Attachment_S3_BQ_PPI_QA2_FINAL.xlsm
XLSM spreadsheet 414 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00024-19-R-4468
About this file
This solicitation announcement provides details for solicitation N00024-19-R-4468 to be issued by the Naval Sea Systems Command for the USS CARNEY (DDG 64) FY20 Extended Dry-Docking Selected Restricted Availability and the USS WINSTON CHURCHILL (DDG 81) FY21 Depot Modernization Period availabilities. The solicitation will require a highly capable contractor with substantial facilities including a DDG 51 class capable pier, dry-dock, and human resources to complete multiple areas of ship maintenance, repair, and modernization over approximately 13 month periods for each ship beginning in July 2020 for USS CARNEY and April 2021 for USS WINSTON CHURCHILL and completing in August 2021 and May 2022 respectively. The solicitation will be competed on a coastwide basis and issued electronically on FedBizOpps with an anticipated release date of 6 September 2019 and anticipated single award date of April 2020. The work package will be released after RFP announcement.
Bidder's Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N00024-19-R-4468_conformed_through_A0002.pdf | ||
| N00024-19-R-4468_A0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_S3_BQ_PPI_QA1_FINAL.xlsm | XLSM spreadsheet | |
| N00024-19-R-4468_A0001.pdf | ||
| N00024-19-R-4468_conformed_through_A0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_S-3_BQ_PPI_A0001.xlsm | XLSM spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_S-9_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_S-1_Manpower_Utilization_Data_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_S-5_Eligibility_Criteria_Data_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_S-6__VATEP.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_S-3_BQ_PPI.xlsm | XLSM spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_J-5_QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_S-8_Pier_and_Drydock_Graphical_Representation_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_S-2_PP_CPARS_Reference_List.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_S-7_Proposal_Assessment.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_J-8_Performance_Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_S-4__Manpower_Plan_to_Actual_Data_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N00024-19-R-4468.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DDG64 Q&A 2
| USS CARNEY (DDG 64) EDSRA Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Questions | ||||
| Drawing | ||||
| GFM | Solicitation #: | N00024-19-R-4468 | Phone | |
| RLAR | TPPC | Justin Lessel, Contract Specialist, justin.d.lessel@navy.mil | 202-781-4064 | |
| Erica Fetter, Contracting Officer, erica.fetter@navy.mil | 202-781-3421 | |||
| The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation. | ||||
| To request references, drawings, RLARs, and Erratas being provided under this Solicitation Question & Answer Set, |
please contact the NAVSEA POCs.
| Work Item No. | Document Number/Title | Question | Government Response | ||
| 167-11-003 | Bolted Equipment Removal Plate (BERP) Secondary Access | ||||
| Install; accomplish | Please provide 167-7024484, Hatch, WT, Raised, Quick Acting, 6-Dog, 24" x 30", 15 PSI-Arrangement | Reference has been corrected via Errata One to 167-7027484 Rev N, DDG51 Class Hatch and Scuttle List. Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 259-80-001 | ShipAlt DDG51-64215D, Gas Turbine (GTRB) Uptake Flange Bolting Replacement; accomplish | Please provide 4720-DDG64-FY20-SA64215-A4, Ship Alteration Material Summary (4720/3) | Reference has been corrected via Errata One to 4720-DDG64-FY20, provided via QA1. | ||
| 474-11-001 | MK 137 MOD 4 and MOD 10 Decoy Launcher; repair | Please provide SW393-C0-TRS-A10, Technical Repair Standard; Launcher MK 137 Mods 7 and 10, Overhaul Procedures | Reference has been corrected via Errata One to SW3930C0-TRS-010, provided via QA1. | ||
| 562-11-002 | Rudderstock Bearing, Rudder Bearing Seal and Rudderstock Seal; replace | Please provide 803-921865 Rev N, Cathodic Protection Hull Zinc Anodes | Reference deleted via Errata One, provided via Amendment 0002. | ||
| 571-41-001 | Fueling at Sea (FAS) Station; repair and preserve | Please provide 803-6983511 Rev B, Deck Drain Insert Composite 1.5 inch and 2.0 inch | Reference updated to Rev C via Errata One, provided via Amendment 0002. | ||
| 643-90-001 | ShipAlt DDG-51-86820K Women At Sea Berthing No. 4, 5, 6 and CPO Berthing No. 2; accomplish | Please provide RLAR 86820/DDG65/1165700, Fix Installation of New Toilet (WC001). Change (F0057) to Part with Valid Pref. Code | Reference corrected via Errata One, RLAR 86820/DDG65/1165700. Reference provided via Amendment 0002. | ||
| 655-11-001 | Washer Extractor No. One; replace | Please provide 320-6566929 Rev L, One Line Diagram Power - 60 Hertz | Reference updated to Rev U via Errata One, ref provided via Amendment 0002. | ||
| Solicitation | Carney Work Package J-1 and Churchill Package J-11 | There is no work item contained in the Carney specification package that covers the direct expense for labor and materials required to install temporary deck covering. There is a specification in the Winston Churchill specification package (993-31-003) that covers this direct expense. Is the contractor expected to make the assumption that this direct expense should be covered under a NAVSEA Standard item (Possibly 009-06) ? If so, where should the direct expense for this be included in the pricing of the solicitation ? | Experience has demonstrated that installing temporary deck covering for high use common traffic areas exceeded the value and did not serve the intended purpose in protecting the decks and only hid the damage incurred. If the Executing Contractor chooses to install temporary deck covering, it will be at the Contractor's expense as it is not directed by the SUPERVISOR. Contractor will be expected to comply with all invoked CAT I and CAT II NAVSEA Standard Items. | ||
| 992-31-001 | Carney Work Package J-1 and Churchill Package J-11 | Specification paragraph 3.1 on Carney indicates that the contractor is expected to identify any tank or space including adjacent tank, space or piping system where the scope of repairs will result in a need for certification during the performance of the job order. This requirement mandates that the contractor make assumptions regarding which specific tanks will require opening, cleaning and gas freeing in the performance of the job order. The Winston Churchill specification package contains a work item 123-10-001 as well as 992-31-001 that cumulatively delineates the spaces and tanks that are to be gas freed in the performance of the job order. |
Is the contractor to estimate that the tanks listed in work item 123-10-001 on the Winston Churchill will require cleaning and gas freeing on the Carney or will it be left up to the contractor to make assumptions?
| The Government will not direct the Contractor to make any assumptions. It is incumbent of the Executing Contractor to review all Work items within the Solicited Work package, to include review of all referenced Drawings to determine which tanks/voids including adjacent tanks/voids that require to be opened, cleaned and gas free. | ||||
| 251-30-001 | J-1 Work Package | Will staging be required to accomplish the requirements of paragraph 3.5 as designated by the Supervisor? | It is incumbent of the Executing Contractor to determine staging requirements for accomplishment of the Work Item in total. | |
| Various | J-1 | PM 390-516 is referenced in various work items in the J-1 work package. By description of this reference the need from a planning aspect is essential. Based on this will the Government provide this reference on an urgent need basis to support the planning efforts of the solicitation? | Reference has been provided via QA1. | |
| J-1 456-90-001 | S/A 84530K Upgrade; Accomplish | Will the Prime or AIT be providing the IAF materials listed on reference 2.4? | Executing Contractor is responsible for providing Installing Activity Furnished (IAF) material that is relevant to the task. | |
| J-1 441-11-001 | Antenna Tilting Group; Repair | Will the contractor be removing and storing the antennas or will the antennas be delivered to the OEM along with the tilting mechanisms ? | Executing Contractor will be responsible for removing and installing the antennas. Storage of the antennas is dependent upon execution of Option Item 441-11-002 Radio Communication Antenna; repair. If the Option Item is not invoked I Level will be taking possession of the Antennas. | |
| J-1 456-90-001 | S/A 84530K Upgrade; Accomplish | Paragraph 3.1.2.1 describes "New Method Mount Equipment Foundation, Attachment and Bracket". Review of Reference 2.4 does not provide details as to what this new method mount involves or if it meets the requirements of Special Note S1. It is unclear if this new method mount requires welding. Can the Government provide granularity as to what the new method mount foundation installation consists of? | Reference 8100-3513-0060_AF Standard Methods for Mounting Elec. Eqpt. Under 75 LBS added to Work Item via Errata 2 for clarification, distributed via Amendment 0002. | |
| J-1 456-90-001 | S/A 84530K Upgrade; Accomplish | Will the AIT be responsible for the materials listed in G/N 7 of reference 2.4 ? | KTR shall provide incidental materials required to support the installation, and removal, of method mount equipment identified, stack studs called out in 3.1.4, materials required for 3.1.5, incidental materials required for 3.1.6 and budget for unknown material as identified 3.20. The AIT will be providing incidental materials for cable installation effort such as cable banding, MCT inserts, blocks, shrink tube, cable tags, etc for Cable removal/installation. | |
| J-1 456-90-001 | S/A 84530K Upgrade; Accomplish | What specific welding/brazing will be required by the Prime Contractor as identified in G/N 24 of reference 2.4 ? | For the removal and installation of method mounted equipment foundations or brackets, identified in Ref 2.4. On 2.4 sheets 8, and 21, equipment to be removed includes a printer, TERM BOX C-2EL-29, and Tempest Filter that may required “hot work” to remove. These items are not shown on Ref 2.2 for rip-out. New method mount equipment foundation/ bracket, or stack studs will be required for mounting items 104 and 105 of Ref 2.4 sheet 14. | |
| J-1 456-90-001 | S/A 84530K Upgrade; Accomplish | Will foundation surfaces exposed by removal/installation of equipment require preservation prior to new installations based on G/N 25 of reference 2.4 ? | New equipment Ref 2.4 item 101 an 102 (OJ-839s) are mounted in existing racks in CSER 1 and CSER 3, and do not require foundation preservation. New foundation for the printer requirement addressed in Ref 2.2. Foundation removals and deck preservation addressed in Ref 2.2. | |
| J-1 456-90-001 | S/A 84530K Upgrade; Accomplish | Will the AIT be responsible for accomplishing Test Notes T-1 and T-2 of reference 2.4 ? | Yes, AIT is responsible for accomplishment of Test Notes T-1 and T-2 as it applies for AIT installed cables. | |
| 922-31-001 | Cleaning and Pumping; accomplish | Please provide a list of tank and adjacent tanks needing cleaning and pumping. The package does not contain a 123-10-001 Item. The subject work item has spaces listed in paragraph 1.2, but attachment A contains the "PCN" ID numbers indicating numerous tanks needing cleaning & pumping to accomplish repairs. | It is incumbent of the Executing Contractor to review all Work items within the Solicited Work package, to include review of all referenced Drawings to determine which tanks require to be opened, cleaned and gas free, this also includes adjacent tanks. Contractor to refer to para 3.1 of 992-31-001 Cleaning and Pumping; accomplish, “Open, ventilate, empty, clean, render dry, and maintain any tank or space including adjacent tank, space, or piping system where the scope of repairs will result in a need for certification during the performance of this Job Order.” | |
| 121-11-001 | Below Waterline Assessment (BWLA) Structural Discrepancy Repair; accomplish | Please provide reference 2.2, PM 309-514. | Reference has been provided via QA1. | |
| 167-11-001 | Bolted Equipment Removal Plate (BERP) Repair; accomplish | Paragraph 3.5 calls out 009-32 Table 2, Line 17, Column A, B and G for the exterior of the BERPs. Column A, B and C reads to surface prep, then coat with proprietary prime and stripe coat for wet non-skid which is Column E; Column G is blank. Paragraph 3.5.1 is 009-26 Attachment G, Peel and Stick. Will the Government consider clarifying paragraphs 3.5 and 3.5.1? Contractor recommends changing to Table 2, Line 18. Please advise. | SUPERVISOR concurs that Column G is incorrect. Errata 2 generated to modify para 3.5 to read Table 2, Line 18 for each exterior of each BERP listed in 1.3. | |
| 512-90-001 | ShipAlt DDG51-77419K, Textile Duct Installation; accomplish | Paragraph 3.1 and 3.1.1.1 - is the hazard PCBs or heavy metals, or both? Is the hazard located in the felts, ducting or both? | Para 3.1 is invoked as precautionary notes for the Executing Contractor. Para 3.1.1 is invoked to verify equipment identified contains or does not contain a hazardous substance. | |
| 512-90-002 | ShipAlt DDG51-791785K, Textile Duct for Combat Information Center (CIC) Installation; accomplish | Paragraph 3.1 and 3.1.1.1 - is the hazard PCBs or heavy metals, or both? Is the hazard located in the felts, ducting or both? | Para 3.1 is invoked as precautionary notes for the Executing Contractor. Para 3.1.1 is invoked to verify equipment identified contains or does not contain a hazardous substance. | |
| 512-90-003 | ShipAlt DDG51-91786K, Textile Duct for Combat Systems (CS) Conjoining Spaces Installation; accomplish | Paragraph 3.1 and 3.1.1.1 - is the hazard PCBs or heavy metals, or both? Is the hazard located in the felts, ducting or both? | Para 3.1 is invoked as precautionary notes for the Executing Contractor. Para 3.1.1 is invoked to verify equipment identified contains or does not contain a hazardous substance. | |
| J-1 456-90-001 | S/A 84530K Upgrade; Accomplish | The contractor can estimate new and disturbed insulation and lagging expected to require replacement in support of the work being performed by the Contractor. Any insulation that could be disturbed by the AIT cannot be reasonably estimated. Should the contractor estimate the insulation and lagging expected to be disturbed by the contractors work only ? | The amount of disturbed insulation and lagging by the AIT performing cable removal, and installations will be minimal. The labor and material identified in para 3.20 will be sufficient to cover scope of work to support insulation and lagging repairs disturbed by the AIT. | |
| J-1 541-90-001 | S/A 70403K Installation; Accomplish | Specification paragraph 3.1 states for the contractor to accomplish the requirements of 2.2 through 2.4. Notes in paragraphs 4.1 through 4.4 conflict with the specification requirements as its states Government AIT will perform portions of said work. Will the Government clearly delineate the specific work that will be performed by the contractor and the Government AIT? | Work Item as written is a Split Scope Work Item. Requirements are delineated in paras 3.1 through 3.9 which are the Executing Contractors tasking. The notes in para 4 describe the interface between the Contractors tasking and what the AIT will be accomplishing. | |
| J-1 438-90-001 | S/A 71604K; Accomplish | Specification paragraph 3.1 states for the contractor to accomplish the requirements of 2.2 through 2.10. Notes in paragraphs 4.1 through 4.5 conflict with the specification requirements as its states Government AIT will perform portions of said work. Will the Government clearly delineate the specific work that will be performed by the contractor and the Government AIT? | Work Item as written is a Split Scope Work Item. Requirements are delineated in paras 3.1 through 3.10 which are the Executing Contractors tasking. The notes in para 4 describe the interface between the Contractors tasking and what the AIT will be accomplishing. | |
| J-1 438-90-002 | S/A 71726K; Accomplish | Specification paragraph 3.1 states for the contractor to accomplish the requirements of 2.2 through 2.5. Notes in paragraphs 4.1 through 4.5 conflict with the specification requirements as its states Government AIT will perform portions of said work. Will the Government clearly delineate the specific work that will be performed by the contractor and the Government AIT? | Work Item as written is a Split Scope Work Item. Requirements are delineated in paras 3.1 through 3.8 which are the Executing Contractors tasking. The notes in para 4 describe the interface between the Contractors tasking and what the AIT will be accomplishing. | |
| J-1 456-90-001 | S/A 84530K Upgrade; Accomplish | Will the AIT be performing the daily competent person inspections including the OSHSA 74 Log after the initial Marine Chemist Certificate is obtained in paragraph 3.17 ? | Yes | |
| 520-11-001 | Sea Valve and Waster Sleeve; repair and replace | Please provide reference 2.2, PM 390-510 Rev A, SERMC, USS Carney (DDG 64) Sea Valve List. | Reference provided in QA1. | |
| 562-11-001 | Rudder; inspect and repair | Please provide reference 2.3, DM 230-0076, SURF, Rudder Structural Welding Testing. | Reference provided in response to BQ answered in QA1, with corresponding reference. | |
| 581-11-002 | Anchor Chain Compressor Actuating Cylinder; repair | Please provide reference 2.2, 6220300 Rev AA, DDG51 Class Fabrication of Anchor Handling. | Reference provided on original disk that was distributed. | |
| 624-10-001 | Vault Door; replace | Please provide reference 2.2, 600-6764587 Rev B, Shipalt DDG-51-00218K Temp Surf Crypto Sys Instl (TSCSI) Furnishings Arr & Ml and reference 2.3, 804-5184141 Rev A, Door, Vault Type for Special Intelligence Spaces. | Reference 2.2 and 2.3 provided in response to BQs answered in QA1, with references provided in QA1 for distribution. | |
| 992-11-001 | Regional Maintenance Center (RMC) Office Space; provide | Attachment A is referenced in paragraphs 3.1.3, 3.1.3.1 and 3.1.18 but is not listed in paragraph 2. Will Attachment A be provided and added to paragraph 2? | Attachment A is imbedded in the Work Item within NMD. Provided via QA1 for distribution. | |
| J-1 651-90-001 | S/A 71605K; Accomplish | Dwg Reference 2.3 is misidentified in the specification. Reference 2.3 is actually DDGM Advanced Galley Fab Details of Commisary Equipment & ML. Material contained on the BOM in reference 2.3 identifies material as GFM. There are GFM Assemblies identified on the BOM in references 2.4 and 2.5 as well. The BOM assemblies "A" include the sub-components that comprise the assemblies on the BOM's. Will the Assemblies "A" be received as GFM in an assembled, welded and RFI status ? | Supervisor concurs in regards to Reference 2.3. Errata 3 generated to correct Reference 2.3. The Contractor will be provided all GFM/HSC material required for proper installation in accordance with the applicable references. Contractor is responsible for providing IAF material and incidental material per General Notes. Errata 3 provided via Amendment 0002. | |
| J-1 651-90-001 | S/A 71605K; Accomplish | Reference 2.9 identifies numerous components as "HSC" Hardware Supply Command. Are the materials listed as "HSC" in the BOM to be considered GFM or IAF for the purposes of estimating the expense of these components ? | Items listed as "HSC" will be supplied as GFM. | |
| J-1, 631-31-001 | Underwater Hull; Preserve | Paragraph 3.4 (Capasic) and paragraph 3.5 (shafting) are repeats of items 633-11-001, 3.3 (3.4) and 243-12-001, 3.24 (3.5). Please clarify | Upon review, it was determined the same requirements were written in multiple work items. Errata 3 written on 631-31-001 (Underwater Hull) to remove paragraph 3.5 for preservation of shafting and 633-11-001 (Cathodic Protection) to delete paragraphs 3.3 and 3.10 for preservation of the ICCP. Errata 3 distributed via Amendment 0002. | |
| 857-11-001 |
992-11-007 Personnel Berthing Barge Support; provide
| Berthing Barge Tow; provide (OPTION ITEM) | Both work item 857-11-001 and 992-11-007 require the Contractor to tow a living barge from Mayport. Is it the intent for the Contractor to bid both items? | Work Item 857-11-001 is written based upon a contract award within the Ship's homeport area. Work Item 992-11-007 is designated as an OPTION ITEM, written with the intent of being invoked if the contract award is outside the Ship's homeport area. | |||
| J-1 992-11-001 | Regional Maintenance Center (RMC) Office Space; provide | Paragraph 3.1.3 directs to utilize Attachment A for criteria. There is no attachment A, please provide. | Attachment A was provided via QA1. | ||
| J-1 992-11-001 | Regional Maintenance Center (RMC) Office Space; provide | Specification directs contractor to provide a RMC office facility from 14 calendar days prior to the contract performance period to 30 days after the contract performance period. Does government wants the office space while the ship is in NS Mayport government facility, regardless of SERMC home office on base? Please confirm or amend specification as needed. | Errata 3 generated to clarify the intent of the work item is to provide office space within Contractor's Plant. Errata 3 distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 992-90-001 | Government Sponsored Representative Office Space; provide | Specification location states contractors facility however, requirement of 3.1 states to make office trailer or office space available from 14 days prior to availability start date to 14 days after completion. Is the government desire to have contractor provide office trailer/ space at the government facility as well? Please clarify. | The work item states that the location (1.2.1) is at Contractor's Facility. If the Contract is Awarded in Mayport, Contractor will be responsible for providing Government Office Trailer/Space at the Governments facility/pier, for the Pierside portion of the Avail. | ||
| J-1 and J-11 | Various Specifications | Ship Alteration Material Summary 4720 is a reference in numerous work items contained in both the J-1 and J-11 work packages. Will the Government please provide the 4720 for each work package ? | 4720 has been provided via QA1. | ||
| J-1 113-11-001 | Para 2.5 529-6218476 Rev H | The reference provided is Rev H however Rev K is High Rev in NSEDR and is called out in item 520-11-001. Will the Government please revise the spec in concurrence with 520-11-001 Revision K ? | Government concurs, ref 2.5 is 529-6218476 Rev K, reference corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 121-11-001 | Para 2.20 100-3218936 Rev Y | Should the reference be 100-6218936 Rev Y vice 100-3218936 Rev Y ? | Government concurs, ref 2.20 is 100-6218936 Rev Y, reference corrected via Errata 2, reference distributed via QA1. | ||
| J-1 121-11-001 | Para 2.28 185-6218861 Rev M | Reference provided is 187-62188661 Rev M vice 185-6218861 Rev M . Please clarify reference # & if in concurrence with SWBS 187 will the Government revise the spec? | Government concurs, ref 2.28 is 187-6218861 Rev M, reference corrected via Errata 2, reference distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 165-11-004 | Para 2.4 S9086-UF-STM-010 Rev 3 | TDMIS shows Hi Rev is Rev 4 - specs 167-11-002 & 167-80-001 call out Null Rev. Will the Government please clarify and revise specs noting either the Hi Rev 4 or remove the revision from this spec? | Per NAVSEA Standard Item 009-01, para 3.6, Contractor must use the highest revision provided in TDMIS unless otherwise specified, work item modified to remove revision number via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 167-11-002 | Para 2.7 S9086-UF-STM-010 | No Revision called in 167-11-002 or 167-80-001 however Rev 3 is called out in 165-11-004 which is one revision out of date - Rev 4 is Hi Rev in TDMIS. Will the Government please clarify and revise the specs noting either Rev 4 or remove Rev 3 from 165-11-004 | Per NAVSEA Standard Item 009-01, para 3.6, Contractor must use the highest revision provided in TDMIS unless otherwise specified, associated work items modified to remove revision number via Errata 2, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 167-11-003 | Para 2.5 167-7024484 | Reference provided is 167-7027484 Rev N "Hatch & Scuttle List". 167-7024484 has not been provided. Will the Government please provide the reference called out in the spec? | Government concurs, ref 2.5 should be 167-7027484 Rev N, reference has been corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 167-80-001 | Para 2.8 S9086-UF-STM-010 | No revision noted, as in 167-11-002, however 165-11-004 calls Rev 3. Will the Government please clarify & revise specs accordingly? | Per NAVSEA Standard Item 009-01, para 3.6, Contractor must use the highest revision provided in TDMIS unless otherwise specified, associated work items modified to remove revision number via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 168-11-001 | Para 2.10 150-6218845 Rev P | The reference provided is 150-6218845 Rev P which is titled " Scantling Arrgmt Drawing Superstructure". Will the Government please clarify and or revise the spec accordingly? | Reference 2.10 is Scantling Arrangement Drawing Superstructure, DWG title corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 245-11-001 | Para 2.10 115654091 Rev K | Revision K was provided. W1ll the Government please clarify correct revision and if Rev K revise the specification. | Reference 2.10 is Rev K, revision corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 251-31-001 | Para 2.4 PM-240-028 SURF | Rev A was provided. Will the Government please clarify & if Rev A is valid revise the spec to reflect? | Reference 2.4 is Rev A, revision corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 259-10-002 | Para 2.4 150-6218962 Rev AA | 150-6218962 called out in Para 2.6 & is correct for Para 2.6. Believe Para 2.4 should be 150-6218963 RE: Unit 4320. Will the Government please clarify and revise spec if in concurrence? | Government concurs, Ref 2.4 corrected to 150-6218963 Rev AA via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 311-31-001 | Para 2.6 S9311-CQ-MMO-A50 Rev 1 | This TM# does not show as being valid in TDMIS but does show in TDMIS as S9311-CQ-MMA-050 vice MMO-050. Will the Government please clarify and correct the spec if in concurrence. | SUPERVISOR concurs, Ref 2.6 corrected to S9311-CQ-MMA-050 via Errata 3, revisions for Tech Manuals Removed. Errata 3 distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 512-90-001 | Para 2.4 51221-3-121 Rev A/4 | Reference not provided. Will the Government please provide the reference? | Reference provided in QA1. | ||
| J-1 520-11-001 | Para 2.13 S6435-QJ-MMI-010 Rev 5 | Reference not provided. The Hi Rev in TDMIS shows Rev 6. Please clarify Revision and if in concurrence with Rev 6 will the Government revise spec? | Per NAVSEA Standard Item 009-01, para 3.6, Contractor must use the highest revision provided in TDMIS unless otherwise specified, associated work items modified to remove revision number via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 520-11-001 | Para 2.21 803-2177917 Rev H | Rev H was provided but Hi Rev in NSEDR is Rev M. Please clarify revision & if in concurrence with Rev M will the Government revise the spec? | Government concurs. Reference 2.21 corrected via Errata 3, reference and errata distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 571-41-001 | Para 2.9 803-6983511 Rev B | Rev C was provided & Rev C is Hi Rev in NSEDR. Please clarify & if in concurrence with Rev C will the Government revise the spec? | Correction made via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 581-11-001 | Para 2.10 581-9220300 Rev Y | Rev AA provided, Rev AA is Hi Rev in NSEDR and Rev AA also called out in 581-11-002. If in concurrence will the Government revise the spec? | Reference 2.10 is 6220300 , not 9220300. Correction made to Reference 2.10 via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 602-11-001 | Para 2.2 602-6219428 Rev B | The correct revision of the reference # is believed to be 602-6219428 Rev T. It appears that the "size B" was taken off of the 1st page of the drawing rather than the "revision" which is Rev B. Will the Government please revise the spec to read 2.2 603-6219428 Rev T ? | Government concurs. Corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 612-21-001 | Para 2.4 61221-2-001 Rev A/3 | Test Procedure Rev B was provided. Please clarify and if in concurrence with Rev B will the Government revise the spec? | Government concurs. Corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 631-41-002 | Para 2.2 155-6218895 Rev M | Reference provided is 165-6218895 Rev M. It is believed that the SWBS in 2.2 reference may be a typo as the reference in called out in multiple specs.. Will the Government please correct the spec? | Government concurs. Corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 633-11-001 | Para 2.10 180-6221298 Rev N | Reference provided is 180-6221298 Rev AD. Please clarify & if in concurrence with Rev AD will the Government revise the spec? | Government concurs. Corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 634-11-001 | Para 2.3 600.6219308 Rev R & 2.4 600-6597107 Rev P | Neither drawing titles match the spec. Will the Government please clarify & provide corrected spec? | Reference 600-6219308 is Paragraph 2.2, not 2.3, and the title is correct. Paragraph 2.4 is actually 600-6597104. Supervisor concurs. Corrected via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 643-90-001 | Para 2.5 RLAR-86820/DDG65/1165700 | Probable typo as RLAR provided is 86820/DDG56/1165700 vice DDG65. Will the Government please clarify & if in concurrence revise the spec? | Correction made via Errata 1, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 651-90-001 | Para 2.3 651-8808714 Rev A | The drawing Title doesn't match the description in 2.3 & it appears that the "description/title" for 2.3 is the same as in 2.8 . Will the Government please clarify and correct the spec? | Correction made via Errata 1, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 655-11-001 | Para 2.8 101.6218646 Rev R | Rev U provided but spec calls Rev R. Will the Government please clarify and if in concurrence with Hi Rev U revise the spec? | Correction made via Errata 1, distributed via Amendment 0002. | ||
| J-1 993-31-001 | Para 2.2 S9510-AT-MMA-010 Rev 3 | The spec calls Rev 3 but TDMIS shows Rev 4 as Hi rev. Will the Government please clarify & if in concurrence of Rev 4 revise spec? | Per NAVSEA Standard Item 009-01, para 3.6, Contractor must use the highest revision provided in TDMIS unless otherwise specified, associated work items modified to remove revision number via Errata 3, distributed via Amendment 0002. |
&P of &N
DDG81 Q&A 2
| USS WINSTON CHURCHILL (DDG 81) DMP Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Questions | ||||
| Drawing | ||||
| GFM | Solicitation #: | N00024-19-R-4468 | Phone | |
| RLAR | TPPC | Justin Lessel, Contract Specialist, justin.d.lessel@navy.mil | 202-781-4064 | |
| Erica Fetter, Contracting Officer, erica.fetter@navy.mil | 202-781-3421 | |||
| The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation. | ||||
| To request references, drawings, RLARs, and Erratas being provided under this Solicitation Question & Answer Set, |
please contact the NAVSEA POCs.
| Work Item No. | Document Number/Title | Question | Government Response | ||
| 115-90-001 | SA 82746K Stanchion Cracking Fnd | Ref. 2.3, RLAR was no provided. Please provide missing reference. | Reference provided via Amendment 0002. | ||
| 643-11-001 | Berthing Hab (BCPO-S0093) | No drawings were provided on the CD. Please provide missing references | Reference provided via QA1. | ||
| 643-11-002 | Officer Berthing Hab (BOFF-S9793) | No drawings were provided on the CD. Please provide missing references | Reference provided via QA1. | ||
| 644-11-001 | Sanitary Hab Mod (HCPO-S0127) | Ref. 2.3 and 2.5 were not provided on the CD. Please provide missing References | Reference provided via QA1. | ||
| 644-11-002 | Officer Sanitary Mod (HOFF- S9794) | No drawings were provided on the CD. Please provide missing references | Reference provided via QA1. | ||
| 115-90-001 | ShipAlt DDG51-82746K, Stanchion Cracking Foundation; | ||||
| accomplish | Please provide RLAR 82746/DDG51/1184872, Piece 302 (Rivnut) Unprocurable | Reference provided via Amendment 0002. | |||
| 644-11-001 | Sanitary Habitability Modification Project (HCPO-S0127) Installation; accomplish | Please provide 644-8383437 Rev E, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement CPO & Crew Sanitary Spaces Modifications. Provided Revision "D" | Reference provided via QA1. | ||
| 644-11-001 | Sanitary Habitability Modification Project (HCPO-S0127) Installation; accomplish | Please provide 512-8383438 Rev E, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Ventilation CPO & Crew Sanitary Spaces Modifications | Reference provided via QA1. | ||
| 644-11-001 | Sanitary Habitability Modification Project (HCPO-S0127) Installation; accomplish | Please provide 505-8383439 Rev E, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Piping CPO & Crew Sanitary Spaces Modifications. Provided Revision "D" | Reference provided via QA1. | ||
| 644-11-001 | Sanitary Habitability Modification Project (HCPO-S0127) Installation; accomplish | Please provide 331-8383440 Rev E, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Electrical CPO & Crew Sanitary Spaces Modifications | Reference provided via QA1. | ||
| 644-11-002 | Officer Sanitary Habitability Modification Project (HOFFS9794) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide 644-8829719 Rev A, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement Officers Sanitary Space Modifications | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 644-11-002 | Officer Sanitary Habitability Modification Project (HOFFS9794) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide 512-8829720 Rev A, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Ventilation Officers Sanitary Space Modifications | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 644-11-002 | Officer Sanitary Habitability Modification Project (HOFFS9794) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide 505-8829721 Rev A, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Piping Officers Sanitary Space Modifications | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 644-11-002 | Officer Sanitary Habitability Modification Project (HOFFS9794) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide 331-8829722 Rev A, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Electrical Officers Sanitary Space Modifications | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 259-10-001 | NO 2 Gas Turbine Mixing Room, Uptake & Boundary Layer Infra-Red Suppression Sys ( BLISS) | Paragraph 3.2.1 requires ‘Accomplish a visual inspection of each location listed in 1.2.1 through 1.2.7, using 2.3 through 2.17 for guidance’; and paragraph 3.2.1.1 says ‘Inspection of each location listed in 1.2.2 and 1.2.3 must include the exterior surface of each exhaust duct, trunk and BLISS Cap including each uptake duct anchor foundation and structural member for structural integrity, deterioration, pitting, cracks and areas of distortion’. |
There is no paragraph stating to remove or replace all the insulation in way of the visual inspection.
The following paragraphs outline specific insulation requirements for these work items:
• 3.4.8 Remove a total of 100 square feet of bulkhead insulation.
• 3.4.9 Remove a total of 50 square feet of lagging pad.
• 3.4.10 Remove a total of 50 square feet of vent duct insulation.
• 3.4.11 Remove a total of 100 square feet of perforated sheathing insulation.
• 3.4.12 Remove existing and install new a total of 8 metal bands.
Paragraphs 3.5; 3.5.1 and 3.5.3 covers the re-insulation of the specific areas of removals called for in the work items.
Is it the governments intent to remove all the insulation for the visual inspection outlined in paragraphs 3.2.1 and 3.2.1.1 throughout spaces listed in 1.2? If so, shouldn’t there be a paragraph stating to remove all the insulation and a paragraph to reinstall all the insulation new to accomplish 009-11?
| ERRATA 1 of this Work Item 259-10-001 addresses this question. See Para 3.6 which directs KTR accomplish 009-11 and to re-install the material that was removed. Errata distributed via Amendment 0002. | |||
| 259-10-002 | NO 1 Gas Turbine Mixing Room, Uptake & Boundary Layer Infra-Red Suppression Sys ( BLISS) | Paragraph 3.2.1 requires ‘Accomplish a visual inspection of each location listed in 1.2.1 through 1.2.7, using 2.3 through 2.17 for guidance’; and paragraph 3.2.1.1 says ‘Inspection of each location listed in 1.2.2 and 1.2.3 must include the exterior surface of each exhaust duct, trunk and BLISS Cap including each uptake duct anchor foundation and structural member for structural integrity, deterioration, pitting, cracks and areas of distortion’. |
There is no paragraph stating to remove or replace all the insulation in way of the visual inspection.
The following paragraphs outline specific insulation requirements for these work items:
• 3.4.8 Remove a total of 100 square feet of bulkhead insulation.
• 3.4.9 Remove a total of 50 square feet of lagging pad.
• 3.4.10 Remove a total of 50 square feet of vent duct insulation.
• 3.4.11 Remove a total of 100 square feet of perforated sheathing insulation.
• 3.4.12 Remove existing and install new a total of 8 metal bands.
Paragraphs 3.5; 3.5.1 and 3.5.3 covers the re-insulation of the specific areas of removals called for in the work items.
Is it the governments intent to remove all the insulation for the visual inspection outlined in paragraphs 3.2.1 and 3.2.1.1 throughout spaces listed in 1.2? If so, shouldn’t there be a paragraph stating to remove all the insulation and a paragraph to reinstall all the insulation new to accomplish 009-11?
| ERRATA 1 of this Work Item 259-10-002 addresses this question. See Para 3.8 which directs KTR accomplish 009-11 and to re-install the material that was removed. Errata distributed via Amendment 0002. | |||||
| 505-11-001 | Flexible Hose Assembly; replace | Please provide S6430-AE-TED-010 Rev. 6, Piping Devices and Flexible Hose Assemblies. | Reference provided via Amendment 0002. | ||
| 643-11-001 | Berthing Habitability Modification Project (BCPO-S0093) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide reference 640-8383433 Rev. E, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement CPO & Crew Living Spaces Modifications. | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 643-11-001 | Berthing Habitability Modification Project (BCPO-S0093) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide reference 512-8383434 Rev. E, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement CPO & Crew Living Spaces Modifications. | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 643-11-001 | Berthing Habitability Modification Project (BCPO-S0093) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide reference 331-8383436 Rev. E, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement CPO & Crew Living Spaces Modifications. | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 643-11-002 | Officer Berthing Habitability Modification Project (BOFFS9793) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide reference 640-8829715 Rev. A, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement CPO & Crew Living Spaces Modifications. | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 643-11-002 | Officer Berthing Habitability Modification Project (BOFFS9793) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide reference 512-8829716 Rev. A, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement CPO & Crew Living Spaces Modifications. | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 643-11-002 | Officer Berthing Habitability Modification Project (BOFFS9793) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide reference 505-8829717 Rev. A, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement CPO & Crew Living Spaces Modifications. | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| 643-11-002 | Officer Berthing Habitability Modification Project (BOFFS9793) | ||||
| Installation; accomplish | Please provide reference331-8829718 Rev. A, Habitability Improvement (DDG 81) Arrangement CPO & Crew Living Spaces Modifications. | Reference provided via QA1. | |||
| Solicitation | Section C, 2 – Location. 2.1 Place of Performance | Please confirm that the Prime Awardee can, at its discretion and with Navy approval, accomplish either availability identified in this solicitation in the ship’s homeport if the Prime Awardee has secured adequate pier space, drydock space, and other necessary resources to perform the contractual workscope identified in the solicitation in the ship’s homeport. Please also confirm that the Navy will not unreasonably withhold such permission if requested by the Prime Awardee. | The Offeror may, at their discretion, propose to complete the USS CARNEY and USS WINSTON CHURCHILL in different places of performance. | ||
| Inter-port Differential (IPD), Page 237 of 255 | TITLE: WINSTON S CHURCHILL Training Report Shortfalls | Were the requirements in Surface Force Readiness Manual (COMNAVSURPACINST/COMNAVSURFLANTINST 3502.3) taken into consideration in the training of the crew and the TADTAR requirements to meet Team Training requirements and Crew Certification requirements in the Interport Differential Costs? Recent Training Reports for WINSTON S CHURCHILL as the ship prepares for deployment indicate that the ship will require a plethora of Team Trainers and schools for required NEC Shortfalls. These schools are only taught in the Fleet Concentration Areas (FCA) during the DMP Period of Performance. Is the TADTAR resources that are required to support the TRAREP shortfalls and school requirements for Crew Certification included in the Interport Differential (IPD) evaluated table? Please review the WINSTON S CHURCHILL's TRAREP for their shortfall and what will be required during the DMP Period of Performance against the COMNAVSURFPAC/COMSURFLANTINST 3502.3 Surface Force Readiness Manual requirements. | Yes, the requirements in Surface Force Readiness Manual (COMNAVSURPACINST/COMNAVSURFLANTINST 3502.3) were taken into consideration | ||
| Inter-port Differential (IPD), Page 237 of 255 | TITLE: Assessment Visits from ISIC / ATG / CNRMC / CNSL costs in the IPD | Each Ship in the bundle goes through a myriad of Assessments and Inspections during their Operational Cycle that are conducted by personnel in the Fleet Concentration Area. Are these assessments going to take place during the CNO Availability IAW with the Surface Force Readiness Manual and are the costs (perdiem, travel, etc) incorporated in the Inter-port Differential (IPD) Costs? |
• Afloat Training Group (ATG) Training and Assessments (Light Off Exam, Combat Systems Light off, NGFS Team Trainer, On-Board Aviation Fire Fighting Team Trainer, etc.)
• Aviation Certification (AVCERT) Team
• TYCOM and ISIC Crew Certification Team
• Total Ship Readiness Assessment (TSRA) Team
• Shipboard Corrosion Assessment Team (S-CAT)
• Shipboard Readiness Engineering Training & Support Teams (ERAT)
| • Combat Systems Readiness Assessment Team (CSRAT) | Yes, the assessment and certification requirements were taken into consideration | ||||
| 438-90-001 | ShipAlt DDG51-88260K, Enterprise Remote Monitor Hardware Installation; accomplish | Will cables and accessories be included in the GFM kitted material? | Cables and accessories will not be included in the GFM Kitted Material; only the eRM rack will be included in the kit. KTR will be responsible for providing cables and accessories. |
&P of &N image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .