Attachment_S-7_Proposal_Assessment.xlsx

Section L & M Requirements

Text: 12-point Times New Roman font.

Graphics pages text: Not smaller than 10-point font, legible, and readable.

* For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although material is proposed), provided an explanation as to why.

at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/contracting-officials/goaling.

a) Identifies the specific pier(s) and dock(s) intended to be used for each proposed Availability, and

b) Indicates that those pier(s) and dock(s) meet the minimum characteristics of Table 1 on Attachment S-5.

(2) Provide a signed letter identifying and confirming ownership of a pier capable of berthing and a dry dock capable of docking the vessel(s) during the applicable period(s) in accordance with the applicable Execution Milestones & Key Events attachment. The representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. If the offeror is utilizing a subcontractor for physical resources (pier or dry-dock), a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access to proposed pier(s) & dry-docks(s) is required. The subcontractor representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company.

(3) Provide a copy of the offeror's current Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA), MSRA number, or proof of MSRA equivalency that meets the requirement of CNRMC instruction 4280 series. To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection. All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1300, local time, Washington DC on 14 July 2019. Requests shall be sent to Martha Bello at martha.bello@navy.mil and Justin Lessel at justin.d.lessel@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility. 1. Assess whether, upon receipt of proposals, the offeror holds, or has applied for and will hold by time of award, a Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA) or MSRA Equivalency through NAVSEA 02

2. Assess whether the offeror has ownership or committed access to a pier capable of berthing the vessel, and has ownership or committed access to a dry-dock capable of docking the vessel, in accordance with Section L.

(a) That supports the extent to which the offeror has provided the planned manpower resources, both prime and subcontractor, necessary to complete their current projects. As part of their narrative, offerors shall provide:

(i) A root cause analysis of any manpower resource shortfalls (defined as actual manpower resources less than planned manpower resources)

(ii) An explanation of the mitigations implemented and planned to resolve those shortfalls

(iii) An explanation of how the offeror will provide the proposed manpower resources to complete each availability, accounting for the offeror’s current manpower resourcing performance, as shown in the Offeror’s current Progress/Manning data

(b) Corresponding to the curves (total) and (trade), provided in response to Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower, paragraphs (3) and (4), outline how the Offeror will achieve proposed manning levels via overtime, additional hiring actions, or the utilization of subcontractors (if applicable). Outline the state of the offeror’s current workforce (Factor 2, Sub-factor A, paragraph (2)) in relationship to the proposed Availability, and ensure the following areas are addressed:

(i) Should the offeror propose to utilize overtime for the proposed availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the overtime associated with the proposed Availability.

(ii) Should the offeror propose to hire additional personnel for the proposed Availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the additional personnel associated with the proposed Availability.

(iii) Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources for the proposed Availability, the offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and period of performance for each subcontract requirement. The offeror shall include in its narrative a plan to manage the subcontractor manning levels included in the proposed Availability. 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

a) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s narrative demonstrates a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the offeror will provide the manpower resources to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements as proposed, accounting for the offeror’s current manpower resourcing performance. In addition, assess the extent to which the offeror’s narrative regarding utilization of overtime, hiring additional personnel and utilization of subcontractors is supported by current manning performance and narrative.

(2) Provide current Progress/Manning Reports demonstrating the extent to which the Offeror is providing planned prime and subcontractor manpower resources necessary to complete current ship repair and construction projects. These reports should follow the format requested in the NSO 009-60.

(a) Provide all current Progress/Manning Reports in the form of CDRLs or equivalent data reports provided to your customer for current ship repair and construction projects.

“Current” is defined as a project in-progress or completed within the last three (3) months as of the date of the initial proposal due date for this procurement.

(b) Provide a completed solicitation Section J, Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4). 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

b) Assess the extent to which the Offeror's completed Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet (Attachment S-4) and associated CDRLs or equivalent reports correlate with the narrative in Factor 2, Subfactor A (1).

(3) The Offeror shall provide three (3) Manpower Curves (Total) in accordance with NSI 009-60 which graphically delineate the resources tied to each individual ship availability in men-per-day. All curves provided shall represent the full Availability period of performance, total manpower ceiling and shall show correlated manning values across all curves. Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. A curve shall be provided for each of the following and reflect the full Availability period of performance:

(a) The manpower curve (total) associated with the NSI 009-60 Initial IPS for the proposed Availability. This chart shall show the total manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.

(b) The total manpower resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number. This chart shall show the total manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.

(c) The total manpower resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements during the Availability period of performance. All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1), shall be included in this curve. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number. This chart shall show the total manpower resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror. 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

c) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s proposed manpower curves (total) demonstrate a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the offeror will provide the manpower resources to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements and all existing and proposed work. The Government will assess these curves in relation to the narrative provided in Factor 2, Subfactor A (1). Emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated manning shortfalls.

(4) The Offeror shall provide Manpower Curves (Trade) in accordance with NSI 009-60 which graphically delineate the resources tied to each trade in men-per-day. All curves provided shall represent the full Availability period of performance and shall show correlated manning values across all curves. Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. The following trades shall be reflected in each curve: ship fitter, welder, inside machinist, outside machinist, electrician, pipe fitter, sheet metal, painter, carpenter, rigger, labor, other. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Curve(s) shall be provided for each of the following and reflect the full Availability period of performance:

(a) The manpower curve (trade) associated with the NSI 009-60 Initial IPS for the proposed Availability.

(b) The trade manpower resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

(c) The trade manpower resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements during the Availability period of performance. All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1) shall be included in this curve. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

(d) Chart showing the available trade manpower resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror during the Availability period of performance. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

d) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s proposed manpower curves (trade) demonstrate a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the offeror will provide the trade manpower resources to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements and all existing and proposed work. The Government will assess these curves in relation to the narrative provided in Factor 2, Subfactor A (1). Emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated trade manning shortfalls.

(a) The pier and dry-dock required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract based on current contract schedule. Additionally, identify the total pier and dry-dock currently in working capacity, and expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the Availability period of performance.

(b) The pier and dry-dock required to complete all outstanding proposals, per proposed schedules. Identify the pier and dry-dock committed to previously awarded requirements, as well as the proposed use of resources to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals (including this proposal).

(c) The pier and dry-dock required to complete any other anticipated requirements (including but not limited to non-Navy work, pier and dry-dock upgrades or maintenance).

(d) Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted pier or dry-dock, the Offeror shall include an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the prime's facility and the pier and dry-dock that will be provided by the subcontractor.

(e) The Offeror's plan to resolve pier and dry-dock resource conflicts as a result of the award of other outstanding proposals. Pier and dry-dock shall not be committed to multiple ships during the same time period without reasonable explanation.

(f) In the event the Offeror proposes an interval of less than seven (7) days between the undocking date of other requirements and the proposed docking date of this Availability, and/or a proposed docking date within the first seven (7) days of the Availability, then the narrative shall detail the necessary steps to accomplish.

2. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor B, Physical Resource Capacity to:

a) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s narrative and graphical representation demonstrates that the Offeror's capability to provide the required physical resources to complete the Availability. An emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated physical resource conflicts.

Offerors shall integrate all work included in the Work Package. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, the Initial IPS does not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Navy Intermediate-Level schedules.

3. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor C, Integrated Product Schedule for:

a) Understanding of scope and integration of the work items in the Work Item Specification Package (Attachment J-1 and J-11)

b) Identifying the critical path and logically sequencing work items, and

c) Integrating the milestones and key events in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3 and J-13) reasonably.

Assessment of past performance will be a subjective assessment based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. The Government is seeking to determine whether the Offeror has consistently demonstrated on recent and relevant contracts a commitment to customer satisfaction and timely delivery of quality goods and services at fair and reasonable prices.

Offerors shall address unfavorable reports of past performance. Offeror’s responses, or lack thereof, will be taken into consideration. In particular, recent and relevant contracts will be examined to ensure that corrective measures have been put in place to prevent the reoccurrence of past performance problems. Prompt actions taken to correct performance problems will be a reflection of management concern for customer satisfaction; however, such action may not mitigate all negative performance trends.

The Government’s past performance evaluation will focus on the following areas:

• Cost Control

• Schedule

• Technical Performance

• Subcontract Management

• “Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation. If the offeror has not completed up to five (5) contracts within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted.

• “Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation.

o Scope: Experience in the areas defined in the Solicitation as specified in Attachment J-1 and J-11 Specification Package and J-2 and J-12 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References.

o Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.

o Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).

2. The Government will evaluate the recency, relevancy and quality of an Offeror’s past performance to assess a performance confidence rating. The Government will utilize CPARS data (Attachment S-2) where available, and if unavailable, utilize PPQ (Attachment S-9) as provided. The Government reserves the right to evaluate other sources of information. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, an Offeror’s past performance information from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Report System (eSRS), as well as any other sources reasonably available to the Government.

An offeror that does not have recent and relevant past performance to provide for consideration is requested to affirmatively state that it does not have recent and relevant past performance for the Government to consider. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a) (2) (iv), an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. The lack of a performance record will result in a neutral performance risk assessment.