19-R-5380_Bidders_Q&A_3.28.2019.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted

Attached to
FY19-23 MK 41 Vertical Launching System (VLS) Canister Production
Solicitation number
N00024-19-R-5380
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document contains questions and answers related to solicitation number N00024-19-R-5380 for the FY19-23 MK 41 Vertical Launching System (VLS) Canister Production opportunity. The solicitation seeks the production of MK 41 VLS canisters, including ancillary hardware, spares, and associated support equipment in support of U.S. Navy, NATO SEASPARROW Missile Consortium, and Foreign Military Sales requirements. Questions from potential offerors clarify requirements for canister drawings, test items, fit check tools, and pricing attachments. The responses provide corrections that will be included in Amendment 001 to the solicitation.

From the source

19-R-5380 Bidders Q&A 3.28.2019

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N00024-19-R-5380-0003_(Conformed).docx DOCX document
Attachment_22,_Step_Ladder_Pricing_4.18.2019.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_26_-_DFARS_252.227-7018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_25_-_DFARS_252.227-7017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-19-R-5380-0003_(Mod).docx DOCX document
19-R-5380_Bidders_Q&A_4.25.2019.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
19-R-5380_Bidders_Q&A_4.16.2019.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-19-R-5380-0002_(Mod).docx DOCX document
Exhibit_A_and_B,_N00024-19-R-5380_CDRL_4.9.2019.pdf PDF
N00024-19-R-5380-0002_(Conformed).docx DOCX document
Attachment_22,_Step_Ladder_Pricing_4.1.2019.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_10,_Warranty_tracking_4.1.2019.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_10,_Warranty_tracking_3.20.2019.xls XLS spreadsheet
N00024-19-R-5380-0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment_22,_Step_Ladder_Pricing_3.7.2019.xls XLS spreadsheet
N00024-19-R-5380-0001_(Conformed).docx DOCX document
Attachment_1,_SOW_3.26.19.docx DOCX document
19-R-5380_Bidders_Q&A_3.19.2019.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-19-R-5380.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachments.zip ZIP file
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Bidders Q&A 3.28.2019

Question Number:Question Source: (RFP, attachment #, GFI title, etc.)Page number and paragraph header from source:Question:Government Response
2RFPPage 206 Paragraph 1.5, HQ M-2-0006 (b) Page 215Paragraph 1.5 (Pg. 206) states "Each Offeror shall submit only one proposal. No alternate proposals will be accepted, and the submission of multiple proposals will result in rejection of the proposal." On Page 215 Paragraph (b) it suggests the offeror submit two proposals (OFFER A and OFFER B), please clarify. Is there an option to only submit pricing for OFFER B since the majority of the data will be identical?No, offeror must submit OFFER A and may submit OFFER B.
3RFPSection C, page 99, Option Items 0311AB, 0411AB, 0511ABNAVSEA Drawing 7116999 are requirements for MK 25 MOD 0 Canisters. Should this be NAVSEA Drawing 8408701?Yes, this should be NAVSEA drawing 8408701. This will be corrected in Amendment 001.
4RFPSection C, page 100, Option Items 0112AA, 0212AA, 0312AA, 0412AA, 0512AANAVSEA Drawing 8240134 are requirements for MK 21 MOD 3 Canisters. Should this be NAVSEA Drawing 7251721?Yes, this should be NAVSEA drawing 7251721. This will be corrected in Amendment 001.
5RFPSection C, page 104, Option Items 0143, 0243, 0343, 0443, 0543What is the parts list for Option Items 0143, 0243, 0343, 0443, 0543?
There are no associated parts lists for these items.
6Attachment 1, SOWParagraph 3.1Please clarify the Parameters Documents in Section 3.1 for the following: (1) Canister VLS MK 15 MOD 1 w/ PHS&T - should this be NAVSEA Drawing Number 8247157? (2) Canister VLS MK 25 MOD 1 w/ PHS&T - should this be NAVSEA Drawing Number 8408701? (3) Canister VLS MK 29 MOD 0 w/ PHS&T - should this be NAVSEA Drawing Number 8407574?
Yes, these changes have been made in Amendment 001.
7Attachment 1, SOW, Attachment 3, GFPParagraph 4.1Paragraph 4.1 (Page 4) states the Contractor shall be responsible for fabricating or procuring the Canister Internal Fit Check Tool(s) but Attachment 3, GFP includes the fit check tools. Please clarify whether the fit check tools will be provided as GFP or is the Contractor responsible for fabricating or procuring?Fit check tools will be provided to the winning offeror. Attachment 1, Paragraph 4.1 will be amended to remove the requirement to fabricate or procure.
8Attachment 1, SOWParagraph 7.1The test item in Paragraph 7.1 is the original aft closure design (Dwg 5599496) which has been replaced by a new aft closure (Dwg 8407765). Is aft closure 5599496 the correct test item?Amendment 001 will replace drawing 5599496 with 8407765.
9Attachment 1, SOWParagraph 7.2The MK 13 Canister TDP allows 5497292 as an alternate to 7277471. In Paragraph 7.2 only 7277471 is identified. Is 5497292 an acceptable alternate test item?No, the requirement is 7277471.
10Attachment 1, SOWParagraph 7.6Q1: Sub-paragraph 7.6.1 refers to 1 subcell. Is this an error for the Mk 29 canister?

Q2: Sub-paragraph 7.6.5 refers to 4 inert explosive bolts. Should this state 2?

Q3: Sub-paragraph 7.6.6 refers to Note 5 and document 8240330. Are these incorrect for MK 29 MOD 0? Q1 - Amendment 001 will delete "into one subcell" and add "into a MK29 canister".

Q2 - will be updated to qty 2 each Q3 - will be updated to Note 2.3 of Parameters Document 8407574

12RFP, Attachment 22, Step Ladder PricingSection C, Page 98, Option Items 0109, 0209, 0309, 0409, and 0509Option Items are identified in Section C as "Renewed GFP MK 14 MOD 2 Expended Canisters" yet Attachment 22 - Step Ladder Pricing 01.22.2019 defines the same CLIN as "Upgrade GFP MK 14 Mod 1 Canisters with PHS&T to MK 14 Mod 2 (FY19)." Renews and Conversions (upgrade) require different work scope. Which one should be included in the proposal response?The Attachment 22 description is an error. This error will be corrected in Amendment 001.
14RFPSection AIs the DPAS rating of "DO" correct?Yes, the DPAS rating of "DO" is correct.
15Attachment 12, Vendor's Matrix List for PartsN/AAttachment 12 requires the Offeror to include parts with unit costs greater than $1,000. Since there are no evaluation quantities in this solicitation, how does the Offeror determine the unit cost exceeding $1,000? Should the unit prices in this list be based on a specific stepladder quantity (i.e. lower quantities will result in higher unit prices)?Attachment 12 will be deleted
16Attachment 12, Vendor's Matrix List for PartsN/AThe solicitation states (Page 214 Section 3.5.3) Attachment 12 will be incorporated into the contract at award. What is the purpose of making this attachment part of the contract?Attachment 12 will be deleted
17RFPSection C, page 103, Option Items 0140, 0240, 0340, 0440, 0540Is the Government’s intent to procure MK 10 MOD 0 in accordance with NAVSEA Drawing 7546312 or MK 10 MOD 1 in accordance with NAVSEA Drawing 8568603?Amendment 0001 will modify the RFP to cite the MOD 1 (8568603).
18Attachment 1, SOWParagraph 4.1Paragraph 4.1 (Page 4) states the Contractor shall be responsible for fabricating or procuring the Canister Internal Fit Check Tool(s) but Attachment 3, GFP includes the fit check tools. Q1: Please clarify whether the fit check tools will be provided as GFP or is the Contractor responsible for fabricating or procuring. Q2: It appears one of the MK 13 fit check tools (P/N 6386565) is missing from Attachment 3 - GFP, please confirm.The current version of this tool is 6386577 as provided in Attachment 3.
19Attachment 23N/AAttachment 23 - MK 25 MOD 0 to MOD 1 Hardware Requirements List contains part numbers that are "TBD." When will a complete configuration be available?Amendment 0001 will delete Attachment 23 and all associated CLINs (0144, 0244, 0344, 0444 and 0544)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .