S-2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USS PAUL HAMILTON (DDG 60) EDSRA
- Solicitation number
- N00024-16-R-4400
About this file
Attachment S-2 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N00024-16-R-4400 USS PAUL HAMILTON (DDG 60) FY16 EDSRA
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions to Offeror
Completed questionnaires shall be forwarded directly to the Naval Sea Systems Command point of contact listed in this letter.
NOTE: ONCE COMPLETED BY THE POC, QUESTIONNAIRES MUST BE DIRECTLY TRANSMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT AS DESCRIBED ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE. COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES RECEIVED FROM OFFERORS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
Instructions to Evaluator
The Naval Sea Systems Command is requesting an evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance for source selection purposes. Accordingly, request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance; please see Section A below for the identity of the Offeror and contract of interest.
Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes Source Selection Sensitive and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials.
Please forward the completed questionnaire no later than XX December 2015 to elyssa.parana@navy.mil and to randolph.cook @navy.mil .
Hand-written evaluations are acceptable. Please answer each question in SECTION B by circling one of the ratings: E V S M U N/A, where:
EExceptional; VVery Good; S-Satisfactory;
MMarginal; UUnsatisfactory; N/ANot Applicable
Exceptional - Contractor performance substantially exceeded expected levels of performance.
Very Good - Contractor performance exceeded expected levels.
Satisfactory – Performance met expected levels.
Marginal - Performance was less than expected.
Unsatisfactory - Performance was significantly less than expected.
In addition, please provide supporting comments for each rating. Please use your supporting comments to highlight the Offeror’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets if required. Your ratings and comments should reflect only “contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.
Please enter the requested information in SECTION C for the person primarily responsible for completing the questionnaire, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the point of contact identified above. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR
SECTION A (To Be Completed by the Offeror)
1. Name of Offeror/Contractor: __________________________________________________
Address of Offeror/Contractor: ________________________________________________
2A. Contract Number (between Prime and Sub):_______________________________________
Task or Order No., where applicable: ___________________________________________
2B. Contract Number (between Government and Prime):________________________________
Task or Order No., where applicable: ___________________________________________
3A. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________
3B. Place of Performance: _______________________________________________________
4. Description of Work/Scope of Effort (max. 50 words): _____________________________
| 5. | POC | Name: |
| Address: | ||
| Tel. No.: | ||
| Voice: | ||
| Facsimile: |
6. Method and Date Questionnaire Sent to POC:
| Date: ____________________ |
| Method: _______________________________ |
SECTION B (To Be Completed by Evaluator)
E Exceptional; V-Very Good; S-Satisfactory;
M Marginal; U Unsatisfactory; N/A Not Applicable
1. Overall Contract Outcome: E V S M U N/A Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to customer requirements, standards of good workmanship and safe practices.
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________
2. Cost Performance: E V S M U N/A Ability to accurately forecast and control costs throughout all phases of the contract.
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________
3. Schedule Performance: E V S M U N/A Ability to develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules, as well as the ability to adapt to changes in requirements and work schedules.
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________
4. Technical Performance (Quality of Product): E V S M U N/A Ability to overcome technical challenges by applying sound engineering principles, complete required engineering analyses and develop adequate technical reports and plans.
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________
4. Subcontracting Plan Adherence and Coordination: E V S M U N/A If a subcontracting plan was required please describe the offerors success in meeting planned goals and/or efforts made to overcome goal deficiencies and challenges as well as the offeror’s ability to successfully manage and integrate subcontractors.
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________
SECTION C (To Be Completed by Evaluator)
1. Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________________________________
2. Position Title: _________________________________________________________
3. Administrating Authority/Agency: _________________________________________________
| 4. Telephone Number: | Voice __________________ | |
| Facsimile _______________ |
5. Signature: ______________________________Date: ____________
Please transmit completed questionnaire to elyssa.parana@navy.mil and to randolph.cook @navy.mil.
Attachment S-2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .