MDOC Capacity Realignment_PHASE 200_ 300 SCHEMATIC DESIGN REPORT_4.29.26.pdf

PHASE 200/300 REPORT

Schematic Design

State of Michigan

DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Michigan Department of Corrections

File No: 472/26139.APL Contract No: Y26127

CAPACITY REALIGNMENT

INVESTIGATION

Oaks Correctional Facility St. Louis Correctional Facility

ISID CONTRACT #01079

April 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

MDOC CAPACITY REALIGNMENT INVESTIGATION

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

TABLE OF CONTENTS – FINAL SCHEMATIC REPORT

PART 1 – INTRODUCTION

Background Structural Incompatibility Operational Efficiency and Life-Cycle Costs Impact of the “Safe Prisons Initiative” (2026) Financial Justification MDOC Goals Proposed Project Scope Strategies Trauma-Informed and Staff-Centric Design Structural Hardening and Safety State Primary Contacts

PART 2 – PROGRAM STATEMENT

Purpose of Programs Programming Process Programming Meetings and Activities Definitions Program Summary Detailed Programs Organizational Structure Housing Units Housing Core Services Operational Vision Future Operations Facility Planning Principals Adjacency (Bubble) Diagrams

PART 3 – DIAGRAMS

Cell Layouts SD-1 - Level IV Cell Layouts SD-2 - Level V Cell Layouts

Building Footprints SD-3 - Composite Floor Plan – 1 Floor Option SD-4 - Composite Floor Plan – 1 Floor Option

Facility Placement: Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

SD-5 – Building Placement Options – 1 Floor Plan Facility Placement: Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility

SD-6 – Building Placement Options – 1.5 Floor Plan Facility Placement: Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility

SD-7 – Preferred Building Placement – 1.5 Floor Plan Facility Placement: Level V Housing – St. Louis Correctional Facility

SD-8 – Building Placement Options – 1 Floor Plan Facility Placement: Level V Housing – St. Louis Correctional Facility

SD-9 – Building Placement Options – 1.5 Floor Plan Facility Placement: Level V Housing – St. Louis Correctional Facility

SD-10 – Preferred Building Placement – 1.5 Floor Plan Building Design: Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility SD-11 – Enlarged Floor Plans - Core

SD-12 – Enlarged Floor Plan – 1.5 Floor - Housing Unit – Ground Floor SD-13 - Enlarged Floor Plan – 1.5 Floor - Housing Unit – Mezzanine SD-14 – Exterior Elevations SD-15 – Building Sections SD-16 – 3D Axonometric – Overall SD-17 – 3D Axonometric – Housing Unit SD-18 – 3D View from Direct Supervision Desk

Building Design: Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility SD-19 – Enlarged Floor Plan – 1.5 Floor - Housing Unit – Ground Floor SD-20 – Enlarged Floor Plan – 1.5 Floor - Housing Unit – Mezzanine

PART 4 - TECHNICAL NARRATIVES

Architectural Systems Narrative Structural Engineering Narrative

Mechanical Engineering Narrative Electrical Engineering Narrative

PART 5 - ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS

DTMB Project Data Sheet (Oaks) DTMB Project Data Sheet (St. Louis) Detailed Estimate

Oaks (240 Beds) Detailed Estimate

St Louis (176 Beds) Assumptions

Oaks (240 Beds)

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Assumptions St Louis (176 Beds)

PART 6 – DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

PART 7 – ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET

Cost/SF of Overhead for Existing Facilities Cost of Personnel for New Facilities

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

PART 1 – INTRODUCTION

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

PART 1 - INTRODUCTION

The following report is the program statement, including needs assessment and schematic design document for the Michigan department of Corrections (MDOC) Capacity Realignment Investigation.

The purpose of this report is to document the scope and character of the realignment to security classifications within the MDOC system as applied to two new housing buildings within existing correctional facility campuses: The Oaks Correctional Facility (ECF) in Manistee, MI and The St. Louis Correctional Facility in St. Louis, Michigan (Gratiot County) (SLF).

This document will form the basis for the subsequent development of the design to current best practices as it relates to correctional facility design for the MDOC at these two facility locations.

Background

The MDOC system statewide has an imbalance in the Prisoner classification Levels I, II, IV and V with a surplus of beds for classification levels I-II and a deficit of beds at the higher risk classifications of IV and V.

(Refer to attached Classification Utilization) Justifying expenditures for new Level IV and V facilities over converting lower-level ones relies on three primary pillars: structural integrity for high-risk management, long-term operational efficiency, and staff safety.

While the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) does engage in targeted conversions, such as the recent addition of 190 Level IV beds at Macomb Correctional Facility, full-scale conversion of Level I/II sites is often more expensive and less effective than new builds.

1. Structural Incompatibility

Level I and II facilities are typically designed as open dormitories to facilitate lower-cost housing and more prisoner movement.

• Single-Cell Requirements: Level IV classifications prefer and Level V classifications mandate single-cell housing due to "management needs" or history of violence. Retrofitting open dorms into individual, high-security cells with specialized plumbing and reinforced walls can cost as much as new construction.

• Perimeter and Interior Hardening: High-security facilities require sophisticated electronic detection, double-row fencing with razor wire, and "caged" recreation areas. Integrating these into older, low-security sites often requires a complete overhaul of the existing footprint.

2. Operational Efficiency and Life-Cycle Costs

Building new building allows for modern, "future-proof" designs that can incorporate the best practices for correctional programming and allow sustainability initiatives to be incorporated with those lower long-term costs.

https://www.michigan.gov/corrections/our-operations/cfa https://www.google.com/viewer/place?mid=/g/11bw21lnd7&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAxtWfjfOTAxXalisGHZy_Kt0QqdYPegYIAQgCEAQ

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

• Staffing Ratios: High-security housing requires much higher staff-to-prisoner ratios. New facilities are designed with better sightlines and centralized control rooms that allow fewer officers to monitor more high-risk areas safely compared to retrofitted older buildings.

• Maintenance: Older Level I/II facilities often have significant "deferred maintenance" issues.

Spending funds on new Level IV/V beds avoids sinking "good money after bad" into aging infrastructure that was never intended for high-risk populations.

3. Impact of the "Safe Prisons Initiative" (2026)

The rationale for new high-security investment is heavily tied to the MDOC's Safe Prisons Initiative, which aims to reduce violence.

• Concentrating Resources: By closing underutilized Level II units and investing in purpose-built Level IV/V space, the state can consolidate its workforce and focus on "closer supervision" and "more limited movement" for the highest-risk prisoners.

The cost of incarceration scales significantly with security level. Based on data from the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) and budget briefings, higher security levels (IV and V) incur approximately 40% higher costs annually than Level I facilities.

Daily and Annual Cost Comparison (FY 2024–2026 Estimates)

Security Level Estimated Daily Cost (Per Diem) Estimated Annual Cost

Level I (Minimum) ~$106 – $110 ~$38,851

Level II (Medium) ~$115 – $124 ~$45,026

Level IV (High/Max) ~$150 – $184 ~$54,845

Specialized (Level V/Mental Health) $217 – $390+ $79,000+

Note: Level IV/V costs are often reported as part of "Multi-Level" facility averages ($153–$184 per day) because they are rarely standalone.

Financial Justification

The following drivers justify the high initial expenditure on new Level IV/V facilities:

• Labor as the Primary Cost: Over 78% of the MDOC budget is allocated to operations, primarily driven by staffing. Level IV and V facilities require significantly higher staff-to-prisoner ratios. New, purpose-built designs utilize centralized control and better sightlines, which can reduce the number of high-salaried officers needed to maintain safety compared to a converted inefficient Level II layout.

• Marginal vs. Average Costs: While the average annual cost is ~$48,000, the "marginal cost" of adding high-security beds is higher due to "step-fixed" costs like specialized healthcare and intensive mental health programs, which account for one-fifth of total costs.

https://www.michigan.gov/corrections/press-releases/2026/03/20/release-mdoc-launches-safe-prisons-initiative https://www.michigan.gov/corrections/-/media/Project/Websites/corrections/Files/Legislative-Reports/2026/Prisoner-Costs.pdf https://www.michigan.gov/corrections/-/media/Project/Websites/corrections/Files/Legislative-Reports/2026/Prisoner-Costs.pdf

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

• Avoiding "Sunken Costs": Many Level I/II facilities are aging and have high maintenance needs.

New builds integrate modern technology like the automated count and callout systems, which improve efficiency that old infrastructures cannot support.

• Targeted Bed Management: The MDOC's Safe Prisons Initiative recently converted 190 beds at Macomb, but the department simultaneously closed units at Chippewa to "right-size" the footprint and save on operational overhead that would otherwise be wasted on underutilized low-security beds.

Proposed Project Scope

The scope involves the addition of new housing facilities at two different existing correctional facility campuses with adequate land holdings to support new facilities.

• St. Louis Correctional Facility (SLF) is an existing facility to which is proposed to be added 176-Bed Level V Housing facility comprised of four - 44 bed housing units connected via a core building.

• Oaks Correctional Facility (ECF) is also an existing Correctional Campus with multiple options for locating a new housing building. 240 Level IV beds are contemplated for the Oaks facility.

MDOC Goals

The new facility design would allow the following initiatives:

• Focus on "closer supervision" and "more limited movement" for the highest-risk prisoners.

• Design cells and facilities in a manner that supports the aging prison population by incorporating design features that enhance accessibility.

o In double occupancy spaces eliminate bunk bed arrangements o If possible, provide all cells on one level to increase accessibility and optimize visibility to officer control positions.

o Increase the number of ADA-accessible cells as opposed to providing the minimum number required.

• Future-proofing high-security housing for Level IV and V prisoners by moving away from the

"warehousing" models of the past toward highly adaptable, technology-integrated environments that prioritize safety, specialized management, and operational efficiency. The rationale for building new is that modern security needs—such as AI surveillance and trauma-informed design—cannot be easily or cost-effectively integrated into the rigid, aging structures of existing Level I/II facilities.

Strategies

Advanced Technology Integration - Modern high-security facilities are designed as "smart buildings" where technology acts as a force multiplier for staff.

• AI and Behavior Analytics: New facilities utilize AI-driven video monitoring that can detect aggressive movements or irregular patterns (e.g., potential fights) in real-time to alert staff before violence escalates.

https://www.house.mi.gov/hfa/Archives/PDF/Summaries/25h4706h1_MDOC_Summary_Hse_Passed.pdf https://www.michigan.gov/corrections/press-releases/2026/03/25/mdoc-increases-high-security-beds-and-closes-housing-unit-to-further-safe-prisons-initiative

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

• Biometric and RFID Tracking: Rather than manual counts, staff use biometric access tools and RFID tracking tags to monitor prisoner locations instantly, reducing administrative burdens and preventing unauthorized movement.

• Contraband Detection: Infrastructure built for the MDOC’s Safe Prisons Initiative includes advanced package scanners and secure digital mail systems to prevent drug introduction.

Trauma-Informed and Staff-Centric Design

A major justification for new builds is creating an environment that reduces staff burnout and prisoner volatility.

• Environmental Cues: Incorporating natural light, acoustic treatments to reduce noise stress, and circadian LED lighting has been shown to lower anxiety and violence in high-security settings.

• Special Management Housing: Contemporary designs include dedicated wings for mental health or medical observation (10% of total bed space), preventing the need to "mix" these vulnerable populations with the general high-risk population in makeshift converted areas.

• Staff Wellness Zones: Modern facilities include dedicated relaxation and wellness areas for officers to combat the high turnover and burnout rates common in Level IV/V environments.

Structural Hardening and Safety

• Ligature-Resistant Infrastructure: Modern high-security cells use specialized, wall-mounted, and molded furniture designed to be both "suicide-proof" and "weapon-proof," which is nearly impossible to install comprehensively in older buildings.

• Centralized Control Hubs: Future-proofed layouts use a "telephone-pole" design that places a secure command center at the heart of the facility, ensuring zero blind spots for maximum security personnel efficiency.

https://www.michigan.gov/corrections/press-releases/2026/03/20/release-mdoc-launches-safe-prisons-initiative

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

State of Michigan Primary Contact

Information:

Trever LeBarre - Administrator Physical Plant Division

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Grandview Plaza, 5th Floor 206 E. Michigan Ave.

Lansing, MI. 48909 Mobile: (517)643-6518 lebarret@michigan.gov

Adam Lach, Director Design and Construction Division State Facilities Administration

DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT

& BUDGET

3111 W. St. Joseph Street Lansing, MI. 48917 Phone: (517) 898-2524 Fax: (517) 284-7971 lacha@michigan.gov

ARCHITECT:

PARTNERS in Architecture 65 Market Street Mount Clemens, MI 48043

(586) 469.3600

MEP ENGINEER:

IMEG Corp.

45184 Cass Avenue Utica, MI 48317

COST ESTIMATING CONSULTANT:

Granger Construction

1441 Brooklyn Street, Ste 400 Detroit, MI 48226 mailto:lebarret@michigan.gov mailto:lacha@michigan.gov

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

PART 2 – PROGRAM STATEMENT

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

PART 2 - PROGRAM STATEMENT

Purpose of Programs

Architectural Space Programs

▪ Establish overall building area requirements.

▪ Document program areas required individual operational and functional components.

▪ Document major spatial and operational relationships.

▪ Identify special or unique requirements to communicate to a future design team.

▪ Document site space needs.

▪ Allowing clients and users to validate their needs and concerns have been addressed to proceed to next steps with confidence.

Programming Process

Programming is a highly iterative process involving extensive client and user input combined with analysis of prototypes, prior projects, and precedent study.

The development of the Program of Requirements is the result of interviews with key personnel, participation in project meetings, reports of current operations, review of the design teams prior programs and projects, and the application of planning and programming standards.

Programming Meetings and Activities

▪ Development of programming questionnaire March 5-8, 2026

▪ Pre-Programming review and preparation March 5-8, 2026

▪ Project Kick-off Meeting March 9, 2026

▪ Draft Program Review March 17, 2026

Definitions

Net Square Feet or NSF - the actual working area of a room, or functional area.

Building Gross Square Feet (BGSF) - the accumulated Net Square Feet (NSF) multiplied by a grossing factor to account for circulation space, wall thickness, structure, elevators, vertical circulation, mechanical and equipment rooms, and service spaces.

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Program Summary

Applying the information gathered in the meetings and reviews, an architectural program of requirements was developed for two projects:

1. 240 Bed Housing Building for Level IV occupants.

2. 176 Bed Housing Unit for Level V occupants.

The gross projected space needs for each project are (rounded):

1. Level IV: 240 Bed Building – 63,625 BGSF

(four housing units at 60/beds/unit)

2. Level V: 176 Bed Building – 64,625 BGSF

(four housing units at 44 beds/unit)

(The above program areas are based on a ground level plus mezzanine circulation concept; A single story scheme is larger and exceeds 70,000 BGSF as indicated in later sections.)

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Organizational Structure

Each of the buildings is a complete, stand-alone housing building with components for Housing Units (four per building) and Housing Core Spaces (one per building). The basic components are as follows.

Housing Units (Four per Building)

Each building has four housing units, each housing a quarter of the projected building population. Housing units are the basic element of the housing program. They are the residents’ homes and are where they spend a large part of their non-programmed time. Units contain the cells, showers, dayroom, on-unit dining spaces, on-unit program spaces, staff workspaces, and unit support spaces. Each housing unit has a dedicated, enclosed outdoor recreation deck allowing the residents, with staff supervision, to go outside, for recreation and exercise.

Unit Program Spaces:

- Unit Sallyport: the controlled entry to the unit operated by the Workstation with override by central control.

- Medication Distribution: a room off the sallyport with a roll-up window to the dayroom allowing staff to distribute medications on the unit without having to move residents to a central location and keeps medications in a secure space. It should have a handwashing sink in the room, and a water dispenser on the resident side.

- Cells: the resident’s primary space for sleeping, grooming and study. They may be single or double. A number of accessible (ADA cells) are provided based on the user’s request.

- Showers: individual shower stalls with dressing area for residents. Privacy should be provided to comply with PREA standards.

- Dayrooms: space for out-of-cell, on-unit activity and recreation, and on-unit dining

- Multipurpose Room: a small sub-dayroom for quiet study or on-unit program activities (e.g., AA, NA, study, etc.).

- Interview/Program Rooms: a space on the unit for staff interviews and individual program delivery without having to move the resident off the unit.

- Food and Beverage Station: an open counter in the Dayroom with water, hot water, and a microwave where residents can prepare beverages or food bought from the commissary.

- Multifunction Kiosk: an open station with a digital kiosk for making appointments, filing requests, etc. Residents may also have individual tablets for this.

- Staff Workstation: a station for unit staff with unit door controls, communications, and logs. It should have a view of all cell fronts, dayroom, outdoor deck, and unit program spaces. MDOC prefers the staff workstation be enclosed for staff safety.

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

- Staff Restroom: adjacent to the Workstation allowing staff to use the restroom without leaving the unit. May also be a ‘safe room.’

- Staff supply/charging: a place for staff to store supplies, charge radios, etc. Near the Workstation

- Laundry Cart Staging: a designated open area to stage and store carts

- Food Cart Staging: a designated open area to stage food carts before and after meals

- Washer/Dryer: an enclosed area with unit washer and dryer for resident laundry. Staff will supervise usage and schedule.

- Inmate Storage: a locked room for storage of excess resident property

- Janitor Closet: a locked room for storage of unit cleaning supplies

- Outdoor Recreation Deck: an outdoor area accessible directly from the housing unit, enclosed and dedicated exclusively to the unit. Staff will supervise access and can observe from Workstation.

The space may have exercise equipment, basketball hoops, etc.

Housing Core Services (One per Building)

Each building has a housing core services area that provides services, program space, and support to the four housing units. The program spaces at the core allow for additional programming in the building that may be shared by the units without having to move residents to central programming. The core services area also provides support and managerial support to the professional unit staff.

Housing Core Spaces:

Staff Work Area – provides additional building staff space and support to the housing unit staff. It is a staff-only zone.

- Supervisor’s Office: an enclosed office

- Share Program Staff Office: an office for program staff (may be assigned or shared by multiple staff users)

- Copier Alcove: open area with copier and paper supplies

- Conference Room: an enclosed room for staff meeting

- Staff restroom

Detainee Service Areas:

The Detainee Services Area provides program spaces that can be shared by all four housing units and allows for increased program delivery and reduces movement of residents across the campus.

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

- Officer Workstation: a space for officers to observe the services area with a ledge for logbooks. It should have a view of all detainee areas.

- Staging and waiting adjacent to the officer station for residents waiting to access program spaces.

- Multipurpose/Classroom: an enclosed room for providing educational or group program services.

This increases potential program delivery while reducing escorted movements. Resident will still move to central program areas for program services. The room should be equipped with a computer and video projector for distance learning and conferencing capability. Program examples:

group counseling, anger/personal management groups, special education programs, special activity programs.

- Interview counseling: enclosed room for staff to conduct interviews or deliver individual programs to residents off the unit.

- Library/Media Storage: a room to store library carts from the central library and store media supplies.

- Triage / Exam Room: an enclosed exam room used for sick calls or to triage residents. The room should be outfitted like an exam room with a video conference capability for tele-medicine. Exam rooms in the building reduce the need for escorted movements across the yard to central medical services.

- Medication cart storage: a locked room to store medication carts that are used on the units.

- Haircare Room: an in-building barber shop to reduce escorted movement and missing housing buildings at a central location.

- Storage, trash holding, and janitorial to support the building.

Operational Vision

The goal of the housing buildings is to provide housing and selected programs in a single building. The inclusion of program, support, and medical space in the housing buildings:

- increases the potential for program delivery,

- reduces escorted movements,

- reduces mixing of population during group movements,

- increases the potential for using the building for special populations or needs in the future.

The Housing Units with the Housing Core Services area can function as a ‘mini-facility’ and have a large degree of autonomy. The residents will still participate in central education, industry, and other programs.

Lessons learned in the COVID-era were that the ability to separate populations and deliver some services in-place rather than centrally increased flexibility, reduced operation cost, and reduced security risks

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026 R01

FINAL REPORT #26-109

associated with group movements. This applies also during lock-down periods or during inclement weather restricting movement.

Future Operations

While these buildings are currently programmed as Level IV and Level V units, the inclusion of program support services at the housing units and core areas allows a change in custody level in the future or for creating special housing groupings, or communities (examples: keep separates, therapeutic communities).

Facility Planning Principals

Design includes four housing units (44 beds each, single cell and sixty beds each, double cell) connected to a core building housing administrative services, central inmate services, and central control. Each housing unit is accessed through a sallyport with a view into the sallyport from the housing unit control station.

Housing units are based on a direct supervision model where the control station is usually open to a dayroom/dining room as well as inmate sleeping rooms. In working with different correctional administrations, including State, County, and Federal facilities, the direct supervision model has been regarded as the safest operational model for housing units as the staff have full control of the unit. Since MDOC has decided it wants to operate these units using the officers stations enclosed the design can be indicates glass-enclosed officers’ stations.

The housing unit design is developed so that from the officer’s station, there are open views (no hidden spots) of the day room/dining room and to the door of each individual inmate sleeping room (cells). There is also a complete view into the outdoor recreation space and to the entrance of every program space.

Because of the size (number of beds) in each of the units, the design recommends a two-story scheme (base level + balcony with stairs) that creates efficient square footage rather than a single-story scheme.

Balconies will be appropriately enclosed so not obstruct views to each door of a sleeping room in the unit.

Dayroom and dining can be acoustically controlled by a coffered or sound absorbing ceiling and use of carpeting (carpet squares) in some areas of the dayroom. Dayroom/dining space has been designed with an abundance of daylight strategically located.

Each sleeping room, also referred to as cells, has a window for daylight and a water closet and lav. The design of each of the sleeping rooms isolates the water closet behind a low wall creating a normative privacy area. The water closet and lav in each of the rooms are individual units that are backed up to a utility chase with access to the plumbing. MDOC has decided to use sliding cell doors in lieu of swing doors for the additional functionality and staff safety they afford.

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

Adjacency (Bubble) Diagrams

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

Adjacency (Bubble) Diagrams (Cont.)

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

PART 3 – DIAGRAMS

3' - 4 3/8"

DESK

29" HT

BED

18" HT

DESK

29" HT

BED

18" HT

BED

18" HT

BED

18" HT

CHASE

27 SF

DOUBLE

122 SF

2' - 10"

DESK

29" HT

DESK

29" HT

3 SHELVES

FOOT

LOCKER

17" HT

DOUBLE

122 SF

FOOT

LOCKER

17" HT

9' - 2"

2 BED CELL: 122 SF PLUS 13.5 SF (1/2 CHASE AREA) = 135.5 SF

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Capacity Realignment Investigation MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility

APRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1.5 Floor Option Schematic Design SD-1

1/4" = 1'-0"

2 Double Occupant Cell 1 3D Axonometric - Double Occupant Cell

SINGLE

95 SF

CHASE

15 SF

BED

18" HT

DESK

29" HT

DESK

29" HT

BED

18" HT

3 SHELVES

1 BED CELL: 95 SF PLUS 7.5 SF (1/2 CHASE AREA) = 102.5 SF

FOOT

LOCKER

17" HT

8' - 0"

3' - 9 1/4" 2' - 2"

2'

7"

SINGLE

95 SF

FOOT

LOCKER

17" HT

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Capacity Realignment Investigation MDOC St. Louis Correctional Facility

APRIL 17, 2026

Level V Housing - 1.5 Floor Option Schematic Design SD-2

1/4" = 1'-0"

2 Single Occupant Cell 1 3D Axonometric - Single Occupant Cell

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Building Footprints

Two alternative facility concepts were developed for evaluation of the suitability of each site to support the program. The basic difference being is that there was a desire to develop a single-story solution first; after developing solution that satisfies the program it was found that the footprint became very large and had disadvantages with respect to cost and compactness required for efficient staff movements; the 1 Level Plan.

A second alternative that was developed split the housing units into a ground level and a mezzanine level where half of the beds could be located reducing walk distances and still maintain the level visibility desired by the MDOC. This scheme is referred to as the 1.5 Level Plan.

MAIN

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

GEOTHERMAL

SYSTEM PUMPS

BOILER / PUMP

ROOM

MULTIPURPOSE

ROOM 1

CONFERENCE/

BREAKROOM

SUPERVISOR'S

OFFICE

SHARED PROGRAM

STAFF OFFICE

OFFICER'S

STATION

VESTIBULE

TRIAGE

STAFF

TOILET

SALLY

PORT

HAIR

CARE

TRASH

HOLDING

DETAINEE

RESTROOM

COPIER

MULTIPURPOSE

ROOM 2

INTERVIEW

ROOM

MEDICATION

CART STORAGE

LIBRARY / MEDIA

STORAGE

STAGING / WAITING

AREA

VESTIBULE

DOMESTIC

& FIRE WATER

INTERVIEW

ROOM

INTERVIEW

ROOM

UNIT 1

15,200 SF

UNIT 2

15,200 SF

DINING / DAYROOM

OUTDOOR REC

DIRECT

SUPRV.MULTIPURPOSE

STAFF

SUPPLY

ELECTINTERVIEW

MED

STORAGE

SALLY PORTJC

STAFF

REST

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

60 BEDS TOTAL/UNIT

(54 BEDS IN 27 STANDARD ROOMS

6 ADA ROOMS)

SHOWERS IN ROOMS

DIRECT

SUPRV.

MULTIPURPOSE

STAFF

SUPPLY ELECTINTERVIEW

MED

STORAGE

SALLY PORTJC

STAFF

REST

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

1 STORY SCHEME - LEVEL IV

TOTAL AREA = 73,000 SF

240 BEDS

DINING / DAYROOM

OUTDOOR REC

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

60 BEDS TOTAL/UNIT

(54 BEDS IN 27 STANDARD ROOMS

6 ADA ROOMS)

SHOWERS IN ROOMS

UNIT 3

15,200 SF

UNIT 4

15,200 SF

DINING / DAYROOM

OUTDOOR REC

DIRECT

SUPRV. MULTIPURPOSE

STAFF

SUPPLY

ELECT INTERVIEW

MED

STORAGE

SALLY PORT JC

STAFF

REST

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

60 BEDS TOTAL/UNIT

(54 BEDS IN 27 STANDARD ROOMS

6 ADA ROOMS)

SHOWERS IN ROOMS

DIRECT

SUPRV.

MULTIPURPOSE

STAFF

SUPPLYELECT INTERVIEW

MED

STORAGE

SALLY PORT JC

STAFF

REST

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

DINING / DAYROOM

OUTDOOR REC

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

ADA CELL

60 BEDS TOTAL/UNIT

(54 BEDS IN 27 STANDARD ROOMS

6 ADA ROOMS)

SHOWERS IN ROOMS

CORE BUILDING

1st Flr.: 7,000 SF 2nd Flr.: 2,000 SF Total : 9,000 SF

UNIT 1 - 2nd Floor

800 SF

UNIT 2 - 2nd Floor

800 SF

AHU FOR UNIT 2

AHU FOR UNIT 1

UNIT 3 - 2nd Floor

800 SF

UNIT 4 - 2nd Floor

800 SF

AHU FOR UNIT 4

AHU FOR UNIT 3

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Composite Floor Plan- 1 Floor Option 1/32" = 1'-0"

N

Schematic Design SD-3MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility Capacity Realignment InvestigationAPRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1 Floor Option

UP

UNIT #1UNIT #1

UNIT #2UNIT #2

UNIT #3UNIT #3

UNIT #4UNIT #4

CORE BUILDINGCORE BUILDING

MAIN ENTRYMAIN ENTRY

SD-15

SD-15

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Capacity Realignment Investigation MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility

APRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1.5 Floor Option Schematic Design SD-4

N 1/32" = 1'-0"

1 Composite Floor Plan - 1.5 Floor Option

GROSS AREA: 65,235 SFGROSS AREA: 65,235 SF

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Facility Placement

The following is a summary of Pros and Cons associated with the placement of structures on each of the existing correctional facility campuses to demonstrate the viability of each foot-print at each site alternative.

The final facility layouts for both the Level IV and Level V housing classifications result in very minor differences between either housing classification.

Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility

1 Level Plan

- Building placement ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’

• Pros:

o None

• Cons:

o Footprint exceeds available parcel parameters

A

B

C

A9A,/AB/( 3A5C(/ �A9A,/AB/( 3A5C(/ 2

A35,/ 2�2� � 0A1,67(( 0, �����

�� CDEHUIDH +Z\

3LQH CUHHN 5G

2OVRQ 5G

2O

VR

Q 5G

1L

QH

LOH

B

ULG

JH

RD

G

5HQDLVVDQFH 'U

(DVWODNH 5G

681 678'<

CDEHUIDH +Z\

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Schematic Design SD-5MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility Capacity Realignment InvestigationAPRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1 Floor Option

BXLOGLQJ 3ODFHPHQW 2SWLRQV � � )ORRU 3ODQ

1�7�6�

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Facility Placement

Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility

1.5 Level Plan

- Building placement ‘A’

• Pros:

o Footprint fits within available parcel parameters o Minimal impact to site for geothermal field location

• Cons:

o Need to construct a temporary Secure Perimeter Fence internally for the construction duration o Temporary access will be from a temporary opening in the existing Secure Perimeter

Fence for the construction duration o Reduces the outdoor activity area

- Building placement ‘B’

• Pros:

o Footprint fits within available parcel parameters o Minimal impact to site for geothermal field location

• Cons:

o Need to construct a temporary Secure Perimeter Fence internally for the construction duration o Temporary access will be from a temporary opening in the existing Secure Perimeter

Fence for the construction duration o Reduces the outdoor activity area

- Building placement ‘C’ o None o Footprint exceeds available parcel parameters

AVAILABLE PARCEL 1AVAILABLE PARCEL 2

APRIL 2026 - MANISTEE MI 49660

N

EW

S

55 Caberfae Hwy

Pine Creek Rd

Olson Rd

Ol so n Rd

Ni ne

M ile

B rid ge R oa d

Renaissance Dr

Eastlake Rd

SUN STUDY

Caberfae Hwy

C B

A

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Schematic Design SD-6MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility Capacity Realignment InvestigationAPRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1.5 Floor Option

Building Placement Options - 1.5 Floor Plan N.T.S.

N

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Facility Placement

Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility

Preferred Building Placement

1.5 Level Plan – Building Placement A

BLDG. 200

BLDG. 300

BLDG. 5

BLDG. 6

BLDG. 7

BLDG. 500

BLDG. 100

EXISTING SECURE PERIMETER FENCE

- PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION

ONLY

TEMPORARY SECURE PERIMETER

FENCE INSTALLED FOR DURATION

OF CONSTRUCTION ONLY

NEW FENCE GATE

@ ROAD CROSSING

DEMOLISH WALK

EXISTING WALK

EXISTING

FENCE

EXISTING FENCE

TEMPORARY SECURE PERIMETER

FENCE INSTALLED FOR DURATION

OF CONSTRUCTION ONLY

SITE DEVELOPMENT AREA = 5.5 ACRES

NEW ACCESS

ROAD

PROPOSED

GEOTHERMAL

FIELD

BLDG. 4

CONSTRUCTION SITE

ACCESS OPTION

PROPOSED 1.5 STORY

HOUSING FACILITY

240 BEDS � LEVEL IV

CONSTRUCTION SITE

ACCESS OPTION

Oaks

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Schematic Design SD-7MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility Capacity Realignment InvestigationAPRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1.5 Floor Option

Preferred Building Placement - 1.5 Floor Plan 1" = 150'-0"

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Facility Placement

Level V Housing – St. Louis Correctional Facility

1 Level Plan

- Building placement ‘A’

• Pros:

o Footprint fits within available parcel parameters o Minimal impact to site for geothermal field location o Construction activities will be outside of the Secure Perimeter Fence and perimeter drive areas except for the new access drive to the building.

• Cons:

o The Secure Perimeter Fence and perimeter drive will be re-routed / extended

- Building placement ‘B’

• Pros:

o Footprint fits within available parcel parameters o Minimal impact to site for geothermal field location o Construction activities will be outside of the Secure Perimeter Fence and perimeter drive areas except for the new access drive to the building.

• Cons:

o The Secure Perimeter Fence and perimeter drive will be re-routed / extended o Building, infrastructure, utilities, and drive access is increased o None

• Cons:

o Building is too close to neighboring housing units o Loss of entire running track and athletic field to allow for building and geothermal field o Building 600 and Guard Shelter must be demolished and or relocated

- Building placement ‘D’ o Footprint fits within available parcel parameters o Minimal impact to site for geothermal field location

• Cons:

o Partial loss of running track and athletic field o Weights Building must be demolished and or relocated

AVAILABLE PARCEL

APRIL 2026 - SAINT LOUIS MI 48880

SUN STUDY

E Manroe Rd

E Washington Ave

E Saginaw St

River Ct

N

EW

S

N Croswell Rd

E Prospect St

I&K St

N M ai n

St

Un io n St

St L ou is

N Union Rd

Hu bb ar d

St

Gi dd ing s P l

Gratiot

Se am an S t

N Cl in to n St

N M ai n

Rd

E Tyrell St

S Fr an kl in S t N

Fr an kl in

S t

N Cl in to n St

AB

C

D

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Building Placement Options - 1 Floor Plan N.T.S.

N

Schematic Design SD-8MDOC St. Louis Correctional Facility Capacity Realignment InvestigationAPRIL 17, 2026

Level V Housing - 1 Floor Option

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Facility Placement

Level V Housing – St. Louis Correctional Facility

1.5 Level Plan

- Building placement ‘A’

• Pros:

o Footprint fits within available parcel parameters o Minimal impact to site for geothermal field location o Construction activities will be outside of the Secure Perimeter Fence and perimeter drive areas except for the new access drive to the building.

• Cons:

o The Secure Perimeter Fence and perimeter drive will be re-routed / extended

- Building placement ‘B’

• Pros:

o Footprint fits within available parcel parameters o Minimal impact to site for geothermal field location o Construction activities will be outside of the Secure Perimeter Fence and perimeter drive areas except for the new access drive to the building.

• Cons:

o The Secure Perimeter Fence and perimeter drive will be re-routed / extended o Building, infrastructure, utilities, and drive access is increased o None

• Cons:

o Building is too close to neighboring housing units o Loss of entire running track and athletic field to allow for building and geothermal field o Building 600 and Guard Shelter must be demolished and or relocated

- Building placement ‘D’ o Footprint fits within available parcel parameters o Minimal impact to site for geothermal field location o Partial loss of running track and athletic field

AVAILABLE PARCEL

APRIL 2026 - SAINT LOUIS MI 48880

SUN STUDY

E Manroe Rd

E Washington Ave

E Saginaw St

River Ct

N

EW

S

N Croswell Rd

E Prospect St

I&K St

N M ai n

St

Un io n St

St L ou is

N Union Rd

Hu bb ar d

St

Gi dd ing s P l

Gratiot

Se am an S t

N Cl in to n St

N M ai n

Rd

E Tyrell St

S Fr an kl in S t N

Fr an kl in

S t

N Cl in to n St

AB

C

D

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

Schematic Design SD-9MDOC St. Louis Correctional Facility Capacity Realignment InvestigationAPRIL 17, 2026

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Building Placement Options - 1.5 Floor Plan N.T.S.

Level V Housing - 1.5 Floor Option

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Facility Placement

Level V Housing – St. Louis Correctional Facility

Preferred Building Placement

1.5 Level Plan – Building Placement A

SHOOTING

RANGE STATION

EXISTING

FENCE

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PROPERTY BOUNDARY

EXISTING SECURE PERIMETER FENCE TO

BE RETAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION /

DEMOLISHED UPON COMPLETION

NEW SECURE

PERIMETER FENCE

NEW PERIMETER ROAD

EXISTING ROAD TO BE RETAINED

DURING CONSTRUCTION /

DEMOLISHED UPON COMPLETION

EXISTING FENCE

NEW FENCE NEW ACCESS DRIVE

PROPOSED

GEOTHERMAL

FIELD

SITE DEVELOPMENT AREA = �.5 ACRES

PROPOSED

1.5 STORY HOUSING FACILITY

1�� BEDS / LEVEL V

GUARD TOWER "D"

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Schematic Design SD-10MDOC St. Louis Correctional Facility Capacity Realignment InvestigationAPRIL 17, 2026

Level V Housing - 1.5 Floor Option

Preferred Building Placement - 1.5 Floor Plan 1" = 150'-0"

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY BOUNDARY

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOUSING

AutoCAD SHX Text

UNIT 7

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOUSING

AutoCAD SHX Text

UNIT 4

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOUSING

AutoCAD SHX Text

UNIT 3

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOUSING

AutoCAD SHX Text

UNIT 2

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOUSING

AutoCAD SHX Text

UNIT 1

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG 300

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG 100

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG 200

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG 500

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWER "E"

AutoCAD SHX Text

POLE BLDG

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWER "C"

AutoCAD SHX Text

SANITARY

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG 700

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG 600

AutoCAD SHX Text

WEIGHTS

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLDG 800

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWER "A"

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHELTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHELTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

BACKUP

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROPANE

AutoCAD SHX Text

STATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOUSING

AutoCAD SHX Text

UNIT 6

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHELTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHELTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOUSING

AutoCAD SHX Text

UNIT 5

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUARD

Phase 200/300 Schematic Design Report

ISID CONTRACT #01079

APRIL 17, 2026

FINAL REPORT #26-109

Building Design

Level IV Housing – Oaks Correctional Facility

The following includes Schematic Design Level Architectural documentation for the Oaks facility including floor plans, building sections, exterior elevations, axonometrics and an interior perspective.

SD-16

SD-16

UNIT #1UNIT #1

UNIT #2UNIT #2

UNIT #3UNIT #3

UNIT #4UNIT #4

CORE BUILDINGCORE BUILDING

MAIN ENTRYMAIN ENTRY

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Capacity Realignment Investigation MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility

APRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1.5 Floor Option Schematic Design SD-11

N 1/32" = 1'-0"

GROSS AREA: 65,235 SFGROSS AREA: 65,235 SF

DN

GEOTHERMALGEOTHERMAL

PUMPSPUMPS

VESTVEST

BOILER / PUMPBOILER / PUMP

RMRM MAIN ELECT RMMAIN ELECT RM

DOMESTIC FIREDOMESTIC FIRE

& WATER& WATER

MULTIPURPOSEMULTIPURPOSEMULTIPURPOSEMULTIPURPOSE

LIBRARYLIBRARY

TRASHTRASH

HOLDINGHOLDING

HAIR CUTHAIR CUT

MEDICATIONMEDICATION

CART STORCART STOR

150 SF

STAGING /STAGING /

WAITINGWAITING

INTERVIEWINTERVIEW INTERVIEWINTERVIEW

ELECTELECT CONFERENCECONFERENCE

OFFICERSOFFICERS

SALLY PORTSALLY PORT

INTERVIEWINTERVIEW TRIAGETRIAGE

LOBBYLOBBY

STAFF OFFICESTAFF OFFICE

SUPERVISORSSUPERVISORS

OFFICEOFFICE

DETAINEEDETAINEE

RESTROOMRESTROOM

VESTVEST

STAIRSTAIR

CORRIDORCORRIDOR CORRIDORCORRIDOR

ELECTELECT

STAIRSTAIR

ELECTELECT

ELECTELECTELECTELECT

ELECTELECT

EQUIP RMEQUIP RM

MECHANICALMECHANICAL

ROOMROOM

AHU AHU

FOR FOR

UNIT 1UNIT 1

AHU AHU

FOR FOR

UNIT 3UNIT 3

AHU FOR AHU FOR

UNIT 2UNIT 2

AHU FOR AHU FOR

UNIT 4UNIT 4

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Capacity Realignment Investigation MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility

APRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1.5 Floor Option Schematic Design SD-12

N 1/16" = 1'-0"

1 Enlarged Floor Plan - 1.5 Floor - Core - Ground Floor N

1/16" = 1'-0"

2 Enlarged Floor Plan - 1.5 Floor - Core - Mechanical Level GROUND LEVEL: 7, 923 SFGROUND LEVEL: 7, 923 SF

MECHANICAL LEVEL : 4, 233 SFMECHANICAL LEVEL : 4, 233 SF

TOTAL : 12,156 SFTOTAL : 12,156 SF

80 SF

INMATEINMATE

STORAGESTORAGE

107 SF

INTERVIEWINTERVIEW

303 SF

MULTI-PURPOSEMULTI-PURPOSE

63 SF

STAFF SUPPLYSTAFF SUPPLY

58 SF

STAFFSTAFF

RESTROOMRESTROOM

106 SF

MED STORAGEMED STORAGE

SALLYPORTSALLYPORT

RESTROOMRESTROOM

82 SF

STORAGESTORAGE

30 SF

JCJC

3699 SF

DININGDININGLINE OF

MEZZANINE

ABOVE

SHARED WALL WITH ADJACENT HOUSING

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS

3172 SF

DAY ROOMDAY ROOM

102 SF

LAUNDRY /LAUNDRY /

CART STAGINGCART STAGING

69 SF

STORAGESTORAGE

50 SF

FOOR ANDFOOR AND

BEVERAGEBEVERAGE

STATIONSTATION KIOSKKIOSK

FOOD FOOD

CARTSCARTS

DIRECTDIRECT

SUPERVISIONSUPERVISION

ADA

SINGLE

ADA

SINGLE

ADA

SINGLE

ADA

SINGLE

ADA

SINGLE

ADA

SINGLE

DOUBLEDOUBLEDOUBLEDOUBLE

DOUBLEDOUBLE DOUBLEDOUBLE DOUBLEDOUBLE

DOUBLE

DOUBLE

773 SF

OUTDOOR RECOUTDOOR REC

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Capacity Realignment Investigation MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility

APRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1.5 Floor Option Schematic Design SD-13

N 1/16" = 1'-0"

1 Enlarged Floor Plan - 1.5 Floor - Housing Unit - Ground Floor - 28 Beds

GROUND LEVEL: 9, 692 SFGROUND LEVEL: 9, 692 SF

MEZZANINE : 3,680 SFMEZZANINE : 3,680 SF

TOTAL : 13,372 SFTOTAL : 13,372 SF

OPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOW

DOUBLEDOUBLEDOUBLEDOUBLE

DOUBLEDOUBLE DOUBLEDOUBLE DOUBLEDOUBLE

DOUBLEDOUBLE DOUBLEDOUBLE DOUBLEDOUBLE

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043. This set of drawings, in whole or in part, may not be reproduced without written consent of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC. This information is protected under U.S. Copyright Law, all rights reserved.

Capacity Realignment Investigation MDOC Oaks Correctional Facility

APRIL 17, 2026

Level IV Housing - 1.5 Floor Option Schematic Design SD-14

N 1/16" = 1'-0"

1 Enlarged Floor Plan -1.5 Floor - Housing Unit - Mezzanine - 32 Beds

GROUND LEVEL: 9, 692 SFGROUND LEVEL: 9, 692 SF

MEZZANINE : 3,680 SFMEZZANINE : 3,680 SF

TOTAL : 13,372 SFTOTAL : 13,372 SF

Main Level 100' - 0"

T.O. First Level Ceiling 109' - 0"

T.O. Mezz. Ceiling 117' - 0"

T.O. Core Roof 127' - 0"

1 5 6 3 1

Main Level 100' - 0"

T.O. First Level Ceiling 109' - 0"

T.O. Mezz. Ceiling 117' - 0"

T.O. Core Roof 127' - 0"

43 1 2 3 1 1

6 4 31 2 72 2 2 11 2

PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC

The ideas, concepts, drawings and thoughts conveyed herein are the intellectual property of PARTNERS in Architecture, PLC, 65 Market Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043.