USS_GONZALEZ_(DDG_66)_Questions_and_Answers_2_Final_Version.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00024-16-R-4404
About this file
Questions and Answers Number 2
View the file
Other files
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND
N00024-16-R-4404
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS #2
23 June 2016
The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.
| 18. | In WI 437-90-003 there is no reference to 009-78, but the WI provides a POC for PCMS training and the kited material in 5.3 contains PCMS tile. Will the Government invoke 009-78 to remove tile as interference and install the new PCMS tile? | |
| a. Yes, the Government will invoke 009-78 via ERRATA. | ||
| 19. | WI 167-80-001 appears to use Fiscal Year (FY)-14 WI 009-32 for the application of nonskid based upon the table and lines referenced. Will the Government update WI 009-32 to the FY 16 version? | |
| a. Yes, the Government updated the WI to the FY 16 version via ERRATA number one. | ||
| 20. | WI 150-11-003 requires the contractor to remove protective covering, but does not require the contractor to install protective covering. Is the contractor required to install protective covering? |
a. The contractor is required to install, maintain, and inspect its protective covering in accordance with standard work time 009-06 CAT 1 (invoked without reference).
21. In WI 130-11-002 paragraph 3.1 calls out SSPC-SP-6/NACE 3. Also paragraph 3.6 states to accomplish the requirements of WI 009-32, but there is no preservation paragraph for the areas listed in 1.3.1. Can the Government clarify which coating system will be applied to the SP-6 surface of 1.3.1?
a. Paragraph 3.1 was modified to SSPC-SP3/NACE 3 of 2.2 via ERRATA 1. Paragraph 3.6 was modified in ERRATA 1 to include location in 1.3.1. Table 4 line 10 of 009-32 was utilized for paragraphs 1.3.1 and 1.3.2. The coating system is the same as paragraph 1.3.2.
| 22. | Paragraph 5.3 of WI 313-80-001 states that kitted material is provided and referenced in the 4720, but the 4720 doesn’t show any material being provided. Please provide a list of the GFM. | |
| a. The Government will provide reference 2.8 and update the 4720 via ERRATA. | ||
| 23. | Please confirm paragraph 3.2.6 of WI 437-90-003 should state that the AIT contractor accomplishing the electrical mods shall accomplish hot work operations. |
a. Paragraph 3.2.6 is now 3.2.8 and was changed via ERRATA 1 to state that the AIT contractor accomplishing the electrical mods shall accomplish hot work operations as well.
| 24. | Please provide reference 2.3 for WI 622-80-001 as only one sheet of seven was provided on the CD. | |
| a. A complete version of the reference is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil. | ||
| 25. | Please confirm in WI 631-11-006 that paragraph 3.1 only calls for the dirty side of the fan room to be cleaned. Also, please confirm that filters will be removed by others prior to the contractor’s work. |
a. Only the dirty side of the room needs to be cleaned but the contractor needs to protect the filters per standard work item 009-06 CAT 1. The filters will not be removed. The contractor needs to protect the filters in place.
| 26. | WI 992-21-101 requires the contractor to have a 2000 square foot enclosure pier side and in close proximity to the ship. Can the Government change the WI to read “in close proximity of the ship” in order to allow the contractor to use the pier space for other valuable equipment? | |
| a. Yes, paragraph 3.5 was changed via ERRATA 1. | ||
| 27. | Was the 8” Butterfly Valve (1.3.3) in WI 256-11-001 intentionally left off of the provided material? Will the 8” valve be IAF or GFM? |
a. The 8” Butterfly valve (1.3.3) will be IAF. This change will be made via ERRATA.
28. WI 521-80-001 paragraph 5.3 states that there is kitted material listed on the 4720 for ShipAlt 75829D. The material is not listed on the 4720. Will the material listed as “Source GFM” be provided as GFM?
a. Yes, the material listed will be provided as GFM. This change will be made via ERRATA.
29. WI 123-11-004 paragraph 3.1 states to perform an SP-6 between frames 370-373. Does the Government intend for the contractor to perform an abrasive blast within the #3 generator room? Additionally, will the equipment be in layup and wrapped in plastic or shrink wrapped including all electric and electronic panels or is this the responsibility of the contractor?
a. SP-6 was changed to SP-3 power tool clean via ERRATA number one. Protection of the equipment is the responsibility of the contractor as outlined in WI 009-06 CAT 1.
| 30. | Paragraph 3.2 of WI 992-11-008 requests the contractor to provide pilot and tow boats to move fuel barges. Will the contractor be responsible for providing this as this has not been the case in the past? | |
| a. Paragraph 3.2 will be deleted via ERRATA. | ||
| 31. | WI 245-11-001 asks the contractor to do repair work on blades. Which type of blades need repair? | |
| a. For pricing purposes use standard fleet blades. | ||
| 32. | WI 150-11-023 calls for Unit 4420 but reference 2.4 calls out 4220. Which is the correct number? | |
| a. Paragraph 2.4 will be changed to Unit 4220 via ERRATA. | ||
| 33. | WI 150-11-024 reference 2.8 is listed as 262-8534070 (Electric Plant Installation Standard Methods for Surface Ships and Submarines). However, the drawing provided to the contractor as the number listed above is titled SHIPALT LPD17-84364K Propulsion Lube Oil Sys Mod. Will a new drawing be provided or will the title of reference of 2.8 be changed? | |
| a. Reference 2.8 should be “MIL-STD-2003, Electric Plant Installation Standard Methods for Surfaces Ships and Submarines.” This will be changed via ERRATA. | ||
| 34. | WI 155-11-001 reference 2.2 is 472-7498087 Rev Q but the contractor was provided Rev L. Which version should the contractor be referencing? |
a. ERRATA 3 will change Reference 2.2 to Rev L.
| 35. | WI 167-80-001 reference 2.10 is RLAR 64205/DDG66/1156698 but it was not provided on the CD. Will the Government provide the reference? | |
| a. This reference is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil. | ||
| 36. | WI 243-11-001 reference 2.3 is listed as S9086-HM-STM-010/CH-244 Propulsion Bearings and Seals, but the correct tech manual for that title is S9086-HN-STM-010/CH-244. Does the Government want the contractor to use manual S9086-HN-STM-010/CH-244? |
a. Yes, this will be changed via ERRATA. Note this change also applies to WI 243-12-001 and will also be changed via ERRATA.
37. WI 245-11-001 Reference 2.8 is S9245-AU-TRS-010/07309, Oil Distribution Box Assembly & Pitch Indicator Assembly. The copy of this manual provided to the contractor on CD seems to be incomplete. It starts at 3-39 Figure 3.2 L.P. Seal Ring-Forward. Will the entire tech manual be provided to the contractor?
a. This reference is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil.
| 38. | Reference 2.2 of WI 245-12-003 is listed as S9262-A5-MMA-010 Rev 2, Electric, Flanged, Immersion Type Oil Heaters and Controllers. However, Rev 1 was provided on the CD to the contractor. Will a copy of Rev 2 be made available to the contractor or will reference 2.2 in the spec be revised to show Rev 1? | |
| a. The Government will provide a copy of Rev 2 by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil. | ||
| 39. | WI 259-80-001 Reference 2.2 is 259-6218406 Rev AC, Fab & Instl of GTRB Uptake & Air Intake Eng Rm No. One & Above. However, in other spec items it is Rev “AD” that is referenced. Copies of both Revisions were furnished to the contractor. For the purposes of this bid, are two revisions being used? |
WI 259-80-001 Reference 2.4 is 259-6218424 Rev AD, Fab & Instl of GTRB Uptake & Intakes Eng Rm No. 2 & Above. However in other spec items it is Rev “AE” that is referenced. Copies of both Revisions were furnished to the contractor. For the purposes of this bid, are two revisions being used?
WI 259-80-001 Reference 2.5 is 259-6219487 Rev AC, Fab & Instl of SS GTRB Uptake & Air Intake Generator Rm & Above. However, in other spec items it is Rev “AD” that is referenced. Copies of both Revisions were furnished to the contractor. For the purposes of this bid, are two revisions being used?
a. References 2.2, 2.4, and 2.5 were changed via ERRATA number one to reflect the latest versions.
| 40. | Reference 2.11 of WI 259-80-002 is listed as RLAR 76087/DDG76/1154980, Revise Material Qty for Clips and Pins. However, when the file provided on CD labeled as this RLAR, the file inside is actually RLAR 76087/DDG56/117366 Add Out Conus Sourcing in the General Notes Section of Dwg. Will the correct document be provided to the contractor? | |
| a. The Government will provide the correct reference 2.11 by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil. | ||
| 41. | Reference 2.6 of WI 262-90-001 is listed as 4720-DDG66-FY16-SA76353K, Ship Alteration Material Summary (4720/3). However, there is no such file on the CD provided to the contractor. What looks to be the complete 4720 is a file labeled 4720-DDG66-FY16-SA64204D, but the contractor is unable to locate SA76353K in this document. This 4720 document does include a listing for 76253 (pdf page 118 and 119), but not SA76353K. |
Ref. 2.13 DDGM BF, Critical Path Equipment/Cable Turnover, Power-up & Test Requirement Schedule for SCD 76253, but a copy of this document was not provided on the CD to the contractor. The document on the CD provided that is labeled DDGM BF Critical Path Equipment does not have SCD 76253 listed. Is there another document that covers this reference?
a. Reference 2.6 is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil.. Reference 2.13 is in the original CD provided. The Government recommends saving files directly to a computer if the file is not loading properly from the CD.
42. WI 264-90-001 Reference 2.10 is 4720-DDG66-FY16-SA85973K, Ship Alteration Material Summary (4720/3). However, there is no such file on the CD provided to the contractor. There appears to be a copy of the 4720 in the file labeled 4720-DDG66-FY16-SA64204D, and the contractor is able to find 85973K on page 180 of this document. Will the spec be revised to delete SA85973K off of the 4720-DDG-FY16 since there is no separate document for it?
Ref. 2.13 is DDGM BF, Critical Path Equipment/Cable Turnover, Power-up & Test Requirement Schedule for SCD 85793, but a copy of this document was not provided on CD to the contractor. The document on the CD provided, that is labeled DDGM BF Critical Path Equipment, does not have SCD 85793 listed. Is there another document that covers this reference?
a. Reference 2.10 is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil. The latest version of the 4720 will also be provided via ERRATA. Reference 2.13 is on the CD provided. The Government recommends saving files directly to a computer if the file is not loading properly from the CD.
| 43. | WI 426-80-001 Reference 2.21 is 4720/DDG66/FY16/SA76853, Ship Alteration Material Summary (4720). However, there is no such file on the CD provided to the contractor. What looks to be the complete 4720 is a file labeled 4720-DDG66-FY16-SA64204D, and contractor is able to find 76853K on page 123 of this document. Will the spec be revised to delete SA76853K off of the 4720-DDG-FY16 since there is no separate document for it? | |
| a. The spec will not be revised to delete SA76853K. Reference 2.21 is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil. . | ||
| 44. | Reference 2.25 of WI 438-91-003 is 51221-3-077 Rev A21, HVAC/SGL CCS Wtchstnder Auto Heat Stress Sys Volumetric Balancing Test. However, this reference was not on the CD provided to the contractor. Will this test be made available? Reference 2.27 is 4720-DDG66-FY17-SA71604-A2, Government Furnished Material Summary (4720/3). This reference was not on the CD provided to the contractor. Will this be made available? |
a. References 2.25 and 2.27 are available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil. The title of Reference 2.27 was corrected on ERRATA 2 from FY17 to FY16.
| 45. | WI 633-21-002 paragraph 3.5 requires installation of four new reference electrodes, but there is no reference electrodes listed under paragraph 5.1 GFM. Will the electrodes be GFM or IAF? | |
| a. Reference Electrodes will be IAF. | ||
| 46. | WI 631-11-004 paragraph 3.1.3 states to use 009-32 Table 3, Line 4 which directs to use SIGMAGLAZE 5492. This PPG product has been discontinued and will only be manufactured with an order of 250 gallons or more. This space will only need 20 – 25 gallons maximum. Will the Government change this paragraph to use Table 3, Lines 5, 6 or 7? |
a. Yes, the Government changed the language of the WI in ERRATA number one to use Table 3 Line 5.
47. WI 631-11-003 paragraph 1.2.1.1 identifies frames 370 – 377. However, the space goes from frames 370 – 410. Is it the intent of the Customer to only partially preserve the space? Also, paragraph 3.2 states to accomplish SSPC-SP6/NACE3 in the bilge area located in 1.2. Blasting is not recommended in this space. Will the Government change the spec to power tool these areas instead of blasting them?
a. Paragraph 1.2.1.1 will be modified via ERRATA to read “Bilge, Frames 370-377 and deck area from Frame 377 to 410 (including 6 inches above deck of periphery bulkhead surfaces).” Paragraph 2.3 will be changed via ERRATA to accomplish the requirements of SSPC-SP3 of reference 2.3.
48. WI 438-90-001 Para 3.2.5 states to accomplish the requirements of 009-25 for an air hose test of new and disturbed bulkhead/deck welds, closure patches and cable penetrations. Please confirm that the AIT will accomplish their own 009-25 air hose test for the AIT responsible cable penetrations as they will be accomplishing their own hot work IAW 3.11.
a. Confirmed the AIT is responsible for accomplishing their own 009-25 on work they are responsible for. Paragraph 3.11.1 will be changed via ERRATA.
| 49. | Work Item 980-90-006 is shown in Section B on page 4 of the solicitation as CLIN 0005 and is also shown on the Specification index, but it is not listed on the J-4 workbook and the specification itself was not provided. Please provide this work item or delete it from Section B and the index. | |
| a.WI 980-90-006 will be cancelled via ERRATA. | ||
| 50. | Work Item 980-90-008 is shown on Section B Page 4 as CLIN 0005 and again on page 9 as CLIN 0012. Attachement J-4 , Pricing Workbook, shows the item as CLIN 0012. Please correct either Section B or the Attachment J-4. | |
| a. 980-90-008 is a part of CLIN 0005. Attachment J-4 will be updated via amendment. | ||
| 51. | In WI 468-90-001, the 4720 listed in Ref. 2.11 does not list any GFM, however there is kitted material in Para 5.3. Will the Government provide a list of GFM? | |
| a. Yes, a copy of the 4720 reference 2.11 will be provided via ERRATA. | ||
| 52. | Paragraph 3.7 of WI 980-90-007 states to provide 6 man days of labor. Then subparagraph’s 3.7.1 & 3.7.2 breakdown the elements of the man days, however, they equal 10 man days, vice the 6 man days in 3.7. Will the Government please clarify? |
a. Yes, the Government intends to change paragraph 3.7.1 to 2 man days for welders and change paragraph 3.7.2 to 4 man days of fire watch for a total of 6 man days via ERRATA.
| 53. | Paragraph 3.1 of WI 123-11-005 calls for SP-6 for the repairs in 1.3.1. Will the Government include a table and line from WI 009-32 for preservation of the repairs? | |
| a. Yes, the Government will change this via ERRATA. | ||
| 54. | WI 622-80-001 paragraph 3.1.2.1 does not list a location of 1.2.1 instead of 1.2 and paragraph 3.3 does a location of 1.2.2 instead of 1.2. Can the Government clarify locations? |
a. Yes, paragraph 3.1.2.1 is for the catwalk structure and paragraph 3.3 is for support structure.
55. In WI 262-11-002 paragraph 3.4.5 calls for 009-32, Table 3, Line 11, Column A for Near White Metal Blast of each water box head. Due to the size and cleanliness requirements, will SP-11 be allowed, given that it is an option for surface prep of 009-32 in Table 3, Line 11?
Paragraph 3.4.5.1 states to apply new epoxy coating as designated by the supervisor. What type of epoxy coating will the supervisor designate? Will a Table, Line, and Column of 009-32 be included for a coating system?
a. For paragraph 3.4.5, SP-11 will be allowed. For paragraph 3.4.5.1, contractor shall assume ENECON, and will be revised in an Errata.
56. Is the intent in WI 631-21-001 to have two visual inspections for the mast? Paragraph 3.2 is prior to preservation and paragraph 3.7 is a visual inspection after preservation.
a. Yes, an ERRATA will modify paragraph 3.3 for prior preservation and paragraph 3.12 for post preservation.
57. In WI 463-80-001 reference 2.6 and WI 993-31-004 reference 2.3 is SE000-01-IMB-010, Navy Installation And Maintenance Book (NIMB), Section IX, Installation Standards (SOURCE CD: N0002400003). However, only a welcome page to the book was furnished on the CD received by the contractor. Will this book be furnished to the contractor?
a. Yes, the reference is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil
58. In WI 463-80-001 Reference 2.9 is listed as NAVSEAINST 9460.4F, Sonar Transducer, Hydrophone, and Cable Replacement and Handling Criteria. However, Rev “E” of this document was furnished on the CD provided to the contractor. Will a copy of Rev “F” be made available? Also, reference 2.26 ESR 16-0981 Rev A, Sonar Stuffing Tube FWD/Dry Side Stave Cable and Testing and reference 2.27 GXPS-GI-003, Rev-CH 0, Guide for Utilizing Prototype Handtools for AN/SQS-53C Stave Cable Assembly Pigtail Cable Connectors and TR-343 Transducer Element Cable Connectors were not included on the CD. Will these documents be made available?
a. Reference 2.9 will be modified VIA ERRATA to call out Rev E. References 2.26 and 2.27 are available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil.
| 59. | In WI 468-90-001, reference 2.23 DDG Mod Critical Path Equipment, Cable System to AIT and Test Requirement Turnover Schedule for DDG-66 was not on the CD provided. Will this reference be made available? | |
| a. The reference is on the CD with the title DDGM BF Critical Path Equipment. | ||
| 60. | In WI 551-80-001, Reference 2.3 is listed as 8100-2400-0062 Rev BC, Pipe Hangers Rigid Type. However, it is Rev “BG” that was furnished on the CD provided to the contractor. Will Rev BC be made available or will the specs be revised to reflect Rev “BG”? Reference 2.4 is listed as 8100-2400-0070 Rev U, Penetration Bhd or Dk Flange Type Hitemp 4500-9500. The actual title on this drawing is Penetration BHD, or Dk, Flange Type High Temp 450° – 950°. Will the specs be changed to read 450° – 950° or is there a different reference that needs to be provided to the contractor? |
a. Both references will be changed via ERRATA to reflect the versions provided to the contractor (Rev BG and High Temp 450° – 950°).
61. In WI 521-80-001 Ref 2.5 is listed as RLAR 75829/DDG60/1131121, Modify Test Note Procedure. The title does not match actual RLAR 75829/DDG60/1131121 recorded on the CD. The actual title on the document furnished is Add DDG 60, 62, 63, 70, 73, 76 & 77 OF RLAR 75829/DDG69/1130130. Was the correct RLAR furnished to the contractor? Ref 2.8 is RLAR 75829/DDG57/1125131, Change Hull Applicability to Remove DDG 57 & 71 from SID & Add DDG 54 to SID. However, this reference was not on the CD provided to the contractor. Will this reference be made available to the contractor? Ref 2.9 is listed as RLAR 75829/DDG74/1141753, Modify ORF Hanger and GA Board Background. However, the file furnished on the CD with this name is not the correct file. When contractor opens it up, the document is RLAR 75829/DDG/1130130 Revise Connector to Gate FM-GA-276 (FMD/GA211). Will the correct reference be provided to the contractor?
a. Reference 2.5 is not applicable and will be deleted via Errata. Reference 2.8 will be deleted via ERRATA. Reference 2.9 is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil
| 62. | In WI 583-11-001 reference 2.6 S9086-TX-STM-020/CH-583, Handling and Stowing Boats and Small Craft, document was not on the CD provided to the contractor, however S9086-TX-STM-010 (Vol 1) was provided. Will Vol 2 be made available to the contractor? | |
| a. Reference 2.6 will be changed on ERRATA 3 to S9086-TX-STM-010 (Vol 1). | ||
| 63. | In WI 593-11-001 reference 2.3 is listed as 593-6218884 Rev J, Vacuum Sewage Sys PP Diag. However 6218884BK Rev J Vacuum Sewage System Engineering Data Booklet was on the CD provided to the contractor. Will the actual drawing be provided to the contractor? | |
| a. The correct reference is 593-6218884 Rev H and will be provided via ERRATA. | ||
| 64. | In WI 612-11-001reference 2.2 is listed as 612-6567058 Rev AC, Lifelines Rails, Stanchions, and Fab Instl of Exterior. However, the drawing provided on the CD to the contractor is Rev ”AD”. Will the specs be revised to reflect this revision or will Rev AD be provided to the contractor? | |
| a. The correct version is Rev AD. The WI will be changed via ERRATA. | ||
| 65. | In WI 634-11-001 reference 2.2 is listed as 600-6219274 Rev AB, DDG-51 Class Hull Outfit Instl, Design Zone 2240, 1ST Platf Fr 174-200. However, the drawing provided to the contractor has a title of DDG-51 CLASS Hull Outfit Instl, Design Zone 2240, 1st PLATF FR 174-220. What is the correct reference? |
a. Reference 2.2 is frame 174 -220 vice frame 174 – 200, which will be modified via ERRATA.
| 66. | WI 644-80-001 reference 2.5 is listed as 512-7634048 Rev E, Habitability Improvement DDG 66 Ventilation CPO & Crew Sanitary Spaces Modifications. However, when the file labeled 7634048_E is opened, it displays drawing 512-8181109 Rev E, Habitability Improvement (DDG 68) Ventilation CPO & Crew Sanitary Spaces Modifications. Will the correct drawing be provided to the contractor? | |
| a. 512-7634048 Rev E shall be used and is available by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil | ||
| 67. | WI 113-11-001 paragraph 3.4 states to accomplish 009-32 Line 21, Column A for surface preparation for each bilge drain well and 25 SF of low point surfaces surrounding each bilge well. There is no allowance following for preservation of these areas. Para 3.8 is only painting those surfaces replaced in 3.5. Please clarify this discrepancy. | |
| a. Paragraph 3.8 was changed via ERRATA to accomplish all drain well surfaces. | ||
| 68. | WIs 472-11-001 & 472-11-002: Drawing 7498087 Rev Q is listed in both the specifications in red. The rev provided on the CD is Rev L. Please confirm the drawing provided is the one to be used by the contractor. |
a. The Rev (L) provided on CD is the drawing to use. This will be modified via ERRATA.
69. Work Item 521-80-001, references 2.3 through 2.13, all refer to drawing 521-8476038, which is a drawing that is ship specific to DDG-51. Reference drawing 2.2 (521-8696656) is a ship specific drawing for DDG-66. There are somewhat significant disparities between the LARs and the primary reference 2.2. Will the LARs specific to DDG-66 and drawing 521-8696656 be provided?
a. Reference 2.2 is correct on the spec. References 2.5 and 2.11 do not apply and will be removed via ERRATA. Ref 2.8 was deleted via Errata 1. Ref 2.9 will be provided by written request to james.hammersley@navy.mil. References 2.3, 2.4, 2.6, 2.7, 2.10, 2.12 and 2.13 are correct on the work spec. The Government recommends saving files directly to ones computer if the file is not loading properly from the CD.
70. Reference 2.6 in WI 432-11-001 is listed as 301-6219139 Rev AJ, Installation of Electrical and Electronic Equipment, Design Zone 2360, 01 Level Frame 276-320. However, the copy of drawing 301-6219139 Rev AJ that was provided to the contractor on the CD is titled Instl Elec & Elex Eqpt Design Zone 4610 01 LVL Fr 276-320. Will the spec be revised to the correct drawing number for Zone 2360 and will this drawing be provided?
a. ERRATA 3 will change Ref 2.6 to Instl Elec & Elex Eqpt Design Zone 4610 01 LVL Fr 276-320.
71. WI 150-11-022, Para 3.2 states to accomplish a visual inspection of bulkhead closure plate support structure and voids for structural integrity, etc. Then para 3.3 states to remove existing and install new in both port and starboard voids all internal structural members. How structural members are to be renewed?
a. Reference dwg 150-6597635 Rev R, Unit Structural Arr Dwg Assy Unit 4410 should show the support members. 10 LF of structural members needs to be replaced.
| 72. | WI 426-80-001, RLAR’s and LAR’s listed in 2.4 – 2.17 were not provided on the CD. Will the Government provide these references? | |
| a. The Government will provide these references. Please send requests to Mike Hammersley at james.hammersley@navy.mil . | ||
| 73. | In WI 633-21-001 the pre-docking testing and inspection required by paragraph 3.2 and post-docking waterborne test and inspection required by paragraph 3.3 are typically accomplished by a technical representative in accordance with NAVSEA standard item 009-90. Will this work item be change to include the technical requirement of 009-90? |
a. Paragraph 4.1 states "This work item interfaces with the following work item(s) throughout the availability". WI 633-21-002, Impressed Current Cathodic Protection (ICCP) Systems; repair is one of the WI listed under para 4.1. WI 633-21-002 has coverage of NSI 009-90 in it and should apply to WI 633-21-001.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .