Att_P4_Past Performance Questionnaire 20210827.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) Program Management (PM) Knowledge Based Services (KBS) Contractor Support Services (CSS)
Solicitation number
N0001921R0027
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a solicitation for Program Management knowledge-based services contractor support for the F-35 Joint Program Office. The solicitation requests proposals for services including contract management support, program management support, technical support, analytical support, acquisition support, and operational support. These services are required to successfully field F-35 mission capabilities. The solicitation will result in a single-award indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract with cost plus fixed fee and cost only contract line items for a five year period of performance. The initial task order is for one year beginning in February 2021. The solicitation is set aside for total small business and proposals are due within 10 days of issuance. The Naval Air Systems Command is the contracting agency.

View the file

Other files

Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:Contract No.:Subcontract No. (if applicable):
POC:Title:(Name)(E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past five years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror) A.

CONTRACT

IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:

Program Identification/Title: Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B.

IDENTIFICATION

OF

OFFEROR’S

REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) A.

Compliance of

Services, Documents, and

Related

Deliverables to

Specification

Requirements and

Standards of

Good

Workmanship

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B.

Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

C.

Timeliness of

Performance for

Services and

Product

Deliverables.

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

D.

Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on

Cost Reimbursement

Type

Contracts Only).

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

E.

Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its

Customers’ Interest

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

F.

General

Comments.

Provide any other relevant performance information.

G.

Other

Information

Sources.

Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H.

Respondent

Identification.

Please provide the following information:

Organization: Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature Date

Typed or Printed Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .