Attachment 5_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Marine Corps Tactical Systems Support Activity (MCTSSA) Networks, Engineering, Test and Cybersecurity (NETC) Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M68909-20-R-7600
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a federal contract opportunity with the Marine Corps Tactical Systems Support Activity. The contract is for Network, Engineering, Test and Cybersecurity Services located at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California. The period of performance is expected to begin on August 10, 2020. The anticipated procurement will be a firm fixed price multiple award task order contract issued as a 100% 8(a) set-aside. Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management database to conduct business with the Department of Defense. The solicitation is scheduled to be released on or around May 1, 2020 via beta.SAM and no hard copies will be available. Offerors are responsible for checking for any updates to the pre-solicitation notice. The past performance questionnaire template includes instructions for contractors to provide to assessors to evaluate and submit their past performance directly to the contracting office.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M68909-20-R-7600 NETC RFP_Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| M68909-20-R-7600 NETC RFP_Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 DD254 June 3 2020.pdf | ||
| M68909-20-R-7600 NETC RFP_QA - FINAL_0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5_Past Performance Questionnaire v2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 6_Notional Travel.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 PWS_Amend 0002.pdf | ||
| M68909-20-R-7600 NETC RFP_Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 DD254.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 PWS_FINAL.pdf | ||
| M68909-20-R-7600 NETC RFP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 Past Performance Worksheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 CDRL_FINAL.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 5: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE TEMPLATE
Instructions:
· Sections I through II are to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (customer point of contact with experience on the effort). The assessor, in turn, is to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit it directly to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the solicitation) copies of the Past Performance Questionnaires with Sections I though III completed, as submitted to customers.
· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
· Sections III through VII are to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: katrina.wimmer@usmc.mil
I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
| Solicitation Number |
| M68909-20-R-7600 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Networks, Engineering, Test and Cybersecurity Services |
| Customer/Agency |
| Marine Corps Tactical Systems Support Activity (MCTSSA) |
| Project/Requirement Description |
| Contractor shall provide support in the conduct of developmental testing, integration, and sustainment support of Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) Programs of Record (PoRs) |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The information listed below is |_| Correct |_| Incorrect.
CONTRACTOR
NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract Number
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Performance Period Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Other (Specify)
IV. Evaluation Definitions
Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
V. Performance Evaluation
1. Quality of Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Performance
Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating, especially if it is Exceptional, Marginal or Unsatisfactory.
2. Schedule Performance (Timeliness)
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Schedule Performance
Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating, especially if it is Exceptional, Marginal or Unsatisfactory .
3. Management Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Management Performance
Please provide rationale for assigned rating, especially if it is Exceptional, Marginal or Unsatisfactory.
4. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs, if costs control was pertinent to your contract?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost Control
Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating, especially if it is Exceptional, Marginal or Unsatisfactory.
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
VII. Would you recommend this offeror or use them for future work?
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .