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 1001 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)1)

1001 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)2 EASR Rotator

AN/SPY-6(V)2 EASR Rotator Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 1002 STEPLADDER PRICING

EASR Rotator (AN/SPY-

6(V)2)

1002 1.00 1.00

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)3 EASR Fixed Face

AN/SPY-6(V)3 EASR Fixed Face Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 1003 STEPLADDER PRICING

EASR 3 Fixed (AN/SPY-

6(V)3)

1003 1.00 1.00

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) AMDR Backfit

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 1004 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)4)

1004 1.00 1.00

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 1020 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 1021 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 1022 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 1023 STEPLADDER PRICING

(See Section B Notes A and D)

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 2001 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)1)

2001 1.00 1.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 2002 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)2)

2002 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00

5.00

4.00

5.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 2003 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)3)

2003 1.00 1.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 2004 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)4)

2004 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 2020 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 2021 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 2022 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader

Only

CLIN 2023 STEPLADDER PRICING

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 3001 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)1)

3001 1.00 1.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 3002 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)2)

3002 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00

5.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 3003 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)3)

3003 1.00 1.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 3004 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)3)

3004 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 3020 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 3021 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 3022 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader

Only

CLIN 3023 STEPLADDER PRICING

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 4001 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)1)

4001 1.00 1.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 4002 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)2)

4002 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

5.00 5.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 4003 STEPLADDER PRICING

EASR 3 Fixed(AN/SPY-

6(V)3)

4003 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00

5.00

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 4004 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)4)

4004 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 4020 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 4021 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 4022 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 4023 STEPLADDER PRICING

NOTE A - OPTION EXERCISE

NOTE A - OPTION EXERCISE

Even number of units will be distributed equally between the Leader and Challenger for the following CLINs:

Even number of units will be distributed equally between the Leader and Challenger for the following CLINs only if each contractor is meeting all contract requirements including Section F delivereies for one or more previously awarded N00024-20-R-5500 CLIN(s):

After the equal distribution of units, determination of award of any remaining unit will be based on total combined price of all exercised unit(s) per variant per year.

Option Exercise Example:

Assume exercise quantities are as follows: .

FY Total QTY FY Leader QTY FY Challenger QTY

DDG51 FLT III (AN/SPY-

6(V)1

3* 1 1

DDG51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-

6(V)4

3* 1 1

EASR 3 Fixed (AN/SPY-

6(V)3)

4** 2 2

*Odd unit for this AN/SPY-6(V) variant will be competed between the Leader and Challenger based on above exercise criteria. The even number of units within the total quantity will be distributed equally between the two awardees.

**Even number of units for this AN/SPY-6(V) variant will be distributed equally between the two awardees.

FY Total

QTY

FY Leader

Stepladder

Pricing

FY Challenger

Stepladder Pricing

DDG51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1 3 QTY 1 - $23/EA

QTY 2 - $16/EA

QTY 1 - $23/EA

QTY 2 - $18/EA

DDG51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4 3 QTY 1 - $20/EA

QTY 2 - $15/EA

QTY 1 - $23/EA

QTY 2 - $16/EA

EASR 3 Fixed (AN/SPY-6(V)3) 4 QTY 1 - $8/EA

QTY 2 - $6/EA

QTY 1 - $10/EA

QTY 2 - $8/EA

AN/SPY-6(V)1 Quantity Determination-–The award of one (1) unit to the Challenger and two (2) units to the Leader results in the lowest total price for the total FY quantity of three

(3) units.

AN/SPY-6(V)4 Quantity Determination- While the Leader has a lowest unit price for a quantity of two (2) the lowest total price for the total FY quantity of three (3) is the award of two (2) units to the Challenger and one (1) unit to the Leader.

AN/SPY-6(V)3 Quantity Determination- Both the Leader and Challenger are awarded a quantity of (2) for the AN/SPY-6(V)3 based on the equal division of the even number of units.

Although the Government intends to unilaterally exercise odd-numbered option unit(s) with either the Leader or the Challenger based upon the lowest option unit(s) target price established as a result of competitive solicitation N00024-20-R-5500; prior to the latest option exercise date, the Contracting Officer may issue a letter to the Contractors requesting submission of revised pricing. Revised pricing shall be submitted within 30 days of the issuance of the Contracting

Officer request. In the event of requested pricing revision(s):

a. Any revised target price shall not exceed the awarded target price of the applicable option(s); any revised ceiling price shall not exceed the awarded ceiling price of the applicable option(s).

b. The Navy will unilaterally modify Section B pricing using the Contractor provided revised pricing for the CLINs as applicable.

c. The Government intends to unilaterally exercise options in accordance with thie Note utilizing the revised pricing. The exercise of any option unit is contingent upon congressional appropriation.

NOTE B - SUSTAINMENT QUANTITY

The Contractor shall propose the stepladder quantity breaks per Sustainment CLIN up to the specified maximum RMA LRU quantities provided in Table B.1.

Table B.1 – Sustainment Maximum RMA LRU Quantities

OY1 OY2 OY3 OY4 OY5

TRIMMs

CLINs 0020, 1020, 2020, 3020, and 4020 151 314 833 1332 1854

DREX FS

CLINs 0021, 1021, 2021, 3021, and 4021 13 28 74 119 166

DREX DC

CLINs 0022, 1022, 2022, 3022, and 4022 31 66 174 279 388

DREX APCC

CLINs 0023, 1023, 2023, 3023, and 4023 11 22 60 96 133

For all Sustainment option CLINs with stepladder pricing, the Government may unilaterally exercise a given line item more than once prior to the latest option exercise date identified in clause FAR 52.217-7 (see Section I, below). Sustainment option CLINs with stepladder pricing may be exercised until the total quantity purchased equals the maximum quantity listed for that option CLIN in Section B. Any exercised option shall be in accordance with the latest drawing revision unless otherwise specified in the modification.

If any Sustainment option CLIN is exercised more than once within a 60 day period, the unit price shall be adjusted downward to reflect the appropriate stepladder unit price for the entire quantity purchased within that 60 day period. The following hypothetical example illustrates how pricing will be adjusted for option CLIN 0000 if the line item is unilaterally exercised more than once within a 60 day period:

At first option exercise, $22,500 is obligated to subline item (SLIN) 0000AA to provide funds to acquire a quantity of 150 at a unit cost of $150.

150 * $150 = $22,500

A second option exercise, $12,500 is obligated to SLIN 0000AB to provide funds to acquire a total quantity of 350 at a unit cost of $100.

350 * $100 = $35,000

In order to provide for a total extended price of $35,000 without altering the unit pricing of the prior option exercise, the unit cost for SLIN 0000AB is adjusted downward to

$62.50.

($35,000 - $22,500) / 200 = $62.50

Following exercise of our first two options for CLIN 0000, our contract CLIN structure for CLIN 0000 is as follows:

CLIN SLIN UNIT COST EXTENDED

PRICE

FUNDED

AMOUNT

0000 $100.00 $35,000 $35,000

0000 AA $150.00 $22,500 $22,500

0000 AB $62.50 $12,500 $12,500

NOTE C - SUSTAINMENT METRICS

Prices for CLINs 2020-2023, 3020-3023, and 4020-4023 are based upon the Contractor achieving the total Contractor Response Time (CRT), Requestion Fill Rate (RFR), and

Maximum Contractor Fill Time (MaxCFT) requirements in Section C 3.3. If the Contractor performs below the CRT, RFR, and MaxCFT requirements, assessed independently for each metric, and within levels stated in Tables C.1, and C.2 below, downward price adjustments shall apply.

Calculation of the downward adjustment (i.e. Total Price Adjustment) to each RMA LRU CLIN price is provided below. Total awarded CLIN price will be based on the total awarded quantities within the requisition period for each RMA LRU CLIN. The actual RMA LRU Demands is provided in the Sustainment Execution Report (CDRL A049).

Table C.1

If CRT Achieved is: CRT Price Adjustment Factor

(per requestion period)

CRT≥0.9 0

0.9>CRT≥0.85 0.5 * (CRT - 0.85)

0.85>CRT≥0.8 0.6 * (CRT - 0.8) + 0.025

CRT<0.8 0.85 * (0.8 - CRT) + 0.055

CRT Price Adjustment = CRT Price Adjustment Factor * Total Awarded CLIN Price

Example:

Total Awarded CLIN Price = $750,000

CRT Achieved = 82%

CRT Price Adjustment Factor = 0.6 * (0.82 - 0.8) + 0.025 = 0.037

CRT Price Adjustment = 0.037 * $750,000 = $27,750

Note:

The CRT Price Adjustment is performed for each RMA LRU CLIN and is summed to determine the Aggregated CRT Price Adjustment.

Table C.2

If RFR Achieved is: RFR Price Adjustment Factor

(per performance period)

RFR≥0.9 0

0.9>RFR≥0.85 0.5 * (RFR - 0.85)

0.85>RFR≥0.8 0.6 * (RFR - 0.8) + 0.025

RFR<0.8 0.85 * (0.8 - RFR) + 0.055

RFR Price Adjustment = RFR Price Adjustment Factor * Total Awarded CLIN Price

RFR Achieved = 60%

RFR Price Adjustment Factor = 0.85 * (0.8 - 0.6) + 0.055 = 0.225

RFR Price Adjustment = 0.225 * $750,000 = $168,750

The RFR Price Adjustment is performed for each RMA LRU CLIN and is summed to determine the Aggregated RFR Price Adjustment.

To calculate Price Adjustment for MaxCFT, the calculation is as follows:

MaxCFT Price Adjustment = (# Actual RMA LRU Demands that exceed MaxCFT requirements

/ # LRU Quantities Placed in Requistions) * (Total Awarded CLIN Price) * 0.5 + (# Actual

RMA LRU Demands that exceed 3*MaxCFT requirements / # LRU Quantities Placed in

Requistions) * (Total Awarded CLIN Price) * 0.5

# LRU Quantities Placed in Requistions = 200

# Actual RMA LRU Demands that exceed MaxCFT requirements: three (3) C1 CASREP RMA

LRUs at 17 Calendar Days, one (1) IPG 1 RMA LRU at 92 Calendar days

MaxCFT Price Adjustment = (3+1)/200*$750,000*0.5 + (1)/200*$750,000*0.5 = $9,375

The MaxCFT Price Adjustment is performed for each RMA LRU CLIN and is summed to determine the Aggregated MaxCFT Price Adjustment.

Total Price Adjustment = Aggregated CRT Price Adjustment + Aggregated RFR Price

Adjustment + Aggregated MaxCFT Price Adjustment

Example Total Price Adjustment: $27,750+168,750+9,375 = $205,875

New Total CLIN Price After Adjustment: $544,125

NOTE D - PRODUCTION METRICS

Prices for CLINs 2001-2004, 3001-3004, and 4001-4004 are based upon the Contractor completing Section C scope and delivering Government-accepted equipment on time in accordance with Section F. If the Contractor does not complete Section C scope and deliver

Government-accepted equipment on time IAW Section F, the following adjustment will be made for each affected CLIN:

0-14 Days Late = No adjustment to CLIN

15-59 Days Late = The Government Share of the Above Target Ratio is reduced buy 10

60+ Days Late = The Government Share of the Above Target Ratio is reduced buy 20

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

STATEMENT OF WORK

1 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the effort required for production, assembly, inspection, testing, delivery and sustainment of AN/SPY-6(V) Radar Systems and supporting equipment.

This effort is to build AN/SPY-6(V) systems in accordance with the Technical Data Package

(TDP), provided as Government Furnished Information (GFI) and as referenced in Section J.

The efforts defined by this SOW are in support of Hardware Production and Sustainment.

1.1 Background

The scope of this effort is divided between two Contractor roles that may be awarded as two contracts by the Government: a “Leader” role and “Challenger” role. Each role is responsible for production, assembly, inspection, testing, and delivery of its assigned AN/SPY-6(V) quantities

(defined in Section B of the contract). The Leader additionally is responsible for RMA Line

Replaceable Units (LRUs) sustainment support of all fielded (post-delivery) AN/SPY-6(V) systems.

AN/SPY-6(V) is a Family of Radars (FoRs) which are designed to be scalable and adaptable across multiple ship classes and mission requirements.

Developed under the AMDR program, the AN/SPY-6(V)1 is the Navy’s next generation radar system that will address Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) and Air Defense (AD) capability gaps identified in the Maritime Air and Missile Defense of Joint Forces (MAMDJF) Initial

Capabilities Document (ICD). The MAMDJF ICD was reviewed and validated by the Joint

Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) on 1 May 2006, culminating in the designation of the

Navy as the lead component. The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and

Logistics (USD(AT&L)) directed the Navy to proceed with an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) for MAMDJF on 16 June 2006. The Director of Program Analysis and Evaluation endorsed the radar portion (Phase I) of the AoA on 27 Oct 2008, finding the AoA sufficient. The AMDR

Capability Production Document (CPD) was approved by the JROC in March 2018. AN/SPY-

6(V)1 is an Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) radar providing sensitivity for long range detection and engagement of advanced threats. The AN/SPY-6(V)1 is currently planned to be deployed on the DDG 51 FLT III with four arrays each populated with 37 Radar Modular

Assemblies (RMAs).

A variant of the AN/SPY-6(V) is currently planned to replace the AN/SPY-1D(V) radar on existing DDG 51 FLT IIA ships. This variant includes four arrays each populated with 24

RMAs. The nomenclature has not yet been assigned, but the program anticipates it being designated as AN/SPY-6(V)4. The U.S. Navy is proceeding with the modernization of DDG 51

FLT IIA ships by replacing the existing AN/SPY-1D(V) with a scaled AN/SPY-6(V) radar to increase IAMD performance against raids of air and ballistic missile threats in adverse environments. The goal of this radar back fit is to significantly improve operational capability, while taking into account the constraints imposed by the existing FLT IIA hull (e.g., power, weight, and equipment space). The back fit of the scaled AN/SPY-6(V) will be installed during planned FLT IIA shipyard availabilities in order to minimize cost. The Navy plans to capitalize on the Aegis Weapons System Baseline 10 (BL10) and integrate with the AN/SPY-6(V)4.

Enterprise Air Surveillance Radar (EASR) is two scaled variants of AN/SPY-6(V) for non-DDG platforms. Two array configurations will be fielded. The configurations are a single rotating array with 9 RMAs (AN/SPY-6(V)2) and three arrays each populated with 9 RMAs (AN/SPY-

6(V)3 and, notionally, AN/SPY-6(V)5). EASR is one sensor in a new sensor suite that is designed to meet the performance needs contained in the Battlespace Awareness ICD. The specific system performance requirements are documented in the Enterprise Radar Suite Naval

Capabilities Document (ERS NCD). EASR variants utilize AN/SPY-6(V) radar technology to meet the air surveillance requirements of multiple ship classes. AN/SPY-6(V)2 radars are planned to replace the AN/SPS-48 and AN/SPS-49 radars aboard CVN (Nimitz), Landing

Helicopter Assault (LHA) hulls, and Landing Platform/Dock (LPD) hulls with Ship Self-Defense

System (SSDS) ACB20. AN/SPY-6(V)3 replace Dual Band Radar (DBR) on CVN(Ford) class platforms and are the primary surveillance and fire control radars for FFG(X) class platforms with the Frigate Weapon System (FWS) (FFG(X) variants may become AN/SPY-6(V)5). The architecture for EASR is intended to drive a lower recurring cost by utilizing the same core technology for variants on multiple ship classes.

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents of issue in effect on the execution date of the contract are applicable to this Statement of Work and attached appendices to the extent specified herein or as modified under the contract. In accordance with CDRL XXXX the Contractor shall complete a GFI

Deficiency Report.

2.1 Mandatory Documents

The following documents form a basis for the work to be performed under this SOW:

a. AN/SPY-6(V) System Requirements Document, Version X.x, with Appendices, included as Attachment J-XX

b. Air and Missile Defense Radar External (Logical) Interface Requirements

Specification (IRS)

c. Enterprise Air Surveillance Radar (Logical) Interface Requirements Specification

(IRS)

d. Department of Defense Security Classification Specification (DD-254), Revision

No. 03, and Air & Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) Program Security

Classification Guide, Version 6.0, included as Attachment J-XX.

e. Air and Missile Defense Radar Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical (HM&E)

Interface Requirements Document, Version 2.4, included as Attachment J-XX .

f. Air and Missile Defense Radar Back Fit Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical

(HM&E) Interface Requirements Document, Version 1.5, included as Attachment

J-XX.

g. Program Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Data Dictionary, included as

Attachment J-XX

h. Cyber Strategy, Version TBD, included as Attachment J-XX

i. Department of the Navy (DON) Chief Information Officer (CIO) Memorandum

02-10, Information Assurance Policy Update for Platform Information

Technology, dated 26 April 2010

j. DoD Instruction (DoDI) 8500.01 Cybersecurity, dated 13 March 2014

k. DoDI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information

Technology (IT), dated 28 June 2017

l. NSTISSAM COMPUSEC/1-99, dated 11 March 1999

m. Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) Program Protection Plan (PPP), Version

1.1, Tailored Contract Version, dated 9 March 2018, included as Attachment J-

XX

n. MIL-STD-31000B – Technical Data Packages, dated 31 October 2018

o. IEEE 12207.2017 – Standard for Systems and Software Engineering - Software

Life Cycle Processes, dated 28 Sept 2017

p. Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) Programmatic, Environmental, Safety and Health Evaluation (PESHE) Plan, Version 1.0, included as Attachment J-XX

q. MIL-STD-882E Safety, dated 11 May 2012

r. NAVSEA S9310-AQ-SAF-010, Technical Manual for Batteries, Navy Lithium

Safety Program and Procedures, dated 19 Aug 2004

s. NAVSEAINST 9310.1B, Naval Lithium Battery Safety Program, dated 13 Jun

t. MIL-HDBK-189C, Reliability Growth Management, dated 14 June 2011

u. GEIA-STD-0009 - Reliability Program Standard For Systems Design, Development And Manufacturing, dated 13 Nov 2008

v. ASQC Q9001-2008, Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance In-Depth, Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing

w. Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP), Version 2.0, Contractor Copy, dated 06 March 2013, included as Attachment J-

XX

x. Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Plan, included as Attachment J-XX

y. Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), Version 2.0, Tailored Contract Version, dated 04 February 2013, included as

Attachment J-XX

z. PEO IWS / Naval Sea Systems Command Research & System Engineering

Warfare System Engineering and Human Systems Integration Directorate

Technical Review Manual (TRM), Version 2, dated 18 December 2009

aa. OPNAVINST 5100.24B, Navy System Safety Program Policy, dated 06 Feb 2007

bb. NAVSEAINST 5100.12B, Requirements For Naval Sea Systems Command

System Safety Program For Ships, Shipborne Systems And Equipment, dated 03

Aug 2011

cc. AMDR System Safety Program Plan

dd. Executive Order (EO) 12856, 03 Aug 1993

ee. Executive Order (EO) 13148, 21 April 2000

ff. National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 411, dated July 1993

gg. SAE-GEIA-STD-0007B - Logistics Product Data, dated 01 May 2013

hh. MIL-STD-1472G, Change 1 – Human Engineering, dated 17 Jan 2019

ii. ASTM F1166-07(2013), Marine Systems, Equipment and Facilities, Human

Engineering Design for, dated 2013

jj. MIL-STD-130N, Change 1, Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, dated 16 November 2012

kk. OPNAVINST 1500.57B, Surface Warfare Training Strategy, 26 September 2011

ll. ANSI/EIA-748, Earned Value Management ?Systems, dated 17 Aug 1999

mm. CSDR Manual DoD 5000.04, Change 1, dated 18 April 2018

nn. MIL-STD-881D – Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, dated

09 April 2018

oo. USD(AT&L) Memorandum, Use of Acquisition Program Transition Workshops, dated 01 April 2011

pp. NFPA70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2018 Edition.

qq. Technical Data Package (TDP), Attachment J-XX

rr. MIL-STD-1568D - Materials And Processes for Corrosion Prevention And

Control In Aerospace Weapons Systems, date 31 Aug 2015

2.2 Guidance Publications

The following publications are available as guidance:

ss. SAE-GEIA-HB-0007A: Handbook For GEIA-STD-0007- Logistic Product Data, dated 10 Feb 2014

tt. PEO IWS 2.0 Risk Management Policy

uu. Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy, NAVSEAINST 5000.8, dated 21 Jul

vv. Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, Version 1.0, dated August 2006

ww. DoD Directive 5200.39, Change 2, Critical Program Information (CPI)

Identification and Protection Within Research, Development, Test, and

Evaluation (RDT&E), 15 Oct 2018

xx. NAVSEAINST 9400.2, Implementation of Naval Sea Systems Command

(NAVSEA) Afloat IA Governance and Guidance, dated 18 Aug 2010

yy. MIL-DTL-901E – Shock Tests, H.I. (High-Impact) Shipboard Machinery, Equipment, and Systems, Requirements for, dated 20 June 2017

zz. MIL-HDBK-2155, Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action Taken, 11

Dec 1995 aaa. NAVSEAINST 8020.6E - Department of the Navy Weapon Systems Explosive

Safety Review Board, dated 11 March 2008 bbb. NAVSEA SW020-AH-SAF-010, Weapons System Safety Guidelines Handbook, 01 Feb 2006 ccc. DoDI 5000.02, Change 4, dated 31 Aug 2018 ddd. MIL-HDBK-217F-2 – Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment, dated 28

Feb 1995 eee. MIL-HDBK-472-1 – Maintainability Prediction, dated 12 Jan 1984 fff. MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance, dated 07 Feb 2001 ggg. ANSI/EIA 649B, National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management, dated 01 Apr 2011 hhh. SAE-GEIA-HB-649A, Configuration Management Standard Implementation

Guide, 01 March 2016

iii. PEO IWS 2.0 Above Water Sensors Configuration Management Plan/Procedures jjj. NAVSEA A Program Manager’s Guide to the Application of Performance Based

Logistics (PBL), Revision A, dated 08 October 2008 kkk. Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD

(AT&L)) Corrosion and Prevention Control Planning Guidebook of September lll. DoD Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

Guidebook: A Guidebook of Best Practices for Implementing a Robust DMSMS

Management Program (SD-22A), 01 Jan 2016 mmm. DoN Automatic Identification Technology (AIT) Implementation Manual, dated

June 2006 nnn. RAMSC Plan (EASR CDRL A096)—Move to Guidance

2.3 Precedence

In the event of a conflict between the documents listed in Section 2.1, Mandatory Documents, and Section 2.2, Guidance Publications, the documents in Section 2.1 shall take precedence.

3 Requirements

3.1 General Requirements (CLINs 0001, 0004, 1001-1004, 2001-2004, 3001-3004, 4001-

4004)

3.1.1 Post Award Conference (CLINs 0001 & 0017 only)

A post award conference shall take place at the contractor’s facility no later than 30 days after award of the contract. The purpose of this conference is to review the initial production plans.

The contractor shall deliver a conference agenda in accordance with CDRL A001 no later than one week before the date of the post award conference. The contractor shall deliver meeting minutes/actions in accordance with CDRL A003 no later than one week after completion of the post award conference.

3.1.2 Technical Data Package

The Contractor shall support the maintenance of the TDP (initial baseline provided as

Attachment J-2) in accordance with the configuration management processes in Section 3.1.5.

The TDP will be maintained in the Government’s Product Data Management (PDM) system during execution of this contract (description of this system is provided in Attachment J-XX).

Any required updates to the TDP for produciblity and obsolescence shall be accounted for underneath the AN/SPY-6(V) production CLINs. No further costs of design changes are authorized. No contractor responsible design corrections are chargeable to any Engineering

Support CLINs.

The Contractor shall prepare and deliver an updated Technical Data Package (TDP) describing in detail the as-built product baseline at a production level (Level 3) in accordance with MIL-STD-

31000B. The TDP shall describe any and all subsequent changes to the baseline product including revisions up to the time of Government acceptance to reflect the final as-built configuration. The TDP shall include any software products, including source code necessary for diagnostic and troubleshooting purposes and source code for any other software and firmware developed for the radar. Unless otherwise noted, the Government will have at least Government

Purpose Rights for all data delivered under the TDP. The Contractor shall submit the TDP in accordance with CDRLs A005 through A017:

A005 HM&E Interface Requirements Specification (IRS)

A006 HW Interface Design Description (IDD)

A007 System/Subsystem Specification (SSS) A Specs

A008 System/Subsystem Specification (SSS) B2 Specs

A009 Interactive Computer Aided Provisioning System (ICAPS) Data File Exchange

A010 Logistics Product Data (LPD)

A011 Maintenance Manual

A012 Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists

A013 Second Source Lowest Replacement Unit (LRU) Description Document

A014 Special Packaging Instructions

A015 Technical Data Package

A016 Interface Control Document (ICD)

A017 System/Subsystem Specification (SSS) B5 Spec Software Configuration Items

3.1.3 Plan Execution

The Contractor shall generate, maintain, and execute the System Engineering Management Plan

(SEMP) (CDRL A061). The SEMP shall address all efforts within the HP&S contract. The

SEMP shall describe how a fully integrated production and sustainment effort will be managed and conducted. The Contractor shall generate, maintain, and execute the Risk Management Plan

(RMP) as part of the SEMP. The Contractor shall implement and maintain a risk management program in accordance with the approved RMP to identify and manage risks associated with achievement of the program’s technical (including performance), cost, and schedule requirements. Risks shall be reported to the Government during IPT/WG meetings as well as In-

Progress Reviews (IPRs). PEO IWS 2.0 Risk Management Policy, NAVSEAINST 5000.8

(Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy), and Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, Version 1.0, dated August 2006, are available as guidance.

The Contractor shall form Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) and Working Groups (WGs) to support an integrated product development process. The Contractor shall generate the organizational structure and document it in the SEMP (CDRL A056). The Government will assign representatives to participate in IPT/WG meetings as necessary. Government participation will be coordinated through the COR.

The Contractor shall generate and execute a Program Protection Implementation Plan (PPIP)

(CDRL A055) in accordance with the AMDR Program Protection Plan (PPP). DoDI 5000.02, DoDI 5200.39 and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Systems Engineering PPP Outline and Guidance Template are available as guidance. The PPIP shall cover production for both

Leader and Challenger as well as sustainment for the Leader.

The PPIP shall be prepared in order to ensure effective and efficient protection of essential program information, technologies and systems. The Program Protection Implementation Plan

(PPIP) is derived from the PPP and will not only restate what is written in the PPP. The PPIP shall include:

a. Description of the security management structure;

b. Description of the Contractor’s Information Security Program (ISP) as a part of their

PPIP. As an integral part of the ISP, describe the Contractor and subcontractors procedures for identifying, reporting and resolution of Facility Security Breaches;

Classified Information Compromises, and Spillages including notification of DSS, DCMA, and Government Program Security Manager

c. Describe how the contractor’s Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber Security is addressed in the contractor’s facility and addressed in subcontracts and how incidents are addressed and reported to DSS / DCMA

d. Identification of CPI physical locations under the Contractor’s or Subcontractors’ control;

e. Assessment of the vulnerability of the CPI to intelligence collection in the following areas: Human Intelligence (HUMINT); Open Source Intelligence (OSINT); Signals

Intelligence (SIGINT); Imagery Intelligence (IMINT); Computer Network Operations

(CNO);

f. Identification of the countermeasures to be implemented at each site where CPI is held;

g. Special handling procedures required for CPI, and procedures for recovering CPI in the event of a mishap;

h. Identification of risk mitigation techniques to counter threats and counterfeit parts to the

Contractor’s supply chain; and

i. Procedures for ensuring compliance with U.S. Government export statutes and regulations.

The Contractor shall generate a Manufacturing Plan (CDRL A026). The Manufacturing Plan documents methods by which the design is to be built. The Manufacturing Plan contains sequence and schedule of events at contractor and subcontractor levels that define use of materials, fabrications flow, test equipment, tools, facilities, and personnel. It reflects consideration and incorporation of manufacturing requirements in the design process and includes identification and assessment of design facilities. For systems and components that are designed to higher Evaluated Assurance Levels (EALs), the Manufacturing Plan identifies the physical and personnel controls needed in the manufacturing process to meet Cyber requirements.

In addition, the Manufacturing Plan shall identify production metrics for the key subsystems.

Key subsystems include the Transmit/Receive channels and other array and Receiver/Exciter

LRUs of costs greater than 10% of the total system production cost per shipset.

The Contractor shall generate, implement and maintain a Hazardous Material Management

Program (HMMP) Plan (CDRL A060). The Contractor shall document that consideration has been given to eliminating and reducing the use of Hazardous Materials (HM) in processes and products consistent with the requirements of EO 12856, EO 13148 and NAS 411. The HMMP shall address requirements for hazardous materials and elimination, minimization, substitution and handling of hazardous materials and potentially hazardous materials. The HMMP shall describe the HM analysis that will be used to identify HM risks, the strategy for integrating HM considerations into the systems engineering process, HM responsibilities and the method for tracking progress of the HM analysis. The Contractor shall manage the selection, use, and disposal of hazardous materials so that the DoD incurs the lowest cost necessary to protect human health and the environment over the life cycle. The Contractor shall generate HMMP

Reports (CDRL A061) that identify the characteristics, quantity and location of all hazardous materials.

The Contractor shall generate, implement, maintain a QA Program that is integral to the overall production process. The Contactor shall generate a QA Program Plan (CDRL A043). The QA

Program shall be comprised of management, technical resources, plans, procedures, schedules and controls necessary to ensure conformance to contractual requirements. The QA Program shall address the requirements of ASQC Q9001-2008. The QA Program shall also address the software and firmware quality provisions of IEEE 12207. The software and firmware design, documentation and review process shall be in accordance with current standard business practices that represent the approved processes for the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) level

IV. For validation of 3D Model Data, MIL-STD-31000B, Appendix C, is available for guidance.

The Contractor shall generate and implement a Corrosion Prevention and Control Plan (CDRL

A034) IAW MIL-STD-1568D and using the DoD Corrosion and Prevention Control Planning

Guidebook of September 2007 as guidance. The Contractor shall ensure that corrosion prevention and management are included in the AN/SPY-6(V) design. The Contractor shall report corrosion activity at IPTs/WGs and SETRs.

3.1.4 Production Progress

The Contractor shall conduct IPRs to review progress of the subsystem, software, and system builds, integration and testing efforts. IPRs shall be scheduled quarterly. The first IPR shall address readiness of manufacturing processes, quality systems, and production planning. The

Contractor shall host the IPRs, and coordinate meetings with the Government. The Contractor shall coordinate and post Meeting Agendas (CDRL A001) on the Government IDE prior to meetings. The Contractor shall post Presentation Materials (CDRL A002) and Minutes/Action

Items (CDRL A003) on the Government IDE.

The Contractor shall generate a Production Status Report (CDRL A027) for the period from option exercise through delivery of final unit. The reports shall include the production metrics identified in the Manufacturing Plan (CDRL A026). The reports shall address production metrics, including components procured, assembly and testing. The reports shall address labor efforts and facility utilization. The reports shall address material efforts, including procurement, inventory, expenditures, and quality control data. The Contractor shall provide a consistent format for the reporting of metrics for the radar.

3.1.5 Configuration Management (CM)

The Contractor shall generate and execute a AN/SPY-6(V) CM Plan (CDRL A033) that follows the requirements in this section, using MIL-HDBK-61A, ANSI/EIA 649B, SAE-GEIA-HB-

649A and PEO IWS 2.0 Above Water Sensors Configuration Management Plan/Procedures as guidance. The Government will conduct the AN/SPY-6(V) Local Configuration Control Board

(LCCB) and PEO IWS 2.0 Configuration Control Board (CCB).

The Contractor shall identify all hardware, software, and documentation issues. In addition, the

Government, other HP&S Contractor, and Design Agent Contractor may identify and submit issues to the Contractor. For each issue identified, the Contractor shall generate a Trouble

Report (CDRL A051) and submit to the AN/SPY-6(V) LCCB via the Government’s PDM system. The Contractor shall categorize each Trouble Report using the following criteria.

Priority Definition

1 Prevents the accomplishment of an essential capability, jeopardize safety, security or other requirement designated critical.

2 Adversely affects accomplishment of an essential capability and no workaround exists; adversely affects technical, cost, or schedule risks to the project or to life cycle support of the system, and no work around solution is known.

3 Adversely affects accomplishment of an essential capability, but reasonable workaround solution is known; adversely impacts functions supporting an essential capability; adversely affects effectiveness, technical, cost, or schedule risks to the project or to life cycle support of the system, but a reasonable workaround solution is known.

4 Results in user/operator inconvenience or annoyance but does not affect a required operational or mission-essential capability; results in inconvenience or annoyance for operational or maintenance personnel but does not prevent the accomplishment of the responsibilities of those personnel.

5 Any other effect.

The Government will have approval authority over all Trouble Report categorizations.

The Contractor shall correct all issues associated with Trouble Reports. The Contractor shall conduct sufficient regression testing to ensure that any changes made appropriately correct the issues without introducing additional issues.

The Contractor shall update and submit Trouble Reports with the proposed corrective actions, proposed schedule, and associated cost estimates to the AN/SPY-6(V) LCCB for approval and determination of required change documentation. The Contractor shall generate the approved change documentation. Change documentation includes, but is not limited to Engineering

Change Proposals (ECPs) (CDRL A038), Requests for Deviation (RFDs) (CDRL A049), Request for Waiver (RFWs) (CDRL A045), Notice of Revisions (NORs) (CDRL A041) and/or

Specification Change Notices (SCNs) (CDRL A047). The Contractor shall submit Engineering

Change Proposal System Safety Reports (ECPSSRs) (CDRL A058) in conjunction with ECPs.

The Contractor shall submit Waiver or Deviation System Safety Reports (WDSSRs) (CDRL

A052) in conjunction with RFDs and RFWs to the AN/SPY-6(V) LCCB. The Contractor shall submit change documentation to the AN/SPY-6(V) LCCB for classification and final approval.

The above change documentation shall be submitted via the Government’s PDM system. In addition, all updated TDP materials shall be submitted via the Government’s PDM system in accordance with the LCCB approved change documentation. At all times the official product baseline for production and sustainment shall be that reflected in the Government’s PDM system.

The AN/SPY-6(V) LCCB will have approval authority of Class II ECPs, Minor RFDs, RFWs, NORs and SCNs. The AN/SPY-6(V) LCCB will review and recommend approval/disapproval of Class I ECPs and Major/Critical RFD/RFWs to the PEO IWS 2.0 CCB. The PEO IWS 2.0

CCB will have approval authority of Class I ECPs and Major/Critical RFD/RFWs.

Approval of formal Class I ECPs, if any, will be accomplished via the changes clause of the

Contract.

The Contractor shall participate in the monthly Design Agent LCCB and provide feedback on

Trouble Reports and change documentation in that forum.

3.1.5.1 Trade Studies and Analysis (LEADER ONLY)

Prior to submission of a Class I ECP, the Contractor shall perform trade studies and analysis.

These efforts will include cost estimates, scope estimates, technical investigations, industry surveys, and technical trade-off studies. All results of such trade studies and analysis shall be delivered in the Engineering Design Notebook (EDN) (CDRL A054).

3.1.6 As-Built Configuration Bill of Material List

The Contractor shall generate an As-Built Configuration (ABC) Bill of Material (BOM) List

(CDRL A031) for each the AN/SPY-6(V) production unit, reflecting the delivered the AN/SPY-

6(V) production unit hardware and software.

3.1.7 Factory Acceptance Testing

3.1.7.1 Testing

The Contractor shall generate the Factory Acceptance Test Plan (CDRL A065) and Procedures

(CDRL A066). The OEM Plan and Procedures and the TDP are available as guidance. The

Contractor shall conduct Factory Acceptance Testing on each AN/SPY-6(V) Unit in accordance with Contractor-developed, Government-approved Acceptance Test Plan and Procedures.

The Contractor shall document the results of Factory Acceptance Testing including the as run, redlined, and marked up procedures in a Test Report (CDRL A069). Any marked up procedures shall be reflected in updated Acceptance Test Procedures.

The Contractor shall provide all Test Data (CDRL A067), evaluation tools (including simulations) and results to the Government for independent evaluation of performance. The

Contractor shall notify the Government of planned test events not later than 21 calendar days prior to testing to support Government participation. The Contractor shall notify the

Government of any changes to planned test events not later than seven (7) calendar days before the test. In the event that the Government is not able to witness a test that requires Government attendance and/or approval, a representative from the Contractor’s Quality Engineering organization shall represent the Government’s interest with authority to grant any required approvals. The Contractor shall conduct meetings to review test results with the Government.

3.1.8 Safety

The Contractor shall maintain and execute its System Safety Program in accordance with MIL-

STD-882E and the AMDR System Safety Program Plan in accordance with Task 102.

NAVSEA SW020-AH-SAF-010, Weapons System Safety Guidelines Handbook and DoD Joint

Software Systems Safety Engineering Handbook are available as guidance.

The Contractor shall provide a System Safety Lead with education, safety experience, and certifications sufficient to answer the recommended qualifications for a SSL as delineated in

OPNAVINST 5100.24B, Enclosure (3), table 1 for a program complexity of high.

The Contractor shall provide in the EDN (CDRL A054) an Environment Safety and

Occupational Health (ESOH) assessment that includes data, studies, and reports necessary to demonstrate full compliance with all Federal, State, and Local environmental laws including any known potential compliance issues associated with the system manufacturing, testing, operations, and disposal. In addition, the Contractor shall generate and provide safety documentation in accordance with Task 210, Environmental Hazard Analysis (EHA), of MIL-

STD-882E in the EDN.

The Contractor shall generate and execute the System Safety Program Plan (CDRL A063).

The Contractor shall, in accordance with MIL-STD-882E Task 106, update and maintain the

Closed Loop Hazard Tracking Database (CDRL A057) to meet the requirements found in MIL-

STD-882E and OPNAVINST 5100.24B, Paragraph 8.d.

The Contractor shall, in accordance with MIL-STD-882E Task 301, update and provide the

Safety Assessment Report (CDRL A062).

The Contractor shall support one WSESRB and one SSSTRP. The Contractor shall provide

Presentation Material (CDRL A002) in support of the WSESRB and SSSTRP. The Contractor shall support two (2) one-day dry runs with Government participation for each WSESRB review and each SSSTRP review. The Contractor shall participate in the WSESRB and SSSTRP and present the contractor's system design, policies, and procedures, and respond to all Actions

(CDRL A003) from the WSESRB and SSSTRP within 30 days. NAVSEAINST 8020.6E is available for guidance.

3.1.9 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortage

The Contractor shall support and resolve all LRU, subassembly, or piece part Diminishing

Manufacturing Sources/Material Shortages (obsolescence) issues necessary to execute the requirements of this contract. Efforts under CLIN 4001-4004 shall address any items that require resolution within 24 months.

The Contractor shall generate and execute a Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material

Shortage (DMSMS) Plan (CDRL A037) using DoD DMSMS Guidebook: A Guidebook of Best

Practices for Implementing a Robust DMSMS Management Program (SD-22A) as guidance.

The Contractor shall conduct DMSMS Forecasting and propose solutions in Trouble Reports

(CDRL A051). Proposed solutions shall include analysis of alternatives and impacts to both production and sustainment. In addition, the Contractor shall generate DMSMS Forecast Source

Data and Report (CDRL A036). Summaries of DMSMS Trouble Reports, data and reports shall be reported at IPRs. The Source Data for Forecasting DMSMS shall reference parts, part numbers, and drawing numbers based upon the TDP (as defined in Section 3.1.2).

3.1.10 Failure Reporting and Corrective Action System (FRACAS)

The Contractor shall maintain a Failure Reporting and…