MAY 2025 Extended Install and Turnkey Consolidation - RFO.pdf

PDF 462 KB Posted

Attached to
6525--May 2025 Consolidation - HTME with Extended Installation Services (includes Turnkey Services)
Solicitation number
36A79725Q0008
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Request for Offers (RFO) issued by the VA National Acquisition Center for High-Tech Medical Equipment (HTME) with extended installation and turnkey services. The solicitation (RFO 36A79725Q0008) is open only to current contract holders for medical equipment with the VA National Acquisition Center or Defense Logistics Agency, seeking to acquire medical imaging and radiology systems along with comprehensive installation services.

Key details include a submission deadline of November 19, 2025 at 11:59 PM CST, with a goal to award by April 7, 2026. Vendors must provide detailed pricing, technical specifications, and installation work statements using specific format requirements. The evaluation will focus on equipment features, service availability, and installation capabilities, with non-price factors considered significantly more important than price. Vendors must submit comprehensive documentation through a Box file upload, including equipment brochures, technical specifications, compliance matrices, and installation plans, following strict naming and organizational conventions.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
688B51006 B51007 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
664B54013 B54009 - Additional Drawing.zip ZIP file
581B52063 B52068- Additional drawing.zip ZIP file
580B50021 - 596B50044 Updated TS and CM.zip ZIP file
515B50017 B50018 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
515B50015 B50016 - Additional Drawing.pdf PDF
36A79725Q0008 0001.docx DOCX document
648B53001 B53002 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
596B50043 B50046 - Additional Documents.zip ZIP file
596B50045 - 695B58010 Updated TS and CM.zip ZIP file
691B50050 B50054 - Additional Drawing.zip ZIP file
637B59003 B59004 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
664B54013 B54009 - Additional Drawing.pdf PDF
503B50005 B50009 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
515B50013 B50014 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
556B51011 B51012 - Additional Drawing.pdf PDF
503B50012 B50013 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
596B50045 B50048 - Additional Documents.zip ZIP file
626B54034 B54035 - Additional Documents.zip ZIP file
658B59002 Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
MAY 2025 TKY Schedule of Requirements QA - Updated 10-15-2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
503B50010 B50011 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
596B50044 B50047 - Additional Documents.zip ZIP file
675B57001 B55002 - Aditional Documents.zip ZIP file
614B54002 B54003 - Additional Documents.zip ZIP file
695B58010 B58011 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
Amendment 0001 - Continuation Page.pdf PDF
436B50008 B50009 - Additional Drawings.zip ZIP file
580B50006 - 580B50022.zip ZIP file
503B50010 - 503B50012.zip ZIP file
646B52002 - 667B59027.zip ZIP file
596B50043 -637B59003.zip ZIP file
595B59015.zip ZIP file
503B50005.zip ZIP file
Memorandum for Training.pdf PDF
VA Directive 6550 - New Appendix A - published Jun. 2023.docx DOCX document
Vendor Folders.zip ZIP file
695B58010.zip ZIP file
MAY 2025 TKY Schedule of Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MAY 2025 TKY Consolidation Schedule.pdf PDF
NAC Turnkey Rubric - MAR 2025.pdf PDF
Vendor Workup Spreadsheet - 36A79725Q0008.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
691B50050.zip ZIP file
688B51006.zip ZIP file
675B57001.zip ZIP file
580B50036 - 589B52007.zip ZIP file
580B50024 - 580B50025.zip ZIP file
436B50008.zip ZIP file
36A79725Q0008_1.docx DOCX document
515B50011 - 556B51011.zip ZIP file
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFO 36A79725Q0008

REQUEST FOR OFFERS (RFO) NUMBER: 36A79725Q0008 MAY 2025 CONSOLIDATION

FOR THE ACQUISITION OF HIGH-TECH MEDICAL EQUIPMENT WITH EXTENDED

INSTALLATION SERVICES (INCLUDING TURNKEY SERVICES)

I. By way of this offering, all vendors in the contracting pool are hereby given the opportunity to provide a proposal to supply HTME along with accomplishing the corresponding extended installation (to include turnkey work). Accordingly, vendors must provide a complete proposal, encompassing a price for both the HTME and associated extended installation which will be set forth per each purchase order. In this case, spilt awards will not result. Additionally, under these circumstances, the typical proposal time will not be used; proposal time will incorporate additional time for site visits.

II. Vendor’s proposals will undergo price and technical reviews in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth by this solicitation. A rubric will be utilized to evaluate extended installation services (to include Turnkey work). This tool will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the Vendors Work Statement. An awardable scope must fall within the parameters of Section XIII of the contract, as shown below in pertinent part. Evaluations will be documented in the government’s Technical Evaluation document.

Excerpt from Section XIII of the contract (provided in pertinent part):

(b.) Extended Installation (2.) Extended installation may include: connecting with existing utilities, furnishing, and installing support structures for the equipment, shielding and other minor items as may be required to provide for the routine clinical use of the radiology and imaging system(s).

(c.) Turnkey Installation (3.) General Requirements (i.) Scope. Turnkey installation shall consist of complete support to develop drawings/plans and work statements; site preparation work, non-standard/special rigging, transporting, and installing the radiology and imaging system(s) and documentation to achieve fully operational systems. (Emphasis added, bolded and underlined text)

See Section 2.0 for additional information pertaining to extended installation and turnkey.

III. Awards resulting from this RFO are pursuant to FAR Subpart 16.505 – Ordering.

The Government intends to evaluate offers and award orders without discussions with offerors.

Therefore, the offeror’s initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. If discussions are determined necessary by the CO, the government will hold discussions only with the offerors whose offer conformed with the solicitation’s instructions and was deemed acceptable with regards to all non-price factors (i.e. Availability of Required Features and Availability of Service). The Government reserves the right to seek additional discounts and better terms and conditions from offerors during discussions. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest.

Failure to comply with the following instructions may result in the vendor’s offer being determined unacceptable and may not be considered for award:

0.0 Revisions (N/A)

0.1 6.0 Questions

0.2 6.1

1.0 General Information

1.1 This Request for Offers (RFO) is only open to companies that have a current contract for the equipment types listed herein with the VA National Acquisition Center, High Tech Medical Equipment Branch or with the Defense Logistics Agency, Troop Support (DLA-TS, formerly DSCP) under which the VA National Acquisition Center has been given ordering authority.

1.2 Competition will be limited to current contract holders. In order to have valid submission for this Consolidation, the vendor MUST have a current contract vehicle at the time of offer submission AND at the time of order award. If the vendor’s contract expires after offer submission and no follow-on contract vehicle is issued, the vendor will NOT be awarded any orders.

1.3 Please note that those vendors who are not on contract on the day offers are due will have their responses rejected and returned without consideration per the instructions given.

1.4 Offers containing items that have been proposed as additions to the vendor’s respective contract but have not been implemented by issuance of a contract modification, will be considered ineligible for award and rejected. Therefore, items offered in vendor’s responses to this RFO must currently be awarded on the current HTME Contract at the time of offer submission (Reference Contract Section XIII (b)).

However, items shown as incidentals per Part II of the Contract Scope, are acceptable, this includes accessories (e.g. trailers, repair parts). All items offered as incidentals must comply with the terms and conditions of the contract. The Contracting Officer has wide discretion in accepting or rejecting proposed incidental items and must be able to determine the offered pricing fair and reasonable. “Future Items” (such as hardware or software that is still in development, testing, or prototype) are not acceptable.

1.5 All purchases shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable contract.

1.6 MAY 2025 Consolidation Schedule for HTME with Extended Installation/Turnkey

Services:

1.6.1 09-17-2025 at 11:59 PM CST – Cutoff for Vendor Questions; email questions to Mr. Michael Kuchyak at Michael.Kuchyak@va.gov

1.6.2 11-19-2025 at 11:59 PM CST – Vendor offers due to NAC, HTME Ordering Division

1.6.3 04-07-2026 at 11:59 PM CST – Goal to Award Delivery (90 Days from Assignment) mailto:Michael.Kuchyak@va.gov

2.0 Offers

2.1 HIGH TECH MEDICAL EQUIPMENT (HTME):

2.1.1 A purchase description and corresponding Purchase Order (PO) number is provided for each Requirement.

2.1.2. All resultant delivery orders issued through this RFO are subject to the terms and conditions of the base contract. In the event of conflict between a delivery order and the contract, the base contract shall control.

2.1.3 In consideration of the acquisition strategy utilized for this procurement, wherein a high volume of offers are anticipated for evaluation and award, vendors shall honor their offers (prices) for an acceptance period of no less than 180 days from the closing date of this solicitation.

2.1.4 Vendors shall offer their new equipment that meets or exceeds the technical and functional requirements of the requirements/purchase description. Any offer which fails to meet all technical, functional, and other solicitation requirements may be deemed unacceptable and ineligible for award.

2.1.5 Alternate offers are allowed for each requirement.

2.1.6 Vendors are required to show individual product pricing for each product within an offer. Offers that only reflect a bottom-line price for a system, with no individual product prices, will be considered unacceptable and may be rejected.

2.1.7 If a requirements or purchase description states the item is an “upgrade”, assume that it is a “forklift upgrade”, i.e. the entire system is being replaced. In these instances, the items being replaced are to be used as a trade-in.

2.1.8 The “Information” folder should include the following information (one submission per equipment type is sufficient, see section 7.3.3 for examples on naming the files):

a. Completed pre-procurement assessment form (6550 Appendix A)

b. Product brochures

c. Typical drawings (pdf version of the CAD drawings)

d. Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 140-2 certification

e. Completed Manufacture Disclosure Statement for Medical Device Security

(MDS2) form

f. Operating System (OS) Support Plans for Unsupported Operating Systems

g. In accordance with VA DIRECTIVE 6550 published June 3, 2019, “Procurement of systems with unsupported operating systems is prohibited.

Unsupported operating systems are OSs that are not supported by the manufacturer and have reached the end of the OS lifecycle as published by the OS manufacturer (i.e. no further security patches will be released for the OS by the manufacturer after the OS end-of-life nor will be available by other methods such as extended warranty purchases from the OS manufacturer).”

h. If the proposed medical device or medical system (as defined by 6550) includes an unsupported OS, the vendor shall provide a support plan for the device or system with its response.

i. The OS support plan should include:

j. Purchase of extended warranty from the OS manufacturer

k. Upgrade path to a supported OS

l. Evidence of pending contract modification to add to price list (e.g., e-mail correspondence submitted to cognizant contracting officer)

m. Other relevant evidence furnished by the vendor for consideration

n. Supporting information, to include vendor’s support structure during and after the warranty period

o. Online or telephonic applications support and availability

p. Onsite, in-person support and availability

q. Timeframes for fulfillment of replacement parts/components and repairs not expressly stated in the warranty

r. Technical specification sheets, to include dimensions and weight of the system

s. Technical training - Biomedical: information to include detailed information about the curriculum and length of the biomedical technical training required for each equipment type. Although the NAC will not award this training along with the equipment, it is imperative that the customer is informed that this training is available. Vendors must demonstrate that they can provide any required off-site training, therefore off-site training should be offered as an optional item. Off-site training will be purchased at the time of need via a modification (if the original order remains open) or via a separate order. No travel expenses for any VA employees will be included in any HTME equipment or training order.

The above information should be provided for all equipment types being proposed by a vendor in this Consolidation. One submission per equipment type is sufficient.

2.1.9 All offered products and services must be within scope of the government’s requirements. Items that are outside of scope shall not be proposed in the vendor’s response, to include out of scope items offered at no cost to the government. The contracting officer shall determine if the offered items are within scope. Any item determined to not be within scope of the government’s requirements may be removed from the vendor’s response, or the response may be returned/rejected in its entirety.

2.2 EXTENDED INSTALLATION AND TURNKEY:

2.2.1 Vendors shall provide a Work Statement to perform only the minimum necessary, non-segregable extended installation or turnkey of the High Tech Medical Equipment sought in the Government’s requirement. The proposed installation work shall be incidental to the equipment, and based upon the existing footprint of the room (installation site). As a minimum, the vendor shall include the date it performed the site visit (if applicable); an itemized scope of work statement identifying specific work that is to be accomplished and material to be utilized, a single line room drawing, and an itemized total cost statement for the work and materials. These cost statements shall be presented consistent with the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) 50-division format (MASTERFORMAT) of standardized divisions. Site preparation work necessary to provide for fully functional system, not specifically identified in the Work Statement, but required for operation, is the responsibility of the contractor.

2.2.2 SITE VISIT. Each respective VHA Station will facilitate at least one (1) site visit per requirement, which may be attended by all interested HTME vendors, subcontractors, and affiliates. One-on-one vendor-specific site visits will not be provided. The site visit date, time, and point of contact are shown in the Schedule of Requirements document provided with this RFO. Site visits are not mandatory for vendors to attend; however, they are encouraged. The proposed prices of all extended installation or turnkey work must be realistic and reasonable, and in compliance with the rubric provided with this

RFO.

2.2.3 The Government has provided an “as-built” drawing of the installation site for each requirement sought in this RFO. The Government assumes no liability for the accuracy of the existing drawings. Offerors shall verify all dimensions and other aspects of the existing installation site required for operation and installation of the proposed equipment during the site visit or Q&A phase of the RFO.

3.0 Multi-Unit Discounts

3.1 In addition to individual line item pricing, Vendors will provide a range of multi-unit discounts.

3.2 Multi-unit discounts shall be nationwide and based on the total number of line items purchased from this RFO.

3.3 Multi-unit discounts shall be applied by equipment modality for the entire consolidation.

3.4 Specific line items will not be singled out or specified as a condition of providing multi-unit discounts.

3.5 The vendor must clearly identify the amount of the additional discount and the basis for calculating that discount, such that the VA can independently calculate the final prices of all equipment.

3.6 Discounts may be offered from net line item pricing or from list price; vendor must clearly identify whether the discount is to be applied to list or net prices.

3.7 Vendors shall submit their multi-unit discounts in the following format:

Multi-unit Discount Structure Example

(Based on total number of awards)

Total Number of Awards for

Consolidation

Modalit y

Additiona l

Discount

2 - 10 X-RAY 3%

11 - 25 X-RAY 4%

26 - 40 X-RAY 5%

41 - 70 X-RAY 6%

71 - 100 X-RAY 7%

101 - 125 X-RAY 8%

4.0 Schedule of Requirements

4.1 THE OBLIGATION / PURCHASE ORDER (PO) NUMBERS WILL BE USED AS THE

GOVERNMENT’S REQUIREMENTS NUMBERS

4.1.1 Requirements are shown in the attached spreadsheet entitled “Schedule of Line”. Each requirement is solicited as a standalone opportunity to be awarded as one (1) delivery order.

4.1.2 Offered equipment shall be equivalent in technology/functionality to the requirements or purchase descriptions contained in the applicable attachments.

4.1.3 The attachment number of the requirements will match the corresponding PO number from the “Schedule of Requirements”. Alternate offers must be included on the same requirement number of the “Schedule of Requirements” as the original offer (e.g. labeled as “405B34567 – White River Junction, Model XYZ, Vendor XYZ_1Offer Alt 1”, “405B34567 – White River Junction, Model XYZ, Vendor XYZ_1Offer Alt 2”, etc.) Vendors shall NOT insert (or delete) requirements from the “Schedule of Requirements” spreadsheet.

4.1.4 The net price offered for a line item, if bought as a single system (the “one-each” price), shall not exceed its contract price.

4.1.5 Trade-in values should be included in the vendor and notated on the vendor workup. The trade-in value shall be shown separately from the price of the equipment. The government must determine the trade-in price to be fair and reasonable.

4.2 Vendor Workup Spreadsheets

4.2.1 Vendors will use the attached “Vendor Workup” template to create a “Vendor Workup” spreadsheet for each offer.

4.2.2 Pricing by part number or catalog number for each offer will be shown on a

“Vendor Workup” spreadsheet.

4.2.3 Each “Vendor Workup” spreadsheet will have the same filename as the respective offer but use the .xls or .xlsx filename extension.

4.2.4 Alternative spreadsheets to the “Vendor Workups” will not be considered.

4.2.5 Failure to provide a fully accurate and complete “Vendor Workup” spreadsheet will disqualify your offer from consideration for the requirement.

4.3 Compliance Matrix Spreadsheets

4.3.1 Vendors will use the “Compliance Matrix” templates provided, to create a

“Compliance matrix” spreadsheet for each offer. The compliance matrix should reference specific areas of an offer or other documentation provided (i.e. in the “Information” folder) to show how a vendor meets or exceeds a requirement.

4.3.2 Each “Compliance Matrix” spreadsheet will have the same filename as the respective offer but use the .xls or .xlsx filename extension (see section 7.3.3 for examples on naming the file).

4.3.3 Substitute spreadsheets to the “Compliance Matrix” template will not be considered.

4.3.4 Failure to provide a fully accurate and complete “Compliance Matrix” spreadsheet will disqualify your offer from consideration for the requirement.

5.0 Evaluation and Evaluation Factors – The evaluation process will consist of 4 phases, entailing: 1) Evaluation of HTME offers; 2) Evaluation of the work statement associated with the highest rated HTME offer; 3) Price Analysis; and 4) Best Value Determination.

5.1 Each requirement identified in the Schedule of Requirements will be evaluated independently by the Government’s Technical Evaluation Team.

5.2 The following evaluation factors will be used to rate the proposed equipment:

5.2.1 Availability of Required Features – The vendor will be rated on how well their offered equipment meets the technical and functional requirements outlined in the Equipment Specifications document.

5.2.2 Availability of Service – The vendor will be rated on their availability to provide local technical support (when needed), virtual technical support (telephone assistance, remote diagnostics, etc.), repair parts availability, technical documentation, etc. Specific experience within the VISN regarding overall vendor responsiveness to service and clinical application requests and reliability of service will be considered.

5.3 Evaluation Factor Ratings Definitions for the HTME:

“Availability of Required Features” and “Availability of Service” will be rated as follows:

Outstanding: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal contains multiple strengths and no deficiencies.

Good: Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains at least one strength and no deficiencies.

Acceptable: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal has no strengths that exceed specified performance or capability requirements and has no significant deficiencies.

Marginal: Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is not awardable.

Adjectival Description Definitions:

Considerable Strength: An aspect of an offer that has significant merit or exceeds specifications or capability requirements in a way that will be substantially advantageous to the Government.

Strength: An aspect of an offer that has merit or exceeds specifications or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government.

Weakness: A flaw in the offer that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance under the delivery order.

Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful performance under the delivery order.

Deficiency: A material failure of an offer to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in an offer that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

Risk: The potential for unsuccessful performance under the delivery order. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical requirements may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful performance of the system.

5.4 The following evaluation factors will be used to rate the EXTENDED INSTALLATION/

TURNKEY SERVICES:

5.4.1 The Vendor’s Work Statement will be evaluated utilizing the enclosed rubric.

To be determined acceptable, the Vendor’s proposal must include work that is non-segregable and doesn’t involve substantial construction work that is physically or functionally capable of being performed on a segregated basis.

Work elements must fall within the parameters of the contract, comprising of the following.…… (see full RFO, which is attached hereunder)

5.4.2 Extended Installation

(1.) The Vendor shall furnish a statement of work, room drawings, and price breakdown for the extended installation work to be performed.

(2) The Vendor’s Extended Installation Work Statement, shall include, as a minimum, the date a site survey was performed, a scope of work statement identifying work that is to be accomplished and material to be utilized, a single line room drawing, and total cost statement for the work and materials. These cost statements shall be presented consistent with the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) 50-division format (MASTERFORMAT) of standardized divisions. Site preparation work necessary to provide for fully functional system, not specifically identified in the Work Statement, but required for operation, is the responsibility of the contractor. The extended installation effort shall incorporate nationally recognized trade organization codes and reflect the minimum requirements to provide a safe and functional radiology and imaging system(s).

5.4.3 Turnkey Installation

(1.) The Government will provide all available architectural and engineering drawings of the installation site locations to the Vendor. The Government assumes no liability for the accuracy of the existing drawings. Offerors shall verify all dimensions and other aspects of the existing installation site required for operation and installation of the proposed equipment.

(2.) General Requirements

(i.) Scope. Turnkey installation shall consist of complete support to develop drawings/plans and work statements; site preparation work, non-standard/special rigging, transporting, and installing the radiology and imaging system(s) and documentation to achieve fully operational systems.

(ii.) Turnkey Installation shall minimize, to the extent possible, the interference with the operation of the working radiology department or imaging clinic.

(iii.) All material, unless specified otherwise, resulting from any demolition and renovation, shall become property of the Contractor and be removed from Government property daily. Any existing work that is damaged by the Contractor shall be restored at no additional cost to the Government.

(iv.) Materials. Unless otherwise specified, all materials used in the turnkey installation effort shall be new and of first rate quality.

(v.) Utilities

(A) Existing utilities. Contractor shall check the location of existing utilities required to be utilized to meet the requirements of this contract. Contractor shall protect, maintain, remove and/or cap utilities as necessary in accordance with local codes and regulations.

(B) Utility connections. Contractor shall connect to utilities, as necessary, in a manner conforming to the nationally recognized code covering the specific utility and at a time satisfactory to preclude disruption to existing functions or clinical services in the hospital. Contractor shall provide at least seven (7) days’ notice to the appropriate persons at the medical facility prior to making any such tie-ins.

(vi.) Power Conditioning. Contractors shall visit the installation site and survey its electrical power to determine its adequacy for operation of the proposed radiology and imaging system(s), and that the system will not be damaged due to electrical power problems, including brown outs, total power interruptions, electrical surges, sags, electrical storms, etc. Image quality (where applicable) and system performance must not be degraded due to electrical power problems. An Uninterrupted Power Source (UPS) is not specified unless required due to site specific characteristics. Vendor shall recommend (or not recommend) inclusion of an UPS depending on the results of their electrical power survey.

(vii.) Turnkey Installation Price Breakdown. Contractor shall provide a description with price breakdown of the turnkey installation effort(s) in the CSI 50-division format (MASTERFORMAT) of standardized divisions. The site preparation work necessary to provide for fully functional system, not specifically identified in the Work Statement, but required for operation, is the responsibility of the contractor.

(viii.) Work Statement(s). The work statement(s) shall include the descriptions, instructions, standards, specification, rules, quality, qualifications, limitations, schedules, and requirements for the turnkey installation work to be done. The work statement(s) shall be prepared using the CSI 50-division format (MASTERFORMAT) of standardized divisions.

5.5 Evaluation Factor Ratings Definitions for the EXTENDED INSTALLATION/TURNKEY

SERVICES:

Acceptable: Vendor’s Work Statement doesn’t include segregable work and complies with the contract requirements set forth at the above paragraphs 5.4, to include the corresponding subparagraphs.

Unacceptable: Vendor’s Work Statement includes other than non-segregable work and substantial construction work that is physically or functionally capable of being performed on a segregated basis and doesn’t comply with the contract requirements set forth at the above paragraphs 5.4, to include the corresponding subparagraphs.

5.6 Price Analysis: Price proposals for HTME and extended installations/turnkey work will be evaluated for price reasonableness.

5.7 Award will be made to the offeror that represents the best value to the

Government, price and other factors considered. All non-price factors are equal and when combined and are significantly more important than price.

6.0 Questions

6.1 VENDOR QUESTIONS, PLEASE UTILIZE THE SECOND TAB OF THE SCHEDULE

OF LINE ITEMS LABELED QA. IT LAYS OUT THE FORMAT. PLEASE KEEP EACH

QUESTION TO ONE ROW PER PO. DO NOT MERGE ANY CELLS TOGETHER.

EVERYTHING SHOULD BE ABLE TO BE EASILY COPIED FROM ONE

SPREADSHEET TO THE MASTER SPREADSHEET. IF YOU HAVE MULTIPLE

QUESTIONS FOR A PO, USE ANOTHER ROW. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ON

SPECS, PUT THEM ALL IN ONE CELL FOR THAT PO. THERE ARE SEPARATE

COLUMNS FOR EQUIPMENT QUESTIONS AND TURNKEY QUESTIONS, AS WELL

AS SEPARATE COLUMNS FOR THE ANSWEARS. PLEASE PUT YOU QUESTION

IN THE CORRECT CELL.

7.0 Download Instructions

7.1 Documents identified as zip files need to be saved to your local computers prior to opening the file.

7.2 Follow these download instructions:

7.2.1 Click on the document name.

7.2.2 When prompted to open or save, select save.

7.2.3 Browse to the location on your local computer where you wish to save the file.

7.2.4 Change the extension of the file to zip (do this by changing the .doc to a .zip in the filename. You may not need to do this.)

7.2.5 Click “Save”.

7.2.6 Open the zip file on your local computer.

8.0 Response Format

8.1 For each line item on which the vendor chooses to make an offer, the following information shall be provided:

8.1.1 Individual configuration offer by line item.

8.1.2 Offers shall include part numbers, expanded descriptions, net pricing for each part number, the total contract list price, and the total net price for each offer.

8.1.3 Vendors must submit the proposed extended installation / turnkey work using the SOW CSI format template provided with this RFO.

8.1.3.1 Only a brief description of the proposed work to be performed shall be entered into SOW CSI format template. Do not propose additional commercial terms and conditions.

8.1.3.2 All costs associated with the proposed extended installation / turnkey work must be disclosed using the SOW CSI format template. Costs are not required to be certified.

8.1.4 Pricing at the line item level is the price the VA will pay if that line item is the only one awarded to the vendor from this RFO.

8.1.5 If the multi-unit discounts are calculated from the contract list price, then the list price of each component must also be shown on the configuration offer.

8.2 For line items that include a trade-in:

8.2.1 Trade-in values must be included in the vendor offer and notated on the vendor workup. The trade-in value shall be shown as discount price, separately from the price of the equipment. The government must determine the proposed trade-in value fair and reasonable.

8.3 Responses shall be provided in the following format (FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

THIS FORMAT MAY RESULT IN OFFERS BEING REMOVED FROM EVALUATION

AND NOT BEING CONSIDERED FOR AWARD):

8.3.1 The completed Schedule, the description of the multi-unit discount structure, all equipment offers, all vendor workups, and all information requested in 2.8 shall be uploaded to Box.

8.3.2 The Vendor Response shall use the folder structure provided via attachment

VENDOR FOLDERS. Vendors can download the attachment ZIP file provided and include their offers in the appropriate folders. More detail on this structure is provided below.

Figure 1 outlines an abbreviated version of the folder hierarch. The full folder hierarchy would include a complete modality and VISN listing. Please do not use any symbols or special characters (i.e. #,$,% etc.) in any folder or file names. The only symbols allowed are the “-“ for use in equipment type folders and “_” for use at the end of the file name – see examples below.

Figure 1: Folder Hierarchy only showing VISN 1

8.3.3 There are two (2) main folders: Information and Offers-Workups-Matrix.

Please do not add, edit, or delete any folder or subfolder or change their names. See figure 2 below.

Figure 2: Main Folders

Information folder: Contains subfolders for each equipment type. The equipment type must match the “Schedule of Requirements” spreadsheet on SAM. This includes multi-unit discounts, amendment letter and any other information the vendor determines is necessary for the decision making process. See sections 2.8 for additional required documentation in the “Information” folder.

The name of each document must follow the convention below:

a. 6550 - Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of

Vendor Example: 6550 – XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

b. BROCHURE- Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor

Example: BROCHURE– XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

c. DRAWINGS - Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor Example: DRAWINGS– XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

d. FIPS140 - Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor

Example: FIPS140– XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

e. MDS2- Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of

Vendor Example: MDS2 – XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

f. OS_SUPPORTPLAN - Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor

Example: OR_SUPPORTPLAN– XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

g. SUPPORT - Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor Example: SUPPORT– XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

h. TECHSPECS- Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor

Example: TECHSPECS– XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

i. TECHTRAINING - Equipment Type, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor Example: TECHTRAINING– XR-US, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ

Figure 3: Information folder divided by Equipment Type

Figure 4: Equipment Type folder divided by Model

Figure 5: Naming convention inside information folder

Offers-Workups–Matrix folder: Contains subfolders for each VISN and then a subfolder for each equipment type.

1. Offers - Shall only be provided in a PDF document. The name of each offer must follow the convention below:

Obligation Number – Location of the Medical Center, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor Offer

Current Folder

Examples:

(1) 650B20008 – Providence, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ_1Offer

(2) 650B20008 – Providence, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ_1Offer Alt 1

2. Workups - Shall only be provided in an Excel document. The name of each workup must follow the convention below: Obligation Number – Location of the medical center, Equipment Model Name, Name of Vendor Workup

Examples:

(1) 650B20008 – Providence, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ_2Workup

(2) 650B20008 – Providence, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ_2Workup Alt 1

3. Compliance Matrix* - Shall only be provided in Excel document. The name of each compliance matrix must follow the convention below: Obligation Number – Location of the medical center, Equipment Model Name, Name of Compliance Matrix Examples:

(1) 650B20008 – Providence, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ_3Matrix

(2) 650B20008 – Providence, Model ABC, Vendor XYZ_3Matrix Alt 1

*Compliance Matrix is required for all requirements

If a vendor wishes to provide alternate offerings, the naming schema for these offers, workups and compliance matrix(s) will be as described above with “Alt 1” added to the end of the document name (e.g. labeled as “405B34567 – White River Junction, Model XYZ, Vendor XYZ_1Offer Alt 1”, “405B34567 – White River Junction, Model XYZ, Vendor XYZ_1Offer Alt 2”, etc.)

Figure 6: Offers/Workup/Matrix folder divided by VISN

Figure 7: VISN 1 subfolder inside the larger Offers folder

Figure 8: Obligation number and naming convention inside equipment type folder

9.0 Response Submission Requirements

RESPONSES SUBMITTED BY CD-ROM, E-MAIL, PAPER, OR FAX WILL NOT BE

ACCEPTED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN

YOUR RESPONSE NOT BEING ACCEPTED OR CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

9.1 Responses shall be submitted as follows:

9.1.1 Vendor Response documents must be uploaded to Box here.

9.1.1.1 Instructions on how to complete the file upload.

9.1.1.1.1 Open link, select the select Files button, choose the

Vendor Folder file and select open, and finally hit Submit.

9.1.1.1.2 A confirmation should show that it was successful.

https://veteransaffairs.ent.box.com/f/d68c34080a014fb38011fbb8db0b599b

9.1.2 Vendors shall use the “Vendor Folders” attachment provided and zip the folder to upload it to Box as the firm’s response. Do not upload various file attachments into Box directly. The vendor response shall be uploaded into Box as one ZIP file unless the file size is greater than 2 GB.

9.1.2.1 If your vendor response is greater than 2 GB, you must break out and upload multiple ZIP files to stay within the size limitation.

Complete as few file uploads as possible to provide a fully complete vendor response. Multiple file uploads should be done in a logical manner, with the “Information” and “Offer-Workup-Matrix” folders being provided as separate ZIP file uploads whenever possible.

9.1.2.2 All documents within the ZIP file shall be UNLOCKED, UNPROTECTED and SEARCHABLE for editing to facilitate preparation of orders for award. Acceptable file formats are Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel and Adobe PDF.

9.1.2.3 The name of the ZIP file shall be identical to the awarded contractor name, (e.g., “Company ABC, Inc” not, “ABC Offer”).

9.1.3 An email stating that the submission was made to Box (Can also provide a copy of the successful confirmation notice in the email) must be e-mailed to the NAC Consolidation Contracting Officers at, Michael.Kuchyak@va.gov.

9.1.3.1 This e-mail will serve as your firm’s formal response to the solicitation. The e-mail must be timestamped no later than the closing date/time of solicitation to be accepted (refer to Section 8.2.1).

9.1.3.2 The vendor response e-mail must be titled as follows:

“Box Vendor Response: MMM YYYY Consolidation/ Contractor Name”

9.1.3.3 Do not delete or modify any files uploaded to Box after submitting your vendor response e-mail. THIS WILL RESULT

IN YOUR RESPONSE NOT BEING ACCEPTED OR

CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

9.1.3.4 Do not upload any new files to Box after submitting your vendor response e-mail. THIS WILL RESULT IN YOUR

RESPONSE NOT BEING ACCEPTED OR CONSIDERED FOR

AWARD.

9.2 Closing Date and Responses

9.2.1 Responses are due to the NAC, HTME Ordering Division no later than:

11:59 PM CST on November 19, 2025.

9.2.2 Responses not received by the closing date and time will be determined late and will not be considered for award.

9.2.3 Responses shall not be submitted prior to five days from the closing date of the solicitation. Responses delivered before will be rejected.

NOTE: RESPONSES SUBMITTED BY CD-ROM, E-MAIL, PAPER, OR FAX

WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

9.3 Inquiries may be sent to:

Mr. Michael Kuchyak, Contracting Officer, Michael.Kuchyak@va.gov

10.0 ENCLOSURES:

10.1 MAY 2025 TKY Consolidation Schedule

10.2 MAY 2025 TKY Schedule of Requirements

10.3 Specifications/Purchase Descriptions

10.4 Vendor Folders.zip

10.5 Vendor Workup Spreadsheet – 36A79725Q0008

10.6 VA Directive 6550 – New Appendix A – published Jun. 2023

10.7 NAC Turnkey Rubric - MAR 2025

10.8 Memorandum for Training

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .