WEXMAC TITUS A0001 SF30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate changes as a result of the Question and Answ ers from the solicitation. Section A, Section C, Section F, Section I, Section L, and Section M have been amended.

No additional questions shall be answ ered from the Government.

The time and date for receipt of the offer is not extended.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 138

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Jul-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N0002325R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-Jul-2025

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Jul-2025

CODE

NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

5450 CARLISLE PIKE

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-2411

N00023 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

22-Jul-2025

N0002325R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENTS

1. Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form amended to:

Paragraph 1 This solicitation represents the Government’s assessment to add a new geographic region and increase the contract maximum for the Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract (WEXMAC). WEXMAC 2.0 incumbents and new contractors are able to submit offerors to response to this solicitation in accordance with N0002324R0001 WEXMAC Section H.1 ROLLING ADMISSIONS

AND REMOVALS:

Paragraph 5 Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Region 27: United States of America and Outlying Territories. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors.

Paragraph 6 This solicitation is only for one (1) region (Region 27: United States of America and Outlying Territories) for Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract (WEXMAC). WEXMAC 2.0.

Small businesses and other than small businesses may submit proposals in response to the solicitation."

2. Section C - Descriptions and Specifications amended to:

N/A Region Table, “Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.pdf”.

Paragraphs 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.1, 1.1, 1.2 “WEXMAC 2.0” to “WEXMAC 2.1”

Paragraph 1.5 (Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.pdf).

Paragraph 5.2.4 - 5.2.6.11 Numbering correction

3. Section F - Deliveries or Performance amended to:

CLIN 0001 POP 15-AUG-2025 TO 31-DEC-2029

4. Section L - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Bidders amended to:

Paragraph L.1.1.8 Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors.

Paragraph L.1.1.10 Mandatory Checklist Requirement: A comprehensive checklist is available at https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/SNFa33FhDq and must be completed by all offerors. This checklist is designed to ensure that offerors have fully addressed all requirements of this solicitation. The completed checklist must be submitted as part of the offeror's proposal via the provided checklist website address. Proposals submitted without a completed checklist may be considered non-responsive and ineligible for award.

Offerors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the checklist.

Paragraph L.3.3 All proposals shall be written using Times New Roman font with no less than 8 point font size including graphics, charts, and other materials (excluding Signed Standard Form 33 “Solicitation, Offer, and Award” Cover Page, Table of Contents, Index, Completed Representations and Certifications (Section K), Attachment 1 – Past Performance Information and Questionnaire(s), Completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports, Other Past Performance Information, Copies of Certificate of Registration/Licenses, Memorandum of Association, Joint Venture Agreements, Copies of Certifications, Quality Procedures, and Financial Statements and/or Information).

Paragraph L.3.4 Line-Item Numbers: Contractors' proposals shall include line-item numbers to facilitate referencing specific information within the proposals for Tab B, Tab C, Tab D, and Tab E.

Paragraph L.4 PROPOSAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

Paragraph L.4.1.2.5 Offerors shall not provide specific Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices and ELIN pricing in response to this solicitation.

Paragraph L.4.1.3.1 Subcontracting Narrative: Offerors shall identify the extent to which subcontracting is needed in order to perform the requirement. In accordance with FAR 9.104-4, proposals that include significant teaming may require additional information demonstrating the responsibility of each subcontractor to fully document the team’s responsibility to perform the requirement.

Paragraph L.4.1.3.2 Small Business Subcontracting Plan Requirement (Region 27): If the offeror is a large business, the proposal must include a comprehensive small business subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR 19.704, addressing all required elements, including realistic goals for subcontracting with small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, HUBZone small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, and women-owned small businesses. Offerors may represent small business goals in percentages. The plan must detail the offeror's strategy for identifying, soliciting, and assisting small businesses throughout the potential scope of the IDIQ, as well as the methods for reporting subcontracting achievements via the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS).

Paragraph L.4.1.5.1.7 Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.pdf. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Paragraph L.4.1.6.1 For each past performance example, the offeror shall fill out Attachment 1 – Past Performance Information and Questionnaire and return it with its proposal. Completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports may be provided in lieu of Attachment 1 – Past Performance Information and Questionnaire(s). Other Past Performance Information may be provided in lieu CPARS reports and Attachment 1 – Past Performance Information and Questionnaire. Offeror shall provide no more than five (5) of Attachment 1 – Past Performance Information and Questionnaire(s). Past performance shall represent performances within the past five years of the issuance of this solicitation. Past Performance Questionnaire may be provided by the contractor within their proposal or offeror’s client may submit the Past Performance Questionnaires to wexmac.titus@us.navy.mil.

Paragraph L.4.1.7.1 The offeror shall provide financial statements for the most recent fiscal year end that comply with the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. At a minimum, the financial statements shall include a balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows or equivalent.

Offerors may also describe available lines of credit or other financial resources available to perform the requirement.

Paragraph L.4.1.8.1 Completed Representations and Certifications (Section K): This shall include any supplemental information required by the representations and certifications in Section K. If the offeror is a joint venture, a Memorandum of Association shall be provided which indicates who has the authority to bind the business entity. SAM.GOV Representations and Certifications (Section K) are acceptable and preferred. If SAM.GOV does not include a Section K (Representations and Certifications), offerors shall complete and submit with Tab H.

5. Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award amended to:

Paragraph M.1.2.2 Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.pdf.

Paragraph M.2.1 A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror(s) within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Paragraph M.2.2 The Contracting Officer may make a responsibility determination with or without requesting any additional information from an offeror to substantiate that it satisfies the general responsibility standards. For example, an offeror that the Contracting Officer is less familiar with may be required to provide information not required from another offeror. The Contracting Officer may consider an offeror’s inability to promptly respond to a request for information as an indication the offeror is not responsible.

Paragraph M.2.3 Nothing in this provision limits the Contracting Officer’s discretion to rely on information available from other sources (e.g., past performance data bases, discussions with other entities familiar with the offeror) or to use any other technique described FAR 9.1 when determining whether the offeror satisfies the FAR 9.104-1 general responsibility standards.

Paragraph M.3.1 The Government intends to evaluate proposals and make awards in the following sequence:

Paragraph M.3.1.1 Current WEXMAC Incumbents: The Government will first evaluate proposals from current WEXMAC incumbent contractors. The Government’s intent is to maintain continuity of services where it represents the best value to the Government.

Paragraph M.3.1.2 Large Businesses: After WEXMAC incumbents are evaluated, then the Government will evaluate proposals from all other Large Business offerors.

Paragraph M.3.1.3 Small Businesses: After other Large Business offerors are evaluated, then the Government will evaluate proposals from Small Business offerors.

Paragraph M.4.1 If, after evaluating proposals in accordance with the sequence outlined in M.1, the Government determines that discussions are necessary or a Certificate of Competency (COC) from the Small Business Administration (SBA) is required for a selected Small Business offeror, the Government will initiate these processes after completing the evaluation of Incumbents, Large Businesses, and Small Businesses as outlined in M.3.

Paragraph M.5.1 The Government reserves the right to issue task order awards concurrently with the evaluation and award of contracts under this solicitation, and prior to the completion of any discussions or COC determinations. This includes issuing task order awards against existing WEXMAC contracts via modification, if deemed advantageous to the Government. The Government may issue task orders under existing contracts or awarded under this solicitation, or a combination thereof, to meet mission requirements.

Additional information available in the SF33 and SF30.

QUESTION AND ANSWERS

Section Question Answer

A

Can the Government confirm that successful offerors will be onboarded to the WEXMAC (N0002324R0001) vehicle in it's entirety or exclusively to WEXMAC 2.1 TITUS? New successful offerors shall receive an IDIQ.

A.1

We are a current awardee under the WEXMAC 2.0 contract and have reviewed Solicitation N0002325R0001 for WEXMAC 2.1 (TITUS). We would like to confirm whether existing WEXMAC 2.0 contractors are required to submit a proposal under WEXMAC 2.1 in order to maintain eligibility for future task orders, or if this solicitation is strictly intended for new vendors seeking to join the WEXMAC pool for region 27?

Section A.1 amended from, "This solicitation represents the Government’s assessment to integrate additional contractors into the Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract (WEXMAC) in accordance with N0002324R0001 WEXMAC Section H.1 ROLLING ADMISSIONS AND REMOVALS," to "This solicitation represents the Government’s assessment to add a new geographic region and increase the contract maximum for the Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract (WEXMAC). WEXMAC

2.0 incumbents and new contractors are able to submit offerors to response to this solicitation in accordance with N0002324R0001 WEXMAC Section H.1 ROLLING ADMISSIONS AND REMOVALS." Incumbents without geographic region 27 are ineligible for task order solicitations under the geographic regions. Ordering offices will determine the geographic region for each task order solicitation.

A.1

If our company is already performing under WEXMAC 2.0, do we still need to compete for WEXMAC 2.1 to be considered for RTOPS under

WEXMAC 2.1?

Section A.1 amended from, "This solicitation represents the Government’s assessment to integrate additional contractors into the Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract (WEXMAC) in accordance with N0002324R0001 WEXMAC Section H.1 ROLLING ADMISSIONS AND REMOVALS," to "This solicitation represents the Government’s assessment to add a new geographic region and increase the contract maximum for the Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract (WEXMAC). WEXMAC

2.0 incumbents and new contractors are able to submit offerors to response to this solicitation in accordance with N0002324R0001 WEXMAC Section H.1 ROLLING ADMISSIONS AND REMOVALS." Incumbents without geographic region 27 are ineligible for task order solicitations under the geographic regions. Ordering offices will determine the geographic region for each task order solicitation.

A.1

RFP Language: N/A Question: Can the Government confirm that awardees on WEXMAC

2.0 and SB 2.0 are not automatically rolled over onto 2.1 TITUS and must submit a proposal for region 27/WEXMAC 2.1?

See Section A.1, "This solicitation represents the Government’s assessment to add a new geographic region and increase the contract maximum for the Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract (WEXMAC). WEXMAC 2.0 incumbents and new contractors are able to submit offerors to response to this solicitation in accordance with N0002324R0001 WEXMAC Section H.1

ROLLING ADMISSIONS AND REMOVALS."

A.4

The solicitation Section H.5 mentions USFK Invited Contractor and Technical Representative Program and SOFA agreements. As this contract is for TITUS, should this section be included in this solicitation?

See Section A.5, "Certain provisions and clauses may only apply to specific regions."

A.4

CENTCOM includes the following countries: Afghanistan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, and Yemen. In Section H.3 of the solicitation, it mentions CENTCOM but this contract is for TITUS. Should this section of the solicitation be present as CENTCOM is not in territorial USA?

See Section A.5, "Certain provisions and clauses may only apply to specific regions."

A.4

AFRICOM includes all of the countries within the African continent except Egypt. In Section H.4 of the solicitation it mentions AFRICOM, but this contract is for TITUS. Should this section of the solicitation be present as AFRICOM is not in the territorial USA?

See Section A.5, "Certain provisions and clauses may only apply to specific regions."

A.4

FAR section 252.225-7980 mentions Contractor Personnel performing in the United States Africa Command of Responsibility. As this contract is for TITUS only, is this FAR clause applicable?

See Section A.5, "Certain provisions and clauses may only apply to specific regions."

A.4

Please confirm if SPOT registration is applicable to this contract performance.

See Section A.5, "Certain provisions and clauses may only apply to specific regions."

A.4

Please confirm that JCCS registration as mentioned in Section H.3.1 is not required under this contract performance as this is TITUS and not an OCONUS contract where JCCS is applicable.

See Section A.5, "Certain provisions and clauses may only apply to specific regions."

A.4

Note: Some clauses in Section I – Contract Clauses and Section K - Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors are for overseas or foreign countries.

Will the Government consider removing those clauses that are not applicable to Region 27?

No. See Section A.4, "Certain provisions and clauses may only apply to specific regions."

A.5 Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors."

A.5 & L.1.1.8

Does the Government intend to allow awards under WEXMAC 2.1 (TITUS) to contractors that are directly or indirectly foreign-owned or controlled, including entities under Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI) as defined by the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)?

No. Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors."

A.5 & L.1.1.8

If foreign-owned or foreign-controlled entities are permitted to receive awards under this solicitation, how does NAVSUP intend to mitigate the supply chain, operational security, and counterintelligence risks associated with such awards, particularly for logistics services supporting U.S.

military operations?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors."

A.5 & L.1.1.8

Why does this solicitation not include any restrictions on foreign ownership, control, or influence, particularly given the nature of the services supporting DoD logistics, installations, and operational readiness?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors."

A.5 & L.1.1.8

Has the Contracting Officer considered imposing a requirement for U.S. ownership and control, or a DCSA-approved FOCI mitigation plan, as a condition of eligibility for award under TITUS?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors."

A.5 & L.1.1.8

& C.PWS &

L.4.1.5.1.7 & M.1.2.2 & I & L & M

Has the Contracting Officer conducted a risk assessment to evaluate whether permitting foreign ownership or insufficiently secured contractors to support U.S. military logistics under TITUS with the United States creates unacceptable vulnerabilities?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors." Section C.PWS added, "Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df". Section L. amended from, “Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP," to, "Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p

df. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Section M.1.2.2 added, "Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df." DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 already incorporated into the solicitation. See Section I, L, and M.

A.5 & L.1.1.8

& C.PWS &

L.4.1.5.1.7 & M.1.2.2 & I & L & M

What measures, if any, has NAVSUP incorporated into the solicitation to protect against espionage, sabotage, or exfiltration of operational data through contractors or subcontractors with foreign ties or weak cybersecurity controls?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors." Section C.PWS added, "Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df". Section L. amended from, “Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP," to, "Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p

df. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Section M.1.2.2 added, "Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df." DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 already incorporated into the solicitation. See Section I, L, and M.

A.5 & L.1.1.8

& C.PWS &

L.4.1.5.1.7 & M.1.2.2 & I & L & M

Given the increasing reliance on supply chain security principles (e.g., NDAA Section 889, DoDI 5000.90), why does TITUS not reflect a stronger posture in favor of U.S.-controlled and cybersecurity-compliant entities?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors." Section C.PWS added, "Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df". Section L. amended from, “Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP," to, "Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p

df. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Section M.1.2.2 added, "Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df." DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 already incorporated into the solicitation. See Section I, L, and M.

A.5 & L.1.1.8

& C.PWS &

L.4.1.5.1.7 & M.1.2.2 & I & L & M

Does the Contracting Officer acknowledge that contractors who have not borne the costs of implementing robust cybersecurity and compliance measures may gain an unfair competitive pricing advantage over compliant firms?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors." Section C.PWS added, "Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204-

7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df". Section L. amended from, “Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP," to, "Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p

df. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Section M.1.2.2 added, "Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df." DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 already incorporated into the solicitation. See Section I, L, and M.

A.5 & L.1.1.8

& C.PWS &

L.4.1.5.1.7 & M.1.2.2 & I & L & M

How does NAVSUP intend to ensure that the award process under TITUS preserves the fairness and integrity mandated by FAR 1.102-2 and 1.602- 2, especially where there are known disparities in cybersecurity compliance among offerors?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors." Section C.PWS added, "Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df". Section L. amended from, “Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP," to, "Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p

df. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Section M.1.2.2 added, "Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df." DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 already incorporated into the solicitation. See Section I, L, and M.

A.5 & L.1.1.8

& C.PWS &

L.4.1.5.1.7 & M.1.2.2 & I & L & M

Why does TITUS not require U.S.-only ownership provisions when prior WEXMAC 2.0 contracts have involved access to military installations, sensitive logistics data, and operational planning information?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors." Section C.PWS added, "Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df". Section L. amended from, “Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP," to, "Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p

df. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Section M.1.2.2 added, "Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df." DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 already incorporated into the solicitation. See Section I, L, and M.

A.5 & L.1.1.8

& C.PWS &

L.4.1.5.1.7 & M.1.2.2 & I & L & M

Is NAVSUP considering updating this solicitation to include limitations on foreign subcontracting or to require that all information technology systems processing CUI be located and operated within the United States?

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors." Section C.PWS added, "Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df". Section L. amended from, “Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP," to, "Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p

df. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Section M.1.2.2 added, "Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df." DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 already incorporated into the solicitation. See Section I, L, and M.

A.5 & L.1.1.8

& C.PWS &

How does NAVSUP intend to enforce Section H provisions related to

Section A.5 added, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the

L.4.1.5.1.7 & M.1.2.2 & I & L & M cybersecurity and supply chain security in light of the lack of specific FOCI or domestic sourcing protections in the current solicitation?

United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. are authorized to perform in Geographic Region 27. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors. “Section L.1.1.8 amended from, "Only U.S.-based companies that are authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offerors," to, "Only U.S.-based companies that are incorporated, directly controlled within the United States, and authorized to work within the U.S. shall submit offers. This requirement applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors." Section C.PWS added, "Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Contractors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df". Section L. amended from, “Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP," to, "Demonstration the offeror has a computer system conforming to the requirements provided under Cyber Security Requirements for outlined within this RFP. Region 27 will include controlled technical information (CTI) and covered defense information (CDI). Offerors shall have a “Basic Assessment” in accordance with DFARS 252.204- 7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p

df. The Government will review SPRS to ensure offerors have completed the "Basic Assessment".

Section M.1.2.2 added, "Offerors shall have completed and met the requirements for “Basic Assessment” in accordance with 252.204-7019 Notice of NISTSP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Additional information available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.p df." DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 already incorporated into the solicitation. See Section I, L, and M.

A.6

It is unclear if TITUS Offerors are also being onboarded for WEXMAC.

The scope is essentially the same, and WEXMAC 2.0 clause H.1 (Rolling Admissions and Removals) was applied to cover issuance of the new TITUS RFP. That said, Section B does not include the funding associated with (new) Region 27, and paragraph L.1.1.6 states that each Offeror may only compete for one Region (only one Region [Region 27] was identified

Only for Region 27. Section A.6 added, "This solicitation is only for one (1) region (Region 27:

United States of America and Outlying Territories) for Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract (WEXMAC). WEXMAC 2.0. Small businesses and other than small businesses may submit proposals in response to the solicitation."

in TITUS).

Can the Government please confirm that Offerors in response to N0002325R0001 are confined to bidding Region 27 only?

B

Will escalation clauses be permitted for fuel, insurance, or high-inflation cost areas? No.

C.1.10

Will travel or conference expenses be reimbursed beyond the $500 minimum for new awardees? No.

C.1.5

Are vendors expected to provide pricing estimates with operational execution plans in the base proposal narrative for evaluative understanding (even if not formally scored)?

No. Follow Section L for requirement for narratives.

C.1.6

Can a small business bid this contract for specific services instead of bidding the entire contract?

Section C.1.6, "The contractor shall provide logistics management and integration services to requiring activities and authorized ordering officers covered by this contract. These services require the contractor to integrate, manage, and perform all services and provide all supplies necessary to fully comply with the terms and conditions described in this performance work statement,"

C.1.6

RFP Language: General Questions: Please confirm that for WEXMAC 2.1 TITUS offerors are to respond only to section 9.3.1 of the

PWS?

Section C.1.6, "The contractor shall provide logistics management and integration services to requiring activities and authorized ordering officers covered by this contract. These services require the contractor to integrate, manage, and perform all services and provide all supplies necessary to fully comply with the terms and conditions described in this performance work statement,"

C.1.6

Will offerors be allowed to submit 'alternate technical approaches' at the RTOP stage that meet or exceed performance outcomes, or will only strict adherence to the ELIN PWS be permitted? Determined at task order level.

C.1.6 & H.1.3

Not all TOPR PWS align with all WEXMAC awardees areas of expertise. Please verify that awardees are not required to submit on TOPRs where their likelihood of winning is low without penalty under CPARS.

Section C.1.6, "The contractor shall provide logistics management and integration services to requiring activities and authorized ordering officers covered by this contract. These services require the contractor to integrate, manage, and perform all services and provide all supplies necessary to fully comply with the terms and conditions described in this performance work statement," and Section H.1.3, "The Government mandates consistent high performance and timely submissions of task order proposals from all MAC contractors. Failure to meet these standards, including but not limited to, repeated poor performance or the neglect to submit proposals for task orders, may result in the contractor's removal from the WEXMAC."

C.1.8.3

Section C.1.8.3 implies a full-day billing even for partial service days.

Will this apply universally to all ELINs, even those where delivery/setup may occur late in the day and usage is minimal?

Determined at task order level and individual ELIN(s).

C.PQS

Are prime contractors awarded a contract under WEXMAC 2.1 allowed to change subcontractors during the period of performance granted they inform the contracting officer of the new subcontractor’s capabilities and SAM registration details? Yes.

C.PWS

WEXMAC 2.1 RFP: There are several references to WEXMAC 2.0 throughout Section C, 0, and 1. Is it the Governments intent to reference the WEXMAC 2.0 program or does the Government intend to update language to WEXMAC 2.1? Please clarify. C.PWS amended appropriately.

C.PWS

Par. 2.1, Event Support Site (ELIN

AA01)

a. What are the minimum acceptable sizes (width x length x height) required for the Open or Closed Tents to cover 300 square meters?

b. Are open tents acceptable if they allow rain, wind or snow inside the tents during inclement weather?

c. Are the lights and outlets in the Open Tents required to be rated for outdoor (wet) usage?

d. What type of flooring (vinyl, wood, hard plastic, etc.) is required in either tent?

e. What type of doors and quantity of doors are required with each Closed Tent?

f. What is the minimum wind load in MPH that the tents are required to withstand?

g. What is the minimum snow load in PSF that the tents are required to withstand?

h. Are test reports required to substantiate that the proposed tents meet the required wind and snow loads?

i. What is the minimum internal temperature required when the tents are deployed Requirements shall be identified at the task order.

in the winter, and what is the maximum low ambient temperature the tents will be deployed in?

j. What is the maximum internal temperature required when the tents are deployed in the summer, and what is the maximum high ambient temperature the tents will be deployed in?

C.PWS

Par. 2.2.3, ELINs AA02 thru AA0B, 20-person to 300-person tents

a. What is the minimum square foot per person required in each Open tent and Closed tent? Requirements shall be identified at the task order.

C.PWS

Par. 2.14, Mist Fans

a. If the Closed tents are deployed to Phoenix in the summertime, or any other hot location in the US, are the mist fans going to provide the required internal temperature when the ambient temperature could be as high as 120ºF? Requirements shall be identified at the task order.

C.PWS

Par. 2.17, Portable Air Conditioner Unit

a. If the AC unit is required to provide cooling for a 200-square-foot-area, what is the height of the area being cooled?

This detail is needed to compute the volume of air that needs to be cooled.

b. How many people will be in the 200-square-foot-area? This information is needed to calculate the latent heat from the people that needs to be cooled.

c. What is the maximum ambient temperature the AC units will be used at? Requirements shall be identified at the task order.

C.PWS

Par. 2.24.2, Shelter and Billeting Services

a. Who is going to be housed in the Billeting Shelters? Requirements shall be identified at the task order.

C.PWS

Par. 6.32, Tent, Closed (ELIN AE0M)

a. Is this tent required to have lights, electrical outlets, doors, windows, or a floor? If so, what are the minimum salient characteristics for these features?

b. Is this tent required to be heated or cooled? If so, what are the minimum Requirements shall be identified at the task order.

salient…