MZB VOR SOW - DB Package - 7-28-22.pdf
PDF 215 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-22-Q-00210
About this file
This scope of work document outlines the requirements for a design-build contract to repair the deteriorated seawall located at the Mission Bay (MZB) VOR facility in San Diego, California. The contractor will be responsible for all aspects of design, permitting, construction, and closeout to repair four identified failure areas of the seawall. Key requirements include performing surveys; designing the repair in compliance with environmental and engineering regulations; procuring long-lead materials; mobilizing for construction between October 2022 and March 2023 to avoid nesting seasons; installing geotextile, rock armor, and other materials; conducting inspections and testing; and providing as-built drawings and operation and maintenance documentation upon completion. The Federal Aviation Administration will administer the contract and assist with permitting, and has established schedules for design reviews, progress reporting, and commissioning coordination. Interested contractors must submit questions by August 26, 2022 and proposals by September 2, 2022 for consideration under this firm-fixed-price solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MZB VOR Seawall Repair Rev 0
1. Introduction
2. Project Description
2.1 Design Phase
2.2 Construction Phase
3. Project Budget
4. Project Schedule
5. Project Guides, Requirements and Modifications
5.1 Constraints
6. Scheduling Requirements
6.1 Baseline Schedule Requirements
6.2 Deliverables
7. Meetings and Progress Reporting
7.1 Meetings
7.2 Progress Reporting
8. Permits
8.1 Permits
9. Design Scope
9.1 Technical Requirements and Guides
9.2 Design Elements
9.3 Calculations
9.4 Technical Specifications
9.5 Quality
9.6 Deliverables
10. Environmental Natural and navigable waterway
10.1 Asbestos
11. Construction Quality and Safety
12. Construction
12.1 Construction Staging Plans
12.2 Demolition
12.3 Installation Plan
12.4 Inspection and Testing
13. Cut-Over
13.1 Cut-over Plan
13.2 Meetings
14. Hand-over
14.1 Training
14.2 Handover Information
15. Project Completion
16. Administrative Scope
16.1 Request for Information (RFI)
Attachments:
Attachment 01 – MZB VOR Mission Bay Island Investigation Report
1. Introduction This exhibit sets forth the scope of services to be covered by the subcontract. The purpose of this exhibit is to identify the scope for which the Design-Builder is responsible.
The Design-Builder must design the repair and restoration of the existing deteriorated seawall located at the MZB VOR in San Diego, California, with particular focus on schedule, budget, environmental and quality and coordinate activities with FAA, United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE), site facilities manager, QC/QA manager and authorities having jurisdiction to achieve the required service dates and a successful turnover and outcome.
The Design-Builder must identify and price all elements necessary for the actual repair and restoration work.
2. Project Description
Reference Attachment 01 – MZB VOR Mission Bay Island Investigation Report
The MZB VOR Mission Bay Island has four main shoreline failures, three on the northern side and one on the southern side of the island. The Design-Build contractor will be responsible for all aspects of design and construction, considering all appropriate environmental regulations and procedures, to repair the damaged seawall.
The proposed repair concept for these four failure areas incorporates a geotextile filter fabric underlayer on top of which the underlayer rock and armor rock will be placed. Underlining the proposed repair areas with geotextile filter fabric reduces the possibility of seepage-induced erosion and the potential effects of scour and/or winnowing. Due to the limited wave forces at the site (excluding smaller wind / boat wake waves), it is recommended that two layers of armor stone be placed on a 1V:3H slope with a minimum layer thickness of 2 ft. Additionally, a minimum 0.5 ft layer of stone be placed on the geotextile filter fabric following the alignment of the existing topography as a bedding underlayer, though the underlayer thickness will vary and increase to obtain the required design crest elevation while staying relatively within the existing footprint.
It is also expected that new larger stones be placed at the toe, and that any existing rock that was displaced since the original construction be left in place. The larger rock at the toe will enhance the structural stability and mitigate potential future toe scouring overtime. If additional site-specific analysis are required to ensure proper design solution, the contractor will notify the FAA and include the cost in the bid proposal.
The Least Tern nesting seasons, which restricts the construction season, is of particular importance. The Least Tern nesting season runs from April to September, no construction activity is allowed, therefore it is required that any project physical activities taking place at the site must start and finish within the time frame from October 2022 to March 2023. Other project activities not taking place at the site can be outside of that window. The areas identified on the island as Least Tern nesting locations, are not to be disturbed by construction activities, including personnel access.
The MZB VOR location is an island in the San Diego Mission Bay and surrounded by residential dwellings.
Access to the island is via boat. The contractor will investigate transportation means and method for materials and equipment onto the island. No materials or equipment are allowed to be stored on the island.
The island dry ground will be restored to its original conditions before final acceptance of the project.
The work includes but is not limited to:
2.1 Design Phase:
• The Design-Builder must perform a complete and thorough hydrographic and topographic survey to establish horizontal and vertical control to establish design parameters.
• The Design-Builder must design and install the rock within specified tolerances, as typical for this type of seawall
• New design must repair all failure areas
• The Design-Builder must comply in design with State, federal, FAA, United States
Fisheries and Wildlife (USFW), City of San Diego, USACE Environmental regulations, standards, specifications and requirements.
2.2 Construction Phase
• Provide materials, manpower, management, documentation and special inspections/surveys to furnish and install a complete repair of the seawall
• Close out documentation.
3. Project Budget
TBD
4. Project Schedule The project schedule is as follows:
• Notice of Design-Builder Award
• Notice to proceed for long lead items.
• Notice to proceed for design
• Submittals
• Notice to proceed for construction
• Construction
• In-Service (Final Acceptance)
• Close out Documentation
Final acceptance marks the completion of the Design-Builder’s work and includes completion of all punch list items, closure of all Non-Conformance Reports and resolution of all advisory notices.
5. Project Guides, Requirements and Modifications
The preliminary engineering documents must include a life cycle cost analysis. The result of the document and review by the FAA will include product selection for the precast members, stairs, hand railing, cabling and conduit. The Design- Builder must incorporate the approved selections.
In accordance with California Engineering Statutes, the Design-Builder’s “Designer of Record” is responsible for the final design of the project. All drawings, calculations, specifications, and other engineering documents must be performed under the responsible charge of a California engineer or architect as appropriate.
5.1 Constraints
FAA standard specifications are provided as a guide. The Designer of Record is expected to make appropriate site specific modifications to theses specifications for the construction of this project which must comply with FAA Standards, FAA Orders, and sound engineering judgement.
6. Scheduling Requirements
The Design-Builder must submit a cost and resource loaded baseline schedule, the baseline schedule must be a critical path method schedule and will be used to determine progress and Payments to the Design-Builder. The approved baseline schedule forms the basis for the FAA’s payments to the Design-Builder and its oversight of the project. Scheduling Documents must be provided in both hard copy and in electronic version. Any of the following Formats is acceptable:
1. Microsoft© Project ®
2. Primavera© P6®
3. Microsoft© Excel®
A Twice-Monthly Schedule Status update is required as part of the progress report and progress meetings.
6.1 Baseline Schedule Requirements
6.1.1 FAA Approval of the Schedule
The FAA requires a 15 day review period for the initial submittal of the baseline schedule which commences on the day the schedule is received and terminates upon transmittal of the FAA’s comments to the Design- Builder.
6.1.2 Required Activities
The baseline schedule must include, at a minimum, the activities listed below.
• Contract Award Date
• Notice to Proceed Date
• Design Submittal Dates
• Design Survey Dates
• Design Reviews by the FAA (FAA)
• Long-lead Procurement items
• Construction Mobilization
• Construction Commencement Date
• Removal of any existing materials
• Installation of the geotextile underlayment
• Installation of bedding material underlayer
• Installation of the armor layer
• Hydrographic and topographic surveys
• In-Service date
• Turnover activities
Any additional activities the Design-Builder believes are relevant may be added.
The schedule should be of sufficient detail to be used for a payment schedule.
6.2 Deliverables
6.2.1 Baseline Schedule
The proposed baseline schedule must be submitted within 14 calendar days of receiving notice of award.
The FAA will review and comment on the proposed baseline schedule within 21 days of receiving the submittal.
The FAA and the Design-Builder will meet to review the comments and discuss any concerns regarding the schedule logic and contents. The Design- Builder must incorporate any revisions requested by the FAA and forward the final baseline schedule to the FAA within 14 days of the meeting. Once approved, the baseline schedule forms the basis for the monthly invoice and payment request.
NOTE: Revisions to the Baseline Schedule All revisions to the Baseline Schedule must be handled as a contract change. Baseline schedule revisions require specific written approval of the FAA and a submittal of the proposed revision(s) will be reviewed and comments provided or approval issued within 21 days of receipt of the proposed revision.
6.2.2 B i - Monthly Schedule Status Update
As a part of the progress report, the Design-Builder must submit a bi-monthly (twice monthly) schedule status update that compares actual performance to the baseline schedule and which will justify the progress payment claimed in the invoice.
6.2.3 As-Built Schedule
Provide an as-built schedule documenting the project as part of close out documentation.
7. Meetings and Progress Reporting
The Design-Builder must be required to participate in meetings throughout the life of the project in order to coordinate activities, provide updates on progress, and provide information to the community.
7.1 Meetings
The Design-Builder must meet and coordinate with the FAA and others on site as necessary to facilitate successful completion of the project. Some of the required meetings are:
Project Meetings: Regular meetings will be required, increasing in frequency over time and as construction activities are undertaken;
• Progress Meetings will be held at least monthly during the initial phase of the project and can be held more frequently if requested by the Design-Builder. The monthly meeting will focus on the items required in the progress report.
• Coordination Meetings during design will be held every two weeks
• Coordination Meetings during construction will be held weekly.
7.2 Progress Reporting
As preparation for the monthly progress meeting, the Design-Builder must prepare a draft progress report package and submit it for FAA review by the 5th of each month.
7.2.1 Draft Progress Report Package
The draft progress report package must include all of the following:
• Narrative on progress since the last report
• Identification of any anticipated problems and proposed solutions
• Narrative on schedule deviations
• Narrative on cost deviations
• DMWBE participation report
• A draft payment request for review and discussion prior to submittal of the monthly invoice
• The monthly schedule update.
7.2.2 Progress Meeting
The progress meeting will be held within 7 days of receiving the draft progress report package, the draft report will form the basis of discussion for the progress meeting. The Design-Builder must prepare minutes of the progress meeting and submit them for FAA review and concurrence within 5 days of the meeting.
7.2.3 Final Progress Report Package
The final progress report package must include all the items listed in 7.2.1 and must incorporate any FAA requested changes from the progress meeting. The invoice included in the final progress report package is the one that will be processed for payment.
The final progress report package is due to the FAA within 5 days of the progress meeting.
8. Permits
8.1 Permits
The FAA will assist the Design- Builder in preparing and submitting environmental-work permits to the USACE, USFW and the City of San Diego. The Design-Builder is responsible for researching, preparing, submitting, and obtaining all other required permits for the project.
9. Design Scope
The scope of work includes the development of all engineering drawings, specifications, reports, and calculations for the repair of the MZB VOR seawall. The Design-Builder is required to provide the FAA with a list of anticipated design packages and submittal dates that agrees with the information provided in the baseline schedule and to provide the FAA with a list of scheduled design review dates so that the FAA may monitor the design progress by attending, at its discretion, internal meetings the Design-Builder is holding to review the design.
9.1 Technical Requirements and Guides
The hierarchical order of precedence for the FAA’s design standards, in descending order, is:
FAA Orders FAA Standards Required Specifications FAA Guide Specifications OSHA and other industry standards
Existing drawings are diagrammatic in nature and may not be completely accurate. These drawings are intended as a reference guide only and The Design-Builder must verify all drawings and dimensions prior to the design of the work
9.2 Design Elements
The Design-Builder is responsible for identifying and organizing the design work.
9.3 Calculations
Calculations must be prepared for each design discipline in accordance with the requirements of the State of California Engineering statutes. The calculations must be maintained by the Design-Builder and submitted for FAA review upon each submittal. Calculations must be submitted to the FAA as required under “Deliverables” below.
9.4 Technical Specifications
Technical specifications must be prepared based upon the FAA’s standard specifications. The specifications must be maintained by the Design-Builder and submitted for the FAA’s review at each submittal level. The specifications must be submitted to the FAA as required under “Deliverables” below.
9.5 Design Quality
Drawings must comply with the FAA’s drawing standard FAA-STD-002g and be in AutoCAD® format. A seed border will be provided upon request. FAA or the FAA’s CAD staff will review as-built drawing CAD files for conformance.
9.6 Deliverables
The Design-Builder must prepare all reports necessary to ensure the adequacy and constructability of its design. The FAA has limited the number of required design submittals to allow the Design-Builder maximum flexibility.
The Design-Builder must provide the FAA with one hard copy and one electronic copy of:
• interim and final design documents for review and comment,
• the basis of design report (Design Data Handbook) including calculations and specifications necessary to understand the design
• technical specifications
• technical specifications submittal register (the register will be used to track technical submittals throughout the construction of the project)
• Engineering Reports
Hard copies of drawings should be on half-size sheets; copies of other documents should be on 8.5 by 11” sheets. The submittal register must be submitted in both hard copy and Microsoft® Excel® format.
9.7 Design Data Handbook
The Design-Builder must prepare and submit a report that complements the design and construction documents and provides the FAA with information regarding the assumptions, design philosophy, coordination and integration of design and other information that were used to prepare the design.
• Thirty (30) days prior to submittal of the Interim Design Submittal (identified in
• 9.9 Below) the Design-Builder must submit for the FAA’s review and approval a proposed outline of the basis of design report.
• Once the outline has been approved by the FAA, the Design- Builder must prepare an initial report for submission with the interim design submittal.
• An updated design report must accompany each subsequent submittal. A final design report, based on the approved outline, must be provided to the FAA as part of the contract close-out package.
9.8 Interim Design Submittal (50%)
The required submittal must fix and describe the design intent for the proposed work illustrating the size and scale of elements, materials and systems. The interim design submittal must include, at a minimum, the following:
• Basis of Design Report
• Drawings (in progress)
• Calculations (as appropriate)
• Technical Specifications (in progress)
The Design-Builder must provide half-size drawings as part of the submittal package.
The technical specifications must be provided in red-line/strike out format showing all proposed changes to the guide specifications and a ‘clean’ format showing the proposed completely edited specifications.
The FAA will provide comments on the submittal package within 15 days of its receipt.
9.10 Interim Design Submittal (90%)
The required submittal must continue to expand and define the design intent in further detail and clarity. The interim design submittal must include, at a minimum, the following:
• Basis of Design Report
• Drawings (in progress)
• Calculations (as appropriate)
• Technical Specifications (in progress)
The Design-Builder must provide half-size drawings as part of the submittal package.
The technical specifications must be provided in red-line/strike out format showing all proposed changes to the guide specifications and a ‘clean’ format showing the proposed completely edited specifications.
The FAA will provide comments on the submittal package within 15 days of its receipt.
This stage is a hold point for the Design-Builder. FAA approval of these documents must be obtained by the Design-Builder prior to ordering of long lead items and commencement of any onsite building activities.
9.11 Final Design Submittal (100%)
The final design submittal must be done in two parts first to allow the FAA to review and comment on the package and then to submit the final package with signed and sealed drawings, calculations and specifications. In addition to any requirements listed below, the final design submittal must include an electronic version of the drawings in AutoCAD format and one set of full size drawings signed and sealed and two half size sets of drawings.
9.11.1 Review and Comment Package
The Design-Builder must provide the Authority with half-size drawing sets with this submittal. The submittal at 100% completion must include all of the following items:
• Updated Basis of Design Data Handbook
• Specifications
• Drawings
• Calculations
• Permit Applications or Permits Received
• All Technical Reports
The FAA must complete its review and provide comments to the Design-Builder within 30 calendar days. Consolidated comments will be provided and the FAA will return one half- size set of plans and one set of specifications to the Design- Builder marked “Returned with Comments”.
Within 5 days of receiving the Authority’s comments, the Design- Builder must schedule a meeting with the FAA to disposition the comments. Once the meeting is held, the Design- Builder must incorporate the agreed upon changes into the documents and prepare the final submittal.
9.12 Final Design Submittal Package
The final design submittal package must consist of the design documents including specifications, calculations and reports that demonstrate compliance with the contract requirements, and other information necessary to allow the Design-Builder to coordinate and complete the construction of the project.
The FAA must review the submittal and, within 21 calendar days, notify the Design-Builder of its acceptance or rejection of the package. If the package is accepted, the Design- Builder can proceed to construction.
If the package is rejected, the Design-Builder must make the changes identified by the FAA and resubmit until the package is acceptable to the FAA.
9.13 As-Built Drawings
The Design-Builder must provide the FAA with one electronic copy (in AutoCAD editable format), one set of full sized bond drawings and two half sized copies of the final project record drawings that have incorporated all field changes.
10. Environmental Natural and navigable waterway
Given that the seawall is located in a natural and navigable waterway, it is likely that an approved environmental permit may be needed from the FAA, USACE, WSFW and the City of San Diego. It is unlikely that the project would be prevented as a function of the USACE withholding a permit but there is a possibility that the USACE could require environmental mitigation such as planting sea grasses in the same waterbody at a different location. Implementation of the mitigation effort is to be included in the final design and completed by the Design-Builder. Therefore, the FAA recommends that early coordination with the USACE and the FAA be conducted to determine what considerations are to be implemented in the design. The construction phase must not commence until all permits have been procured and the FAA has made and determination on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation.
10.1 Deliverables
Final drawings depicting environmental concerns and remedies.
11. Construction Quality and Safety
The Design-Builder must implement quality and safety programs that fulfill the requirements set forth in the subcontract, OSHA and AHJ. The Design-Builder must submit to the FAA a copy of their full company safety program during the procurement process for review by the FAA.
The FAA specifically reserves the right to approve all Quality and Safety staff.
All submittals related to quality management and safety must be provided for FAA review and comment or approval.
12. Construction
The Design-Builder must construct the project in accordance with the approved final drawings and the technical specifications. Specific items of significance to the FAA are highlighted below;
this list of items is not all-inclusive and does not relieve the Design-Builder of the obligation to ensure that the project is completed in accordance with all contract requirements.
12.1 Construction Staging Plans
At least 30 days prior to the start of major construction activities, the Design-Builder must prepare and submit for FAA’s review construction staging plans that indicate the area where work will be taking place, the maintenance of traffic plan for the area, any planned coordination with existing FAA operations, equipment that will be utilized, and the anticipated duration of the work in that area.
12.2 Demolition
The Design-Builder must be responsible for any demolition necessary to fulfill its design.
12.3 Installation
The Design-Builder provided schedule must include detailed activities for the installation of all work onsite.
12.4 Inspection and Testing
The Design-Builder is responsible for inspection of all constructed work, verification that manufactured items meet the FAA’s requirements, testing of materials and systems, and maintaining records related to inspection and testing for FAA review and for record.
13. Commissioning
The Design-Builder must participate in meetings and work planning sessions related to the commissioning and must be required to coordinate its work with the FAA in order to minimize negative effects on existing in-service operations.
13.1 Work Plan
The Design-Builder must develop for the FAA’s review and approval, a detailed and comprehensive work plan and must coordinate with the FAA and other contractors or consultants during the development and execution of the work plan
At a minimum, the work plan must address the following:
• Impacts to other facilities, systems, and operations
• Testing and commissioning activities
• Operations and maintenance requirements
Further, the work plan must include of narrative and schedule information including charts that identify, by name, the members of each work crew and the shift starting and ending times. The schedule for the commissioning must be in daily increments and clearly identify all elements of the scope of work.
The plan must identify any Design-Builder required outages and measures for coordinating those requirements with the FAA.
The work plan must be submitted to the FAA a minimum of 60 days prior to the planned work.
13.2 Meetings
The Design-Builder must participate in weekly meetings related to the commissioning beginning 30 days prior to the anticipated commissioning date.
During the commissioning itself, meetings will be held at specified intervals to report on the progress and allow monitoring by the FAA.
14. Hand-over
14.1 Handover Information
The Design-Builder must provide a handover book based to include the following items:
• As-built drawings, calculations, and specifications – 3 sets bond paper bound
• As-built drawings – 3 electronic sets in AutoCad format
• Preventative maintenance schedule, if applicable
15. Project Completion
Final acceptance will be upon completion of all elements of the work including training, handover book, closure of punch-list items, and other items identified in this scope of work and the Subcontract.
16. Administrative Scope
The Design-Builder has some administrative obligations which may not have been addressed elsewhere this section is intended to identify the major administrative scope items.
16.1 Request for Information (RFI)
The Design-Builder is responsible for answering its FAA’s construction questions regarding its design. If the Design-Builder has questions regarding FAA‘s supplied documents or interpretation of FAA provided information, it may submit a written RFI.
If at all possible, the RFI must include the Design-Builder’s suggested resolution. The FAA will respond to requests identified as “RFI” within 10 business days.
End of Scope of Work
| 1. Introduction |
| 2. Project Description |
| 3. Project Budget |
| TBD |
| 4. Project Schedule |
| 5. Project Guides, Requirements and Modifications |
| 5.1 Constraints |
| 6. Scheduling Requirements |
| 6.1 Baseline Schedule Requirements |
| 6.1.2 Required Activities |
| 6.2 Deliverables |
| NOTE: Revisions to the Baseline Schedule |
| 6.2.2 B i - Monthly Schedule Status Update |
| 6.2.3 As-Built Schedule |
| 7. Meetings and Progress Reporting |
| 7.1 Meetings |
| 7.2 Progress Reporting |
| 7.2.1 Draft Progress Report Package |
| 7.2.2 Progress Meeting |
| 7.2.3 Final Progress Report Package |
| 8. Permits |
| 8.1 Permits |
| 9. Design Scope |
| 9.1 Technical Requirements and Guides |
| 9.2 Design Elements |
| 9.3 Calculations |
| 9.4 Technical Specifications |
| 9.5 Design Quality |
| 9.6 Deliverables |
| 9.7 Design Data Handbook |
| 9.8 Interim Design Submittal (50%) |
| 9.10 |
| 9.11 Final Design Submittal (100%) |
| 9.11.1 Review and Comment Package |
| 9.12 Final Design Submittal Package |
| 9.13 As-Built Drawings |
| 10. Environmental Natural and navigable waterway |
| 10.1 Deliverables |
| 11. Construction Quality and Safety |
| 12.1 Construction Staging Plans |
| 12.2 Demolition |
| 12.3 Installation |
| 12.4 Inspection and Testing |
| 13. Commissioning |
| 13.1 Work Plan |
| 13.2 Meetings |
| 14.1 Handover Information |
| 15. Project Completion |
| 16. Administrative Scope |
| 16.1 Request for Information (RFI) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .